Mixing
How do you draw a syntax tree for a sentence with a dummy subject?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I encounter difficulties when drawing a syntax tree for a sentence of expletive contruction. Should I mark the dummy subject "there" as a noun? Thx
syntax syntax-trees
asked 6 hours ago
Felix
211
New contributor
Felix is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I encounter difficulties when drawing a syntax tree for a sentence of expletive contruction. Should I mark the dummy subject "there" as a noun? Thx
syntax syntax-trees
asked 6 hours ago
Felix
211
New contributor
Felix is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I encounter difficulties when drawing a syntax tree for a sentence of expletive contruction. Should I mark the dummy subject "there" as a noun? Thx
syntax syntax-trees
asked 6 hours ago
Felix
211
New contributor
Felix is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I encounter difficulties when drawing a syntax tree for a sentence of expletive contruction. Should I mark the dummy subject "there" as a noun? Thx
syntax syntax-trees
syntax syntax-trees
asked 6 hours ago
Felix
211
New contributor
Felix is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 6 hours ago
Felix
211
New contributor
Felix is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 6 hours ago
Felix
211
New contributor
Felix is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 6 hours ago
Felix
211
asked 6 hours ago
Felix
211
211
New contributor
Felix is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Felix is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Felix is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Good question! It depends on the details of your sentence.
For sentences like "it is raining" or "there is a rhinoceros", the dummy subjects "it" and "there" act for all (syntactic) intents and purposes like noun phrases. Basically, English syntax doesn't allow a finite verb without a subject, so it adds one at the syntactic level that doesn't exist at the semantic level.
For sentences like "eat the tuba", there's no subject visible on the surface, but it's clear that one actually exists on the underlying level: for example, look at "mail the pineapple to yourself". Reflexive forms like "yourself" only show up when there's something else referring to the same thing, in a specific place in the syntax tree. So there must be a "you" in the underlying model.
For sentences like "damn you" or "bless you" (or harder expletives if you prefer), it seems like there's no syntactic subject at all—even an implicit one. For details, see the legendary paper English Sentences Without Overt Grammatical Subject by "Quang Phuc Dong" (James D. McCawley), which points out that these expletives don't act at all like normal verbs and proposes an different analysis. (Basically, these are "quasi-verbs" which don't even form standard sentences at all: they only appear in the single production "Epithet → Quasi-verb NP".)
answered 4 hours ago
Draconis
7,015831
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Good question! It depends on the details of your sentence.
For sentences like "it is raining" or "there is a rhinoceros", the dummy subjects "it" and "there" act for all (syntactic) intents and purposes like noun phrases. Basically, English syntax doesn't allow a finite verb without a subject, so it adds one at the syntactic level that doesn't exist at the semantic level.
For sentences like "eat the tuba", there's no subject visible on the surface, but it's clear that one actually exists on the underlying level: for example, look at "mail the pineapple to yourself". Reflexive forms like "yourself" only show up when there's something else referring to the same thing, in a specific place in the syntax tree. So there must be a "you" in the underlying model.
For sentences like "damn you" or "bless you" (or harder expletives if you prefer), it seems like there's no syntactic subject at all—even an implicit one. For details, see the legendary paper English Sentences Without Overt Grammatical Subject by "Quang Phuc Dong" (James D. McCawley), which points out that these expletives don't act at all like normal verbs and proposes an different analysis. (Basically, these are "quasi-verbs" which don't even form standard sentences at all: they only appear in the single production "Epithet → Quasi-verb NP".)
answered 4 hours ago
Draconis
7,015831
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Good question! It depends on the details of your sentence.
For sentences like "it is raining" or "there is a rhinoceros", the dummy subjects "it" and "there" act for all (syntactic) intents and purposes like noun phrases. Basically, English syntax doesn't allow a finite verb without a subject, so it adds one at the syntactic level that doesn't exist at the semantic level.
For sentences like "eat the tuba", there's no subject visible on the surface, but it's clear that one actually exists on the underlying level: for example, look at "mail the pineapple to yourself". Reflexive forms like "yourself" only show up when there's something else referring to the same thing, in a specific place in the syntax tree. So there must be a "you" in the underlying model.
For sentences like "damn you" or "bless you" (or harder expletives if you prefer), it seems like there's no syntactic subject at all—even an implicit one. For details, see the legendary paper English Sentences Without Overt Grammatical Subject by "Quang Phuc Dong" (James D. McCawley), which points out that these expletives don't act at all like normal verbs and proposes an different analysis. (Basically, these are "quasi-verbs" which don't even form standard sentences at all: they only appear in the single production "Epithet → Quasi-verb NP".)
answered 4 hours ago
Draconis
7,015831
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Good question! It depends on the details of your sentence.
For sentences like "it is raining" or "there is a rhinoceros", the dummy subjects "it" and "there" act for all (syntactic) intents and purposes like noun phrases. Basically, English syntax doesn't allow a finite verb without a subject, so it adds one at the syntactic level that doesn't exist at the semantic level.
For sentences like "eat the tuba", there's no subject visible on the surface, but it's clear that one actually exists on the underlying level: for example, look at "mail the pineapple to yourself". Reflexive forms like "yourself" only show up when there's something else referring to the same thing, in a specific place in the syntax tree. So there must be a "you" in the underlying model.
For sentences like "damn you" or "bless you" (or harder expletives if you prefer), it seems like there's no syntactic subject at all—even an implicit one. For details, see the legendary paper English Sentences Without Overt Grammatical Subject by "Quang Phuc Dong" (James D. McCawley), which points out that these expletives don't act at all like normal verbs and proposes an different analysis. (Basically, these are "quasi-verbs" which don't even form standard sentences at all: they only appear in the single production "Epithet → Quasi-verb NP".)
answered 4 hours ago
Draconis
7,015831
Good question! It depends on the details of your sentence.
For sentences like "it is raining" or "there is a rhinoceros", the dummy subjects "it" and "there" act for all (syntactic) intents and purposes like noun phrases. Basically, English syntax doesn't allow a finite verb without a subject, so it adds one at the syntactic level that doesn't exist at the semantic level.
For sentences like "eat the tuba", there's no subject visible on the surface, but it's clear that one actually exists on the underlying level: for example, look at "mail the pineapple to yourself". Reflexive forms like "yourself" only show up when there's something else referring to the same thing, in a specific place in the syntax tree. So there must be a "you" in the underlying model.
For sentences like "damn you" or "bless you" (or harder expletives if you prefer), it seems like there's no syntactic subject at all—even an implicit one. For details, see the legendary paper English Sentences Without Overt Grammatical Subject by "Quang Phuc Dong" (James D. McCawley), which points out that these expletives don't act at all like normal verbs and proposes an different analysis. (Basically, these are "quasi-verbs" which don't even form standard sentences at all: they only appear in the single production "Epithet → Quasi-verb NP".)
answered 4 hours ago
Draconis
7,015831
answered 4 hours ago
Draconis
7,015831
answered 4 hours ago
Draconis
7,015831
answered 4 hours ago
Draconis
7,015831
7,015831
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Felix is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Felix is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Felix is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Felix is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29259%2fhow-do-you-draw-a-syntax-tree-for-a-sentence-with-a-dummy-subject%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
