Mate in one with NO PIECES?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
The following pictures depict chess positions one move before white checkmated black:
The problem is, I seemed to have completely lost which pieces each letter/number represents. All I know is that the number substitution of the pieces is consistent across the board and that
1-7 include 2 pawns, 1 knight, 1 bishop, 1 rook, 1 queen, and 1 king
A-F include 1 pawn, 1 knight, 1 bishop, 1 rook, 1 queen, and 1 king.
Text boards:
-------A
E-------
-----4--
----CB3-
------26
------D-
--------
-------7
---B----
-16--F--
---3-E--
-A--4---
---7----
------D-
--------
--------
-3------
574-----
--------
--------
--------
--------
--------
---C-D--
So... what piece does each character represent?
Took inspiration from the snakes and ladders retrograde analysis puzzle and decided to make a non-retrograde analysis chess puzzle (which doesn't count in the fortnightly topic challenge :( )
logical-deduction chess
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
The following pictures depict chess positions one move before white checkmated black:
The problem is, I seemed to have completely lost which pieces each letter/number represents. All I know is that the number substitution of the pieces is consistent across the board and that
1-7 include 2 pawns, 1 knight, 1 bishop, 1 rook, 1 queen, and 1 king
A-F include 1 pawn, 1 knight, 1 bishop, 1 rook, 1 queen, and 1 king.
Text boards:
-------A
E-------
-----4--
----CB3-
------26
------D-
--------
-------7
---B----
-16--F--
---3-E--
-A--4---
---7----
------D-
--------
--------
-3------
574-----
--------
--------
--------
--------
--------
---C-D--
So... what piece does each character represent?
Took inspiration from the snakes and ladders retrograde analysis puzzle and decided to make a non-retrograde analysis chess puzzle (which doesn't count in the fortnightly topic challenge :( )
logical-deduction chess
1
Like the puzzle idea! +1
– BmyGuest
8 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
The following pictures depict chess positions one move before white checkmated black:
The problem is, I seemed to have completely lost which pieces each letter/number represents. All I know is that the number substitution of the pieces is consistent across the board and that
1-7 include 2 pawns, 1 knight, 1 bishop, 1 rook, 1 queen, and 1 king
A-F include 1 pawn, 1 knight, 1 bishop, 1 rook, 1 queen, and 1 king.
Text boards:
-------A
E-------
-----4--
----CB3-
------26
------D-
--------
-------7
---B----
-16--F--
---3-E--
-A--4---
---7----
------D-
--------
--------
-3------
574-----
--------
--------
--------
--------
--------
---C-D--
So... what piece does each character represent?
Took inspiration from the snakes and ladders retrograde analysis puzzle and decided to make a non-retrograde analysis chess puzzle (which doesn't count in the fortnightly topic challenge :( )
logical-deduction chess
The following pictures depict chess positions one move before white checkmated black:
The problem is, I seemed to have completely lost which pieces each letter/number represents. All I know is that the number substitution of the pieces is consistent across the board and that
1-7 include 2 pawns, 1 knight, 1 bishop, 1 rook, 1 queen, and 1 king
A-F include 1 pawn, 1 knight, 1 bishop, 1 rook, 1 queen, and 1 king.
Text boards:
-------A
E-------
-----4--
----CB3-
------26
------D-
--------
-------7
---B----
-16--F--
---3-E--
-A--4---
---7----
------D-
--------
--------
-3------
574-----
--------
--------
--------
--------
--------
---C-D--
So... what piece does each character represent?
Took inspiration from the snakes and ladders retrograde analysis puzzle and decided to make a non-retrograde analysis chess puzzle (which doesn't count in the fortnightly topic challenge :( )
logical-deduction chess
logical-deduction chess
edited 2 hours ago
asked 3 hours ago


awesomepi
1,534845
1,534845
1
Like the puzzle idea! +1
– BmyGuest
8 mins ago
add a comment |Â
1
Like the puzzle idea! +1
– BmyGuest
8 mins ago
1
1
Like the puzzle idea! +1
– BmyGuest
8 mins ago
Like the puzzle idea! +1
– BmyGuest
8 mins ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The #3 looks like a
back rank mate, so 3 is the black king. C is missing from #2, so that can't be the king, which means that the white pieces in #3 are D=king and C=queen/rook. The only way the position is a mate in 1 is if 4 is a pawn and 7 is a rook.
The pieces in #1 and #2
can't be attacking the opposing king, so
- B can't be a queen or a rook (#1)
- E can't be a queen or a rook (#2)
- F can't be a knight (#1)
- 2 can't be a queen or a rook (#1)
- 4 can't be a bishop or a queen (#2)
- 6 can't be a bishop or a pawn (#1)
- 7 can't be a knight (#1)
Pawns can't be
on the 1st/8th rank, so A, B and 7 can't be pawns.
In #1 the mating move looks like
Qh6 by A=queen, protected by B=knight.
So the white pieces are
A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, with E and F being a bishop or a pawn.
Substituting the known pieces in #2,
Having F be a pawn would make it possible to mate with f8=Q, with all escape squares covered by white pieces.
Now we just give the black pieces some combination which makes the #2 position a checkmate after that move.
1 pawn, 2 bishop, 3 king, 4 pawn, 5 queen, 6 knight, 7 rook.
A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, E bishop, F pawn.
The boards with all pieces:
1
I spent the last two hours typing out in paragraph form all of this. You beat me to it though by 7 minutes. Nice work.
– Arpeyji
24 mins ago
Good job! Some logic questions: On your first step, couldn't it be possible for 4 to be a knight? Also, on your second step, white could possibly be in check as long as they removed the threat on the mate, right?
– Jo.
13 mins ago
@Jo. Hmm that's true, good points. I had thought about 4 being a knight, then disregarded it when I thought C was the white king, and forgot to add the possibility back. The second point hadn't occurred to me at all :P
– jafe
8 mins ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The #3 looks like a
back rank mate, so 3 is the black king. C is missing from #2, so that can't be the king, which means that the white pieces in #3 are D=king and C=queen/rook. The only way the position is a mate in 1 is if 4 is a pawn and 7 is a rook.
The pieces in #1 and #2
can't be attacking the opposing king, so
- B can't be a queen or a rook (#1)
- E can't be a queen or a rook (#2)
- F can't be a knight (#1)
- 2 can't be a queen or a rook (#1)
- 4 can't be a bishop or a queen (#2)
- 6 can't be a bishop or a pawn (#1)
- 7 can't be a knight (#1)
Pawns can't be
on the 1st/8th rank, so A, B and 7 can't be pawns.
In #1 the mating move looks like
Qh6 by A=queen, protected by B=knight.
So the white pieces are
A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, with E and F being a bishop or a pawn.
Substituting the known pieces in #2,
Having F be a pawn would make it possible to mate with f8=Q, with all escape squares covered by white pieces.
Now we just give the black pieces some combination which makes the #2 position a checkmate after that move.
1 pawn, 2 bishop, 3 king, 4 pawn, 5 queen, 6 knight, 7 rook.
A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, E bishop, F pawn.
The boards with all pieces:
1
I spent the last two hours typing out in paragraph form all of this. You beat me to it though by 7 minutes. Nice work.
– Arpeyji
24 mins ago
Good job! Some logic questions: On your first step, couldn't it be possible for 4 to be a knight? Also, on your second step, white could possibly be in check as long as they removed the threat on the mate, right?
– Jo.
13 mins ago
@Jo. Hmm that's true, good points. I had thought about 4 being a knight, then disregarded it when I thought C was the white king, and forgot to add the possibility back. The second point hadn't occurred to me at all :P
– jafe
8 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The #3 looks like a
back rank mate, so 3 is the black king. C is missing from #2, so that can't be the king, which means that the white pieces in #3 are D=king and C=queen/rook. The only way the position is a mate in 1 is if 4 is a pawn and 7 is a rook.
The pieces in #1 and #2
can't be attacking the opposing king, so
- B can't be a queen or a rook (#1)
- E can't be a queen or a rook (#2)
- F can't be a knight (#1)
- 2 can't be a queen or a rook (#1)
- 4 can't be a bishop or a queen (#2)
- 6 can't be a bishop or a pawn (#1)
- 7 can't be a knight (#1)
Pawns can't be
on the 1st/8th rank, so A, B and 7 can't be pawns.
In #1 the mating move looks like
Qh6 by A=queen, protected by B=knight.
So the white pieces are
A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, with E and F being a bishop or a pawn.
Substituting the known pieces in #2,
Having F be a pawn would make it possible to mate with f8=Q, with all escape squares covered by white pieces.
Now we just give the black pieces some combination which makes the #2 position a checkmate after that move.
1 pawn, 2 bishop, 3 king, 4 pawn, 5 queen, 6 knight, 7 rook.
A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, E bishop, F pawn.
The boards with all pieces:
1
I spent the last two hours typing out in paragraph form all of this. You beat me to it though by 7 minutes. Nice work.
– Arpeyji
24 mins ago
Good job! Some logic questions: On your first step, couldn't it be possible for 4 to be a knight? Also, on your second step, white could possibly be in check as long as they removed the threat on the mate, right?
– Jo.
13 mins ago
@Jo. Hmm that's true, good points. I had thought about 4 being a knight, then disregarded it when I thought C was the white king, and forgot to add the possibility back. The second point hadn't occurred to me at all :P
– jafe
8 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The #3 looks like a
back rank mate, so 3 is the black king. C is missing from #2, so that can't be the king, which means that the white pieces in #3 are D=king and C=queen/rook. The only way the position is a mate in 1 is if 4 is a pawn and 7 is a rook.
The pieces in #1 and #2
can't be attacking the opposing king, so
- B can't be a queen or a rook (#1)
- E can't be a queen or a rook (#2)
- F can't be a knight (#1)
- 2 can't be a queen or a rook (#1)
- 4 can't be a bishop or a queen (#2)
- 6 can't be a bishop or a pawn (#1)
- 7 can't be a knight (#1)
Pawns can't be
on the 1st/8th rank, so A, B and 7 can't be pawns.
In #1 the mating move looks like
Qh6 by A=queen, protected by B=knight.
So the white pieces are
A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, with E and F being a bishop or a pawn.
Substituting the known pieces in #2,
Having F be a pawn would make it possible to mate with f8=Q, with all escape squares covered by white pieces.
Now we just give the black pieces some combination which makes the #2 position a checkmate after that move.
1 pawn, 2 bishop, 3 king, 4 pawn, 5 queen, 6 knight, 7 rook.
A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, E bishop, F pawn.
The boards with all pieces:
The #3 looks like a
back rank mate, so 3 is the black king. C is missing from #2, so that can't be the king, which means that the white pieces in #3 are D=king and C=queen/rook. The only way the position is a mate in 1 is if 4 is a pawn and 7 is a rook.
The pieces in #1 and #2
can't be attacking the opposing king, so
- B can't be a queen or a rook (#1)
- E can't be a queen or a rook (#2)
- F can't be a knight (#1)
- 2 can't be a queen or a rook (#1)
- 4 can't be a bishop or a queen (#2)
- 6 can't be a bishop or a pawn (#1)
- 7 can't be a knight (#1)
Pawns can't be
on the 1st/8th rank, so A, B and 7 can't be pawns.
In #1 the mating move looks like
Qh6 by A=queen, protected by B=knight.
So the white pieces are
A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, with E and F being a bishop or a pawn.
Substituting the known pieces in #2,
Having F be a pawn would make it possible to mate with f8=Q, with all escape squares covered by white pieces.
Now we just give the black pieces some combination which makes the #2 position a checkmate after that move.
1 pawn, 2 bishop, 3 king, 4 pawn, 5 queen, 6 knight, 7 rook.
A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, E bishop, F pawn.
The boards with all pieces:
edited 18 mins ago
answered 35 mins ago
jafe
9,19819102
9,19819102
1
I spent the last two hours typing out in paragraph form all of this. You beat me to it though by 7 minutes. Nice work.
– Arpeyji
24 mins ago
Good job! Some logic questions: On your first step, couldn't it be possible for 4 to be a knight? Also, on your second step, white could possibly be in check as long as they removed the threat on the mate, right?
– Jo.
13 mins ago
@Jo. Hmm that's true, good points. I had thought about 4 being a knight, then disregarded it when I thought C was the white king, and forgot to add the possibility back. The second point hadn't occurred to me at all :P
– jafe
8 mins ago
add a comment |Â
1
I spent the last two hours typing out in paragraph form all of this. You beat me to it though by 7 minutes. Nice work.
– Arpeyji
24 mins ago
Good job! Some logic questions: On your first step, couldn't it be possible for 4 to be a knight? Also, on your second step, white could possibly be in check as long as they removed the threat on the mate, right?
– Jo.
13 mins ago
@Jo. Hmm that's true, good points. I had thought about 4 being a knight, then disregarded it when I thought C was the white king, and forgot to add the possibility back. The second point hadn't occurred to me at all :P
– jafe
8 mins ago
1
1
I spent the last two hours typing out in paragraph form all of this. You beat me to it though by 7 minutes. Nice work.
– Arpeyji
24 mins ago
I spent the last two hours typing out in paragraph form all of this. You beat me to it though by 7 minutes. Nice work.
– Arpeyji
24 mins ago
Good job! Some logic questions: On your first step, couldn't it be possible for 4 to be a knight? Also, on your second step, white could possibly be in check as long as they removed the threat on the mate, right?
– Jo.
13 mins ago
Good job! Some logic questions: On your first step, couldn't it be possible for 4 to be a knight? Also, on your second step, white could possibly be in check as long as they removed the threat on the mate, right?
– Jo.
13 mins ago
@Jo. Hmm that's true, good points. I had thought about 4 being a knight, then disregarded it when I thought C was the white king, and forgot to add the possibility back. The second point hadn't occurred to me at all :P
– jafe
8 mins ago
@Jo. Hmm that's true, good points. I had thought about 4 being a knight, then disregarded it when I thought C was the white king, and forgot to add the possibility back. The second point hadn't occurred to me at all :P
– jafe
8 mins ago
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f74323%2fmate-in-one-with-no-pieces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
Like the puzzle idea! +1
– BmyGuest
8 mins ago