How common is it to use “D-Day” to refer to an important day in the future?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
1
down vote

favorite












In French, we use "D-Day" (Jour J) for any major coming event, a wedding for instance.



But when I look for "D-Day", I mostly find results on the Normandy landings, or military usage in general.



The Cambridge dictionary states "D-Day" can be used for a day when something important will happen, and Collins Dictionary seems to say that this usage is valid only in British English.



How common is it in English to use "D-Day" as a reference to an important coming day? Can I say:




The preparations will be complete for the D-Day.




Or:




The elections are coming soon. We are ready to vote on the D-Day.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Julien Lopez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    In French, we use "D-Day" (Jour J) for any major coming event, a wedding for instance.



    But when I look for "D-Day", I mostly find results on the Normandy landings, or military usage in general.



    The Cambridge dictionary states "D-Day" can be used for a day when something important will happen, and Collins Dictionary seems to say that this usage is valid only in British English.



    How common is it in English to use "D-Day" as a reference to an important coming day? Can I say:




    The preparations will be complete for the D-Day.




    Or:




    The elections are coming soon. We are ready to vote on the D-Day.











    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    Julien Lopez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      In French, we use "D-Day" (Jour J) for any major coming event, a wedding for instance.



      But when I look for "D-Day", I mostly find results on the Normandy landings, or military usage in general.



      The Cambridge dictionary states "D-Day" can be used for a day when something important will happen, and Collins Dictionary seems to say that this usage is valid only in British English.



      How common is it in English to use "D-Day" as a reference to an important coming day? Can I say:




      The preparations will be complete for the D-Day.




      Or:




      The elections are coming soon. We are ready to vote on the D-Day.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Julien Lopez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      In French, we use "D-Day" (Jour J) for any major coming event, a wedding for instance.



      But when I look for "D-Day", I mostly find results on the Normandy landings, or military usage in general.



      The Cambridge dictionary states "D-Day" can be used for a day when something important will happen, and Collins Dictionary seems to say that this usage is valid only in British English.



      How common is it in English to use "D-Day" as a reference to an important coming day? Can I say:




      The preparations will be complete for the D-Day.




      Or:




      The elections are coming soon. We are ready to vote on the D-Day.








      word-usage






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Julien Lopez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Julien Lopez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      Julien Lopez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 1 hour ago









      Julien Lopez

      1064




      1064




      New contributor




      Julien Lopez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Julien Lopez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Julien Lopez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          In America, and perhaps other English-speaking countries, most people think of the historical event first, and tend to work backward from there by analogy to other uses. This is at least partly because American troops made the landings at Omaha Beach, the most heavily-opposed and bloody of the landings, and the losses sustained there left a deep impression on the American collective consciousness. (The troops landing on other beaches were mostly British and American and some Canadians, with Australians, Free French, and New Zealanders mostly in naval and air support roles.)



          Typically, then, "D-Day" carries connotations of anxious preparations for an event that probably won't be enjoyable. Using it for a wedding sounds strange, although one could take advantage of that contrast for some slightly dark humor from the over-stressed planners. Using it to talk about voting in elections doesn't make much sense at all, as there's no direct repercussions for voting poorly.






          share|improve this answer




















          • "there's no direct repercussions for voting poorly." I would disagree on that. ;-) Thank you very much for your answer!
            – Julien Lopez
            23 mins ago










          • @JulienLopez: There are certainly likely to be indirect repercussions, but those show up in a way that's not at all directly connected to your specific actions. Rather than, say, falling flat on your face while walking up the aisle, you just get politicians that after a few months have introduced more policies that you don't like and fewer that you do.
            – Nathan Tuggy
            20 mins ago

















          up vote
          2
          down vote














          "...and Collins Dictionary seems to say that this usage is valid only in British English."




          As an American, I would have to agree. I think that if we use it, it refers not just to an important event, but one that is likely going to be disastrous or perhaps chaotic(?). The only examples I can find on Google are political or about investments, such as,




          “The House Is Already Lost”: As the Midterms Approach, G.O.P. [political party] Insiders Prepare for an Electoral D-Day







          share|improve this answer




















            Your Answer







            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "481"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            Julien Lopez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f183615%2fhow-common-is-it-to-use-d-day-to-refer-to-an-important-day-in-the-future%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote













            In America, and perhaps other English-speaking countries, most people think of the historical event first, and tend to work backward from there by analogy to other uses. This is at least partly because American troops made the landings at Omaha Beach, the most heavily-opposed and bloody of the landings, and the losses sustained there left a deep impression on the American collective consciousness. (The troops landing on other beaches were mostly British and American and some Canadians, with Australians, Free French, and New Zealanders mostly in naval and air support roles.)



            Typically, then, "D-Day" carries connotations of anxious preparations for an event that probably won't be enjoyable. Using it for a wedding sounds strange, although one could take advantage of that contrast for some slightly dark humor from the over-stressed planners. Using it to talk about voting in elections doesn't make much sense at all, as there's no direct repercussions for voting poorly.






            share|improve this answer




















            • "there's no direct repercussions for voting poorly." I would disagree on that. ;-) Thank you very much for your answer!
              – Julien Lopez
              23 mins ago










            • @JulienLopez: There are certainly likely to be indirect repercussions, but those show up in a way that's not at all directly connected to your specific actions. Rather than, say, falling flat on your face while walking up the aisle, you just get politicians that after a few months have introduced more policies that you don't like and fewer that you do.
              – Nathan Tuggy
              20 mins ago














            up vote
            2
            down vote













            In America, and perhaps other English-speaking countries, most people think of the historical event first, and tend to work backward from there by analogy to other uses. This is at least partly because American troops made the landings at Omaha Beach, the most heavily-opposed and bloody of the landings, and the losses sustained there left a deep impression on the American collective consciousness. (The troops landing on other beaches were mostly British and American and some Canadians, with Australians, Free French, and New Zealanders mostly in naval and air support roles.)



            Typically, then, "D-Day" carries connotations of anxious preparations for an event that probably won't be enjoyable. Using it for a wedding sounds strange, although one could take advantage of that contrast for some slightly dark humor from the over-stressed planners. Using it to talk about voting in elections doesn't make much sense at all, as there's no direct repercussions for voting poorly.






            share|improve this answer




















            • "there's no direct repercussions for voting poorly." I would disagree on that. ;-) Thank you very much for your answer!
              – Julien Lopez
              23 mins ago










            • @JulienLopez: There are certainly likely to be indirect repercussions, but those show up in a way that's not at all directly connected to your specific actions. Rather than, say, falling flat on your face while walking up the aisle, you just get politicians that after a few months have introduced more policies that you don't like and fewer that you do.
              – Nathan Tuggy
              20 mins ago












            up vote
            2
            down vote










            up vote
            2
            down vote









            In America, and perhaps other English-speaking countries, most people think of the historical event first, and tend to work backward from there by analogy to other uses. This is at least partly because American troops made the landings at Omaha Beach, the most heavily-opposed and bloody of the landings, and the losses sustained there left a deep impression on the American collective consciousness. (The troops landing on other beaches were mostly British and American and some Canadians, with Australians, Free French, and New Zealanders mostly in naval and air support roles.)



            Typically, then, "D-Day" carries connotations of anxious preparations for an event that probably won't be enjoyable. Using it for a wedding sounds strange, although one could take advantage of that contrast for some slightly dark humor from the over-stressed planners. Using it to talk about voting in elections doesn't make much sense at all, as there's no direct repercussions for voting poorly.






            share|improve this answer












            In America, and perhaps other English-speaking countries, most people think of the historical event first, and tend to work backward from there by analogy to other uses. This is at least partly because American troops made the landings at Omaha Beach, the most heavily-opposed and bloody of the landings, and the losses sustained there left a deep impression on the American collective consciousness. (The troops landing on other beaches were mostly British and American and some Canadians, with Australians, Free French, and New Zealanders mostly in naval and air support roles.)



            Typically, then, "D-Day" carries connotations of anxious preparations for an event that probably won't be enjoyable. Using it for a wedding sounds strange, although one could take advantage of that contrast for some slightly dark humor from the over-stressed planners. Using it to talk about voting in elections doesn't make much sense at all, as there's no direct repercussions for voting poorly.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 30 mins ago









            Nathan Tuggy

            8,96293452




            8,96293452











            • "there's no direct repercussions for voting poorly." I would disagree on that. ;-) Thank you very much for your answer!
              – Julien Lopez
              23 mins ago










            • @JulienLopez: There are certainly likely to be indirect repercussions, but those show up in a way that's not at all directly connected to your specific actions. Rather than, say, falling flat on your face while walking up the aisle, you just get politicians that after a few months have introduced more policies that you don't like and fewer that you do.
              – Nathan Tuggy
              20 mins ago
















            • "there's no direct repercussions for voting poorly." I would disagree on that. ;-) Thank you very much for your answer!
              – Julien Lopez
              23 mins ago










            • @JulienLopez: There are certainly likely to be indirect repercussions, but those show up in a way that's not at all directly connected to your specific actions. Rather than, say, falling flat on your face while walking up the aisle, you just get politicians that after a few months have introduced more policies that you don't like and fewer that you do.
              – Nathan Tuggy
              20 mins ago















            "there's no direct repercussions for voting poorly." I would disagree on that. ;-) Thank you very much for your answer!
            – Julien Lopez
            23 mins ago




            "there's no direct repercussions for voting poorly." I would disagree on that. ;-) Thank you very much for your answer!
            – Julien Lopez
            23 mins ago












            @JulienLopez: There are certainly likely to be indirect repercussions, but those show up in a way that's not at all directly connected to your specific actions. Rather than, say, falling flat on your face while walking up the aisle, you just get politicians that after a few months have introduced more policies that you don't like and fewer that you do.
            – Nathan Tuggy
            20 mins ago




            @JulienLopez: There are certainly likely to be indirect repercussions, but those show up in a way that's not at all directly connected to your specific actions. Rather than, say, falling flat on your face while walking up the aisle, you just get politicians that after a few months have introduced more policies that you don't like and fewer that you do.
            – Nathan Tuggy
            20 mins ago












            up vote
            2
            down vote














            "...and Collins Dictionary seems to say that this usage is valid only in British English."




            As an American, I would have to agree. I think that if we use it, it refers not just to an important event, but one that is likely going to be disastrous or perhaps chaotic(?). The only examples I can find on Google are political or about investments, such as,




            “The House Is Already Lost”: As the Midterms Approach, G.O.P. [political party] Insiders Prepare for an Electoral D-Day







            share|improve this answer
























              up vote
              2
              down vote














              "...and Collins Dictionary seems to say that this usage is valid only in British English."




              As an American, I would have to agree. I think that if we use it, it refers not just to an important event, but one that is likely going to be disastrous or perhaps chaotic(?). The only examples I can find on Google are political or about investments, such as,




              “The House Is Already Lost”: As the Midterms Approach, G.O.P. [political party] Insiders Prepare for an Electoral D-Day







              share|improve this answer






















                up vote
                2
                down vote










                up vote
                2
                down vote










                "...and Collins Dictionary seems to say that this usage is valid only in British English."




                As an American, I would have to agree. I think that if we use it, it refers not just to an important event, but one that is likely going to be disastrous or perhaps chaotic(?). The only examples I can find on Google are political or about investments, such as,




                “The House Is Already Lost”: As the Midterms Approach, G.O.P. [political party] Insiders Prepare for an Electoral D-Day







                share|improve this answer













                "...and Collins Dictionary seems to say that this usage is valid only in British English."




                As an American, I would have to agree. I think that if we use it, it refers not just to an important event, but one that is likely going to be disastrous or perhaps chaotic(?). The only examples I can find on Google are political or about investments, such as,




                “The House Is Already Lost”: As the Midterms Approach, G.O.P. [political party] Insiders Prepare for an Electoral D-Day








                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 22 mins ago









                HiddenBabel

                45616




                45616




















                    Julien Lopez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


















                    Julien Lopez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Julien Lopez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    Julien Lopez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f183615%2fhow-common-is-it-to-use-d-day-to-refer-to-an-important-day-in-the-future%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What does second last employer means? [closed]

                    List of Gilmore Girls characters

                    Confectionery