Is hackerrank useful as a screening tool? [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
3
down vote

favorite












This question may well be too subjective for SE, but I'm going to try. Help me make it more focused and objective if possible.



I'm writing from the perspective of a job candidate, but I'm interested in answers from either side of the fence.



In the last 3 months, I've been applying for a very large number of jobs. Many of the companies (probably the best of them) have asked me to complete some form of programming assignment. Some were timed, some were live, some were open-ended. Two of the timed ones used hackerrank.



As a job candidate, my experience with hackerrank has been abysmal. I utterly failed the hackerrank tests--not because I got the answers wrong, but because the time ran out before I even figured out how to use the !@#$ interface, what input format was being fed to my subroutine, and where STDERR went, etc.



Compare this to my non-hackerrank tests, and I've been very well received by job recruiters. Google flew me to Mountain View (ultimately they didn't offer me a job, though), and multiple other companies have said they liked my coding, and to date, 3 others (not counting Google) have invited me for on-site interviews.



So I'm pretty sure that the problem isn't simply that my "code test taking" ability isn't there.



Back to hackerrank. I'm sure that I could solve my problems with hackerrank if I spent sufficient time just using the site and learning its nuances, expectations and bugs.



So my question is, is hackerrank actually useful as a job recruiting tool?



As a job candidate, is it worth it to learn the system? Or should I consider hackerrank tests the same way I would consider a large number of IT certifications: GIGO. (And by extension, I likely don't want to work for a company that uses it as a criteria, even if I did pass.)



As a job recruiter, is it valuable? Does it truly filter out "bad" candidates? Or does it filter out good candidates who just don't test well because they haven't spent the requisite hours learning hackerrank?







share|improve this question












closed as primarily opinion-based by Jane S♦, scaaahu, gnat, yochannah, Masked Man♦ Jul 17 '15 at 8:56


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 4




    Well, their editor is locking up in Chrome, which is enough to make me write them off as irrelevant... (Cute concept. I presume they're hoping to sell lists of pre-screened applicants. But I can immediately see about 6 ways to game their system...)
    – keshlam
    Jul 16 '15 at 22:00






  • 2




    Ask your recruiters. Don't ask us.
    – Vietnhi Phuvan
    Jul 17 '15 at 2:21






  • 1




    Ask three recruiters, get four answers. Voting to close as primarily opinion based!
    – Jane S♦
    Jul 17 '15 at 2:28










  • Anecdotally: I got a job after completing a hackerrank test. Didn't like it. Leaving next week. And yeah, the site itself was the biggest problem - if I hadn't pre-prepared, I wouldn't have been able to figure out how to do the test in time. Despite all this, I'm not sure this could be made non-subjective, and/or anything but a hacker rank bashing post, so voting to close.
    – yochannah
    Jul 17 '15 at 7:32










  • @yochannah: Why didn't you like it? Is your reason for leaving in any way related to or predictable by their use of hackerrank?
    – Flimzy
    Jul 17 '15 at 13:27
















up vote
3
down vote

favorite












This question may well be too subjective for SE, but I'm going to try. Help me make it more focused and objective if possible.



I'm writing from the perspective of a job candidate, but I'm interested in answers from either side of the fence.



In the last 3 months, I've been applying for a very large number of jobs. Many of the companies (probably the best of them) have asked me to complete some form of programming assignment. Some were timed, some were live, some were open-ended. Two of the timed ones used hackerrank.



As a job candidate, my experience with hackerrank has been abysmal. I utterly failed the hackerrank tests--not because I got the answers wrong, but because the time ran out before I even figured out how to use the !@#$ interface, what input format was being fed to my subroutine, and where STDERR went, etc.



Compare this to my non-hackerrank tests, and I've been very well received by job recruiters. Google flew me to Mountain View (ultimately they didn't offer me a job, though), and multiple other companies have said they liked my coding, and to date, 3 others (not counting Google) have invited me for on-site interviews.



So I'm pretty sure that the problem isn't simply that my "code test taking" ability isn't there.



Back to hackerrank. I'm sure that I could solve my problems with hackerrank if I spent sufficient time just using the site and learning its nuances, expectations and bugs.



So my question is, is hackerrank actually useful as a job recruiting tool?



As a job candidate, is it worth it to learn the system? Or should I consider hackerrank tests the same way I would consider a large number of IT certifications: GIGO. (And by extension, I likely don't want to work for a company that uses it as a criteria, even if I did pass.)



As a job recruiter, is it valuable? Does it truly filter out "bad" candidates? Or does it filter out good candidates who just don't test well because they haven't spent the requisite hours learning hackerrank?







share|improve this question












closed as primarily opinion-based by Jane S♦, scaaahu, gnat, yochannah, Masked Man♦ Jul 17 '15 at 8:56


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 4




    Well, their editor is locking up in Chrome, which is enough to make me write them off as irrelevant... (Cute concept. I presume they're hoping to sell lists of pre-screened applicants. But I can immediately see about 6 ways to game their system...)
    – keshlam
    Jul 16 '15 at 22:00






  • 2




    Ask your recruiters. Don't ask us.
    – Vietnhi Phuvan
    Jul 17 '15 at 2:21






  • 1




    Ask three recruiters, get four answers. Voting to close as primarily opinion based!
    – Jane S♦
    Jul 17 '15 at 2:28










  • Anecdotally: I got a job after completing a hackerrank test. Didn't like it. Leaving next week. And yeah, the site itself was the biggest problem - if I hadn't pre-prepared, I wouldn't have been able to figure out how to do the test in time. Despite all this, I'm not sure this could be made non-subjective, and/or anything but a hacker rank bashing post, so voting to close.
    – yochannah
    Jul 17 '15 at 7:32










  • @yochannah: Why didn't you like it? Is your reason for leaving in any way related to or predictable by their use of hackerrank?
    – Flimzy
    Jul 17 '15 at 13:27












up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











This question may well be too subjective for SE, but I'm going to try. Help me make it more focused and objective if possible.



I'm writing from the perspective of a job candidate, but I'm interested in answers from either side of the fence.



In the last 3 months, I've been applying for a very large number of jobs. Many of the companies (probably the best of them) have asked me to complete some form of programming assignment. Some were timed, some were live, some were open-ended. Two of the timed ones used hackerrank.



As a job candidate, my experience with hackerrank has been abysmal. I utterly failed the hackerrank tests--not because I got the answers wrong, but because the time ran out before I even figured out how to use the !@#$ interface, what input format was being fed to my subroutine, and where STDERR went, etc.



Compare this to my non-hackerrank tests, and I've been very well received by job recruiters. Google flew me to Mountain View (ultimately they didn't offer me a job, though), and multiple other companies have said they liked my coding, and to date, 3 others (not counting Google) have invited me for on-site interviews.



So I'm pretty sure that the problem isn't simply that my "code test taking" ability isn't there.



Back to hackerrank. I'm sure that I could solve my problems with hackerrank if I spent sufficient time just using the site and learning its nuances, expectations and bugs.



So my question is, is hackerrank actually useful as a job recruiting tool?



As a job candidate, is it worth it to learn the system? Or should I consider hackerrank tests the same way I would consider a large number of IT certifications: GIGO. (And by extension, I likely don't want to work for a company that uses it as a criteria, even if I did pass.)



As a job recruiter, is it valuable? Does it truly filter out "bad" candidates? Or does it filter out good candidates who just don't test well because they haven't spent the requisite hours learning hackerrank?







share|improve this question












This question may well be too subjective for SE, but I'm going to try. Help me make it more focused and objective if possible.



I'm writing from the perspective of a job candidate, but I'm interested in answers from either side of the fence.



In the last 3 months, I've been applying for a very large number of jobs. Many of the companies (probably the best of them) have asked me to complete some form of programming assignment. Some were timed, some were live, some were open-ended. Two of the timed ones used hackerrank.



As a job candidate, my experience with hackerrank has been abysmal. I utterly failed the hackerrank tests--not because I got the answers wrong, but because the time ran out before I even figured out how to use the !@#$ interface, what input format was being fed to my subroutine, and where STDERR went, etc.



Compare this to my non-hackerrank tests, and I've been very well received by job recruiters. Google flew me to Mountain View (ultimately they didn't offer me a job, though), and multiple other companies have said they liked my coding, and to date, 3 others (not counting Google) have invited me for on-site interviews.



So I'm pretty sure that the problem isn't simply that my "code test taking" ability isn't there.



Back to hackerrank. I'm sure that I could solve my problems with hackerrank if I spent sufficient time just using the site and learning its nuances, expectations and bugs.



So my question is, is hackerrank actually useful as a job recruiting tool?



As a job candidate, is it worth it to learn the system? Or should I consider hackerrank tests the same way I would consider a large number of IT certifications: GIGO. (And by extension, I likely don't want to work for a company that uses it as a criteria, even if I did pass.)



As a job recruiter, is it valuable? Does it truly filter out "bad" candidates? Or does it filter out good candidates who just don't test well because they haven't spent the requisite hours learning hackerrank?









share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jul 16 '15 at 21:32









Flimzy

13717




13717




closed as primarily opinion-based by Jane S♦, scaaahu, gnat, yochannah, Masked Man♦ Jul 17 '15 at 8:56


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






closed as primarily opinion-based by Jane S♦, scaaahu, gnat, yochannah, Masked Man♦ Jul 17 '15 at 8:56


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 4




    Well, their editor is locking up in Chrome, which is enough to make me write them off as irrelevant... (Cute concept. I presume they're hoping to sell lists of pre-screened applicants. But I can immediately see about 6 ways to game their system...)
    – keshlam
    Jul 16 '15 at 22:00






  • 2




    Ask your recruiters. Don't ask us.
    – Vietnhi Phuvan
    Jul 17 '15 at 2:21






  • 1




    Ask three recruiters, get four answers. Voting to close as primarily opinion based!
    – Jane S♦
    Jul 17 '15 at 2:28










  • Anecdotally: I got a job after completing a hackerrank test. Didn't like it. Leaving next week. And yeah, the site itself was the biggest problem - if I hadn't pre-prepared, I wouldn't have been able to figure out how to do the test in time. Despite all this, I'm not sure this could be made non-subjective, and/or anything but a hacker rank bashing post, so voting to close.
    – yochannah
    Jul 17 '15 at 7:32










  • @yochannah: Why didn't you like it? Is your reason for leaving in any way related to or predictable by their use of hackerrank?
    – Flimzy
    Jul 17 '15 at 13:27












  • 4




    Well, their editor is locking up in Chrome, which is enough to make me write them off as irrelevant... (Cute concept. I presume they're hoping to sell lists of pre-screened applicants. But I can immediately see about 6 ways to game their system...)
    – keshlam
    Jul 16 '15 at 22:00






  • 2




    Ask your recruiters. Don't ask us.
    – Vietnhi Phuvan
    Jul 17 '15 at 2:21






  • 1




    Ask three recruiters, get four answers. Voting to close as primarily opinion based!
    – Jane S♦
    Jul 17 '15 at 2:28










  • Anecdotally: I got a job after completing a hackerrank test. Didn't like it. Leaving next week. And yeah, the site itself was the biggest problem - if I hadn't pre-prepared, I wouldn't have been able to figure out how to do the test in time. Despite all this, I'm not sure this could be made non-subjective, and/or anything but a hacker rank bashing post, so voting to close.
    – yochannah
    Jul 17 '15 at 7:32










  • @yochannah: Why didn't you like it? Is your reason for leaving in any way related to or predictable by their use of hackerrank?
    – Flimzy
    Jul 17 '15 at 13:27







4




4




Well, their editor is locking up in Chrome, which is enough to make me write them off as irrelevant... (Cute concept. I presume they're hoping to sell lists of pre-screened applicants. But I can immediately see about 6 ways to game their system...)
– keshlam
Jul 16 '15 at 22:00




Well, their editor is locking up in Chrome, which is enough to make me write them off as irrelevant... (Cute concept. I presume they're hoping to sell lists of pre-screened applicants. But I can immediately see about 6 ways to game their system...)
– keshlam
Jul 16 '15 at 22:00




2




2




Ask your recruiters. Don't ask us.
– Vietnhi Phuvan
Jul 17 '15 at 2:21




Ask your recruiters. Don't ask us.
– Vietnhi Phuvan
Jul 17 '15 at 2:21




1




1




Ask three recruiters, get four answers. Voting to close as primarily opinion based!
– Jane S♦
Jul 17 '15 at 2:28




Ask three recruiters, get four answers. Voting to close as primarily opinion based!
– Jane S♦
Jul 17 '15 at 2:28












Anecdotally: I got a job after completing a hackerrank test. Didn't like it. Leaving next week. And yeah, the site itself was the biggest problem - if I hadn't pre-prepared, I wouldn't have been able to figure out how to do the test in time. Despite all this, I'm not sure this could be made non-subjective, and/or anything but a hacker rank bashing post, so voting to close.
– yochannah
Jul 17 '15 at 7:32




Anecdotally: I got a job after completing a hackerrank test. Didn't like it. Leaving next week. And yeah, the site itself was the biggest problem - if I hadn't pre-prepared, I wouldn't have been able to figure out how to do the test in time. Despite all this, I'm not sure this could be made non-subjective, and/or anything but a hacker rank bashing post, so voting to close.
– yochannah
Jul 17 '15 at 7:32












@yochannah: Why didn't you like it? Is your reason for leaving in any way related to or predictable by their use of hackerrank?
– Flimzy
Jul 17 '15 at 13:27




@yochannah: Why didn't you like it? Is your reason for leaving in any way related to or predictable by their use of hackerrank?
– Flimzy
Jul 17 '15 at 13:27










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote














So my question is, is hackerrank actually useful as a job recruiting tool?




Regardless of what we think, the question you need to answer is: do recruiters that offer jobs you want use it? If so, that's the hoop you have to jump through to get the job. Just another part of the application process you may or may not like. Like the dress code for the on site interview.






share|improve this answer




















  • Indeed. It's two sides to the same coin. That's why I've asked about both sides of the issue in my question. This feels to me like a simple re-statement of the question, rather than an answer.
    – Flimzy
    Jul 17 '15 at 13:26

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote














So my question is, is hackerrank actually useful as a job recruiting tool?




Regardless of what we think, the question you need to answer is: do recruiters that offer jobs you want use it? If so, that's the hoop you have to jump through to get the job. Just another part of the application process you may or may not like. Like the dress code for the on site interview.






share|improve this answer




















  • Indeed. It's two sides to the same coin. That's why I've asked about both sides of the issue in my question. This feels to me like a simple re-statement of the question, rather than an answer.
    – Flimzy
    Jul 17 '15 at 13:26














up vote
2
down vote














So my question is, is hackerrank actually useful as a job recruiting tool?




Regardless of what we think, the question you need to answer is: do recruiters that offer jobs you want use it? If so, that's the hoop you have to jump through to get the job. Just another part of the application process you may or may not like. Like the dress code for the on site interview.






share|improve this answer




















  • Indeed. It's two sides to the same coin. That's why I've asked about both sides of the issue in my question. This feels to me like a simple re-statement of the question, rather than an answer.
    – Flimzy
    Jul 17 '15 at 13:26












up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote










So my question is, is hackerrank actually useful as a job recruiting tool?




Regardless of what we think, the question you need to answer is: do recruiters that offer jobs you want use it? If so, that's the hoop you have to jump through to get the job. Just another part of the application process you may or may not like. Like the dress code for the on site interview.






share|improve this answer













So my question is, is hackerrank actually useful as a job recruiting tool?




Regardless of what we think, the question you need to answer is: do recruiters that offer jobs you want use it? If so, that's the hoop you have to jump through to get the job. Just another part of the application process you may or may not like. Like the dress code for the on site interview.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jul 17 '15 at 5:49









nvoigt

42.6k18105147




42.6k18105147











  • Indeed. It's two sides to the same coin. That's why I've asked about both sides of the issue in my question. This feels to me like a simple re-statement of the question, rather than an answer.
    – Flimzy
    Jul 17 '15 at 13:26
















  • Indeed. It's two sides to the same coin. That's why I've asked about both sides of the issue in my question. This feels to me like a simple re-statement of the question, rather than an answer.
    – Flimzy
    Jul 17 '15 at 13:26















Indeed. It's two sides to the same coin. That's why I've asked about both sides of the issue in my question. This feels to me like a simple re-statement of the question, rather than an answer.
– Flimzy
Jul 17 '15 at 13:26




Indeed. It's two sides to the same coin. That's why I've asked about both sides of the issue in my question. This feels to me like a simple re-statement of the question, rather than an answer.
– Flimzy
Jul 17 '15 at 13:26


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What does second last employer means? [closed]

List of Gilmore Girls characters

One-line joke