Why does the game stop after the kicking team catches a punt?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I am a occasional football watcher from Europe, so please excuse my stupid question.



My question is the following: The standard outcome of a punt is a catch by the defending team and some running before he goes down or out of bounds. Sometimes, however, a member of the punting team happens to catch the punt, in which case the defending team gets possession where the catch happened. I don't really understand why the play does not continue in this case. What does such a catch distinguish to a 'normal catch'? I have the following thoughts:



  • Kicking forward is generally allowed and could theoretically be done in 'normal play'. [EDIT: This assumption turned out to be wrong.]

  • Sometimes, kick-offs are done in a manner to maintain possession (I guess this is called on-side kick?). If it's allowed in this case to catch the ball, why not after a punt?

  • Kicking the ball wide forward (and usually giving up possession) is often seen in Rugby as a means to open up the game. If a member of the kicking team gains possession, the game just goes on.

Based on my understanding, I'd hence assume the kicking team would at least be granted a new first down. I don't see a reason why the possession would change in this case.










share|improve this question









New contributor




E. Sommer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    I am a occasional football watcher from Europe, so please excuse my stupid question.



    My question is the following: The standard outcome of a punt is a catch by the defending team and some running before he goes down or out of bounds. Sometimes, however, a member of the punting team happens to catch the punt, in which case the defending team gets possession where the catch happened. I don't really understand why the play does not continue in this case. What does such a catch distinguish to a 'normal catch'? I have the following thoughts:



    • Kicking forward is generally allowed and could theoretically be done in 'normal play'. [EDIT: This assumption turned out to be wrong.]

    • Sometimes, kick-offs are done in a manner to maintain possession (I guess this is called on-side kick?). If it's allowed in this case to catch the ball, why not after a punt?

    • Kicking the ball wide forward (and usually giving up possession) is often seen in Rugby as a means to open up the game. If a member of the kicking team gains possession, the game just goes on.

    Based on my understanding, I'd hence assume the kicking team would at least be granted a new first down. I don't see a reason why the possession would change in this case.










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    E. Sommer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      I am a occasional football watcher from Europe, so please excuse my stupid question.



      My question is the following: The standard outcome of a punt is a catch by the defending team and some running before he goes down or out of bounds. Sometimes, however, a member of the punting team happens to catch the punt, in which case the defending team gets possession where the catch happened. I don't really understand why the play does not continue in this case. What does such a catch distinguish to a 'normal catch'? I have the following thoughts:



      • Kicking forward is generally allowed and could theoretically be done in 'normal play'. [EDIT: This assumption turned out to be wrong.]

      • Sometimes, kick-offs are done in a manner to maintain possession (I guess this is called on-side kick?). If it's allowed in this case to catch the ball, why not after a punt?

      • Kicking the ball wide forward (and usually giving up possession) is often seen in Rugby as a means to open up the game. If a member of the kicking team gains possession, the game just goes on.

      Based on my understanding, I'd hence assume the kicking team would at least be granted a new first down. I don't see a reason why the possession would change in this case.










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      E. Sommer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      I am a occasional football watcher from Europe, so please excuse my stupid question.



      My question is the following: The standard outcome of a punt is a catch by the defending team and some running before he goes down or out of bounds. Sometimes, however, a member of the punting team happens to catch the punt, in which case the defending team gets possession where the catch happened. I don't really understand why the play does not continue in this case. What does such a catch distinguish to a 'normal catch'? I have the following thoughts:



      • Kicking forward is generally allowed and could theoretically be done in 'normal play'. [EDIT: This assumption turned out to be wrong.]

      • Sometimes, kick-offs are done in a manner to maintain possession (I guess this is called on-side kick?). If it's allowed in this case to catch the ball, why not after a punt?

      • Kicking the ball wide forward (and usually giving up possession) is often seen in Rugby as a means to open up the game. If a member of the kicking team gains possession, the game just goes on.

      Based on my understanding, I'd hence assume the kicking team would at least be granted a new first down. I don't see a reason why the possession would change in this case.







      rules american-football






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      E. Sommer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      E. Sommer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 13 mins ago





















      New contributor




      E. Sommer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 hours ago









      E. Sommer

      134




      134




      New contributor




      E. Sommer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      E. Sommer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      E. Sommer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          This is covered in Rule 9, Section 3, Article 2, Item 2 of the NFL Rules.




          Illegal Catch or Recovery. If the kickers catch or recover a kick beyond the line that has not been touched beyond the line by the receiving team, the ball is dead, and it is first-and-10 for the receivers at the spot of catch or recovery.




          In your scenario, the ball is dead because the punting team recovered a kick beyond the line of scrimmage without the receiving team touching the ball. Note that this is different from a kick-off, which can be recovered by the kicking team after the ball has travelled 10 yards.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          just curious is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.
























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            If I understand your question correctly, you're asking why play stops if the punting team touches the ball. This is because it is technically a penalty for illegal touching for the punting team to touch the ball on a punt first.



            Now, because it is a penalty, the receiving team is in fact allowed to advance the ball if it merely touched and not "downed", and anything bad that happens is null (similar to interceptions and fumbles being wiped out because of a defensive penalty). Most of the time, there isn't an opportunity to do so and the play merely ends. Sometimes, the punting team doesn't pay attention and a savvy player can scoop up the touched ball and run with it.






            share|improve this answer




















            • Many punts are downed by the punting team (see punts that travel inside the 20, for example). This may be considered an "illegal catch or recovery" in the rules, but I am uncertain that this is "technically a penalty."
              – just curious
              27 mins ago










            • Okay, I see I was assuming the play where the ball merely touches a player on the punting team first, not a catch or "possession". You'll see commentators remark how an illegal touch is a free play for the receiving team because it's a penalty that the refs don't throw the flag on. If they gain yardage, they can "decline" the penalty and get that yardage, but if they lose yardage or a turnover happens, they get the ball at the point of the touch (or spot of the foul).
              – pboss3010
              17 mins ago










            Your Answer







            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "411"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            E. Sommer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsports.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f20237%2fwhy-does-the-game-stop-after-the-kicking-team-catches-a-punt%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            This is covered in Rule 9, Section 3, Article 2, Item 2 of the NFL Rules.




            Illegal Catch or Recovery. If the kickers catch or recover a kick beyond the line that has not been touched beyond the line by the receiving team, the ball is dead, and it is first-and-10 for the receivers at the spot of catch or recovery.




            In your scenario, the ball is dead because the punting team recovered a kick beyond the line of scrimmage without the receiving team touching the ball. Note that this is different from a kick-off, which can be recovered by the kicking team after the ball has travelled 10 yards.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            just curious is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





















              up vote
              2
              down vote



              accepted










              This is covered in Rule 9, Section 3, Article 2, Item 2 of the NFL Rules.




              Illegal Catch or Recovery. If the kickers catch or recover a kick beyond the line that has not been touched beyond the line by the receiving team, the ball is dead, and it is first-and-10 for the receivers at the spot of catch or recovery.




              In your scenario, the ball is dead because the punting team recovered a kick beyond the line of scrimmage without the receiving team touching the ball. Note that this is different from a kick-off, which can be recovered by the kicking team after the ball has travelled 10 yards.






              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              just curious is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.



















                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted






                This is covered in Rule 9, Section 3, Article 2, Item 2 of the NFL Rules.




                Illegal Catch or Recovery. If the kickers catch or recover a kick beyond the line that has not been touched beyond the line by the receiving team, the ball is dead, and it is first-and-10 for the receivers at the spot of catch or recovery.




                In your scenario, the ball is dead because the punting team recovered a kick beyond the line of scrimmage without the receiving team touching the ball. Note that this is different from a kick-off, which can be recovered by the kicking team after the ball has travelled 10 yards.






                share|improve this answer










                New contributor




                just curious is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                This is covered in Rule 9, Section 3, Article 2, Item 2 of the NFL Rules.




                Illegal Catch or Recovery. If the kickers catch or recover a kick beyond the line that has not been touched beyond the line by the receiving team, the ball is dead, and it is first-and-10 for the receivers at the spot of catch or recovery.




                In your scenario, the ball is dead because the punting team recovered a kick beyond the line of scrimmage without the receiving team touching the ball. Note that this is different from a kick-off, which can be recovered by the kicking team after the ball has travelled 10 yards.







                share|improve this answer










                New contributor




                just curious is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 22 mins ago









                Philip Kendall♦

                16.5k22452




                16.5k22452






                New contributor




                just curious is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                answered 1 hour ago









                just curious

                676




                676




                New contributor




                just curious is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                New contributor





                just curious is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                just curious is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote













                    If I understand your question correctly, you're asking why play stops if the punting team touches the ball. This is because it is technically a penalty for illegal touching for the punting team to touch the ball on a punt first.



                    Now, because it is a penalty, the receiving team is in fact allowed to advance the ball if it merely touched and not "downed", and anything bad that happens is null (similar to interceptions and fumbles being wiped out because of a defensive penalty). Most of the time, there isn't an opportunity to do so and the play merely ends. Sometimes, the punting team doesn't pay attention and a savvy player can scoop up the touched ball and run with it.






                    share|improve this answer




















                    • Many punts are downed by the punting team (see punts that travel inside the 20, for example). This may be considered an "illegal catch or recovery" in the rules, but I am uncertain that this is "technically a penalty."
                      – just curious
                      27 mins ago










                    • Okay, I see I was assuming the play where the ball merely touches a player on the punting team first, not a catch or "possession". You'll see commentators remark how an illegal touch is a free play for the receiving team because it's a penalty that the refs don't throw the flag on. If they gain yardage, they can "decline" the penalty and get that yardage, but if they lose yardage or a turnover happens, they get the ball at the point of the touch (or spot of the foul).
                      – pboss3010
                      17 mins ago














                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote













                    If I understand your question correctly, you're asking why play stops if the punting team touches the ball. This is because it is technically a penalty for illegal touching for the punting team to touch the ball on a punt first.



                    Now, because it is a penalty, the receiving team is in fact allowed to advance the ball if it merely touched and not "downed", and anything bad that happens is null (similar to interceptions and fumbles being wiped out because of a defensive penalty). Most of the time, there isn't an opportunity to do so and the play merely ends. Sometimes, the punting team doesn't pay attention and a savvy player can scoop up the touched ball and run with it.






                    share|improve this answer




















                    • Many punts are downed by the punting team (see punts that travel inside the 20, for example). This may be considered an "illegal catch or recovery" in the rules, but I am uncertain that this is "technically a penalty."
                      – just curious
                      27 mins ago










                    • Okay, I see I was assuming the play where the ball merely touches a player on the punting team first, not a catch or "possession". You'll see commentators remark how an illegal touch is a free play for the receiving team because it's a penalty that the refs don't throw the flag on. If they gain yardage, they can "decline" the penalty and get that yardage, but if they lose yardage or a turnover happens, they get the ball at the point of the touch (or spot of the foul).
                      – pboss3010
                      17 mins ago












                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote









                    If I understand your question correctly, you're asking why play stops if the punting team touches the ball. This is because it is technically a penalty for illegal touching for the punting team to touch the ball on a punt first.



                    Now, because it is a penalty, the receiving team is in fact allowed to advance the ball if it merely touched and not "downed", and anything bad that happens is null (similar to interceptions and fumbles being wiped out because of a defensive penalty). Most of the time, there isn't an opportunity to do so and the play merely ends. Sometimes, the punting team doesn't pay attention and a savvy player can scoop up the touched ball and run with it.






                    share|improve this answer












                    If I understand your question correctly, you're asking why play stops if the punting team touches the ball. This is because it is technically a penalty for illegal touching for the punting team to touch the ball on a punt first.



                    Now, because it is a penalty, the receiving team is in fact allowed to advance the ball if it merely touched and not "downed", and anything bad that happens is null (similar to interceptions and fumbles being wiped out because of a defensive penalty). Most of the time, there isn't an opportunity to do so and the play merely ends. Sometimes, the punting team doesn't pay attention and a savvy player can scoop up the touched ball and run with it.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 36 mins ago









                    pboss3010

                    2114




                    2114











                    • Many punts are downed by the punting team (see punts that travel inside the 20, for example). This may be considered an "illegal catch or recovery" in the rules, but I am uncertain that this is "technically a penalty."
                      – just curious
                      27 mins ago










                    • Okay, I see I was assuming the play where the ball merely touches a player on the punting team first, not a catch or "possession". You'll see commentators remark how an illegal touch is a free play for the receiving team because it's a penalty that the refs don't throw the flag on. If they gain yardage, they can "decline" the penalty and get that yardage, but if they lose yardage or a turnover happens, they get the ball at the point of the touch (or spot of the foul).
                      – pboss3010
                      17 mins ago
















                    • Many punts are downed by the punting team (see punts that travel inside the 20, for example). This may be considered an "illegal catch or recovery" in the rules, but I am uncertain that this is "technically a penalty."
                      – just curious
                      27 mins ago










                    • Okay, I see I was assuming the play where the ball merely touches a player on the punting team first, not a catch or "possession". You'll see commentators remark how an illegal touch is a free play for the receiving team because it's a penalty that the refs don't throw the flag on. If they gain yardage, they can "decline" the penalty and get that yardage, but if they lose yardage or a turnover happens, they get the ball at the point of the touch (or spot of the foul).
                      – pboss3010
                      17 mins ago















                    Many punts are downed by the punting team (see punts that travel inside the 20, for example). This may be considered an "illegal catch or recovery" in the rules, but I am uncertain that this is "technically a penalty."
                    – just curious
                    27 mins ago




                    Many punts are downed by the punting team (see punts that travel inside the 20, for example). This may be considered an "illegal catch or recovery" in the rules, but I am uncertain that this is "technically a penalty."
                    – just curious
                    27 mins ago












                    Okay, I see I was assuming the play where the ball merely touches a player on the punting team first, not a catch or "possession". You'll see commentators remark how an illegal touch is a free play for the receiving team because it's a penalty that the refs don't throw the flag on. If they gain yardage, they can "decline" the penalty and get that yardage, but if they lose yardage or a turnover happens, they get the ball at the point of the touch (or spot of the foul).
                    – pboss3010
                    17 mins ago




                    Okay, I see I was assuming the play where the ball merely touches a player on the punting team first, not a catch or "possession". You'll see commentators remark how an illegal touch is a free play for the receiving team because it's a penalty that the refs don't throw the flag on. If they gain yardage, they can "decline" the penalty and get that yardage, but if they lose yardage or a turnover happens, they get the ball at the point of the touch (or spot of the foul).
                    – pboss3010
                    17 mins ago










                    E. Sommer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


















                    E. Sommer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    E. Sommer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    E. Sommer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsports.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f20237%2fwhy-does-the-game-stop-after-the-kicking-team-catches-a-punt%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                    Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

                    Confectionery