Does a long exposure in DSLR camera have a similar effect to a global shutter?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












Regular DSLRs make use of mechanical shutters and progressive electrical readouts, and hence images are captured in a rolling shutter.



But, when used to capture pictures with a long exposure, where the entire sensor is open for an extended duration, are all pixels of a sensor exposed simultaneously? The readout will definitely be sequential rows of pixels, but will the data acquired in every pixel correspond to a simultaneous event?



The reason to ask this question is to understand whether a DSLR camera may be suitable for an academic research purpose.










share|improve this question



















  • 1




    This video by the Slow Mo guys is an excellent insight into how a rolling shutter works
    – binaryfunt
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @binaryfunt I love that video and the Slo-Mo guys. Related, this question deals specifically with that video: If a rolling shutter travels from top to bottom, why does this image seem to show skew in the other direction?
    – scottbb
    yesterday
















up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












Regular DSLRs make use of mechanical shutters and progressive electrical readouts, and hence images are captured in a rolling shutter.



But, when used to capture pictures with a long exposure, where the entire sensor is open for an extended duration, are all pixels of a sensor exposed simultaneously? The readout will definitely be sequential rows of pixels, but will the data acquired in every pixel correspond to a simultaneous event?



The reason to ask this question is to understand whether a DSLR camera may be suitable for an academic research purpose.










share|improve this question



















  • 1




    This video by the Slow Mo guys is an excellent insight into how a rolling shutter works
    – binaryfunt
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @binaryfunt I love that video and the Slo-Mo guys. Related, this question deals specifically with that video: If a rolling shutter travels from top to bottom, why does this image seem to show skew in the other direction?
    – scottbb
    yesterday












up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1






1





Regular DSLRs make use of mechanical shutters and progressive electrical readouts, and hence images are captured in a rolling shutter.



But, when used to capture pictures with a long exposure, where the entire sensor is open for an extended duration, are all pixels of a sensor exposed simultaneously? The readout will definitely be sequential rows of pixels, but will the data acquired in every pixel correspond to a simultaneous event?



The reason to ask this question is to understand whether a DSLR camera may be suitable for an academic research purpose.










share|improve this question















Regular DSLRs make use of mechanical shutters and progressive electrical readouts, and hence images are captured in a rolling shutter.



But, when used to capture pictures with a long exposure, where the entire sensor is open for an extended duration, are all pixels of a sensor exposed simultaneously? The readout will definitely be sequential rows of pixels, but will the data acquired in every pixel correspond to a simultaneous event?



The reason to ask this question is to understand whether a DSLR camera may be suitable for an academic research purpose.







sensor camera-settings long-exposure science rolling-shutter






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









psmears

1472




1472










asked 2 days ago









karthikeyan

1445




1445







  • 1




    This video by the Slow Mo guys is an excellent insight into how a rolling shutter works
    – binaryfunt
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @binaryfunt I love that video and the Slo-Mo guys. Related, this question deals specifically with that video: If a rolling shutter travels from top to bottom, why does this image seem to show skew in the other direction?
    – scottbb
    yesterday












  • 1




    This video by the Slow Mo guys is an excellent insight into how a rolling shutter works
    – binaryfunt
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @binaryfunt I love that video and the Slo-Mo guys. Related, this question deals specifically with that video: If a rolling shutter travels from top to bottom, why does this image seem to show skew in the other direction?
    – scottbb
    yesterday







1




1




This video by the Slow Mo guys is an excellent insight into how a rolling shutter works
– binaryfunt
2 days ago




This video by the Slow Mo guys is an excellent insight into how a rolling shutter works
– binaryfunt
2 days ago




1




1




@binaryfunt I love that video and the Slo-Mo guys. Related, this question deals specifically with that video: If a rolling shutter travels from top to bottom, why does this image seem to show skew in the other direction?
– scottbb
yesterday




@binaryfunt I love that video and the Slo-Mo guys. Related, this question deals specifically with that video: If a rolling shutter travels from top to bottom, why does this image seem to show skew in the other direction?
– scottbb
yesterday










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
11
down vote













I think you've slightly misunderstood how the shutter works. Initially, the first shutter covers the sensor and the second does not. The first shutter then slides away to expose the sensor, and the second shutter follows it to cover the sensor again. The shutters always move at the same speed, regardless of the exposure time.



For a short exposure, the second shutter will start to close off the sensor before the first shutter has finished opening it. The effect is that an open slit moves across the sensor, with the width depending on the desired exposure time. For longer exposures, though, there are three phases: the first shutter opens all the way, the sensor spends some time completely uncovered, and then the second shutter closes. In this case, all pixels are indeed exposed simultaneously, except briefly at the start and end of the exposure.






share|improve this answer




















  • Also, at very high speeds, (1/8000 for example), the two shutters, which are independent, can be moving at slightly different speeds so you may see a subtle difference in light levels from the bottom of the image to the top as the effective shutter aperture changes. Usually not noticeable but can be mostly compensated by a multiplying gradient in Photoshop. The larger effect is the timing differences which can elongate or shorten moving objects along the vertical.
    – doug
    2 days ago






  • 2




    A visual: thumbs.gfycat.com/ColdFamiliarGrayreefshark-small.gif
    – Corey Ogburn
    yesterday






  • 1




    @MichaelClark Thanks for the info on the film SLRs. I wasn't aware they had horizontal shutters. It always seemed to me that horizontal shutters would be a better choice than vertical since images typically have horizontally moving objects like people or cars and vertical shutters cause a slight tilt which is more noticeable than the elongation from horizontal shutters which only tilts things moving up/down. Always assumed that physics/engineering provided compelling reasons for the vertical placement overriding horizontal placement.
    – doug
    yesterday







  • 1




    Horizontal worked better when the lever used to wind film to the next frame in a horizontal direction also recocked the spring driven shutter curtains. For the same curtain speed, transit times are longer for horizontal travel (in a 3:2 'landscape' format such as 135 film) because the curtains have 36mm to travel instead of 24mm. That's the main advantage of vertical travel shutters, which were first introduced to the 135 format in significant numbers when shutters became electronically, rather than spring, driven. Shorter transit times enable shorter X-sync.
    – Michael Clark
    yesterday







  • 1




    The other issue with film SLRs was that they usually had cloth or rubberized fabric curtains that spooled or remained flat on either side of the opening it the back of the light box. There wasn't room for a vertical travel cloth curtain in SLRs (because the viewfinder prism needed that space directly above the light box). Only when metal shutter curtains with segmented 'leaves' were introduced was there room in SLRs for a vertical travel shutter. Medium format cameras, on the other hand, normally wound film and the focal plane shutter (if the camera had one) in the horizontal direction.
    – Michael Clark
    yesterday


















up vote
7
down vote













Most DSLRs have shutter curtains that transit the face of the sensor in approximately 2-4 milliseconds. For any particular camera model, barring a mechanical malfunction, the transit time for each shutter curtain will always be the same, regardless of the exposure time. This is the case with shutter times anywhere from 1/8000 second, where the second curtain is 'chasing' the first curtain across the sensor a small fraction of a millisecond behind it, to Bulb mode, where the offset between when exposure begins and ends on one side of the sensor to the other is still that same 2-4 milliseconds.



For a 1/8000 second exposure, a 4 millisecond offset is roughly 32X the length of the exposure.



For an 8 second exposure, the same 4 millisecond offset is a miniscule 0.0005X of the total exposure time.



How readout is done is inconsequential for still images, since it is performed when no light is reaching the sensor after the shutter curtains are closed.




Reason to ask this question is to understand whether a DSLR camera be suitable for an academic research purpose.




Even top level professional cameras are not what would be considered 'lab grade'. The precision required for creative/historical/documentary photography is relatively low. Anything within one-sixth stop is considered acceptable for a camera with minimum adjustments of 1/3 stop for aperture (Av), exposure time (Tv), and sensitivity (ISO). In terms of exposure time measured in seconds or fractions thereof, one-sixth stop is roughly 12%. So if a camera is set to take a photo using a shutter time of 1/250 second (4ms), anything between 1/285 second (3.52ms) to 1/225 second (4.48ms) is considered acceptable.



The other thing to remember is that the numbers we use in the "standard" shutter speed scale are not the actual target numbers. They're rounded versions of the powers of two that were selected at a time when cameras were even much less precise than they are today. For example, what we call 1/250 second is actually 1/256 second (which means we give or take that allowable 12% time variation from 1/256, rather than from 1/250)! So the allowable window for our named 1/250 shutter time is actually +/- 12% of 1/256 seconds, which figures out to between 1/229 seconds (rounded to the nearest whole denominator) and 1/291 seconds (rounded to the nearest whole denominator). But since we like to round numbers to the nearest "5" in photography, we'll call them 1/230 and 1/290 seconds, respectively.



For more about marked numbers versus target numbers versus actual numbers used and why it doesn't really matter for creative/documentary/historical photography, please see: Is there a sane reason why ¹â„₁₂₅ is not, instead, exactly half of ¹â„₆₀?




My application involves using an extremely short pulse laser to freeze motion(as short a duration as 9ns). So I was worried whether rolling shutter will kick in even at long exposures and make my regular camera unsuitable for the experiment.




Yes, as long as the first curtain is already fully open when the light pulse begins, and the second curtain has not yet begun to close when the light pulse ends, the entire sensor will be illuminated by the entire duration of the light pulse. For still images the sensor is only read out once following the end of the exposure. There is no 'scanning' going on while the shutter is open.



As long as your laser pulse is significantly shorter in duration than the camera's flash sync speed (typically around 1/200-1/250 seconds or 5-4 milliseconds), you might consider using the camera's flash sync capability to trigger the laser. (How to do that would probably need to be a separate question.)



We also have some existing questions about high speed photography using very short pulses of light, rather than short shutter times, to freeze the motion of high speed objects. Among them:



What problems might there be with using a laser as a flash source for high speed photography?
How can I capture the movement of a bullet?
How do I trigger the flash in a way that takes luck out of high-speed photography?
Why doesn't a shutter speed of ¹â„â‚‚â‚…â‚€th freeze motion when a flash of that duration does?






share|improve this answer


















  • 2




    Wow! Thanks for the extended answer about clarifying about the camera grades. My application involves using an extremely short pulse laser to freeze motion(as short a duration as 9ns). So I was worried whether rolling shutter will kick in even at long exposures and make my regular camera unsuitable for the experiment. Actually I think the dslr is superior in terms of number of pixels it can pack. I have to give it a try to see if it will be suitable.
    – karthikeyan
    2 days ago

















up vote
3
down vote













It is still the same shutter, even in long exposure and pixels are not exposed simultaneously.



However, the time difference (in relation to the total exposure time) becomes smaller as the exposure time increases. It might become insignificant depending on your requirements.



If you cannot tolerate rolling shutter at all, you still have 2 options:



  • use external global shutter

  • use flash (the shutter opens and closes in darkness, flash illuminates the whole scene simultaneously)





share|improve this answer




















  • I am looking at trying the 2nd option. Hope rolling shutter would not create any issues
    – karthikeyan
    2 days ago










  • Would rolling shutter even be a problem with long exposure? I mean, what does 1/16000 second matter when the shutter is open a total 2 or 3 seconds, or 10 seconds?
    – user69960
    2 days ago






  • 1




    realistic shutter travel time is probably closer to 1/500 sec but yes, i doubt it really makes a difference for long exposures where most of the exposure is captured simultaneously for all pixels.
    – szulat
    2 days ago

















up vote
2
down vote













CMOS pixels are reset and then gather the cumulative charge from the light they receive until they are read & reset again. The CMOS is usually reset, the shutter process takes place (front curtain, delay, then rear curtain) and then values are read.



Because of the mechanical process, there will always be a short period during the shutter opening/closing events where the sensor is partially obscured.



If this affects you will depend on what type of event you are attempting to capture with a long exposure. If you're hoping to capture a bright but unpredictable event like lightning then it's possible that a shutter curtain could be half-closed during the event. If you're looking for something under more constant lighting conditions then the 1/125 or 1/250th sec that are needed would be inconsequential in an exposure of 1 sec or more.






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    For the purpose you describe: Yes, all pixels are exposed simultaneously; they work independently, in parallel. Even for the short periods of time at start and finish, they're still all working together - but the shutter will need some time to get out of the way completely.



    So if a short event were to happen during the long exposure, what you will get is a simultaneous read across the surface of the sensor.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Andy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.

















      Your Answer







      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "61"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f101345%2fdoes-a-long-exposure-in-dslr-camera-have-a-similar-effect-to-a-global-shutter%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      11
      down vote













      I think you've slightly misunderstood how the shutter works. Initially, the first shutter covers the sensor and the second does not. The first shutter then slides away to expose the sensor, and the second shutter follows it to cover the sensor again. The shutters always move at the same speed, regardless of the exposure time.



      For a short exposure, the second shutter will start to close off the sensor before the first shutter has finished opening it. The effect is that an open slit moves across the sensor, with the width depending on the desired exposure time. For longer exposures, though, there are three phases: the first shutter opens all the way, the sensor spends some time completely uncovered, and then the second shutter closes. In this case, all pixels are indeed exposed simultaneously, except briefly at the start and end of the exposure.






      share|improve this answer




















      • Also, at very high speeds, (1/8000 for example), the two shutters, which are independent, can be moving at slightly different speeds so you may see a subtle difference in light levels from the bottom of the image to the top as the effective shutter aperture changes. Usually not noticeable but can be mostly compensated by a multiplying gradient in Photoshop. The larger effect is the timing differences which can elongate or shorten moving objects along the vertical.
        – doug
        2 days ago






      • 2




        A visual: thumbs.gfycat.com/ColdFamiliarGrayreefshark-small.gif
        – Corey Ogburn
        yesterday






      • 1




        @MichaelClark Thanks for the info on the film SLRs. I wasn't aware they had horizontal shutters. It always seemed to me that horizontal shutters would be a better choice than vertical since images typically have horizontally moving objects like people or cars and vertical shutters cause a slight tilt which is more noticeable than the elongation from horizontal shutters which only tilts things moving up/down. Always assumed that physics/engineering provided compelling reasons for the vertical placement overriding horizontal placement.
        – doug
        yesterday







      • 1




        Horizontal worked better when the lever used to wind film to the next frame in a horizontal direction also recocked the spring driven shutter curtains. For the same curtain speed, transit times are longer for horizontal travel (in a 3:2 'landscape' format such as 135 film) because the curtains have 36mm to travel instead of 24mm. That's the main advantage of vertical travel shutters, which were first introduced to the 135 format in significant numbers when shutters became electronically, rather than spring, driven. Shorter transit times enable shorter X-sync.
        – Michael Clark
        yesterday







      • 1




        The other issue with film SLRs was that they usually had cloth or rubberized fabric curtains that spooled or remained flat on either side of the opening it the back of the light box. There wasn't room for a vertical travel cloth curtain in SLRs (because the viewfinder prism needed that space directly above the light box). Only when metal shutter curtains with segmented 'leaves' were introduced was there room in SLRs for a vertical travel shutter. Medium format cameras, on the other hand, normally wound film and the focal plane shutter (if the camera had one) in the horizontal direction.
        – Michael Clark
        yesterday















      up vote
      11
      down vote













      I think you've slightly misunderstood how the shutter works. Initially, the first shutter covers the sensor and the second does not. The first shutter then slides away to expose the sensor, and the second shutter follows it to cover the sensor again. The shutters always move at the same speed, regardless of the exposure time.



      For a short exposure, the second shutter will start to close off the sensor before the first shutter has finished opening it. The effect is that an open slit moves across the sensor, with the width depending on the desired exposure time. For longer exposures, though, there are three phases: the first shutter opens all the way, the sensor spends some time completely uncovered, and then the second shutter closes. In this case, all pixels are indeed exposed simultaneously, except briefly at the start and end of the exposure.






      share|improve this answer




















      • Also, at very high speeds, (1/8000 for example), the two shutters, which are independent, can be moving at slightly different speeds so you may see a subtle difference in light levels from the bottom of the image to the top as the effective shutter aperture changes. Usually not noticeable but can be mostly compensated by a multiplying gradient in Photoshop. The larger effect is the timing differences which can elongate or shorten moving objects along the vertical.
        – doug
        2 days ago






      • 2




        A visual: thumbs.gfycat.com/ColdFamiliarGrayreefshark-small.gif
        – Corey Ogburn
        yesterday






      • 1




        @MichaelClark Thanks for the info on the film SLRs. I wasn't aware they had horizontal shutters. It always seemed to me that horizontal shutters would be a better choice than vertical since images typically have horizontally moving objects like people or cars and vertical shutters cause a slight tilt which is more noticeable than the elongation from horizontal shutters which only tilts things moving up/down. Always assumed that physics/engineering provided compelling reasons for the vertical placement overriding horizontal placement.
        – doug
        yesterday







      • 1




        Horizontal worked better when the lever used to wind film to the next frame in a horizontal direction also recocked the spring driven shutter curtains. For the same curtain speed, transit times are longer for horizontal travel (in a 3:2 'landscape' format such as 135 film) because the curtains have 36mm to travel instead of 24mm. That's the main advantage of vertical travel shutters, which were first introduced to the 135 format in significant numbers when shutters became electronically, rather than spring, driven. Shorter transit times enable shorter X-sync.
        – Michael Clark
        yesterday







      • 1




        The other issue with film SLRs was that they usually had cloth or rubberized fabric curtains that spooled or remained flat on either side of the opening it the back of the light box. There wasn't room for a vertical travel cloth curtain in SLRs (because the viewfinder prism needed that space directly above the light box). Only when metal shutter curtains with segmented 'leaves' were introduced was there room in SLRs for a vertical travel shutter. Medium format cameras, on the other hand, normally wound film and the focal plane shutter (if the camera had one) in the horizontal direction.
        – Michael Clark
        yesterday













      up vote
      11
      down vote










      up vote
      11
      down vote









      I think you've slightly misunderstood how the shutter works. Initially, the first shutter covers the sensor and the second does not. The first shutter then slides away to expose the sensor, and the second shutter follows it to cover the sensor again. The shutters always move at the same speed, regardless of the exposure time.



      For a short exposure, the second shutter will start to close off the sensor before the first shutter has finished opening it. The effect is that an open slit moves across the sensor, with the width depending on the desired exposure time. For longer exposures, though, there are three phases: the first shutter opens all the way, the sensor spends some time completely uncovered, and then the second shutter closes. In this case, all pixels are indeed exposed simultaneously, except briefly at the start and end of the exposure.






      share|improve this answer












      I think you've slightly misunderstood how the shutter works. Initially, the first shutter covers the sensor and the second does not. The first shutter then slides away to expose the sensor, and the second shutter follows it to cover the sensor again. The shutters always move at the same speed, regardless of the exposure time.



      For a short exposure, the second shutter will start to close off the sensor before the first shutter has finished opening it. The effect is that an open slit moves across the sensor, with the width depending on the desired exposure time. For longer exposures, though, there are three phases: the first shutter opens all the way, the sensor spends some time completely uncovered, and then the second shutter closes. In this case, all pixels are indeed exposed simultaneously, except briefly at the start and end of the exposure.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 2 days ago









      David Richerby

      922817




      922817











      • Also, at very high speeds, (1/8000 for example), the two shutters, which are independent, can be moving at slightly different speeds so you may see a subtle difference in light levels from the bottom of the image to the top as the effective shutter aperture changes. Usually not noticeable but can be mostly compensated by a multiplying gradient in Photoshop. The larger effect is the timing differences which can elongate or shorten moving objects along the vertical.
        – doug
        2 days ago






      • 2




        A visual: thumbs.gfycat.com/ColdFamiliarGrayreefshark-small.gif
        – Corey Ogburn
        yesterday






      • 1




        @MichaelClark Thanks for the info on the film SLRs. I wasn't aware they had horizontal shutters. It always seemed to me that horizontal shutters would be a better choice than vertical since images typically have horizontally moving objects like people or cars and vertical shutters cause a slight tilt which is more noticeable than the elongation from horizontal shutters which only tilts things moving up/down. Always assumed that physics/engineering provided compelling reasons for the vertical placement overriding horizontal placement.
        – doug
        yesterday







      • 1




        Horizontal worked better when the lever used to wind film to the next frame in a horizontal direction also recocked the spring driven shutter curtains. For the same curtain speed, transit times are longer for horizontal travel (in a 3:2 'landscape' format such as 135 film) because the curtains have 36mm to travel instead of 24mm. That's the main advantage of vertical travel shutters, which were first introduced to the 135 format in significant numbers when shutters became electronically, rather than spring, driven. Shorter transit times enable shorter X-sync.
        – Michael Clark
        yesterday







      • 1




        The other issue with film SLRs was that they usually had cloth or rubberized fabric curtains that spooled or remained flat on either side of the opening it the back of the light box. There wasn't room for a vertical travel cloth curtain in SLRs (because the viewfinder prism needed that space directly above the light box). Only when metal shutter curtains with segmented 'leaves' were introduced was there room in SLRs for a vertical travel shutter. Medium format cameras, on the other hand, normally wound film and the focal plane shutter (if the camera had one) in the horizontal direction.
        – Michael Clark
        yesterday

















      • Also, at very high speeds, (1/8000 for example), the two shutters, which are independent, can be moving at slightly different speeds so you may see a subtle difference in light levels from the bottom of the image to the top as the effective shutter aperture changes. Usually not noticeable but can be mostly compensated by a multiplying gradient in Photoshop. The larger effect is the timing differences which can elongate or shorten moving objects along the vertical.
        – doug
        2 days ago






      • 2




        A visual: thumbs.gfycat.com/ColdFamiliarGrayreefshark-small.gif
        – Corey Ogburn
        yesterday






      • 1




        @MichaelClark Thanks for the info on the film SLRs. I wasn't aware they had horizontal shutters. It always seemed to me that horizontal shutters would be a better choice than vertical since images typically have horizontally moving objects like people or cars and vertical shutters cause a slight tilt which is more noticeable than the elongation from horizontal shutters which only tilts things moving up/down. Always assumed that physics/engineering provided compelling reasons for the vertical placement overriding horizontal placement.
        – doug
        yesterday







      • 1




        Horizontal worked better when the lever used to wind film to the next frame in a horizontal direction also recocked the spring driven shutter curtains. For the same curtain speed, transit times are longer for horizontal travel (in a 3:2 'landscape' format such as 135 film) because the curtains have 36mm to travel instead of 24mm. That's the main advantage of vertical travel shutters, which were first introduced to the 135 format in significant numbers when shutters became electronically, rather than spring, driven. Shorter transit times enable shorter X-sync.
        – Michael Clark
        yesterday







      • 1




        The other issue with film SLRs was that they usually had cloth or rubberized fabric curtains that spooled or remained flat on either side of the opening it the back of the light box. There wasn't room for a vertical travel cloth curtain in SLRs (because the viewfinder prism needed that space directly above the light box). Only when metal shutter curtains with segmented 'leaves' were introduced was there room in SLRs for a vertical travel shutter. Medium format cameras, on the other hand, normally wound film and the focal plane shutter (if the camera had one) in the horizontal direction.
        – Michael Clark
        yesterday
















      Also, at very high speeds, (1/8000 for example), the two shutters, which are independent, can be moving at slightly different speeds so you may see a subtle difference in light levels from the bottom of the image to the top as the effective shutter aperture changes. Usually not noticeable but can be mostly compensated by a multiplying gradient in Photoshop. The larger effect is the timing differences which can elongate or shorten moving objects along the vertical.
      – doug
      2 days ago




      Also, at very high speeds, (1/8000 for example), the two shutters, which are independent, can be moving at slightly different speeds so you may see a subtle difference in light levels from the bottom of the image to the top as the effective shutter aperture changes. Usually not noticeable but can be mostly compensated by a multiplying gradient in Photoshop. The larger effect is the timing differences which can elongate or shorten moving objects along the vertical.
      – doug
      2 days ago




      2




      2




      A visual: thumbs.gfycat.com/ColdFamiliarGrayreefshark-small.gif
      – Corey Ogburn
      yesterday




      A visual: thumbs.gfycat.com/ColdFamiliarGrayreefshark-small.gif
      – Corey Ogburn
      yesterday




      1




      1




      @MichaelClark Thanks for the info on the film SLRs. I wasn't aware they had horizontal shutters. It always seemed to me that horizontal shutters would be a better choice than vertical since images typically have horizontally moving objects like people or cars and vertical shutters cause a slight tilt which is more noticeable than the elongation from horizontal shutters which only tilts things moving up/down. Always assumed that physics/engineering provided compelling reasons for the vertical placement overriding horizontal placement.
      – doug
      yesterday





      @MichaelClark Thanks for the info on the film SLRs. I wasn't aware they had horizontal shutters. It always seemed to me that horizontal shutters would be a better choice than vertical since images typically have horizontally moving objects like people or cars and vertical shutters cause a slight tilt which is more noticeable than the elongation from horizontal shutters which only tilts things moving up/down. Always assumed that physics/engineering provided compelling reasons for the vertical placement overriding horizontal placement.
      – doug
      yesterday





      1




      1




      Horizontal worked better when the lever used to wind film to the next frame in a horizontal direction also recocked the spring driven shutter curtains. For the same curtain speed, transit times are longer for horizontal travel (in a 3:2 'landscape' format such as 135 film) because the curtains have 36mm to travel instead of 24mm. That's the main advantage of vertical travel shutters, which were first introduced to the 135 format in significant numbers when shutters became electronically, rather than spring, driven. Shorter transit times enable shorter X-sync.
      – Michael Clark
      yesterday





      Horizontal worked better when the lever used to wind film to the next frame in a horizontal direction also recocked the spring driven shutter curtains. For the same curtain speed, transit times are longer for horizontal travel (in a 3:2 'landscape' format such as 135 film) because the curtains have 36mm to travel instead of 24mm. That's the main advantage of vertical travel shutters, which were first introduced to the 135 format in significant numbers when shutters became electronically, rather than spring, driven. Shorter transit times enable shorter X-sync.
      – Michael Clark
      yesterday





      1




      1




      The other issue with film SLRs was that they usually had cloth or rubberized fabric curtains that spooled or remained flat on either side of the opening it the back of the light box. There wasn't room for a vertical travel cloth curtain in SLRs (because the viewfinder prism needed that space directly above the light box). Only when metal shutter curtains with segmented 'leaves' were introduced was there room in SLRs for a vertical travel shutter. Medium format cameras, on the other hand, normally wound film and the focal plane shutter (if the camera had one) in the horizontal direction.
      – Michael Clark
      yesterday





      The other issue with film SLRs was that they usually had cloth or rubberized fabric curtains that spooled or remained flat on either side of the opening it the back of the light box. There wasn't room for a vertical travel cloth curtain in SLRs (because the viewfinder prism needed that space directly above the light box). Only when metal shutter curtains with segmented 'leaves' were introduced was there room in SLRs for a vertical travel shutter. Medium format cameras, on the other hand, normally wound film and the focal plane shutter (if the camera had one) in the horizontal direction.
      – Michael Clark
      yesterday













      up vote
      7
      down vote













      Most DSLRs have shutter curtains that transit the face of the sensor in approximately 2-4 milliseconds. For any particular camera model, barring a mechanical malfunction, the transit time for each shutter curtain will always be the same, regardless of the exposure time. This is the case with shutter times anywhere from 1/8000 second, where the second curtain is 'chasing' the first curtain across the sensor a small fraction of a millisecond behind it, to Bulb mode, where the offset between when exposure begins and ends on one side of the sensor to the other is still that same 2-4 milliseconds.



      For a 1/8000 second exposure, a 4 millisecond offset is roughly 32X the length of the exposure.



      For an 8 second exposure, the same 4 millisecond offset is a miniscule 0.0005X of the total exposure time.



      How readout is done is inconsequential for still images, since it is performed when no light is reaching the sensor after the shutter curtains are closed.




      Reason to ask this question is to understand whether a DSLR camera be suitable for an academic research purpose.




      Even top level professional cameras are not what would be considered 'lab grade'. The precision required for creative/historical/documentary photography is relatively low. Anything within one-sixth stop is considered acceptable for a camera with minimum adjustments of 1/3 stop for aperture (Av), exposure time (Tv), and sensitivity (ISO). In terms of exposure time measured in seconds or fractions thereof, one-sixth stop is roughly 12%. So if a camera is set to take a photo using a shutter time of 1/250 second (4ms), anything between 1/285 second (3.52ms) to 1/225 second (4.48ms) is considered acceptable.



      The other thing to remember is that the numbers we use in the "standard" shutter speed scale are not the actual target numbers. They're rounded versions of the powers of two that were selected at a time when cameras were even much less precise than they are today. For example, what we call 1/250 second is actually 1/256 second (which means we give or take that allowable 12% time variation from 1/256, rather than from 1/250)! So the allowable window for our named 1/250 shutter time is actually +/- 12% of 1/256 seconds, which figures out to between 1/229 seconds (rounded to the nearest whole denominator) and 1/291 seconds (rounded to the nearest whole denominator). But since we like to round numbers to the nearest "5" in photography, we'll call them 1/230 and 1/290 seconds, respectively.



      For more about marked numbers versus target numbers versus actual numbers used and why it doesn't really matter for creative/documentary/historical photography, please see: Is there a sane reason why ¹â„₁₂₅ is not, instead, exactly half of ¹â„₆₀?




      My application involves using an extremely short pulse laser to freeze motion(as short a duration as 9ns). So I was worried whether rolling shutter will kick in even at long exposures and make my regular camera unsuitable for the experiment.




      Yes, as long as the first curtain is already fully open when the light pulse begins, and the second curtain has not yet begun to close when the light pulse ends, the entire sensor will be illuminated by the entire duration of the light pulse. For still images the sensor is only read out once following the end of the exposure. There is no 'scanning' going on while the shutter is open.



      As long as your laser pulse is significantly shorter in duration than the camera's flash sync speed (typically around 1/200-1/250 seconds or 5-4 milliseconds), you might consider using the camera's flash sync capability to trigger the laser. (How to do that would probably need to be a separate question.)



      We also have some existing questions about high speed photography using very short pulses of light, rather than short shutter times, to freeze the motion of high speed objects. Among them:



      What problems might there be with using a laser as a flash source for high speed photography?
      How can I capture the movement of a bullet?
      How do I trigger the flash in a way that takes luck out of high-speed photography?
      Why doesn't a shutter speed of ¹â„â‚‚â‚…â‚€th freeze motion when a flash of that duration does?






      share|improve this answer


















      • 2




        Wow! Thanks for the extended answer about clarifying about the camera grades. My application involves using an extremely short pulse laser to freeze motion(as short a duration as 9ns). So I was worried whether rolling shutter will kick in even at long exposures and make my regular camera unsuitable for the experiment. Actually I think the dslr is superior in terms of number of pixels it can pack. I have to give it a try to see if it will be suitable.
        – karthikeyan
        2 days ago














      up vote
      7
      down vote













      Most DSLRs have shutter curtains that transit the face of the sensor in approximately 2-4 milliseconds. For any particular camera model, barring a mechanical malfunction, the transit time for each shutter curtain will always be the same, regardless of the exposure time. This is the case with shutter times anywhere from 1/8000 second, where the second curtain is 'chasing' the first curtain across the sensor a small fraction of a millisecond behind it, to Bulb mode, where the offset between when exposure begins and ends on one side of the sensor to the other is still that same 2-4 milliseconds.



      For a 1/8000 second exposure, a 4 millisecond offset is roughly 32X the length of the exposure.



      For an 8 second exposure, the same 4 millisecond offset is a miniscule 0.0005X of the total exposure time.



      How readout is done is inconsequential for still images, since it is performed when no light is reaching the sensor after the shutter curtains are closed.




      Reason to ask this question is to understand whether a DSLR camera be suitable for an academic research purpose.




      Even top level professional cameras are not what would be considered 'lab grade'. The precision required for creative/historical/documentary photography is relatively low. Anything within one-sixth stop is considered acceptable for a camera with minimum adjustments of 1/3 stop for aperture (Av), exposure time (Tv), and sensitivity (ISO). In terms of exposure time measured in seconds or fractions thereof, one-sixth stop is roughly 12%. So if a camera is set to take a photo using a shutter time of 1/250 second (4ms), anything between 1/285 second (3.52ms) to 1/225 second (4.48ms) is considered acceptable.



      The other thing to remember is that the numbers we use in the "standard" shutter speed scale are not the actual target numbers. They're rounded versions of the powers of two that were selected at a time when cameras were even much less precise than they are today. For example, what we call 1/250 second is actually 1/256 second (which means we give or take that allowable 12% time variation from 1/256, rather than from 1/250)! So the allowable window for our named 1/250 shutter time is actually +/- 12% of 1/256 seconds, which figures out to between 1/229 seconds (rounded to the nearest whole denominator) and 1/291 seconds (rounded to the nearest whole denominator). But since we like to round numbers to the nearest "5" in photography, we'll call them 1/230 and 1/290 seconds, respectively.



      For more about marked numbers versus target numbers versus actual numbers used and why it doesn't really matter for creative/documentary/historical photography, please see: Is there a sane reason why ¹â„₁₂₅ is not, instead, exactly half of ¹â„₆₀?




      My application involves using an extremely short pulse laser to freeze motion(as short a duration as 9ns). So I was worried whether rolling shutter will kick in even at long exposures and make my regular camera unsuitable for the experiment.




      Yes, as long as the first curtain is already fully open when the light pulse begins, and the second curtain has not yet begun to close when the light pulse ends, the entire sensor will be illuminated by the entire duration of the light pulse. For still images the sensor is only read out once following the end of the exposure. There is no 'scanning' going on while the shutter is open.



      As long as your laser pulse is significantly shorter in duration than the camera's flash sync speed (typically around 1/200-1/250 seconds or 5-4 milliseconds), you might consider using the camera's flash sync capability to trigger the laser. (How to do that would probably need to be a separate question.)



      We also have some existing questions about high speed photography using very short pulses of light, rather than short shutter times, to freeze the motion of high speed objects. Among them:



      What problems might there be with using a laser as a flash source for high speed photography?
      How can I capture the movement of a bullet?
      How do I trigger the flash in a way that takes luck out of high-speed photography?
      Why doesn't a shutter speed of ¹â„â‚‚â‚…â‚€th freeze motion when a flash of that duration does?






      share|improve this answer


















      • 2




        Wow! Thanks for the extended answer about clarifying about the camera grades. My application involves using an extremely short pulse laser to freeze motion(as short a duration as 9ns). So I was worried whether rolling shutter will kick in even at long exposures and make my regular camera unsuitable for the experiment. Actually I think the dslr is superior in terms of number of pixels it can pack. I have to give it a try to see if it will be suitable.
        – karthikeyan
        2 days ago












      up vote
      7
      down vote










      up vote
      7
      down vote









      Most DSLRs have shutter curtains that transit the face of the sensor in approximately 2-4 milliseconds. For any particular camera model, barring a mechanical malfunction, the transit time for each shutter curtain will always be the same, regardless of the exposure time. This is the case with shutter times anywhere from 1/8000 second, where the second curtain is 'chasing' the first curtain across the sensor a small fraction of a millisecond behind it, to Bulb mode, where the offset between when exposure begins and ends on one side of the sensor to the other is still that same 2-4 milliseconds.



      For a 1/8000 second exposure, a 4 millisecond offset is roughly 32X the length of the exposure.



      For an 8 second exposure, the same 4 millisecond offset is a miniscule 0.0005X of the total exposure time.



      How readout is done is inconsequential for still images, since it is performed when no light is reaching the sensor after the shutter curtains are closed.




      Reason to ask this question is to understand whether a DSLR camera be suitable for an academic research purpose.




      Even top level professional cameras are not what would be considered 'lab grade'. The precision required for creative/historical/documentary photography is relatively low. Anything within one-sixth stop is considered acceptable for a camera with minimum adjustments of 1/3 stop for aperture (Av), exposure time (Tv), and sensitivity (ISO). In terms of exposure time measured in seconds or fractions thereof, one-sixth stop is roughly 12%. So if a camera is set to take a photo using a shutter time of 1/250 second (4ms), anything between 1/285 second (3.52ms) to 1/225 second (4.48ms) is considered acceptable.



      The other thing to remember is that the numbers we use in the "standard" shutter speed scale are not the actual target numbers. They're rounded versions of the powers of two that were selected at a time when cameras were even much less precise than they are today. For example, what we call 1/250 second is actually 1/256 second (which means we give or take that allowable 12% time variation from 1/256, rather than from 1/250)! So the allowable window for our named 1/250 shutter time is actually +/- 12% of 1/256 seconds, which figures out to between 1/229 seconds (rounded to the nearest whole denominator) and 1/291 seconds (rounded to the nearest whole denominator). But since we like to round numbers to the nearest "5" in photography, we'll call them 1/230 and 1/290 seconds, respectively.



      For more about marked numbers versus target numbers versus actual numbers used and why it doesn't really matter for creative/documentary/historical photography, please see: Is there a sane reason why ¹â„₁₂₅ is not, instead, exactly half of ¹â„₆₀?




      My application involves using an extremely short pulse laser to freeze motion(as short a duration as 9ns). So I was worried whether rolling shutter will kick in even at long exposures and make my regular camera unsuitable for the experiment.




      Yes, as long as the first curtain is already fully open when the light pulse begins, and the second curtain has not yet begun to close when the light pulse ends, the entire sensor will be illuminated by the entire duration of the light pulse. For still images the sensor is only read out once following the end of the exposure. There is no 'scanning' going on while the shutter is open.



      As long as your laser pulse is significantly shorter in duration than the camera's flash sync speed (typically around 1/200-1/250 seconds or 5-4 milliseconds), you might consider using the camera's flash sync capability to trigger the laser. (How to do that would probably need to be a separate question.)



      We also have some existing questions about high speed photography using very short pulses of light, rather than short shutter times, to freeze the motion of high speed objects. Among them:



      What problems might there be with using a laser as a flash source for high speed photography?
      How can I capture the movement of a bullet?
      How do I trigger the flash in a way that takes luck out of high-speed photography?
      Why doesn't a shutter speed of ¹â„â‚‚â‚…â‚€th freeze motion when a flash of that duration does?






      share|improve this answer














      Most DSLRs have shutter curtains that transit the face of the sensor in approximately 2-4 milliseconds. For any particular camera model, barring a mechanical malfunction, the transit time for each shutter curtain will always be the same, regardless of the exposure time. This is the case with shutter times anywhere from 1/8000 second, where the second curtain is 'chasing' the first curtain across the sensor a small fraction of a millisecond behind it, to Bulb mode, where the offset between when exposure begins and ends on one side of the sensor to the other is still that same 2-4 milliseconds.



      For a 1/8000 second exposure, a 4 millisecond offset is roughly 32X the length of the exposure.



      For an 8 second exposure, the same 4 millisecond offset is a miniscule 0.0005X of the total exposure time.



      How readout is done is inconsequential for still images, since it is performed when no light is reaching the sensor after the shutter curtains are closed.




      Reason to ask this question is to understand whether a DSLR camera be suitable for an academic research purpose.




      Even top level professional cameras are not what would be considered 'lab grade'. The precision required for creative/historical/documentary photography is relatively low. Anything within one-sixth stop is considered acceptable for a camera with minimum adjustments of 1/3 stop for aperture (Av), exposure time (Tv), and sensitivity (ISO). In terms of exposure time measured in seconds or fractions thereof, one-sixth stop is roughly 12%. So if a camera is set to take a photo using a shutter time of 1/250 second (4ms), anything between 1/285 second (3.52ms) to 1/225 second (4.48ms) is considered acceptable.



      The other thing to remember is that the numbers we use in the "standard" shutter speed scale are not the actual target numbers. They're rounded versions of the powers of two that were selected at a time when cameras were even much less precise than they are today. For example, what we call 1/250 second is actually 1/256 second (which means we give or take that allowable 12% time variation from 1/256, rather than from 1/250)! So the allowable window for our named 1/250 shutter time is actually +/- 12% of 1/256 seconds, which figures out to between 1/229 seconds (rounded to the nearest whole denominator) and 1/291 seconds (rounded to the nearest whole denominator). But since we like to round numbers to the nearest "5" in photography, we'll call them 1/230 and 1/290 seconds, respectively.



      For more about marked numbers versus target numbers versus actual numbers used and why it doesn't really matter for creative/documentary/historical photography, please see: Is there a sane reason why ¹â„₁₂₅ is not, instead, exactly half of ¹â„₆₀?




      My application involves using an extremely short pulse laser to freeze motion(as short a duration as 9ns). So I was worried whether rolling shutter will kick in even at long exposures and make my regular camera unsuitable for the experiment.




      Yes, as long as the first curtain is already fully open when the light pulse begins, and the second curtain has not yet begun to close when the light pulse ends, the entire sensor will be illuminated by the entire duration of the light pulse. For still images the sensor is only read out once following the end of the exposure. There is no 'scanning' going on while the shutter is open.



      As long as your laser pulse is significantly shorter in duration than the camera's flash sync speed (typically around 1/200-1/250 seconds or 5-4 milliseconds), you might consider using the camera's flash sync capability to trigger the laser. (How to do that would probably need to be a separate question.)



      We also have some existing questions about high speed photography using very short pulses of light, rather than short shutter times, to freeze the motion of high speed objects. Among them:



      What problems might there be with using a laser as a flash source for high speed photography?
      How can I capture the movement of a bullet?
      How do I trigger the flash in a way that takes luck out of high-speed photography?
      Why doesn't a shutter speed of ¹â„â‚‚â‚…â‚€th freeze motion when a flash of that duration does?







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited yesterday

























      answered 2 days ago









      Michael Clark

      120k7136335




      120k7136335







      • 2




        Wow! Thanks for the extended answer about clarifying about the camera grades. My application involves using an extremely short pulse laser to freeze motion(as short a duration as 9ns). So I was worried whether rolling shutter will kick in even at long exposures and make my regular camera unsuitable for the experiment. Actually I think the dslr is superior in terms of number of pixels it can pack. I have to give it a try to see if it will be suitable.
        – karthikeyan
        2 days ago












      • 2




        Wow! Thanks for the extended answer about clarifying about the camera grades. My application involves using an extremely short pulse laser to freeze motion(as short a duration as 9ns). So I was worried whether rolling shutter will kick in even at long exposures and make my regular camera unsuitable for the experiment. Actually I think the dslr is superior in terms of number of pixels it can pack. I have to give it a try to see if it will be suitable.
        – karthikeyan
        2 days ago







      2




      2




      Wow! Thanks for the extended answer about clarifying about the camera grades. My application involves using an extremely short pulse laser to freeze motion(as short a duration as 9ns). So I was worried whether rolling shutter will kick in even at long exposures and make my regular camera unsuitable for the experiment. Actually I think the dslr is superior in terms of number of pixels it can pack. I have to give it a try to see if it will be suitable.
      – karthikeyan
      2 days ago




      Wow! Thanks for the extended answer about clarifying about the camera grades. My application involves using an extremely short pulse laser to freeze motion(as short a duration as 9ns). So I was worried whether rolling shutter will kick in even at long exposures and make my regular camera unsuitable for the experiment. Actually I think the dslr is superior in terms of number of pixels it can pack. I have to give it a try to see if it will be suitable.
      – karthikeyan
      2 days ago










      up vote
      3
      down vote













      It is still the same shutter, even in long exposure and pixels are not exposed simultaneously.



      However, the time difference (in relation to the total exposure time) becomes smaller as the exposure time increases. It might become insignificant depending on your requirements.



      If you cannot tolerate rolling shutter at all, you still have 2 options:



      • use external global shutter

      • use flash (the shutter opens and closes in darkness, flash illuminates the whole scene simultaneously)





      share|improve this answer




















      • I am looking at trying the 2nd option. Hope rolling shutter would not create any issues
        – karthikeyan
        2 days ago










      • Would rolling shutter even be a problem with long exposure? I mean, what does 1/16000 second matter when the shutter is open a total 2 or 3 seconds, or 10 seconds?
        – user69960
        2 days ago






      • 1




        realistic shutter travel time is probably closer to 1/500 sec but yes, i doubt it really makes a difference for long exposures where most of the exposure is captured simultaneously for all pixels.
        – szulat
        2 days ago














      up vote
      3
      down vote













      It is still the same shutter, even in long exposure and pixels are not exposed simultaneously.



      However, the time difference (in relation to the total exposure time) becomes smaller as the exposure time increases. It might become insignificant depending on your requirements.



      If you cannot tolerate rolling shutter at all, you still have 2 options:



      • use external global shutter

      • use flash (the shutter opens and closes in darkness, flash illuminates the whole scene simultaneously)





      share|improve this answer




















      • I am looking at trying the 2nd option. Hope rolling shutter would not create any issues
        – karthikeyan
        2 days ago










      • Would rolling shutter even be a problem with long exposure? I mean, what does 1/16000 second matter when the shutter is open a total 2 or 3 seconds, or 10 seconds?
        – user69960
        2 days ago






      • 1




        realistic shutter travel time is probably closer to 1/500 sec but yes, i doubt it really makes a difference for long exposures where most of the exposure is captured simultaneously for all pixels.
        – szulat
        2 days ago












      up vote
      3
      down vote










      up vote
      3
      down vote









      It is still the same shutter, even in long exposure and pixels are not exposed simultaneously.



      However, the time difference (in relation to the total exposure time) becomes smaller as the exposure time increases. It might become insignificant depending on your requirements.



      If you cannot tolerate rolling shutter at all, you still have 2 options:



      • use external global shutter

      • use flash (the shutter opens and closes in darkness, flash illuminates the whole scene simultaneously)





      share|improve this answer












      It is still the same shutter, even in long exposure and pixels are not exposed simultaneously.



      However, the time difference (in relation to the total exposure time) becomes smaller as the exposure time increases. It might become insignificant depending on your requirements.



      If you cannot tolerate rolling shutter at all, you still have 2 options:



      • use external global shutter

      • use flash (the shutter opens and closes in darkness, flash illuminates the whole scene simultaneously)






      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 2 days ago









      szulat

      3,42011025




      3,42011025











      • I am looking at trying the 2nd option. Hope rolling shutter would not create any issues
        – karthikeyan
        2 days ago










      • Would rolling shutter even be a problem with long exposure? I mean, what does 1/16000 second matter when the shutter is open a total 2 or 3 seconds, or 10 seconds?
        – user69960
        2 days ago






      • 1




        realistic shutter travel time is probably closer to 1/500 sec but yes, i doubt it really makes a difference for long exposures where most of the exposure is captured simultaneously for all pixels.
        – szulat
        2 days ago
















      • I am looking at trying the 2nd option. Hope rolling shutter would not create any issues
        – karthikeyan
        2 days ago










      • Would rolling shutter even be a problem with long exposure? I mean, what does 1/16000 second matter when the shutter is open a total 2 or 3 seconds, or 10 seconds?
        – user69960
        2 days ago






      • 1




        realistic shutter travel time is probably closer to 1/500 sec but yes, i doubt it really makes a difference for long exposures where most of the exposure is captured simultaneously for all pixels.
        – szulat
        2 days ago















      I am looking at trying the 2nd option. Hope rolling shutter would not create any issues
      – karthikeyan
      2 days ago




      I am looking at trying the 2nd option. Hope rolling shutter would not create any issues
      – karthikeyan
      2 days ago












      Would rolling shutter even be a problem with long exposure? I mean, what does 1/16000 second matter when the shutter is open a total 2 or 3 seconds, or 10 seconds?
      – user69960
      2 days ago




      Would rolling shutter even be a problem with long exposure? I mean, what does 1/16000 second matter when the shutter is open a total 2 or 3 seconds, or 10 seconds?
      – user69960
      2 days ago




      1




      1




      realistic shutter travel time is probably closer to 1/500 sec but yes, i doubt it really makes a difference for long exposures where most of the exposure is captured simultaneously for all pixels.
      – szulat
      2 days ago




      realistic shutter travel time is probably closer to 1/500 sec but yes, i doubt it really makes a difference for long exposures where most of the exposure is captured simultaneously for all pixels.
      – szulat
      2 days ago










      up vote
      2
      down vote













      CMOS pixels are reset and then gather the cumulative charge from the light they receive until they are read & reset again. The CMOS is usually reset, the shutter process takes place (front curtain, delay, then rear curtain) and then values are read.



      Because of the mechanical process, there will always be a short period during the shutter opening/closing events where the sensor is partially obscured.



      If this affects you will depend on what type of event you are attempting to capture with a long exposure. If you're hoping to capture a bright but unpredictable event like lightning then it's possible that a shutter curtain could be half-closed during the event. If you're looking for something under more constant lighting conditions then the 1/125 or 1/250th sec that are needed would be inconsequential in an exposure of 1 sec or more.






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        2
        down vote













        CMOS pixels are reset and then gather the cumulative charge from the light they receive until they are read & reset again. The CMOS is usually reset, the shutter process takes place (front curtain, delay, then rear curtain) and then values are read.



        Because of the mechanical process, there will always be a short period during the shutter opening/closing events where the sensor is partially obscured.



        If this affects you will depend on what type of event you are attempting to capture with a long exposure. If you're hoping to capture a bright but unpredictable event like lightning then it's possible that a shutter curtain could be half-closed during the event. If you're looking for something under more constant lighting conditions then the 1/125 or 1/250th sec that are needed would be inconsequential in an exposure of 1 sec or more.






        share|improve this answer






















          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          CMOS pixels are reset and then gather the cumulative charge from the light they receive until they are read & reset again. The CMOS is usually reset, the shutter process takes place (front curtain, delay, then rear curtain) and then values are read.



          Because of the mechanical process, there will always be a short period during the shutter opening/closing events where the sensor is partially obscured.



          If this affects you will depend on what type of event you are attempting to capture with a long exposure. If you're hoping to capture a bright but unpredictable event like lightning then it's possible that a shutter curtain could be half-closed during the event. If you're looking for something under more constant lighting conditions then the 1/125 or 1/250th sec that are needed would be inconsequential in an exposure of 1 sec or more.






          share|improve this answer












          CMOS pixels are reset and then gather the cumulative charge from the light they receive until they are read & reset again. The CMOS is usually reset, the shutter process takes place (front curtain, delay, then rear curtain) and then values are read.



          Because of the mechanical process, there will always be a short period during the shutter opening/closing events where the sensor is partially obscured.



          If this affects you will depend on what type of event you are attempting to capture with a long exposure. If you're hoping to capture a bright but unpredictable event like lightning then it's possible that a shutter curtain could be half-closed during the event. If you're looking for something under more constant lighting conditions then the 1/125 or 1/250th sec that are needed would be inconsequential in an exposure of 1 sec or more.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          James Snell

          9,0481837




          9,0481837




















              up vote
              2
              down vote













              For the purpose you describe: Yes, all pixels are exposed simultaneously; they work independently, in parallel. Even for the short periods of time at start and finish, they're still all working together - but the shutter will need some time to get out of the way completely.



              So if a short event were to happen during the long exposure, what you will get is a simultaneous read across the surface of the sensor.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Andy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                up vote
                2
                down vote













                For the purpose you describe: Yes, all pixels are exposed simultaneously; they work independently, in parallel. Even for the short periods of time at start and finish, they're still all working together - but the shutter will need some time to get out of the way completely.



                So if a short event were to happen during the long exposure, what you will get is a simultaneous read across the surface of the sensor.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Andy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.



















                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote









                  For the purpose you describe: Yes, all pixels are exposed simultaneously; they work independently, in parallel. Even for the short periods of time at start and finish, they're still all working together - but the shutter will need some time to get out of the way completely.



                  So if a short event were to happen during the long exposure, what you will get is a simultaneous read across the surface of the sensor.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Andy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  For the purpose you describe: Yes, all pixels are exposed simultaneously; they work independently, in parallel. Even for the short periods of time at start and finish, they're still all working together - but the shutter will need some time to get out of the way completely.



                  So if a short event were to happen during the long exposure, what you will get is a simultaneous read across the surface of the sensor.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Andy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  Andy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 2 days ago









                  Andy

                  1211




                  1211




                  New contributor




                  Andy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  Andy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  Andy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.



























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f101345%2fdoes-a-long-exposure-in-dslr-camera-have-a-similar-effect-to-a-global-shutter%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Comments

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What does second last employer means? [closed]

                      Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

                      One-line joke