How can I ask for my salary to match what the person I'm replacing got?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
36
down vote

favorite
2












In the next week or so I'll be having a meeting with my manager to discuss the promotion I recently got. I'm taking over the role of a work-mate who is currently serving his notice period. I know how much he got paid and I also know that the offer I'm going to get will be slightly less.



How do I properly/ethically say "I know (Joe Bloggs) got £xx,xxx a year, can you match that for me?"



I work for a large company with a huge budget, so that's not a problem.







share|improve this question

















  • 16




    "I work for a large company with a huge budget, so that's not a problem." Maybe you should clarify this? I don't even think you're using the word "budget" right. They probably have a very tiny budget for you, so that is a problem.
    – user42272
    Jul 24 '16 at 21:11






  • 69




    If anything, you should be aiming to get the salary Joe Bloggs got on day 1 of his promotion to his current position, not the salary he is on after having gained x years experience in the position.
    – Scott
    Jul 24 '16 at 22:50






  • 7




    @Scott Corrected for inflation.
    – gerrit
    Jul 25 '16 at 9:41






  • 15




    " I also know that the offer I'm going to get will be slightly less." - I would be snapping their hand off to shake on the deal then. Usually you would get significantly less as you don't have that experience yet
    – Matt Wilko
    Jul 25 '16 at 9:51







  • 5




    If Joe Bloggs received a salary less than your last, would you take a pay cut? No - you'd say that your rate is your rate, and that it's not your problem if the market has changed to give you more leverage - that's how capitalism works. So why wouldn't you accept the same proposition in reverse?
    – Jimmy Breck-McKye
    Jul 25 '16 at 10:24
















up vote
36
down vote

favorite
2












In the next week or so I'll be having a meeting with my manager to discuss the promotion I recently got. I'm taking over the role of a work-mate who is currently serving his notice period. I know how much he got paid and I also know that the offer I'm going to get will be slightly less.



How do I properly/ethically say "I know (Joe Bloggs) got £xx,xxx a year, can you match that for me?"



I work for a large company with a huge budget, so that's not a problem.







share|improve this question

















  • 16




    "I work for a large company with a huge budget, so that's not a problem." Maybe you should clarify this? I don't even think you're using the word "budget" right. They probably have a very tiny budget for you, so that is a problem.
    – user42272
    Jul 24 '16 at 21:11






  • 69




    If anything, you should be aiming to get the salary Joe Bloggs got on day 1 of his promotion to his current position, not the salary he is on after having gained x years experience in the position.
    – Scott
    Jul 24 '16 at 22:50






  • 7




    @Scott Corrected for inflation.
    – gerrit
    Jul 25 '16 at 9:41






  • 15




    " I also know that the offer I'm going to get will be slightly less." - I would be snapping their hand off to shake on the deal then. Usually you would get significantly less as you don't have that experience yet
    – Matt Wilko
    Jul 25 '16 at 9:51







  • 5




    If Joe Bloggs received a salary less than your last, would you take a pay cut? No - you'd say that your rate is your rate, and that it's not your problem if the market has changed to give you more leverage - that's how capitalism works. So why wouldn't you accept the same proposition in reverse?
    – Jimmy Breck-McKye
    Jul 25 '16 at 10:24












up vote
36
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
36
down vote

favorite
2






2





In the next week or so I'll be having a meeting with my manager to discuss the promotion I recently got. I'm taking over the role of a work-mate who is currently serving his notice period. I know how much he got paid and I also know that the offer I'm going to get will be slightly less.



How do I properly/ethically say "I know (Joe Bloggs) got £xx,xxx a year, can you match that for me?"



I work for a large company with a huge budget, so that's not a problem.







share|improve this question













In the next week or so I'll be having a meeting with my manager to discuss the promotion I recently got. I'm taking over the role of a work-mate who is currently serving his notice period. I know how much he got paid and I also know that the offer I'm going to get will be slightly less.



How do I properly/ethically say "I know (Joe Bloggs) got £xx,xxx a year, can you match that for me?"



I work for a large company with a huge budget, so that's not a problem.









share|improve this question












share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jul 24 '16 at 17:52









Monica Cellio♦

43.6k17114191




43.6k17114191









asked Jul 24 '16 at 17:13









Wilf

183126




183126







  • 16




    "I work for a large company with a huge budget, so that's not a problem." Maybe you should clarify this? I don't even think you're using the word "budget" right. They probably have a very tiny budget for you, so that is a problem.
    – user42272
    Jul 24 '16 at 21:11






  • 69




    If anything, you should be aiming to get the salary Joe Bloggs got on day 1 of his promotion to his current position, not the salary he is on after having gained x years experience in the position.
    – Scott
    Jul 24 '16 at 22:50






  • 7




    @Scott Corrected for inflation.
    – gerrit
    Jul 25 '16 at 9:41






  • 15




    " I also know that the offer I'm going to get will be slightly less." - I would be snapping their hand off to shake on the deal then. Usually you would get significantly less as you don't have that experience yet
    – Matt Wilko
    Jul 25 '16 at 9:51







  • 5




    If Joe Bloggs received a salary less than your last, would you take a pay cut? No - you'd say that your rate is your rate, and that it's not your problem if the market has changed to give you more leverage - that's how capitalism works. So why wouldn't you accept the same proposition in reverse?
    – Jimmy Breck-McKye
    Jul 25 '16 at 10:24












  • 16




    "I work for a large company with a huge budget, so that's not a problem." Maybe you should clarify this? I don't even think you're using the word "budget" right. They probably have a very tiny budget for you, so that is a problem.
    – user42272
    Jul 24 '16 at 21:11






  • 69




    If anything, you should be aiming to get the salary Joe Bloggs got on day 1 of his promotion to his current position, not the salary he is on after having gained x years experience in the position.
    – Scott
    Jul 24 '16 at 22:50






  • 7




    @Scott Corrected for inflation.
    – gerrit
    Jul 25 '16 at 9:41






  • 15




    " I also know that the offer I'm going to get will be slightly less." - I would be snapping their hand off to shake on the deal then. Usually you would get significantly less as you don't have that experience yet
    – Matt Wilko
    Jul 25 '16 at 9:51







  • 5




    If Joe Bloggs received a salary less than your last, would you take a pay cut? No - you'd say that your rate is your rate, and that it's not your problem if the market has changed to give you more leverage - that's how capitalism works. So why wouldn't you accept the same proposition in reverse?
    – Jimmy Breck-McKye
    Jul 25 '16 at 10:24







16




16




"I work for a large company with a huge budget, so that's not a problem." Maybe you should clarify this? I don't even think you're using the word "budget" right. They probably have a very tiny budget for you, so that is a problem.
– user42272
Jul 24 '16 at 21:11




"I work for a large company with a huge budget, so that's not a problem." Maybe you should clarify this? I don't even think you're using the word "budget" right. They probably have a very tiny budget for you, so that is a problem.
– user42272
Jul 24 '16 at 21:11




69




69




If anything, you should be aiming to get the salary Joe Bloggs got on day 1 of his promotion to his current position, not the salary he is on after having gained x years experience in the position.
– Scott
Jul 24 '16 at 22:50




If anything, you should be aiming to get the salary Joe Bloggs got on day 1 of his promotion to his current position, not the salary he is on after having gained x years experience in the position.
– Scott
Jul 24 '16 at 22:50




7




7




@Scott Corrected for inflation.
– gerrit
Jul 25 '16 at 9:41




@Scott Corrected for inflation.
– gerrit
Jul 25 '16 at 9:41




15




15




" I also know that the offer I'm going to get will be slightly less." - I would be snapping their hand off to shake on the deal then. Usually you would get significantly less as you don't have that experience yet
– Matt Wilko
Jul 25 '16 at 9:51





" I also know that the offer I'm going to get will be slightly less." - I would be snapping their hand off to shake on the deal then. Usually you would get significantly less as you don't have that experience yet
– Matt Wilko
Jul 25 '16 at 9:51





5




5




If Joe Bloggs received a salary less than your last, would you take a pay cut? No - you'd say that your rate is your rate, and that it's not your problem if the market has changed to give you more leverage - that's how capitalism works. So why wouldn't you accept the same proposition in reverse?
– Jimmy Breck-McKye
Jul 25 '16 at 10:24




If Joe Bloggs received a salary less than your last, would you take a pay cut? No - you'd say that your rate is your rate, and that it's not your problem if the market has changed to give you more leverage - that's how capitalism works. So why wouldn't you accept the same proposition in reverse?
– Jimmy Breck-McKye
Jul 25 '16 at 10:24










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
155
down vote



accepted











How do I properly/ethically say "I know (Joe Bloggs) got £xx,xxx a
year, can you match that for me?"




Talk about what salary you feel you deserve and the value you bring to the company. Don't talk about what someone else made or makes - it's not relevant.



Would you take less if Joe Bloggs was making less than you? No, of course you wouldn't.



While in some domains, a specific number is assigned to a specific role, for the most part companies typically assign a salary range to a particular role. It's very common for folks promoted into a role to enter on the low end of that range.



You have 0 months experience in this new role. Most likely Joe Bloggs had more. It wouldn't be unusual if Joe Bloggs got raises during the time he held this role.



Concentrate on you, not others.






share|improve this answer



















  • 17




    the salary you make should be based on objective facts, like your experience and the value of your work to the company, not your negotiating skills. (unless you work as a negotiator...) Facts like the salary the company pays for similar positions, or for similar expectations is relevant.
    – njzk2
    Jul 24 '16 at 21:51






  • 26




    Ontop of this 100% accurate answer, keep in mind that Joe Bloggs' increased salary may have contributed to his firing
    – David Grinberg
    Jul 25 '16 at 1:35






  • 11




    @DavidGrinberg Firing? Serving his notice period in the US usually doesn't mean they've been fired. It usually means they've found another position, job, company they're moving to, or retiring, etc....
    – Booga Roo
    Jul 25 '16 at 5:34






  • 3




    Market is relevant. You vs Joe Bloggs is market.
    – Eugene Ryabtsev
    Jul 25 '16 at 8:42






  • 4




    @njzk2 - While Joe gave you some affirmation with his "perhaps that's as it should be" comment. I think he was way to generous. I think your view is a surefire way to achieve mediocrity among the employees. When you come up with the objective formula for how much value a person brings to a company then you'll probably win a Nobel Prize. Until then the best that can be done is setting your own value and convincing companies that you are worth what you are asking. Either they perceive you to be worth it or not. What someone else makes has no relevance. No 2 people are the same or even similar.
    – Dunk
    Jul 25 '16 at 22:03

















up vote
14
down vote













You don't. What Joe Bloggs makes is no one's business but Joe's, and perhaps the guy who signs his cheques. You're also assuming old Joe makes more than you, which might not be the case.



What you should do instead is research the average income for your new role and responsibilities, so say instead:




The average income of a Foo Engineer in the general area is £x, given my experience in the company / expertise with the product / sunny disposition I'd like to see a figure of £x + y.




The only problem is, in a salary negotiation the one who names a figure first loses. The best tactic is to ask management how much they think you're worth.




So then, new job, new responsibilities, should I expect a salary increase to match?




If they respond with a figure below the market average you've already researched, you can use that as a lever instead. If their figure is too low then maybe you should start drafting your notice letter as well.



Good luck






share|improve this answer

















  • 4




    +1 for the first two paragraphs, -1 for the third. That myth is an utter falsehood and hurts more than it helps.
    – Lilienthal♦
    Jul 24 '16 at 18:01






  • 9




    At this point we may just want to create a new question about that old classic because I see it come up at least once a week. As mentioned here (external) there is some value to that advice but a plain "first to give a number loses" is so black-and-white that it's silly.
    – Lilienthal♦
    Jul 24 '16 at 18:22







  • 1




    Furthermore what does average even mean? By city, years of experience, company? That company with that many years of experience? Java, C++, Ruby on Rails, full stack? Masters or bachelors? Ivy or community college? What hired.com says? What other people in your graduating class made? Be prepared to see statistics for what "average" is that you don't like. They will have data, you will not be able to argue against it because it will be correct. You just won't like it. (This happened to me in a negotiation once. We correctly refused to even read the report.)
    – user42272
    Jul 24 '16 at 21:25







  • 1




    I strongly disagree. What that other person made is relevant to the value the company place in the job being asked in this position.
    – njzk2
    Jul 24 '16 at 21:49






  • 1




    @njzk2 I don't think that's always entirely correct. Sometimes, the other person might be what the company was valuing so high - not necessarily the position.
    – DoubleDouble
    Jul 25 '16 at 5:00

















up vote
7
down vote













Some questions to ask to yourself



  1. Do you have the same education as Joe


  2. Do you have the same work experience as Joe


  3. Do you think that you will perform at this job position the same as Joe,
    or even better


  4. Has Joe earned this salary from day one


You have to compare same situations and don't get greedy. You don't have to mention Joe's salary. What I would do is I would allow some room for negotiation but not immediately, in like 3-6 months. You can ask your boss during the meeting, that you know that it will be your first time for this assignment but you are definitely sure that you can deliver even better results and if that's the case ask if they will be willing to renegotiate salary in 3-6 months.






share|improve this answer





















  • It's the other way around. You are taking Joe's responsibility because they want it that way. They already think you can do as good or better. Regardless of education and such.
    – Neolisk
    Jul 25 '16 at 16:58

















up vote
1
down vote













I would consider it improper for you to know what "Old Joe" made, and therefore I would not reveal any such knowledge.



You received a promotion (congratulations ...!) and you are there to discuss an offer. Do you consider this compensation to be fair and appropriate ("nevermind old Joe ...") for you?



Effectively, the company is "buying a product," namely, "your professional services." Are they offering to pay an agreeable price? If you seriously believe that they are offering less money than you would or should accept, then you should be prepared to present counter-arguments at the negotiating table ... "nevermind "Old Joe!"   Joe's not the one who's negotiating, and he's not the one who's going to get the money ... you are.






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    The discussion could go roughly as follows. First, you state that you expect (suspect, know for sure) that Joe Bloggs was making more money than are being offered to you. Second, you compare the value you would be producing for the company on your new position as compared to the value produced by Joe Bloggs. This is where things get tricky.



    If Joe Bloggs is moving to greener pastures (or higher up etc.), he might be worth even more than he was paid, and might have been producing that much of value. So, you (a) propose some tangible performance goals that might be a bit less than Joe Bloggs' real achievements, but are in line with the salary he had. And then (b) try to meet or exceed them.



    Your position is strenghtened by the fact that they could not keep Joe Bloggs on this position for these money, so you don't have to be as good as him to be worth that much.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 2




      -1 because you are not talking about you, but talking about some ex-employee Joe and makes you seem entitled. The best way to get what you want is talk about you. How would you like if you were being paid less because that's what Joe was being paid?
      – Burhan Khalid
      Jul 25 '16 at 7:58










    • @BurhanKhalid If he was paid less and left, and I would be as good as him, I'd follow suit unless I would be paid more. It's the market. I do not understand how you read "entitled" into my answer.
      – Eugene Ryabtsev
      Jul 25 '16 at 8:40










    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "423"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: false,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f71954%2fhow-can-i-ask-for-my-salary-to-match-what-the-person-im-replacing-got%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest

























    StackExchange.ready(function ()
    $("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function ()
    var showEditor = function()
    $("#show-editor-button").hide();
    $("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
    StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
    ;

    var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
    if(useFancy == 'True')
    var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
    var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
    var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');

    $(this).loadPopup(
    url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
    loaded: function(popup)
    var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
    var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
    var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');

    pTitle.text(popupTitle);
    pBody.html(popupBody);
    pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);

    )
    else
    var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
    if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true)
    showEditor();


    );
    );






    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    155
    down vote



    accepted











    How do I properly/ethically say "I know (Joe Bloggs) got £xx,xxx a
    year, can you match that for me?"




    Talk about what salary you feel you deserve and the value you bring to the company. Don't talk about what someone else made or makes - it's not relevant.



    Would you take less if Joe Bloggs was making less than you? No, of course you wouldn't.



    While in some domains, a specific number is assigned to a specific role, for the most part companies typically assign a salary range to a particular role. It's very common for folks promoted into a role to enter on the low end of that range.



    You have 0 months experience in this new role. Most likely Joe Bloggs had more. It wouldn't be unusual if Joe Bloggs got raises during the time he held this role.



    Concentrate on you, not others.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 17




      the salary you make should be based on objective facts, like your experience and the value of your work to the company, not your negotiating skills. (unless you work as a negotiator...) Facts like the salary the company pays for similar positions, or for similar expectations is relevant.
      – njzk2
      Jul 24 '16 at 21:51






    • 26




      Ontop of this 100% accurate answer, keep in mind that Joe Bloggs' increased salary may have contributed to his firing
      – David Grinberg
      Jul 25 '16 at 1:35






    • 11




      @DavidGrinberg Firing? Serving his notice period in the US usually doesn't mean they've been fired. It usually means they've found another position, job, company they're moving to, or retiring, etc....
      – Booga Roo
      Jul 25 '16 at 5:34






    • 3




      Market is relevant. You vs Joe Bloggs is market.
      – Eugene Ryabtsev
      Jul 25 '16 at 8:42






    • 4




      @njzk2 - While Joe gave you some affirmation with his "perhaps that's as it should be" comment. I think he was way to generous. I think your view is a surefire way to achieve mediocrity among the employees. When you come up with the objective formula for how much value a person brings to a company then you'll probably win a Nobel Prize. Until then the best that can be done is setting your own value and convincing companies that you are worth what you are asking. Either they perceive you to be worth it or not. What someone else makes has no relevance. No 2 people are the same or even similar.
      – Dunk
      Jul 25 '16 at 22:03














    up vote
    155
    down vote



    accepted











    How do I properly/ethically say "I know (Joe Bloggs) got £xx,xxx a
    year, can you match that for me?"




    Talk about what salary you feel you deserve and the value you bring to the company. Don't talk about what someone else made or makes - it's not relevant.



    Would you take less if Joe Bloggs was making less than you? No, of course you wouldn't.



    While in some domains, a specific number is assigned to a specific role, for the most part companies typically assign a salary range to a particular role. It's very common for folks promoted into a role to enter on the low end of that range.



    You have 0 months experience in this new role. Most likely Joe Bloggs had more. It wouldn't be unusual if Joe Bloggs got raises during the time he held this role.



    Concentrate on you, not others.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 17




      the salary you make should be based on objective facts, like your experience and the value of your work to the company, not your negotiating skills. (unless you work as a negotiator...) Facts like the salary the company pays for similar positions, or for similar expectations is relevant.
      – njzk2
      Jul 24 '16 at 21:51






    • 26




      Ontop of this 100% accurate answer, keep in mind that Joe Bloggs' increased salary may have contributed to his firing
      – David Grinberg
      Jul 25 '16 at 1:35






    • 11




      @DavidGrinberg Firing? Serving his notice period in the US usually doesn't mean they've been fired. It usually means they've found another position, job, company they're moving to, or retiring, etc....
      – Booga Roo
      Jul 25 '16 at 5:34






    • 3




      Market is relevant. You vs Joe Bloggs is market.
      – Eugene Ryabtsev
      Jul 25 '16 at 8:42






    • 4




      @njzk2 - While Joe gave you some affirmation with his "perhaps that's as it should be" comment. I think he was way to generous. I think your view is a surefire way to achieve mediocrity among the employees. When you come up with the objective formula for how much value a person brings to a company then you'll probably win a Nobel Prize. Until then the best that can be done is setting your own value and convincing companies that you are worth what you are asking. Either they perceive you to be worth it or not. What someone else makes has no relevance. No 2 people are the same or even similar.
      – Dunk
      Jul 25 '16 at 22:03












    up vote
    155
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    155
    down vote



    accepted







    How do I properly/ethically say "I know (Joe Bloggs) got £xx,xxx a
    year, can you match that for me?"




    Talk about what salary you feel you deserve and the value you bring to the company. Don't talk about what someone else made or makes - it's not relevant.



    Would you take less if Joe Bloggs was making less than you? No, of course you wouldn't.



    While in some domains, a specific number is assigned to a specific role, for the most part companies typically assign a salary range to a particular role. It's very common for folks promoted into a role to enter on the low end of that range.



    You have 0 months experience in this new role. Most likely Joe Bloggs had more. It wouldn't be unusual if Joe Bloggs got raises during the time he held this role.



    Concentrate on you, not others.






    share|improve this answer
















    How do I properly/ethically say "I know (Joe Bloggs) got £xx,xxx a
    year, can you match that for me?"




    Talk about what salary you feel you deserve and the value you bring to the company. Don't talk about what someone else made or makes - it's not relevant.



    Would you take less if Joe Bloggs was making less than you? No, of course you wouldn't.



    While in some domains, a specific number is assigned to a specific role, for the most part companies typically assign a salary range to a particular role. It's very common for folks promoted into a role to enter on the low end of that range.



    You have 0 months experience in this new role. Most likely Joe Bloggs had more. It wouldn't be unusual if Joe Bloggs got raises during the time he held this role.



    Concentrate on you, not others.







    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jul 26 '16 at 10:48


























    answered Jul 24 '16 at 17:19









    Joe Strazzere

    222k101648913




    222k101648913







    • 17




      the salary you make should be based on objective facts, like your experience and the value of your work to the company, not your negotiating skills. (unless you work as a negotiator...) Facts like the salary the company pays for similar positions, or for similar expectations is relevant.
      – njzk2
      Jul 24 '16 at 21:51






    • 26




      Ontop of this 100% accurate answer, keep in mind that Joe Bloggs' increased salary may have contributed to his firing
      – David Grinberg
      Jul 25 '16 at 1:35






    • 11




      @DavidGrinberg Firing? Serving his notice period in the US usually doesn't mean they've been fired. It usually means they've found another position, job, company they're moving to, or retiring, etc....
      – Booga Roo
      Jul 25 '16 at 5:34






    • 3




      Market is relevant. You vs Joe Bloggs is market.
      – Eugene Ryabtsev
      Jul 25 '16 at 8:42






    • 4




      @njzk2 - While Joe gave you some affirmation with his "perhaps that's as it should be" comment. I think he was way to generous. I think your view is a surefire way to achieve mediocrity among the employees. When you come up with the objective formula for how much value a person brings to a company then you'll probably win a Nobel Prize. Until then the best that can be done is setting your own value and convincing companies that you are worth what you are asking. Either they perceive you to be worth it or not. What someone else makes has no relevance. No 2 people are the same or even similar.
      – Dunk
      Jul 25 '16 at 22:03












    • 17




      the salary you make should be based on objective facts, like your experience and the value of your work to the company, not your negotiating skills. (unless you work as a negotiator...) Facts like the salary the company pays for similar positions, or for similar expectations is relevant.
      – njzk2
      Jul 24 '16 at 21:51






    • 26




      Ontop of this 100% accurate answer, keep in mind that Joe Bloggs' increased salary may have contributed to his firing
      – David Grinberg
      Jul 25 '16 at 1:35






    • 11




      @DavidGrinberg Firing? Serving his notice period in the US usually doesn't mean they've been fired. It usually means they've found another position, job, company they're moving to, or retiring, etc....
      – Booga Roo
      Jul 25 '16 at 5:34






    • 3




      Market is relevant. You vs Joe Bloggs is market.
      – Eugene Ryabtsev
      Jul 25 '16 at 8:42






    • 4




      @njzk2 - While Joe gave you some affirmation with his "perhaps that's as it should be" comment. I think he was way to generous. I think your view is a surefire way to achieve mediocrity among the employees. When you come up with the objective formula for how much value a person brings to a company then you'll probably win a Nobel Prize. Until then the best that can be done is setting your own value and convincing companies that you are worth what you are asking. Either they perceive you to be worth it or not. What someone else makes has no relevance. No 2 people are the same or even similar.
      – Dunk
      Jul 25 '16 at 22:03







    17




    17




    the salary you make should be based on objective facts, like your experience and the value of your work to the company, not your negotiating skills. (unless you work as a negotiator...) Facts like the salary the company pays for similar positions, or for similar expectations is relevant.
    – njzk2
    Jul 24 '16 at 21:51




    the salary you make should be based on objective facts, like your experience and the value of your work to the company, not your negotiating skills. (unless you work as a negotiator...) Facts like the salary the company pays for similar positions, or for similar expectations is relevant.
    – njzk2
    Jul 24 '16 at 21:51




    26




    26




    Ontop of this 100% accurate answer, keep in mind that Joe Bloggs' increased salary may have contributed to his firing
    – David Grinberg
    Jul 25 '16 at 1:35




    Ontop of this 100% accurate answer, keep in mind that Joe Bloggs' increased salary may have contributed to his firing
    – David Grinberg
    Jul 25 '16 at 1:35




    11




    11




    @DavidGrinberg Firing? Serving his notice period in the US usually doesn't mean they've been fired. It usually means they've found another position, job, company they're moving to, or retiring, etc....
    – Booga Roo
    Jul 25 '16 at 5:34




    @DavidGrinberg Firing? Serving his notice period in the US usually doesn't mean they've been fired. It usually means they've found another position, job, company they're moving to, or retiring, etc....
    – Booga Roo
    Jul 25 '16 at 5:34




    3




    3




    Market is relevant. You vs Joe Bloggs is market.
    – Eugene Ryabtsev
    Jul 25 '16 at 8:42




    Market is relevant. You vs Joe Bloggs is market.
    – Eugene Ryabtsev
    Jul 25 '16 at 8:42




    4




    4




    @njzk2 - While Joe gave you some affirmation with his "perhaps that's as it should be" comment. I think he was way to generous. I think your view is a surefire way to achieve mediocrity among the employees. When you come up with the objective formula for how much value a person brings to a company then you'll probably win a Nobel Prize. Until then the best that can be done is setting your own value and convincing companies that you are worth what you are asking. Either they perceive you to be worth it or not. What someone else makes has no relevance. No 2 people are the same or even similar.
    – Dunk
    Jul 25 '16 at 22:03




    @njzk2 - While Joe gave you some affirmation with his "perhaps that's as it should be" comment. I think he was way to generous. I think your view is a surefire way to achieve mediocrity among the employees. When you come up with the objective formula for how much value a person brings to a company then you'll probably win a Nobel Prize. Until then the best that can be done is setting your own value and convincing companies that you are worth what you are asking. Either they perceive you to be worth it or not. What someone else makes has no relevance. No 2 people are the same or even similar.
    – Dunk
    Jul 25 '16 at 22:03












    up vote
    14
    down vote













    You don't. What Joe Bloggs makes is no one's business but Joe's, and perhaps the guy who signs his cheques. You're also assuming old Joe makes more than you, which might not be the case.



    What you should do instead is research the average income for your new role and responsibilities, so say instead:




    The average income of a Foo Engineer in the general area is £x, given my experience in the company / expertise with the product / sunny disposition I'd like to see a figure of £x + y.




    The only problem is, in a salary negotiation the one who names a figure first loses. The best tactic is to ask management how much they think you're worth.




    So then, new job, new responsibilities, should I expect a salary increase to match?




    If they respond with a figure below the market average you've already researched, you can use that as a lever instead. If their figure is too low then maybe you should start drafting your notice letter as well.



    Good luck






    share|improve this answer

















    • 4




      +1 for the first two paragraphs, -1 for the third. That myth is an utter falsehood and hurts more than it helps.
      – Lilienthal♦
      Jul 24 '16 at 18:01






    • 9




      At this point we may just want to create a new question about that old classic because I see it come up at least once a week. As mentioned here (external) there is some value to that advice but a plain "first to give a number loses" is so black-and-white that it's silly.
      – Lilienthal♦
      Jul 24 '16 at 18:22







    • 1




      Furthermore what does average even mean? By city, years of experience, company? That company with that many years of experience? Java, C++, Ruby on Rails, full stack? Masters or bachelors? Ivy or community college? What hired.com says? What other people in your graduating class made? Be prepared to see statistics for what "average" is that you don't like. They will have data, you will not be able to argue against it because it will be correct. You just won't like it. (This happened to me in a negotiation once. We correctly refused to even read the report.)
      – user42272
      Jul 24 '16 at 21:25







    • 1




      I strongly disagree. What that other person made is relevant to the value the company place in the job being asked in this position.
      – njzk2
      Jul 24 '16 at 21:49






    • 1




      @njzk2 I don't think that's always entirely correct. Sometimes, the other person might be what the company was valuing so high - not necessarily the position.
      – DoubleDouble
      Jul 25 '16 at 5:00














    up vote
    14
    down vote













    You don't. What Joe Bloggs makes is no one's business but Joe's, and perhaps the guy who signs his cheques. You're also assuming old Joe makes more than you, which might not be the case.



    What you should do instead is research the average income for your new role and responsibilities, so say instead:




    The average income of a Foo Engineer in the general area is £x, given my experience in the company / expertise with the product / sunny disposition I'd like to see a figure of £x + y.




    The only problem is, in a salary negotiation the one who names a figure first loses. The best tactic is to ask management how much they think you're worth.




    So then, new job, new responsibilities, should I expect a salary increase to match?




    If they respond with a figure below the market average you've already researched, you can use that as a lever instead. If their figure is too low then maybe you should start drafting your notice letter as well.



    Good luck






    share|improve this answer

















    • 4




      +1 for the first two paragraphs, -1 for the third. That myth is an utter falsehood and hurts more than it helps.
      – Lilienthal♦
      Jul 24 '16 at 18:01






    • 9




      At this point we may just want to create a new question about that old classic because I see it come up at least once a week. As mentioned here (external) there is some value to that advice but a plain "first to give a number loses" is so black-and-white that it's silly.
      – Lilienthal♦
      Jul 24 '16 at 18:22







    • 1




      Furthermore what does average even mean? By city, years of experience, company? That company with that many years of experience? Java, C++, Ruby on Rails, full stack? Masters or bachelors? Ivy or community college? What hired.com says? What other people in your graduating class made? Be prepared to see statistics for what "average" is that you don't like. They will have data, you will not be able to argue against it because it will be correct. You just won't like it. (This happened to me in a negotiation once. We correctly refused to even read the report.)
      – user42272
      Jul 24 '16 at 21:25







    • 1




      I strongly disagree. What that other person made is relevant to the value the company place in the job being asked in this position.
      – njzk2
      Jul 24 '16 at 21:49






    • 1




      @njzk2 I don't think that's always entirely correct. Sometimes, the other person might be what the company was valuing so high - not necessarily the position.
      – DoubleDouble
      Jul 25 '16 at 5:00












    up vote
    14
    down vote










    up vote
    14
    down vote









    You don't. What Joe Bloggs makes is no one's business but Joe's, and perhaps the guy who signs his cheques. You're also assuming old Joe makes more than you, which might not be the case.



    What you should do instead is research the average income for your new role and responsibilities, so say instead:




    The average income of a Foo Engineer in the general area is £x, given my experience in the company / expertise with the product / sunny disposition I'd like to see a figure of £x + y.




    The only problem is, in a salary negotiation the one who names a figure first loses. The best tactic is to ask management how much they think you're worth.




    So then, new job, new responsibilities, should I expect a salary increase to match?




    If they respond with a figure below the market average you've already researched, you can use that as a lever instead. If their figure is too low then maybe you should start drafting your notice letter as well.



    Good luck






    share|improve this answer













    You don't. What Joe Bloggs makes is no one's business but Joe's, and perhaps the guy who signs his cheques. You're also assuming old Joe makes more than you, which might not be the case.



    What you should do instead is research the average income for your new role and responsibilities, so say instead:




    The average income of a Foo Engineer in the general area is £x, given my experience in the company / expertise with the product / sunny disposition I'd like to see a figure of £x + y.




    The only problem is, in a salary negotiation the one who names a figure first loses. The best tactic is to ask management how much they think you're worth.




    So then, new job, new responsibilities, should I expect a salary increase to match?




    If they respond with a figure below the market average you've already researched, you can use that as a lever instead. If their figure is too low then maybe you should start drafting your notice letter as well.



    Good luck







    share|improve this answer













    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer











    answered Jul 24 '16 at 17:22









    rath

    12.1k74368




    12.1k74368







    • 4




      +1 for the first two paragraphs, -1 for the third. That myth is an utter falsehood and hurts more than it helps.
      – Lilienthal♦
      Jul 24 '16 at 18:01






    • 9




      At this point we may just want to create a new question about that old classic because I see it come up at least once a week. As mentioned here (external) there is some value to that advice but a plain "first to give a number loses" is so black-and-white that it's silly.
      – Lilienthal♦
      Jul 24 '16 at 18:22







    • 1




      Furthermore what does average even mean? By city, years of experience, company? That company with that many years of experience? Java, C++, Ruby on Rails, full stack? Masters or bachelors? Ivy or community college? What hired.com says? What other people in your graduating class made? Be prepared to see statistics for what "average" is that you don't like. They will have data, you will not be able to argue against it because it will be correct. You just won't like it. (This happened to me in a negotiation once. We correctly refused to even read the report.)
      – user42272
      Jul 24 '16 at 21:25







    • 1




      I strongly disagree. What that other person made is relevant to the value the company place in the job being asked in this position.
      – njzk2
      Jul 24 '16 at 21:49






    • 1




      @njzk2 I don't think that's always entirely correct. Sometimes, the other person might be what the company was valuing so high - not necessarily the position.
      – DoubleDouble
      Jul 25 '16 at 5:00












    • 4




      +1 for the first two paragraphs, -1 for the third. That myth is an utter falsehood and hurts more than it helps.
      – Lilienthal♦
      Jul 24 '16 at 18:01






    • 9




      At this point we may just want to create a new question about that old classic because I see it come up at least once a week. As mentioned here (external) there is some value to that advice but a plain "first to give a number loses" is so black-and-white that it's silly.
      – Lilienthal♦
      Jul 24 '16 at 18:22







    • 1




      Furthermore what does average even mean? By city, years of experience, company? That company with that many years of experience? Java, C++, Ruby on Rails, full stack? Masters or bachelors? Ivy or community college? What hired.com says? What other people in your graduating class made? Be prepared to see statistics for what "average" is that you don't like. They will have data, you will not be able to argue against it because it will be correct. You just won't like it. (This happened to me in a negotiation once. We correctly refused to even read the report.)
      – user42272
      Jul 24 '16 at 21:25







    • 1




      I strongly disagree. What that other person made is relevant to the value the company place in the job being asked in this position.
      – njzk2
      Jul 24 '16 at 21:49






    • 1




      @njzk2 I don't think that's always entirely correct. Sometimes, the other person might be what the company was valuing so high - not necessarily the position.
      – DoubleDouble
      Jul 25 '16 at 5:00







    4




    4




    +1 for the first two paragraphs, -1 for the third. That myth is an utter falsehood and hurts more than it helps.
    – Lilienthal♦
    Jul 24 '16 at 18:01




    +1 for the first two paragraphs, -1 for the third. That myth is an utter falsehood and hurts more than it helps.
    – Lilienthal♦
    Jul 24 '16 at 18:01




    9




    9




    At this point we may just want to create a new question about that old classic because I see it come up at least once a week. As mentioned here (external) there is some value to that advice but a plain "first to give a number loses" is so black-and-white that it's silly.
    – Lilienthal♦
    Jul 24 '16 at 18:22





    At this point we may just want to create a new question about that old classic because I see it come up at least once a week. As mentioned here (external) there is some value to that advice but a plain "first to give a number loses" is so black-and-white that it's silly.
    – Lilienthal♦
    Jul 24 '16 at 18:22





    1




    1




    Furthermore what does average even mean? By city, years of experience, company? That company with that many years of experience? Java, C++, Ruby on Rails, full stack? Masters or bachelors? Ivy or community college? What hired.com says? What other people in your graduating class made? Be prepared to see statistics for what "average" is that you don't like. They will have data, you will not be able to argue against it because it will be correct. You just won't like it. (This happened to me in a negotiation once. We correctly refused to even read the report.)
    – user42272
    Jul 24 '16 at 21:25





    Furthermore what does average even mean? By city, years of experience, company? That company with that many years of experience? Java, C++, Ruby on Rails, full stack? Masters or bachelors? Ivy or community college? What hired.com says? What other people in your graduating class made? Be prepared to see statistics for what "average" is that you don't like. They will have data, you will not be able to argue against it because it will be correct. You just won't like it. (This happened to me in a negotiation once. We correctly refused to even read the report.)
    – user42272
    Jul 24 '16 at 21:25





    1




    1




    I strongly disagree. What that other person made is relevant to the value the company place in the job being asked in this position.
    – njzk2
    Jul 24 '16 at 21:49




    I strongly disagree. What that other person made is relevant to the value the company place in the job being asked in this position.
    – njzk2
    Jul 24 '16 at 21:49




    1




    1




    @njzk2 I don't think that's always entirely correct. Sometimes, the other person might be what the company was valuing so high - not necessarily the position.
    – DoubleDouble
    Jul 25 '16 at 5:00




    @njzk2 I don't think that's always entirely correct. Sometimes, the other person might be what the company was valuing so high - not necessarily the position.
    – DoubleDouble
    Jul 25 '16 at 5:00










    up vote
    7
    down vote













    Some questions to ask to yourself



    1. Do you have the same education as Joe


    2. Do you have the same work experience as Joe


    3. Do you think that you will perform at this job position the same as Joe,
      or even better


    4. Has Joe earned this salary from day one


    You have to compare same situations and don't get greedy. You don't have to mention Joe's salary. What I would do is I would allow some room for negotiation but not immediately, in like 3-6 months. You can ask your boss during the meeting, that you know that it will be your first time for this assignment but you are definitely sure that you can deliver even better results and if that's the case ask if they will be willing to renegotiate salary in 3-6 months.






    share|improve this answer





















    • It's the other way around. You are taking Joe's responsibility because they want it that way. They already think you can do as good or better. Regardless of education and such.
      – Neolisk
      Jul 25 '16 at 16:58














    up vote
    7
    down vote













    Some questions to ask to yourself



    1. Do you have the same education as Joe


    2. Do you have the same work experience as Joe


    3. Do you think that you will perform at this job position the same as Joe,
      or even better


    4. Has Joe earned this salary from day one


    You have to compare same situations and don't get greedy. You don't have to mention Joe's salary. What I would do is I would allow some room for negotiation but not immediately, in like 3-6 months. You can ask your boss during the meeting, that you know that it will be your first time for this assignment but you are definitely sure that you can deliver even better results and if that's the case ask if they will be willing to renegotiate salary in 3-6 months.






    share|improve this answer





















    • It's the other way around. You are taking Joe's responsibility because they want it that way. They already think you can do as good or better. Regardless of education and such.
      – Neolisk
      Jul 25 '16 at 16:58












    up vote
    7
    down vote










    up vote
    7
    down vote









    Some questions to ask to yourself



    1. Do you have the same education as Joe


    2. Do you have the same work experience as Joe


    3. Do you think that you will perform at this job position the same as Joe,
      or even better


    4. Has Joe earned this salary from day one


    You have to compare same situations and don't get greedy. You don't have to mention Joe's salary. What I would do is I would allow some room for negotiation but not immediately, in like 3-6 months. You can ask your boss during the meeting, that you know that it will be your first time for this assignment but you are definitely sure that you can deliver even better results and if that's the case ask if they will be willing to renegotiate salary in 3-6 months.






    share|improve this answer













    Some questions to ask to yourself



    1. Do you have the same education as Joe


    2. Do you have the same work experience as Joe


    3. Do you think that you will perform at this job position the same as Joe,
      or even better


    4. Has Joe earned this salary from day one


    You have to compare same situations and don't get greedy. You don't have to mention Joe's salary. What I would do is I would allow some room for negotiation but not immediately, in like 3-6 months. You can ask your boss during the meeting, that you know that it will be your first time for this assignment but you are definitely sure that you can deliver even better results and if that's the case ask if they will be willing to renegotiate salary in 3-6 months.







    share|improve this answer













    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer











    answered Jul 25 '16 at 8:59









    mentalic

    21111




    21111











    • It's the other way around. You are taking Joe's responsibility because they want it that way. They already think you can do as good or better. Regardless of education and such.
      – Neolisk
      Jul 25 '16 at 16:58
















    • It's the other way around. You are taking Joe's responsibility because they want it that way. They already think you can do as good or better. Regardless of education and such.
      – Neolisk
      Jul 25 '16 at 16:58















    It's the other way around. You are taking Joe's responsibility because they want it that way. They already think you can do as good or better. Regardless of education and such.
    – Neolisk
    Jul 25 '16 at 16:58




    It's the other way around. You are taking Joe's responsibility because they want it that way. They already think you can do as good or better. Regardless of education and such.
    – Neolisk
    Jul 25 '16 at 16:58










    up vote
    1
    down vote













    I would consider it improper for you to know what "Old Joe" made, and therefore I would not reveal any such knowledge.



    You received a promotion (congratulations ...!) and you are there to discuss an offer. Do you consider this compensation to be fair and appropriate ("nevermind old Joe ...") for you?



    Effectively, the company is "buying a product," namely, "your professional services." Are they offering to pay an agreeable price? If you seriously believe that they are offering less money than you would or should accept, then you should be prepared to present counter-arguments at the negotiating table ... "nevermind "Old Joe!"   Joe's not the one who's negotiating, and he's not the one who's going to get the money ... you are.






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      I would consider it improper for you to know what "Old Joe" made, and therefore I would not reveal any such knowledge.



      You received a promotion (congratulations ...!) and you are there to discuss an offer. Do you consider this compensation to be fair and appropriate ("nevermind old Joe ...") for you?



      Effectively, the company is "buying a product," namely, "your professional services." Are they offering to pay an agreeable price? If you seriously believe that they are offering less money than you would or should accept, then you should be prepared to present counter-arguments at the negotiating table ... "nevermind "Old Joe!"   Joe's not the one who's negotiating, and he's not the one who's going to get the money ... you are.






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        I would consider it improper for you to know what "Old Joe" made, and therefore I would not reveal any such knowledge.



        You received a promotion (congratulations ...!) and you are there to discuss an offer. Do you consider this compensation to be fair and appropriate ("nevermind old Joe ...") for you?



        Effectively, the company is "buying a product," namely, "your professional services." Are they offering to pay an agreeable price? If you seriously believe that they are offering less money than you would or should accept, then you should be prepared to present counter-arguments at the negotiating table ... "nevermind "Old Joe!"   Joe's not the one who's negotiating, and he's not the one who's going to get the money ... you are.






        share|improve this answer













        I would consider it improper for you to know what "Old Joe" made, and therefore I would not reveal any such knowledge.



        You received a promotion (congratulations ...!) and you are there to discuss an offer. Do you consider this compensation to be fair and appropriate ("nevermind old Joe ...") for you?



        Effectively, the company is "buying a product," namely, "your professional services." Are they offering to pay an agreeable price? If you seriously believe that they are offering less money than you would or should accept, then you should be prepared to present counter-arguments at the negotiating table ... "nevermind "Old Joe!"   Joe's not the one who's negotiating, and he's not the one who's going to get the money ... you are.







        share|improve this answer













        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer











        answered Jul 26 '16 at 14:16









        Mike Robinson

        1,9021410




        1,9021410




















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            The discussion could go roughly as follows. First, you state that you expect (suspect, know for sure) that Joe Bloggs was making more money than are being offered to you. Second, you compare the value you would be producing for the company on your new position as compared to the value produced by Joe Bloggs. This is where things get tricky.



            If Joe Bloggs is moving to greener pastures (or higher up etc.), he might be worth even more than he was paid, and might have been producing that much of value. So, you (a) propose some tangible performance goals that might be a bit less than Joe Bloggs' real achievements, but are in line with the salary he had. And then (b) try to meet or exceed them.



            Your position is strenghtened by the fact that they could not keep Joe Bloggs on this position for these money, so you don't have to be as good as him to be worth that much.






            share|improve this answer

















            • 2




              -1 because you are not talking about you, but talking about some ex-employee Joe and makes you seem entitled. The best way to get what you want is talk about you. How would you like if you were being paid less because that's what Joe was being paid?
              – Burhan Khalid
              Jul 25 '16 at 7:58










            • @BurhanKhalid If he was paid less and left, and I would be as good as him, I'd follow suit unless I would be paid more. It's the market. I do not understand how you read "entitled" into my answer.
              – Eugene Ryabtsev
              Jul 25 '16 at 8:40














            up vote
            0
            down vote













            The discussion could go roughly as follows. First, you state that you expect (suspect, know for sure) that Joe Bloggs was making more money than are being offered to you. Second, you compare the value you would be producing for the company on your new position as compared to the value produced by Joe Bloggs. This is where things get tricky.



            If Joe Bloggs is moving to greener pastures (or higher up etc.), he might be worth even more than he was paid, and might have been producing that much of value. So, you (a) propose some tangible performance goals that might be a bit less than Joe Bloggs' real achievements, but are in line with the salary he had. And then (b) try to meet or exceed them.



            Your position is strenghtened by the fact that they could not keep Joe Bloggs on this position for these money, so you don't have to be as good as him to be worth that much.






            share|improve this answer

















            • 2




              -1 because you are not talking about you, but talking about some ex-employee Joe and makes you seem entitled. The best way to get what you want is talk about you. How would you like if you were being paid less because that's what Joe was being paid?
              – Burhan Khalid
              Jul 25 '16 at 7:58










            • @BurhanKhalid If he was paid less and left, and I would be as good as him, I'd follow suit unless I would be paid more. It's the market. I do not understand how you read "entitled" into my answer.
              – Eugene Ryabtsev
              Jul 25 '16 at 8:40












            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            The discussion could go roughly as follows. First, you state that you expect (suspect, know for sure) that Joe Bloggs was making more money than are being offered to you. Second, you compare the value you would be producing for the company on your new position as compared to the value produced by Joe Bloggs. This is where things get tricky.



            If Joe Bloggs is moving to greener pastures (or higher up etc.), he might be worth even more than he was paid, and might have been producing that much of value. So, you (a) propose some tangible performance goals that might be a bit less than Joe Bloggs' real achievements, but are in line with the salary he had. And then (b) try to meet or exceed them.



            Your position is strenghtened by the fact that they could not keep Joe Bloggs on this position for these money, so you don't have to be as good as him to be worth that much.






            share|improve this answer













            The discussion could go roughly as follows. First, you state that you expect (suspect, know for sure) that Joe Bloggs was making more money than are being offered to you. Second, you compare the value you would be producing for the company on your new position as compared to the value produced by Joe Bloggs. This is where things get tricky.



            If Joe Bloggs is moving to greener pastures (or higher up etc.), he might be worth even more than he was paid, and might have been producing that much of value. So, you (a) propose some tangible performance goals that might be a bit less than Joe Bloggs' real achievements, but are in line with the salary he had. And then (b) try to meet or exceed them.



            Your position is strenghtened by the fact that they could not keep Joe Bloggs on this position for these money, so you don't have to be as good as him to be worth that much.







            share|improve this answer













            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer











            answered Jul 25 '16 at 5:17









            Eugene Ryabtsev

            1091




            1091







            • 2




              -1 because you are not talking about you, but talking about some ex-employee Joe and makes you seem entitled. The best way to get what you want is talk about you. How would you like if you were being paid less because that's what Joe was being paid?
              – Burhan Khalid
              Jul 25 '16 at 7:58










            • @BurhanKhalid If he was paid less and left, and I would be as good as him, I'd follow suit unless I would be paid more. It's the market. I do not understand how you read "entitled" into my answer.
              – Eugene Ryabtsev
              Jul 25 '16 at 8:40












            • 2




              -1 because you are not talking about you, but talking about some ex-employee Joe and makes you seem entitled. The best way to get what you want is talk about you. How would you like if you were being paid less because that's what Joe was being paid?
              – Burhan Khalid
              Jul 25 '16 at 7:58










            • @BurhanKhalid If he was paid less and left, and I would be as good as him, I'd follow suit unless I would be paid more. It's the market. I do not understand how you read "entitled" into my answer.
              – Eugene Ryabtsev
              Jul 25 '16 at 8:40







            2




            2




            -1 because you are not talking about you, but talking about some ex-employee Joe and makes you seem entitled. The best way to get what you want is talk about you. How would you like if you were being paid less because that's what Joe was being paid?
            – Burhan Khalid
            Jul 25 '16 at 7:58




            -1 because you are not talking about you, but talking about some ex-employee Joe and makes you seem entitled. The best way to get what you want is talk about you. How would you like if you were being paid less because that's what Joe was being paid?
            – Burhan Khalid
            Jul 25 '16 at 7:58












            @BurhanKhalid If he was paid less and left, and I would be as good as him, I'd follow suit unless I would be paid more. It's the market. I do not understand how you read "entitled" into my answer.
            – Eugene Ryabtsev
            Jul 25 '16 at 8:40




            @BurhanKhalid If he was paid less and left, and I would be as good as him, I'd follow suit unless I would be paid more. It's the market. I do not understand how you read "entitled" into my answer.
            – Eugene Ryabtsev
            Jul 25 '16 at 8:40












             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f71954%2fhow-can-i-ask-for-my-salary-to-match-what-the-person-im-replacing-got%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest

















































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What does second last employer means? [closed]

            List of Gilmore Girls characters

            Confectionery