Why ordinal number has been used in “fourth helpings at every meal”?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
1
down vote

favorite













Mrs Weasley fussed over the state of his socks and tried to force him to eat fourth helpings at every meal.




The word "helping" is a countable noun, meaning a single portion of food taken at a meal. So, I might think four helpings at every meal seems to be more reasonable. On the other hand, usually the ordinal number is preceded by the definite article "the", like "the fourth helpings". Any thoughts?










share|improve this question



















  • 2




    Ordinals are commonly used when discussing helpings at mealtimes in Britain, especially school meals, where an extra helping can be called "seconds" or more formally "a second helping". She tried to make him eat "fourths", having already succeeded with seconds and thirds.
    – Michael Harvey
    43 mins ago











  • The lack of a definite article is entirely appropriate.
    – Michael Harvey
    40 mins ago






  • 1




    "Helping" is one of those weird words which must be in addition to the first serving. There is no such thing as "first helpings". As such, I think second/third/fourth helpings would tend to suggest "fourth of several helpings" and therefore plural. Though maybe this is just specious reasoning.
    – Neil
    18 mins ago
















up vote
1
down vote

favorite













Mrs Weasley fussed over the state of his socks and tried to force him to eat fourth helpings at every meal.




The word "helping" is a countable noun, meaning a single portion of food taken at a meal. So, I might think four helpings at every meal seems to be more reasonable. On the other hand, usually the ordinal number is preceded by the definite article "the", like "the fourth helpings". Any thoughts?










share|improve this question



















  • 2




    Ordinals are commonly used when discussing helpings at mealtimes in Britain, especially school meals, where an extra helping can be called "seconds" or more formally "a second helping". She tried to make him eat "fourths", having already succeeded with seconds and thirds.
    – Michael Harvey
    43 mins ago











  • The lack of a definite article is entirely appropriate.
    – Michael Harvey
    40 mins ago






  • 1




    "Helping" is one of those weird words which must be in addition to the first serving. There is no such thing as "first helpings". As such, I think second/third/fourth helpings would tend to suggest "fourth of several helpings" and therefore plural. Though maybe this is just specious reasoning.
    – Neil
    18 mins ago












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Mrs Weasley fussed over the state of his socks and tried to force him to eat fourth helpings at every meal.




The word "helping" is a countable noun, meaning a single portion of food taken at a meal. So, I might think four helpings at every meal seems to be more reasonable. On the other hand, usually the ordinal number is preceded by the definite article "the", like "the fourth helpings". Any thoughts?










share|improve this question
















Mrs Weasley fussed over the state of his socks and tried to force him to eat fourth helpings at every meal.




The word "helping" is a countable noun, meaning a single portion of food taken at a meal. So, I might think four helpings at every meal seems to be more reasonable. On the other hand, usually the ordinal number is preceded by the definite article "the", like "the fourth helpings". Any thoughts?







articles numbers






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 27 mins ago









Andrew

59.5k566131




59.5k566131










asked 57 mins ago









dan

2,62821747




2,62821747







  • 2




    Ordinals are commonly used when discussing helpings at mealtimes in Britain, especially school meals, where an extra helping can be called "seconds" or more formally "a second helping". She tried to make him eat "fourths", having already succeeded with seconds and thirds.
    – Michael Harvey
    43 mins ago











  • The lack of a definite article is entirely appropriate.
    – Michael Harvey
    40 mins ago






  • 1




    "Helping" is one of those weird words which must be in addition to the first serving. There is no such thing as "first helpings". As such, I think second/third/fourth helpings would tend to suggest "fourth of several helpings" and therefore plural. Though maybe this is just specious reasoning.
    – Neil
    18 mins ago












  • 2




    Ordinals are commonly used when discussing helpings at mealtimes in Britain, especially school meals, where an extra helping can be called "seconds" or more formally "a second helping". She tried to make him eat "fourths", having already succeeded with seconds and thirds.
    – Michael Harvey
    43 mins ago











  • The lack of a definite article is entirely appropriate.
    – Michael Harvey
    40 mins ago






  • 1




    "Helping" is one of those weird words which must be in addition to the first serving. There is no such thing as "first helpings". As such, I think second/third/fourth helpings would tend to suggest "fourth of several helpings" and therefore plural. Though maybe this is just specious reasoning.
    – Neil
    18 mins ago







2




2




Ordinals are commonly used when discussing helpings at mealtimes in Britain, especially school meals, where an extra helping can be called "seconds" or more formally "a second helping". She tried to make him eat "fourths", having already succeeded with seconds and thirds.
– Michael Harvey
43 mins ago





Ordinals are commonly used when discussing helpings at mealtimes in Britain, especially school meals, where an extra helping can be called "seconds" or more formally "a second helping". She tried to make him eat "fourths", having already succeeded with seconds and thirds.
– Michael Harvey
43 mins ago













The lack of a definite article is entirely appropriate.
– Michael Harvey
40 mins ago




The lack of a definite article is entirely appropriate.
– Michael Harvey
40 mins ago




1




1




"Helping" is one of those weird words which must be in addition to the first serving. There is no such thing as "first helpings". As such, I think second/third/fourth helpings would tend to suggest "fourth of several helpings" and therefore plural. Though maybe this is just specious reasoning.
– Neil
18 mins ago




"Helping" is one of those weird words which must be in addition to the first serving. There is no such thing as "first helpings". As such, I think second/third/fourth helpings would tend to suggest "fourth of several helpings" and therefore plural. Though maybe this is just specious reasoning.
– Neil
18 mins ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













Compare:




Would you like a second helping?




or




No second helpings! We are saving the rest of the cake for your cousins, who will be back from the game momentarily.




Without the article the ordinal is a determiner, here referring to a specific helping in the sequence of helpings.






share|improve this answer






















  • Can we also put "force him to eat a fourth helping at every meal"?
    – dan
    23 mins ago

















up vote
1
down vote













I think that the expression is related to



second helping




A second portion of the same thing, usually of food; seconds; refill.
He had already eaten six sausages, but that did not stop him reaching
for a second helping.




If we extrapolate a bit, we can conclude that Mrs Weasley was trying to force Harry to eat four times each dish served per meal: the original, the second helping, the third helping and the fourth helping. Remember that they think that he was starving before they rescue him from the Dursleys.






share|improve this answer




















  • It might be a bit diferent in this case. It put "fourth helpings", instead of "fourth helping".
    – dan
    27 mins ago

















up vote
1
down vote













You are correct that "four helpings every meal" is probably more grammatical. This particular use refers to the common idiomatic expression "second helping", meaning a second portion of whatever was served the first time around.




"Would anyone like a second helping?" Mom asked, standing over the table with a full plate of pancakes. We all yelled for more.




"Thirds" and "fourths" are also not uncommon when feeding hungry teenagers.



With this sentence the trick is to recognize that Rowling writes "at every meal", meaning there were multiple meals. At each of these meals Mrs. Weasley offered Harry "a fourth helping" (after, presumably, the first, second and third helpings) -- which, in the plural, becomes "fourth helpings"






share|improve this answer




















  • Can we understand this plural in a way that Mrs Weasley offered Harry a fourth helping a day, and since it's multiple days, therefore "fourth helpings at every meal". Does that sound reasonable?
    – dan
    3 mins ago











Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f183647%2fwhy-ordinal-number-has-been-used-in-fourth-helpings-at-every-meal%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote













Compare:




Would you like a second helping?




or




No second helpings! We are saving the rest of the cake for your cousins, who will be back from the game momentarily.




Without the article the ordinal is a determiner, here referring to a specific helping in the sequence of helpings.






share|improve this answer






















  • Can we also put "force him to eat a fourth helping at every meal"?
    – dan
    23 mins ago














up vote
2
down vote













Compare:




Would you like a second helping?




or




No second helpings! We are saving the rest of the cake for your cousins, who will be back from the game momentarily.




Without the article the ordinal is a determiner, here referring to a specific helping in the sequence of helpings.






share|improve this answer






















  • Can we also put "force him to eat a fourth helping at every meal"?
    – dan
    23 mins ago












up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









Compare:




Would you like a second helping?




or




No second helpings! We are saving the rest of the cake for your cousins, who will be back from the game momentarily.




Without the article the ordinal is a determiner, here referring to a specific helping in the sequence of helpings.






share|improve this answer














Compare:




Would you like a second helping?




or




No second helpings! We are saving the rest of the cake for your cousins, who will be back from the game momentarily.




Without the article the ordinal is a determiner, here referring to a specific helping in the sequence of helpings.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 37 mins ago

























answered 46 mins ago









Tᴚoɯɐuo

99k671165




99k671165











  • Can we also put "force him to eat a fourth helping at every meal"?
    – dan
    23 mins ago
















  • Can we also put "force him to eat a fourth helping at every meal"?
    – dan
    23 mins ago















Can we also put "force him to eat a fourth helping at every meal"?
– dan
23 mins ago




Can we also put "force him to eat a fourth helping at every meal"?
– dan
23 mins ago












up vote
1
down vote













I think that the expression is related to



second helping




A second portion of the same thing, usually of food; seconds; refill.
He had already eaten six sausages, but that did not stop him reaching
for a second helping.




If we extrapolate a bit, we can conclude that Mrs Weasley was trying to force Harry to eat four times each dish served per meal: the original, the second helping, the third helping and the fourth helping. Remember that they think that he was starving before they rescue him from the Dursleys.






share|improve this answer




















  • It might be a bit diferent in this case. It put "fourth helpings", instead of "fourth helping".
    – dan
    27 mins ago














up vote
1
down vote













I think that the expression is related to



second helping




A second portion of the same thing, usually of food; seconds; refill.
He had already eaten six sausages, but that did not stop him reaching
for a second helping.




If we extrapolate a bit, we can conclude that Mrs Weasley was trying to force Harry to eat four times each dish served per meal: the original, the second helping, the third helping and the fourth helping. Remember that they think that he was starving before they rescue him from the Dursleys.






share|improve this answer




















  • It might be a bit diferent in this case. It put "fourth helpings", instead of "fourth helping".
    – dan
    27 mins ago












up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









I think that the expression is related to



second helping




A second portion of the same thing, usually of food; seconds; refill.
He had already eaten six sausages, but that did not stop him reaching
for a second helping.




If we extrapolate a bit, we can conclude that Mrs Weasley was trying to force Harry to eat four times each dish served per meal: the original, the second helping, the third helping and the fourth helping. Remember that they think that he was starving before they rescue him from the Dursleys.






share|improve this answer












I think that the expression is related to



second helping




A second portion of the same thing, usually of food; seconds; refill.
He had already eaten six sausages, but that did not stop him reaching
for a second helping.




If we extrapolate a bit, we can conclude that Mrs Weasley was trying to force Harry to eat four times each dish served per meal: the original, the second helping, the third helping and the fourth helping. Remember that they think that he was starving before they rescue him from the Dursleys.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 44 mins ago









RubioRic

3,1841829




3,1841829











  • It might be a bit diferent in this case. It put "fourth helpings", instead of "fourth helping".
    – dan
    27 mins ago
















  • It might be a bit diferent in this case. It put "fourth helpings", instead of "fourth helping".
    – dan
    27 mins ago















It might be a bit diferent in this case. It put "fourth helpings", instead of "fourth helping".
– dan
27 mins ago




It might be a bit diferent in this case. It put "fourth helpings", instead of "fourth helping".
– dan
27 mins ago










up vote
1
down vote













You are correct that "four helpings every meal" is probably more grammatical. This particular use refers to the common idiomatic expression "second helping", meaning a second portion of whatever was served the first time around.




"Would anyone like a second helping?" Mom asked, standing over the table with a full plate of pancakes. We all yelled for more.




"Thirds" and "fourths" are also not uncommon when feeding hungry teenagers.



With this sentence the trick is to recognize that Rowling writes "at every meal", meaning there were multiple meals. At each of these meals Mrs. Weasley offered Harry "a fourth helping" (after, presumably, the first, second and third helpings) -- which, in the plural, becomes "fourth helpings"






share|improve this answer




















  • Can we understand this plural in a way that Mrs Weasley offered Harry a fourth helping a day, and since it's multiple days, therefore "fourth helpings at every meal". Does that sound reasonable?
    – dan
    3 mins ago















up vote
1
down vote













You are correct that "four helpings every meal" is probably more grammatical. This particular use refers to the common idiomatic expression "second helping", meaning a second portion of whatever was served the first time around.




"Would anyone like a second helping?" Mom asked, standing over the table with a full plate of pancakes. We all yelled for more.




"Thirds" and "fourths" are also not uncommon when feeding hungry teenagers.



With this sentence the trick is to recognize that Rowling writes "at every meal", meaning there were multiple meals. At each of these meals Mrs. Weasley offered Harry "a fourth helping" (after, presumably, the first, second and third helpings) -- which, in the plural, becomes "fourth helpings"






share|improve this answer




















  • Can we understand this plural in a way that Mrs Weasley offered Harry a fourth helping a day, and since it's multiple days, therefore "fourth helpings at every meal". Does that sound reasonable?
    – dan
    3 mins ago













up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









You are correct that "four helpings every meal" is probably more grammatical. This particular use refers to the common idiomatic expression "second helping", meaning a second portion of whatever was served the first time around.




"Would anyone like a second helping?" Mom asked, standing over the table with a full plate of pancakes. We all yelled for more.




"Thirds" and "fourths" are also not uncommon when feeding hungry teenagers.



With this sentence the trick is to recognize that Rowling writes "at every meal", meaning there were multiple meals. At each of these meals Mrs. Weasley offered Harry "a fourth helping" (after, presumably, the first, second and third helpings) -- which, in the plural, becomes "fourth helpings"






share|improve this answer












You are correct that "four helpings every meal" is probably more grammatical. This particular use refers to the common idiomatic expression "second helping", meaning a second portion of whatever was served the first time around.




"Would anyone like a second helping?" Mom asked, standing over the table with a full plate of pancakes. We all yelled for more.




"Thirds" and "fourths" are also not uncommon when feeding hungry teenagers.



With this sentence the trick is to recognize that Rowling writes "at every meal", meaning there were multiple meals. At each of these meals Mrs. Weasley offered Harry "a fourth helping" (after, presumably, the first, second and third helpings) -- which, in the plural, becomes "fourth helpings"







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 19 mins ago









Andrew

59.5k566131




59.5k566131











  • Can we understand this plural in a way that Mrs Weasley offered Harry a fourth helping a day, and since it's multiple days, therefore "fourth helpings at every meal". Does that sound reasonable?
    – dan
    3 mins ago

















  • Can we understand this plural in a way that Mrs Weasley offered Harry a fourth helping a day, and since it's multiple days, therefore "fourth helpings at every meal". Does that sound reasonable?
    – dan
    3 mins ago
















Can we understand this plural in a way that Mrs Weasley offered Harry a fourth helping a day, and since it's multiple days, therefore "fourth helpings at every meal". Does that sound reasonable?
– dan
3 mins ago





Can we understand this plural in a way that Mrs Weasley offered Harry a fourth helping a day, and since it's multiple days, therefore "fourth helpings at every meal". Does that sound reasonable?
– dan
3 mins ago


















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f183647%2fwhy-ordinal-number-has-been-used-in-fourth-helpings-at-every-meal%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

Confectionery