Are there disadvantages of heat shrink tubing with higher shrink ratios?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
14
down vote

favorite












Heat shrink tubing comes in various shrink ratios. The most common of which is 2:1, but there are also 3:1, 4:1 and higher. Assuming cost is the same, are there any disadvantages or consideration points when using higher ratios?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Bill Tarbell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • "assuming the cost is the same" I wish it was
    – Mark Omo
    yesterday
















up vote
14
down vote

favorite












Heat shrink tubing comes in various shrink ratios. The most common of which is 2:1, but there are also 3:1, 4:1 and higher. Assuming cost is the same, are there any disadvantages or consideration points when using higher ratios?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Bill Tarbell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • "assuming the cost is the same" I wish it was
    – Mark Omo
    yesterday












up vote
14
down vote

favorite









up vote
14
down vote

favorite











Heat shrink tubing comes in various shrink ratios. The most common of which is 2:1, but there are also 3:1, 4:1 and higher. Assuming cost is the same, are there any disadvantages or consideration points when using higher ratios?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Bill Tarbell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Heat shrink tubing comes in various shrink ratios. The most common of which is 2:1, but there are also 3:1, 4:1 and higher. Assuming cost is the same, are there any disadvantages or consideration points when using higher ratios?







insulation






share|improve this question







New contributor




Bill Tarbell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Bill Tarbell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Bill Tarbell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









Bill Tarbell

1805




1805




New contributor




Bill Tarbell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Bill Tarbell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Bill Tarbell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • "assuming the cost is the same" I wish it was
    – Mark Omo
    yesterday
















  • "assuming the cost is the same" I wish it was
    – Mark Omo
    yesterday















"assuming the cost is the same" I wish it was
– Mark Omo
yesterday




"assuming the cost is the same" I wish it was
– Mark Omo
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
19
down vote



accepted










One small disadvantage I've found is that the wall of a high shrink ratio tube can get quite thick when shrunk.



If your joint has some small diameter sections then the high ratio tube might shrink all the way, conforming tightly to the wire, and become quite stiff compared to a 2:1 tube.



There's also a problem of asymmetry. If the shrink-er doesn't use an air deflector or turn the joint while heating it, one side of the tube will shrink first, making it asymmetrical. A 2:1 tube suffers less from this as it can't go so wrong.






share|improve this answer
















  • 8




    The increased stiffness can also be a blessing in certain situations.
    – pipe
    yesterday










  • @pipe can you elaborate?
    – Criggie
    yesterday






  • 9




    @Criggie For example if you use heat shrink tubing around a solder joint between two wires you can get some amount of strain relief if the tubing is stiff. Or between a wire and a pin header: ni.com/cms/images/devzone/tut/image6391225987748786482.png
    – pipe
    yesterday










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Bill Tarbell is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f395401%2fare-there-disadvantages-of-heat-shrink-tubing-with-higher-shrink-ratios%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
19
down vote



accepted










One small disadvantage I've found is that the wall of a high shrink ratio tube can get quite thick when shrunk.



If your joint has some small diameter sections then the high ratio tube might shrink all the way, conforming tightly to the wire, and become quite stiff compared to a 2:1 tube.



There's also a problem of asymmetry. If the shrink-er doesn't use an air deflector or turn the joint while heating it, one side of the tube will shrink first, making it asymmetrical. A 2:1 tube suffers less from this as it can't go so wrong.






share|improve this answer
















  • 8




    The increased stiffness can also be a blessing in certain situations.
    – pipe
    yesterday










  • @pipe can you elaborate?
    – Criggie
    yesterday






  • 9




    @Criggie For example if you use heat shrink tubing around a solder joint between two wires you can get some amount of strain relief if the tubing is stiff. Or between a wire and a pin header: ni.com/cms/images/devzone/tut/image6391225987748786482.png
    – pipe
    yesterday














up vote
19
down vote



accepted










One small disadvantage I've found is that the wall of a high shrink ratio tube can get quite thick when shrunk.



If your joint has some small diameter sections then the high ratio tube might shrink all the way, conforming tightly to the wire, and become quite stiff compared to a 2:1 tube.



There's also a problem of asymmetry. If the shrink-er doesn't use an air deflector or turn the joint while heating it, one side of the tube will shrink first, making it asymmetrical. A 2:1 tube suffers less from this as it can't go so wrong.






share|improve this answer
















  • 8




    The increased stiffness can also be a blessing in certain situations.
    – pipe
    yesterday










  • @pipe can you elaborate?
    – Criggie
    yesterday






  • 9




    @Criggie For example if you use heat shrink tubing around a solder joint between two wires you can get some amount of strain relief if the tubing is stiff. Or between a wire and a pin header: ni.com/cms/images/devzone/tut/image6391225987748786482.png
    – pipe
    yesterday












up vote
19
down vote



accepted







up vote
19
down vote



accepted






One small disadvantage I've found is that the wall of a high shrink ratio tube can get quite thick when shrunk.



If your joint has some small diameter sections then the high ratio tube might shrink all the way, conforming tightly to the wire, and become quite stiff compared to a 2:1 tube.



There's also a problem of asymmetry. If the shrink-er doesn't use an air deflector or turn the joint while heating it, one side of the tube will shrink first, making it asymmetrical. A 2:1 tube suffers less from this as it can't go so wrong.






share|improve this answer












One small disadvantage I've found is that the wall of a high shrink ratio tube can get quite thick when shrunk.



If your joint has some small diameter sections then the high ratio tube might shrink all the way, conforming tightly to the wire, and become quite stiff compared to a 2:1 tube.



There's also a problem of asymmetry. If the shrink-er doesn't use an air deflector or turn the joint while heating it, one side of the tube will shrink first, making it asymmetrical. A 2:1 tube suffers less from this as it can't go so wrong.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









tomnexus

5,2821826




5,2821826







  • 8




    The increased stiffness can also be a blessing in certain situations.
    – pipe
    yesterday










  • @pipe can you elaborate?
    – Criggie
    yesterday






  • 9




    @Criggie For example if you use heat shrink tubing around a solder joint between two wires you can get some amount of strain relief if the tubing is stiff. Or between a wire and a pin header: ni.com/cms/images/devzone/tut/image6391225987748786482.png
    – pipe
    yesterday












  • 8




    The increased stiffness can also be a blessing in certain situations.
    – pipe
    yesterday










  • @pipe can you elaborate?
    – Criggie
    yesterday






  • 9




    @Criggie For example if you use heat shrink tubing around a solder joint between two wires you can get some amount of strain relief if the tubing is stiff. Or between a wire and a pin header: ni.com/cms/images/devzone/tut/image6391225987748786482.png
    – pipe
    yesterday







8




8




The increased stiffness can also be a blessing in certain situations.
– pipe
yesterday




The increased stiffness can also be a blessing in certain situations.
– pipe
yesterday












@pipe can you elaborate?
– Criggie
yesterday




@pipe can you elaborate?
– Criggie
yesterday




9




9




@Criggie For example if you use heat shrink tubing around a solder joint between two wires you can get some amount of strain relief if the tubing is stiff. Or between a wire and a pin header: ni.com/cms/images/devzone/tut/image6391225987748786482.png
– pipe
yesterday




@Criggie For example if you use heat shrink tubing around a solder joint between two wires you can get some amount of strain relief if the tubing is stiff. Or between a wire and a pin header: ni.com/cms/images/devzone/tut/image6391225987748786482.png
– pipe
yesterday










Bill Tarbell is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















Bill Tarbell is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Bill Tarbell is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Bill Tarbell is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f395401%2fare-there-disadvantages-of-heat-shrink-tubing-with-higher-shrink-ratios%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What does second last employer means? [closed]

Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

One-line joke