A sequence defined inductively.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Let $a_n$ be a sequence such that $a_1=1$ and $$a_n+1=a_n+frac1a_n^2.$$ Prove that $a_n$ is unbounded. Any hint?










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    What have you tried? Have you considered the opposite and supposed that there exists $L$ such that $L:=lim_ntoinftya_n$? What happens then?
    – TheSimpliFire
    22 mins ago







  • 1




    @TheSimpliFire I thought that the sequence is positive and monotone, so if I assume it's bounded, then it will be convergent. But I don't know how to get a contradiction from that.
    – bateman
    19 mins ago














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Let $a_n$ be a sequence such that $a_1=1$ and $$a_n+1=a_n+frac1a_n^2.$$ Prove that $a_n$ is unbounded. Any hint?










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    What have you tried? Have you considered the opposite and supposed that there exists $L$ such that $L:=lim_ntoinftya_n$? What happens then?
    – TheSimpliFire
    22 mins ago







  • 1




    @TheSimpliFire I thought that the sequence is positive and monotone, so if I assume it's bounded, then it will be convergent. But I don't know how to get a contradiction from that.
    – bateman
    19 mins ago












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











Let $a_n$ be a sequence such that $a_1=1$ and $$a_n+1=a_n+frac1a_n^2.$$ Prove that $a_n$ is unbounded. Any hint?










share|cite|improve this question















Let $a_n$ be a sequence such that $a_1=1$ and $$a_n+1=a_n+frac1a_n^2.$$ Prove that $a_n$ is unbounded. Any hint?







sequences-and-series






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 18 mins ago

























asked 24 mins ago









bateman

1,817919




1,817919







  • 1




    What have you tried? Have you considered the opposite and supposed that there exists $L$ such that $L:=lim_ntoinftya_n$? What happens then?
    – TheSimpliFire
    22 mins ago







  • 1




    @TheSimpliFire I thought that the sequence is positive and monotone, so if I assume it's bounded, then it will be convergent. But I don't know how to get a contradiction from that.
    – bateman
    19 mins ago












  • 1




    What have you tried? Have you considered the opposite and supposed that there exists $L$ such that $L:=lim_ntoinftya_n$? What happens then?
    – TheSimpliFire
    22 mins ago







  • 1




    @TheSimpliFire I thought that the sequence is positive and monotone, so if I assume it's bounded, then it will be convergent. But I don't know how to get a contradiction from that.
    – bateman
    19 mins ago







1




1




What have you tried? Have you considered the opposite and supposed that there exists $L$ such that $L:=lim_ntoinftya_n$? What happens then?
– TheSimpliFire
22 mins ago





What have you tried? Have you considered the opposite and supposed that there exists $L$ such that $L:=lim_ntoinftya_n$? What happens then?
– TheSimpliFire
22 mins ago





1




1




@TheSimpliFire I thought that the sequence is positive and monotone, so if I assume it's bounded, then it will be convergent. But I don't know how to get a contradiction from that.
– bateman
19 mins ago




@TheSimpliFire I thought that the sequence is positive and monotone, so if I assume it's bounded, then it will be convergent. But I don't know how to get a contradiction from that.
– bateman
19 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










Suppose it is bounded then the limit exists since it is a strictly increasing sequence.So $L = L + 1/L^2$ . This shows $L = infty$ contradiction to it being bounded.






share|cite|improve this answer






















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2943055%2fa-sequence-defined-inductively%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    4
    down vote



    accepted










    Suppose it is bounded then the limit exists since it is a strictly increasing sequence.So $L = L + 1/L^2$ . This shows $L = infty$ contradiction to it being bounded.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      up vote
      4
      down vote



      accepted










      Suppose it is bounded then the limit exists since it is a strictly increasing sequence.So $L = L + 1/L^2$ . This shows $L = infty$ contradiction to it being bounded.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted






        Suppose it is bounded then the limit exists since it is a strictly increasing sequence.So $L = L + 1/L^2$ . This shows $L = infty$ contradiction to it being bounded.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Suppose it is bounded then the limit exists since it is a strictly increasing sequence.So $L = L + 1/L^2$ . This shows $L = infty$ contradiction to it being bounded.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 13 mins ago

























        answered 17 mins ago









        DeepSea

        69.6k54285




        69.6k54285



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2943055%2fa-sequence-defined-inductively%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What does second last employer means? [closed]

            Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

            One-line joke