Very long dashes in Victorian-era book
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
I am trying to faithfully recreate the typographic style of a Victorian era book. One thing I've noticed is the extensive use of dashes: em-dashes are everywhere, for example.
Beyond the em dash however, I notice a set of even longer dashes. For example the dash used to indicate a pause in conversation due to a sudden interruption is about 1.5 times the length of an em dash. A similarly long dash is used to indicate the missing part of a name, e.g. "He traveled by horse to W-----".
How can I go about defining and working with dashes longer than an em dash. I can't seem to find any information on the web? I'm using XeLaTeX for my work.
punctuation
add a comment |Â
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
I am trying to faithfully recreate the typographic style of a Victorian era book. One thing I've noticed is the extensive use of dashes: em-dashes are everywhere, for example.
Beyond the em dash however, I notice a set of even longer dashes. For example the dash used to indicate a pause in conversation due to a sudden interruption is about 1.5 times the length of an em dash. A similarly long dash is used to indicate the missing part of a name, e.g. "He traveled by horse to W-----".
How can I go about defining and working with dashes longer than an em dash. I can't seem to find any information on the web? I'm using XeLaTeX for my work.
punctuation
1
See also tex.stackexchange.com/q/447557 If your fonts support it, you can use Unicode’s omission dash.
– Thérèse
Sep 7 at 19:23
1
For those wondering why old books do that in the first place, it's discussed on English.SE.
– Wildcard
Sep 8 at 1:31
If your goal is to faithfully recreate the typography of the original book, wouldn't it be more accurate to use a series of dashes? I believe that's what was typically used at the time, as Victorian-era typesetters wouldn't have had access to sorts (i.e, special pieces of movable type) for abnormally long dashes either.
– duskwuff
Sep 8 at 22:54
add a comment |Â
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
I am trying to faithfully recreate the typographic style of a Victorian era book. One thing I've noticed is the extensive use of dashes: em-dashes are everywhere, for example.
Beyond the em dash however, I notice a set of even longer dashes. For example the dash used to indicate a pause in conversation due to a sudden interruption is about 1.5 times the length of an em dash. A similarly long dash is used to indicate the missing part of a name, e.g. "He traveled by horse to W-----".
How can I go about defining and working with dashes longer than an em dash. I can't seem to find any information on the web? I'm using XeLaTeX for my work.
punctuation
I am trying to faithfully recreate the typographic style of a Victorian era book. One thing I've noticed is the extensive use of dashes: em-dashes are everywhere, for example.
Beyond the em dash however, I notice a set of even longer dashes. For example the dash used to indicate a pause in conversation due to a sudden interruption is about 1.5 times the length of an em dash. A similarly long dash is used to indicate the missing part of a name, e.g. "He traveled by horse to W-----".
How can I go about defining and working with dashes longer than an em dash. I can't seem to find any information on the web? I'm using XeLaTeX for my work.
punctuation
asked Sep 7 at 19:09
A. Ahmad
1137
1137
1
See also tex.stackexchange.com/q/447557 If your fonts support it, you can use Unicode’s omission dash.
– Thérèse
Sep 7 at 19:23
1
For those wondering why old books do that in the first place, it's discussed on English.SE.
– Wildcard
Sep 8 at 1:31
If your goal is to faithfully recreate the typography of the original book, wouldn't it be more accurate to use a series of dashes? I believe that's what was typically used at the time, as Victorian-era typesetters wouldn't have had access to sorts (i.e, special pieces of movable type) for abnormally long dashes either.
– duskwuff
Sep 8 at 22:54
add a comment |Â
1
See also tex.stackexchange.com/q/447557 If your fonts support it, you can use Unicode’s omission dash.
– Thérèse
Sep 7 at 19:23
1
For those wondering why old books do that in the first place, it's discussed on English.SE.
– Wildcard
Sep 8 at 1:31
If your goal is to faithfully recreate the typography of the original book, wouldn't it be more accurate to use a series of dashes? I believe that's what was typically used at the time, as Victorian-era typesetters wouldn't have had access to sorts (i.e, special pieces of movable type) for abnormally long dashes either.
– duskwuff
Sep 8 at 22:54
1
1
See also tex.stackexchange.com/q/447557 If your fonts support it, you can use Unicode’s omission dash.
– Thérèse
Sep 7 at 19:23
See also tex.stackexchange.com/q/447557 If your fonts support it, you can use Unicode’s omission dash.
– Thérèse
Sep 7 at 19:23
1
1
For those wondering why old books do that in the first place, it's discussed on English.SE.
– Wildcard
Sep 8 at 1:31
For those wondering why old books do that in the first place, it's discussed on English.SE.
– Wildcard
Sep 8 at 1:31
If your goal is to faithfully recreate the typography of the original book, wouldn't it be more accurate to use a series of dashes? I believe that's what was typically used at the time, as Victorian-era typesetters wouldn't have had access to sorts (i.e, special pieces of movable type) for abnormally long dashes either.
– duskwuff
Sep 8 at 22:54
If your goal is to faithfully recreate the typography of the original book, wouldn't it be more accurate to use a series of dashes? I believe that's what was typically used at the time, as Victorian-era typesetters wouldn't have had access to sorts (i.e, special pieces of movable type) for abnormally long dashes either.
– duskwuff
Sep 8 at 22:54
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
You can superimpose two em-dashes:
newcommandemmdash---kern-0.5em---
Full example:
documentclassarticle
newcommandemmdash---kern-0.5em---
begindocument
``He traveled by horse to Wemmdashâ€Â
-- --- emmdash
enddocument
1
At first you suggested something likehbox to 1.5em---hss---
. Is there a significant difference between both methods?
– Phelype Oleinik
Sep 7 at 19:24
1
@PhelypeOleinik The current version respects possible kernings with characters before and after the dash.
– egreg
Sep 7 at 19:25
1
The overlaid portions appear somewhat darker.
– AlexG
Sep 7 at 19:28
1
@AlexG Artifact. I added a high resolution screenshot.
– egreg
Sep 7 at 19:31
1
Very creative solution. Thank you!
– A. Ahmad
Sep 7 at 19:36
add a comment |Â
up vote
12
down vote
You can use a Latex "rule" to create a thin rectangle.
documentclassarticle
begindocument
He travelled by horse to Wrule[0.5ex]3em0.5pt
enddocument
the format is rule[raise]width-xthickness-y
(source)and this can of course be used in a newcommand
for convenience.
By using "ex" and "em" units, the rule should scale nicely with the font.
New contributor
James K is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
You can superimpose two em-dashes:
newcommandemmdash---kern-0.5em---
Full example:
documentclassarticle
newcommandemmdash---kern-0.5em---
begindocument
``He traveled by horse to Wemmdashâ€Â
-- --- emmdash
enddocument
1
At first you suggested something likehbox to 1.5em---hss---
. Is there a significant difference between both methods?
– Phelype Oleinik
Sep 7 at 19:24
1
@PhelypeOleinik The current version respects possible kernings with characters before and after the dash.
– egreg
Sep 7 at 19:25
1
The overlaid portions appear somewhat darker.
– AlexG
Sep 7 at 19:28
1
@AlexG Artifact. I added a high resolution screenshot.
– egreg
Sep 7 at 19:31
1
Very creative solution. Thank you!
– A. Ahmad
Sep 7 at 19:36
add a comment |Â
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
You can superimpose two em-dashes:
newcommandemmdash---kern-0.5em---
Full example:
documentclassarticle
newcommandemmdash---kern-0.5em---
begindocument
``He traveled by horse to Wemmdashâ€Â
-- --- emmdash
enddocument
1
At first you suggested something likehbox to 1.5em---hss---
. Is there a significant difference between both methods?
– Phelype Oleinik
Sep 7 at 19:24
1
@PhelypeOleinik The current version respects possible kernings with characters before and after the dash.
– egreg
Sep 7 at 19:25
1
The overlaid portions appear somewhat darker.
– AlexG
Sep 7 at 19:28
1
@AlexG Artifact. I added a high resolution screenshot.
– egreg
Sep 7 at 19:31
1
Very creative solution. Thank you!
– A. Ahmad
Sep 7 at 19:36
add a comment |Â
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
You can superimpose two em-dashes:
newcommandemmdash---kern-0.5em---
Full example:
documentclassarticle
newcommandemmdash---kern-0.5em---
begindocument
``He traveled by horse to Wemmdashâ€Â
-- --- emmdash
enddocument
You can superimpose two em-dashes:
newcommandemmdash---kern-0.5em---
Full example:
documentclassarticle
newcommandemmdash---kern-0.5em---
begindocument
``He traveled by horse to Wemmdashâ€Â
-- --- emmdash
enddocument
edited Sep 7 at 19:32
answered Sep 7 at 19:13


egreg
681k8318113058
681k8318113058
1
At first you suggested something likehbox to 1.5em---hss---
. Is there a significant difference between both methods?
– Phelype Oleinik
Sep 7 at 19:24
1
@PhelypeOleinik The current version respects possible kernings with characters before and after the dash.
– egreg
Sep 7 at 19:25
1
The overlaid portions appear somewhat darker.
– AlexG
Sep 7 at 19:28
1
@AlexG Artifact. I added a high resolution screenshot.
– egreg
Sep 7 at 19:31
1
Very creative solution. Thank you!
– A. Ahmad
Sep 7 at 19:36
add a comment |Â
1
At first you suggested something likehbox to 1.5em---hss---
. Is there a significant difference between both methods?
– Phelype Oleinik
Sep 7 at 19:24
1
@PhelypeOleinik The current version respects possible kernings with characters before and after the dash.
– egreg
Sep 7 at 19:25
1
The overlaid portions appear somewhat darker.
– AlexG
Sep 7 at 19:28
1
@AlexG Artifact. I added a high resolution screenshot.
– egreg
Sep 7 at 19:31
1
Very creative solution. Thank you!
– A. Ahmad
Sep 7 at 19:36
1
1
At first you suggested something like
hbox to 1.5em---hss---
. Is there a significant difference between both methods?– Phelype Oleinik
Sep 7 at 19:24
At first you suggested something like
hbox to 1.5em---hss---
. Is there a significant difference between both methods?– Phelype Oleinik
Sep 7 at 19:24
1
1
@PhelypeOleinik The current version respects possible kernings with characters before and after the dash.
– egreg
Sep 7 at 19:25
@PhelypeOleinik The current version respects possible kernings with characters before and after the dash.
– egreg
Sep 7 at 19:25
1
1
The overlaid portions appear somewhat darker.
– AlexG
Sep 7 at 19:28
The overlaid portions appear somewhat darker.
– AlexG
Sep 7 at 19:28
1
1
@AlexG Artifact. I added a high resolution screenshot.
– egreg
Sep 7 at 19:31
@AlexG Artifact. I added a high resolution screenshot.
– egreg
Sep 7 at 19:31
1
1
Very creative solution. Thank you!
– A. Ahmad
Sep 7 at 19:36
Very creative solution. Thank you!
– A. Ahmad
Sep 7 at 19:36
add a comment |Â
up vote
12
down vote
You can use a Latex "rule" to create a thin rectangle.
documentclassarticle
begindocument
He travelled by horse to Wrule[0.5ex]3em0.5pt
enddocument
the format is rule[raise]width-xthickness-y
(source)and this can of course be used in a newcommand
for convenience.
By using "ex" and "em" units, the rule should scale nicely with the font.
New contributor
James K is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
12
down vote
You can use a Latex "rule" to create a thin rectangle.
documentclassarticle
begindocument
He travelled by horse to Wrule[0.5ex]3em0.5pt
enddocument
the format is rule[raise]width-xthickness-y
(source)and this can of course be used in a newcommand
for convenience.
By using "ex" and "em" units, the rule should scale nicely with the font.
New contributor
James K is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
12
down vote
up vote
12
down vote
You can use a Latex "rule" to create a thin rectangle.
documentclassarticle
begindocument
He travelled by horse to Wrule[0.5ex]3em0.5pt
enddocument
the format is rule[raise]width-xthickness-y
(source)and this can of course be used in a newcommand
for convenience.
By using "ex" and "em" units, the rule should scale nicely with the font.
New contributor
James K is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
You can use a Latex "rule" to create a thin rectangle.
documentclassarticle
begindocument
He travelled by horse to Wrule[0.5ex]3em0.5pt
enddocument
the format is rule[raise]width-xthickness-y
(source)and this can of course be used in a newcommand
for convenience.
By using "ex" and "em" units, the rule should scale nicely with the font.
New contributor
James K is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
James K is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Sep 7 at 20:45
James K
22114
22114
New contributor
James K is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
James K is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
James K is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f449901%2fvery-long-dashes-in-victorian-era-book%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
See also tex.stackexchange.com/q/447557 If your fonts support it, you can use Unicode’s omission dash.
– Thérèse
Sep 7 at 19:23
1
For those wondering why old books do that in the first place, it's discussed on English.SE.
– Wildcard
Sep 8 at 1:31
If your goal is to faithfully recreate the typography of the original book, wouldn't it be more accurate to use a series of dashes? I believe that's what was typically used at the time, as Victorian-era typesetters wouldn't have had access to sorts (i.e, special pieces of movable type) for abnormally long dashes either.
– duskwuff
Sep 8 at 22:54