How is possible that those shapes are equivalent in topology?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
24
down vote

favorite
4












I recently started to study topology, I have no idea about the subject so my question could be very simple but I need a clear explanation. It is about the page number 19 of Introducton to Topology by Colin Adams and Robert Franzosa; it said that the shapes:



donut



sphere with two holes



are equivalent in topology, but one has just one hole and the other has two. is possible to add holes or stick holes?







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    Each of the two holes in the sphere has two circular edges. But the first picture also has two circular edges.
    – Michael Hardy
    Aug 26 at 1:27






  • 4




    It is important to realize that these examples are NOT two dimensional surfaces, they are three dimensional solids. Imagine the first solid to be a deflated rubber bag which is then "blown up" to the round second solid.
    – user247327
    Aug 26 at 3:31






  • 1




    The drawing is perhaps not the best but hopefully the others explained it.
    – Tom
    Aug 27 at 9:50














up vote
24
down vote

favorite
4












I recently started to study topology, I have no idea about the subject so my question could be very simple but I need a clear explanation. It is about the page number 19 of Introducton to Topology by Colin Adams and Robert Franzosa; it said that the shapes:



donut



sphere with two holes



are equivalent in topology, but one has just one hole and the other has two. is possible to add holes or stick holes?







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    Each of the two holes in the sphere has two circular edges. But the first picture also has two circular edges.
    – Michael Hardy
    Aug 26 at 1:27






  • 4




    It is important to realize that these examples are NOT two dimensional surfaces, they are three dimensional solids. Imagine the first solid to be a deflated rubber bag which is then "blown up" to the round second solid.
    – user247327
    Aug 26 at 3:31






  • 1




    The drawing is perhaps not the best but hopefully the others explained it.
    – Tom
    Aug 27 at 9:50












up vote
24
down vote

favorite
4









up vote
24
down vote

favorite
4






4





I recently started to study topology, I have no idea about the subject so my question could be very simple but I need a clear explanation. It is about the page number 19 of Introducton to Topology by Colin Adams and Robert Franzosa; it said that the shapes:



donut



sphere with two holes



are equivalent in topology, but one has just one hole and the other has two. is possible to add holes or stick holes?







share|cite|improve this question














I recently started to study topology, I have no idea about the subject so my question could be very simple but I need a clear explanation. It is about the page number 19 of Introducton to Topology by Colin Adams and Robert Franzosa; it said that the shapes:



donut



sphere with two holes



are equivalent in topology, but one has just one hole and the other has two. is possible to add holes or stick holes?









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 25 at 19:05









Micah

28.5k1361101




28.5k1361101










asked Aug 25 at 19:00









José Marín

12916




12916







  • 1




    Each of the two holes in the sphere has two circular edges. But the first picture also has two circular edges.
    – Michael Hardy
    Aug 26 at 1:27






  • 4




    It is important to realize that these examples are NOT two dimensional surfaces, they are three dimensional solids. Imagine the first solid to be a deflated rubber bag which is then "blown up" to the round second solid.
    – user247327
    Aug 26 at 3:31






  • 1




    The drawing is perhaps not the best but hopefully the others explained it.
    – Tom
    Aug 27 at 9:50












  • 1




    Each of the two holes in the sphere has two circular edges. But the first picture also has two circular edges.
    – Michael Hardy
    Aug 26 at 1:27






  • 4




    It is important to realize that these examples are NOT two dimensional surfaces, they are three dimensional solids. Imagine the first solid to be a deflated rubber bag which is then "blown up" to the round second solid.
    – user247327
    Aug 26 at 3:31






  • 1




    The drawing is perhaps not the best but hopefully the others explained it.
    – Tom
    Aug 27 at 9:50







1




1




Each of the two holes in the sphere has two circular edges. But the first picture also has two circular edges.
– Michael Hardy
Aug 26 at 1:27




Each of the two holes in the sphere has two circular edges. But the first picture also has two circular edges.
– Michael Hardy
Aug 26 at 1:27




4




4




It is important to realize that these examples are NOT two dimensional surfaces, they are three dimensional solids. Imagine the first solid to be a deflated rubber bag which is then "blown up" to the round second solid.
– user247327
Aug 26 at 3:31




It is important to realize that these examples are NOT two dimensional surfaces, they are three dimensional solids. Imagine the first solid to be a deflated rubber bag which is then "blown up" to the round second solid.
– user247327
Aug 26 at 3:31




1




1




The drawing is perhaps not the best but hopefully the others explained it.
– Tom
Aug 27 at 9:50




The drawing is perhaps not the best but hopefully the others explained it.
– Tom
Aug 27 at 9:50










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
54
down vote



accepted










Look a bit more closely at the second picture. There's a couple of little dotted lines connecting the two holes that may be a bit hard to see.



(left pic is from post, right pic is super contrast enhanced to tease out line)



That is meant to convey the impression they are the two ends of a single, long, curved hole through the interior.






share|cite|improve this answer
















  • 28




    I see the trench, but which one is the superlaser and which one is the exhaust port?
    – Lamar Latrell
    Aug 26 at 4:39

















up vote
40
down vote













The "two holes" in that sphere are two ends of the same hole. (That is, if you drilled one hole all the way through a sphere, you would end up with something that looked very much like your picture.)






share|cite|improve this answer
















  • 3




    Or you inflated the flattened donut, which happens to have a weak, more redundant part.
    – MathAsFun
    Aug 25 at 19:07






  • 4




    It’s probably worth noting that in topology a “hole” is not a hole unless it creates an opening that passes entirely through the shape. What we might call a hole... in a wall for instance, after drilling a hole for a screw or something... is not actually a hole in topology.
    – Fogmeister
    Aug 26 at 6:47

















up vote
20
down vote













You may also notice the tunel, which I agree with you it is not clear in this photo.






share|cite|improve this answer
















  • 7




    I think this answer captures the real problem, namely that, in the second picture, the tube inside the sphere, which connects the two holes, is represented by a pair of dashed lines that are so faint as to be almost invisible.
    – Andreas Blass
    Aug 25 at 20:28











  • @AndreasBlass, thanks for the comment, that way I managed to receive the "nice answer" badge. +1 from me too.
    – dmtri
    Aug 26 at 6:10

















up vote
6
down vote













enter image description here
The cuboid and the sphere are topological euvivalent. Drill a hole through each body as indicated by the arrow. The resulting bodies are still topological equivalent.






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2894411%2fhow-is-possible-that-those-shapes-are-equivalent-in-topology%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    54
    down vote



    accepted










    Look a bit more closely at the second picture. There's a couple of little dotted lines connecting the two holes that may be a bit hard to see.



    (left pic is from post, right pic is super contrast enhanced to tease out line)



    That is meant to convey the impression they are the two ends of a single, long, curved hole through the interior.






    share|cite|improve this answer
















    • 28




      I see the trench, but which one is the superlaser and which one is the exhaust port?
      – Lamar Latrell
      Aug 26 at 4:39














    up vote
    54
    down vote



    accepted










    Look a bit more closely at the second picture. There's a couple of little dotted lines connecting the two holes that may be a bit hard to see.



    (left pic is from post, right pic is super contrast enhanced to tease out line)



    That is meant to convey the impression they are the two ends of a single, long, curved hole through the interior.






    share|cite|improve this answer
















    • 28




      I see the trench, but which one is the superlaser and which one is the exhaust port?
      – Lamar Latrell
      Aug 26 at 4:39












    up vote
    54
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    54
    down vote



    accepted






    Look a bit more closely at the second picture. There's a couple of little dotted lines connecting the two holes that may be a bit hard to see.



    (left pic is from post, right pic is super contrast enhanced to tease out line)



    That is meant to convey the impression they are the two ends of a single, long, curved hole through the interior.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    Look a bit more closely at the second picture. There's a couple of little dotted lines connecting the two holes that may be a bit hard to see.



    (left pic is from post, right pic is super contrast enhanced to tease out line)



    That is meant to convey the impression they are the two ends of a single, long, curved hole through the interior.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Aug 26 at 0:34









    The_Sympathizer

    6,5522241




    6,5522241







    • 28




      I see the trench, but which one is the superlaser and which one is the exhaust port?
      – Lamar Latrell
      Aug 26 at 4:39












    • 28




      I see the trench, but which one is the superlaser and which one is the exhaust port?
      – Lamar Latrell
      Aug 26 at 4:39







    28




    28




    I see the trench, but which one is the superlaser and which one is the exhaust port?
    – Lamar Latrell
    Aug 26 at 4:39




    I see the trench, but which one is the superlaser and which one is the exhaust port?
    – Lamar Latrell
    Aug 26 at 4:39










    up vote
    40
    down vote













    The "two holes" in that sphere are two ends of the same hole. (That is, if you drilled one hole all the way through a sphere, you would end up with something that looked very much like your picture.)






    share|cite|improve this answer
















    • 3




      Or you inflated the flattened donut, which happens to have a weak, more redundant part.
      – MathAsFun
      Aug 25 at 19:07






    • 4




      It’s probably worth noting that in topology a “hole” is not a hole unless it creates an opening that passes entirely through the shape. What we might call a hole... in a wall for instance, after drilling a hole for a screw or something... is not actually a hole in topology.
      – Fogmeister
      Aug 26 at 6:47














    up vote
    40
    down vote













    The "two holes" in that sphere are two ends of the same hole. (That is, if you drilled one hole all the way through a sphere, you would end up with something that looked very much like your picture.)






    share|cite|improve this answer
















    • 3




      Or you inflated the flattened donut, which happens to have a weak, more redundant part.
      – MathAsFun
      Aug 25 at 19:07






    • 4




      It’s probably worth noting that in topology a “hole” is not a hole unless it creates an opening that passes entirely through the shape. What we might call a hole... in a wall for instance, after drilling a hole for a screw or something... is not actually a hole in topology.
      – Fogmeister
      Aug 26 at 6:47












    up vote
    40
    down vote










    up vote
    40
    down vote









    The "two holes" in that sphere are two ends of the same hole. (That is, if you drilled one hole all the way through a sphere, you would end up with something that looked very much like your picture.)






    share|cite|improve this answer












    The "two holes" in that sphere are two ends of the same hole. (That is, if you drilled one hole all the way through a sphere, you would end up with something that looked very much like your picture.)







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Aug 25 at 19:04









    Micah

    28.5k1361101




    28.5k1361101







    • 3




      Or you inflated the flattened donut, which happens to have a weak, more redundant part.
      – MathAsFun
      Aug 25 at 19:07






    • 4




      It’s probably worth noting that in topology a “hole” is not a hole unless it creates an opening that passes entirely through the shape. What we might call a hole... in a wall for instance, after drilling a hole for a screw or something... is not actually a hole in topology.
      – Fogmeister
      Aug 26 at 6:47












    • 3




      Or you inflated the flattened donut, which happens to have a weak, more redundant part.
      – MathAsFun
      Aug 25 at 19:07






    • 4




      It’s probably worth noting that in topology a “hole” is not a hole unless it creates an opening that passes entirely through the shape. What we might call a hole... in a wall for instance, after drilling a hole for a screw or something... is not actually a hole in topology.
      – Fogmeister
      Aug 26 at 6:47







    3




    3




    Or you inflated the flattened donut, which happens to have a weak, more redundant part.
    – MathAsFun
    Aug 25 at 19:07




    Or you inflated the flattened donut, which happens to have a weak, more redundant part.
    – MathAsFun
    Aug 25 at 19:07




    4




    4




    It’s probably worth noting that in topology a “hole” is not a hole unless it creates an opening that passes entirely through the shape. What we might call a hole... in a wall for instance, after drilling a hole for a screw or something... is not actually a hole in topology.
    – Fogmeister
    Aug 26 at 6:47




    It’s probably worth noting that in topology a “hole” is not a hole unless it creates an opening that passes entirely through the shape. What we might call a hole... in a wall for instance, after drilling a hole for a screw or something... is not actually a hole in topology.
    – Fogmeister
    Aug 26 at 6:47










    up vote
    20
    down vote













    You may also notice the tunel, which I agree with you it is not clear in this photo.






    share|cite|improve this answer
















    • 7




      I think this answer captures the real problem, namely that, in the second picture, the tube inside the sphere, which connects the two holes, is represented by a pair of dashed lines that are so faint as to be almost invisible.
      – Andreas Blass
      Aug 25 at 20:28











    • @AndreasBlass, thanks for the comment, that way I managed to receive the "nice answer" badge. +1 from me too.
      – dmtri
      Aug 26 at 6:10














    up vote
    20
    down vote













    You may also notice the tunel, which I agree with you it is not clear in this photo.






    share|cite|improve this answer
















    • 7




      I think this answer captures the real problem, namely that, in the second picture, the tube inside the sphere, which connects the two holes, is represented by a pair of dashed lines that are so faint as to be almost invisible.
      – Andreas Blass
      Aug 25 at 20:28











    • @AndreasBlass, thanks for the comment, that way I managed to receive the "nice answer" badge. +1 from me too.
      – dmtri
      Aug 26 at 6:10












    up vote
    20
    down vote










    up vote
    20
    down vote









    You may also notice the tunel, which I agree with you it is not clear in this photo.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    You may also notice the tunel, which I agree with you it is not clear in this photo.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Aug 25 at 19:10









    dmtri

    774317




    774317







    • 7




      I think this answer captures the real problem, namely that, in the second picture, the tube inside the sphere, which connects the two holes, is represented by a pair of dashed lines that are so faint as to be almost invisible.
      – Andreas Blass
      Aug 25 at 20:28











    • @AndreasBlass, thanks for the comment, that way I managed to receive the "nice answer" badge. +1 from me too.
      – dmtri
      Aug 26 at 6:10












    • 7




      I think this answer captures the real problem, namely that, in the second picture, the tube inside the sphere, which connects the two holes, is represented by a pair of dashed lines that are so faint as to be almost invisible.
      – Andreas Blass
      Aug 25 at 20:28











    • @AndreasBlass, thanks for the comment, that way I managed to receive the "nice answer" badge. +1 from me too.
      – dmtri
      Aug 26 at 6:10







    7




    7




    I think this answer captures the real problem, namely that, in the second picture, the tube inside the sphere, which connects the two holes, is represented by a pair of dashed lines that are so faint as to be almost invisible.
    – Andreas Blass
    Aug 25 at 20:28





    I think this answer captures the real problem, namely that, in the second picture, the tube inside the sphere, which connects the two holes, is represented by a pair of dashed lines that are so faint as to be almost invisible.
    – Andreas Blass
    Aug 25 at 20:28













    @AndreasBlass, thanks for the comment, that way I managed to receive the "nice answer" badge. +1 from me too.
    – dmtri
    Aug 26 at 6:10




    @AndreasBlass, thanks for the comment, that way I managed to receive the "nice answer" badge. +1 from me too.
    – dmtri
    Aug 26 at 6:10










    up vote
    6
    down vote













    enter image description here
    The cuboid and the sphere are topological euvivalent. Drill a hole through each body as indicated by the arrow. The resulting bodies are still topological equivalent.






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      6
      down vote













      enter image description here
      The cuboid and the sphere are topological euvivalent. Drill a hole through each body as indicated by the arrow. The resulting bodies are still topological equivalent.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        6
        down vote










        up vote
        6
        down vote









        enter image description here
        The cuboid and the sphere are topological euvivalent. Drill a hole through each body as indicated by the arrow. The resulting bodies are still topological equivalent.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        enter image description here
        The cuboid and the sphere are topological euvivalent. Drill a hole through each body as indicated by the arrow. The resulting bodies are still topological equivalent.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 25 at 20:06









        miracle173

        7,17922247




        7,17922247



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2894411%2fhow-is-possible-that-those-shapes-are-equivalent-in-topology%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

            Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

            Confectionery