Mixing
What factors should I consider when a candidate asks to do a “phone screen†in person?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
10
down vote
favorite
I'm currently doing phone screens to try and hire a new employee (software developer).
One of the people I was going to do a phone screen with asked if he could come in and do the interview in person.
Is there any downside that you can think of to doing an interview in person if all the other candidates are done over the phone?
interviewing phone
edited Feb 26 '14 at 2:12
Elysian Fields♦
96.9k46292449
asked Feb 25 '14 at 21:15
chollida
195211
add a comment |Â
up vote
10
down vote
favorite
I'm currently doing phone screens to try and hire a new employee (software developer).
One of the people I was going to do a phone screen with asked if he could come in and do the interview in person.
Is there any downside that you can think of to doing an interview in person if all the other candidates are done over the phone?
interviewing phone
edited Feb 26 '14 at 2:12
Elysian Fields♦
96.9k46292449
asked Feb 25 '14 at 21:15
chollida
195211
9
Presumably you have the phone screening phase to work out who you want to interview face-to-face, saving time in the long run. Sure, it won't be decremental, but it seems like a waste of time for both parties.
– Joe
Feb 25 '14 at 21:19
3
It sounds to me like an effective interviewee tactic, to be honest; one of the first rules of interviewing is 'get your foot in the door', right?
– Joe
Feb 25 '14 at 21:56
1
chollida, I modified the title slightly to better match what you were asking - great question and welcome to The Workplace!
– Elysian Fields♦
Feb 26 '14 at 2:12
2
Does the person lip read? Are they hard to understand on the phone?
– Ian
Feb 26 '14 at 13:02
As a software developer, I hate technical phone screens (as the interviewer or the interviewee). Asking technical questions over the phone usually involves definitions or "name the library/method that you use when..." questions. These are the sort of questions that a CS undergrad could answer more easily than someone with years of experience in the field, and they fail to reflect the interviewee's abilities. That's not to mention that the answers can usually be found quickly using Google, which gives the advantage to interviewees who are willing to "cheat".
– Brian
Apr 22 '15 at 22:33
add a comment |Â
up vote
10
down vote
favorite
up vote
10
down vote
favorite
I'm currently doing phone screens to try and hire a new employee (software developer).
One of the people I was going to do a phone screen with asked if he could come in and do the interview in person.
Is there any downside that you can think of to doing an interview in person if all the other candidates are done over the phone?
interviewing phone
edited Feb 26 '14 at 2:12
Elysian Fields♦
96.9k46292449
asked Feb 25 '14 at 21:15
chollida
195211
I'm currently doing phone screens to try and hire a new employee (software developer).
One of the people I was going to do a phone screen with asked if he could come in and do the interview in person.
Is there any downside that you can think of to doing an interview in person if all the other candidates are done over the phone?
interviewing phone
edited Feb 26 '14 at 2:12
Elysian Fields♦
96.9k46292449
asked Feb 25 '14 at 21:15
chollida
195211
edited Feb 26 '14 at 2:12
Elysian Fields♦
96.9k46292449
edited Feb 26 '14 at 2:12
Elysian Fields♦
96.9k46292449
edited Feb 26 '14 at 2:12
Elysian Fields♦
96.9k46292449
96.9k46292449
asked Feb 25 '14 at 21:15
chollida
195211
asked Feb 25 '14 at 21:15
chollida
195211
asked Feb 25 '14 at 21:15
chollida
195211
195211
9
Presumably you have the phone screening phase to work out who you want to interview face-to-face, saving time in the long run. Sure, it won't be decremental, but it seems like a waste of time for both parties.
– Joe
Feb 25 '14 at 21:19
3
It sounds to me like an effective interviewee tactic, to be honest; one of the first rules of interviewing is 'get your foot in the door', right?
– Joe
Feb 25 '14 at 21:56
1
chollida, I modified the title slightly to better match what you were asking - great question and welcome to The Workplace!
– Elysian Fields♦
Feb 26 '14 at 2:12
2
Does the person lip read? Are they hard to understand on the phone?
– Ian
Feb 26 '14 at 13:02
As a software developer, I hate technical phone screens (as the interviewer or the interviewee). Asking technical questions over the phone usually involves definitions or "name the library/method that you use when..." questions. These are the sort of questions that a CS undergrad could answer more easily than someone with years of experience in the field, and they fail to reflect the interviewee's abilities. That's not to mention that the answers can usually be found quickly using Google, which gives the advantage to interviewees who are willing to "cheat".
– Brian
Apr 22 '15 at 22:33
add a comment |Â
9
Presumably you have the phone screening phase to work out who you want to interview face-to-face, saving time in the long run. Sure, it won't be decremental, but it seems like a waste of time for both parties.
– Joe
Feb 25 '14 at 21:19
3
It sounds to me like an effective interviewee tactic, to be honest; one of the first rules of interviewing is 'get your foot in the door', right?
– Joe
Feb 25 '14 at 21:56
1
chollida, I modified the title slightly to better match what you were asking - great question and welcome to The Workplace!
– Elysian Fields♦
Feb 26 '14 at 2:12
2
Does the person lip read? Are they hard to understand on the phone?
– Ian
Feb 26 '14 at 13:02
As a software developer, I hate technical phone screens (as the interviewer or the interviewee). Asking technical questions over the phone usually involves definitions or "name the library/method that you use when..." questions. These are the sort of questions that a CS undergrad could answer more easily than someone with years of experience in the field, and they fail to reflect the interviewee's abilities. That's not to mention that the answers can usually be found quickly using Google, which gives the advantage to interviewees who are willing to "cheat".
– Brian
Apr 22 '15 at 22:33
9
9
Presumably you have the phone screening phase to work out who you want to interview face-to-face, saving time in the long run. Sure, it won't be decremental, but it seems like a waste of time for both parties.
– Joe
Feb 25 '14 at 21:19
Presumably you have the phone screening phase to work out who you want to interview face-to-face, saving time in the long run. Sure, it won't be decremental, but it seems like a waste of time for both parties.
– Joe
Feb 25 '14 at 21:19
3
3
It sounds to me like an effective interviewee tactic, to be honest; one of the first rules of interviewing is 'get your foot in the door', right?
– Joe
Feb 25 '14 at 21:56
It sounds to me like an effective interviewee tactic, to be honest; one of the first rules of interviewing is 'get your foot in the door', right?
– Joe
Feb 25 '14 at 21:56
1
1
chollida, I modified the title slightly to better match what you were asking - great question and welcome to The Workplace!
– Elysian Fields♦
Feb 26 '14 at 2:12
chollida, I modified the title slightly to better match what you were asking - great question and welcome to The Workplace!
– Elysian Fields♦
Feb 26 '14 at 2:12
2
2
Does the person lip read? Are they hard to understand on the phone?
– Ian
Feb 26 '14 at 13:02
Does the person lip read? Are they hard to understand on the phone?
– Ian
Feb 26 '14 at 13:02
As a software developer, I hate technical phone screens (as the interviewer or the interviewee). Asking technical questions over the phone usually involves definitions or "name the library/method that you use when..." questions. These are the sort of questions that a CS undergrad could answer more easily than someone with years of experience in the field, and they fail to reflect the interviewee's abilities. That's not to mention that the answers can usually be found quickly using Google, which gives the advantage to interviewees who are willing to "cheat".
– Brian
Apr 22 '15 at 22:33
As a software developer, I hate technical phone screens (as the interviewer or the interviewee). Asking technical questions over the phone usually involves definitions or "name the library/method that you use when..." questions. These are the sort of questions that a CS undergrad could answer more easily than someone with years of experience in the field, and they fail to reflect the interviewee's abilities. That's not to mention that the answers can usually be found quickly using Google, which gives the advantage to interviewees who are willing to "cheat".
– Brian
Apr 22 '15 at 22:33
add a comment |Â
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
Is there any downside that you can think of to doing an interview in
person if all the other candidates are done over the phone?
It's not a huge deal, but I can think of a few potential downside issues:
- You aren't conducting all the interviews in the same manner. Thus, you may be inclined to evaluate this candidate's "non-phone-screen" differently than the other "phone-screen" candidates. This could help or hurt the candidate. Most likely, the candidate thinks she/he will be gaining an advantage by requesting an in-person interview. That may or may not be so.
- For me, it takes more time to prep a location for an in-person interview, than a phone screen. I have to make sure the location is available and clean, get the candidate to sign in at the front desk, walk down to get him/her, escort the candidate to the proper location, then do the same in reverse on the way out.
- You are limiting the interviews to times when you are in the office. I sometimes do phone screens from home (and of course you would never invite a candidate into your home for interviews).
- Candidates sent in via an agency are often debriefed after the interview. What they learn is then used for the next candidate sent by the agency. So you can expect other candidates to start requesting in-person interviews, rather than phone screens. Consider if you want to set that as a precedent or not. Whatever accommodations you make for one candidate, you should make for the others.
- In some locales/contexts there my be legal issues with not treating all applicants identically. It might even open you up to potential discrimination lawsuits. Consult your HR department for guidance.
Again, not a big deal. For me though, I try to keep all the first-round screens as similar as I can, so I'd tend to require a phone screen unless there was a very convincing, unusual reason to do otherwise.
answered Feb 25 '14 at 21:30
Joe Strazzere
224k107661930
3
> So you can expect other candidates to start requesting in-person interviews, rather than phone screens. I did not think of this. Very good point.
– chollida
Feb 25 '14 at 21:41
1
There are also legal and equality issues depending on where you work. I'm aware that some government jobs have an appeals process, and if an interviewee is offered a non-standard interview process this could be an avenure for an unsuccessful candidate to dispute the decision.
– user9158
Feb 26 '14 at 4:40
@LegoStormtroopr I doubt that any government jobs will be using phone screens other than to ask basic questions ie are you a citizen and basic questions like that
– Pepone
Sep 18 '14 at 22:12
add a comment |Â
up vote
13
down vote
I would want to know the reason why he wants the in-house interview instead of the phone screen. If he is deaf and has difficulty understanding the questions when he can't lip read (or has some hearing loss that makes it particularly difficult to hear phone questions), that is entirely different from someone who wants to come in because he thinks it will give him a better shot at the position.
I would tend to grant this only in the case of a disability or personal situation that makes phone screening more difficult for the interviewee and thus putting him at a disadvantage over the other candidates.
answered Feb 26 '14 at 18:49
HLGEM
133k25227489
add a comment |Â
up vote
12
down vote
A large goal of a phone screen is to avoid having an on-site interview with someone that may not be a good fit. A great benefit of a 30-minute phone screen is that when the candidate is a disaster, you can go to Do you have any questions for us? at the twenty-minute mark, and be on to the other work you need to do after 25 minutes.
Having a candidate on-site is a greater investment of time and energy that I am willing to extend to those that you have good reason to believe are a good fit with the team.
answered Feb 25 '14 at 21:49
Eric Wilson
1,729812
Agreed. I think it's much easier to gracefully cut a phone screen short than an in-person interview.
– Carson63000
Feb 26 '14 at 0:17
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
I think it is a great deal more work to do an in-person interview. That includes questions like "Where will the interview be held?" and "Where is the bathroom?"
You will probably have to reserve a room which might not be difficult.
I do not think an in-person interview for a first-round gives a great deal of new info. Of course second round in-person interviews are the norm.
Whatever you decide to do, you have to do it for everyone.
edited Feb 26 '14 at 13:14
yoozer8
4,10442955
answered Feb 25 '14 at 22:14
Jim
1213
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
I see a very real downside - they know exactly what you look like and can now badger you at work.
I had a situation where an interviewee was doing very poorly, and when I interrupted him he banged both fist on the table and yelled at me not to interrupt him while he was talking and to let him finish answering the question. I stood up and ask "do you have any questions" as I walked to the door to get the HR person.
While nothing happened beyond a "can you believe that" story, I made sure I wasn't the last one out of the office that day. There's a 99% the guy just thinks he'll make a better impression on you, but a phone interview would have weeded out this guy, and avoided a really awkward situation.
answered Sep 17 '14 at 23:13
sevensevens
6,27121531
add a comment |Â
StackExchange.ready(function ()
$("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function ()
var showEditor = function()
$("#show-editor-button").hide();
$("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
;
var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
if(useFancy == 'True')
var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');
$(this).loadPopup(
url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
loaded: function(popup)
var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');
pTitle.text(popupTitle);
pBody.html(popupBody);
pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
)
else
var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true)
showEditor();
);
);
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
Is there any downside that you can think of to doing an interview in
person if all the other candidates are done over the phone?
It's not a huge deal, but I can think of a few potential downside issues:
- You aren't conducting all the interviews in the same manner. Thus, you may be inclined to evaluate this candidate's "non-phone-screen" differently than the other "phone-screen" candidates. This could help or hurt the candidate. Most likely, the candidate thinks she/he will be gaining an advantage by requesting an in-person interview. That may or may not be so.
- For me, it takes more time to prep a location for an in-person interview, than a phone screen. I have to make sure the location is available and clean, get the candidate to sign in at the front desk, walk down to get him/her, escort the candidate to the proper location, then do the same in reverse on the way out.
- You are limiting the interviews to times when you are in the office. I sometimes do phone screens from home (and of course you would never invite a candidate into your home for interviews).
- Candidates sent in via an agency are often debriefed after the interview. What they learn is then used for the next candidate sent by the agency. So you can expect other candidates to start requesting in-person interviews, rather than phone screens. Consider if you want to set that as a precedent or not. Whatever accommodations you make for one candidate, you should make for the others.
- In some locales/contexts there my be legal issues with not treating all applicants identically. It might even open you up to potential discrimination lawsuits. Consult your HR department for guidance.
Again, not a big deal. For me though, I try to keep all the first-round screens as similar as I can, so I'd tend to require a phone screen unless there was a very convincing, unusual reason to do otherwise.
answered Feb 25 '14 at 21:30
Joe Strazzere
224k107661930
3
> So you can expect other candidates to start requesting in-person interviews, rather than phone screens. I did not think of this. Very good point.
– chollida
Feb 25 '14 at 21:41
1
There are also legal and equality issues depending on where you work. I'm aware that some government jobs have an appeals process, and if an interviewee is offered a non-standard interview process this could be an avenure for an unsuccessful candidate to dispute the decision.
– user9158
Feb 26 '14 at 4:40
@LegoStormtroopr I doubt that any government jobs will be using phone screens other than to ask basic questions ie are you a citizen and basic questions like that
– Pepone
Sep 18 '14 at 22:12
add a comment |Â
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
Is there any downside that you can think of to doing an interview in
person if all the other candidates are done over the phone?
It's not a huge deal, but I can think of a few potential downside issues:
- You aren't conducting all the interviews in the same manner. Thus, you may be inclined to evaluate this candidate's "non-phone-screen" differently than the other "phone-screen" candidates. This could help or hurt the candidate. Most likely, the candidate thinks she/he will be gaining an advantage by requesting an in-person interview. That may or may not be so.
- For me, it takes more time to prep a location for an in-person interview, than a phone screen. I have to make sure the location is available and clean, get the candidate to sign in at the front desk, walk down to get him/her, escort the candidate to the proper location, then do the same in reverse on the way out.
- You are limiting the interviews to times when you are in the office. I sometimes do phone screens from home (and of course you would never invite a candidate into your home for interviews).
- Candidates sent in via an agency are often debriefed after the interview. What they learn is then used for the next candidate sent by the agency. So you can expect other candidates to start requesting in-person interviews, rather than phone screens. Consider if you want to set that as a precedent or not. Whatever accommodations you make for one candidate, you should make for the others.
- In some locales/contexts there my be legal issues with not treating all applicants identically. It might even open you up to potential discrimination lawsuits. Consult your HR department for guidance.
Again, not a big deal. For me though, I try to keep all the first-round screens as similar as I can, so I'd tend to require a phone screen unless there was a very convincing, unusual reason to do otherwise.
answered Feb 25 '14 at 21:30
Joe Strazzere
224k107661930
3
> So you can expect other candidates to start requesting in-person interviews, rather than phone screens. I did not think of this. Very good point.
– chollida
Feb 25 '14 at 21:41
1
There are also legal and equality issues depending on where you work. I'm aware that some government jobs have an appeals process, and if an interviewee is offered a non-standard interview process this could be an avenure for an unsuccessful candidate to dispute the decision.
– user9158
Feb 26 '14 at 4:40
@LegoStormtroopr I doubt that any government jobs will be using phone screens other than to ask basic questions ie are you a citizen and basic questions like that
– Pepone
Sep 18 '14 at 22:12
add a comment |Â
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
Is there any downside that you can think of to doing an interview in
person if all the other candidates are done over the phone?
It's not a huge deal, but I can think of a few potential downside issues:
- You aren't conducting all the interviews in the same manner. Thus, you may be inclined to evaluate this candidate's "non-phone-screen" differently than the other "phone-screen" candidates. This could help or hurt the candidate. Most likely, the candidate thinks she/he will be gaining an advantage by requesting an in-person interview. That may or may not be so.
- For me, it takes more time to prep a location for an in-person interview, than a phone screen. I have to make sure the location is available and clean, get the candidate to sign in at the front desk, walk down to get him/her, escort the candidate to the proper location, then do the same in reverse on the way out.
- You are limiting the interviews to times when you are in the office. I sometimes do phone screens from home (and of course you would never invite a candidate into your home for interviews).
- Candidates sent in via an agency are often debriefed after the interview. What they learn is then used for the next candidate sent by the agency. So you can expect other candidates to start requesting in-person interviews, rather than phone screens. Consider if you want to set that as a precedent or not. Whatever accommodations you make for one candidate, you should make for the others.
- In some locales/contexts there my be legal issues with not treating all applicants identically. It might even open you up to potential discrimination lawsuits. Consult your HR department for guidance.
Again, not a big deal. For me though, I try to keep all the first-round screens as similar as I can, so I'd tend to require a phone screen unless there was a very convincing, unusual reason to do otherwise.
answered Feb 25 '14 at 21:30
Joe Strazzere
224k107661930
Is there any downside that you can think of to doing an interview in
person if all the other candidates are done over the phone?
It's not a huge deal, but I can think of a few potential downside issues:
- You aren't conducting all the interviews in the same manner. Thus, you may be inclined to evaluate this candidate's "non-phone-screen" differently than the other "phone-screen" candidates. This could help or hurt the candidate. Most likely, the candidate thinks she/he will be gaining an advantage by requesting an in-person interview. That may or may not be so.
- For me, it takes more time to prep a location for an in-person interview, than a phone screen. I have to make sure the location is available and clean, get the candidate to sign in at the front desk, walk down to get him/her, escort the candidate to the proper location, then do the same in reverse on the way out.
- You are limiting the interviews to times when you are in the office. I sometimes do phone screens from home (and of course you would never invite a candidate into your home for interviews).
- Candidates sent in via an agency are often debriefed after the interview. What they learn is then used for the next candidate sent by the agency. So you can expect other candidates to start requesting in-person interviews, rather than phone screens. Consider if you want to set that as a precedent or not. Whatever accommodations you make for one candidate, you should make for the others.
- In some locales/contexts there my be legal issues with not treating all applicants identically. It might even open you up to potential discrimination lawsuits. Consult your HR department for guidance.
Again, not a big deal. For me though, I try to keep all the first-round screens as similar as I can, so I'd tend to require a phone screen unless there was a very convincing, unusual reason to do otherwise.
answered Feb 25 '14 at 21:30
Joe Strazzere
224k107661930
edited Mar 20 '15 at 16:52
answered Feb 25 '14 at 21:30
Joe Strazzere
224k107661930
answered Feb 25 '14 at 21:30
Joe Strazzere
224k107661930
answered Feb 25 '14 at 21:30
Joe Strazzere
224k107661930
224k107661930
3
> So you can expect other candidates to start requesting in-person interviews, rather than phone screens. I did not think of this. Very good point.
– chollida
Feb 25 '14 at 21:41
1
There are also legal and equality issues depending on where you work. I'm aware that some government jobs have an appeals process, and if an interviewee is offered a non-standard interview process this could be an avenure for an unsuccessful candidate to dispute the decision.
– user9158
Feb 26 '14 at 4:40
@LegoStormtroopr I doubt that any government jobs will be using phone screens other than to ask basic questions ie are you a citizen and basic questions like that
– Pepone
Sep 18 '14 at 22:12
add a comment |Â
3
> So you can expect other candidates to start requesting in-person interviews, rather than phone screens. I did not think of this. Very good point.
– chollida
Feb 25 '14 at 21:41
1
There are also legal and equality issues depending on where you work. I'm aware that some government jobs have an appeals process, and if an interviewee is offered a non-standard interview process this could be an avenure for an unsuccessful candidate to dispute the decision.
– user9158
Feb 26 '14 at 4:40
@LegoStormtroopr I doubt that any government jobs will be using phone screens other than to ask basic questions ie are you a citizen and basic questions like that
– Pepone
Sep 18 '14 at 22:12
3
3
> So you can expect other candidates to start requesting in-person interviews, rather than phone screens. I did not think of this. Very good point.
– chollida
Feb 25 '14 at 21:41
> So you can expect other candidates to start requesting in-person interviews, rather than phone screens. I did not think of this. Very good point.
– chollida
Feb 25 '14 at 21:41
1
1
There are also legal and equality issues depending on where you work. I'm aware that some government jobs have an appeals process, and if an interviewee is offered a non-standard interview process this could be an avenure for an unsuccessful candidate to dispute the decision.
– user9158
Feb 26 '14 at 4:40
There are also legal and equality issues depending on where you work. I'm aware that some government jobs have an appeals process, and if an interviewee is offered a non-standard interview process this could be an avenure for an unsuccessful candidate to dispute the decision.
– user9158
Feb 26 '14 at 4:40
@LegoStormtroopr I doubt that any government jobs will be using phone screens other than to ask basic questions ie are you a citizen and basic questions like that
– Pepone
Sep 18 '14 at 22:12
@LegoStormtroopr I doubt that any government jobs will be using phone screens other than to ask basic questions ie are you a citizen and basic questions like that
– Pepone
Sep 18 '14 at 22:12
add a comment |Â
up vote
13
down vote
I would want to know the reason why he wants the in-house interview instead of the phone screen. If he is deaf and has difficulty understanding the questions when he can't lip read (or has some hearing loss that makes it particularly difficult to hear phone questions), that is entirely different from someone who wants to come in because he thinks it will give him a better shot at the position.
I would tend to grant this only in the case of a disability or personal situation that makes phone screening more difficult for the interviewee and thus putting him at a disadvantage over the other candidates.
answered Feb 26 '14 at 18:49
HLGEM
133k25227489
add a comment |Â
up vote
13
down vote
I would want to know the reason why he wants the in-house interview instead of the phone screen. If he is deaf and has difficulty understanding the questions when he can't lip read (or has some hearing loss that makes it particularly difficult to hear phone questions), that is entirely different from someone who wants to come in because he thinks it will give him a better shot at the position.
I would tend to grant this only in the case of a disability or personal situation that makes phone screening more difficult for the interviewee and thus putting him at a disadvantage over the other candidates.
answered Feb 26 '14 at 18:49
HLGEM
133k25227489
add a comment |Â
up vote
13
down vote
up vote
13
down vote
I would want to know the reason why he wants the in-house interview instead of the phone screen. If he is deaf and has difficulty understanding the questions when he can't lip read (or has some hearing loss that makes it particularly difficult to hear phone questions), that is entirely different from someone who wants to come in because he thinks it will give him a better shot at the position.
I would tend to grant this only in the case of a disability or personal situation that makes phone screening more difficult for the interviewee and thus putting him at a disadvantage over the other candidates.
answered Feb 26 '14 at 18:49
HLGEM
133k25227489
I would want to know the reason why he wants the in-house interview instead of the phone screen. If he is deaf and has difficulty understanding the questions when he can't lip read (or has some hearing loss that makes it particularly difficult to hear phone questions), that is entirely different from someone who wants to come in because he thinks it will give him a better shot at the position.
I would tend to grant this only in the case of a disability or personal situation that makes phone screening more difficult for the interviewee and thus putting him at a disadvantage over the other candidates.
answered Feb 26 '14 at 18:49
HLGEM
133k25227489
answered Feb 26 '14 at 18:49
HLGEM
133k25227489
answered Feb 26 '14 at 18:49
HLGEM
133k25227489
answered Feb 26 '14 at 18:49
HLGEM
133k25227489
133k25227489
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
12
down vote
A large goal of a phone screen is to avoid having an on-site interview with someone that may not be a good fit. A great benefit of a 30-minute phone screen is that when the candidate is a disaster, you can go to Do you have any questions for us? at the twenty-minute mark, and be on to the other work you need to do after 25 minutes.
Having a candidate on-site is a greater investment of time and energy that I am willing to extend to those that you have good reason to believe are a good fit with the team.
answered Feb 25 '14 at 21:49
Eric Wilson
1,729812
Agreed. I think it's much easier to gracefully cut a phone screen short than an in-person interview.
– Carson63000
Feb 26 '14 at 0:17
add a comment |Â
up vote
12
down vote
A large goal of a phone screen is to avoid having an on-site interview with someone that may not be a good fit. A great benefit of a 30-minute phone screen is that when the candidate is a disaster, you can go to Do you have any questions for us? at the twenty-minute mark, and be on to the other work you need to do after 25 minutes.
Having a candidate on-site is a greater investment of time and energy that I am willing to extend to those that you have good reason to believe are a good fit with the team.
answered Feb 25 '14 at 21:49
Eric Wilson
1,729812
Agreed. I think it's much easier to gracefully cut a phone screen short than an in-person interview.
– Carson63000
Feb 26 '14 at 0:17
add a comment |Â
up vote
12
down vote
up vote
12
down vote
A large goal of a phone screen is to avoid having an on-site interview with someone that may not be a good fit. A great benefit of a 30-minute phone screen is that when the candidate is a disaster, you can go to Do you have any questions for us? at the twenty-minute mark, and be on to the other work you need to do after 25 minutes.
Having a candidate on-site is a greater investment of time and energy that I am willing to extend to those that you have good reason to believe are a good fit with the team.
answered Feb 25 '14 at 21:49
Eric Wilson
1,729812
A large goal of a phone screen is to avoid having an on-site interview with someone that may not be a good fit. A great benefit of a 30-minute phone screen is that when the candidate is a disaster, you can go to Do you have any questions for us? at the twenty-minute mark, and be on to the other work you need to do after 25 minutes.
Having a candidate on-site is a greater investment of time and energy that I am willing to extend to those that you have good reason to believe are a good fit with the team.
answered Feb 25 '14 at 21:49
Eric Wilson
1,729812
edited Feb 26 '14 at 0:45
answered Feb 25 '14 at 21:49
Eric Wilson
1,729812
answered Feb 25 '14 at 21:49
Eric Wilson
1,729812
answered Feb 25 '14 at 21:49
Eric Wilson
1,729812
1,729812
Agreed. I think it's much easier to gracefully cut a phone screen short than an in-person interview.
– Carson63000
Feb 26 '14 at 0:17
add a comment |Â
Agreed. I think it's much easier to gracefully cut a phone screen short than an in-person interview.
– Carson63000
Feb 26 '14 at 0:17
Agreed. I think it's much easier to gracefully cut a phone screen short than an in-person interview.
– Carson63000
Feb 26 '14 at 0:17
Agreed. I think it's much easier to gracefully cut a phone screen short than an in-person interview.
– Carson63000
Feb 26 '14 at 0:17
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
I think it is a great deal more work to do an in-person interview. That includes questions like "Where will the interview be held?" and "Where is the bathroom?"
You will probably have to reserve a room which might not be difficult.
I do not think an in-person interview for a first-round gives a great deal of new info. Of course second round in-person interviews are the norm.
Whatever you decide to do, you have to do it for everyone.
edited Feb 26 '14 at 13:14
yoozer8
4,10442955
answered Feb 25 '14 at 22:14
Jim
1213
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
I think it is a great deal more work to do an in-person interview. That includes questions like "Where will the interview be held?" and "Where is the bathroom?"
You will probably have to reserve a room which might not be difficult.
I do not think an in-person interview for a first-round gives a great deal of new info. Of course second round in-person interviews are the norm.
Whatever you decide to do, you have to do it for everyone.
edited Feb 26 '14 at 13:14
yoozer8
4,10442955
answered Feb 25 '14 at 22:14
Jim
1213
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
I think it is a great deal more work to do an in-person interview. That includes questions like "Where will the interview be held?" and "Where is the bathroom?"
You will probably have to reserve a room which might not be difficult.
I do not think an in-person interview for a first-round gives a great deal of new info. Of course second round in-person interviews are the norm.
Whatever you decide to do, you have to do it for everyone.
edited Feb 26 '14 at 13:14
yoozer8
4,10442955
answered Feb 25 '14 at 22:14
Jim
1213
I think it is a great deal more work to do an in-person interview. That includes questions like "Where will the interview be held?" and "Where is the bathroom?"
You will probably have to reserve a room which might not be difficult.
I do not think an in-person interview for a first-round gives a great deal of new info. Of course second round in-person interviews are the norm.
Whatever you decide to do, you have to do it for everyone.
edited Feb 26 '14 at 13:14
yoozer8
4,10442955
answered Feb 25 '14 at 22:14
Jim
1213
edited Feb 26 '14 at 13:14
yoozer8
4,10442955
edited Feb 26 '14 at 13:14
yoozer8
4,10442955
edited Feb 26 '14 at 13:14
yoozer8
4,10442955
4,10442955
answered Feb 25 '14 at 22:14
Jim
1213
answered Feb 25 '14 at 22:14
Jim
1213
answered Feb 25 '14 at 22:14
Jim
1213
1213
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
I see a very real downside - they know exactly what you look like and can now badger you at work.
I had a situation where an interviewee was doing very poorly, and when I interrupted him he banged both fist on the table and yelled at me not to interrupt him while he was talking and to let him finish answering the question. I stood up and ask "do you have any questions" as I walked to the door to get the HR person.
While nothing happened beyond a "can you believe that" story, I made sure I wasn't the last one out of the office that day. There's a 99% the guy just thinks he'll make a better impression on you, but a phone interview would have weeded out this guy, and avoided a really awkward situation.
answered Sep 17 '14 at 23:13
sevensevens
6,27121531
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
I see a very real downside - they know exactly what you look like and can now badger you at work.
I had a situation where an interviewee was doing very poorly, and when I interrupted him he banged both fist on the table and yelled at me not to interrupt him while he was talking and to let him finish answering the question. I stood up and ask "do you have any questions" as I walked to the door to get the HR person.
While nothing happened beyond a "can you believe that" story, I made sure I wasn't the last one out of the office that day. There's a 99% the guy just thinks he'll make a better impression on you, but a phone interview would have weeded out this guy, and avoided a really awkward situation.
answered Sep 17 '14 at 23:13
sevensevens
6,27121531
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
I see a very real downside - they know exactly what you look like and can now badger you at work.
I had a situation where an interviewee was doing very poorly, and when I interrupted him he banged both fist on the table and yelled at me not to interrupt him while he was talking and to let him finish answering the question. I stood up and ask "do you have any questions" as I walked to the door to get the HR person.
While nothing happened beyond a "can you believe that" story, I made sure I wasn't the last one out of the office that day. There's a 99% the guy just thinks he'll make a better impression on you, but a phone interview would have weeded out this guy, and avoided a really awkward situation.
answered Sep 17 '14 at 23:13
sevensevens
6,27121531
I see a very real downside - they know exactly what you look like and can now badger you at work.
I had a situation where an interviewee was doing very poorly, and when I interrupted him he banged both fist on the table and yelled at me not to interrupt him while he was talking and to let him finish answering the question. I stood up and ask "do you have any questions" as I walked to the door to get the HR person.
While nothing happened beyond a "can you believe that" story, I made sure I wasn't the last one out of the office that day. There's a 99% the guy just thinks he'll make a better impression on you, but a phone interview would have weeded out this guy, and avoided a really awkward situation.
answered Sep 17 '14 at 23:13
sevensevens
6,27121531
answered Sep 17 '14 at 23:13
sevensevens
6,27121531
answered Sep 17 '14 at 23:13
sevensevens
6,27121531
answered Sep 17 '14 at 23:13
sevensevens
6,27121531
6,27121531
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f19715%2fwhat-factors-should-i-consider-when-a-candidate-asks-to-do-a-phone-screen-in-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
9
Presumably you have the phone screening phase to work out who you want to interview face-to-face, saving time in the long run. Sure, it won't be decremental, but it seems like a waste of time for both parties.
– Joe
Feb 25 '14 at 21:19
3
It sounds to me like an effective interviewee tactic, to be honest; one of the first rules of interviewing is 'get your foot in the door', right?
– Joe
Feb 25 '14 at 21:56
1
chollida, I modified the title slightly to better match what you were asking - great question and welcome to The Workplace!
– Elysian Fields♦
Feb 26 '14 at 2:12
2
Does the person lip read? Are they hard to understand on the phone?
– Ian
Feb 26 '14 at 13:02
As a software developer, I hate technical phone screens (as the interviewer or the interviewee). Asking technical questions over the phone usually involves definitions or "name the library/method that you use when..." questions. These are the sort of questions that a CS undergrad could answer more easily than someone with years of experience in the field, and they fail to reflect the interviewee's abilities. That's not to mention that the answers can usually be found quickly using Google, which gives the advantage to interviewees who are willing to "cheat".
– Brian
Apr 22 '15 at 22:33