Mixing
If a paper gets rejected two times (in two different journals) is that a bad impression if I try to submit in a different journal?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
If a paper gets rejected two times (in two different journals) is that a bad impression if I try to submit in a different journal (different from the earlier two)?
publications journals paper-submission rejection
edited 1 hour ago
corey979
3,67541731
asked 9 hours ago
applied_math
36239
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
If a paper gets rejected two times (in two different journals) is that a bad impression if I try to submit in a different journal (different from the earlier two)?
publications journals paper-submission rejection
edited 1 hour ago
corey979
3,67541731
asked 9 hours ago
applied_math
36239
There is a reasonably high chance that at least one of the reviewers will be the same. So depending on why it was rejected the reviewer may get annoyed seeing the same paper again if you haven't addressed their concerns.
– mg4w
1 hour ago
I've been in this exact situation this year. The first journal rejected my paper after a few months I sent it, stating that it didn't attend their novelty criteria, but that it should be published elsewhere. Second journal rejected it within a few weeks with no comments on it. The third paper accepted it without any suggestion or remark. It's now published on a top-quality journal (according to my country's classification). It's also in mathematics (since your name involves math). So, relax!
– Gustavo Marra
25 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
If a paper gets rejected two times (in two different journals) is that a bad impression if I try to submit in a different journal (different from the earlier two)?
publications journals paper-submission rejection
edited 1 hour ago
corey979
3,67541731
asked 9 hours ago
applied_math
36239
If a paper gets rejected two times (in two different journals) is that a bad impression if I try to submit in a different journal (different from the earlier two)?
publications journals paper-submission rejection
publications journals paper-submission rejection
edited 1 hour ago
corey979
3,67541731
asked 9 hours ago
applied_math
36239
edited 1 hour ago
corey979
3,67541731
asked 9 hours ago
applied_math
36239
edited 1 hour ago
corey979
3,67541731
edited 1 hour ago
corey979
3,67541731
edited 1 hour ago
corey979
3,67541731
3,67541731
asked 9 hours ago
applied_math
36239
asked 9 hours ago
applied_math
36239
asked 9 hours ago
applied_math
36239
36239
There is a reasonably high chance that at least one of the reviewers will be the same. So depending on why it was rejected the reviewer may get annoyed seeing the same paper again if you haven't addressed their concerns.
– mg4w
1 hour ago
I've been in this exact situation this year. The first journal rejected my paper after a few months I sent it, stating that it didn't attend their novelty criteria, but that it should be published elsewhere. Second journal rejected it within a few weeks with no comments on it. The third paper accepted it without any suggestion or remark. It's now published on a top-quality journal (according to my country's classification). It's also in mathematics (since your name involves math). So, relax!
– Gustavo Marra
25 mins ago
add a comment |Â
There is a reasonably high chance that at least one of the reviewers will be the same. So depending on why it was rejected the reviewer may get annoyed seeing the same paper again if you haven't addressed their concerns.
– mg4w
1 hour ago
I've been in this exact situation this year. The first journal rejected my paper after a few months I sent it, stating that it didn't attend their novelty criteria, but that it should be published elsewhere. Second journal rejected it within a few weeks with no comments on it. The third paper accepted it without any suggestion or remark. It's now published on a top-quality journal (according to my country's classification). It's also in mathematics (since your name involves math). So, relax!
– Gustavo Marra
25 mins ago
There is a reasonably high chance that at least one of the reviewers will be the same. So depending on why it was rejected the reviewer may get annoyed seeing the same paper again if you haven't addressed their concerns.
– mg4w
1 hour ago
There is a reasonably high chance that at least one of the reviewers will be the same. So depending on why it was rejected the reviewer may get annoyed seeing the same paper again if you haven't addressed their concerns.
– mg4w
1 hour ago
I've been in this exact situation this year. The first journal rejected my paper after a few months I sent it, stating that it didn't attend their novelty criteria, but that it should be published elsewhere. Second journal rejected it within a few weeks with no comments on it. The third paper accepted it without any suggestion or remark. It's now published on a top-quality journal (according to my country's classification). It's also in mathematics (since your name involves math). So, relax!
– Gustavo Marra
25 mins ago
I've been in this exact situation this year. The first journal rejected my paper after a few months I sent it, stating that it didn't attend their novelty criteria, but that it should be published elsewhere. Second journal rejected it within a few weeks with no comments on it. The third paper accepted it without any suggestion or remark. It's now published on a top-quality journal (according to my country's classification). It's also in mathematics (since your name involves math). So, relax!
– Gustavo Marra
25 mins ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
No. In fact most of the time you do not need to (and should not) tell the editors of the new journal that your manuscript had been rejected elsewhere.
Of course, you should figure out why your manuscript was rejected and fix the issues if possible. For example if a referee says your manuscript is not acceptable because you need twice as much data to make your claims, then you should try to get twice as much data before submitting it to another journal.
answered 8 hours ago
Allure
17.8k1260104
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
No. In fact most of the time you do not need to (and should not) tell the editors of the new journal that your manuscript had been rejected elsewhere.
Of course, you should figure out why your manuscript was rejected and fix the issues if possible. For example if a referee says your manuscript is not acceptable because you need twice as much data to make your claims, then you should try to get twice as much data before submitting it to another journal.
answered 8 hours ago
Allure
17.8k1260104
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
No. In fact most of the time you do not need to (and should not) tell the editors of the new journal that your manuscript had been rejected elsewhere.
Of course, you should figure out why your manuscript was rejected and fix the issues if possible. For example if a referee says your manuscript is not acceptable because you need twice as much data to make your claims, then you should try to get twice as much data before submitting it to another journal.
answered 8 hours ago
Allure
17.8k1260104
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
up vote
8
down vote
No. In fact most of the time you do not need to (and should not) tell the editors of the new journal that your manuscript had been rejected elsewhere.
Of course, you should figure out why your manuscript was rejected and fix the issues if possible. For example if a referee says your manuscript is not acceptable because you need twice as much data to make your claims, then you should try to get twice as much data before submitting it to another journal.
answered 8 hours ago
Allure
17.8k1260104
No. In fact most of the time you do not need to (and should not) tell the editors of the new journal that your manuscript had been rejected elsewhere.
Of course, you should figure out why your manuscript was rejected and fix the issues if possible. For example if a referee says your manuscript is not acceptable because you need twice as much data to make your claims, then you should try to get twice as much data before submitting it to another journal.
answered 8 hours ago
Allure
17.8k1260104
answered 8 hours ago
Allure
17.8k1260104
answered 8 hours ago
Allure
17.8k1260104
answered 8 hours ago
Allure
17.8k1260104
17.8k1260104
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117633%2fif-a-paper-gets-rejected-two-times-in-two-different-journals-is-that-a-bad-imp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
There is a reasonably high chance that at least one of the reviewers will be the same. So depending on why it was rejected the reviewer may get annoyed seeing the same paper again if you haven't addressed their concerns.
– mg4w
1 hour ago
I've been in this exact situation this year. The first journal rejected my paper after a few months I sent it, stating that it didn't attend their novelty criteria, but that it should be published elsewhere. Second journal rejected it within a few weeks with no comments on it. The third paper accepted it without any suggestion or remark. It's now published on a top-quality journal (according to my country's classification). It's also in mathematics (since your name involves math). So, relax!
– Gustavo Marra
25 mins ago