asymptotic for li(x)-Ri(x)

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1












Is it true that $$operatornameli(x)-operatornameRi(x) sim frac12operatornameli(x^1/2) (x to infty),$$
where
$$operatornameRi(x) = sum_n = 1^infty fracmu(n)n operatornameli(x^1/n) = 1 + sum_k = 1^infty frac(log x)^kk cdot k! zeta(k+1)$$
for all $x > 0$? If so, how can one prove the given asymptotic?



Note that
beginalignlabellirieq
lim_x to infty fracoperatornameli(x) - operatornameRi(x)frac12operatornameli(x^1/2) = 1- 2lim_x to infty sum_n = 3^infty fracmu(n)nfracoperatornameli(x^1/n)operatornameli(x^1/2) = 1-2sum_n = 3^infty lim_x to infty fracmu(n)nfracoperatornameli(x^1/n)operatornameli(x^1/2) = 1,
endalign
provided that the given limit can be interchanged with the given sum. However, I am unable to justify interchanging the limit with the sum.







share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    6
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Is it true that $$operatornameli(x)-operatornameRi(x) sim frac12operatornameli(x^1/2) (x to infty),$$
    where
    $$operatornameRi(x) = sum_n = 1^infty fracmu(n)n operatornameli(x^1/n) = 1 + sum_k = 1^infty frac(log x)^kk cdot k! zeta(k+1)$$
    for all $x > 0$? If so, how can one prove the given asymptotic?



    Note that
    beginalignlabellirieq
    lim_x to infty fracoperatornameli(x) - operatornameRi(x)frac12operatornameli(x^1/2) = 1- 2lim_x to infty sum_n = 3^infty fracmu(n)nfracoperatornameli(x^1/n)operatornameli(x^1/2) = 1-2sum_n = 3^infty lim_x to infty fracmu(n)nfracoperatornameli(x^1/n)operatornameli(x^1/2) = 1,
    endalign
    provided that the given limit can be interchanged with the given sum. However, I am unable to justify interchanging the limit with the sum.







    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Is it true that $$operatornameli(x)-operatornameRi(x) sim frac12operatornameli(x^1/2) (x to infty),$$
      where
      $$operatornameRi(x) = sum_n = 1^infty fracmu(n)n operatornameli(x^1/n) = 1 + sum_k = 1^infty frac(log x)^kk cdot k! zeta(k+1)$$
      for all $x > 0$? If so, how can one prove the given asymptotic?



      Note that
      beginalignlabellirieq
      lim_x to infty fracoperatornameli(x) - operatornameRi(x)frac12operatornameli(x^1/2) = 1- 2lim_x to infty sum_n = 3^infty fracmu(n)nfracoperatornameli(x^1/n)operatornameli(x^1/2) = 1-2sum_n = 3^infty lim_x to infty fracmu(n)nfracoperatornameli(x^1/n)operatornameli(x^1/2) = 1,
      endalign
      provided that the given limit can be interchanged with the given sum. However, I am unable to justify interchanging the limit with the sum.







      share|cite|improve this question














      Is it true that $$operatornameli(x)-operatornameRi(x) sim frac12operatornameli(x^1/2) (x to infty),$$
      where
      $$operatornameRi(x) = sum_n = 1^infty fracmu(n)n operatornameli(x^1/n) = 1 + sum_k = 1^infty frac(log x)^kk cdot k! zeta(k+1)$$
      for all $x > 0$? If so, how can one prove the given asymptotic?



      Note that
      beginalignlabellirieq
      lim_x to infty fracoperatornameli(x) - operatornameRi(x)frac12operatornameli(x^1/2) = 1- 2lim_x to infty sum_n = 3^infty fracmu(n)nfracoperatornameli(x^1/n)operatornameli(x^1/2) = 1-2sum_n = 3^infty lim_x to infty fracmu(n)nfracoperatornameli(x^1/n)operatornameli(x^1/2) = 1,
      endalign
      provided that the given limit can be interchanged with the given sum. However, I am unable to justify interchanging the limit with the sum.









      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 19 at 5:35









      GH from MO

      56k5136213




      56k5136213










      asked Aug 18 at 23:24









      Jesse Elliott

      1,309818




      1,309818




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted










          Yes, the stated asymptotics (and much more) is true. The idea is to truncate $operatornameRi(x)$ appropriately.



          Let us use the series representation (see here)
          $$operatornameli(t)=gamma+loglog t+sum_k=1^inftyfrac(log t)^kkcdot k!,qquad t>1.$$
          This implies
          $$operatornameli(t)=gamma+loglog t+O(log t),qquad 1<t<e,$$
          hence also
          $$operatornameli(x^1/n)=gamma+loglog x-log n+Oleft(fraclog xnright),qquad n>log x.$$
          As a result, for $x>3$ we get
          beginalign*sum_n>log x fracmu(n)n operatornameli(x^1/n)&=O(1)+sum_n>log xfracmu(n)nleft(gamma+loglog x-log nright)\[6pt]
          &=Oleft((loglog x)^2right)+sum_n=1^inftyfracmu(n)nleft(gamma+loglog x-log nright)\[6pt]
          &=Oleft((loglog x)^2right).endalign*
          Here we used that
          $$sum_n=1^inftyfracmu(n)n=0qquadtextandqquadsum_n=1^inftyfracmu(n)log nn=-1$$
          by the prime number theorem. To summarize so far,
          $$operatornameRi(x)=sum_nleqlog x fracmu(n)n operatornameli(x^1/n)+Oleft((loglog x)^2right),qquad x>3.$$
          The error term on the right hand side can probably be improved, but this is not important. In the sum, we detach the first three terms (corresponding to $n=1,2,3$) and estimate the rest trivially. We get
          $$operatornameRi(x)=operatornameli(x)-frac12operatornameli(x^1/2)+Oleft(fracx^1/3log xright),qquad x>3.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer


















          • 1




            Thanks! Your proof yields the stronger fact that the defining series expansion for $operatornameRi(x)$ is also an asymptotic expansion for $operatornameRi(x)$ at $infty$. I suspected this to be true and am glad that your proof confirms it. Strangely I couldn't find a proof of this anywhere in the literature.
            – Jesse Elliott
            Aug 19 at 21:07











          • Thanks for accepting my answer, I am glad I could help!
            – GH from MO
            Aug 19 at 21:59










          • I'd like to provide this proof in a paper of mine. For now I've cited "GH from MO" and this link. If there is an alternative way you'd like me to cite this you can email me at Jesse.elliott@csuci.edu.
            – Jesse Elliott
            Aug 21 at 23:39










          • @JesseElliott: I sent you an email.
            – GH from MO
            Aug 22 at 12:42

















          up vote
          5
          down vote













          Since we have
          $$rm Ri(x)=1+sum_kge 1frac(log x)^kkcdot k!zeta(k+1),$$
          which is convergence absolutely for all $x>0$. Therefore we can use the L'Hospital's rule, and by
          $$sum_nge 1fracmu(n)n=0$$
          we have

          beginalign
          lim_xrightarrow +inftyfracrm li(x)-rm Ri(x)frac12rm li(x^1/2)&=lim_xrightarrow +inftyfracfrac1log x-frac1xlog xsum_kge 1frac(log x)^kk!zeta(k+1)frac12frac1log(x^1/2)cdotfrac12x^-1/2\
          &=lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(2sqrtxleft(1-frac1xsum_kge 1frac(log x)^kk!sum_nge 1fracmu(n)n^k+1right)right)\
          &=lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(2sqrtxleft(1-frac1xsum_nge 1fracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)right)right)\
          &=1-2lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(frac1sqrtxsum_nge 3fracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)right).
          endalign
          On the other hand, for $x$ sufficiently large,
          $$sum_3le nle xfracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)ll x^1/3log x$$
          and
          $$sum_n>xfracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)ll sum_n>xfrac1nleft(expleft(fraclog xnright)-1right)ll sum_n>xfraclog xn^2ll 1.$$
          Hence we get
          $$lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(frac1sqrtxsum_nge 3fracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)right)=0.$$
          Which completes the proof.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "504"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f308631%2fasymptotic-for-lix-rix%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            6
            down vote



            accepted










            Yes, the stated asymptotics (and much more) is true. The idea is to truncate $operatornameRi(x)$ appropriately.



            Let us use the series representation (see here)
            $$operatornameli(t)=gamma+loglog t+sum_k=1^inftyfrac(log t)^kkcdot k!,qquad t>1.$$
            This implies
            $$operatornameli(t)=gamma+loglog t+O(log t),qquad 1<t<e,$$
            hence also
            $$operatornameli(x^1/n)=gamma+loglog x-log n+Oleft(fraclog xnright),qquad n>log x.$$
            As a result, for $x>3$ we get
            beginalign*sum_n>log x fracmu(n)n operatornameli(x^1/n)&=O(1)+sum_n>log xfracmu(n)nleft(gamma+loglog x-log nright)\[6pt]
            &=Oleft((loglog x)^2right)+sum_n=1^inftyfracmu(n)nleft(gamma+loglog x-log nright)\[6pt]
            &=Oleft((loglog x)^2right).endalign*
            Here we used that
            $$sum_n=1^inftyfracmu(n)n=0qquadtextandqquadsum_n=1^inftyfracmu(n)log nn=-1$$
            by the prime number theorem. To summarize so far,
            $$operatornameRi(x)=sum_nleqlog x fracmu(n)n operatornameli(x^1/n)+Oleft((loglog x)^2right),qquad x>3.$$
            The error term on the right hand side can probably be improved, but this is not important. In the sum, we detach the first three terms (corresponding to $n=1,2,3$) and estimate the rest trivially. We get
            $$operatornameRi(x)=operatornameli(x)-frac12operatornameli(x^1/2)+Oleft(fracx^1/3log xright),qquad x>3.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer


















            • 1




              Thanks! Your proof yields the stronger fact that the defining series expansion for $operatornameRi(x)$ is also an asymptotic expansion for $operatornameRi(x)$ at $infty$. I suspected this to be true and am glad that your proof confirms it. Strangely I couldn't find a proof of this anywhere in the literature.
              – Jesse Elliott
              Aug 19 at 21:07











            • Thanks for accepting my answer, I am glad I could help!
              – GH from MO
              Aug 19 at 21:59










            • I'd like to provide this proof in a paper of mine. For now I've cited "GH from MO" and this link. If there is an alternative way you'd like me to cite this you can email me at Jesse.elliott@csuci.edu.
              – Jesse Elliott
              Aug 21 at 23:39










            • @JesseElliott: I sent you an email.
              – GH from MO
              Aug 22 at 12:42














            up vote
            6
            down vote



            accepted










            Yes, the stated asymptotics (and much more) is true. The idea is to truncate $operatornameRi(x)$ appropriately.



            Let us use the series representation (see here)
            $$operatornameli(t)=gamma+loglog t+sum_k=1^inftyfrac(log t)^kkcdot k!,qquad t>1.$$
            This implies
            $$operatornameli(t)=gamma+loglog t+O(log t),qquad 1<t<e,$$
            hence also
            $$operatornameli(x^1/n)=gamma+loglog x-log n+Oleft(fraclog xnright),qquad n>log x.$$
            As a result, for $x>3$ we get
            beginalign*sum_n>log x fracmu(n)n operatornameli(x^1/n)&=O(1)+sum_n>log xfracmu(n)nleft(gamma+loglog x-log nright)\[6pt]
            &=Oleft((loglog x)^2right)+sum_n=1^inftyfracmu(n)nleft(gamma+loglog x-log nright)\[6pt]
            &=Oleft((loglog x)^2right).endalign*
            Here we used that
            $$sum_n=1^inftyfracmu(n)n=0qquadtextandqquadsum_n=1^inftyfracmu(n)log nn=-1$$
            by the prime number theorem. To summarize so far,
            $$operatornameRi(x)=sum_nleqlog x fracmu(n)n operatornameli(x^1/n)+Oleft((loglog x)^2right),qquad x>3.$$
            The error term on the right hand side can probably be improved, but this is not important. In the sum, we detach the first three terms (corresponding to $n=1,2,3$) and estimate the rest trivially. We get
            $$operatornameRi(x)=operatornameli(x)-frac12operatornameli(x^1/2)+Oleft(fracx^1/3log xright),qquad x>3.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer


















            • 1




              Thanks! Your proof yields the stronger fact that the defining series expansion for $operatornameRi(x)$ is also an asymptotic expansion for $operatornameRi(x)$ at $infty$. I suspected this to be true and am glad that your proof confirms it. Strangely I couldn't find a proof of this anywhere in the literature.
              – Jesse Elliott
              Aug 19 at 21:07











            • Thanks for accepting my answer, I am glad I could help!
              – GH from MO
              Aug 19 at 21:59










            • I'd like to provide this proof in a paper of mine. For now I've cited "GH from MO" and this link. If there is an alternative way you'd like me to cite this you can email me at Jesse.elliott@csuci.edu.
              – Jesse Elliott
              Aug 21 at 23:39










            • @JesseElliott: I sent you an email.
              – GH from MO
              Aug 22 at 12:42












            up vote
            6
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            6
            down vote



            accepted






            Yes, the stated asymptotics (and much more) is true. The idea is to truncate $operatornameRi(x)$ appropriately.



            Let us use the series representation (see here)
            $$operatornameli(t)=gamma+loglog t+sum_k=1^inftyfrac(log t)^kkcdot k!,qquad t>1.$$
            This implies
            $$operatornameli(t)=gamma+loglog t+O(log t),qquad 1<t<e,$$
            hence also
            $$operatornameli(x^1/n)=gamma+loglog x-log n+Oleft(fraclog xnright),qquad n>log x.$$
            As a result, for $x>3$ we get
            beginalign*sum_n>log x fracmu(n)n operatornameli(x^1/n)&=O(1)+sum_n>log xfracmu(n)nleft(gamma+loglog x-log nright)\[6pt]
            &=Oleft((loglog x)^2right)+sum_n=1^inftyfracmu(n)nleft(gamma+loglog x-log nright)\[6pt]
            &=Oleft((loglog x)^2right).endalign*
            Here we used that
            $$sum_n=1^inftyfracmu(n)n=0qquadtextandqquadsum_n=1^inftyfracmu(n)log nn=-1$$
            by the prime number theorem. To summarize so far,
            $$operatornameRi(x)=sum_nleqlog x fracmu(n)n operatornameli(x^1/n)+Oleft((loglog x)^2right),qquad x>3.$$
            The error term on the right hand side can probably be improved, but this is not important. In the sum, we detach the first three terms (corresponding to $n=1,2,3$) and estimate the rest trivially. We get
            $$operatornameRi(x)=operatornameli(x)-frac12operatornameli(x^1/2)+Oleft(fracx^1/3log xright),qquad x>3.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer














            Yes, the stated asymptotics (and much more) is true. The idea is to truncate $operatornameRi(x)$ appropriately.



            Let us use the series representation (see here)
            $$operatornameli(t)=gamma+loglog t+sum_k=1^inftyfrac(log t)^kkcdot k!,qquad t>1.$$
            This implies
            $$operatornameli(t)=gamma+loglog t+O(log t),qquad 1<t<e,$$
            hence also
            $$operatornameli(x^1/n)=gamma+loglog x-log n+Oleft(fraclog xnright),qquad n>log x.$$
            As a result, for $x>3$ we get
            beginalign*sum_n>log x fracmu(n)n operatornameli(x^1/n)&=O(1)+sum_n>log xfracmu(n)nleft(gamma+loglog x-log nright)\[6pt]
            &=Oleft((loglog x)^2right)+sum_n=1^inftyfracmu(n)nleft(gamma+loglog x-log nright)\[6pt]
            &=Oleft((loglog x)^2right).endalign*
            Here we used that
            $$sum_n=1^inftyfracmu(n)n=0qquadtextandqquadsum_n=1^inftyfracmu(n)log nn=-1$$
            by the prime number theorem. To summarize so far,
            $$operatornameRi(x)=sum_nleqlog x fracmu(n)n operatornameli(x^1/n)+Oleft((loglog x)^2right),qquad x>3.$$
            The error term on the right hand side can probably be improved, but this is not important. In the sum, we detach the first three terms (corresponding to $n=1,2,3$) and estimate the rest trivially. We get
            $$operatornameRi(x)=operatornameli(x)-frac12operatornameli(x^1/2)+Oleft(fracx^1/3log xright),qquad x>3.$$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Aug 19 at 7:20

























            answered Aug 19 at 5:21









            GH from MO

            56k5136213




            56k5136213







            • 1




              Thanks! Your proof yields the stronger fact that the defining series expansion for $operatornameRi(x)$ is also an asymptotic expansion for $operatornameRi(x)$ at $infty$. I suspected this to be true and am glad that your proof confirms it. Strangely I couldn't find a proof of this anywhere in the literature.
              – Jesse Elliott
              Aug 19 at 21:07











            • Thanks for accepting my answer, I am glad I could help!
              – GH from MO
              Aug 19 at 21:59










            • I'd like to provide this proof in a paper of mine. For now I've cited "GH from MO" and this link. If there is an alternative way you'd like me to cite this you can email me at Jesse.elliott@csuci.edu.
              – Jesse Elliott
              Aug 21 at 23:39










            • @JesseElliott: I sent you an email.
              – GH from MO
              Aug 22 at 12:42












            • 1




              Thanks! Your proof yields the stronger fact that the defining series expansion for $operatornameRi(x)$ is also an asymptotic expansion for $operatornameRi(x)$ at $infty$. I suspected this to be true and am glad that your proof confirms it. Strangely I couldn't find a proof of this anywhere in the literature.
              – Jesse Elliott
              Aug 19 at 21:07











            • Thanks for accepting my answer, I am glad I could help!
              – GH from MO
              Aug 19 at 21:59










            • I'd like to provide this proof in a paper of mine. For now I've cited "GH from MO" and this link. If there is an alternative way you'd like me to cite this you can email me at Jesse.elliott@csuci.edu.
              – Jesse Elliott
              Aug 21 at 23:39










            • @JesseElliott: I sent you an email.
              – GH from MO
              Aug 22 at 12:42







            1




            1




            Thanks! Your proof yields the stronger fact that the defining series expansion for $operatornameRi(x)$ is also an asymptotic expansion for $operatornameRi(x)$ at $infty$. I suspected this to be true and am glad that your proof confirms it. Strangely I couldn't find a proof of this anywhere in the literature.
            – Jesse Elliott
            Aug 19 at 21:07





            Thanks! Your proof yields the stronger fact that the defining series expansion for $operatornameRi(x)$ is also an asymptotic expansion for $operatornameRi(x)$ at $infty$. I suspected this to be true and am glad that your proof confirms it. Strangely I couldn't find a proof of this anywhere in the literature.
            – Jesse Elliott
            Aug 19 at 21:07













            Thanks for accepting my answer, I am glad I could help!
            – GH from MO
            Aug 19 at 21:59




            Thanks for accepting my answer, I am glad I could help!
            – GH from MO
            Aug 19 at 21:59












            I'd like to provide this proof in a paper of mine. For now I've cited "GH from MO" and this link. If there is an alternative way you'd like me to cite this you can email me at Jesse.elliott@csuci.edu.
            – Jesse Elliott
            Aug 21 at 23:39




            I'd like to provide this proof in a paper of mine. For now I've cited "GH from MO" and this link. If there is an alternative way you'd like me to cite this you can email me at Jesse.elliott@csuci.edu.
            – Jesse Elliott
            Aug 21 at 23:39












            @JesseElliott: I sent you an email.
            – GH from MO
            Aug 22 at 12:42




            @JesseElliott: I sent you an email.
            – GH from MO
            Aug 22 at 12:42










            up vote
            5
            down vote













            Since we have
            $$rm Ri(x)=1+sum_kge 1frac(log x)^kkcdot k!zeta(k+1),$$
            which is convergence absolutely for all $x>0$. Therefore we can use the L'Hospital's rule, and by
            $$sum_nge 1fracmu(n)n=0$$
            we have

            beginalign
            lim_xrightarrow +inftyfracrm li(x)-rm Ri(x)frac12rm li(x^1/2)&=lim_xrightarrow +inftyfracfrac1log x-frac1xlog xsum_kge 1frac(log x)^kk!zeta(k+1)frac12frac1log(x^1/2)cdotfrac12x^-1/2\
            &=lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(2sqrtxleft(1-frac1xsum_kge 1frac(log x)^kk!sum_nge 1fracmu(n)n^k+1right)right)\
            &=lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(2sqrtxleft(1-frac1xsum_nge 1fracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)right)right)\
            &=1-2lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(frac1sqrtxsum_nge 3fracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)right).
            endalign
            On the other hand, for $x$ sufficiently large,
            $$sum_3le nle xfracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)ll x^1/3log x$$
            and
            $$sum_n>xfracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)ll sum_n>xfrac1nleft(expleft(fraclog xnright)-1right)ll sum_n>xfraclog xn^2ll 1.$$
            Hence we get
            $$lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(frac1sqrtxsum_nge 3fracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)right)=0.$$
            Which completes the proof.






            share|cite|improve this answer
























              up vote
              5
              down vote













              Since we have
              $$rm Ri(x)=1+sum_kge 1frac(log x)^kkcdot k!zeta(k+1),$$
              which is convergence absolutely for all $x>0$. Therefore we can use the L'Hospital's rule, and by
              $$sum_nge 1fracmu(n)n=0$$
              we have

              beginalign
              lim_xrightarrow +inftyfracrm li(x)-rm Ri(x)frac12rm li(x^1/2)&=lim_xrightarrow +inftyfracfrac1log x-frac1xlog xsum_kge 1frac(log x)^kk!zeta(k+1)frac12frac1log(x^1/2)cdotfrac12x^-1/2\
              &=lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(2sqrtxleft(1-frac1xsum_kge 1frac(log x)^kk!sum_nge 1fracmu(n)n^k+1right)right)\
              &=lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(2sqrtxleft(1-frac1xsum_nge 1fracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)right)right)\
              &=1-2lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(frac1sqrtxsum_nge 3fracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)right).
              endalign
              On the other hand, for $x$ sufficiently large,
              $$sum_3le nle xfracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)ll x^1/3log x$$
              and
              $$sum_n>xfracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)ll sum_n>xfrac1nleft(expleft(fraclog xnright)-1right)ll sum_n>xfraclog xn^2ll 1.$$
              Hence we get
              $$lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(frac1sqrtxsum_nge 3fracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)right)=0.$$
              Which completes the proof.






              share|cite|improve this answer






















                up vote
                5
                down vote










                up vote
                5
                down vote









                Since we have
                $$rm Ri(x)=1+sum_kge 1frac(log x)^kkcdot k!zeta(k+1),$$
                which is convergence absolutely for all $x>0$. Therefore we can use the L'Hospital's rule, and by
                $$sum_nge 1fracmu(n)n=0$$
                we have

                beginalign
                lim_xrightarrow +inftyfracrm li(x)-rm Ri(x)frac12rm li(x^1/2)&=lim_xrightarrow +inftyfracfrac1log x-frac1xlog xsum_kge 1frac(log x)^kk!zeta(k+1)frac12frac1log(x^1/2)cdotfrac12x^-1/2\
                &=lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(2sqrtxleft(1-frac1xsum_kge 1frac(log x)^kk!sum_nge 1fracmu(n)n^k+1right)right)\
                &=lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(2sqrtxleft(1-frac1xsum_nge 1fracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)right)right)\
                &=1-2lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(frac1sqrtxsum_nge 3fracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)right).
                endalign
                On the other hand, for $x$ sufficiently large,
                $$sum_3le nle xfracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)ll x^1/3log x$$
                and
                $$sum_n>xfracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)ll sum_n>xfrac1nleft(expleft(fraclog xnright)-1right)ll sum_n>xfraclog xn^2ll 1.$$
                Hence we get
                $$lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(frac1sqrtxsum_nge 3fracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)right)=0.$$
                Which completes the proof.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Since we have
                $$rm Ri(x)=1+sum_kge 1frac(log x)^kkcdot k!zeta(k+1),$$
                which is convergence absolutely for all $x>0$. Therefore we can use the L'Hospital's rule, and by
                $$sum_nge 1fracmu(n)n=0$$
                we have

                beginalign
                lim_xrightarrow +inftyfracrm li(x)-rm Ri(x)frac12rm li(x^1/2)&=lim_xrightarrow +inftyfracfrac1log x-frac1xlog xsum_kge 1frac(log x)^kk!zeta(k+1)frac12frac1log(x^1/2)cdotfrac12x^-1/2\
                &=lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(2sqrtxleft(1-frac1xsum_kge 1frac(log x)^kk!sum_nge 1fracmu(n)n^k+1right)right)\
                &=lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(2sqrtxleft(1-frac1xsum_nge 1fracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)right)right)\
                &=1-2lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(frac1sqrtxsum_nge 3fracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)right).
                endalign
                On the other hand, for $x$ sufficiently large,
                $$sum_3le nle xfracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)ll x^1/3log x$$
                and
                $$sum_n>xfracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)ll sum_n>xfrac1nleft(expleft(fraclog xnright)-1right)ll sum_n>xfraclog xn^2ll 1.$$
                Hence we get
                $$lim_xrightarrow +inftyleft(frac1sqrtxsum_nge 3fracmu(n)n(x^1/n-1)right)=0.$$
                Which completes the proof.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Aug 19 at 2:19









                Zhou

                33315




                33315



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f308631%2fasymptotic-for-lix-rix%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What does second last employer means? [closed]

                    Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

                    One-line joke