Mate in one with NO PIECES?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
7
down vote

favorite












The following pictures depict chess positions one move before white checkmated black:



boards



The problem is, I seemed to have completely lost which pieces each letter/number represents. All I know is that the number substitution of the pieces is consistent across the board and that




1-7 include 2 pawns, 1 knight, 1 bishop, 1 rook, 1 queen, and 1 king



A-F include 1 pawn, 1 knight, 1 bishop, 1 rook, 1 queen, and 1 king.




Text boards:



-------A
E-------
-----4--
----CB3-
------26
------D-
--------
-------7

---B----
-16--F--
---3-E--
-A--4---
---7----
------D-
--------
--------

-3------
574-----
--------
--------
--------
--------
--------
---C-D--


So... what piece does each character represent?




Took inspiration from the snakes and ladders retrograde analysis puzzle and decided to make a non-retrograde analysis chess puzzle (which doesn't count in the fortnightly topic challenge :( )










share|improve this question



















  • 1




    Like the puzzle idea! +1
    – BmyGuest
    8 mins ago














up vote
7
down vote

favorite












The following pictures depict chess positions one move before white checkmated black:



boards



The problem is, I seemed to have completely lost which pieces each letter/number represents. All I know is that the number substitution of the pieces is consistent across the board and that




1-7 include 2 pawns, 1 knight, 1 bishop, 1 rook, 1 queen, and 1 king



A-F include 1 pawn, 1 knight, 1 bishop, 1 rook, 1 queen, and 1 king.




Text boards:



-------A
E-------
-----4--
----CB3-
------26
------D-
--------
-------7

---B----
-16--F--
---3-E--
-A--4---
---7----
------D-
--------
--------

-3------
574-----
--------
--------
--------
--------
--------
---C-D--


So... what piece does each character represent?




Took inspiration from the snakes and ladders retrograde analysis puzzle and decided to make a non-retrograde analysis chess puzzle (which doesn't count in the fortnightly topic challenge :( )










share|improve this question



















  • 1




    Like the puzzle idea! +1
    – BmyGuest
    8 mins ago












up vote
7
down vote

favorite









up vote
7
down vote

favorite











The following pictures depict chess positions one move before white checkmated black:



boards



The problem is, I seemed to have completely lost which pieces each letter/number represents. All I know is that the number substitution of the pieces is consistent across the board and that




1-7 include 2 pawns, 1 knight, 1 bishop, 1 rook, 1 queen, and 1 king



A-F include 1 pawn, 1 knight, 1 bishop, 1 rook, 1 queen, and 1 king.




Text boards:



-------A
E-------
-----4--
----CB3-
------26
------D-
--------
-------7

---B----
-16--F--
---3-E--
-A--4---
---7----
------D-
--------
--------

-3------
574-----
--------
--------
--------
--------
--------
---C-D--


So... what piece does each character represent?




Took inspiration from the snakes and ladders retrograde analysis puzzle and decided to make a non-retrograde analysis chess puzzle (which doesn't count in the fortnightly topic challenge :( )










share|improve this question















The following pictures depict chess positions one move before white checkmated black:



boards



The problem is, I seemed to have completely lost which pieces each letter/number represents. All I know is that the number substitution of the pieces is consistent across the board and that




1-7 include 2 pawns, 1 knight, 1 bishop, 1 rook, 1 queen, and 1 king



A-F include 1 pawn, 1 knight, 1 bishop, 1 rook, 1 queen, and 1 king.




Text boards:



-------A
E-------
-----4--
----CB3-
------26
------D-
--------
-------7

---B----
-16--F--
---3-E--
-A--4---
---7----
------D-
--------
--------

-3------
574-----
--------
--------
--------
--------
--------
---C-D--


So... what piece does each character represent?




Took inspiration from the snakes and ladders retrograde analysis puzzle and decided to make a non-retrograde analysis chess puzzle (which doesn't count in the fortnightly topic challenge :( )







logical-deduction chess






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago

























asked 3 hours ago









awesomepi

1,534845




1,534845







  • 1




    Like the puzzle idea! +1
    – BmyGuest
    8 mins ago












  • 1




    Like the puzzle idea! +1
    – BmyGuest
    8 mins ago







1




1




Like the puzzle idea! +1
– BmyGuest
8 mins ago




Like the puzzle idea! +1
– BmyGuest
8 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










The #3 looks like a




back rank mate, so 3 is the black king. C is missing from #2, so that can't be the king, which means that the white pieces in #3 are D=king and C=queen/rook. The only way the position is a mate in 1 is if 4 is a pawn and 7 is a rook.




The pieces in #1 and #2




can't be attacking the opposing king, so

- B can't be a queen or a rook (#1)

- E can't be a queen or a rook (#2)

- F can't be a knight (#1)

- 2 can't be a queen or a rook (#1)

- 4 can't be a bishop or a queen (#2)

- 6 can't be a bishop or a pawn (#1)

- 7 can't be a knight (#1)




Pawns can't be




on the 1st/8th rank, so A, B and 7 can't be pawns.




In #1 the mating move looks like




Qh6 by A=queen, protected by B=knight.




So the white pieces are




A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, with E and F being a bishop or a pawn.




Substituting the known pieces in #2,




Having F be a pawn would make it possible to mate with f8=Q, with all escape squares covered by white pieces.




Now we just give the black pieces some combination which makes the #2 position a checkmate after that move.




1 pawn, 2 bishop, 3 king, 4 pawn, 5 queen, 6 knight, 7 rook.

A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, E bishop, F pawn.




The boards with all pieces:




enter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here







share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    I spent the last two hours typing out in paragraph form all of this. You beat me to it though by 7 minutes. Nice work.
    – Arpeyji
    24 mins ago










  • Good job! Some logic questions: On your first step, couldn't it be possible for 4 to be a knight? Also, on your second step, white could possibly be in check as long as they removed the threat on the mate, right?
    – Jo.
    13 mins ago










  • @Jo. Hmm that's true, good points. I had thought about 4 being a knight, then disregarded it when I thought C was the white king, and forgot to add the possibility back. The second point hadn't occurred to me at all :P
    – jafe
    8 mins ago










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f74323%2fmate-in-one-with-no-pieces%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote



accepted










The #3 looks like a




back rank mate, so 3 is the black king. C is missing from #2, so that can't be the king, which means that the white pieces in #3 are D=king and C=queen/rook. The only way the position is a mate in 1 is if 4 is a pawn and 7 is a rook.




The pieces in #1 and #2




can't be attacking the opposing king, so

- B can't be a queen or a rook (#1)

- E can't be a queen or a rook (#2)

- F can't be a knight (#1)

- 2 can't be a queen or a rook (#1)

- 4 can't be a bishop or a queen (#2)

- 6 can't be a bishop or a pawn (#1)

- 7 can't be a knight (#1)




Pawns can't be




on the 1st/8th rank, so A, B and 7 can't be pawns.




In #1 the mating move looks like




Qh6 by A=queen, protected by B=knight.




So the white pieces are




A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, with E and F being a bishop or a pawn.




Substituting the known pieces in #2,




Having F be a pawn would make it possible to mate with f8=Q, with all escape squares covered by white pieces.




Now we just give the black pieces some combination which makes the #2 position a checkmate after that move.




1 pawn, 2 bishop, 3 king, 4 pawn, 5 queen, 6 knight, 7 rook.

A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, E bishop, F pawn.




The boards with all pieces:




enter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here







share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    I spent the last two hours typing out in paragraph form all of this. You beat me to it though by 7 minutes. Nice work.
    – Arpeyji
    24 mins ago










  • Good job! Some logic questions: On your first step, couldn't it be possible for 4 to be a knight? Also, on your second step, white could possibly be in check as long as they removed the threat on the mate, right?
    – Jo.
    13 mins ago










  • @Jo. Hmm that's true, good points. I had thought about 4 being a knight, then disregarded it when I thought C was the white king, and forgot to add the possibility back. The second point hadn't occurred to me at all :P
    – jafe
    8 mins ago














up vote
3
down vote



accepted










The #3 looks like a




back rank mate, so 3 is the black king. C is missing from #2, so that can't be the king, which means that the white pieces in #3 are D=king and C=queen/rook. The only way the position is a mate in 1 is if 4 is a pawn and 7 is a rook.




The pieces in #1 and #2




can't be attacking the opposing king, so

- B can't be a queen or a rook (#1)

- E can't be a queen or a rook (#2)

- F can't be a knight (#1)

- 2 can't be a queen or a rook (#1)

- 4 can't be a bishop or a queen (#2)

- 6 can't be a bishop or a pawn (#1)

- 7 can't be a knight (#1)




Pawns can't be




on the 1st/8th rank, so A, B and 7 can't be pawns.




In #1 the mating move looks like




Qh6 by A=queen, protected by B=knight.




So the white pieces are




A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, with E and F being a bishop or a pawn.




Substituting the known pieces in #2,




Having F be a pawn would make it possible to mate with f8=Q, with all escape squares covered by white pieces.




Now we just give the black pieces some combination which makes the #2 position a checkmate after that move.




1 pawn, 2 bishop, 3 king, 4 pawn, 5 queen, 6 knight, 7 rook.

A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, E bishop, F pawn.




The boards with all pieces:




enter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here







share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    I spent the last two hours typing out in paragraph form all of this. You beat me to it though by 7 minutes. Nice work.
    – Arpeyji
    24 mins ago










  • Good job! Some logic questions: On your first step, couldn't it be possible for 4 to be a knight? Also, on your second step, white could possibly be in check as long as they removed the threat on the mate, right?
    – Jo.
    13 mins ago










  • @Jo. Hmm that's true, good points. I had thought about 4 being a knight, then disregarded it when I thought C was the white king, and forgot to add the possibility back. The second point hadn't occurred to me at all :P
    – jafe
    8 mins ago












up vote
3
down vote



accepted







up vote
3
down vote



accepted






The #3 looks like a




back rank mate, so 3 is the black king. C is missing from #2, so that can't be the king, which means that the white pieces in #3 are D=king and C=queen/rook. The only way the position is a mate in 1 is if 4 is a pawn and 7 is a rook.




The pieces in #1 and #2




can't be attacking the opposing king, so

- B can't be a queen or a rook (#1)

- E can't be a queen or a rook (#2)

- F can't be a knight (#1)

- 2 can't be a queen or a rook (#1)

- 4 can't be a bishop or a queen (#2)

- 6 can't be a bishop or a pawn (#1)

- 7 can't be a knight (#1)




Pawns can't be




on the 1st/8th rank, so A, B and 7 can't be pawns.




In #1 the mating move looks like




Qh6 by A=queen, protected by B=knight.




So the white pieces are




A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, with E and F being a bishop or a pawn.




Substituting the known pieces in #2,




Having F be a pawn would make it possible to mate with f8=Q, with all escape squares covered by white pieces.




Now we just give the black pieces some combination which makes the #2 position a checkmate after that move.




1 pawn, 2 bishop, 3 king, 4 pawn, 5 queen, 6 knight, 7 rook.

A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, E bishop, F pawn.




The boards with all pieces:




enter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here







share|improve this answer














The #3 looks like a




back rank mate, so 3 is the black king. C is missing from #2, so that can't be the king, which means that the white pieces in #3 are D=king and C=queen/rook. The only way the position is a mate in 1 is if 4 is a pawn and 7 is a rook.




The pieces in #1 and #2




can't be attacking the opposing king, so

- B can't be a queen or a rook (#1)

- E can't be a queen or a rook (#2)

- F can't be a knight (#1)

- 2 can't be a queen or a rook (#1)

- 4 can't be a bishop or a queen (#2)

- 6 can't be a bishop or a pawn (#1)

- 7 can't be a knight (#1)




Pawns can't be




on the 1st/8th rank, so A, B and 7 can't be pawns.




In #1 the mating move looks like




Qh6 by A=queen, protected by B=knight.




So the white pieces are




A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, with E and F being a bishop or a pawn.




Substituting the known pieces in #2,




Having F be a pawn would make it possible to mate with f8=Q, with all escape squares covered by white pieces.




Now we just give the black pieces some combination which makes the #2 position a checkmate after that move.




1 pawn, 2 bishop, 3 king, 4 pawn, 5 queen, 6 knight, 7 rook.

A queen, B knight, C rook, D king, E bishop, F pawn.




The boards with all pieces:




enter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 18 mins ago

























answered 35 mins ago









jafe

9,19819102




9,19819102







  • 1




    I spent the last two hours typing out in paragraph form all of this. You beat me to it though by 7 minutes. Nice work.
    – Arpeyji
    24 mins ago










  • Good job! Some logic questions: On your first step, couldn't it be possible for 4 to be a knight? Also, on your second step, white could possibly be in check as long as they removed the threat on the mate, right?
    – Jo.
    13 mins ago










  • @Jo. Hmm that's true, good points. I had thought about 4 being a knight, then disregarded it when I thought C was the white king, and forgot to add the possibility back. The second point hadn't occurred to me at all :P
    – jafe
    8 mins ago












  • 1




    I spent the last two hours typing out in paragraph form all of this. You beat me to it though by 7 minutes. Nice work.
    – Arpeyji
    24 mins ago










  • Good job! Some logic questions: On your first step, couldn't it be possible for 4 to be a knight? Also, on your second step, white could possibly be in check as long as they removed the threat on the mate, right?
    – Jo.
    13 mins ago










  • @Jo. Hmm that's true, good points. I had thought about 4 being a knight, then disregarded it when I thought C was the white king, and forgot to add the possibility back. The second point hadn't occurred to me at all :P
    – jafe
    8 mins ago







1




1




I spent the last two hours typing out in paragraph form all of this. You beat me to it though by 7 minutes. Nice work.
– Arpeyji
24 mins ago




I spent the last two hours typing out in paragraph form all of this. You beat me to it though by 7 minutes. Nice work.
– Arpeyji
24 mins ago












Good job! Some logic questions: On your first step, couldn't it be possible for 4 to be a knight? Also, on your second step, white could possibly be in check as long as they removed the threat on the mate, right?
– Jo.
13 mins ago




Good job! Some logic questions: On your first step, couldn't it be possible for 4 to be a knight? Also, on your second step, white could possibly be in check as long as they removed the threat on the mate, right?
– Jo.
13 mins ago












@Jo. Hmm that's true, good points. I had thought about 4 being a knight, then disregarded it when I thought C was the white king, and forgot to add the possibility back. The second point hadn't occurred to me at all :P
– jafe
8 mins ago




@Jo. Hmm that's true, good points. I had thought about 4 being a knight, then disregarded it when I thought C was the white king, and forgot to add the possibility back. The second point hadn't occurred to me at all :P
– jafe
8 mins ago

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f74323%2fmate-in-one-with-no-pieces%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What does second last employer means? [closed]

List of Gilmore Girls characters

Confectionery