Mixing
![Vacation time-requested, got it, paid for it (non-refundable), vacation canceled by employer [closed]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgjbpfN9tAutmK93bJRC3ZoROZzi2TJDms5n8_qJuhgE0a9b52OOHayv3NGT8igAdFL7byXNst-_1DZK5SjrIJ28_6RQPUpBROqMs5s6jo-ZsjX8kjDwfxJufIitH3TaQRXWaGSQKRQib-f/s72-c/1.jpg)
Informing customers about the death of an employee
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
53
down vote
favorite
If you have an employee who has an impersonal, but professional relationship with some of your customers (say, an account manager or a sales representative) and the employee passes away unexpectedly, should you inform your customers that they have passed? Or should you just treat the situation as if they have moved on from the company?
My personal preference is not to burden the customer with the knowledge - just keep it to
Sorry, $x is no longer with us. $y has taken over their role, so I will pass you on to them.
(which is the standard script for when an employee quits/fired). Then if asked why, I will then mention that the person has passed away, but not give any more details unless again asked.
Is there another way of handling the situation?
customer-service death
edited Apr 10 '17 at 11:47
Konerak
2,57711426
asked Feb 16 '14 at 23:22
Mark Henderson
5531523
add a comment |Â
up vote
53
down vote
favorite
If you have an employee who has an impersonal, but professional relationship with some of your customers (say, an account manager or a sales representative) and the employee passes away unexpectedly, should you inform your customers that they have passed? Or should you just treat the situation as if they have moved on from the company?
My personal preference is not to burden the customer with the knowledge - just keep it to
Sorry, $x is no longer with us. $y has taken over their role, so I will pass you on to them.
(which is the standard script for when an employee quits/fired). Then if asked why, I will then mention that the person has passed away, but not give any more details unless again asked.
Is there another way of handling the situation?
customer-service death
edited Apr 10 '17 at 11:47
Konerak
2,57711426
asked Feb 16 '14 at 23:22
Mark Henderson
5531523
add a comment |Â
up vote
53
down vote
favorite
up vote
53
down vote
favorite
If you have an employee who has an impersonal, but professional relationship with some of your customers (say, an account manager or a sales representative) and the employee passes away unexpectedly, should you inform your customers that they have passed? Or should you just treat the situation as if they have moved on from the company?
My personal preference is not to burden the customer with the knowledge - just keep it to
Sorry, $x is no longer with us. $y has taken over their role, so I will pass you on to them.
(which is the standard script for when an employee quits/fired). Then if asked why, I will then mention that the person has passed away, but not give any more details unless again asked.
Is there another way of handling the situation?
customer-service death
edited Apr 10 '17 at 11:47
Konerak
2,57711426
asked Feb 16 '14 at 23:22
Mark Henderson
5531523
If you have an employee who has an impersonal, but professional relationship with some of your customers (say, an account manager or a sales representative) and the employee passes away unexpectedly, should you inform your customers that they have passed? Or should you just treat the situation as if they have moved on from the company?
My personal preference is not to burden the customer with the knowledge - just keep it to
Sorry, $x is no longer with us. $y has taken over their role, so I will pass you on to them.
(which is the standard script for when an employee quits/fired). Then if asked why, I will then mention that the person has passed away, but not give any more details unless again asked.
Is there another way of handling the situation?
customer-service death
edited Apr 10 '17 at 11:47
Konerak
2,57711426
asked Feb 16 '14 at 23:22
Mark Henderson
5531523
edited Apr 10 '17 at 11:47
Konerak
2,57711426
edited Apr 10 '17 at 11:47
Konerak
2,57711426
edited Apr 10 '17 at 11:47
Konerak
2,57711426
2,57711426
asked Feb 16 '14 at 23:22
Mark Henderson
5531523
asked Feb 16 '14 at 23:22
Mark Henderson
5531523
asked Feb 16 '14 at 23:22
Mark Henderson
5531523
5531523
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
51
down vote
While it may seem like a good approach to sweep the news of your employees passing under the rug, it's important to remember that despite this being business, people are still human. If the employee in question played a major role in solving problems for your clients and has built a relationship with those clients, you'll most likely want to let everyone know in a timely manner.
According to a TechRepublic article, 10 tips for Handling the Death of an Employee, you should announce this news to all employees in an in-person meeting. For clients, this may be tougher and may depend on how many clients your employee worked for. The rationale behind a personal announcement to employees is based on the strong relationship bonds that form between coworkers.
Thus, if your employee was a major accounts representative and, let's say, was working directly with 3 to 5 clients, you'll more than likely want to contact them each individually to let them know the news. But if your employee worked with a hundred clients, and those clients may not likely know the employee, then an official email BCC'ed to all clients would be appropriate. Some clients may not care, some will. But those that knew your employee will more than likely appreciate you taking the time to share the news.
answered Feb 16 '14 at 23:33
jmort253♦
10.4k54376
4
That's a good article; especially regarding re-recording the voicemail message. I find it exceedingly eery to hear the voice of a deceased person so soon after the event.
– Mark Henderson
Feb 16 '14 at 23:37
2
Some places don't do this though. I know of a company that left a user's login in the system. None of us could actually make the move to delete that person's login. It was like we were keeping them alive somehow. Maybe a more middle ground approach would be to reduce all permissions to read-only or reduce access to the absolute bare minimum.
– jmort253♦
Feb 16 '14 at 23:42
2
@jmort253 xkcd.com/686
– Elysian Fields♦
Feb 17 '14 at 0:54
add a comment |Â
up vote
30
down vote
The only reason not to tell the client is because you personally don't want to have a potentially awkward conversation. But the client may want to know because he might want to attend the funeral or send a sympathy card. (I got cards from clients when my beloved died). He might want to know because he will assume there was a turnover of information and be mad when it becomes clear that there was not.
This is especially true if they had some phone discussion just prior to the death that the new person may know nothing about. (It can also be a problem if you do not give the new person access to the emails of the person who died so they don't have any of the history that is stored in the emails, especially the most recent ones.) A client is more likely to give your company the benefit of the doubt as initial issues arise due to the new person not knowing something, if they know that there is no way the old person can be asked. So for business reasons, you will likely maintain better client relations if you tell them.
edited Feb 17 '14 at 2:53
jmort253♦
10.4k54376
answered Feb 17 '14 at 2:00
HLGEM
133k25227489
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Depending on the depth of the relationship, I could imagine passing along the passing in some cases. If the customer often called the employee or it is a customer that has worked with this person for a long time like a decade or more, then it isn't burdening but rather showing that you want this person to know something that they may not know. On the other hand, if the customer is fairly new, then what you've outlined would be fine.
answered Feb 16 '14 at 23:27
JB King
15.1k22957
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
This should be expressed to the same degree it is expressed within a professional business. For smaller businesses there will likely be an in-person group meeting-- but if the business is large or corporate in nature, with more than one location, chances are it will come out in a company-wide email. The same email should probably go out to all the major clients (bcc, or individually), in a professional manner. "We regret to inform you...".
This is probably also a good opportunity for the business to express confidence in the required transfer of responsibility to another person, or to defer that discussion to a msg to follow.
The one exception I might note is if the business is small or one in which most of the business relationships are in-person or direct on phone. In those cases, it might be wise to pass the message on via the same means; and also offer confidence in the transfer of responsibility.
answered Feb 17 '14 at 14:04
Miro
2,83441626
add a comment |Â
StackExchange.ready(function ()
$("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function ()
var showEditor = function()
$("#show-editor-button").hide();
$("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
;
var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
if(useFancy == 'True')
var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');
$(this).loadPopup(
url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
loaded: function(popup)
var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');
pTitle.text(popupTitle);
pBody.html(popupBody);
pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
)
else
var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true)
showEditor();
);
);
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
51
down vote
While it may seem like a good approach to sweep the news of your employees passing under the rug, it's important to remember that despite this being business, people are still human. If the employee in question played a major role in solving problems for your clients and has built a relationship with those clients, you'll most likely want to let everyone know in a timely manner.
According to a TechRepublic article, 10 tips for Handling the Death of an Employee, you should announce this news to all employees in an in-person meeting. For clients, this may be tougher and may depend on how many clients your employee worked for. The rationale behind a personal announcement to employees is based on the strong relationship bonds that form between coworkers.
Thus, if your employee was a major accounts representative and, let's say, was working directly with 3 to 5 clients, you'll more than likely want to contact them each individually to let them know the news. But if your employee worked with a hundred clients, and those clients may not likely know the employee, then an official email BCC'ed to all clients would be appropriate. Some clients may not care, some will. But those that knew your employee will more than likely appreciate you taking the time to share the news.
answered Feb 16 '14 at 23:33
jmort253♦
10.4k54376
4
That's a good article; especially regarding re-recording the voicemail message. I find it exceedingly eery to hear the voice of a deceased person so soon after the event.
– Mark Henderson
Feb 16 '14 at 23:37
2
Some places don't do this though. I know of a company that left a user's login in the system. None of us could actually make the move to delete that person's login. It was like we were keeping them alive somehow. Maybe a more middle ground approach would be to reduce all permissions to read-only or reduce access to the absolute bare minimum.
– jmort253♦
Feb 16 '14 at 23:42
2
@jmort253 xkcd.com/686
– Elysian Fields♦
Feb 17 '14 at 0:54
add a comment |Â
up vote
51
down vote
While it may seem like a good approach to sweep the news of your employees passing under the rug, it's important to remember that despite this being business, people are still human. If the employee in question played a major role in solving problems for your clients and has built a relationship with those clients, you'll most likely want to let everyone know in a timely manner.
According to a TechRepublic article, 10 tips for Handling the Death of an Employee, you should announce this news to all employees in an in-person meeting. For clients, this may be tougher and may depend on how many clients your employee worked for. The rationale behind a personal announcement to employees is based on the strong relationship bonds that form between coworkers.
Thus, if your employee was a major accounts representative and, let's say, was working directly with 3 to 5 clients, you'll more than likely want to contact them each individually to let them know the news. But if your employee worked with a hundred clients, and those clients may not likely know the employee, then an official email BCC'ed to all clients would be appropriate. Some clients may not care, some will. But those that knew your employee will more than likely appreciate you taking the time to share the news.
answered Feb 16 '14 at 23:33
jmort253♦
10.4k54376
4
That's a good article; especially regarding re-recording the voicemail message. I find it exceedingly eery to hear the voice of a deceased person so soon after the event.
– Mark Henderson
Feb 16 '14 at 23:37
2
Some places don't do this though. I know of a company that left a user's login in the system. None of us could actually make the move to delete that person's login. It was like we were keeping them alive somehow. Maybe a more middle ground approach would be to reduce all permissions to read-only or reduce access to the absolute bare minimum.
– jmort253♦
Feb 16 '14 at 23:42
2
@jmort253 xkcd.com/686
– Elysian Fields♦
Feb 17 '14 at 0:54
add a comment |Â
up vote
51
down vote
up vote
51
down vote
While it may seem like a good approach to sweep the news of your employees passing under the rug, it's important to remember that despite this being business, people are still human. If the employee in question played a major role in solving problems for your clients and has built a relationship with those clients, you'll most likely want to let everyone know in a timely manner.
According to a TechRepublic article, 10 tips for Handling the Death of an Employee, you should announce this news to all employees in an in-person meeting. For clients, this may be tougher and may depend on how many clients your employee worked for. The rationale behind a personal announcement to employees is based on the strong relationship bonds that form between coworkers.
Thus, if your employee was a major accounts representative and, let's say, was working directly with 3 to 5 clients, you'll more than likely want to contact them each individually to let them know the news. But if your employee worked with a hundred clients, and those clients may not likely know the employee, then an official email BCC'ed to all clients would be appropriate. Some clients may not care, some will. But those that knew your employee will more than likely appreciate you taking the time to share the news.
answered Feb 16 '14 at 23:33
jmort253♦
10.4k54376
While it may seem like a good approach to sweep the news of your employees passing under the rug, it's important to remember that despite this being business, people are still human. If the employee in question played a major role in solving problems for your clients and has built a relationship with those clients, you'll most likely want to let everyone know in a timely manner.
According to a TechRepublic article, 10 tips for Handling the Death of an Employee, you should announce this news to all employees in an in-person meeting. For clients, this may be tougher and may depend on how many clients your employee worked for. The rationale behind a personal announcement to employees is based on the strong relationship bonds that form between coworkers.
Thus, if your employee was a major accounts representative and, let's say, was working directly with 3 to 5 clients, you'll more than likely want to contact them each individually to let them know the news. But if your employee worked with a hundred clients, and those clients may not likely know the employee, then an official email BCC'ed to all clients would be appropriate. Some clients may not care, some will. But those that knew your employee will more than likely appreciate you taking the time to share the news.
answered Feb 16 '14 at 23:33
jmort253♦
10.4k54376
answered Feb 16 '14 at 23:33
jmort253♦
10.4k54376
answered Feb 16 '14 at 23:33
jmort253♦
10.4k54376
answered Feb 16 '14 at 23:33
jmort253♦
10.4k54376
10.4k54376
4
That's a good article; especially regarding re-recording the voicemail message. I find it exceedingly eery to hear the voice of a deceased person so soon after the event.
– Mark Henderson
Feb 16 '14 at 23:37
2
Some places don't do this though. I know of a company that left a user's login in the system. None of us could actually make the move to delete that person's login. It was like we were keeping them alive somehow. Maybe a more middle ground approach would be to reduce all permissions to read-only or reduce access to the absolute bare minimum.
– jmort253♦
Feb 16 '14 at 23:42
2
@jmort253 xkcd.com/686
– Elysian Fields♦
Feb 17 '14 at 0:54
add a comment |Â
4
That's a good article; especially regarding re-recording the voicemail message. I find it exceedingly eery to hear the voice of a deceased person so soon after the event.
– Mark Henderson
Feb 16 '14 at 23:37
2
Some places don't do this though. I know of a company that left a user's login in the system. None of us could actually make the move to delete that person's login. It was like we were keeping them alive somehow. Maybe a more middle ground approach would be to reduce all permissions to read-only or reduce access to the absolute bare minimum.
– jmort253♦
Feb 16 '14 at 23:42
2
@jmort253 xkcd.com/686
– Elysian Fields♦
Feb 17 '14 at 0:54
4
4
That's a good article; especially regarding re-recording the voicemail message. I find it exceedingly eery to hear the voice of a deceased person so soon after the event.
– Mark Henderson
Feb 16 '14 at 23:37
That's a good article; especially regarding re-recording the voicemail message. I find it exceedingly eery to hear the voice of a deceased person so soon after the event.
– Mark Henderson
Feb 16 '14 at 23:37
2
2
Some places don't do this though. I know of a company that left a user's login in the system. None of us could actually make the move to delete that person's login. It was like we were keeping them alive somehow. Maybe a more middle ground approach would be to reduce all permissions to read-only or reduce access to the absolute bare minimum.
– jmort253♦
Feb 16 '14 at 23:42
Some places don't do this though. I know of a company that left a user's login in the system. None of us could actually make the move to delete that person's login. It was like we were keeping them alive somehow. Maybe a more middle ground approach would be to reduce all permissions to read-only or reduce access to the absolute bare minimum.
– jmort253♦
Feb 16 '14 at 23:42
2
2
@jmort253 xkcd.com/686
– Elysian Fields♦
Feb 17 '14 at 0:54
@jmort253 xkcd.com/686
– Elysian Fields♦
Feb 17 '14 at 0:54
add a comment |Â
up vote
30
down vote
The only reason not to tell the client is because you personally don't want to have a potentially awkward conversation. But the client may want to know because he might want to attend the funeral or send a sympathy card. (I got cards from clients when my beloved died). He might want to know because he will assume there was a turnover of information and be mad when it becomes clear that there was not.
This is especially true if they had some phone discussion just prior to the death that the new person may know nothing about. (It can also be a problem if you do not give the new person access to the emails of the person who died so they don't have any of the history that is stored in the emails, especially the most recent ones.) A client is more likely to give your company the benefit of the doubt as initial issues arise due to the new person not knowing something, if they know that there is no way the old person can be asked. So for business reasons, you will likely maintain better client relations if you tell them.
edited Feb 17 '14 at 2:53
jmort253♦
10.4k54376
answered Feb 17 '14 at 2:00
HLGEM
133k25227489
add a comment |Â
up vote
30
down vote
The only reason not to tell the client is because you personally don't want to have a potentially awkward conversation. But the client may want to know because he might want to attend the funeral or send a sympathy card. (I got cards from clients when my beloved died). He might want to know because he will assume there was a turnover of information and be mad when it becomes clear that there was not.
This is especially true if they had some phone discussion just prior to the death that the new person may know nothing about. (It can also be a problem if you do not give the new person access to the emails of the person who died so they don't have any of the history that is stored in the emails, especially the most recent ones.) A client is more likely to give your company the benefit of the doubt as initial issues arise due to the new person not knowing something, if they know that there is no way the old person can be asked. So for business reasons, you will likely maintain better client relations if you tell them.
edited Feb 17 '14 at 2:53
jmort253♦
10.4k54376
answered Feb 17 '14 at 2:00
HLGEM
133k25227489
add a comment |Â
up vote
30
down vote
up vote
30
down vote
The only reason not to tell the client is because you personally don't want to have a potentially awkward conversation. But the client may want to know because he might want to attend the funeral or send a sympathy card. (I got cards from clients when my beloved died). He might want to know because he will assume there was a turnover of information and be mad when it becomes clear that there was not.
This is especially true if they had some phone discussion just prior to the death that the new person may know nothing about. (It can also be a problem if you do not give the new person access to the emails of the person who died so they don't have any of the history that is stored in the emails, especially the most recent ones.) A client is more likely to give your company the benefit of the doubt as initial issues arise due to the new person not knowing something, if they know that there is no way the old person can be asked. So for business reasons, you will likely maintain better client relations if you tell them.
edited Feb 17 '14 at 2:53
jmort253♦
10.4k54376
answered Feb 17 '14 at 2:00
HLGEM
133k25227489
The only reason not to tell the client is because you personally don't want to have a potentially awkward conversation. But the client may want to know because he might want to attend the funeral or send a sympathy card. (I got cards from clients when my beloved died). He might want to know because he will assume there was a turnover of information and be mad when it becomes clear that there was not.
This is especially true if they had some phone discussion just prior to the death that the new person may know nothing about. (It can also be a problem if you do not give the new person access to the emails of the person who died so they don't have any of the history that is stored in the emails, especially the most recent ones.) A client is more likely to give your company the benefit of the doubt as initial issues arise due to the new person not knowing something, if they know that there is no way the old person can be asked. So for business reasons, you will likely maintain better client relations if you tell them.
edited Feb 17 '14 at 2:53
jmort253♦
10.4k54376
answered Feb 17 '14 at 2:00
HLGEM
133k25227489
edited Feb 17 '14 at 2:53
jmort253♦
10.4k54376
edited Feb 17 '14 at 2:53
jmort253♦
10.4k54376
edited Feb 17 '14 at 2:53
jmort253♦
10.4k54376
10.4k54376
answered Feb 17 '14 at 2:00
HLGEM
133k25227489
answered Feb 17 '14 at 2:00
HLGEM
133k25227489
answered Feb 17 '14 at 2:00
HLGEM
133k25227489
133k25227489
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Depending on the depth of the relationship, I could imagine passing along the passing in some cases. If the customer often called the employee or it is a customer that has worked with this person for a long time like a decade or more, then it isn't burdening but rather showing that you want this person to know something that they may not know. On the other hand, if the customer is fairly new, then what you've outlined would be fine.
answered Feb 16 '14 at 23:27
JB King
15.1k22957
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Depending on the depth of the relationship, I could imagine passing along the passing in some cases. If the customer often called the employee or it is a customer that has worked with this person for a long time like a decade or more, then it isn't burdening but rather showing that you want this person to know something that they may not know. On the other hand, if the customer is fairly new, then what you've outlined would be fine.
answered Feb 16 '14 at 23:27
JB King
15.1k22957
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Depending on the depth of the relationship, I could imagine passing along the passing in some cases. If the customer often called the employee or it is a customer that has worked with this person for a long time like a decade or more, then it isn't burdening but rather showing that you want this person to know something that they may not know. On the other hand, if the customer is fairly new, then what you've outlined would be fine.
answered Feb 16 '14 at 23:27
JB King
15.1k22957
Depending on the depth of the relationship, I could imagine passing along the passing in some cases. If the customer often called the employee or it is a customer that has worked with this person for a long time like a decade or more, then it isn't burdening but rather showing that you want this person to know something that they may not know. On the other hand, if the customer is fairly new, then what you've outlined would be fine.
answered Feb 16 '14 at 23:27
JB King
15.1k22957
answered Feb 16 '14 at 23:27
JB King
15.1k22957
answered Feb 16 '14 at 23:27
JB King
15.1k22957
answered Feb 16 '14 at 23:27
JB King
15.1k22957
15.1k22957
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
This should be expressed to the same degree it is expressed within a professional business. For smaller businesses there will likely be an in-person group meeting-- but if the business is large or corporate in nature, with more than one location, chances are it will come out in a company-wide email. The same email should probably go out to all the major clients (bcc, or individually), in a professional manner. "We regret to inform you...".
This is probably also a good opportunity for the business to express confidence in the required transfer of responsibility to another person, or to defer that discussion to a msg to follow.
The one exception I might note is if the business is small or one in which most of the business relationships are in-person or direct on phone. In those cases, it might be wise to pass the message on via the same means; and also offer confidence in the transfer of responsibility.
answered Feb 17 '14 at 14:04
Miro
2,83441626
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
This should be expressed to the same degree it is expressed within a professional business. For smaller businesses there will likely be an in-person group meeting-- but if the business is large or corporate in nature, with more than one location, chances are it will come out in a company-wide email. The same email should probably go out to all the major clients (bcc, or individually), in a professional manner. "We regret to inform you...".
This is probably also a good opportunity for the business to express confidence in the required transfer of responsibility to another person, or to defer that discussion to a msg to follow.
The one exception I might note is if the business is small or one in which most of the business relationships are in-person or direct on phone. In those cases, it might be wise to pass the message on via the same means; and also offer confidence in the transfer of responsibility.
answered Feb 17 '14 at 14:04
Miro
2,83441626
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
This should be expressed to the same degree it is expressed within a professional business. For smaller businesses there will likely be an in-person group meeting-- but if the business is large or corporate in nature, with more than one location, chances are it will come out in a company-wide email. The same email should probably go out to all the major clients (bcc, or individually), in a professional manner. "We regret to inform you...".
This is probably also a good opportunity for the business to express confidence in the required transfer of responsibility to another person, or to defer that discussion to a msg to follow.
The one exception I might note is if the business is small or one in which most of the business relationships are in-person or direct on phone. In those cases, it might be wise to pass the message on via the same means; and also offer confidence in the transfer of responsibility.
answered Feb 17 '14 at 14:04
Miro
2,83441626
This should be expressed to the same degree it is expressed within a professional business. For smaller businesses there will likely be an in-person group meeting-- but if the business is large or corporate in nature, with more than one location, chances are it will come out in a company-wide email. The same email should probably go out to all the major clients (bcc, or individually), in a professional manner. "We regret to inform you...".
This is probably also a good opportunity for the business to express confidence in the required transfer of responsibility to another person, or to defer that discussion to a msg to follow.
The one exception I might note is if the business is small or one in which most of the business relationships are in-person or direct on phone. In those cases, it might be wise to pass the message on via the same means; and also offer confidence in the transfer of responsibility.
answered Feb 17 '14 at 14:04
Miro
2,83441626
answered Feb 17 '14 at 14:04
Miro
2,83441626
answered Feb 17 '14 at 14:04
Miro
2,83441626
answered Feb 17 '14 at 14:04
Miro
2,83441626
2,83441626
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f19361%2finforming-customers-about-the-death-of-an-employee%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
