A sequence defined inductively.
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $a_n$ be a sequence such that $a_1=1$ and $$a_n+1=a_n+frac1a_n^2.$$ Prove that $a_n$ is unbounded. Any hint?
sequences-and-series
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $a_n$ be a sequence such that $a_1=1$ and $$a_n+1=a_n+frac1a_n^2.$$ Prove that $a_n$ is unbounded. Any hint?
sequences-and-series
1
What have you tried? Have you considered the opposite and supposed that there exists $L$ such that $L:=lim_ntoinftya_n$? What happens then?
â TheSimpliFire
22 mins ago
1
@TheSimpliFire I thought that the sequence is positive and monotone, so if I assume it's bounded, then it will be convergent. But I don't know how to get a contradiction from that.
â bateman
19 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $a_n$ be a sequence such that $a_1=1$ and $$a_n+1=a_n+frac1a_n^2.$$ Prove that $a_n$ is unbounded. Any hint?
sequences-and-series
Let $a_n$ be a sequence such that $a_1=1$ and $$a_n+1=a_n+frac1a_n^2.$$ Prove that $a_n$ is unbounded. Any hint?
sequences-and-series
sequences-and-series
edited 18 mins ago
asked 24 mins ago
bateman
1,817919
1,817919
1
What have you tried? Have you considered the opposite and supposed that there exists $L$ such that $L:=lim_ntoinftya_n$? What happens then?
â TheSimpliFire
22 mins ago
1
@TheSimpliFire I thought that the sequence is positive and monotone, so if I assume it's bounded, then it will be convergent. But I don't know how to get a contradiction from that.
â bateman
19 mins ago
add a comment |Â
1
What have you tried? Have you considered the opposite and supposed that there exists $L$ such that $L:=lim_ntoinftya_n$? What happens then?
â TheSimpliFire
22 mins ago
1
@TheSimpliFire I thought that the sequence is positive and monotone, so if I assume it's bounded, then it will be convergent. But I don't know how to get a contradiction from that.
â bateman
19 mins ago
1
1
What have you tried? Have you considered the opposite and supposed that there exists $L$ such that $L:=lim_ntoinftya_n$? What happens then?
â TheSimpliFire
22 mins ago
What have you tried? Have you considered the opposite and supposed that there exists $L$ such that $L:=lim_ntoinftya_n$? What happens then?
â TheSimpliFire
22 mins ago
1
1
@TheSimpliFire I thought that the sequence is positive and monotone, so if I assume it's bounded, then it will be convergent. But I don't know how to get a contradiction from that.
â bateman
19 mins ago
@TheSimpliFire I thought that the sequence is positive and monotone, so if I assume it's bounded, then it will be convergent. But I don't know how to get a contradiction from that.
â bateman
19 mins ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Suppose it is bounded then the limit exists since it is a strictly increasing sequence.So $L = L + 1/L^2$ . This shows $L = infty$ contradiction to it being bounded.
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Suppose it is bounded then the limit exists since it is a strictly increasing sequence.So $L = L + 1/L^2$ . This shows $L = infty$ contradiction to it being bounded.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Suppose it is bounded then the limit exists since it is a strictly increasing sequence.So $L = L + 1/L^2$ . This shows $L = infty$ contradiction to it being bounded.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Suppose it is bounded then the limit exists since it is a strictly increasing sequence.So $L = L + 1/L^2$ . This shows $L = infty$ contradiction to it being bounded.
Suppose it is bounded then the limit exists since it is a strictly increasing sequence.So $L = L + 1/L^2$ . This shows $L = infty$ contradiction to it being bounded.
edited 13 mins ago
answered 17 mins ago
DeepSea
69.6k54285
69.6k54285
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2943055%2fa-sequence-defined-inductively%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
What have you tried? Have you considered the opposite and supposed that there exists $L$ such that $L:=lim_ntoinftya_n$? What happens then?
â TheSimpliFire
22 mins ago
1
@TheSimpliFire I thought that the sequence is positive and monotone, so if I assume it's bounded, then it will be convergent. But I don't know how to get a contradiction from that.
â bateman
19 mins ago