Has Dr. Christine Blasey Ford written over 65 peer-reviewed articles?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
During the Senate confirmation hearings for Brett Kavanaugh on September 27, 2018, Senator Feinstein said in her introduction, to, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford:
You are a professor affiliated with both Stanford University and Palo Alto University. You have published over 65 peer-reviewed articles and have received numerous awards for your work and research.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/national/wp/2018/09/27/kavanaugh-hearing-transcript/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.0a7f36e037a0
But by my count, there is only one peer-reviewed article by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford: Use of the Pediatric Symptom Checklist in a Low-Income, Mexican American Population, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(12):1169-1176. doi:10.1001/archpedi.157.12.1169
Why doesn't Google Scholar reveal more articles by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford?
UPDATE: A search for articles by Christine Blasey reveals many more articles. Done!
united-states politics
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
During the Senate confirmation hearings for Brett Kavanaugh on September 27, 2018, Senator Feinstein said in her introduction, to, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford:
You are a professor affiliated with both Stanford University and Palo Alto University. You have published over 65 peer-reviewed articles and have received numerous awards for your work and research.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/national/wp/2018/09/27/kavanaugh-hearing-transcript/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.0a7f36e037a0
But by my count, there is only one peer-reviewed article by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford: Use of the Pediatric Symptom Checklist in a Low-Income, Mexican American Population, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(12):1169-1176. doi:10.1001/archpedi.157.12.1169
Why doesn't Google Scholar reveal more articles by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford?
UPDATE: A search for articles by Christine Blasey reveals many more articles. Done!
united-states politics
2
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's dumb.
â elliot svensson
1 hour ago
2
I think this question is actually quite reasonable and on-topic. You have a clear and sourced claim, as well as a legitimate reason for some doubt on the claim. There is some room for improvement on both the question and the answer, but to me this fits the purpose and format of Sketpics.SE just fine.
â Kamil Drakari
1 hour ago
1
@elliotsvensson it's your question, right? you can delete if you want.
â DavePhD
1 hour ago
Darn it, I didn't notice that. Meh!
â elliot svensson
1 hour ago
Leave it out there, please do not delete. People may question her track record, and there will definitely people who will make the claim that people are lying about and inflating her record based on the same kind of initial search that you did. Your update and answer provide insight.
â PoloHoleSet
28 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
During the Senate confirmation hearings for Brett Kavanaugh on September 27, 2018, Senator Feinstein said in her introduction, to, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford:
You are a professor affiliated with both Stanford University and Palo Alto University. You have published over 65 peer-reviewed articles and have received numerous awards for your work and research.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/national/wp/2018/09/27/kavanaugh-hearing-transcript/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.0a7f36e037a0
But by my count, there is only one peer-reviewed article by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford: Use of the Pediatric Symptom Checklist in a Low-Income, Mexican American Population, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(12):1169-1176. doi:10.1001/archpedi.157.12.1169
Why doesn't Google Scholar reveal more articles by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford?
UPDATE: A search for articles by Christine Blasey reveals many more articles. Done!
united-states politics
During the Senate confirmation hearings for Brett Kavanaugh on September 27, 2018, Senator Feinstein said in her introduction, to, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford:
You are a professor affiliated with both Stanford University and Palo Alto University. You have published over 65 peer-reviewed articles and have received numerous awards for your work and research.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/national/wp/2018/09/27/kavanaugh-hearing-transcript/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.0a7f36e037a0
But by my count, there is only one peer-reviewed article by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford: Use of the Pediatric Symptom Checklist in a Low-Income, Mexican American Population, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(12):1169-1176. doi:10.1001/archpedi.157.12.1169
Why doesn't Google Scholar reveal more articles by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford?
UPDATE: A search for articles by Christine Blasey reveals many more articles. Done!
united-states politics
united-states politics
edited 15 mins ago
DJClayworth
38.8k13153157
38.8k13153157
asked 1 hour ago
elliot svensson
38910
38910
2
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's dumb.
â elliot svensson
1 hour ago
2
I think this question is actually quite reasonable and on-topic. You have a clear and sourced claim, as well as a legitimate reason for some doubt on the claim. There is some room for improvement on both the question and the answer, but to me this fits the purpose and format of Sketpics.SE just fine.
â Kamil Drakari
1 hour ago
1
@elliotsvensson it's your question, right? you can delete if you want.
â DavePhD
1 hour ago
Darn it, I didn't notice that. Meh!
â elliot svensson
1 hour ago
Leave it out there, please do not delete. People may question her track record, and there will definitely people who will make the claim that people are lying about and inflating her record based on the same kind of initial search that you did. Your update and answer provide insight.
â PoloHoleSet
28 mins ago
add a comment |Â
2
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's dumb.
â elliot svensson
1 hour ago
2
I think this question is actually quite reasonable and on-topic. You have a clear and sourced claim, as well as a legitimate reason for some doubt on the claim. There is some room for improvement on both the question and the answer, but to me this fits the purpose and format of Sketpics.SE just fine.
â Kamil Drakari
1 hour ago
1
@elliotsvensson it's your question, right? you can delete if you want.
â DavePhD
1 hour ago
Darn it, I didn't notice that. Meh!
â elliot svensson
1 hour ago
Leave it out there, please do not delete. People may question her track record, and there will definitely people who will make the claim that people are lying about and inflating her record based on the same kind of initial search that you did. Your update and answer provide insight.
â PoloHoleSet
28 mins ago
2
2
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's dumb.
â elliot svensson
1 hour ago
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's dumb.
â elliot svensson
1 hour ago
2
2
I think this question is actually quite reasonable and on-topic. You have a clear and sourced claim, as well as a legitimate reason for some doubt on the claim. There is some room for improvement on both the question and the answer, but to me this fits the purpose and format of Sketpics.SE just fine.
â Kamil Drakari
1 hour ago
I think this question is actually quite reasonable and on-topic. You have a clear and sourced claim, as well as a legitimate reason for some doubt on the claim. There is some room for improvement on both the question and the answer, but to me this fits the purpose and format of Sketpics.SE just fine.
â Kamil Drakari
1 hour ago
1
1
@elliotsvensson it's your question, right? you can delete if you want.
â DavePhD
1 hour ago
@elliotsvensson it's your question, right? you can delete if you want.
â DavePhD
1 hour ago
Darn it, I didn't notice that. Meh!
â elliot svensson
1 hour ago
Darn it, I didn't notice that. Meh!
â elliot svensson
1 hour ago
Leave it out there, please do not delete. People may question her track record, and there will definitely people who will make the claim that people are lying about and inflating her record based on the same kind of initial search that you did. Your update and answer provide insight.
â PoloHoleSet
28 mins ago
Leave it out there, please do not delete. People may question her track record, and there will definitely people who will make the claim that people are lying about and inflating her record based on the same kind of initial search that you did. Your update and answer provide insight.
â PoloHoleSet
28 mins ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
Most of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's articles are under the name Christine Blasey. That's why they weren't showing up in the Google Scholar search.
Are you sure it's the same person. Many people will begin using a third name to differentiate themselves from a person with the same first and last name.
â fredsbend
1 hour ago
1
Her Wikipedia page says that she was a frequent collaborator with Helena Chmura Kraemer, who is shown on the same papers as Christine Blasey.
â elliot svensson
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
Most of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's articles are under the name Christine Blasey. That's why they weren't showing up in the Google Scholar search.
Are you sure it's the same person. Many people will begin using a third name to differentiate themselves from a person with the same first and last name.
â fredsbend
1 hour ago
1
Her Wikipedia page says that she was a frequent collaborator with Helena Chmura Kraemer, who is shown on the same papers as Christine Blasey.
â elliot svensson
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
Most of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's articles are under the name Christine Blasey. That's why they weren't showing up in the Google Scholar search.
Are you sure it's the same person. Many people will begin using a third name to differentiate themselves from a person with the same first and last name.
â fredsbend
1 hour ago
1
Her Wikipedia page says that she was a frequent collaborator with Helena Chmura Kraemer, who is shown on the same papers as Christine Blasey.
â elliot svensson
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
Most of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's articles are under the name Christine Blasey. That's why they weren't showing up in the Google Scholar search.
Most of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's articles are under the name Christine Blasey. That's why they weren't showing up in the Google Scholar search.
answered 1 hour ago
elliot svensson
38910
38910
Are you sure it's the same person. Many people will begin using a third name to differentiate themselves from a person with the same first and last name.
â fredsbend
1 hour ago
1
Her Wikipedia page says that she was a frequent collaborator with Helena Chmura Kraemer, who is shown on the same papers as Christine Blasey.
â elliot svensson
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
Are you sure it's the same person. Many people will begin using a third name to differentiate themselves from a person with the same first and last name.
â fredsbend
1 hour ago
1
Her Wikipedia page says that she was a frequent collaborator with Helena Chmura Kraemer, who is shown on the same papers as Christine Blasey.
â elliot svensson
1 hour ago
Are you sure it's the same person. Many people will begin using a third name to differentiate themselves from a person with the same first and last name.
â fredsbend
1 hour ago
Are you sure it's the same person. Many people will begin using a third name to differentiate themselves from a person with the same first and last name.
â fredsbend
1 hour ago
1
1
Her Wikipedia page says that she was a frequent collaborator with Helena Chmura Kraemer, who is shown on the same papers as Christine Blasey.
â elliot svensson
1 hour ago
Her Wikipedia page says that she was a frequent collaborator with Helena Chmura Kraemer, who is shown on the same papers as Christine Blasey.
â elliot svensson
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
2
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's dumb.
â elliot svensson
1 hour ago
2
I think this question is actually quite reasonable and on-topic. You have a clear and sourced claim, as well as a legitimate reason for some doubt on the claim. There is some room for improvement on both the question and the answer, but to me this fits the purpose and format of Sketpics.SE just fine.
â Kamil Drakari
1 hour ago
1
@elliotsvensson it's your question, right? you can delete if you want.
â DavePhD
1 hour ago
Darn it, I didn't notice that. Meh!
â elliot svensson
1 hour ago
Leave it out there, please do not delete. People may question her track record, and there will definitely people who will make the claim that people are lying about and inflating her record based on the same kind of initial search that you did. Your update and answer provide insight.
â PoloHoleSet
28 mins ago