Audio and video… and tango?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
6
down vote

favorite












Audio and video are two (apparently XX-century) concepts.



Both take the same form as 1st-person sing., present tense Latin verbs. Wiktionary articles for the English words (audio, video) assert that their etymology actually is that of those verbal forms, and so does Etymonline (audio, video).



I could be wrong, but I can't think of any older word derived from Latin in this way. Instead, it reminds me of some initial translation attempts by people with little inflectional background, looking for dictionary entries for verbs, assuming that the verb is its 1st-pers. s. form.



This sounds wrong to me, as I can't see a reason why someone could want to name something an I see recorder, or an I hear wave.



Question: Is there a reason to draw these words from that verbal forms in specific? Or is it just bad Latin from an era when Latin is no longer the language of science?



Bonus fact: I thought the same applied to tango, but it seems to have a different origin.







share|improve this question




















  • What about studio? Would it come from studeo or from studium?
    – luchonacho
    Sep 7 at 10:06














up vote
6
down vote

favorite












Audio and video are two (apparently XX-century) concepts.



Both take the same form as 1st-person sing., present tense Latin verbs. Wiktionary articles for the English words (audio, video) assert that their etymology actually is that of those verbal forms, and so does Etymonline (audio, video).



I could be wrong, but I can't think of any older word derived from Latin in this way. Instead, it reminds me of some initial translation attempts by people with little inflectional background, looking for dictionary entries for verbs, assuming that the verb is its 1st-pers. s. form.



This sounds wrong to me, as I can't see a reason why someone could want to name something an I see recorder, or an I hear wave.



Question: Is there a reason to draw these words from that verbal forms in specific? Or is it just bad Latin from an era when Latin is no longer the language of science?



Bonus fact: I thought the same applied to tango, but it seems to have a different origin.







share|improve this question




















  • What about studio? Would it come from studeo or from studium?
    – luchonacho
    Sep 7 at 10:06












up vote
6
down vote

favorite









up vote
6
down vote

favorite











Audio and video are two (apparently XX-century) concepts.



Both take the same form as 1st-person sing., present tense Latin verbs. Wiktionary articles for the English words (audio, video) assert that their etymology actually is that of those verbal forms, and so does Etymonline (audio, video).



I could be wrong, but I can't think of any older word derived from Latin in this way. Instead, it reminds me of some initial translation attempts by people with little inflectional background, looking for dictionary entries for verbs, assuming that the verb is its 1st-pers. s. form.



This sounds wrong to me, as I can't see a reason why someone could want to name something an I see recorder, or an I hear wave.



Question: Is there a reason to draw these words from that verbal forms in specific? Or is it just bad Latin from an era when Latin is no longer the language of science?



Bonus fact: I thought the same applied to tango, but it seems to have a different origin.







share|improve this question












Audio and video are two (apparently XX-century) concepts.



Both take the same form as 1st-person sing., present tense Latin verbs. Wiktionary articles for the English words (audio, video) assert that their etymology actually is that of those verbal forms, and so does Etymonline (audio, video).



I could be wrong, but I can't think of any older word derived from Latin in this way. Instead, it reminds me of some initial translation attempts by people with little inflectional background, looking for dictionary entries for verbs, assuming that the verb is its 1st-pers. s. form.



This sounds wrong to me, as I can't see a reason why someone could want to name something an I see recorder, or an I hear wave.



Question: Is there a reason to draw these words from that verbal forms in specific? Or is it just bad Latin from an era when Latin is no longer the language of science?



Bonus fact: I thought the same applied to tango, but it seems to have a different origin.









share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Sep 5 at 19:49









Rafael

5,5152937




5,5152937











  • What about studio? Would it come from studeo or from studium?
    – luchonacho
    Sep 7 at 10:06
















  • What about studio? Would it come from studeo or from studium?
    – luchonacho
    Sep 7 at 10:06















What about studio? Would it come from studeo or from studium?
– luchonacho
Sep 7 at 10:06




What about studio? Would it come from studeo or from studium?
– luchonacho
Sep 7 at 10:06










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













The Oxford English Dictionary indicates that the O in audio, video and radio comes from the O found in Greek compounds, which was used in scientific vocabulary built from Latin and Greek roots: e.g. audiology or radiometer.



Note that the Etymonline entry for audio actually seems to say the same thing:




abstracted from word-forming element audio- (q.v.), which is from Latin audire "to hear"







share|improve this answer






















  • Hmm, so the OED suggests it's mixed etymology (Latin-Greek), just as television, which is arguably bad, but not as bad as I thought. But then again, is Etymonline not to be trusted?
    – Rafael
    Sep 5 at 20:51







  • 4




    OED is a serious scholarly work. Etymonline is a paste job.
    – fdb
    Sep 5 at 22:06










  • @fdb I don't doubt OED either. I just wondered whether the 1st. p. s. could still be a valid competing theory
    – Rafael
    Sep 5 at 22:23











Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "644"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f7151%2faudio-and-video-and-tango%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote













The Oxford English Dictionary indicates that the O in audio, video and radio comes from the O found in Greek compounds, which was used in scientific vocabulary built from Latin and Greek roots: e.g. audiology or radiometer.



Note that the Etymonline entry for audio actually seems to say the same thing:




abstracted from word-forming element audio- (q.v.), which is from Latin audire "to hear"







share|improve this answer






















  • Hmm, so the OED suggests it's mixed etymology (Latin-Greek), just as television, which is arguably bad, but not as bad as I thought. But then again, is Etymonline not to be trusted?
    – Rafael
    Sep 5 at 20:51







  • 4




    OED is a serious scholarly work. Etymonline is a paste job.
    – fdb
    Sep 5 at 22:06










  • @fdb I don't doubt OED either. I just wondered whether the 1st. p. s. could still be a valid competing theory
    – Rafael
    Sep 5 at 22:23















up vote
3
down vote













The Oxford English Dictionary indicates that the O in audio, video and radio comes from the O found in Greek compounds, which was used in scientific vocabulary built from Latin and Greek roots: e.g. audiology or radiometer.



Note that the Etymonline entry for audio actually seems to say the same thing:




abstracted from word-forming element audio- (q.v.), which is from Latin audire "to hear"







share|improve this answer






















  • Hmm, so the OED suggests it's mixed etymology (Latin-Greek), just as television, which is arguably bad, but not as bad as I thought. But then again, is Etymonline not to be trusted?
    – Rafael
    Sep 5 at 20:51







  • 4




    OED is a serious scholarly work. Etymonline is a paste job.
    – fdb
    Sep 5 at 22:06










  • @fdb I don't doubt OED either. I just wondered whether the 1st. p. s. could still be a valid competing theory
    – Rafael
    Sep 5 at 22:23













up vote
3
down vote










up vote
3
down vote









The Oxford English Dictionary indicates that the O in audio, video and radio comes from the O found in Greek compounds, which was used in scientific vocabulary built from Latin and Greek roots: e.g. audiology or radiometer.



Note that the Etymonline entry for audio actually seems to say the same thing:




abstracted from word-forming element audio- (q.v.), which is from Latin audire "to hear"







share|improve this answer














The Oxford English Dictionary indicates that the O in audio, video and radio comes from the O found in Greek compounds, which was used in scientific vocabulary built from Latin and Greek roots: e.g. audiology or radiometer.



Note that the Etymonline entry for audio actually seems to say the same thing:




abstracted from word-forming element audio- (q.v.), which is from Latin audire "to hear"








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Sep 5 at 22:07

























answered Sep 5 at 20:41









sumelic

5,79411344




5,79411344











  • Hmm, so the OED suggests it's mixed etymology (Latin-Greek), just as television, which is arguably bad, but not as bad as I thought. But then again, is Etymonline not to be trusted?
    – Rafael
    Sep 5 at 20:51







  • 4




    OED is a serious scholarly work. Etymonline is a paste job.
    – fdb
    Sep 5 at 22:06










  • @fdb I don't doubt OED either. I just wondered whether the 1st. p. s. could still be a valid competing theory
    – Rafael
    Sep 5 at 22:23

















  • Hmm, so the OED suggests it's mixed etymology (Latin-Greek), just as television, which is arguably bad, but not as bad as I thought. But then again, is Etymonline not to be trusted?
    – Rafael
    Sep 5 at 20:51







  • 4




    OED is a serious scholarly work. Etymonline is a paste job.
    – fdb
    Sep 5 at 22:06










  • @fdb I don't doubt OED either. I just wondered whether the 1st. p. s. could still be a valid competing theory
    – Rafael
    Sep 5 at 22:23
















Hmm, so the OED suggests it's mixed etymology (Latin-Greek), just as television, which is arguably bad, but not as bad as I thought. But then again, is Etymonline not to be trusted?
– Rafael
Sep 5 at 20:51





Hmm, so the OED suggests it's mixed etymology (Latin-Greek), just as television, which is arguably bad, but not as bad as I thought. But then again, is Etymonline not to be trusted?
– Rafael
Sep 5 at 20:51





4




4




OED is a serious scholarly work. Etymonline is a paste job.
– fdb
Sep 5 at 22:06




OED is a serious scholarly work. Etymonline is a paste job.
– fdb
Sep 5 at 22:06












@fdb I don't doubt OED either. I just wondered whether the 1st. p. s. could still be a valid competing theory
– Rafael
Sep 5 at 22:23





@fdb I don't doubt OED either. I just wondered whether the 1st. p. s. could still be a valid competing theory
– Rafael
Sep 5 at 22:23


















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f7151%2faudio-and-video-and-tango%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What does second last employer means? [closed]

List of Gilmore Girls characters

Confectionery