What skill proficiency might apply if a player were attempting to teach a class at a university?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
2
down vote

favorite












A lore bard in our party is going for a Dr. Jones feel and wishes to share some of his aquired knowledge of other cultures at a gathering of scribes. There is not a specific desired outcome, and it's not really a part of the campaign - but it'll be fun side story for this player to connect his character to the world around him.



I thought of using this as an opportunity for the bard to gain some renown or support from the learned of the land. Over time the bard could progress from interesting, to credible, to trusted in academic circles - much like a background feature might be used.



So, is there a skill that the rules would indicate could be used to add a proficiency bonus against a progressively more difficult DC check to gain renown with academics? The bard currently has proficiency in History and Persuasion. He may get Performace later on.










share|improve this question





















  • is he just reciting information (intelligence), or is he making some kind of assessment about the information (wisdom)?
    – ravery
    1 hour ago










  • He's recounting information, seeking to impress the scribes, and attempting to gain their positive regard. So, history, performance (maybe), and persuasion could apply in my mind.
    – HenryWLee1066
    1 hour ago

















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












A lore bard in our party is going for a Dr. Jones feel and wishes to share some of his aquired knowledge of other cultures at a gathering of scribes. There is not a specific desired outcome, and it's not really a part of the campaign - but it'll be fun side story for this player to connect his character to the world around him.



I thought of using this as an opportunity for the bard to gain some renown or support from the learned of the land. Over time the bard could progress from interesting, to credible, to trusted in academic circles - much like a background feature might be used.



So, is there a skill that the rules would indicate could be used to add a proficiency bonus against a progressively more difficult DC check to gain renown with academics? The bard currently has proficiency in History and Persuasion. He may get Performace later on.










share|improve this question





















  • is he just reciting information (intelligence), or is he making some kind of assessment about the information (wisdom)?
    – ravery
    1 hour ago










  • He's recounting information, seeking to impress the scribes, and attempting to gain their positive regard. So, history, performance (maybe), and persuasion could apply in my mind.
    – HenryWLee1066
    1 hour ago













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











A lore bard in our party is going for a Dr. Jones feel and wishes to share some of his aquired knowledge of other cultures at a gathering of scribes. There is not a specific desired outcome, and it's not really a part of the campaign - but it'll be fun side story for this player to connect his character to the world around him.



I thought of using this as an opportunity for the bard to gain some renown or support from the learned of the land. Over time the bard could progress from interesting, to credible, to trusted in academic circles - much like a background feature might be used.



So, is there a skill that the rules would indicate could be used to add a proficiency bonus against a progressively more difficult DC check to gain renown with academics? The bard currently has proficiency in History and Persuasion. He may get Performace later on.










share|improve this question













A lore bard in our party is going for a Dr. Jones feel and wishes to share some of his aquired knowledge of other cultures at a gathering of scribes. There is not a specific desired outcome, and it's not really a part of the campaign - but it'll be fun side story for this player to connect his character to the world around him.



I thought of using this as an opportunity for the bard to gain some renown or support from the learned of the land. Over time the bard could progress from interesting, to credible, to trusted in academic circles - much like a background feature might be used.



So, is there a skill that the rules would indicate could be used to add a proficiency bonus against a progressively more difficult DC check to gain renown with academics? The bard currently has proficiency in History and Persuasion. He may get Performace later on.







dnd-5e skills






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









HenryWLee1066

35812




35812











  • is he just reciting information (intelligence), or is he making some kind of assessment about the information (wisdom)?
    – ravery
    1 hour ago










  • He's recounting information, seeking to impress the scribes, and attempting to gain their positive regard. So, history, performance (maybe), and persuasion could apply in my mind.
    – HenryWLee1066
    1 hour ago

















  • is he just reciting information (intelligence), or is he making some kind of assessment about the information (wisdom)?
    – ravery
    1 hour ago










  • He's recounting information, seeking to impress the scribes, and attempting to gain their positive regard. So, history, performance (maybe), and persuasion could apply in my mind.
    – HenryWLee1066
    1 hour ago
















is he just reciting information (intelligence), or is he making some kind of assessment about the information (wisdom)?
– ravery
1 hour ago




is he just reciting information (intelligence), or is he making some kind of assessment about the information (wisdom)?
– ravery
1 hour ago












He's recounting information, seeking to impress the scribes, and attempting to gain their positive regard. So, history, performance (maybe), and persuasion could apply in my mind.
– HenryWLee1066
1 hour ago





He's recounting information, seeking to impress the scribes, and attempting to gain their positive regard. So, history, performance (maybe), and persuasion could apply in my mind.
– HenryWLee1066
1 hour ago











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













Whatever skill would cover the material, but use Charisma.



Just about any subject studied at a university should fit into History, Arcana, Religion, Medicine, Nature, or Performance.



Of course we all know there's a difference between being an expert in the subject and being able to teach effectively. The difference between a Remus Lupin and a Severus Snape, in game terms, is that Lupin has higher Charisma (and Snape probably has higher Intelligence). This is a great use for the "Skills with different abilities" optional rule in the PHB. Getting your facts right is Intelligence (History) but getting your audience to care is Charisma (History).






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Have you considered using the downtime rules from Xanathar's Guide to Everything?



    Carousing - Use Persuasion



    The idea of carousing is that a character is spending time socializing with some people. After a week, they take a Charisma(Persuasion) check. The higher their total the more contacts they make. These contacts can be called on for favors later.



    You could of course change the check to something that matches the flavor of being an academic, but Persuasion works out-of-the-box.






    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      There are general guidelines for skills on p.174 of the PHB; however, determining which skills and abilities apply to a given task is largely up to DM discretion.



      In your case, I see three core actions being performed repeatedly by your scholar:



      • Gather information: depending on the type of information; History, Investigation, and Religion may apply.


      • Present this information to colleagues: Performance and Insight may apply as he is attempting to capture interest by presenting interesting/novel information


      • Acquire support of colleagues: Persuasion is a definite here as he is attempting to gather support to increase his fame/standing.


      Note: these are just my recommendations. As the DM, you are free to decide if an unusual skill/ability combination applies to a given action.






      share|improve this answer



























        up vote
        0
        down vote













        As an academic myself, I can tell you that to gain reputation in academic circles, two things are needed. First, you must be able to demonstrate expertise in the relevant fields. Second, you must convince the people involved that you are worth having around and that you are a good fit for various positions, an activity which falls under the umbrella of 'networking'.



        Academic Expertise



        (I provide an answer here that is somewhat broader than the specific scenario of 'knowledge of other cultures' presented in the body of the question, to cover similar situations for future readers.)



        Demonstrating your expertise in an academic field is definitely an Intelligence check of some description. The exact skill associated with the check depends on what kind of academics you are trying to impress. Looking through the Intelligence-based skills, I find the following relevant skills.



        Intelligence (Arcana) will impress wizards and researchers of magic.



        Intelligence (History) will impress historians, geographers (of the human society type), archaeologists and politicians. In the specific scenario presented in the question (knowledge of other cultures), this appears to be the most relevant.



        Intelligence (Medicine) will impress doctors and physicians.



        Intelligence (Nature) will impress zoologists, geographers (of the natural environment type) and botanists.



        Intelligence (Religion) will impress theologians and clergy. If the 'knowledge of other cultures' in your particular scenario is religious in nature, then this skill would apply.



        (I omit Intelligence (Investigation), because that represents your ability to find information, rather than any particular knowledge base.)



        You may also consider making an Intelligence check with a non-Intelligence skill. If your target audience are more arts than science, and are impressed by flowery words and well-constructed essays rather than specific knowledge, then Intelligence (Persuasion) might be an appropriate check to write impressive essays. If you want to impress some zoologists but don't have Nature proficiency, then Intelligence (Animal Handling) may work instead.



        If you want to impress a specific group not covered by these fields, we need to decide whether proficiency applies to the check.



        Proficiency in a particular set of tools may be relevant. Proficiency in navigator's tools or cartographer's tools would probably let you add your proficiency bonus to an Intelligence check to impress geographers, depending on the circumstances and how 'applied' as opposed to 'theoretical' these academics are.



        But not every academic trade would have a set of corresponding tools. For concreteness, suppose you wish to impress some mathematicians. There is no Intelligence (Mathematics) field in D&D 5e, and neither is there a set of Mathematician's Tools, but hope is not lost. One might argue that proficiency in a gaming set gives you the numerical background to talk mathematics. Or you might argue that your studies of the arcane also covered mathematics, allowing you to add proficiency from Arcana.



        If neither of your existing proficiencies match, consider the Skill Variants in DMG p.264 which suggest using Backgrounds or Personality Traits to determine proficiency rather than a fixed set of skills. Even if you are using the standard Skill rules, Backgrounds and Personality Traits are still a good match for determining proficiency for checks which do not fall under any particular Skill, or which are highly specialised. For instance, in my current game, I have a barbarian who has a background as a farmer. Although she lacks proficiency in the Nature skill, I would allow her to take proficiency on checks specifically related to agriculture and farming; such cases are sufficiently specialised to not be unbalanced. In this mathematics example, if your character has the Sage background or similar and has studied mathematics in their back-story, then it would be reasonable for them to add their proficiency bonus to impressing mathematicians.



        If, after all this, you still don't have proficiency in impressing the academic circle you want to impress, then you can always make an Intelligence check without proficiency. Being a bard, you still get to add half your proficiency bonus anyway due to your Jack of All Trades feature.



        I would not allow a check with proficiency to impress generic academic expertise upon an audience, because there is no such thing as generic academic expertise. At best, you could make a straight Intelligence check (affected by Jack of All Trades, of course), although I would advise against this. For optimum results, pick a particular field (or fields) you want to specialise in, and focus your efforts there. Hypothetically, you could target all fields individually, but I would make reputation in each field separate.



        Networking



        Academic expertise is a necessary but not sufficient condition to increase your reputation. The adage "It's not what you know, but who you know" is just as true in academic circles as it is elsewhere.



        To go up in reputation, get positions of tenure and receive invitations to future conferences, people need to like you and know you. Achieving this in D&D will involve Charisma checks.



        There are several contexts in which Charisma checks are appropriate. If you are presenting a talk, that is a Charisma check. Charisma (Performance) is the skill most suited to giving a speech for an audience, but Charisma (Persuasion) could also be used.



        Your character would also be chatting and socialising with the academics before and after any presentations. This fits under the Carousing rules mentioned by indigochild, and requires the use of Charisma (Persuasion).



        Bringing it together



        If I were to run this, I would request an appropriate Intelligence check to ensure that you had the correct knowledge and academic expertise, followed by a Charisma check or two to impress the academics. I might apply a bonus to or adjust the DC of the Charisma checks depending on the outcome of the Intelligence check.



        If the choice of skill to use for a particular check is not obvious, I would ask the player to persuade me as the GM which skill should be used and whether proficiency applies. This can see some creative uses of skills and takes some of the burden off the GM.





        share








        New contributor




        BBeast is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.

















          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f132664%2fwhat-skill-proficiency-might-apply-if-a-player-were-attempting-to-teach-a-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes








          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote













          Whatever skill would cover the material, but use Charisma.



          Just about any subject studied at a university should fit into History, Arcana, Religion, Medicine, Nature, or Performance.



          Of course we all know there's a difference between being an expert in the subject and being able to teach effectively. The difference between a Remus Lupin and a Severus Snape, in game terms, is that Lupin has higher Charisma (and Snape probably has higher Intelligence). This is a great use for the "Skills with different abilities" optional rule in the PHB. Getting your facts right is Intelligence (History) but getting your audience to care is Charisma (History).






          share|improve this answer
























            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Whatever skill would cover the material, but use Charisma.



            Just about any subject studied at a university should fit into History, Arcana, Religion, Medicine, Nature, or Performance.



            Of course we all know there's a difference between being an expert in the subject and being able to teach effectively. The difference between a Remus Lupin and a Severus Snape, in game terms, is that Lupin has higher Charisma (and Snape probably has higher Intelligence). This is a great use for the "Skills with different abilities" optional rule in the PHB. Getting your facts right is Intelligence (History) but getting your audience to care is Charisma (History).






            share|improve this answer






















              up vote
              2
              down vote










              up vote
              2
              down vote









              Whatever skill would cover the material, but use Charisma.



              Just about any subject studied at a university should fit into History, Arcana, Religion, Medicine, Nature, or Performance.



              Of course we all know there's a difference between being an expert in the subject and being able to teach effectively. The difference between a Remus Lupin and a Severus Snape, in game terms, is that Lupin has higher Charisma (and Snape probably has higher Intelligence). This is a great use for the "Skills with different abilities" optional rule in the PHB. Getting your facts right is Intelligence (History) but getting your audience to care is Charisma (History).






              share|improve this answer












              Whatever skill would cover the material, but use Charisma.



              Just about any subject studied at a university should fit into History, Arcana, Religion, Medicine, Nature, or Performance.



              Of course we all know there's a difference between being an expert in the subject and being able to teach effectively. The difference between a Remus Lupin and a Severus Snape, in game terms, is that Lupin has higher Charisma (and Snape probably has higher Intelligence). This is a great use for the "Skills with different abilities" optional rule in the PHB. Getting your facts right is Intelligence (History) but getting your audience to care is Charisma (History).







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 27 mins ago









              Mark Wells

              3,209927




              3,209927






















                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote













                  Have you considered using the downtime rules from Xanathar's Guide to Everything?



                  Carousing - Use Persuasion



                  The idea of carousing is that a character is spending time socializing with some people. After a week, they take a Charisma(Persuasion) check. The higher their total the more contacts they make. These contacts can be called on for favors later.



                  You could of course change the check to something that matches the flavor of being an academic, but Persuasion works out-of-the-box.






                  share|improve this answer
























                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote













                    Have you considered using the downtime rules from Xanathar's Guide to Everything?



                    Carousing - Use Persuasion



                    The idea of carousing is that a character is spending time socializing with some people. After a week, they take a Charisma(Persuasion) check. The higher their total the more contacts they make. These contacts can be called on for favors later.



                    You could of course change the check to something that matches the flavor of being an academic, but Persuasion works out-of-the-box.






                    share|improve this answer






















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote









                      Have you considered using the downtime rules from Xanathar's Guide to Everything?



                      Carousing - Use Persuasion



                      The idea of carousing is that a character is spending time socializing with some people. After a week, they take a Charisma(Persuasion) check. The higher their total the more contacts they make. These contacts can be called on for favors later.



                      You could of course change the check to something that matches the flavor of being an academic, but Persuasion works out-of-the-box.






                      share|improve this answer












                      Have you considered using the downtime rules from Xanathar's Guide to Everything?



                      Carousing - Use Persuasion



                      The idea of carousing is that a character is spending time socializing with some people. After a week, they take a Charisma(Persuasion) check. The higher their total the more contacts they make. These contacts can be called on for favors later.



                      You could of course change the check to something that matches the flavor of being an academic, but Persuasion works out-of-the-box.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 1 hour ago









                      indigochild

                      5,21511443




                      5,21511443




















                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          There are general guidelines for skills on p.174 of the PHB; however, determining which skills and abilities apply to a given task is largely up to DM discretion.



                          In your case, I see three core actions being performed repeatedly by your scholar:



                          • Gather information: depending on the type of information; History, Investigation, and Religion may apply.


                          • Present this information to colleagues: Performance and Insight may apply as he is attempting to capture interest by presenting interesting/novel information


                          • Acquire support of colleagues: Persuasion is a definite here as he is attempting to gather support to increase his fame/standing.


                          Note: these are just my recommendations. As the DM, you are free to decide if an unusual skill/ability combination applies to a given action.






                          share|improve this answer
























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote













                            There are general guidelines for skills on p.174 of the PHB; however, determining which skills and abilities apply to a given task is largely up to DM discretion.



                            In your case, I see three core actions being performed repeatedly by your scholar:



                            • Gather information: depending on the type of information; History, Investigation, and Religion may apply.


                            • Present this information to colleagues: Performance and Insight may apply as he is attempting to capture interest by presenting interesting/novel information


                            • Acquire support of colleagues: Persuasion is a definite here as he is attempting to gather support to increase his fame/standing.


                            Note: these are just my recommendations. As the DM, you are free to decide if an unusual skill/ability combination applies to a given action.






                            share|improve this answer






















                              up vote
                              1
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              1
                              down vote









                              There are general guidelines for skills on p.174 of the PHB; however, determining which skills and abilities apply to a given task is largely up to DM discretion.



                              In your case, I see three core actions being performed repeatedly by your scholar:



                              • Gather information: depending on the type of information; History, Investigation, and Religion may apply.


                              • Present this information to colleagues: Performance and Insight may apply as he is attempting to capture interest by presenting interesting/novel information


                              • Acquire support of colleagues: Persuasion is a definite here as he is attempting to gather support to increase his fame/standing.


                              Note: these are just my recommendations. As the DM, you are free to decide if an unusual skill/ability combination applies to a given action.






                              share|improve this answer












                              There are general guidelines for skills on p.174 of the PHB; however, determining which skills and abilities apply to a given task is largely up to DM discretion.



                              In your case, I see three core actions being performed repeatedly by your scholar:



                              • Gather information: depending on the type of information; History, Investigation, and Religion may apply.


                              • Present this information to colleagues: Performance and Insight may apply as he is attempting to capture interest by presenting interesting/novel information


                              • Acquire support of colleagues: Persuasion is a definite here as he is attempting to gather support to increase his fame/standing.


                              Note: these are just my recommendations. As the DM, you are free to decide if an unusual skill/ability combination applies to a given action.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered 41 mins ago









                              ravery

                              5,2221842




                              5,2221842




















                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote













                                  As an academic myself, I can tell you that to gain reputation in academic circles, two things are needed. First, you must be able to demonstrate expertise in the relevant fields. Second, you must convince the people involved that you are worth having around and that you are a good fit for various positions, an activity which falls under the umbrella of 'networking'.



                                  Academic Expertise



                                  (I provide an answer here that is somewhat broader than the specific scenario of 'knowledge of other cultures' presented in the body of the question, to cover similar situations for future readers.)



                                  Demonstrating your expertise in an academic field is definitely an Intelligence check of some description. The exact skill associated with the check depends on what kind of academics you are trying to impress. Looking through the Intelligence-based skills, I find the following relevant skills.



                                  Intelligence (Arcana) will impress wizards and researchers of magic.



                                  Intelligence (History) will impress historians, geographers (of the human society type), archaeologists and politicians. In the specific scenario presented in the question (knowledge of other cultures), this appears to be the most relevant.



                                  Intelligence (Medicine) will impress doctors and physicians.



                                  Intelligence (Nature) will impress zoologists, geographers (of the natural environment type) and botanists.



                                  Intelligence (Religion) will impress theologians and clergy. If the 'knowledge of other cultures' in your particular scenario is religious in nature, then this skill would apply.



                                  (I omit Intelligence (Investigation), because that represents your ability to find information, rather than any particular knowledge base.)



                                  You may also consider making an Intelligence check with a non-Intelligence skill. If your target audience are more arts than science, and are impressed by flowery words and well-constructed essays rather than specific knowledge, then Intelligence (Persuasion) might be an appropriate check to write impressive essays. If you want to impress some zoologists but don't have Nature proficiency, then Intelligence (Animal Handling) may work instead.



                                  If you want to impress a specific group not covered by these fields, we need to decide whether proficiency applies to the check.



                                  Proficiency in a particular set of tools may be relevant. Proficiency in navigator's tools or cartographer's tools would probably let you add your proficiency bonus to an Intelligence check to impress geographers, depending on the circumstances and how 'applied' as opposed to 'theoretical' these academics are.



                                  But not every academic trade would have a set of corresponding tools. For concreteness, suppose you wish to impress some mathematicians. There is no Intelligence (Mathematics) field in D&D 5e, and neither is there a set of Mathematician's Tools, but hope is not lost. One might argue that proficiency in a gaming set gives you the numerical background to talk mathematics. Or you might argue that your studies of the arcane also covered mathematics, allowing you to add proficiency from Arcana.



                                  If neither of your existing proficiencies match, consider the Skill Variants in DMG p.264 which suggest using Backgrounds or Personality Traits to determine proficiency rather than a fixed set of skills. Even if you are using the standard Skill rules, Backgrounds and Personality Traits are still a good match for determining proficiency for checks which do not fall under any particular Skill, or which are highly specialised. For instance, in my current game, I have a barbarian who has a background as a farmer. Although she lacks proficiency in the Nature skill, I would allow her to take proficiency on checks specifically related to agriculture and farming; such cases are sufficiently specialised to not be unbalanced. In this mathematics example, if your character has the Sage background or similar and has studied mathematics in their back-story, then it would be reasonable for them to add their proficiency bonus to impressing mathematicians.



                                  If, after all this, you still don't have proficiency in impressing the academic circle you want to impress, then you can always make an Intelligence check without proficiency. Being a bard, you still get to add half your proficiency bonus anyway due to your Jack of All Trades feature.



                                  I would not allow a check with proficiency to impress generic academic expertise upon an audience, because there is no such thing as generic academic expertise. At best, you could make a straight Intelligence check (affected by Jack of All Trades, of course), although I would advise against this. For optimum results, pick a particular field (or fields) you want to specialise in, and focus your efforts there. Hypothetically, you could target all fields individually, but I would make reputation in each field separate.



                                  Networking



                                  Academic expertise is a necessary but not sufficient condition to increase your reputation. The adage "It's not what you know, but who you know" is just as true in academic circles as it is elsewhere.



                                  To go up in reputation, get positions of tenure and receive invitations to future conferences, people need to like you and know you. Achieving this in D&D will involve Charisma checks.



                                  There are several contexts in which Charisma checks are appropriate. If you are presenting a talk, that is a Charisma check. Charisma (Performance) is the skill most suited to giving a speech for an audience, but Charisma (Persuasion) could also be used.



                                  Your character would also be chatting and socialising with the academics before and after any presentations. This fits under the Carousing rules mentioned by indigochild, and requires the use of Charisma (Persuasion).



                                  Bringing it together



                                  If I were to run this, I would request an appropriate Intelligence check to ensure that you had the correct knowledge and academic expertise, followed by a Charisma check or two to impress the academics. I might apply a bonus to or adjust the DC of the Charisma checks depending on the outcome of the Intelligence check.



                                  If the choice of skill to use for a particular check is not obvious, I would ask the player to persuade me as the GM which skill should be used and whether proficiency applies. This can see some creative uses of skills and takes some of the burden off the GM.





                                  share








                                  New contributor




                                  BBeast is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote













                                    As an academic myself, I can tell you that to gain reputation in academic circles, two things are needed. First, you must be able to demonstrate expertise in the relevant fields. Second, you must convince the people involved that you are worth having around and that you are a good fit for various positions, an activity which falls under the umbrella of 'networking'.



                                    Academic Expertise



                                    (I provide an answer here that is somewhat broader than the specific scenario of 'knowledge of other cultures' presented in the body of the question, to cover similar situations for future readers.)



                                    Demonstrating your expertise in an academic field is definitely an Intelligence check of some description. The exact skill associated with the check depends on what kind of academics you are trying to impress. Looking through the Intelligence-based skills, I find the following relevant skills.



                                    Intelligence (Arcana) will impress wizards and researchers of magic.



                                    Intelligence (History) will impress historians, geographers (of the human society type), archaeologists and politicians. In the specific scenario presented in the question (knowledge of other cultures), this appears to be the most relevant.



                                    Intelligence (Medicine) will impress doctors and physicians.



                                    Intelligence (Nature) will impress zoologists, geographers (of the natural environment type) and botanists.



                                    Intelligence (Religion) will impress theologians and clergy. If the 'knowledge of other cultures' in your particular scenario is religious in nature, then this skill would apply.



                                    (I omit Intelligence (Investigation), because that represents your ability to find information, rather than any particular knowledge base.)



                                    You may also consider making an Intelligence check with a non-Intelligence skill. If your target audience are more arts than science, and are impressed by flowery words and well-constructed essays rather than specific knowledge, then Intelligence (Persuasion) might be an appropriate check to write impressive essays. If you want to impress some zoologists but don't have Nature proficiency, then Intelligence (Animal Handling) may work instead.



                                    If you want to impress a specific group not covered by these fields, we need to decide whether proficiency applies to the check.



                                    Proficiency in a particular set of tools may be relevant. Proficiency in navigator's tools or cartographer's tools would probably let you add your proficiency bonus to an Intelligence check to impress geographers, depending on the circumstances and how 'applied' as opposed to 'theoretical' these academics are.



                                    But not every academic trade would have a set of corresponding tools. For concreteness, suppose you wish to impress some mathematicians. There is no Intelligence (Mathematics) field in D&D 5e, and neither is there a set of Mathematician's Tools, but hope is not lost. One might argue that proficiency in a gaming set gives you the numerical background to talk mathematics. Or you might argue that your studies of the arcane also covered mathematics, allowing you to add proficiency from Arcana.



                                    If neither of your existing proficiencies match, consider the Skill Variants in DMG p.264 which suggest using Backgrounds or Personality Traits to determine proficiency rather than a fixed set of skills. Even if you are using the standard Skill rules, Backgrounds and Personality Traits are still a good match for determining proficiency for checks which do not fall under any particular Skill, or which are highly specialised. For instance, in my current game, I have a barbarian who has a background as a farmer. Although she lacks proficiency in the Nature skill, I would allow her to take proficiency on checks specifically related to agriculture and farming; such cases are sufficiently specialised to not be unbalanced. In this mathematics example, if your character has the Sage background or similar and has studied mathematics in their back-story, then it would be reasonable for them to add their proficiency bonus to impressing mathematicians.



                                    If, after all this, you still don't have proficiency in impressing the academic circle you want to impress, then you can always make an Intelligence check without proficiency. Being a bard, you still get to add half your proficiency bonus anyway due to your Jack of All Trades feature.



                                    I would not allow a check with proficiency to impress generic academic expertise upon an audience, because there is no such thing as generic academic expertise. At best, you could make a straight Intelligence check (affected by Jack of All Trades, of course), although I would advise against this. For optimum results, pick a particular field (or fields) you want to specialise in, and focus your efforts there. Hypothetically, you could target all fields individually, but I would make reputation in each field separate.



                                    Networking



                                    Academic expertise is a necessary but not sufficient condition to increase your reputation. The adage "It's not what you know, but who you know" is just as true in academic circles as it is elsewhere.



                                    To go up in reputation, get positions of tenure and receive invitations to future conferences, people need to like you and know you. Achieving this in D&D will involve Charisma checks.



                                    There are several contexts in which Charisma checks are appropriate. If you are presenting a talk, that is a Charisma check. Charisma (Performance) is the skill most suited to giving a speech for an audience, but Charisma (Persuasion) could also be used.



                                    Your character would also be chatting and socialising with the academics before and after any presentations. This fits under the Carousing rules mentioned by indigochild, and requires the use of Charisma (Persuasion).



                                    Bringing it together



                                    If I were to run this, I would request an appropriate Intelligence check to ensure that you had the correct knowledge and academic expertise, followed by a Charisma check or two to impress the academics. I might apply a bonus to or adjust the DC of the Charisma checks depending on the outcome of the Intelligence check.



                                    If the choice of skill to use for a particular check is not obvious, I would ask the player to persuade me as the GM which skill should be used and whether proficiency applies. This can see some creative uses of skills and takes some of the burden off the GM.





                                    share








                                    New contributor




                                    BBeast is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.



















                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote










                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote









                                      As an academic myself, I can tell you that to gain reputation in academic circles, two things are needed. First, you must be able to demonstrate expertise in the relevant fields. Second, you must convince the people involved that you are worth having around and that you are a good fit for various positions, an activity which falls under the umbrella of 'networking'.



                                      Academic Expertise



                                      (I provide an answer here that is somewhat broader than the specific scenario of 'knowledge of other cultures' presented in the body of the question, to cover similar situations for future readers.)



                                      Demonstrating your expertise in an academic field is definitely an Intelligence check of some description. The exact skill associated with the check depends on what kind of academics you are trying to impress. Looking through the Intelligence-based skills, I find the following relevant skills.



                                      Intelligence (Arcana) will impress wizards and researchers of magic.



                                      Intelligence (History) will impress historians, geographers (of the human society type), archaeologists and politicians. In the specific scenario presented in the question (knowledge of other cultures), this appears to be the most relevant.



                                      Intelligence (Medicine) will impress doctors and physicians.



                                      Intelligence (Nature) will impress zoologists, geographers (of the natural environment type) and botanists.



                                      Intelligence (Religion) will impress theologians and clergy. If the 'knowledge of other cultures' in your particular scenario is religious in nature, then this skill would apply.



                                      (I omit Intelligence (Investigation), because that represents your ability to find information, rather than any particular knowledge base.)



                                      You may also consider making an Intelligence check with a non-Intelligence skill. If your target audience are more arts than science, and are impressed by flowery words and well-constructed essays rather than specific knowledge, then Intelligence (Persuasion) might be an appropriate check to write impressive essays. If you want to impress some zoologists but don't have Nature proficiency, then Intelligence (Animal Handling) may work instead.



                                      If you want to impress a specific group not covered by these fields, we need to decide whether proficiency applies to the check.



                                      Proficiency in a particular set of tools may be relevant. Proficiency in navigator's tools or cartographer's tools would probably let you add your proficiency bonus to an Intelligence check to impress geographers, depending on the circumstances and how 'applied' as opposed to 'theoretical' these academics are.



                                      But not every academic trade would have a set of corresponding tools. For concreteness, suppose you wish to impress some mathematicians. There is no Intelligence (Mathematics) field in D&D 5e, and neither is there a set of Mathematician's Tools, but hope is not lost. One might argue that proficiency in a gaming set gives you the numerical background to talk mathematics. Or you might argue that your studies of the arcane also covered mathematics, allowing you to add proficiency from Arcana.



                                      If neither of your existing proficiencies match, consider the Skill Variants in DMG p.264 which suggest using Backgrounds or Personality Traits to determine proficiency rather than a fixed set of skills. Even if you are using the standard Skill rules, Backgrounds and Personality Traits are still a good match for determining proficiency for checks which do not fall under any particular Skill, or which are highly specialised. For instance, in my current game, I have a barbarian who has a background as a farmer. Although she lacks proficiency in the Nature skill, I would allow her to take proficiency on checks specifically related to agriculture and farming; such cases are sufficiently specialised to not be unbalanced. In this mathematics example, if your character has the Sage background or similar and has studied mathematics in their back-story, then it would be reasonable for them to add their proficiency bonus to impressing mathematicians.



                                      If, after all this, you still don't have proficiency in impressing the academic circle you want to impress, then you can always make an Intelligence check without proficiency. Being a bard, you still get to add half your proficiency bonus anyway due to your Jack of All Trades feature.



                                      I would not allow a check with proficiency to impress generic academic expertise upon an audience, because there is no such thing as generic academic expertise. At best, you could make a straight Intelligence check (affected by Jack of All Trades, of course), although I would advise against this. For optimum results, pick a particular field (or fields) you want to specialise in, and focus your efforts there. Hypothetically, you could target all fields individually, but I would make reputation in each field separate.



                                      Networking



                                      Academic expertise is a necessary but not sufficient condition to increase your reputation. The adage "It's not what you know, but who you know" is just as true in academic circles as it is elsewhere.



                                      To go up in reputation, get positions of tenure and receive invitations to future conferences, people need to like you and know you. Achieving this in D&D will involve Charisma checks.



                                      There are several contexts in which Charisma checks are appropriate. If you are presenting a talk, that is a Charisma check. Charisma (Performance) is the skill most suited to giving a speech for an audience, but Charisma (Persuasion) could also be used.



                                      Your character would also be chatting and socialising with the academics before and after any presentations. This fits under the Carousing rules mentioned by indigochild, and requires the use of Charisma (Persuasion).



                                      Bringing it together



                                      If I were to run this, I would request an appropriate Intelligence check to ensure that you had the correct knowledge and academic expertise, followed by a Charisma check or two to impress the academics. I might apply a bonus to or adjust the DC of the Charisma checks depending on the outcome of the Intelligence check.



                                      If the choice of skill to use for a particular check is not obvious, I would ask the player to persuade me as the GM which skill should be used and whether proficiency applies. This can see some creative uses of skills and takes some of the burden off the GM.





                                      share








                                      New contributor




                                      BBeast is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                      As an academic myself, I can tell you that to gain reputation in academic circles, two things are needed. First, you must be able to demonstrate expertise in the relevant fields. Second, you must convince the people involved that you are worth having around and that you are a good fit for various positions, an activity which falls under the umbrella of 'networking'.



                                      Academic Expertise



                                      (I provide an answer here that is somewhat broader than the specific scenario of 'knowledge of other cultures' presented in the body of the question, to cover similar situations for future readers.)



                                      Demonstrating your expertise in an academic field is definitely an Intelligence check of some description. The exact skill associated with the check depends on what kind of academics you are trying to impress. Looking through the Intelligence-based skills, I find the following relevant skills.



                                      Intelligence (Arcana) will impress wizards and researchers of magic.



                                      Intelligence (History) will impress historians, geographers (of the human society type), archaeologists and politicians. In the specific scenario presented in the question (knowledge of other cultures), this appears to be the most relevant.



                                      Intelligence (Medicine) will impress doctors and physicians.



                                      Intelligence (Nature) will impress zoologists, geographers (of the natural environment type) and botanists.



                                      Intelligence (Religion) will impress theologians and clergy. If the 'knowledge of other cultures' in your particular scenario is religious in nature, then this skill would apply.



                                      (I omit Intelligence (Investigation), because that represents your ability to find information, rather than any particular knowledge base.)



                                      You may also consider making an Intelligence check with a non-Intelligence skill. If your target audience are more arts than science, and are impressed by flowery words and well-constructed essays rather than specific knowledge, then Intelligence (Persuasion) might be an appropriate check to write impressive essays. If you want to impress some zoologists but don't have Nature proficiency, then Intelligence (Animal Handling) may work instead.



                                      If you want to impress a specific group not covered by these fields, we need to decide whether proficiency applies to the check.



                                      Proficiency in a particular set of tools may be relevant. Proficiency in navigator's tools or cartographer's tools would probably let you add your proficiency bonus to an Intelligence check to impress geographers, depending on the circumstances and how 'applied' as opposed to 'theoretical' these academics are.



                                      But not every academic trade would have a set of corresponding tools. For concreteness, suppose you wish to impress some mathematicians. There is no Intelligence (Mathematics) field in D&D 5e, and neither is there a set of Mathematician's Tools, but hope is not lost. One might argue that proficiency in a gaming set gives you the numerical background to talk mathematics. Or you might argue that your studies of the arcane also covered mathematics, allowing you to add proficiency from Arcana.



                                      If neither of your existing proficiencies match, consider the Skill Variants in DMG p.264 which suggest using Backgrounds or Personality Traits to determine proficiency rather than a fixed set of skills. Even if you are using the standard Skill rules, Backgrounds and Personality Traits are still a good match for determining proficiency for checks which do not fall under any particular Skill, or which are highly specialised. For instance, in my current game, I have a barbarian who has a background as a farmer. Although she lacks proficiency in the Nature skill, I would allow her to take proficiency on checks specifically related to agriculture and farming; such cases are sufficiently specialised to not be unbalanced. In this mathematics example, if your character has the Sage background or similar and has studied mathematics in their back-story, then it would be reasonable for them to add their proficiency bonus to impressing mathematicians.



                                      If, after all this, you still don't have proficiency in impressing the academic circle you want to impress, then you can always make an Intelligence check without proficiency. Being a bard, you still get to add half your proficiency bonus anyway due to your Jack of All Trades feature.



                                      I would not allow a check with proficiency to impress generic academic expertise upon an audience, because there is no such thing as generic academic expertise. At best, you could make a straight Intelligence check (affected by Jack of All Trades, of course), although I would advise against this. For optimum results, pick a particular field (or fields) you want to specialise in, and focus your efforts there. Hypothetically, you could target all fields individually, but I would make reputation in each field separate.



                                      Networking



                                      Academic expertise is a necessary but not sufficient condition to increase your reputation. The adage "It's not what you know, but who you know" is just as true in academic circles as it is elsewhere.



                                      To go up in reputation, get positions of tenure and receive invitations to future conferences, people need to like you and know you. Achieving this in D&D will involve Charisma checks.



                                      There are several contexts in which Charisma checks are appropriate. If you are presenting a talk, that is a Charisma check. Charisma (Performance) is the skill most suited to giving a speech for an audience, but Charisma (Persuasion) could also be used.



                                      Your character would also be chatting and socialising with the academics before and after any presentations. This fits under the Carousing rules mentioned by indigochild, and requires the use of Charisma (Persuasion).



                                      Bringing it together



                                      If I were to run this, I would request an appropriate Intelligence check to ensure that you had the correct knowledge and academic expertise, followed by a Charisma check or two to impress the academics. I might apply a bonus to or adjust the DC of the Charisma checks depending on the outcome of the Intelligence check.



                                      If the choice of skill to use for a particular check is not obvious, I would ask the player to persuade me as the GM which skill should be used and whether proficiency applies. This can see some creative uses of skills and takes some of the burden off the GM.






                                      share








                                      New contributor




                                      BBeast is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.








                                      share


                                      share






                                      New contributor




                                      BBeast is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                      answered 5 mins ago









                                      BBeast

                                      2247




                                      2247




                                      New contributor




                                      BBeast is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                      New contributor





                                      BBeast is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                      BBeast is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.



























                                           

                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded















































                                           


                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function ()
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f132664%2fwhat-skill-proficiency-might-apply-if-a-player-were-attempting-to-teach-a-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                          );

                                          Post as a guest













































































                                          Comments

                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          What does second last employer means? [closed]

                                          Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

                                          One-line joke