How do you draw a syntax tree for a sentence with a dummy subject?

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP

up vote
4
down vote

favorite

1

I encounter difficulties when drawing a syntax tree for a sentence of expletive contruction. Should I mark the dummy subject "there" as a noun? Thx

syntax syntax-trees

share|improve this question

asked 6 hours ago

Felix

211

New contributor

Felix is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

up vote
4
down vote

favorite

1

I encounter difficulties when drawing a syntax tree for a sentence of expletive contruction. Should I mark the dummy subject "there" as a noun? Thx

syntax syntax-trees

share|improve this question

asked 6 hours ago

Felix

211

New contributor

Felix is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

up vote
4
down vote

favorite

1

up vote
4
down vote

favorite

1

1

I encounter difficulties when drawing a syntax tree for a sentence of expletive contruction. Should I mark the dummy subject "there" as a noun? Thx

syntax syntax-trees

share|improve this question

asked 6 hours ago

Felix

211

New contributor

Felix is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

I encounter difficulties when drawing a syntax tree for a sentence of expletive contruction. Should I mark the dummy subject "there" as a noun? Thx

syntax syntax-trees

syntax syntax-trees

share|improve this question

asked 6 hours ago

Felix

211

New contributor

Felix is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

asked 6 hours ago

Felix

211

New contributor

Felix is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

share|improve this question

asked 6 hours ago

Felix

211

New contributor

Felix is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 6 hours ago

Felix

211

asked 6 hours ago

Felix

211

211

New contributor

Felix is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

New contributor

Felix is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

Felix is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

add a comment | 

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

up vote
2
down vote

Good question! It depends on the details of your sentence.

For sentences like "it is raining" or "there is a rhinoceros", the dummy subjects "it" and "there" act for all (syntactic) intents and purposes like noun phrases. Basically, English syntax doesn't allow a finite verb without a subject, so it adds one at the syntactic level that doesn't exist at the semantic level.

For sentences like "eat the tuba", there's no subject visible on the surface, but it's clear that one actually exists on the underlying level: for example, look at "mail the pineapple to yourself". Reflexive forms like "yourself" only show up when there's something else referring to the same thing, in a specific place in the syntax tree. So there must be a "you" in the underlying model.

For sentences like "damn you" or "bless you" (or harder expletives if you prefer), it seems like there's no syntactic subject at all—even an implicit one. For details, see the legendary paper English Sentences Without Overt Grammatical Subject by "Quang Phuc Dong" (James D. McCawley), which points out that these expletives don't act at all like normal verbs and proposes an different analysis. (Basically, these are "quasi-verbs" which don't even form standard sentences at all: they only appear in the single production "Epithet → Quasi-verb NP".)

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Draconis

7,015831

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "312"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

Felix is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

 

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29259%2fhow-do-you-draw-a-syntax-tree-for-a-sentence-with-a-dummy-subject%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name Email

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

active

oldest

votes

active

oldest

votes

up vote
2
down vote

Good question! It depends on the details of your sentence.

For sentences like "it is raining" or "there is a rhinoceros", the dummy subjects "it" and "there" act for all (syntactic) intents and purposes like noun phrases. Basically, English syntax doesn't allow a finite verb without a subject, so it adds one at the syntactic level that doesn't exist at the semantic level.

For sentences like "eat the tuba", there's no subject visible on the surface, but it's clear that one actually exists on the underlying level: for example, look at "mail the pineapple to yourself". Reflexive forms like "yourself" only show up when there's something else referring to the same thing, in a specific place in the syntax tree. So there must be a "you" in the underlying model.

For sentences like "damn you" or "bless you" (or harder expletives if you prefer), it seems like there's no syntactic subject at all—even an implicit one. For details, see the legendary paper English Sentences Without Overt Grammatical Subject by "Quang Phuc Dong" (James D. McCawley), which points out that these expletives don't act at all like normal verbs and proposes an different analysis. (Basically, these are "quasi-verbs" which don't even form standard sentences at all: they only appear in the single production "Epithet → Quasi-verb NP".)

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Draconis

7,015831

add a comment | 

up vote
2
down vote

Good question! It depends on the details of your sentence.

For sentences like "it is raining" or "there is a rhinoceros", the dummy subjects "it" and "there" act for all (syntactic) intents and purposes like noun phrases. Basically, English syntax doesn't allow a finite verb without a subject, so it adds one at the syntactic level that doesn't exist at the semantic level.

For sentences like "eat the tuba", there's no subject visible on the surface, but it's clear that one actually exists on the underlying level: for example, look at "mail the pineapple to yourself". Reflexive forms like "yourself" only show up when there's something else referring to the same thing, in a specific place in the syntax tree. So there must be a "you" in the underlying model.

For sentences like "damn you" or "bless you" (or harder expletives if you prefer), it seems like there's no syntactic subject at all—even an implicit one. For details, see the legendary paper English Sentences Without Overt Grammatical Subject by "Quang Phuc Dong" (James D. McCawley), which points out that these expletives don't act at all like normal verbs and proposes an different analysis. (Basically, these are "quasi-verbs" which don't even form standard sentences at all: they only appear in the single production "Epithet → Quasi-verb NP".)

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Draconis

7,015831

add a comment | 

up vote
2
down vote

up vote
2
down vote

Good question! It depends on the details of your sentence.

For sentences like "it is raining" or "there is a rhinoceros", the dummy subjects "it" and "there" act for all (syntactic) intents and purposes like noun phrases. Basically, English syntax doesn't allow a finite verb without a subject, so it adds one at the syntactic level that doesn't exist at the semantic level.

For sentences like "eat the tuba", there's no subject visible on the surface, but it's clear that one actually exists on the underlying level: for example, look at "mail the pineapple to yourself". Reflexive forms like "yourself" only show up when there's something else referring to the same thing, in a specific place in the syntax tree. So there must be a "you" in the underlying model.

For sentences like "damn you" or "bless you" (or harder expletives if you prefer), it seems like there's no syntactic subject at all—even an implicit one. For details, see the legendary paper English Sentences Without Overt Grammatical Subject by "Quang Phuc Dong" (James D. McCawley), which points out that these expletives don't act at all like normal verbs and proposes an different analysis. (Basically, these are "quasi-verbs" which don't even form standard sentences at all: they only appear in the single production "Epithet → Quasi-verb NP".)

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Draconis

7,015831

Good question! It depends on the details of your sentence.

For sentences like "it is raining" or "there is a rhinoceros", the dummy subjects "it" and "there" act for all (syntactic) intents and purposes like noun phrases. Basically, English syntax doesn't allow a finite verb without a subject, so it adds one at the syntactic level that doesn't exist at the semantic level.

For sentences like "eat the tuba", there's no subject visible on the surface, but it's clear that one actually exists on the underlying level: for example, look at "mail the pineapple to yourself". Reflexive forms like "yourself" only show up when there's something else referring to the same thing, in a specific place in the syntax tree. So there must be a "you" in the underlying model.

For sentences like "damn you" or "bless you" (or harder expletives if you prefer), it seems like there's no syntactic subject at all—even an implicit one. For details, see the legendary paper English Sentences Without Overt Grammatical Subject by "Quang Phuc Dong" (James D. McCawley), which points out that these expletives don't act at all like normal verbs and proposes an different analysis. (Basically, these are "quasi-verbs" which don't even form standard sentences at all: they only appear in the single production "Epithet → Quasi-verb NP".)

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Draconis

7,015831

share|improve this answer

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

Draconis

7,015831

answered 4 hours ago

Draconis

7,015831

answered 4 hours ago

Draconis

7,015831

7,015831

add a comment | 

add a comment | 

Felix is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

 

draft saved

draft discarded

Felix is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

Felix is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

Felix is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

 

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29259%2fhow-do-you-draw-a-syntax-tree-for-a-sentence-with-a-dummy-subject%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name Email

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

Name Email

Name

Email

Name Email

Name

Email