A circled inequality relation symbol similar to the circled arithmetic operators
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I'm looking for a variation on the odot
(a circled dot) and oplus
(a circled plus) operators, but for the inequality relations. In other words, I'm looking for the symbol to substitute for the blank in the second printed line of following example.
documentclassamsart
begindocument
beginalign*
ccdot x + y &leq z\
codot xoplus y &quad z
endalign*
enddocument
I couldn't find any matching symbol using detexify.
symbols
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I'm looking for a variation on the odot
(a circled dot) and oplus
(a circled plus) operators, but for the inequality relations. In other words, I'm looking for the symbol to substitute for the blank in the second printed line of following example.
documentclassamsart
begindocument
beginalign*
ccdot x + y &leq z\
codot xoplus y &quad z
endalign*
enddocument
I couldn't find any matching symbol using detexify.
symbols
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I'm looking for a variation on the odot
(a circled dot) and oplus
(a circled plus) operators, but for the inequality relations. In other words, I'm looking for the symbol to substitute for the blank in the second printed line of following example.
documentclassamsart
begindocument
beginalign*
ccdot x + y &leq z\
codot xoplus y &quad z
endalign*
enddocument
I couldn't find any matching symbol using detexify.
symbols
I'm looking for a variation on the odot
(a circled dot) and oplus
(a circled plus) operators, but for the inequality relations. In other words, I'm looking for the symbol to substitute for the blank in the second printed line of following example.
documentclassamsart
begindocument
beginalign*
ccdot x + y &leq z\
codot xoplus y &quad z
endalign*
enddocument
I couldn't find any matching symbol using detexify.
symbols
symbols
edited 4 hours ago
asked 4 hours ago
Evan Aad
3,55111327
3,55111327
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
To answer your question in your last comment, here is an easy way with pstricks
. However I'm not sure scaling will look so nice, as the circled symbols won't be aligned with the other symbols. Anyway, I show in the following code some possible variants:
documentclassamsart
usepackageamssymb
usepackagepstricks, auto-pst-pdf
begindocument
beginalign*
ccdot x + y &leq z\
codot xoplus y &mathrelpscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leq z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslant z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslantmkern2mu z
endalign*
beginalign*
ccdot x + y &leq z\
codot xoplus y &mathrelpsscalebox0.67pscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leq z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpsscalebox0.67pscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslant z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpsscalebox0.67pscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslantmkern2mu z
endalign*
enddocument
Thanks! I like the last one most of all.
– Evan Aad
12 mins ago
By the way, if I wish to have ageq
variant of the last version, what do I need to do besides changingleqslant
togeqslant
so that it looks as well positioned inside the circle as theleq
version?
– Evan Aad
2 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
You can certainly do this in many ways, one of them is TikZ. Loading TikZ only for that may be a bit of an overkill, but if you want to construct more symbols of this sort, this might be one of the easiest ways to go.
documentclassamsart
usepackagetikz
begindocument
beginalign*
ccdot x + y &leq z\
codot xoplus y &tikz[baseline=(X.base)]node[circle,draw,inner
sep=1pt](X)$leq$; z
endalign*
enddocument
1
Thanks. I think to achieve best aesthetics, the circle should be the same size as the ones about the arithmetic operators, which means the inequality symbol needs to be shrunk a little. How can I achieve this? Also, how can I make this symbol behave like a binary relation in terms of the spaces surrounding it?
– Evan Aad
3 hours ago
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
To answer your question in your last comment, here is an easy way with pstricks
. However I'm not sure scaling will look so nice, as the circled symbols won't be aligned with the other symbols. Anyway, I show in the following code some possible variants:
documentclassamsart
usepackageamssymb
usepackagepstricks, auto-pst-pdf
begindocument
beginalign*
ccdot x + y &leq z\
codot xoplus y &mathrelpscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leq z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslant z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslantmkern2mu z
endalign*
beginalign*
ccdot x + y &leq z\
codot xoplus y &mathrelpsscalebox0.67pscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leq z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpsscalebox0.67pscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslant z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpsscalebox0.67pscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslantmkern2mu z
endalign*
enddocument
Thanks! I like the last one most of all.
– Evan Aad
12 mins ago
By the way, if I wish to have ageq
variant of the last version, what do I need to do besides changingleqslant
togeqslant
so that it looks as well positioned inside the circle as theleq
version?
– Evan Aad
2 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
To answer your question in your last comment, here is an easy way with pstricks
. However I'm not sure scaling will look so nice, as the circled symbols won't be aligned with the other symbols. Anyway, I show in the following code some possible variants:
documentclassamsart
usepackageamssymb
usepackagepstricks, auto-pst-pdf
begindocument
beginalign*
ccdot x + y &leq z\
codot xoplus y &mathrelpscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leq z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslant z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslantmkern2mu z
endalign*
beginalign*
ccdot x + y &leq z\
codot xoplus y &mathrelpsscalebox0.67pscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leq z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpsscalebox0.67pscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslant z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpsscalebox0.67pscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslantmkern2mu z
endalign*
enddocument
Thanks! I like the last one most of all.
– Evan Aad
12 mins ago
By the way, if I wish to have ageq
variant of the last version, what do I need to do besides changingleqslant
togeqslant
so that it looks as well positioned inside the circle as theleq
version?
– Evan Aad
2 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
To answer your question in your last comment, here is an easy way with pstricks
. However I'm not sure scaling will look so nice, as the circled symbols won't be aligned with the other symbols. Anyway, I show in the following code some possible variants:
documentclassamsart
usepackageamssymb
usepackagepstricks, auto-pst-pdf
begindocument
beginalign*
ccdot x + y &leq z\
codot xoplus y &mathrelpscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leq z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslant z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslantmkern2mu z
endalign*
beginalign*
ccdot x + y &leq z\
codot xoplus y &mathrelpsscalebox0.67pscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leq z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpsscalebox0.67pscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslant z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpsscalebox0.67pscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslantmkern2mu z
endalign*
enddocument
To answer your question in your last comment, here is an easy way with pstricks
. However I'm not sure scaling will look so nice, as the circled symbols won't be aligned with the other symbols. Anyway, I show in the following code some possible variants:
documentclassamsart
usepackageamssymb
usepackagepstricks, auto-pst-pdf
begindocument
beginalign*
ccdot x + y &leq z\
codot xoplus y &mathrelpscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leq z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslant z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslantmkern2mu z
endalign*
beginalign*
ccdot x + y &leq z\
codot xoplus y &mathrelpsscalebox0.67pscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leq z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpsscalebox0.67pscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslant z \
codot xoplus y &mathrelpsscalebox0.67pscirclebox[framesep=-0.7pt, linewidth=0.4pt]leqslantmkern2mu z
endalign*
enddocument
answered 54 mins ago
Bernard
161k766192
161k766192
Thanks! I like the last one most of all.
– Evan Aad
12 mins ago
By the way, if I wish to have ageq
variant of the last version, what do I need to do besides changingleqslant
togeqslant
so that it looks as well positioned inside the circle as theleq
version?
– Evan Aad
2 mins ago
add a comment |Â
Thanks! I like the last one most of all.
– Evan Aad
12 mins ago
By the way, if I wish to have ageq
variant of the last version, what do I need to do besides changingleqslant
togeqslant
so that it looks as well positioned inside the circle as theleq
version?
– Evan Aad
2 mins ago
Thanks! I like the last one most of all.
– Evan Aad
12 mins ago
Thanks! I like the last one most of all.
– Evan Aad
12 mins ago
By the way, if I wish to have a
geq
variant of the last version, what do I need to do besides changing leqslant
to geqslant
so that it looks as well positioned inside the circle as the leq
version?– Evan Aad
2 mins ago
By the way, if I wish to have a
geq
variant of the last version, what do I need to do besides changing leqslant
to geqslant
so that it looks as well positioned inside the circle as the leq
version?– Evan Aad
2 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
You can certainly do this in many ways, one of them is TikZ. Loading TikZ only for that may be a bit of an overkill, but if you want to construct more symbols of this sort, this might be one of the easiest ways to go.
documentclassamsart
usepackagetikz
begindocument
beginalign*
ccdot x + y &leq z\
codot xoplus y &tikz[baseline=(X.base)]node[circle,draw,inner
sep=1pt](X)$leq$; z
endalign*
enddocument
1
Thanks. I think to achieve best aesthetics, the circle should be the same size as the ones about the arithmetic operators, which means the inequality symbol needs to be shrunk a little. How can I achieve this? Also, how can I make this symbol behave like a binary relation in terms of the spaces surrounding it?
– Evan Aad
3 hours ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
You can certainly do this in many ways, one of them is TikZ. Loading TikZ only for that may be a bit of an overkill, but if you want to construct more symbols of this sort, this might be one of the easiest ways to go.
documentclassamsart
usepackagetikz
begindocument
beginalign*
ccdot x + y &leq z\
codot xoplus y &tikz[baseline=(X.base)]node[circle,draw,inner
sep=1pt](X)$leq$; z
endalign*
enddocument
1
Thanks. I think to achieve best aesthetics, the circle should be the same size as the ones about the arithmetic operators, which means the inequality symbol needs to be shrunk a little. How can I achieve this? Also, how can I make this symbol behave like a binary relation in terms of the spaces surrounding it?
– Evan Aad
3 hours ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
You can certainly do this in many ways, one of them is TikZ. Loading TikZ only for that may be a bit of an overkill, but if you want to construct more symbols of this sort, this might be one of the easiest ways to go.
documentclassamsart
usepackagetikz
begindocument
beginalign*
ccdot x + y &leq z\
codot xoplus y &tikz[baseline=(X.base)]node[circle,draw,inner
sep=1pt](X)$leq$; z
endalign*
enddocument
You can certainly do this in many ways, one of them is TikZ. Loading TikZ only for that may be a bit of an overkill, but if you want to construct more symbols of this sort, this might be one of the easiest ways to go.
documentclassamsart
usepackagetikz
begindocument
beginalign*
ccdot x + y &leq z\
codot xoplus y &tikz[baseline=(X.base)]node[circle,draw,inner
sep=1pt](X)$leq$; z
endalign*
enddocument
answered 4 hours ago


marmot
72.6k477153
72.6k477153
1
Thanks. I think to achieve best aesthetics, the circle should be the same size as the ones about the arithmetic operators, which means the inequality symbol needs to be shrunk a little. How can I achieve this? Also, how can I make this symbol behave like a binary relation in terms of the spaces surrounding it?
– Evan Aad
3 hours ago
add a comment |Â
1
Thanks. I think to achieve best aesthetics, the circle should be the same size as the ones about the arithmetic operators, which means the inequality symbol needs to be shrunk a little. How can I achieve this? Also, how can I make this symbol behave like a binary relation in terms of the spaces surrounding it?
– Evan Aad
3 hours ago
1
1
Thanks. I think to achieve best aesthetics, the circle should be the same size as the ones about the arithmetic operators, which means the inequality symbol needs to be shrunk a little. How can I achieve this? Also, how can I make this symbol behave like a binary relation in terms of the spaces surrounding it?
– Evan Aad
3 hours ago
Thanks. I think to achieve best aesthetics, the circle should be the same size as the ones about the arithmetic operators, which means the inequality symbol needs to be shrunk a little. How can I achieve this? Also, how can I make this symbol behave like a binary relation in terms of the spaces surrounding it?
– Evan Aad
3 hours ago
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f458913%2fa-circled-inequality-relation-symbol-similar-to-the-circled-arithmetic-operators%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password