Can the rhythm of any music with a consistent pulse be represented through a time signature?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I tried this with a lot of world music (I myself am an Indian) and majority of it, that followed a consistent pulse or a well timed rhythm, could be expressed neatly using time signatures.



Can this be applied to all music? If yes, does it mean that any systematic rhythm does follow an underlining pulse?










share|improve this question





















  • You say 'the majority'. Did you find an example with a consistent pulse that couldn't? Please show it to us.
    – Laurence Payne
    3 hours ago










  • Majority of it that did follow a consistent pulse*
    – Aman Trivedi
    1 hour ago














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I tried this with a lot of world music (I myself am an Indian) and majority of it, that followed a consistent pulse or a well timed rhythm, could be expressed neatly using time signatures.



Can this be applied to all music? If yes, does it mean that any systematic rhythm does follow an underlining pulse?










share|improve this question





















  • You say 'the majority'. Did you find an example with a consistent pulse that couldn't? Please show it to us.
    – Laurence Payne
    3 hours ago










  • Majority of it that did follow a consistent pulse*
    – Aman Trivedi
    1 hour ago












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I tried this with a lot of world music (I myself am an Indian) and majority of it, that followed a consistent pulse or a well timed rhythm, could be expressed neatly using time signatures.



Can this be applied to all music? If yes, does it mean that any systematic rhythm does follow an underlining pulse?










share|improve this question













I tried this with a lot of world music (I myself am an Indian) and majority of it, that followed a consistent pulse or a well timed rhythm, could be expressed neatly using time signatures.



Can this be applied to all music? If yes, does it mean that any systematic rhythm does follow an underlining pulse?







theory rhythm time-signatures world-music






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









Aman Trivedi

333




333











  • You say 'the majority'. Did you find an example with a consistent pulse that couldn't? Please show it to us.
    – Laurence Payne
    3 hours ago










  • Majority of it that did follow a consistent pulse*
    – Aman Trivedi
    1 hour ago
















  • You say 'the majority'. Did you find an example with a consistent pulse that couldn't? Please show it to us.
    – Laurence Payne
    3 hours ago










  • Majority of it that did follow a consistent pulse*
    – Aman Trivedi
    1 hour ago















You say 'the majority'. Did you find an example with a consistent pulse that couldn't? Please show it to us.
– Laurence Payne
3 hours ago




You say 'the majority'. Did you find an example with a consistent pulse that couldn't? Please show it to us.
– Laurence Payne
3 hours ago












Majority of it that did follow a consistent pulse*
– Aman Trivedi
1 hour ago




Majority of it that did follow a consistent pulse*
– Aman Trivedi
1 hour ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Yes, as long as the music's pulse is consistent, it can be expressed with a time signature. Given polymeter music, you might need a separate time signature for each instrument/part, but you can still go for one time signature per instrument!



The time signature can look vaguely ridiculous such as 13/8 or 22/16, but hey, it's only one time signature!



(You'd be surprised how common music with an inconsistent pulse is, though!)






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Merely having consistent time intervals establishes a pulse, but not a meter. You can very well have an irregular succession of groupings of events that defies any single time signature.



    Imagine a work song that accompanies rhythmic chopping of something (perhaps logs swimming by, or stones to hew...). The items of work might require one, two, three, etc. chops depending on how big each one happens to be, but the worker would still try to space the chops (and the notes) regularly. This would represent a consistent pulse with an irregular meter that can be described only through changing the time signature for every bar, which becomes pointless.






    share|improve this answer




















    • Indeed. Consider Danse de la fureur, Messiaen's Quartet for the End of Time's 6th movement. There is no conductor, and the four players play the same rhythm as each other throughout, so, to keep in step, they must imagine a regular pulse which determines when to play each note. But there is no regular metre. Messiaen writes no time sigs. If you wanted to use time sigs, you'd have to either change at (almost) every bar line or have bar-lines which fail to represent the music's stresses.
      – Rosie F
      4 hours ago

















    up vote
    1
    down vote













    I think it depends what you mean by 'consistent pulse' and 'represented'!



    A single time signature by itself tells you that there are a certain number of a particular note value per bar. The rhythm of the music is then notated with notes and rests within each bar that add up to the length of the bar. Note and rest values in standard notation are fractional, such that any mathematically rational note length can be represented. However, if you had a repeating (and perfectly systematic) rhythm of notes of relative length 1:√2:1:√2:1:√2... , that isn't possible to represent using standard note values within the context of a single time signature. (Of course you could still use some other notational device to represent this).



    A time signature also often implies something about the relative strengths of each beat - the meter of the music. The first beat of the bar is usually inferred to be strong; the beats within the bar are then also assumed to follow a certain pattern - for example 6/8 is something like strong-weak-weak-medium-weak-weak. However, it is possible to think of a regular stress pattern that doesn't have a time signature commonly understood to imply it. In these cases, it might be useful to consider the music as a number of different time signatures alternating in a pattern, forming a mixed meter that is still regular. This is still expressing the meter through could be expressed time signatures, but not a single time signature.






    share|improve this answer




















      Your Answer







      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "240"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f75055%2fcan-the-rhythm-of-any-music-with-a-consistent-pulse-be-represented-through-a-tim%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      Yes, as long as the music's pulse is consistent, it can be expressed with a time signature. Given polymeter music, you might need a separate time signature for each instrument/part, but you can still go for one time signature per instrument!



      The time signature can look vaguely ridiculous such as 13/8 or 22/16, but hey, it's only one time signature!



      (You'd be surprised how common music with an inconsistent pulse is, though!)






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted










        Yes, as long as the music's pulse is consistent, it can be expressed with a time signature. Given polymeter music, you might need a separate time signature for each instrument/part, but you can still go for one time signature per instrument!



        The time signature can look vaguely ridiculous such as 13/8 or 22/16, but hey, it's only one time signature!



        (You'd be surprised how common music with an inconsistent pulse is, though!)






        share|improve this answer






















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          Yes, as long as the music's pulse is consistent, it can be expressed with a time signature. Given polymeter music, you might need a separate time signature for each instrument/part, but you can still go for one time signature per instrument!



          The time signature can look vaguely ridiculous such as 13/8 or 22/16, but hey, it's only one time signature!



          (You'd be surprised how common music with an inconsistent pulse is, though!)






          share|improve this answer












          Yes, as long as the music's pulse is consistent, it can be expressed with a time signature. Given polymeter music, you might need a separate time signature for each instrument/part, but you can still go for one time signature per instrument!



          The time signature can look vaguely ridiculous such as 13/8 or 22/16, but hey, it's only one time signature!



          (You'd be surprised how common music with an inconsistent pulse is, though!)







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 6 hours ago









          Dekkadeci

          3,1932916




          3,1932916




















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Merely having consistent time intervals establishes a pulse, but not a meter. You can very well have an irregular succession of groupings of events that defies any single time signature.



              Imagine a work song that accompanies rhythmic chopping of something (perhaps logs swimming by, or stones to hew...). The items of work might require one, two, three, etc. chops depending on how big each one happens to be, but the worker would still try to space the chops (and the notes) regularly. This would represent a consistent pulse with an irregular meter that can be described only through changing the time signature for every bar, which becomes pointless.






              share|improve this answer




















              • Indeed. Consider Danse de la fureur, Messiaen's Quartet for the End of Time's 6th movement. There is no conductor, and the four players play the same rhythm as each other throughout, so, to keep in step, they must imagine a regular pulse which determines when to play each note. But there is no regular metre. Messiaen writes no time sigs. If you wanted to use time sigs, you'd have to either change at (almost) every bar line or have bar-lines which fail to represent the music's stresses.
                – Rosie F
                4 hours ago














              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Merely having consistent time intervals establishes a pulse, but not a meter. You can very well have an irregular succession of groupings of events that defies any single time signature.



              Imagine a work song that accompanies rhythmic chopping of something (perhaps logs swimming by, or stones to hew...). The items of work might require one, two, three, etc. chops depending on how big each one happens to be, but the worker would still try to space the chops (and the notes) regularly. This would represent a consistent pulse with an irregular meter that can be described only through changing the time signature for every bar, which becomes pointless.






              share|improve this answer




















              • Indeed. Consider Danse de la fureur, Messiaen's Quartet for the End of Time's 6th movement. There is no conductor, and the four players play the same rhythm as each other throughout, so, to keep in step, they must imagine a regular pulse which determines when to play each note. But there is no regular metre. Messiaen writes no time sigs. If you wanted to use time sigs, you'd have to either change at (almost) every bar line or have bar-lines which fail to represent the music's stresses.
                – Rosie F
                4 hours ago












              up vote
              1
              down vote










              up vote
              1
              down vote









              Merely having consistent time intervals establishes a pulse, but not a meter. You can very well have an irregular succession of groupings of events that defies any single time signature.



              Imagine a work song that accompanies rhythmic chopping of something (perhaps logs swimming by, or stones to hew...). The items of work might require one, two, three, etc. chops depending on how big each one happens to be, but the worker would still try to space the chops (and the notes) regularly. This would represent a consistent pulse with an irregular meter that can be described only through changing the time signature for every bar, which becomes pointless.






              share|improve this answer












              Merely having consistent time intervals establishes a pulse, but not a meter. You can very well have an irregular succession of groupings of events that defies any single time signature.



              Imagine a work song that accompanies rhythmic chopping of something (perhaps logs swimming by, or stones to hew...). The items of work might require one, two, three, etc. chops depending on how big each one happens to be, but the worker would still try to space the chops (and the notes) regularly. This would represent a consistent pulse with an irregular meter that can be described only through changing the time signature for every bar, which becomes pointless.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 4 hours ago









              Kilian Foth

              3,065913




              3,065913











              • Indeed. Consider Danse de la fureur, Messiaen's Quartet for the End of Time's 6th movement. There is no conductor, and the four players play the same rhythm as each other throughout, so, to keep in step, they must imagine a regular pulse which determines when to play each note. But there is no regular metre. Messiaen writes no time sigs. If you wanted to use time sigs, you'd have to either change at (almost) every bar line or have bar-lines which fail to represent the music's stresses.
                – Rosie F
                4 hours ago
















              • Indeed. Consider Danse de la fureur, Messiaen's Quartet for the End of Time's 6th movement. There is no conductor, and the four players play the same rhythm as each other throughout, so, to keep in step, they must imagine a regular pulse which determines when to play each note. But there is no regular metre. Messiaen writes no time sigs. If you wanted to use time sigs, you'd have to either change at (almost) every bar line or have bar-lines which fail to represent the music's stresses.
                – Rosie F
                4 hours ago















              Indeed. Consider Danse de la fureur, Messiaen's Quartet for the End of Time's 6th movement. There is no conductor, and the four players play the same rhythm as each other throughout, so, to keep in step, they must imagine a regular pulse which determines when to play each note. But there is no regular metre. Messiaen writes no time sigs. If you wanted to use time sigs, you'd have to either change at (almost) every bar line or have bar-lines which fail to represent the music's stresses.
              – Rosie F
              4 hours ago




              Indeed. Consider Danse de la fureur, Messiaen's Quartet for the End of Time's 6th movement. There is no conductor, and the four players play the same rhythm as each other throughout, so, to keep in step, they must imagine a regular pulse which determines when to play each note. But there is no regular metre. Messiaen writes no time sigs. If you wanted to use time sigs, you'd have to either change at (almost) every bar line or have bar-lines which fail to represent the music's stresses.
              – Rosie F
              4 hours ago










              up vote
              1
              down vote













              I think it depends what you mean by 'consistent pulse' and 'represented'!



              A single time signature by itself tells you that there are a certain number of a particular note value per bar. The rhythm of the music is then notated with notes and rests within each bar that add up to the length of the bar. Note and rest values in standard notation are fractional, such that any mathematically rational note length can be represented. However, if you had a repeating (and perfectly systematic) rhythm of notes of relative length 1:√2:1:√2:1:√2... , that isn't possible to represent using standard note values within the context of a single time signature. (Of course you could still use some other notational device to represent this).



              A time signature also often implies something about the relative strengths of each beat - the meter of the music. The first beat of the bar is usually inferred to be strong; the beats within the bar are then also assumed to follow a certain pattern - for example 6/8 is something like strong-weak-weak-medium-weak-weak. However, it is possible to think of a regular stress pattern that doesn't have a time signature commonly understood to imply it. In these cases, it might be useful to consider the music as a number of different time signatures alternating in a pattern, forming a mixed meter that is still regular. This is still expressing the meter through could be expressed time signatures, but not a single time signature.






              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                I think it depends what you mean by 'consistent pulse' and 'represented'!



                A single time signature by itself tells you that there are a certain number of a particular note value per bar. The rhythm of the music is then notated with notes and rests within each bar that add up to the length of the bar. Note and rest values in standard notation are fractional, such that any mathematically rational note length can be represented. However, if you had a repeating (and perfectly systematic) rhythm of notes of relative length 1:√2:1:√2:1:√2... , that isn't possible to represent using standard note values within the context of a single time signature. (Of course you could still use some other notational device to represent this).



                A time signature also often implies something about the relative strengths of each beat - the meter of the music. The first beat of the bar is usually inferred to be strong; the beats within the bar are then also assumed to follow a certain pattern - for example 6/8 is something like strong-weak-weak-medium-weak-weak. However, it is possible to think of a regular stress pattern that doesn't have a time signature commonly understood to imply it. In these cases, it might be useful to consider the music as a number of different time signatures alternating in a pattern, forming a mixed meter that is still regular. This is still expressing the meter through could be expressed time signatures, but not a single time signature.






                share|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  I think it depends what you mean by 'consistent pulse' and 'represented'!



                  A single time signature by itself tells you that there are a certain number of a particular note value per bar. The rhythm of the music is then notated with notes and rests within each bar that add up to the length of the bar. Note and rest values in standard notation are fractional, such that any mathematically rational note length can be represented. However, if you had a repeating (and perfectly systematic) rhythm of notes of relative length 1:√2:1:√2:1:√2... , that isn't possible to represent using standard note values within the context of a single time signature. (Of course you could still use some other notational device to represent this).



                  A time signature also often implies something about the relative strengths of each beat - the meter of the music. The first beat of the bar is usually inferred to be strong; the beats within the bar are then also assumed to follow a certain pattern - for example 6/8 is something like strong-weak-weak-medium-weak-weak. However, it is possible to think of a regular stress pattern that doesn't have a time signature commonly understood to imply it. In these cases, it might be useful to consider the music as a number of different time signatures alternating in a pattern, forming a mixed meter that is still regular. This is still expressing the meter through could be expressed time signatures, but not a single time signature.






                  share|improve this answer












                  I think it depends what you mean by 'consistent pulse' and 'represented'!



                  A single time signature by itself tells you that there are a certain number of a particular note value per bar. The rhythm of the music is then notated with notes and rests within each bar that add up to the length of the bar. Note and rest values in standard notation are fractional, such that any mathematically rational note length can be represented. However, if you had a repeating (and perfectly systematic) rhythm of notes of relative length 1:√2:1:√2:1:√2... , that isn't possible to represent using standard note values within the context of a single time signature. (Of course you could still use some other notational device to represent this).



                  A time signature also often implies something about the relative strengths of each beat - the meter of the music. The first beat of the bar is usually inferred to be strong; the beats within the bar are then also assumed to follow a certain pattern - for example 6/8 is something like strong-weak-weak-medium-weak-weak. However, it is possible to think of a regular stress pattern that doesn't have a time signature commonly understood to imply it. In these cases, it might be useful to consider the music as a number of different time signatures alternating in a pattern, forming a mixed meter that is still regular. This is still expressing the meter through could be expressed time signatures, but not a single time signature.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 4 hours ago









                  topo morto

                  20.9k23691




                  20.9k23691



























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f75055%2fcan-the-rhythm-of-any-music-with-a-consistent-pulse-be-represented-through-a-tim%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Comments

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What does second last employer means? [closed]

                      List of Gilmore Girls characters

                      One-line joke