The sorting of perturbational effects by the power

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I have developed an orbital propagation tool, which considers the effects of Sun, Moon, Earth harmonics, SRP, drag, relativistic correction.



First question



Considering the LEO orbit, I would sort the perturbational effects in the following order:



  1. Harmonics

  2. Sun

  3. Moon

  4. Atmospheric drag

  5. SRP

  6. Relativity

Is it correct?



Second question



I've already considered 6 effects.



  • Is there any other effect, which has an influence more than any of these?

  • On which place would be the Earth solid and ocean tides effect? What would be the magnitude of the effect?









share|improve this question





















  • thanks for your accept, but the question is only 3 hours old; hasn't even gone around the Earth once! If you give it a day or two you may discover that you receive even more and more useful answers.
    – uhoh
    11 mins ago










  • @uhoh I would wait!) BTW, for the harmonics coefficients, I used the JGM-3 TideFree model. May be, the Tides are already implemented there? earth-info.nga.mil/GandG/wgs84/gravitymod/egm2008/…
    – Leeloo
    8 mins ago














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I have developed an orbital propagation tool, which considers the effects of Sun, Moon, Earth harmonics, SRP, drag, relativistic correction.



First question



Considering the LEO orbit, I would sort the perturbational effects in the following order:



  1. Harmonics

  2. Sun

  3. Moon

  4. Atmospheric drag

  5. SRP

  6. Relativity

Is it correct?



Second question



I've already considered 6 effects.



  • Is there any other effect, which has an influence more than any of these?

  • On which place would be the Earth solid and ocean tides effect? What would be the magnitude of the effect?









share|improve this question





















  • thanks for your accept, but the question is only 3 hours old; hasn't even gone around the Earth once! If you give it a day or two you may discover that you receive even more and more useful answers.
    – uhoh
    11 mins ago










  • @uhoh I would wait!) BTW, for the harmonics coefficients, I used the JGM-3 TideFree model. May be, the Tides are already implemented there? earth-info.nga.mil/GandG/wgs84/gravitymod/egm2008/…
    – Leeloo
    8 mins ago












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I have developed an orbital propagation tool, which considers the effects of Sun, Moon, Earth harmonics, SRP, drag, relativistic correction.



First question



Considering the LEO orbit, I would sort the perturbational effects in the following order:



  1. Harmonics

  2. Sun

  3. Moon

  4. Atmospheric drag

  5. SRP

  6. Relativity

Is it correct?



Second question



I've already considered 6 effects.



  • Is there any other effect, which has an influence more than any of these?

  • On which place would be the Earth solid and ocean tides effect? What would be the magnitude of the effect?









share|improve this question













I have developed an orbital propagation tool, which considers the effects of Sun, Moon, Earth harmonics, SRP, drag, relativistic correction.



First question



Considering the LEO orbit, I would sort the perturbational effects in the following order:



  1. Harmonics

  2. Sun

  3. Moon

  4. Atmospheric drag

  5. SRP

  6. Relativity

Is it correct?



Second question



I've already considered 6 effects.



  • Is there any other effect, which has an influence more than any of these?

  • On which place would be the Earth solid and ocean tides effect? What would be the magnitude of the effect?






orbital-mechanics tides






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









Leeloo

41010




41010











  • thanks for your accept, but the question is only 3 hours old; hasn't even gone around the Earth once! If you give it a day or two you may discover that you receive even more and more useful answers.
    – uhoh
    11 mins ago










  • @uhoh I would wait!) BTW, for the harmonics coefficients, I used the JGM-3 TideFree model. May be, the Tides are already implemented there? earth-info.nga.mil/GandG/wgs84/gravitymod/egm2008/…
    – Leeloo
    8 mins ago
















  • thanks for your accept, but the question is only 3 hours old; hasn't even gone around the Earth once! If you give it a day or two you may discover that you receive even more and more useful answers.
    – uhoh
    11 mins ago










  • @uhoh I would wait!) BTW, for the harmonics coefficients, I used the JGM-3 TideFree model. May be, the Tides are already implemented there? earth-info.nga.mil/GandG/wgs84/gravitymod/egm2008/…
    – Leeloo
    8 mins ago















thanks for your accept, but the question is only 3 hours old; hasn't even gone around the Earth once! If you give it a day or two you may discover that you receive even more and more useful answers.
– uhoh
11 mins ago




thanks for your accept, but the question is only 3 hours old; hasn't even gone around the Earth once! If you give it a day or two you may discover that you receive even more and more useful answers.
– uhoh
11 mins ago












@uhoh I would wait!) BTW, for the harmonics coefficients, I used the JGM-3 TideFree model. May be, the Tides are already implemented there? earth-info.nga.mil/GandG/wgs84/gravitymod/egm2008/…
– Leeloo
8 mins ago




@uhoh I would wait!) BTW, for the harmonics coefficients, I used the JGM-3 TideFree model. May be, the Tides are already implemented there? earth-info.nga.mil/GandG/wgs84/gravitymod/egm2008/…
– Leeloo
8 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Here is en excerpt from the question Questions about the Dynamic Solid Tide. There is more about those effects in the question and especially in the answers.



As you can see the strengths of several effects depend in different ways on the average distance from the Earth, as they would for other aspects of the orbit's parameters.



In other words, it doesn't really make sense to try to rank them without specifying a specific orbit.




I found the following plot in the book Satellite Orbits; Models, Methods, Applications by Oliver Montenbruck and Eberhard Gill, Springer, 2000. The figure and description can also be found in google books. It's a low quality snapshot but it's hard to capture a dozen different dependencies over 20 orders of magnitude without showing the whole thing.



Satellite Orbits; Models, Methods, Applications, Montenbruck & Eberhard Gill







share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    If of help, from my old Orbital Mechanics courses we have this plot (sorry that it is in spanish).



    LEO disturbances



    There are two plots for drag ($R_aer$) because it depends on the atmosphere of that day, but you can have an idea. The only remark I would made is that for LEO Moon effect is always higher than the Sun's ones. The bars of Shuttle and ISS denotes the range of altitudes for those.



    Regarding Earth and ocean tides I am sure that they can be modelled as spherical harmonics also. Anyway I am pretty sure that their effect is at least lower than solar radiation pressure.






    share|improve this answer




















      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "508"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31599%2fthe-sorting-of-perturbational-effects-by-the-power%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted










      Here is en excerpt from the question Questions about the Dynamic Solid Tide. There is more about those effects in the question and especially in the answers.



      As you can see the strengths of several effects depend in different ways on the average distance from the Earth, as they would for other aspects of the orbit's parameters.



      In other words, it doesn't really make sense to try to rank them without specifying a specific orbit.




      I found the following plot in the book Satellite Orbits; Models, Methods, Applications by Oliver Montenbruck and Eberhard Gill, Springer, 2000. The figure and description can also be found in google books. It's a low quality snapshot but it's hard to capture a dozen different dependencies over 20 orders of magnitude without showing the whole thing.



      Satellite Orbits; Models, Methods, Applications, Montenbruck & Eberhard Gill







      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted










        Here is en excerpt from the question Questions about the Dynamic Solid Tide. There is more about those effects in the question and especially in the answers.



        As you can see the strengths of several effects depend in different ways on the average distance from the Earth, as they would for other aspects of the orbit's parameters.



        In other words, it doesn't really make sense to try to rank them without specifying a specific orbit.




        I found the following plot in the book Satellite Orbits; Models, Methods, Applications by Oliver Montenbruck and Eberhard Gill, Springer, 2000. The figure and description can also be found in google books. It's a low quality snapshot but it's hard to capture a dozen different dependencies over 20 orders of magnitude without showing the whole thing.



        Satellite Orbits; Models, Methods, Applications, Montenbruck & Eberhard Gill







        share|improve this answer






















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          Here is en excerpt from the question Questions about the Dynamic Solid Tide. There is more about those effects in the question and especially in the answers.



          As you can see the strengths of several effects depend in different ways on the average distance from the Earth, as they would for other aspects of the orbit's parameters.



          In other words, it doesn't really make sense to try to rank them without specifying a specific orbit.




          I found the following plot in the book Satellite Orbits; Models, Methods, Applications by Oliver Montenbruck and Eberhard Gill, Springer, 2000. The figure and description can also be found in google books. It's a low quality snapshot but it's hard to capture a dozen different dependencies over 20 orders of magnitude without showing the whole thing.



          Satellite Orbits; Models, Methods, Applications, Montenbruck & Eberhard Gill







          share|improve this answer












          Here is en excerpt from the question Questions about the Dynamic Solid Tide. There is more about those effects in the question and especially in the answers.



          As you can see the strengths of several effects depend in different ways on the average distance from the Earth, as they would for other aspects of the orbit's parameters.



          In other words, it doesn't really make sense to try to rank them without specifying a specific orbit.




          I found the following plot in the book Satellite Orbits; Models, Methods, Applications by Oliver Montenbruck and Eberhard Gill, Springer, 2000. The figure and description can also be found in google books. It's a low quality snapshot but it's hard to capture a dozen different dependencies over 20 orders of magnitude without showing the whole thing.



          Satellite Orbits; Models, Methods, Applications, Montenbruck & Eberhard Gill








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          uhoh

          30.4k15104373




          30.4k15104373




















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              If of help, from my old Orbital Mechanics courses we have this plot (sorry that it is in spanish).



              LEO disturbances



              There are two plots for drag ($R_aer$) because it depends on the atmosphere of that day, but you can have an idea. The only remark I would made is that for LEO Moon effect is always higher than the Sun's ones. The bars of Shuttle and ISS denotes the range of altitudes for those.



              Regarding Earth and ocean tides I am sure that they can be modelled as spherical harmonics also. Anyway I am pretty sure that their effect is at least lower than solar radiation pressure.






              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                If of help, from my old Orbital Mechanics courses we have this plot (sorry that it is in spanish).



                LEO disturbances



                There are two plots for drag ($R_aer$) because it depends on the atmosphere of that day, but you can have an idea. The only remark I would made is that for LEO Moon effect is always higher than the Sun's ones. The bars of Shuttle and ISS denotes the range of altitudes for those.



                Regarding Earth and ocean tides I am sure that they can be modelled as spherical harmonics also. Anyway I am pretty sure that their effect is at least lower than solar radiation pressure.






                share|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  If of help, from my old Orbital Mechanics courses we have this plot (sorry that it is in spanish).



                  LEO disturbances



                  There are two plots for drag ($R_aer$) because it depends on the atmosphere of that day, but you can have an idea. The only remark I would made is that for LEO Moon effect is always higher than the Sun's ones. The bars of Shuttle and ISS denotes the range of altitudes for those.



                  Regarding Earth and ocean tides I am sure that they can be modelled as spherical harmonics also. Anyway I am pretty sure that their effect is at least lower than solar radiation pressure.






                  share|improve this answer












                  If of help, from my old Orbital Mechanics courses we have this plot (sorry that it is in spanish).



                  LEO disturbances



                  There are two plots for drag ($R_aer$) because it depends on the atmosphere of that day, but you can have an idea. The only remark I would made is that for LEO Moon effect is always higher than the Sun's ones. The bars of Shuttle and ISS denotes the range of altitudes for those.



                  Regarding Earth and ocean tides I am sure that they can be modelled as spherical harmonics also. Anyway I am pretty sure that their effect is at least lower than solar radiation pressure.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 3 hours ago









                  Julio

                  1,109223




                  1,109223



























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31599%2fthe-sorting-of-perturbational-effects-by-the-power%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Comments

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      List of Gilmore Girls characters

                      What does second last employer means? [closed]

                      One-line joke