The review is harder than i expected

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite












I recently agreed to review a journal paper. After I started to read it in depth, I found out it is much harder than I expected - over 60 pages with over 20 theorems with detailed proofs. Also, the topic is not exactly my expertise - I do not know a lot of the related works that the authors base their results on.
So far, I managed to verify about 10 of the shorter theorems. They seem correct, though I have some minor comments. The other theorems seem so long and complex that it will take me weeks to review, especially if I would need to read and understand the theorems in the cited papers that these theorems are based on. What should I do?



I thought of writing to the editor and explaining the situation in detail. Maybe the editor will be able to find another reviewer that will verify the other theorems. But I do not know how such letter will be perceived. In particular:



  • Is it common for a reviewer to review only a part of the paper, and leave the rest of the paper to other reviewers?

  • On the other hand: is it my duty, as a reviewer, to complete my review, regardless of how much time it takes?





peer-review







share|improve this question

















  • 1




    Typical reviewing times vary a lot between pure math, different parts of applied math, CS, etc. What (sub)field does the journal live in?
    – user37208
    1 hour ago















up vote
5
down vote

favorite












I recently agreed to review a journal paper. After I started to read it in depth, I found out it is much harder than I expected - over 60 pages with over 20 theorems with detailed proofs. Also, the topic is not exactly my expertise - I do not know a lot of the related works that the authors base their results on.
So far, I managed to verify about 10 of the shorter theorems. They seem correct, though I have some minor comments. The other theorems seem so long and complex that it will take me weeks to review, especially if I would need to read and understand the theorems in the cited papers that these theorems are based on. What should I do?



I thought of writing to the editor and explaining the situation in detail. Maybe the editor will be able to find another reviewer that will verify the other theorems. But I do not know how such letter will be perceived. In particular:



  • Is it common for a reviewer to review only a part of the paper, and leave the rest of the paper to other reviewers?

  • On the other hand: is it my duty, as a reviewer, to complete my review, regardless of how much time it takes?





peer-review







share|improve this question

















  • 1




    Typical reviewing times vary a lot between pure math, different parts of applied math, CS, etc. What (sub)field does the journal live in?
    – user37208
    1 hour ago













up vote
5
down vote

favorite









up vote
5
down vote

favorite











I recently agreed to review a journal paper. After I started to read it in depth, I found out it is much harder than I expected - over 60 pages with over 20 theorems with detailed proofs. Also, the topic is not exactly my expertise - I do not know a lot of the related works that the authors base their results on.
So far, I managed to verify about 10 of the shorter theorems. They seem correct, though I have some minor comments. The other theorems seem so long and complex that it will take me weeks to review, especially if I would need to read and understand the theorems in the cited papers that these theorems are based on. What should I do?



I thought of writing to the editor and explaining the situation in detail. Maybe the editor will be able to find another reviewer that will verify the other theorems. But I do not know how such letter will be perceived. In particular:



  • Is it common for a reviewer to review only a part of the paper, and leave the rest of the paper to other reviewers?

  • On the other hand: is it my duty, as a reviewer, to complete my review, regardless of how much time it takes?





peer-review







share|improve this question













I recently agreed to review a journal paper. After I started to read it in depth, I found out it is much harder than I expected - over 60 pages with over 20 theorems with detailed proofs. Also, the topic is not exactly my expertise - I do not know a lot of the related works that the authors base their results on.
So far, I managed to verify about 10 of the shorter theorems. They seem correct, though I have some minor comments. The other theorems seem so long and complex that it will take me weeks to review, especially if I would need to read and understand the theorems in the cited papers that these theorems are based on. What should I do?



I thought of writing to the editor and explaining the situation in detail. Maybe the editor will be able to find another reviewer that will verify the other theorems. But I do not know how such letter will be perceived. In particular:



  • Is it common for a reviewer to review only a part of the paper, and leave the rest of the paper to other reviewers?

  • On the other hand: is it my duty, as a reviewer, to complete my review, regardless of how much time it takes?





peer-review




peer-review






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









Erel Segal-Halevi

6,16793866




6,16793866







  • 1




    Typical reviewing times vary a lot between pure math, different parts of applied math, CS, etc. What (sub)field does the journal live in?
    – user37208
    1 hour ago













  • 1




    Typical reviewing times vary a lot between pure math, different parts of applied math, CS, etc. What (sub)field does the journal live in?
    – user37208
    1 hour ago








1




1




Typical reviewing times vary a lot between pure math, different parts of applied math, CS, etc. What (sub)field does the journal live in?
– user37208
1 hour ago





Typical reviewing times vary a lot between pure math, different parts of applied math, CS, etc. What (sub)field does the journal live in?
– user37208
1 hour ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote














Is it common for a reviewer to review only a part of the paper, and leave the rest of the paper to other reviewers?




I have done that on at least two occasions. Sometimes it is the only honest option.




On the other hand: is it my duty, as a reviewer, to complete my review, regardless of how much time it takes?




Not really. It is commonly considered a duty of a career mathematician to contribute to peer review of mathematical works (at least) proportionally to their own publishing. Whether you achieve this by refereeing some really tough papers or a lot of simple ones is up to you.






share|improve this answer




















    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "415"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f118657%2fthe-review-is-harder-than-i-expected%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest

















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    5
    down vote














    Is it common for a reviewer to review only a part of the paper, and leave the rest of the paper to other reviewers?




    I have done that on at least two occasions. Sometimes it is the only honest option.




    On the other hand: is it my duty, as a reviewer, to complete my review, regardless of how much time it takes?




    Not really. It is commonly considered a duty of a career mathematician to contribute to peer review of mathematical works (at least) proportionally to their own publishing. Whether you achieve this by refereeing some really tough papers or a lot of simple ones is up to you.






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      5
      down vote














      Is it common for a reviewer to review only a part of the paper, and leave the rest of the paper to other reviewers?




      I have done that on at least two occasions. Sometimes it is the only honest option.




      On the other hand: is it my duty, as a reviewer, to complete my review, regardless of how much time it takes?




      Not really. It is commonly considered a duty of a career mathematician to contribute to peer review of mathematical works (at least) proportionally to their own publishing. Whether you achieve this by refereeing some really tough papers or a lot of simple ones is up to you.






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        5
        down vote










        up vote
        5
        down vote










        Is it common for a reviewer to review only a part of the paper, and leave the rest of the paper to other reviewers?




        I have done that on at least two occasions. Sometimes it is the only honest option.




        On the other hand: is it my duty, as a reviewer, to complete my review, regardless of how much time it takes?




        Not really. It is commonly considered a duty of a career mathematician to contribute to peer review of mathematical works (at least) proportionally to their own publishing. Whether you achieve this by refereeing some really tough papers or a lot of simple ones is up to you.






        share|improve this answer













        Is it common for a reviewer to review only a part of the paper, and leave the rest of the paper to other reviewers?




        I have done that on at least two occasions. Sometimes it is the only honest option.




        On the other hand: is it my duty, as a reviewer, to complete my review, regardless of how much time it takes?




        Not really. It is commonly considered a duty of a career mathematician to contribute to peer review of mathematical works (at least) proportionally to their own publishing. Whether you achieve this by refereeing some really tough papers or a lot of simple ones is up to you.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        darij grinberg

        1,6431816




        1,6431816



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f118657%2fthe-review-is-harder-than-i-expected%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest
































































            Comments

            Post a Comment

            Popular posts from this blog

            What does second last employer means? [closed]

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote -3 down vote favorite Say, for example I have worked in the following companies, Company A => 2010 - 2011 Company B => 2011 - 2012 Company C => 2012 - Till Date Company D => Have offer Now assume Company D is asking to submit documents from my second last employer. So from the list of companies given, which company would be qualified as second last employer? software-industry employer share | improve this question asked Aug 10 '14 at 5:16 Rajaprabhu Aravindasamy 559 1 6 13 closed as off-topic by Jim G., jmort253 ♦ Aug 11 '14 at 1:58 This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason: "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address...
            Read more

            Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote 1 down vote favorite Just acquired free version of NEXTGIS and trying to install the plugin for QGIS. It tells me it was not designed for version 3 of QGIS. How do I set up the QGIS-NEXTGIS interface then? qgis qgis-plugins nextgis share | improve this question edited 3 hours ago PolyGeo ♦ 51.9k 17 77 233 asked 4 hours ago IanGS 16 4 New contributor IanGS is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct. add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite Just acquired free version of NEXTGIS and trying to install the plugin for QGIS. It tells me it was not designed for version 3 of QGIS. How do I set up the QGIS-NEXTGIS interface then? qgis qgis-plugin...
            Read more

            One-line joke

            A one-liner is a joke that is delivered in a single line. A good one-liner is said to be pithy - concise and meaningful. [1] Comedians and actors use this comedic method as part of their act, e.g. Jimmy Carr, Tommy Cooper, Rodney Dangerfield, Norm Macdonald, Ken Dodd, Stewart Francis, Zach Galifianakis, Mitch Hedberg, Anthony Jeselnik, Milton Jones, Shappi Khorsandi, Jay London, Mark Linn-Baker, Demetri Martin, Groucho Marx, Dan Mintz, Emo Philips, Tim Vine, Steven Wright and Henny Youngman and Arnold Schwarzenegger. [ citation needed ] Many fictional characters are also known to deliver one-liners, including James Bond, who usually includes pithy and laconic quips after disposing of a villain. [ citation needed ] Examples "A baby seal walks into a club." "A dyslexic man walks into a bra." (Anonymous) "There are three types of people, those who can count and those who can't." "Venison's dear, isn't it?" (Jimmy Carr) "An escala...
            Read more