Unexpected results from voltage mulitplier

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I needed a high voltage (500VDC) source in order to test a circuit. To achieve this, my mentor instructed me to build a voltage doubler, which I would power with 250VAC. I chose to use a simple half-wave rectifier as shown below.



enter image description here



The diodes are 1N4007's. The only high-voltage capacitors available were 2.2nF 2KV non-polarised caps. 2.2nF is not much, but I don't have any other options here. I built it in the formation above, with the nodes a few centimeters apart.



When it came to testing, however, the results were not what I was expecting. I put 29VAC on the input, but got only 35VDC out. I did some testing, and this is what I found:enter image description here



I then built a quadrupler in order to do some more testing, and this is what I got:enter image description here



Much surprised, my mentor and I did an LTspice simulation of the circuits, which behaved as originally expected. Here are the screenshots:
enter image description here



As you can see, I am testing voltage at the input and output.



enter image description here



Why didn't my circuits work?



I understand that SPICE models use ideal components, but even so, why does the simulation differ so much from what I have in real life?










share|improve this question

















  • 2




    What is not in your simulation is the 10 Mohm impedance of your multimeter. Is it relevant? Calculate the impedance of a 2.2 nF capacitor at 60 Hz and see what you get.
    – Bimpelrekkie
    2 hours ago










  • I didn't think of that. 2.2nF @ 60Hz is 1.2Mohm. How does the fact that it is half-wave DC across most of the caps change things?
    – Jǝssǝ
    1 hour ago










  • @Bimpelrekkie, I added that to the simulation, and it behaved in a very similar way to my measurements. It seems that you have given me the answer, thanks! If you would like to write out a full answer, I'd be happy to accept it.
    – Jǝssǝ
    1 hour ago










  • 1.2 Mohm is for a pure sinewave. If you're asking about the impedance of a half-wave sine then that's too broad to answer here. That would involve haronics and spectral analysis, there is no easy answer. But add the multimeter resistance in the simulation and see what happens.
    – Bimpelrekkie
    1 hour ago














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I needed a high voltage (500VDC) source in order to test a circuit. To achieve this, my mentor instructed me to build a voltage doubler, which I would power with 250VAC. I chose to use a simple half-wave rectifier as shown below.



enter image description here



The diodes are 1N4007's. The only high-voltage capacitors available were 2.2nF 2KV non-polarised caps. 2.2nF is not much, but I don't have any other options here. I built it in the formation above, with the nodes a few centimeters apart.



When it came to testing, however, the results were not what I was expecting. I put 29VAC on the input, but got only 35VDC out. I did some testing, and this is what I found:enter image description here



I then built a quadrupler in order to do some more testing, and this is what I got:enter image description here



Much surprised, my mentor and I did an LTspice simulation of the circuits, which behaved as originally expected. Here are the screenshots:
enter image description here



As you can see, I am testing voltage at the input and output.



enter image description here



Why didn't my circuits work?



I understand that SPICE models use ideal components, but even so, why does the simulation differ so much from what I have in real life?










share|improve this question

















  • 2




    What is not in your simulation is the 10 Mohm impedance of your multimeter. Is it relevant? Calculate the impedance of a 2.2 nF capacitor at 60 Hz and see what you get.
    – Bimpelrekkie
    2 hours ago










  • I didn't think of that. 2.2nF @ 60Hz is 1.2Mohm. How does the fact that it is half-wave DC across most of the caps change things?
    – Jǝssǝ
    1 hour ago










  • @Bimpelrekkie, I added that to the simulation, and it behaved in a very similar way to my measurements. It seems that you have given me the answer, thanks! If you would like to write out a full answer, I'd be happy to accept it.
    – Jǝssǝ
    1 hour ago










  • 1.2 Mohm is for a pure sinewave. If you're asking about the impedance of a half-wave sine then that's too broad to answer here. That would involve haronics and spectral analysis, there is no easy answer. But add the multimeter resistance in the simulation and see what happens.
    – Bimpelrekkie
    1 hour ago












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I needed a high voltage (500VDC) source in order to test a circuit. To achieve this, my mentor instructed me to build a voltage doubler, which I would power with 250VAC. I chose to use a simple half-wave rectifier as shown below.



enter image description here



The diodes are 1N4007's. The only high-voltage capacitors available were 2.2nF 2KV non-polarised caps. 2.2nF is not much, but I don't have any other options here. I built it in the formation above, with the nodes a few centimeters apart.



When it came to testing, however, the results were not what I was expecting. I put 29VAC on the input, but got only 35VDC out. I did some testing, and this is what I found:enter image description here



I then built a quadrupler in order to do some more testing, and this is what I got:enter image description here



Much surprised, my mentor and I did an LTspice simulation of the circuits, which behaved as originally expected. Here are the screenshots:
enter image description here



As you can see, I am testing voltage at the input and output.



enter image description here



Why didn't my circuits work?



I understand that SPICE models use ideal components, but even so, why does the simulation differ so much from what I have in real life?










share|improve this question













I needed a high voltage (500VDC) source in order to test a circuit. To achieve this, my mentor instructed me to build a voltage doubler, which I would power with 250VAC. I chose to use a simple half-wave rectifier as shown below.



enter image description here



The diodes are 1N4007's. The only high-voltage capacitors available were 2.2nF 2KV non-polarised caps. 2.2nF is not much, but I don't have any other options here. I built it in the formation above, with the nodes a few centimeters apart.



When it came to testing, however, the results were not what I was expecting. I put 29VAC on the input, but got only 35VDC out. I did some testing, and this is what I found:enter image description here



I then built a quadrupler in order to do some more testing, and this is what I got:enter image description here



Much surprised, my mentor and I did an LTspice simulation of the circuits, which behaved as originally expected. Here are the screenshots:
enter image description here



As you can see, I am testing voltage at the input and output.



enter image description here



Why didn't my circuits work?



I understand that SPICE models use ideal components, but even so, why does the simulation differ so much from what I have in real life?







voltage-doubler






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









Jǝssǝ

1559




1559







  • 2




    What is not in your simulation is the 10 Mohm impedance of your multimeter. Is it relevant? Calculate the impedance of a 2.2 nF capacitor at 60 Hz and see what you get.
    – Bimpelrekkie
    2 hours ago










  • I didn't think of that. 2.2nF @ 60Hz is 1.2Mohm. How does the fact that it is half-wave DC across most of the caps change things?
    – Jǝssǝ
    1 hour ago










  • @Bimpelrekkie, I added that to the simulation, and it behaved in a very similar way to my measurements. It seems that you have given me the answer, thanks! If you would like to write out a full answer, I'd be happy to accept it.
    – Jǝssǝ
    1 hour ago










  • 1.2 Mohm is for a pure sinewave. If you're asking about the impedance of a half-wave sine then that's too broad to answer here. That would involve haronics and spectral analysis, there is no easy answer. But add the multimeter resistance in the simulation and see what happens.
    – Bimpelrekkie
    1 hour ago












  • 2




    What is not in your simulation is the 10 Mohm impedance of your multimeter. Is it relevant? Calculate the impedance of a 2.2 nF capacitor at 60 Hz and see what you get.
    – Bimpelrekkie
    2 hours ago










  • I didn't think of that. 2.2nF @ 60Hz is 1.2Mohm. How does the fact that it is half-wave DC across most of the caps change things?
    – Jǝssǝ
    1 hour ago










  • @Bimpelrekkie, I added that to the simulation, and it behaved in a very similar way to my measurements. It seems that you have given me the answer, thanks! If you would like to write out a full answer, I'd be happy to accept it.
    – Jǝssǝ
    1 hour ago










  • 1.2 Mohm is for a pure sinewave. If you're asking about the impedance of a half-wave sine then that's too broad to answer here. That would involve haronics and spectral analysis, there is no easy answer. But add the multimeter resistance in the simulation and see what happens.
    – Bimpelrekkie
    1 hour ago







2




2




What is not in your simulation is the 10 Mohm impedance of your multimeter. Is it relevant? Calculate the impedance of a 2.2 nF capacitor at 60 Hz and see what you get.
– Bimpelrekkie
2 hours ago




What is not in your simulation is the 10 Mohm impedance of your multimeter. Is it relevant? Calculate the impedance of a 2.2 nF capacitor at 60 Hz and see what you get.
– Bimpelrekkie
2 hours ago












I didn't think of that. 2.2nF @ 60Hz is 1.2Mohm. How does the fact that it is half-wave DC across most of the caps change things?
– Jǝssǝ
1 hour ago




I didn't think of that. 2.2nF @ 60Hz is 1.2Mohm. How does the fact that it is half-wave DC across most of the caps change things?
– Jǝssǝ
1 hour ago












@Bimpelrekkie, I added that to the simulation, and it behaved in a very similar way to my measurements. It seems that you have given me the answer, thanks! If you would like to write out a full answer, I'd be happy to accept it.
– Jǝssǝ
1 hour ago




@Bimpelrekkie, I added that to the simulation, and it behaved in a very similar way to my measurements. It seems that you have given me the answer, thanks! If you would like to write out a full answer, I'd be happy to accept it.
– Jǝssǝ
1 hour ago












1.2 Mohm is for a pure sinewave. If you're asking about the impedance of a half-wave sine then that's too broad to answer here. That would involve haronics and spectral analysis, there is no easy answer. But add the multimeter resistance in the simulation and see what happens.
– Bimpelrekkie
1 hour ago




1.2 Mohm is for a pure sinewave. If you're asking about the impedance of a half-wave sine then that's too broad to answer here. That would involve haronics and spectral analysis, there is no easy answer. But add the multimeter resistance in the simulation and see what happens.
– Bimpelrekkie
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










What is not in your simulation is the 10 Mohm impedance of your multimeter.



But 10 Mohm is quite a high resistance, so is it relevant?



Calculate the impedance of a 2.2 nF capacitor at 60 Hz and notice how it is about 1.2 Mohm, that's quite relevant compared to 10 Mohm. Also the capacitors are more or less in series.






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    );
    , "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f399320%2funexpected-results-from-voltage-mulitplier%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    4
    down vote



    accepted










    What is not in your simulation is the 10 Mohm impedance of your multimeter.



    But 10 Mohm is quite a high resistance, so is it relevant?



    Calculate the impedance of a 2.2 nF capacitor at 60 Hz and notice how it is about 1.2 Mohm, that's quite relevant compared to 10 Mohm. Also the capacitors are more or less in series.






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      4
      down vote



      accepted










      What is not in your simulation is the 10 Mohm impedance of your multimeter.



      But 10 Mohm is quite a high resistance, so is it relevant?



      Calculate the impedance of a 2.2 nF capacitor at 60 Hz and notice how it is about 1.2 Mohm, that's quite relevant compared to 10 Mohm. Also the capacitors are more or less in series.






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted






        What is not in your simulation is the 10 Mohm impedance of your multimeter.



        But 10 Mohm is quite a high resistance, so is it relevant?



        Calculate the impedance of a 2.2 nF capacitor at 60 Hz and notice how it is about 1.2 Mohm, that's quite relevant compared to 10 Mohm. Also the capacitors are more or less in series.






        share|improve this answer














        What is not in your simulation is the 10 Mohm impedance of your multimeter.



        But 10 Mohm is quite a high resistance, so is it relevant?



        Calculate the impedance of a 2.2 nF capacitor at 60 Hz and notice how it is about 1.2 Mohm, that's quite relevant compared to 10 Mohm. Also the capacitors are more or less in series.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 1 hour ago

























        answered 1 hour ago









        Bimpelrekkie

        43.3k23895




        43.3k23895



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f399320%2funexpected-results-from-voltage-mulitplier%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

            Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

            Confectionery