Compatibility between LuaLaTeX and the transparent package

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












If I run the example below with LuaLaTeX, the transparent package doesn't load with the error: Package transparent Warning: Your pdfTeX version does not support color stacks. (a pretty clear error message)



documentclassminimal
usepackagetransparent

begindocument
transparent0.5Ciao
enddocument


I have a bunch of images generated by Inkscape which contain the transparent command, and at the moment I simply defined an empty transparent command to avoid the error, but I'd like to know if there's a better workaround to maintain the transparency.






luatex transparent







share|improve this question

















  • 1




    github.com/ho-tex/oberdiek/issues/47
    – David Carlisle
    22 hours ago














up vote
3
down vote

favorite












If I run the example below with LuaLaTeX, the transparent package doesn't load with the error: Package transparent Warning: Your pdfTeX version does not support color stacks. (a pretty clear error message)



documentclassminimal
usepackagetransparent

begindocument
transparent0.5Ciao
enddocument


I have a bunch of images generated by Inkscape which contain the transparent command, and at the moment I simply defined an empty transparent command to avoid the error, but I'd like to know if there's a better workaround to maintain the transparency.






luatex transparent







share|improve this question

















  • 1




    github.com/ho-tex/oberdiek/issues/47
    – David Carlisle
    22 hours ago












up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











If I run the example below with LuaLaTeX, the transparent package doesn't load with the error: Package transparent Warning: Your pdfTeX version does not support color stacks. (a pretty clear error message)



documentclassminimal
usepackagetransparent

begindocument
transparent0.5Ciao
enddocument


I have a bunch of images generated by Inkscape which contain the transparent command, and at the moment I simply defined an empty transparent command to avoid the error, but I'd like to know if there's a better workaround to maintain the transparency.






luatex transparent







share|improve this question













If I run the example below with LuaLaTeX, the transparent package doesn't load with the error: Package transparent Warning: Your pdfTeX version does not support color stacks. (a pretty clear error message)



documentclassminimal
usepackagetransparent

begindocument
transparent0.5Ciao
enddocument


I have a bunch of images generated by Inkscape which contain the transparent command, and at the moment I simply defined an empty transparent command to avoid the error, but I'd like to know if there's a better workaround to maintain the transparency.






luatex transparent




luatex transparent






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 22 hours ago









Massimo Ortolano

745513




745513







  • 1




    github.com/ho-tex/oberdiek/issues/47
    – David Carlisle
    22 hours ago












  • 1




    github.com/ho-tex/oberdiek/issues/47
    – David Carlisle
    22 hours ago







1




1




github.com/ho-tex/oberdiek/issues/47
– David Carlisle
22 hours ago




github.com/ho-tex/oberdiek/issues/47
– David Carlisle
22 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










You should not use minimal (see Why should the minimal class be avoided?).



Two alternatives:




  1. standalone



    documentclassstandalone
    usepackagetransparent

    begindocument
    transparent0.5Ciao
    enddocument



  2. article with the luatex85 package:



    RequirePackageluatex85
    documentclassarticle
    usepackagetransparent

    begindocument
    transparent0.5Ciao
    enddocument






share|improve this answer




















  • Thank you, but the complete document is based on another class, toptesi, which I think is based on the class report. Adding the luatex85 package in this case doesn't remove the error.
    – Massimo Ortolano
    22 hours ago










  • @MassimoOrtolano For me, it does (add the luatex85 package, remove auxiliary files, recompile twice). I'm on TL2018 with LuaLaTeX 1.07.
    – TeXnician
    22 hours ago










  • Ah, yes, with the MWE it works but not with the full document. I gotta go now, but I'll investigate more later on.
    – Massimo Ortolano
    22 hours ago










  • @MassimoOrtolano Well, I just tried with toptesi and the procedure I described does work on an MWE with that class.
    – TeXnician
    22 hours ago






  • 1




    @MassimoOrtolano You're welcome. Yes, it's good that pdfx removes that, because in PDF/X transparency is unsupported.
    – TeXnician
    19 hours ago










Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f450555%2fcompatibility-between-lualatex-and-the-transparent-package%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
4
down vote



accepted










You should not use minimal (see Why should the minimal class be avoided?).



Two alternatives:




  1. standalone



    documentclassstandalone
    usepackagetransparent

    begindocument
    transparent0.5Ciao
    enddocument



  2. article with the luatex85 package:



    RequirePackageluatex85
    documentclassarticle
    usepackagetransparent

    begindocument
    transparent0.5Ciao
    enddocument






share|improve this answer




















  • Thank you, but the complete document is based on another class, toptesi, which I think is based on the class report. Adding the luatex85 package in this case doesn't remove the error.
    – Massimo Ortolano
    22 hours ago










  • @MassimoOrtolano For me, it does (add the luatex85 package, remove auxiliary files, recompile twice). I'm on TL2018 with LuaLaTeX 1.07.
    – TeXnician
    22 hours ago










  • Ah, yes, with the MWE it works but not with the full document. I gotta go now, but I'll investigate more later on.
    – Massimo Ortolano
    22 hours ago










  • @MassimoOrtolano Well, I just tried with toptesi and the procedure I described does work on an MWE with that class.
    – TeXnician
    22 hours ago






  • 1




    @MassimoOrtolano You're welcome. Yes, it's good that pdfx removes that, because in PDF/X transparency is unsupported.
    – TeXnician
    19 hours ago














up vote
4
down vote



accepted










You should not use minimal (see Why should the minimal class be avoided?).



Two alternatives:




  1. standalone



    documentclassstandalone
    usepackagetransparent

    begindocument
    transparent0.5Ciao
    enddocument



  2. article with the luatex85 package:



    RequirePackageluatex85
    documentclassarticle
    usepackagetransparent

    begindocument
    transparent0.5Ciao
    enddocument






share|improve this answer




















  • Thank you, but the complete document is based on another class, toptesi, which I think is based on the class report. Adding the luatex85 package in this case doesn't remove the error.
    – Massimo Ortolano
    22 hours ago










  • @MassimoOrtolano For me, it does (add the luatex85 package, remove auxiliary files, recompile twice). I'm on TL2018 with LuaLaTeX 1.07.
    – TeXnician
    22 hours ago










  • Ah, yes, with the MWE it works but not with the full document. I gotta go now, but I'll investigate more later on.
    – Massimo Ortolano
    22 hours ago










  • @MassimoOrtolano Well, I just tried with toptesi and the procedure I described does work on an MWE with that class.
    – TeXnician
    22 hours ago






  • 1




    @MassimoOrtolano You're welcome. Yes, it's good that pdfx removes that, because in PDF/X transparency is unsupported.
    – TeXnician
    19 hours ago












up vote
4
down vote



accepted







up vote
4
down vote



accepted






You should not use minimal (see Why should the minimal class be avoided?).



Two alternatives:




  1. standalone



    documentclassstandalone
    usepackagetransparent

    begindocument
    transparent0.5Ciao
    enddocument



  2. article with the luatex85 package:



    RequirePackageluatex85
    documentclassarticle
    usepackagetransparent

    begindocument
    transparent0.5Ciao
    enddocument






share|improve this answer












You should not use minimal (see Why should the minimal class be avoided?).



Two alternatives:




  1. standalone



    documentclassstandalone
    usepackagetransparent

    begindocument
    transparent0.5Ciao
    enddocument



  2. article with the luatex85 package:



    RequirePackageluatex85
    documentclassarticle
    usepackagetransparent

    begindocument
    transparent0.5Ciao
    enddocument







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 22 hours ago









TeXnician

20.8k52881




20.8k52881











  • Thank you, but the complete document is based on another class, toptesi, which I think is based on the class report. Adding the luatex85 package in this case doesn't remove the error.
    – Massimo Ortolano
    22 hours ago










  • @MassimoOrtolano For me, it does (add the luatex85 package, remove auxiliary files, recompile twice). I'm on TL2018 with LuaLaTeX 1.07.
    – TeXnician
    22 hours ago










  • Ah, yes, with the MWE it works but not with the full document. I gotta go now, but I'll investigate more later on.
    – Massimo Ortolano
    22 hours ago










  • @MassimoOrtolano Well, I just tried with toptesi and the procedure I described does work on an MWE with that class.
    – TeXnician
    22 hours ago






  • 1




    @MassimoOrtolano You're welcome. Yes, it's good that pdfx removes that, because in PDF/X transparency is unsupported.
    – TeXnician
    19 hours ago
















  • Thank you, but the complete document is based on another class, toptesi, which I think is based on the class report. Adding the luatex85 package in this case doesn't remove the error.
    – Massimo Ortolano
    22 hours ago










  • @MassimoOrtolano For me, it does (add the luatex85 package, remove auxiliary files, recompile twice). I'm on TL2018 with LuaLaTeX 1.07.
    – TeXnician
    22 hours ago










  • Ah, yes, with the MWE it works but not with the full document. I gotta go now, but I'll investigate more later on.
    – Massimo Ortolano
    22 hours ago










  • @MassimoOrtolano Well, I just tried with toptesi and the procedure I described does work on an MWE with that class.
    – TeXnician
    22 hours ago






  • 1




    @MassimoOrtolano You're welcome. Yes, it's good that pdfx removes that, because in PDF/X transparency is unsupported.
    – TeXnician
    19 hours ago















Thank you, but the complete document is based on another class, toptesi, which I think is based on the class report. Adding the luatex85 package in this case doesn't remove the error.
– Massimo Ortolano
22 hours ago




Thank you, but the complete document is based on another class, toptesi, which I think is based on the class report. Adding the luatex85 package in this case doesn't remove the error.
– Massimo Ortolano
22 hours ago












@MassimoOrtolano For me, it does (add the luatex85 package, remove auxiliary files, recompile twice). I'm on TL2018 with LuaLaTeX 1.07.
– TeXnician
22 hours ago




@MassimoOrtolano For me, it does (add the luatex85 package, remove auxiliary files, recompile twice). I'm on TL2018 with LuaLaTeX 1.07.
– TeXnician
22 hours ago












Ah, yes, with the MWE it works but not with the full document. I gotta go now, but I'll investigate more later on.
– Massimo Ortolano
22 hours ago




Ah, yes, with the MWE it works but not with the full document. I gotta go now, but I'll investigate more later on.
– Massimo Ortolano
22 hours ago












@MassimoOrtolano Well, I just tried with toptesi and the procedure I described does work on an MWE with that class.
– TeXnician
22 hours ago




@MassimoOrtolano Well, I just tried with toptesi and the procedure I described does work on an MWE with that class.
– TeXnician
22 hours ago




1




1




@MassimoOrtolano You're welcome. Yes, it's good that pdfx removes that, because in PDF/X transparency is unsupported.
– TeXnician
19 hours ago




@MassimoOrtolano You're welcome. Yes, it's good that pdfx removes that, because in PDF/X transparency is unsupported.
– TeXnician
19 hours ago

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f450555%2fcompatibility-between-lualatex-and-the-transparent-package%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest
































































Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What does second last employer means? [closed]

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote -3 down vote favorite Say, for example I have worked in the following companies, Company A => 2010 - 2011 Company B => 2011 - 2012 Company C => 2012 - Till Date Company D => Have offer Now assume Company D is asking to submit documents from my second last employer. So from the list of companies given, which company would be qualified as second last employer? software-industry employer share | improve this question asked Aug 10 '14 at 5:16 Rajaprabhu Aravindasamy 559 1 6 13 closed as off-topic by Jim G., jmort253 ♦ Aug 11 '14 at 1:58 This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason: "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address...
Read more

List of Gilmore Girls characters

Image
The season three cast—(Back row): Lane, Michel, Paris, Emily, Richard, Sookie, Miss Patty, Kirk; Front row: Jess, Luke, Lorelai, Rory, Dean This is a list of characters for the comedy-drama television series Gilmore Girls . Contents 1 Main characters 1.1 Lorelai Gilmore 1.2 Rory Gilmore 1.3 Sookie St. James 1.4 Lane Kim 1.5 Michel Gerard 1.6 Luke Danes 1.7 Emily Gilmore 1.8 Richard Gilmore 1.9 Paris Geller 1.10 Dean Forester 1.11 Jess Mariano 1.12 Kirk Gleason 1.13 Jason Stiles 1.14 Logan Huntzberger 2 Major recurring characters 2.1 Christopher Hayden 2.2 Jackson Belleville 2.3 Mrs. Kim 2.4 Tristin DuGray 2.5 Max Medina 2.6 Taylor Doose 2.7 Dave Rygalski 2.8 Marty 3 Recurring characters 3.1 Stars Hollow 3.2 Chilton 3.3 Yale 3.4 Other 4 Notable guest stars 5 Unseen characters 6 Notes 7 References Main characters Actor Character Appearances Season 1 Season 2 Season 3 Season 4 Season 5 Season 6 Season 7 A Year in the Life Lauren Graham Lorelai Gilmore...
Read more

Confectionery

Image
Prepared foods made with a lot of sugar or other cabohydrates "Sweetmeat" redirects here. For the racehorse, see Sweetmeat (horse). Not to be confused with Sweetbread. This Kransekake is a traditional Scandinavian baker's confection. Confectionery is the art of making confections , which are food items that are rich in sugar and carbohydrates. Exact definitions are difficult. [1] In general, though, confectionery is divided into two broad and somewhat overlapping categories, bakers' confections and sugar confections. [2] Bakers' confectionery, also called flour confections , includes principally sweet pastries, cakes, and similar baked goods. Sugar confectionery includes candies ( sweets in British English), candied nuts, chocolates, chewing gum, bubble gum, pastillage, and other confections that are made primarily of sugar. In some cases, chocolate confections (confections made of chocolate) are treated as a separate category, as are sugar-free versions of ...
Read more