Buddhist Jhanas, how best to describe them?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












I’m conducting research into the phenomena of Buddhist Jhanas/Dhyanas, and am looking for a good place to start.



In addition to primary sources that discuss what this phenomena is, how would you describe what the Jhanas are to a person unfamiliar with any sort of meditation practice? How do they differ across different sects/schools? How are they viewed sociologically or philosophically from OUTSIDE the lens of a practitioner or one who believes in the concept of enlightenment to begin with?



TL; DR seeking primary source information on Jhanas/Dhyanas. What is their history? How do they differ across schools/sects? How would an outsider or an academic understand them?



Thank you for your time.










share|improve this question

























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    I’m conducting research into the phenomena of Buddhist Jhanas/Dhyanas, and am looking for a good place to start.



    In addition to primary sources that discuss what this phenomena is, how would you describe what the Jhanas are to a person unfamiliar with any sort of meditation practice? How do they differ across different sects/schools? How are they viewed sociologically or philosophically from OUTSIDE the lens of a practitioner or one who believes in the concept of enlightenment to begin with?



    TL; DR seeking primary source information on Jhanas/Dhyanas. What is their history? How do they differ across schools/sects? How would an outsider or an academic understand them?



    Thank you for your time.










    share|improve this question























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      I’m conducting research into the phenomena of Buddhist Jhanas/Dhyanas, and am looking for a good place to start.



      In addition to primary sources that discuss what this phenomena is, how would you describe what the Jhanas are to a person unfamiliar with any sort of meditation practice? How do they differ across different sects/schools? How are they viewed sociologically or philosophically from OUTSIDE the lens of a practitioner or one who believes in the concept of enlightenment to begin with?



      TL; DR seeking primary source information on Jhanas/Dhyanas. What is their history? How do they differ across schools/sects? How would an outsider or an academic understand them?



      Thank you for your time.










      share|improve this question













      I’m conducting research into the phenomena of Buddhist Jhanas/Dhyanas, and am looking for a good place to start.



      In addition to primary sources that discuss what this phenomena is, how would you describe what the Jhanas are to a person unfamiliar with any sort of meditation practice? How do they differ across different sects/schools? How are they viewed sociologically or philosophically from OUTSIDE the lens of a practitioner or one who believes in the concept of enlightenment to begin with?



      TL; DR seeking primary source information on Jhanas/Dhyanas. What is their history? How do they differ across schools/sects? How would an outsider or an academic understand them?



      Thank you for your time.







      meditation jhana academic-buddhism academic-study






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 8 hours ago









      ch_da_guru13

      364




      364




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote














          In addition to primary sources that discuss what this phenomena is, how would you describe what the Jhanas are to a person unfamiliar with any sort of meditation practice?




          Jhanas are the practice to pause the present unwholesome mind. While jhāna mind are arising, there are no any unwholesome mind can arise, whole hours or whole day. Jhāna is basis of insight meditation.




          How do they differ across different sects/schools?




          They are same in meditation. It just difference in a few detail.




          How are they viewed sociologically or philosophically from OUTSIDE the lens of a practitioner or one who believes in the concept of enlightenment to begin with?




          The jhāna practitioner looks very judicious, worshipful.




          TL; DR seeking primary source information on Jhanas/Dhyanas. What is their history? How do they differ across schools/sects? How would an outsider or an academic understand them?




          • Path of Purification https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/nanamoli/PathofPurification2011.pdf

          • Path of Freedom
            http://urbandharma.org/pdf1/Path_of_Freedom_Vimuttimagga.pdf

          • Pa-Auk tawya Monastery
            http://122.155.190.19/revata/index.php?option=com_sectionex&view=category&id=6&Itemid=108#catid8





          share|improve this answer





























            up vote
            1
            down vote














            In addition to primary sources that discuss what this phenomena is, how would you describe what the Jhanas are to a person unfamiliar with
            any sort of meditation practice?




            The obvious primary source is the Pali suttas, which have the following standard formula found in many suttas:




            Unflagging persistence was aroused in me, and unmuddled mindfulness established. My body was calm & unaroused, my mind concentrated &
            single. Quite withdrawn from sensuality, withdrawn from unskillful
            mental qualities, I entered & remained in the first jhana: rapture &
            pleasure born from withdrawal, accompanied by directed thought &
            evaluation. With the stilling of directed thoughts & evaluations, I
            entered & remained in the second jhana: rapture & pleasure born of
            composure, unification of awareness free from directed thought &
            evaluation — internal assurance. With the fading of rapture I remained
            in equanimity, mindful & alert, and physically sensitive of pleasure.
            I entered & remained in the third jhana, of which the noble ones
            declare, 'Equanimous & mindful, he has a pleasant abiding.' With the
            abandoning of pleasure & pain — as with the earlier disappearance of
            elation & distress — I entered & remained in the fourth jhana: purity
            of equanimity & mindfulness, neither pleasure nor pain.



            MN 4




            The 1st reference to the experience of jhana is found in MN 36, where the Buddha recollected how as a child his mind spontaneously entered jhana under the rose apple tree:




            I thought: 'I recall once, when my father the Sakyan was working, and I was sitting in the cool shade of a rose-apple tree, then — quite
            secluded from sensuality, secluded from unskillful mental qualities —
            I entered & remained in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born from
            seclusion, accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. Could that be
            the path to Awakening?' Then following on that memory came the
            realization: 'That is the path to Awakening.' I thought: 'So why am I
            afraid of that pleasure that has nothing to do with sensuality,
            nothing to do with unskillful mental qualities?' I thought: 'I am no
            longer afraid of that pleasure that has nothing to do with sensuality,
            nothing to do with unskillful mental qualities, but that pleasure is
            not easy to achieve with a body so extremely emaciated. Suppose I were
            to take some solid food: some rice & porridge.' So I took some solid
            food: some rice & porridge. Now five monks had been attending on me,
            thinking, 'If Gotama, our contemplative, achieves some higher state,
            he will tell us.' But when they saw me taking some solid food — some
            rice & porridge — they were disgusted and left me, thinking, 'Gotama
            the contemplative is living luxuriously. He has abandoned his exertion
            and is backsliding into abundance.'



            MN 36






            How do they differ across different sects/schools?




            The jhana of the Buddha is called "noble" "("ariya") "supramundane" ("lokuttara"), per MN 117, because it is developed by using "letting go" ("vossagga") of craving and ego the meditation object, as described in SN 48.10:




            And what is the faculty of concentration? There is the case where a monk, a disciple of the noble ones, making it his object to let go (vossagga),
            attains concentration, attains singleness of mind. Quite withdrawn
            from sensuality, withdrawn from unskillful mental qualities, he enters
            & remains in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born from withdrawal,
            accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. With the stilling of
            directed thoughts & evaluations, he enters & remains in the second
            jhana: rapture & pleasure born of composure, unification of awareness
            free from directed thought & evaluation — internal assurance. With the
            fading of rapture, he remains equanimous, mindful, & alert, and senses
            pleasure with the body. He enters & remains in the third jhana, of
            which the Noble Ones declare, 'Equanimous & mindful, he has a pleasant
            abiding.' With the abandoning of pleasure & pain — as with the earlier
            disappearance of elation & distress — he enters & remains in the
            fourth jhana: purity of equanimity & mindfulness, neither pleasure nor
            pain. This is called the faculty of concentration.



            SN 48.10




            The above quality of "letting go" is what distinguishes the jhana of the Buddha from other sects, including so-called Buddhist sects, which refer to false ideas such as "suppression" and use "yogic" ("Hindu") techniques such as counting, fixing and mental application (fueled by craving). Some of the false heretical jhana sects are listed below:



            • Path of Purification https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/nanamoli/PathofPurification2011.pdf


            • Path of Freedom
              http://urbandharma.org/pdf1/Path_of_Freedom_Vimuttimagga.pdf


            • Pa-Auk tawya Monastery
              http://122.155.190.19/revata/index.php?option=com_sectionex&view=category&id=6&Itemid=108#catid8



            How are they viewed sociologically or philosophically from OUTSIDE the lens of a practitioner or one who believes in the concept of
            enlightenment to begin with?




            Like most religions, OUTSIDERS view jhana in very superstitious (magical) & egoistic ways. The internet is replete with particularly Westerners who claim they (as a self or ego) have experienced jhana when they have not.




            TL; DR seeking primary source information on Jhanas/Dhyanas. What is their history? How do they differ across schools/sects? How would an
            outsider or an academic understand them?




            Academics can read books of other academics, such as A History of Mindfulness by Bhikkhu Sujato. I recommend to start with this book. Simply type "jhana" into the find function. For example:




            This psychology also emerges in the usage of the word dhī, familiar as the root of the Buddhist term ‘jhāna’. Dhī is used early on in the
            sense of ‘thought’, and has a special connection with the ‘visioning’
            of the Vedic poetry: dhī is the intuitive awareness as the poet/priest
            ‘sees’ the verses. This ‘thought’ (dhī) or ‘mind’ (manas) is
            disciplined (yoga) by the reciters. ‘The priests of him the divine
            Savitr well-skilled in hymns Harness their mind, yea, harness their
            holy thoughts.’



            But jhāna did not develop its meaning of ‘deep absorption’ until the
            Buddha. In the Bṛhadāraṇyaka, jhāna is contrasted with the stillness
            of the True Self.



            ‘Which is the Self? ‘That person here made of cognition among the senses [breaths], the light within the heart. He, remaining the same,
            wanders about the two worlds as if thinking (dhyāyati), as if playing
            (lelāyati).’



            The Upaniṣads constantly remind us to preserve the correct mental attitude; to perform the rituals with one’s whole being, contemplating
            the significance of each aspect as one carriesit out. Even the earlier
            Brahmanas allow that if a ritual cannot be carried out physically it
            may be performed by ‘faith’, i.e. as a purely mental act. In this
            immersion of awareness in one’s actions we can discern a precursor to
            the Buddhist emphasis on mindfulness through all one’s activities.



            It is a curious thing that when we look at the sources most likely to be contemporary with the Buddha​—​namely the Bṛhadāraṇyaka and the
            Chāndogya​—​we find that these well-known meditative terms are used
            less frequently, and a word apparently foreign to Buddhist meditation
            is found far more often. This word is upāsana. Edward Crangle,
            following Velkar, has studied this term in detail, and lists the
            frequency of occurrence. In the Bṛhadāraṇyaka, upāsana occurs 63
            times, jhāna thrice, and yoga twice. In the Chāndogya, upāsana occurs
            115 times, jhāna twelve times, and yoga again twice.







            share|improve this answer





























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Words don't really do jhanic experiences any justice. In the grand scheme of things, words are like tiny particles of sediment in the vast ocean of a jhanic experience. This is further compounded by the experience of formless jhanas.



              Yes, they can be described and quite creatively too. My first wakeful jhana happened last year. It spanned a period of 5 hours and it changed my whole lifestyle. They can be life changing, powerful and perhaps mystical but jhanas come and go and so not worth attaching oneself to them. No sect or school can claim any exclusivity over these wakeful states.



              Below is a description which was written last year after the event.




              The temporary awakening was devoid of any kind of grand entrance. I was out with my 7 year old who was playing. It seemed to happen whilst I was looking at the foliage in the park. The plantation took on a whole new aliveness and vibrancy. This was when I sensed an undertone that something had shifted in my consciousness. My thoughts no longer existed. Instead, they were replaced by a deep intuitive 'knowing' about the things I observed in my environment. Nothing seemed to matter because everything had a relationship through a very odd unification. When I looked at people a knowing arose in me of their discontent but at the very same time I could recognise their immense potential. From the fusion of those two seeming poles grew a deep and warm compassion for human beings. Quite a beautiful way to view people!



              The experience completely shredded my mental concepts of who I thought I had been and the structure of the world around me seems drastically different henceforth. Smaller jhanas occurred afterwards. I look at a tree stretching towards its ultimate creator - the mysterious darkness of the cosmos, the totality of consciousness itself - and it gently sways as if joyously waving at other passing lifeforms, inviting them to join in its moment of presence and symphonic rhythm of interconnectedness. Previously it was just a tree. I hardly gave them a second glance.







              share|improve this answer



























                up vote
                -1
                down vote













                I would say that Jhanas are the final stages of the progressive development of the state of inner harmony, that is the Buddhist path.



                The entire Buddhist path is based on one principle, that psychological discomfort comes from inner conflict and that therefore eliminating inner conflict leads to inner harmony. Secondarily, outer conflict leads to inner conflict, and ethical behavior is defined as that which prevents outer conflict.



                The prerequisite to Jhanas, therefore, is to eliminate all coarse conflicts that serve as obstacles to the attainment of harmony, such as external entanglements and various real life sources of personal drama and regret. Hence the emphasis on ethics, non-attachment, and non-egoism for beginners.



                Once the life of an individual is more or less peaceful on a day to day basis, the student can focus solely on their mind and attain Complete Harmony. This is the role of Jhanas.



                Jhanas are generally divided into two stages. On the first stage, student uses emotional intelligence techniques to generate a state of happiness. On the second stage, the student contemplates the way things work and perfects the state of harmony, culminating in what's known as suchness. The premise here is that harmony is a refinement of happiness, and suchness is perfectly refined harmony.



                The particular techniques used to generate happiness vary between schools. In early Buddhism, the main technique was to review one's own ethical purity, one's philosophical realizations (insights), and one's peaceful lifestyle, comparing that with regular people, and by congratulating oneself on actually measuring up very well, generate the sought state of euphoria.



                In conservative descendants (Theravada) this technique was mainly lost, and instead they now practice brute-force one-pointed concentration, which eventually leads to a similar state.



                In Tibetan schools, the technique shifts from recalling ones actual achievements, to substituting one's self-image with that of a deity. This is thought to have a better effect, since the imaginary self has no limits to its perfect qualities and can be optimized to counteract particular student's emotional hangups. Naturally, this goes at the expense of no longer having one's ethical achievements be the necessary basis of meditation, which Tibetan schools compensate by greatly emphasizing compassion.



                The second phase of jhanas is perfection of harmony. This is when the student realizes that the contrived state of happiness cannot be perfectly sustainable and instead learns to accept the natural uncontrived moment by moment state as the basis for the absence of inner conflict. This deepest acceptance of whatever arises at every moment, inwardly and outwardly, is known as suchness and is the summum bonum of Buddhist path.



                Again, the exact technique underwent mutation in historical schools. In Theravada they say that upon contemplating Three Marks of Existence seeing impermanence of all contrived states and inevitably of occasional suffering, the student must go through catharsis of accepting the existential failure, and emerge having completely lost all grasping to any experience.



                In most of the meditating Mahayana (such as various types of Chan/Zen), a state of non-judgmental awareness (don't accept, don't reject, just watch) is practiced as a straightforward way of cultivating suchness (following the beginner's breath meditation, therefore skipping the generation phase), but it's place in the big scheme of things is not usually explained, other than mysteriously stating that this is the very state of the Buddha.



                Finally, in Tibetan schools, this phase is practiced in conjunction with study of emptiness. For philosophically inclined students, analytical meditation on emptiness serves to dispell doubts that any contrived state cannot be It. What follows from that is staying in a wordless realization of this profound groundlessness, which serves as an entry into suchness. For students of less intellectual bent, the practice takes form of so called meditation of no-meditation, which is a name given to cultivation of appreciation of suchness as the primordially natural state.



                In any case, the path usually starts with removal of coarse obstacles, following by cultivation of the seemingly perfectly conflictless state, followed by realization that any contrived state is inherently unsustainable and conflict-driven, followed by contemplation of the implications of this realization, followed by direct cultivation of suchness and complete liberation. The Jhanas symbolically refer to the non-preliminary stages of this sequence.



                I think this covers most of what you asked, let me know if you have further questions.






                share|improve this answer






















                • I was following this post until the following: "In early Buddhism, the main technique was to review one's own ethical purity, one's philosophical realizations (insights), and one's peaceful lifestyle, comparing that with regular people, and by congratulating oneself on actually measuring up very well, generate the sought state of euphoria." I think it needs substantiation. It makes it sound like "jhana" is a euphoria produced by egoism and thinking.
                  – Dhammadhatu
                  44 mins ago











                Your Answer







                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "565"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                convertImagesToLinks: false,
                noModals: false,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: null,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );













                 

                draft saved


                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29256%2fbuddhist-jhanas-how-best-to-describe-them%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest






























                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes








                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes








                up vote
                3
                down vote














                In addition to primary sources that discuss what this phenomena is, how would you describe what the Jhanas are to a person unfamiliar with any sort of meditation practice?




                Jhanas are the practice to pause the present unwholesome mind. While jhāna mind are arising, there are no any unwholesome mind can arise, whole hours or whole day. Jhāna is basis of insight meditation.




                How do they differ across different sects/schools?




                They are same in meditation. It just difference in a few detail.




                How are they viewed sociologically or philosophically from OUTSIDE the lens of a practitioner or one who believes in the concept of enlightenment to begin with?




                The jhāna practitioner looks very judicious, worshipful.




                TL; DR seeking primary source information on Jhanas/Dhyanas. What is their history? How do they differ across schools/sects? How would an outsider or an academic understand them?




                • Path of Purification https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/nanamoli/PathofPurification2011.pdf

                • Path of Freedom
                  http://urbandharma.org/pdf1/Path_of_Freedom_Vimuttimagga.pdf

                • Pa-Auk tawya Monastery
                  http://122.155.190.19/revata/index.php?option=com_sectionex&view=category&id=6&Itemid=108#catid8





                share|improve this answer


























                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote














                  In addition to primary sources that discuss what this phenomena is, how would you describe what the Jhanas are to a person unfamiliar with any sort of meditation practice?




                  Jhanas are the practice to pause the present unwholesome mind. While jhāna mind are arising, there are no any unwholesome mind can arise, whole hours or whole day. Jhāna is basis of insight meditation.




                  How do they differ across different sects/schools?




                  They are same in meditation. It just difference in a few detail.




                  How are they viewed sociologically or philosophically from OUTSIDE the lens of a practitioner or one who believes in the concept of enlightenment to begin with?




                  The jhāna practitioner looks very judicious, worshipful.




                  TL; DR seeking primary source information on Jhanas/Dhyanas. What is their history? How do they differ across schools/sects? How would an outsider or an academic understand them?




                  • Path of Purification https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/nanamoli/PathofPurification2011.pdf

                  • Path of Freedom
                    http://urbandharma.org/pdf1/Path_of_Freedom_Vimuttimagga.pdf

                  • Pa-Auk tawya Monastery
                    http://122.155.190.19/revata/index.php?option=com_sectionex&view=category&id=6&Itemid=108#catid8





                  share|improve this answer
























                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote










                    In addition to primary sources that discuss what this phenomena is, how would you describe what the Jhanas are to a person unfamiliar with any sort of meditation practice?




                    Jhanas are the practice to pause the present unwholesome mind. While jhāna mind are arising, there are no any unwholesome mind can arise, whole hours or whole day. Jhāna is basis of insight meditation.




                    How do they differ across different sects/schools?




                    They are same in meditation. It just difference in a few detail.




                    How are they viewed sociologically or philosophically from OUTSIDE the lens of a practitioner or one who believes in the concept of enlightenment to begin with?




                    The jhāna practitioner looks very judicious, worshipful.




                    TL; DR seeking primary source information on Jhanas/Dhyanas. What is their history? How do they differ across schools/sects? How would an outsider or an academic understand them?




                    • Path of Purification https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/nanamoli/PathofPurification2011.pdf

                    • Path of Freedom
                      http://urbandharma.org/pdf1/Path_of_Freedom_Vimuttimagga.pdf

                    • Pa-Auk tawya Monastery
                      http://122.155.190.19/revata/index.php?option=com_sectionex&view=category&id=6&Itemid=108#catid8





                    share|improve this answer















                    In addition to primary sources that discuss what this phenomena is, how would you describe what the Jhanas are to a person unfamiliar with any sort of meditation practice?




                    Jhanas are the practice to pause the present unwholesome mind. While jhāna mind are arising, there are no any unwholesome mind can arise, whole hours or whole day. Jhāna is basis of insight meditation.




                    How do they differ across different sects/schools?




                    They are same in meditation. It just difference in a few detail.




                    How are they viewed sociologically or philosophically from OUTSIDE the lens of a practitioner or one who believes in the concept of enlightenment to begin with?




                    The jhāna practitioner looks very judicious, worshipful.




                    TL; DR seeking primary source information on Jhanas/Dhyanas. What is their history? How do they differ across schools/sects? How would an outsider or an academic understand them?




                    • Path of Purification https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/nanamoli/PathofPurification2011.pdf

                    • Path of Freedom
                      http://urbandharma.org/pdf1/Path_of_Freedom_Vimuttimagga.pdf

                    • Pa-Auk tawya Monastery
                      http://122.155.190.19/revata/index.php?option=com_sectionex&view=category&id=6&Itemid=108#catid8






                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 1 hour ago

























                    answered 6 hours ago









                    Bonn

                    2,8591214




                    2,8591214




















                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote














                        In addition to primary sources that discuss what this phenomena is, how would you describe what the Jhanas are to a person unfamiliar with
                        any sort of meditation practice?




                        The obvious primary source is the Pali suttas, which have the following standard formula found in many suttas:




                        Unflagging persistence was aroused in me, and unmuddled mindfulness established. My body was calm & unaroused, my mind concentrated &
                        single. Quite withdrawn from sensuality, withdrawn from unskillful
                        mental qualities, I entered & remained in the first jhana: rapture &
                        pleasure born from withdrawal, accompanied by directed thought &
                        evaluation. With the stilling of directed thoughts & evaluations, I
                        entered & remained in the second jhana: rapture & pleasure born of
                        composure, unification of awareness free from directed thought &
                        evaluation — internal assurance. With the fading of rapture I remained
                        in equanimity, mindful & alert, and physically sensitive of pleasure.
                        I entered & remained in the third jhana, of which the noble ones
                        declare, 'Equanimous & mindful, he has a pleasant abiding.' With the
                        abandoning of pleasure & pain — as with the earlier disappearance of
                        elation & distress — I entered & remained in the fourth jhana: purity
                        of equanimity & mindfulness, neither pleasure nor pain.



                        MN 4




                        The 1st reference to the experience of jhana is found in MN 36, where the Buddha recollected how as a child his mind spontaneously entered jhana under the rose apple tree:




                        I thought: 'I recall once, when my father the Sakyan was working, and I was sitting in the cool shade of a rose-apple tree, then — quite
                        secluded from sensuality, secluded from unskillful mental qualities —
                        I entered & remained in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born from
                        seclusion, accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. Could that be
                        the path to Awakening?' Then following on that memory came the
                        realization: 'That is the path to Awakening.' I thought: 'So why am I
                        afraid of that pleasure that has nothing to do with sensuality,
                        nothing to do with unskillful mental qualities?' I thought: 'I am no
                        longer afraid of that pleasure that has nothing to do with sensuality,
                        nothing to do with unskillful mental qualities, but that pleasure is
                        not easy to achieve with a body so extremely emaciated. Suppose I were
                        to take some solid food: some rice & porridge.' So I took some solid
                        food: some rice & porridge. Now five monks had been attending on me,
                        thinking, 'If Gotama, our contemplative, achieves some higher state,
                        he will tell us.' But when they saw me taking some solid food — some
                        rice & porridge — they were disgusted and left me, thinking, 'Gotama
                        the contemplative is living luxuriously. He has abandoned his exertion
                        and is backsliding into abundance.'



                        MN 36






                        How do they differ across different sects/schools?




                        The jhana of the Buddha is called "noble" "("ariya") "supramundane" ("lokuttara"), per MN 117, because it is developed by using "letting go" ("vossagga") of craving and ego the meditation object, as described in SN 48.10:




                        And what is the faculty of concentration? There is the case where a monk, a disciple of the noble ones, making it his object to let go (vossagga),
                        attains concentration, attains singleness of mind. Quite withdrawn
                        from sensuality, withdrawn from unskillful mental qualities, he enters
                        & remains in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born from withdrawal,
                        accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. With the stilling of
                        directed thoughts & evaluations, he enters & remains in the second
                        jhana: rapture & pleasure born of composure, unification of awareness
                        free from directed thought & evaluation — internal assurance. With the
                        fading of rapture, he remains equanimous, mindful, & alert, and senses
                        pleasure with the body. He enters & remains in the third jhana, of
                        which the Noble Ones declare, 'Equanimous & mindful, he has a pleasant
                        abiding.' With the abandoning of pleasure & pain — as with the earlier
                        disappearance of elation & distress — he enters & remains in the
                        fourth jhana: purity of equanimity & mindfulness, neither pleasure nor
                        pain. This is called the faculty of concentration.



                        SN 48.10




                        The above quality of "letting go" is what distinguishes the jhana of the Buddha from other sects, including so-called Buddhist sects, which refer to false ideas such as "suppression" and use "yogic" ("Hindu") techniques such as counting, fixing and mental application (fueled by craving). Some of the false heretical jhana sects are listed below:



                        • Path of Purification https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/nanamoli/PathofPurification2011.pdf


                        • Path of Freedom
                          http://urbandharma.org/pdf1/Path_of_Freedom_Vimuttimagga.pdf


                        • Pa-Auk tawya Monastery
                          http://122.155.190.19/revata/index.php?option=com_sectionex&view=category&id=6&Itemid=108#catid8



                        How are they viewed sociologically or philosophically from OUTSIDE the lens of a practitioner or one who believes in the concept of
                        enlightenment to begin with?




                        Like most religions, OUTSIDERS view jhana in very superstitious (magical) & egoistic ways. The internet is replete with particularly Westerners who claim they (as a self or ego) have experienced jhana when they have not.




                        TL; DR seeking primary source information on Jhanas/Dhyanas. What is their history? How do they differ across schools/sects? How would an
                        outsider or an academic understand them?




                        Academics can read books of other academics, such as A History of Mindfulness by Bhikkhu Sujato. I recommend to start with this book. Simply type "jhana" into the find function. For example:




                        This psychology also emerges in the usage of the word dhī, familiar as the root of the Buddhist term ‘jhāna’. Dhī is used early on in the
                        sense of ‘thought’, and has a special connection with the ‘visioning’
                        of the Vedic poetry: dhī is the intuitive awareness as the poet/priest
                        ‘sees’ the verses. This ‘thought’ (dhī) or ‘mind’ (manas) is
                        disciplined (yoga) by the reciters. ‘The priests of him the divine
                        Savitr well-skilled in hymns Harness their mind, yea, harness their
                        holy thoughts.’



                        But jhāna did not develop its meaning of ‘deep absorption’ until the
                        Buddha. In the Bṛhadāraṇyaka, jhāna is contrasted with the stillness
                        of the True Self.



                        ‘Which is the Self? ‘That person here made of cognition among the senses [breaths], the light within the heart. He, remaining the same,
                        wanders about the two worlds as if thinking (dhyāyati), as if playing
                        (lelāyati).’



                        The Upaniṣads constantly remind us to preserve the correct mental attitude; to perform the rituals with one’s whole being, contemplating
                        the significance of each aspect as one carriesit out. Even the earlier
                        Brahmanas allow that if a ritual cannot be carried out physically it
                        may be performed by ‘faith’, i.e. as a purely mental act. In this
                        immersion of awareness in one’s actions we can discern a precursor to
                        the Buddhist emphasis on mindfulness through all one’s activities.



                        It is a curious thing that when we look at the sources most likely to be contemporary with the Buddha​—​namely the Bṛhadāraṇyaka and the
                        Chāndogya​—​we find that these well-known meditative terms are used
                        less frequently, and a word apparently foreign to Buddhist meditation
                        is found far more often. This word is upāsana. Edward Crangle,
                        following Velkar, has studied this term in detail, and lists the
                        frequency of occurrence. In the Bṛhadāraṇyaka, upāsana occurs 63
                        times, jhāna thrice, and yoga twice. In the Chāndogya, upāsana occurs
                        115 times, jhāna twelve times, and yoga again twice.







                        share|improve this answer


























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote














                          In addition to primary sources that discuss what this phenomena is, how would you describe what the Jhanas are to a person unfamiliar with
                          any sort of meditation practice?




                          The obvious primary source is the Pali suttas, which have the following standard formula found in many suttas:




                          Unflagging persistence was aroused in me, and unmuddled mindfulness established. My body was calm & unaroused, my mind concentrated &
                          single. Quite withdrawn from sensuality, withdrawn from unskillful
                          mental qualities, I entered & remained in the first jhana: rapture &
                          pleasure born from withdrawal, accompanied by directed thought &
                          evaluation. With the stilling of directed thoughts & evaluations, I
                          entered & remained in the second jhana: rapture & pleasure born of
                          composure, unification of awareness free from directed thought &
                          evaluation — internal assurance. With the fading of rapture I remained
                          in equanimity, mindful & alert, and physically sensitive of pleasure.
                          I entered & remained in the third jhana, of which the noble ones
                          declare, 'Equanimous & mindful, he has a pleasant abiding.' With the
                          abandoning of pleasure & pain — as with the earlier disappearance of
                          elation & distress — I entered & remained in the fourth jhana: purity
                          of equanimity & mindfulness, neither pleasure nor pain.



                          MN 4




                          The 1st reference to the experience of jhana is found in MN 36, where the Buddha recollected how as a child his mind spontaneously entered jhana under the rose apple tree:




                          I thought: 'I recall once, when my father the Sakyan was working, and I was sitting in the cool shade of a rose-apple tree, then — quite
                          secluded from sensuality, secluded from unskillful mental qualities —
                          I entered & remained in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born from
                          seclusion, accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. Could that be
                          the path to Awakening?' Then following on that memory came the
                          realization: 'That is the path to Awakening.' I thought: 'So why am I
                          afraid of that pleasure that has nothing to do with sensuality,
                          nothing to do with unskillful mental qualities?' I thought: 'I am no
                          longer afraid of that pleasure that has nothing to do with sensuality,
                          nothing to do with unskillful mental qualities, but that pleasure is
                          not easy to achieve with a body so extremely emaciated. Suppose I were
                          to take some solid food: some rice & porridge.' So I took some solid
                          food: some rice & porridge. Now five monks had been attending on me,
                          thinking, 'If Gotama, our contemplative, achieves some higher state,
                          he will tell us.' But when they saw me taking some solid food — some
                          rice & porridge — they were disgusted and left me, thinking, 'Gotama
                          the contemplative is living luxuriously. He has abandoned his exertion
                          and is backsliding into abundance.'



                          MN 36






                          How do they differ across different sects/schools?




                          The jhana of the Buddha is called "noble" "("ariya") "supramundane" ("lokuttara"), per MN 117, because it is developed by using "letting go" ("vossagga") of craving and ego the meditation object, as described in SN 48.10:




                          And what is the faculty of concentration? There is the case where a monk, a disciple of the noble ones, making it his object to let go (vossagga),
                          attains concentration, attains singleness of mind. Quite withdrawn
                          from sensuality, withdrawn from unskillful mental qualities, he enters
                          & remains in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born from withdrawal,
                          accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. With the stilling of
                          directed thoughts & evaluations, he enters & remains in the second
                          jhana: rapture & pleasure born of composure, unification of awareness
                          free from directed thought & evaluation — internal assurance. With the
                          fading of rapture, he remains equanimous, mindful, & alert, and senses
                          pleasure with the body. He enters & remains in the third jhana, of
                          which the Noble Ones declare, 'Equanimous & mindful, he has a pleasant
                          abiding.' With the abandoning of pleasure & pain — as with the earlier
                          disappearance of elation & distress — he enters & remains in the
                          fourth jhana: purity of equanimity & mindfulness, neither pleasure nor
                          pain. This is called the faculty of concentration.



                          SN 48.10




                          The above quality of "letting go" is what distinguishes the jhana of the Buddha from other sects, including so-called Buddhist sects, which refer to false ideas such as "suppression" and use "yogic" ("Hindu") techniques such as counting, fixing and mental application (fueled by craving). Some of the false heretical jhana sects are listed below:



                          • Path of Purification https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/nanamoli/PathofPurification2011.pdf


                          • Path of Freedom
                            http://urbandharma.org/pdf1/Path_of_Freedom_Vimuttimagga.pdf


                          • Pa-Auk tawya Monastery
                            http://122.155.190.19/revata/index.php?option=com_sectionex&view=category&id=6&Itemid=108#catid8



                          How are they viewed sociologically or philosophically from OUTSIDE the lens of a practitioner or one who believes in the concept of
                          enlightenment to begin with?




                          Like most religions, OUTSIDERS view jhana in very superstitious (magical) & egoistic ways. The internet is replete with particularly Westerners who claim they (as a self or ego) have experienced jhana when they have not.




                          TL; DR seeking primary source information on Jhanas/Dhyanas. What is their history? How do they differ across schools/sects? How would an
                          outsider or an academic understand them?




                          Academics can read books of other academics, such as A History of Mindfulness by Bhikkhu Sujato. I recommend to start with this book. Simply type "jhana" into the find function. For example:




                          This psychology also emerges in the usage of the word dhī, familiar as the root of the Buddhist term ‘jhāna’. Dhī is used early on in the
                          sense of ‘thought’, and has a special connection with the ‘visioning’
                          of the Vedic poetry: dhī is the intuitive awareness as the poet/priest
                          ‘sees’ the verses. This ‘thought’ (dhī) or ‘mind’ (manas) is
                          disciplined (yoga) by the reciters. ‘The priests of him the divine
                          Savitr well-skilled in hymns Harness their mind, yea, harness their
                          holy thoughts.’



                          But jhāna did not develop its meaning of ‘deep absorption’ until the
                          Buddha. In the Bṛhadāraṇyaka, jhāna is contrasted with the stillness
                          of the True Self.



                          ‘Which is the Self? ‘That person here made of cognition among the senses [breaths], the light within the heart. He, remaining the same,
                          wanders about the two worlds as if thinking (dhyāyati), as if playing
                          (lelāyati).’



                          The Upaniṣads constantly remind us to preserve the correct mental attitude; to perform the rituals with one’s whole being, contemplating
                          the significance of each aspect as one carriesit out. Even the earlier
                          Brahmanas allow that if a ritual cannot be carried out physically it
                          may be performed by ‘faith’, i.e. as a purely mental act. In this
                          immersion of awareness in one’s actions we can discern a precursor to
                          the Buddhist emphasis on mindfulness through all one’s activities.



                          It is a curious thing that when we look at the sources most likely to be contemporary with the Buddha​—​namely the Bṛhadāraṇyaka and the
                          Chāndogya​—​we find that these well-known meditative terms are used
                          less frequently, and a word apparently foreign to Buddhist meditation
                          is found far more often. This word is upāsana. Edward Crangle,
                          following Velkar, has studied this term in detail, and lists the
                          frequency of occurrence. In the Bṛhadāraṇyaka, upāsana occurs 63
                          times, jhāna thrice, and yoga twice. In the Chāndogya, upāsana occurs
                          115 times, jhāna twelve times, and yoga again twice.







                          share|improve this answer
























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote










                            In addition to primary sources that discuss what this phenomena is, how would you describe what the Jhanas are to a person unfamiliar with
                            any sort of meditation practice?




                            The obvious primary source is the Pali suttas, which have the following standard formula found in many suttas:




                            Unflagging persistence was aroused in me, and unmuddled mindfulness established. My body was calm & unaroused, my mind concentrated &
                            single. Quite withdrawn from sensuality, withdrawn from unskillful
                            mental qualities, I entered & remained in the first jhana: rapture &
                            pleasure born from withdrawal, accompanied by directed thought &
                            evaluation. With the stilling of directed thoughts & evaluations, I
                            entered & remained in the second jhana: rapture & pleasure born of
                            composure, unification of awareness free from directed thought &
                            evaluation — internal assurance. With the fading of rapture I remained
                            in equanimity, mindful & alert, and physically sensitive of pleasure.
                            I entered & remained in the third jhana, of which the noble ones
                            declare, 'Equanimous & mindful, he has a pleasant abiding.' With the
                            abandoning of pleasure & pain — as with the earlier disappearance of
                            elation & distress — I entered & remained in the fourth jhana: purity
                            of equanimity & mindfulness, neither pleasure nor pain.



                            MN 4




                            The 1st reference to the experience of jhana is found in MN 36, where the Buddha recollected how as a child his mind spontaneously entered jhana under the rose apple tree:




                            I thought: 'I recall once, when my father the Sakyan was working, and I was sitting in the cool shade of a rose-apple tree, then — quite
                            secluded from sensuality, secluded from unskillful mental qualities —
                            I entered & remained in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born from
                            seclusion, accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. Could that be
                            the path to Awakening?' Then following on that memory came the
                            realization: 'That is the path to Awakening.' I thought: 'So why am I
                            afraid of that pleasure that has nothing to do with sensuality,
                            nothing to do with unskillful mental qualities?' I thought: 'I am no
                            longer afraid of that pleasure that has nothing to do with sensuality,
                            nothing to do with unskillful mental qualities, but that pleasure is
                            not easy to achieve with a body so extremely emaciated. Suppose I were
                            to take some solid food: some rice & porridge.' So I took some solid
                            food: some rice & porridge. Now five monks had been attending on me,
                            thinking, 'If Gotama, our contemplative, achieves some higher state,
                            he will tell us.' But when they saw me taking some solid food — some
                            rice & porridge — they were disgusted and left me, thinking, 'Gotama
                            the contemplative is living luxuriously. He has abandoned his exertion
                            and is backsliding into abundance.'



                            MN 36






                            How do they differ across different sects/schools?




                            The jhana of the Buddha is called "noble" "("ariya") "supramundane" ("lokuttara"), per MN 117, because it is developed by using "letting go" ("vossagga") of craving and ego the meditation object, as described in SN 48.10:




                            And what is the faculty of concentration? There is the case where a monk, a disciple of the noble ones, making it his object to let go (vossagga),
                            attains concentration, attains singleness of mind. Quite withdrawn
                            from sensuality, withdrawn from unskillful mental qualities, he enters
                            & remains in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born from withdrawal,
                            accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. With the stilling of
                            directed thoughts & evaluations, he enters & remains in the second
                            jhana: rapture & pleasure born of composure, unification of awareness
                            free from directed thought & evaluation — internal assurance. With the
                            fading of rapture, he remains equanimous, mindful, & alert, and senses
                            pleasure with the body. He enters & remains in the third jhana, of
                            which the Noble Ones declare, 'Equanimous & mindful, he has a pleasant
                            abiding.' With the abandoning of pleasure & pain — as with the earlier
                            disappearance of elation & distress — he enters & remains in the
                            fourth jhana: purity of equanimity & mindfulness, neither pleasure nor
                            pain. This is called the faculty of concentration.



                            SN 48.10




                            The above quality of "letting go" is what distinguishes the jhana of the Buddha from other sects, including so-called Buddhist sects, which refer to false ideas such as "suppression" and use "yogic" ("Hindu") techniques such as counting, fixing and mental application (fueled by craving). Some of the false heretical jhana sects are listed below:



                            • Path of Purification https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/nanamoli/PathofPurification2011.pdf


                            • Path of Freedom
                              http://urbandharma.org/pdf1/Path_of_Freedom_Vimuttimagga.pdf


                            • Pa-Auk tawya Monastery
                              http://122.155.190.19/revata/index.php?option=com_sectionex&view=category&id=6&Itemid=108#catid8



                            How are they viewed sociologically or philosophically from OUTSIDE the lens of a practitioner or one who believes in the concept of
                            enlightenment to begin with?




                            Like most religions, OUTSIDERS view jhana in very superstitious (magical) & egoistic ways. The internet is replete with particularly Westerners who claim they (as a self or ego) have experienced jhana when they have not.




                            TL; DR seeking primary source information on Jhanas/Dhyanas. What is their history? How do they differ across schools/sects? How would an
                            outsider or an academic understand them?




                            Academics can read books of other academics, such as A History of Mindfulness by Bhikkhu Sujato. I recommend to start with this book. Simply type "jhana" into the find function. For example:




                            This psychology also emerges in the usage of the word dhī, familiar as the root of the Buddhist term ‘jhāna’. Dhī is used early on in the
                            sense of ‘thought’, and has a special connection with the ‘visioning’
                            of the Vedic poetry: dhī is the intuitive awareness as the poet/priest
                            ‘sees’ the verses. This ‘thought’ (dhī) or ‘mind’ (manas) is
                            disciplined (yoga) by the reciters. ‘The priests of him the divine
                            Savitr well-skilled in hymns Harness their mind, yea, harness their
                            holy thoughts.’



                            But jhāna did not develop its meaning of ‘deep absorption’ until the
                            Buddha. In the Bṛhadāraṇyaka, jhāna is contrasted with the stillness
                            of the True Self.



                            ‘Which is the Self? ‘That person here made of cognition among the senses [breaths], the light within the heart. He, remaining the same,
                            wanders about the two worlds as if thinking (dhyāyati), as if playing
                            (lelāyati).’



                            The Upaniṣads constantly remind us to preserve the correct mental attitude; to perform the rituals with one’s whole being, contemplating
                            the significance of each aspect as one carriesit out. Even the earlier
                            Brahmanas allow that if a ritual cannot be carried out physically it
                            may be performed by ‘faith’, i.e. as a purely mental act. In this
                            immersion of awareness in one’s actions we can discern a precursor to
                            the Buddhist emphasis on mindfulness through all one’s activities.



                            It is a curious thing that when we look at the sources most likely to be contemporary with the Buddha​—​namely the Bṛhadāraṇyaka and the
                            Chāndogya​—​we find that these well-known meditative terms are used
                            less frequently, and a word apparently foreign to Buddhist meditation
                            is found far more often. This word is upāsana. Edward Crangle,
                            following Velkar, has studied this term in detail, and lists the
                            frequency of occurrence. In the Bṛhadāraṇyaka, upāsana occurs 63
                            times, jhāna thrice, and yoga twice. In the Chāndogya, upāsana occurs
                            115 times, jhāna twelve times, and yoga again twice.







                            share|improve this answer















                            In addition to primary sources that discuss what this phenomena is, how would you describe what the Jhanas are to a person unfamiliar with
                            any sort of meditation practice?




                            The obvious primary source is the Pali suttas, which have the following standard formula found in many suttas:




                            Unflagging persistence was aroused in me, and unmuddled mindfulness established. My body was calm & unaroused, my mind concentrated &
                            single. Quite withdrawn from sensuality, withdrawn from unskillful
                            mental qualities, I entered & remained in the first jhana: rapture &
                            pleasure born from withdrawal, accompanied by directed thought &
                            evaluation. With the stilling of directed thoughts & evaluations, I
                            entered & remained in the second jhana: rapture & pleasure born of
                            composure, unification of awareness free from directed thought &
                            evaluation — internal assurance. With the fading of rapture I remained
                            in equanimity, mindful & alert, and physically sensitive of pleasure.
                            I entered & remained in the third jhana, of which the noble ones
                            declare, 'Equanimous & mindful, he has a pleasant abiding.' With the
                            abandoning of pleasure & pain — as with the earlier disappearance of
                            elation & distress — I entered & remained in the fourth jhana: purity
                            of equanimity & mindfulness, neither pleasure nor pain.



                            MN 4




                            The 1st reference to the experience of jhana is found in MN 36, where the Buddha recollected how as a child his mind spontaneously entered jhana under the rose apple tree:




                            I thought: 'I recall once, when my father the Sakyan was working, and I was sitting in the cool shade of a rose-apple tree, then — quite
                            secluded from sensuality, secluded from unskillful mental qualities —
                            I entered & remained in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born from
                            seclusion, accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. Could that be
                            the path to Awakening?' Then following on that memory came the
                            realization: 'That is the path to Awakening.' I thought: 'So why am I
                            afraid of that pleasure that has nothing to do with sensuality,
                            nothing to do with unskillful mental qualities?' I thought: 'I am no
                            longer afraid of that pleasure that has nothing to do with sensuality,
                            nothing to do with unskillful mental qualities, but that pleasure is
                            not easy to achieve with a body so extremely emaciated. Suppose I were
                            to take some solid food: some rice & porridge.' So I took some solid
                            food: some rice & porridge. Now five monks had been attending on me,
                            thinking, 'If Gotama, our contemplative, achieves some higher state,
                            he will tell us.' But when they saw me taking some solid food — some
                            rice & porridge — they were disgusted and left me, thinking, 'Gotama
                            the contemplative is living luxuriously. He has abandoned his exertion
                            and is backsliding into abundance.'



                            MN 36






                            How do they differ across different sects/schools?




                            The jhana of the Buddha is called "noble" "("ariya") "supramundane" ("lokuttara"), per MN 117, because it is developed by using "letting go" ("vossagga") of craving and ego the meditation object, as described in SN 48.10:




                            And what is the faculty of concentration? There is the case where a monk, a disciple of the noble ones, making it his object to let go (vossagga),
                            attains concentration, attains singleness of mind. Quite withdrawn
                            from sensuality, withdrawn from unskillful mental qualities, he enters
                            & remains in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born from withdrawal,
                            accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. With the stilling of
                            directed thoughts & evaluations, he enters & remains in the second
                            jhana: rapture & pleasure born of composure, unification of awareness
                            free from directed thought & evaluation — internal assurance. With the
                            fading of rapture, he remains equanimous, mindful, & alert, and senses
                            pleasure with the body. He enters & remains in the third jhana, of
                            which the Noble Ones declare, 'Equanimous & mindful, he has a pleasant
                            abiding.' With the abandoning of pleasure & pain — as with the earlier
                            disappearance of elation & distress — he enters & remains in the
                            fourth jhana: purity of equanimity & mindfulness, neither pleasure nor
                            pain. This is called the faculty of concentration.



                            SN 48.10




                            The above quality of "letting go" is what distinguishes the jhana of the Buddha from other sects, including so-called Buddhist sects, which refer to false ideas such as "suppression" and use "yogic" ("Hindu") techniques such as counting, fixing and mental application (fueled by craving). Some of the false heretical jhana sects are listed below:



                            • Path of Purification https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/nanamoli/PathofPurification2011.pdf


                            • Path of Freedom
                              http://urbandharma.org/pdf1/Path_of_Freedom_Vimuttimagga.pdf


                            • Pa-Auk tawya Monastery
                              http://122.155.190.19/revata/index.php?option=com_sectionex&view=category&id=6&Itemid=108#catid8



                            How are they viewed sociologically or philosophically from OUTSIDE the lens of a practitioner or one who believes in the concept of
                            enlightenment to begin with?




                            Like most religions, OUTSIDERS view jhana in very superstitious (magical) & egoistic ways. The internet is replete with particularly Westerners who claim they (as a self or ego) have experienced jhana when they have not.




                            TL; DR seeking primary source information on Jhanas/Dhyanas. What is their history? How do they differ across schools/sects? How would an
                            outsider or an academic understand them?




                            Academics can read books of other academics, such as A History of Mindfulness by Bhikkhu Sujato. I recommend to start with this book. Simply type "jhana" into the find function. For example:




                            This psychology also emerges in the usage of the word dhī, familiar as the root of the Buddhist term ‘jhāna’. Dhī is used early on in the
                            sense of ‘thought’, and has a special connection with the ‘visioning’
                            of the Vedic poetry: dhī is the intuitive awareness as the poet/priest
                            ‘sees’ the verses. This ‘thought’ (dhī) or ‘mind’ (manas) is
                            disciplined (yoga) by the reciters. ‘The priests of him the divine
                            Savitr well-skilled in hymns Harness their mind, yea, harness their
                            holy thoughts.’



                            But jhāna did not develop its meaning of ‘deep absorption’ until the
                            Buddha. In the Bṛhadāraṇyaka, jhāna is contrasted with the stillness
                            of the True Self.



                            ‘Which is the Self? ‘That person here made of cognition among the senses [breaths], the light within the heart. He, remaining the same,
                            wanders about the two worlds as if thinking (dhyāyati), as if playing
                            (lelāyati).’



                            The Upaniṣads constantly remind us to preserve the correct mental attitude; to perform the rituals with one’s whole being, contemplating
                            the significance of each aspect as one carriesit out. Even the earlier
                            Brahmanas allow that if a ritual cannot be carried out physically it
                            may be performed by ‘faith’, i.e. as a purely mental act. In this
                            immersion of awareness in one’s actions we can discern a precursor to
                            the Buddhist emphasis on mindfulness through all one’s activities.



                            It is a curious thing that when we look at the sources most likely to be contemporary with the Buddha​—​namely the Bṛhadāraṇyaka and the
                            Chāndogya​—​we find that these well-known meditative terms are used
                            less frequently, and a word apparently foreign to Buddhist meditation
                            is found far more often. This word is upāsana. Edward Crangle,
                            following Velkar, has studied this term in detail, and lists the
                            frequency of occurrence. In the Bṛhadāraṇyaka, upāsana occurs 63
                            times, jhāna thrice, and yoga twice. In the Chāndogya, upāsana occurs
                            115 times, jhāna twelve times, and yoga again twice.








                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited 40 mins ago

























                            answered 4 hours ago









                            Dhammadhatu

                            23.2k11042




                            23.2k11042




















                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote













                                Words don't really do jhanic experiences any justice. In the grand scheme of things, words are like tiny particles of sediment in the vast ocean of a jhanic experience. This is further compounded by the experience of formless jhanas.



                                Yes, they can be described and quite creatively too. My first wakeful jhana happened last year. It spanned a period of 5 hours and it changed my whole lifestyle. They can be life changing, powerful and perhaps mystical but jhanas come and go and so not worth attaching oneself to them. No sect or school can claim any exclusivity over these wakeful states.



                                Below is a description which was written last year after the event.




                                The temporary awakening was devoid of any kind of grand entrance. I was out with my 7 year old who was playing. It seemed to happen whilst I was looking at the foliage in the park. The plantation took on a whole new aliveness and vibrancy. This was when I sensed an undertone that something had shifted in my consciousness. My thoughts no longer existed. Instead, they were replaced by a deep intuitive 'knowing' about the things I observed in my environment. Nothing seemed to matter because everything had a relationship through a very odd unification. When I looked at people a knowing arose in me of their discontent but at the very same time I could recognise their immense potential. From the fusion of those two seeming poles grew a deep and warm compassion for human beings. Quite a beautiful way to view people!



                                The experience completely shredded my mental concepts of who I thought I had been and the structure of the world around me seems drastically different henceforth. Smaller jhanas occurred afterwards. I look at a tree stretching towards its ultimate creator - the mysterious darkness of the cosmos, the totality of consciousness itself - and it gently sways as if joyously waving at other passing lifeforms, inviting them to join in its moment of presence and symphonic rhythm of interconnectedness. Previously it was just a tree. I hardly gave them a second glance.







                                share|improve this answer
























                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote













                                  Words don't really do jhanic experiences any justice. In the grand scheme of things, words are like tiny particles of sediment in the vast ocean of a jhanic experience. This is further compounded by the experience of formless jhanas.



                                  Yes, they can be described and quite creatively too. My first wakeful jhana happened last year. It spanned a period of 5 hours and it changed my whole lifestyle. They can be life changing, powerful and perhaps mystical but jhanas come and go and so not worth attaching oneself to them. No sect or school can claim any exclusivity over these wakeful states.



                                  Below is a description which was written last year after the event.




                                  The temporary awakening was devoid of any kind of grand entrance. I was out with my 7 year old who was playing. It seemed to happen whilst I was looking at the foliage in the park. The plantation took on a whole new aliveness and vibrancy. This was when I sensed an undertone that something had shifted in my consciousness. My thoughts no longer existed. Instead, they were replaced by a deep intuitive 'knowing' about the things I observed in my environment. Nothing seemed to matter because everything had a relationship through a very odd unification. When I looked at people a knowing arose in me of their discontent but at the very same time I could recognise their immense potential. From the fusion of those two seeming poles grew a deep and warm compassion for human beings. Quite a beautiful way to view people!



                                  The experience completely shredded my mental concepts of who I thought I had been and the structure of the world around me seems drastically different henceforth. Smaller jhanas occurred afterwards. I look at a tree stretching towards its ultimate creator - the mysterious darkness of the cosmos, the totality of consciousness itself - and it gently sways as if joyously waving at other passing lifeforms, inviting them to join in its moment of presence and symphonic rhythm of interconnectedness. Previously it was just a tree. I hardly gave them a second glance.







                                  share|improve this answer






















                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote










                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote









                                    Words don't really do jhanic experiences any justice. In the grand scheme of things, words are like tiny particles of sediment in the vast ocean of a jhanic experience. This is further compounded by the experience of formless jhanas.



                                    Yes, they can be described and quite creatively too. My first wakeful jhana happened last year. It spanned a period of 5 hours and it changed my whole lifestyle. They can be life changing, powerful and perhaps mystical but jhanas come and go and so not worth attaching oneself to them. No sect or school can claim any exclusivity over these wakeful states.



                                    Below is a description which was written last year after the event.




                                    The temporary awakening was devoid of any kind of grand entrance. I was out with my 7 year old who was playing. It seemed to happen whilst I was looking at the foliage in the park. The plantation took on a whole new aliveness and vibrancy. This was when I sensed an undertone that something had shifted in my consciousness. My thoughts no longer existed. Instead, they were replaced by a deep intuitive 'knowing' about the things I observed in my environment. Nothing seemed to matter because everything had a relationship through a very odd unification. When I looked at people a knowing arose in me of their discontent but at the very same time I could recognise their immense potential. From the fusion of those two seeming poles grew a deep and warm compassion for human beings. Quite a beautiful way to view people!



                                    The experience completely shredded my mental concepts of who I thought I had been and the structure of the world around me seems drastically different henceforth. Smaller jhanas occurred afterwards. I look at a tree stretching towards its ultimate creator - the mysterious darkness of the cosmos, the totality of consciousness itself - and it gently sways as if joyously waving at other passing lifeforms, inviting them to join in its moment of presence and symphonic rhythm of interconnectedness. Previously it was just a tree. I hardly gave them a second glance.







                                    share|improve this answer












                                    Words don't really do jhanic experiences any justice. In the grand scheme of things, words are like tiny particles of sediment in the vast ocean of a jhanic experience. This is further compounded by the experience of formless jhanas.



                                    Yes, they can be described and quite creatively too. My first wakeful jhana happened last year. It spanned a period of 5 hours and it changed my whole lifestyle. They can be life changing, powerful and perhaps mystical but jhanas come and go and so not worth attaching oneself to them. No sect or school can claim any exclusivity over these wakeful states.



                                    Below is a description which was written last year after the event.




                                    The temporary awakening was devoid of any kind of grand entrance. I was out with my 7 year old who was playing. It seemed to happen whilst I was looking at the foliage in the park. The plantation took on a whole new aliveness and vibrancy. This was when I sensed an undertone that something had shifted in my consciousness. My thoughts no longer existed. Instead, they were replaced by a deep intuitive 'knowing' about the things I observed in my environment. Nothing seemed to matter because everything had a relationship through a very odd unification. When I looked at people a knowing arose in me of their discontent but at the very same time I could recognise their immense potential. From the fusion of those two seeming poles grew a deep and warm compassion for human beings. Quite a beautiful way to view people!



                                    The experience completely shredded my mental concepts of who I thought I had been and the structure of the world around me seems drastically different henceforth. Smaller jhanas occurred afterwards. I look at a tree stretching towards its ultimate creator - the mysterious darkness of the cosmos, the totality of consciousness itself - and it gently sways as if joyously waving at other passing lifeforms, inviting them to join in its moment of presence and symphonic rhythm of interconnectedness. Previously it was just a tree. I hardly gave them a second glance.








                                    share|improve this answer












                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer










                                    answered 7 hours ago









                                    Nuance

                                    796




                                    796




















                                        up vote
                                        -1
                                        down vote













                                        I would say that Jhanas are the final stages of the progressive development of the state of inner harmony, that is the Buddhist path.



                                        The entire Buddhist path is based on one principle, that psychological discomfort comes from inner conflict and that therefore eliminating inner conflict leads to inner harmony. Secondarily, outer conflict leads to inner conflict, and ethical behavior is defined as that which prevents outer conflict.



                                        The prerequisite to Jhanas, therefore, is to eliminate all coarse conflicts that serve as obstacles to the attainment of harmony, such as external entanglements and various real life sources of personal drama and regret. Hence the emphasis on ethics, non-attachment, and non-egoism for beginners.



                                        Once the life of an individual is more or less peaceful on a day to day basis, the student can focus solely on their mind and attain Complete Harmony. This is the role of Jhanas.



                                        Jhanas are generally divided into two stages. On the first stage, student uses emotional intelligence techniques to generate a state of happiness. On the second stage, the student contemplates the way things work and perfects the state of harmony, culminating in what's known as suchness. The premise here is that harmony is a refinement of happiness, and suchness is perfectly refined harmony.



                                        The particular techniques used to generate happiness vary between schools. In early Buddhism, the main technique was to review one's own ethical purity, one's philosophical realizations (insights), and one's peaceful lifestyle, comparing that with regular people, and by congratulating oneself on actually measuring up very well, generate the sought state of euphoria.



                                        In conservative descendants (Theravada) this technique was mainly lost, and instead they now practice brute-force one-pointed concentration, which eventually leads to a similar state.



                                        In Tibetan schools, the technique shifts from recalling ones actual achievements, to substituting one's self-image with that of a deity. This is thought to have a better effect, since the imaginary self has no limits to its perfect qualities and can be optimized to counteract particular student's emotional hangups. Naturally, this goes at the expense of no longer having one's ethical achievements be the necessary basis of meditation, which Tibetan schools compensate by greatly emphasizing compassion.



                                        The second phase of jhanas is perfection of harmony. This is when the student realizes that the contrived state of happiness cannot be perfectly sustainable and instead learns to accept the natural uncontrived moment by moment state as the basis for the absence of inner conflict. This deepest acceptance of whatever arises at every moment, inwardly and outwardly, is known as suchness and is the summum bonum of Buddhist path.



                                        Again, the exact technique underwent mutation in historical schools. In Theravada they say that upon contemplating Three Marks of Existence seeing impermanence of all contrived states and inevitably of occasional suffering, the student must go through catharsis of accepting the existential failure, and emerge having completely lost all grasping to any experience.



                                        In most of the meditating Mahayana (such as various types of Chan/Zen), a state of non-judgmental awareness (don't accept, don't reject, just watch) is practiced as a straightforward way of cultivating suchness (following the beginner's breath meditation, therefore skipping the generation phase), but it's place in the big scheme of things is not usually explained, other than mysteriously stating that this is the very state of the Buddha.



                                        Finally, in Tibetan schools, this phase is practiced in conjunction with study of emptiness. For philosophically inclined students, analytical meditation on emptiness serves to dispell doubts that any contrived state cannot be It. What follows from that is staying in a wordless realization of this profound groundlessness, which serves as an entry into suchness. For students of less intellectual bent, the practice takes form of so called meditation of no-meditation, which is a name given to cultivation of appreciation of suchness as the primordially natural state.



                                        In any case, the path usually starts with removal of coarse obstacles, following by cultivation of the seemingly perfectly conflictless state, followed by realization that any contrived state is inherently unsustainable and conflict-driven, followed by contemplation of the implications of this realization, followed by direct cultivation of suchness and complete liberation. The Jhanas symbolically refer to the non-preliminary stages of this sequence.



                                        I think this covers most of what you asked, let me know if you have further questions.






                                        share|improve this answer






















                                        • I was following this post until the following: "In early Buddhism, the main technique was to review one's own ethical purity, one's philosophical realizations (insights), and one's peaceful lifestyle, comparing that with regular people, and by congratulating oneself on actually measuring up very well, generate the sought state of euphoria." I think it needs substantiation. It makes it sound like "jhana" is a euphoria produced by egoism and thinking.
                                          – Dhammadhatu
                                          44 mins ago















                                        up vote
                                        -1
                                        down vote













                                        I would say that Jhanas are the final stages of the progressive development of the state of inner harmony, that is the Buddhist path.



                                        The entire Buddhist path is based on one principle, that psychological discomfort comes from inner conflict and that therefore eliminating inner conflict leads to inner harmony. Secondarily, outer conflict leads to inner conflict, and ethical behavior is defined as that which prevents outer conflict.



                                        The prerequisite to Jhanas, therefore, is to eliminate all coarse conflicts that serve as obstacles to the attainment of harmony, such as external entanglements and various real life sources of personal drama and regret. Hence the emphasis on ethics, non-attachment, and non-egoism for beginners.



                                        Once the life of an individual is more or less peaceful on a day to day basis, the student can focus solely on their mind and attain Complete Harmony. This is the role of Jhanas.



                                        Jhanas are generally divided into two stages. On the first stage, student uses emotional intelligence techniques to generate a state of happiness. On the second stage, the student contemplates the way things work and perfects the state of harmony, culminating in what's known as suchness. The premise here is that harmony is a refinement of happiness, and suchness is perfectly refined harmony.



                                        The particular techniques used to generate happiness vary between schools. In early Buddhism, the main technique was to review one's own ethical purity, one's philosophical realizations (insights), and one's peaceful lifestyle, comparing that with regular people, and by congratulating oneself on actually measuring up very well, generate the sought state of euphoria.



                                        In conservative descendants (Theravada) this technique was mainly lost, and instead they now practice brute-force one-pointed concentration, which eventually leads to a similar state.



                                        In Tibetan schools, the technique shifts from recalling ones actual achievements, to substituting one's self-image with that of a deity. This is thought to have a better effect, since the imaginary self has no limits to its perfect qualities and can be optimized to counteract particular student's emotional hangups. Naturally, this goes at the expense of no longer having one's ethical achievements be the necessary basis of meditation, which Tibetan schools compensate by greatly emphasizing compassion.



                                        The second phase of jhanas is perfection of harmony. This is when the student realizes that the contrived state of happiness cannot be perfectly sustainable and instead learns to accept the natural uncontrived moment by moment state as the basis for the absence of inner conflict. This deepest acceptance of whatever arises at every moment, inwardly and outwardly, is known as suchness and is the summum bonum of Buddhist path.



                                        Again, the exact technique underwent mutation in historical schools. In Theravada they say that upon contemplating Three Marks of Existence seeing impermanence of all contrived states and inevitably of occasional suffering, the student must go through catharsis of accepting the existential failure, and emerge having completely lost all grasping to any experience.



                                        In most of the meditating Mahayana (such as various types of Chan/Zen), a state of non-judgmental awareness (don't accept, don't reject, just watch) is practiced as a straightforward way of cultivating suchness (following the beginner's breath meditation, therefore skipping the generation phase), but it's place in the big scheme of things is not usually explained, other than mysteriously stating that this is the very state of the Buddha.



                                        Finally, in Tibetan schools, this phase is practiced in conjunction with study of emptiness. For philosophically inclined students, analytical meditation on emptiness serves to dispell doubts that any contrived state cannot be It. What follows from that is staying in a wordless realization of this profound groundlessness, which serves as an entry into suchness. For students of less intellectual bent, the practice takes form of so called meditation of no-meditation, which is a name given to cultivation of appreciation of suchness as the primordially natural state.



                                        In any case, the path usually starts with removal of coarse obstacles, following by cultivation of the seemingly perfectly conflictless state, followed by realization that any contrived state is inherently unsustainable and conflict-driven, followed by contemplation of the implications of this realization, followed by direct cultivation of suchness and complete liberation. The Jhanas symbolically refer to the non-preliminary stages of this sequence.



                                        I think this covers most of what you asked, let me know if you have further questions.






                                        share|improve this answer






















                                        • I was following this post until the following: "In early Buddhism, the main technique was to review one's own ethical purity, one's philosophical realizations (insights), and one's peaceful lifestyle, comparing that with regular people, and by congratulating oneself on actually measuring up very well, generate the sought state of euphoria." I think it needs substantiation. It makes it sound like "jhana" is a euphoria produced by egoism and thinking.
                                          – Dhammadhatu
                                          44 mins ago













                                        up vote
                                        -1
                                        down vote










                                        up vote
                                        -1
                                        down vote









                                        I would say that Jhanas are the final stages of the progressive development of the state of inner harmony, that is the Buddhist path.



                                        The entire Buddhist path is based on one principle, that psychological discomfort comes from inner conflict and that therefore eliminating inner conflict leads to inner harmony. Secondarily, outer conflict leads to inner conflict, and ethical behavior is defined as that which prevents outer conflict.



                                        The prerequisite to Jhanas, therefore, is to eliminate all coarse conflicts that serve as obstacles to the attainment of harmony, such as external entanglements and various real life sources of personal drama and regret. Hence the emphasis on ethics, non-attachment, and non-egoism for beginners.



                                        Once the life of an individual is more or less peaceful on a day to day basis, the student can focus solely on their mind and attain Complete Harmony. This is the role of Jhanas.



                                        Jhanas are generally divided into two stages. On the first stage, student uses emotional intelligence techniques to generate a state of happiness. On the second stage, the student contemplates the way things work and perfects the state of harmony, culminating in what's known as suchness. The premise here is that harmony is a refinement of happiness, and suchness is perfectly refined harmony.



                                        The particular techniques used to generate happiness vary between schools. In early Buddhism, the main technique was to review one's own ethical purity, one's philosophical realizations (insights), and one's peaceful lifestyle, comparing that with regular people, and by congratulating oneself on actually measuring up very well, generate the sought state of euphoria.



                                        In conservative descendants (Theravada) this technique was mainly lost, and instead they now practice brute-force one-pointed concentration, which eventually leads to a similar state.



                                        In Tibetan schools, the technique shifts from recalling ones actual achievements, to substituting one's self-image with that of a deity. This is thought to have a better effect, since the imaginary self has no limits to its perfect qualities and can be optimized to counteract particular student's emotional hangups. Naturally, this goes at the expense of no longer having one's ethical achievements be the necessary basis of meditation, which Tibetan schools compensate by greatly emphasizing compassion.



                                        The second phase of jhanas is perfection of harmony. This is when the student realizes that the contrived state of happiness cannot be perfectly sustainable and instead learns to accept the natural uncontrived moment by moment state as the basis for the absence of inner conflict. This deepest acceptance of whatever arises at every moment, inwardly and outwardly, is known as suchness and is the summum bonum of Buddhist path.



                                        Again, the exact technique underwent mutation in historical schools. In Theravada they say that upon contemplating Three Marks of Existence seeing impermanence of all contrived states and inevitably of occasional suffering, the student must go through catharsis of accepting the existential failure, and emerge having completely lost all grasping to any experience.



                                        In most of the meditating Mahayana (such as various types of Chan/Zen), a state of non-judgmental awareness (don't accept, don't reject, just watch) is practiced as a straightforward way of cultivating suchness (following the beginner's breath meditation, therefore skipping the generation phase), but it's place in the big scheme of things is not usually explained, other than mysteriously stating that this is the very state of the Buddha.



                                        Finally, in Tibetan schools, this phase is practiced in conjunction with study of emptiness. For philosophically inclined students, analytical meditation on emptiness serves to dispell doubts that any contrived state cannot be It. What follows from that is staying in a wordless realization of this profound groundlessness, which serves as an entry into suchness. For students of less intellectual bent, the practice takes form of so called meditation of no-meditation, which is a name given to cultivation of appreciation of suchness as the primordially natural state.



                                        In any case, the path usually starts with removal of coarse obstacles, following by cultivation of the seemingly perfectly conflictless state, followed by realization that any contrived state is inherently unsustainable and conflict-driven, followed by contemplation of the implications of this realization, followed by direct cultivation of suchness and complete liberation. The Jhanas symbolically refer to the non-preliminary stages of this sequence.



                                        I think this covers most of what you asked, let me know if you have further questions.






                                        share|improve this answer














                                        I would say that Jhanas are the final stages of the progressive development of the state of inner harmony, that is the Buddhist path.



                                        The entire Buddhist path is based on one principle, that psychological discomfort comes from inner conflict and that therefore eliminating inner conflict leads to inner harmony. Secondarily, outer conflict leads to inner conflict, and ethical behavior is defined as that which prevents outer conflict.



                                        The prerequisite to Jhanas, therefore, is to eliminate all coarse conflicts that serve as obstacles to the attainment of harmony, such as external entanglements and various real life sources of personal drama and regret. Hence the emphasis on ethics, non-attachment, and non-egoism for beginners.



                                        Once the life of an individual is more or less peaceful on a day to day basis, the student can focus solely on their mind and attain Complete Harmony. This is the role of Jhanas.



                                        Jhanas are generally divided into two stages. On the first stage, student uses emotional intelligence techniques to generate a state of happiness. On the second stage, the student contemplates the way things work and perfects the state of harmony, culminating in what's known as suchness. The premise here is that harmony is a refinement of happiness, and suchness is perfectly refined harmony.



                                        The particular techniques used to generate happiness vary between schools. In early Buddhism, the main technique was to review one's own ethical purity, one's philosophical realizations (insights), and one's peaceful lifestyle, comparing that with regular people, and by congratulating oneself on actually measuring up very well, generate the sought state of euphoria.



                                        In conservative descendants (Theravada) this technique was mainly lost, and instead they now practice brute-force one-pointed concentration, which eventually leads to a similar state.



                                        In Tibetan schools, the technique shifts from recalling ones actual achievements, to substituting one's self-image with that of a deity. This is thought to have a better effect, since the imaginary self has no limits to its perfect qualities and can be optimized to counteract particular student's emotional hangups. Naturally, this goes at the expense of no longer having one's ethical achievements be the necessary basis of meditation, which Tibetan schools compensate by greatly emphasizing compassion.



                                        The second phase of jhanas is perfection of harmony. This is when the student realizes that the contrived state of happiness cannot be perfectly sustainable and instead learns to accept the natural uncontrived moment by moment state as the basis for the absence of inner conflict. This deepest acceptance of whatever arises at every moment, inwardly and outwardly, is known as suchness and is the summum bonum of Buddhist path.



                                        Again, the exact technique underwent mutation in historical schools. In Theravada they say that upon contemplating Three Marks of Existence seeing impermanence of all contrived states and inevitably of occasional suffering, the student must go through catharsis of accepting the existential failure, and emerge having completely lost all grasping to any experience.



                                        In most of the meditating Mahayana (such as various types of Chan/Zen), a state of non-judgmental awareness (don't accept, don't reject, just watch) is practiced as a straightforward way of cultivating suchness (following the beginner's breath meditation, therefore skipping the generation phase), but it's place in the big scheme of things is not usually explained, other than mysteriously stating that this is the very state of the Buddha.



                                        Finally, in Tibetan schools, this phase is practiced in conjunction with study of emptiness. For philosophically inclined students, analytical meditation on emptiness serves to dispell doubts that any contrived state cannot be It. What follows from that is staying in a wordless realization of this profound groundlessness, which serves as an entry into suchness. For students of less intellectual bent, the practice takes form of so called meditation of no-meditation, which is a name given to cultivation of appreciation of suchness as the primordially natural state.



                                        In any case, the path usually starts with removal of coarse obstacles, following by cultivation of the seemingly perfectly conflictless state, followed by realization that any contrived state is inherently unsustainable and conflict-driven, followed by contemplation of the implications of this realization, followed by direct cultivation of suchness and complete liberation. The Jhanas symbolically refer to the non-preliminary stages of this sequence.



                                        I think this covers most of what you asked, let me know if you have further questions.







                                        share|improve this answer














                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer








                                        edited 1 hour ago

























                                        answered 2 hours ago









                                        Andrei Volkov♦

                                        35.3k229103




                                        35.3k229103











                                        • I was following this post until the following: "In early Buddhism, the main technique was to review one's own ethical purity, one's philosophical realizations (insights), and one's peaceful lifestyle, comparing that with regular people, and by congratulating oneself on actually measuring up very well, generate the sought state of euphoria." I think it needs substantiation. It makes it sound like "jhana" is a euphoria produced by egoism and thinking.
                                          – Dhammadhatu
                                          44 mins ago

















                                        • I was following this post until the following: "In early Buddhism, the main technique was to review one's own ethical purity, one's philosophical realizations (insights), and one's peaceful lifestyle, comparing that with regular people, and by congratulating oneself on actually measuring up very well, generate the sought state of euphoria." I think it needs substantiation. It makes it sound like "jhana" is a euphoria produced by egoism and thinking.
                                          – Dhammadhatu
                                          44 mins ago
















                                        I was following this post until the following: "In early Buddhism, the main technique was to review one's own ethical purity, one's philosophical realizations (insights), and one's peaceful lifestyle, comparing that with regular people, and by congratulating oneself on actually measuring up very well, generate the sought state of euphoria." I think it needs substantiation. It makes it sound like "jhana" is a euphoria produced by egoism and thinking.
                                        – Dhammadhatu
                                        44 mins ago





                                        I was following this post until the following: "In early Buddhism, the main technique was to review one's own ethical purity, one's philosophical realizations (insights), and one's peaceful lifestyle, comparing that with regular people, and by congratulating oneself on actually measuring up very well, generate the sought state of euphoria." I think it needs substantiation. It makes it sound like "jhana" is a euphoria produced by egoism and thinking.
                                        – Dhammadhatu
                                        44 mins ago


















                                         

                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded















































                                         


                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29256%2fbuddhist-jhanas-how-best-to-describe-them%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest













































































                                        Comments

                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                                        Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

                                        Confectionery