Redefine S - problem with indices

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
6
down vote

favorite












Why are the subscripts placed under the letters and not in the right bottom corner like usual?



documentclass[a4paper,12pt,twoside]article
usepackage[utf8]inputenc
usepackage[T1]fontenc
usepackage[ngerman,english]babel
usepackagecsquotes
usepackageamssymb
usepackageamsmath
usepackageamsthm
letorigSSrenewcommandSifmmodemathopmathsfSelseorigSfi
begindocument
beginequationlabeleqn:decS
S=S_0 oplusS_1 .
endequation
enddocument


enter image description here




math-mode indexing




share|improve this question


















  • 3




    Because the mathop turns the "S" into an operator like lim and sum.
    – moewe
    Aug 18 at 19:29






  • 1




    What are you trying to do in the first place? What mathematical object is S suppose to be.
    – daleif
    Aug 18 at 19:34














up vote
6
down vote

favorite












Why are the subscripts placed under the letters and not in the right bottom corner like usual?



documentclass[a4paper,12pt,twoside]article
usepackage[utf8]inputenc
usepackage[T1]fontenc
usepackage[ngerman,english]babel
usepackagecsquotes
usepackageamssymb
usepackageamsmath
usepackageamsthm
letorigSSrenewcommandSifmmodemathopmathsfSelseorigSfi
begindocument
beginequationlabeleqn:decS
S=S_0 oplusS_1 .
endequation
enddocument


enter image description here




math-mode indexing




share|improve this question


















  • 3




    Because the mathop turns the "S" into an operator like lim and sum.
    – moewe
    Aug 18 at 19:29






  • 1




    What are you trying to do in the first place? What mathematical object is S suppose to be.
    – daleif
    Aug 18 at 19:34












up vote
6
down vote

favorite









up vote
6
down vote

favorite











Why are the subscripts placed under the letters and not in the right bottom corner like usual?



documentclass[a4paper,12pt,twoside]article
usepackage[utf8]inputenc
usepackage[T1]fontenc
usepackage[ngerman,english]babel
usepackagecsquotes
usepackageamssymb
usepackageamsmath
usepackageamsthm
letorigSSrenewcommandSifmmodemathopmathsfSelseorigSfi
begindocument
beginequationlabeleqn:decS
S=S_0 oplusS_1 .
endequation
enddocument


enter image description here




math-mode indexing




share|improve this question














Why are the subscripts placed under the letters and not in the right bottom corner like usual?



documentclass[a4paper,12pt,twoside]article
usepackage[utf8]inputenc
usepackage[T1]fontenc
usepackage[ngerman,english]babel
usepackagecsquotes
usepackageamssymb
usepackageamsmath
usepackageamsthm
letorigSSrenewcommandSifmmodemathopmathsfSelseorigSfi
begindocument
beginequationlabeleqn:decS
S=S_0 oplusS_1 .
endequation
enddocument


enter image description here





math-mode indexing





share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 18 at 19:36









Steven B. Segletes

146k9185387




146k9185387










asked Aug 18 at 19:27









user372565

27016




27016







  • 3




    Because the mathop turns the "S" into an operator like lim and sum.
    – moewe
    Aug 18 at 19:29






  • 1




    What are you trying to do in the first place? What mathematical object is S suppose to be.
    – daleif
    Aug 18 at 19:34












  • 3




    Because the mathop turns the "S" into an operator like lim and sum.
    – moewe
    Aug 18 at 19:29






  • 1




    What are you trying to do in the first place? What mathematical object is S suppose to be.
    – daleif
    Aug 18 at 19:34







3




3




Because the mathop turns the "S" into an operator like lim and sum.
– moewe
Aug 18 at 19:29




Because the mathop turns the "S" into an operator like lim and sum.
– moewe
Aug 18 at 19:29




1




1




What are you trying to do in the first place? What mathematical object is S suppose to be.
– daleif
Aug 18 at 19:34




What are you trying to do in the first place? What mathematical object is S suppose to be.
– daleif
Aug 18 at 19:34










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
7
down vote



accepted










You need nolimits to force mathop not to treat the operator like, for example, sum.



documentclass[a4paper,12pt,twoside]article
usepackage[utf8]inputenc
usepackage[T1]fontenc
usepackage[ngerman,english]babel
usepackagecsquotes
usepackageamssymb
usepackageamsmath
usepackageamsthm
letorigSSrenewcommandS%
 relaxifmmodemathopmathsfSnolimitselseorigSfi
begindocument
beginequationlabeleqn:decS
S=S_0 oplusS_1 .
endequation
[
beginpmatrixSendpmatrix
]
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


















  • 2




    Of course the question arises whether we are talking about an operator (in TeX speak, not necessarily mathematically) here in the first place. Maybe letorigSSrenewcommandSifmmodemathsfSelseorigSfi would be more sensible.
    – moewe
    Aug 18 at 19:38










  • You should try beginpmatrixSendpmatrix.
    – egreg
    Aug 18 at 20:19










  • @egreg Interesting, though given my logo, you can understand that I am not as shocked as I should be.
    – Steven B. Segletes
    Aug 18 at 20:36

















up vote
6
down vote













Assuming your command should be a mathop, the correct redefinition would be



renewcommandmathsection{operatornamemathsfS


Redefining S that way is bound to problems, as S is a “robust” command.



If it is not an operator, renewcommandmathsectionmathsfS would suffice.



You can see the difference in the two examples below (twocolumn used just for making a smaller picture). In (1) the symbol behaves like an operator, in (2) it's an ordinary symbol.



documentclass[a4paper,12pt,twocolumn]article
usepackage[utf8]inputenc
usepackage[T1]fontenc
usepackage[ngerman,english]babel
usepackagecsquotes
usepackageamssymb
usepackageamsmath
usepackageamsthm

renewcommandmathsectionoperatornamemathsfS

begindocument

beginequationlabeleqn:decS
S=S_0 oplusS_1 x.
endequation

renewcommandmathsectionmathsfS

beginequation
S=S_0 oplusS_1 x.
endequation

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f446600%2fredefine-s-problem-with-indices%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest

















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    7
    down vote



    accepted










    You need nolimits to force mathop not to treat the operator like, for example, sum.



    documentclass[a4paper,12pt,twoside]article
    usepackage[utf8]inputenc
    usepackage[T1]fontenc
    usepackage[ngerman,english]babel
    usepackagecsquotes
    usepackageamssymb
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackageamsthm
    letorigSSrenewcommandS%
     relaxifmmodemathopmathsfSnolimitselseorigSfi
    begindocument
    beginequationlabeleqn:decS
    S=S_0 oplusS_1 .
    endequation
    [
    beginpmatrixSendpmatrix
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer


















    • 2




      Of course the question arises whether we are talking about an operator (in TeX speak, not necessarily mathematically) here in the first place. Maybe letorigSSrenewcommandSifmmodemathsfSelseorigSfi would be more sensible.
      – moewe
      Aug 18 at 19:38










    • You should try beginpmatrixSendpmatrix.
      – egreg
      Aug 18 at 20:19










    • @egreg Interesting, though given my logo, you can understand that I am not as shocked as I should be.
      – Steven B. Segletes
      Aug 18 at 20:36














    up vote
    7
    down vote



    accepted










    You need nolimits to force mathop not to treat the operator like, for example, sum.



    documentclass[a4paper,12pt,twoside]article
    usepackage[utf8]inputenc
    usepackage[T1]fontenc
    usepackage[ngerman,english]babel
    usepackagecsquotes
    usepackageamssymb
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackageamsthm
    letorigSSrenewcommandS%
     relaxifmmodemathopmathsfSnolimitselseorigSfi
    begindocument
    beginequationlabeleqn:decS
    S=S_0 oplusS_1 .
    endequation
    [
    beginpmatrixSendpmatrix
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer


















    • 2




      Of course the question arises whether we are talking about an operator (in TeX speak, not necessarily mathematically) here in the first place. Maybe letorigSSrenewcommandSifmmodemathsfSelseorigSfi would be more sensible.
      – moewe
      Aug 18 at 19:38










    • You should try beginpmatrixSendpmatrix.
      – egreg
      Aug 18 at 20:19










    • @egreg Interesting, though given my logo, you can understand that I am not as shocked as I should be.
      – Steven B. Segletes
      Aug 18 at 20:36












    up vote
    7
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    7
    down vote



    accepted






    You need nolimits to force mathop not to treat the operator like, for example, sum.



    documentclass[a4paper,12pt,twoside]article
    usepackage[utf8]inputenc
    usepackage[T1]fontenc
    usepackage[ngerman,english]babel
    usepackagecsquotes
    usepackageamssymb
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackageamsthm
    letorigSSrenewcommandS%
     relaxifmmodemathopmathsfSnolimitselseorigSfi
    begindocument
    beginequationlabeleqn:decS
    S=S_0 oplusS_1 .
    endequation
    [
    beginpmatrixSendpmatrix
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer














    You need nolimits to force mathop not to treat the operator like, for example, sum.



    documentclass[a4paper,12pt,twoside]article
    usepackage[utf8]inputenc
    usepackage[T1]fontenc
    usepackage[ngerman,english]babel
    usepackagecsquotes
    usepackageamssymb
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackageamsthm
    letorigSSrenewcommandS%
     relaxifmmodemathopmathsfSnolimitselseorigSfi
    begindocument
    beginequationlabeleqn:decS
    S=S_0 oplusS_1 .
    endequation
    [
    beginpmatrixSendpmatrix
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Aug 18 at 22:20

























    answered Aug 18 at 19:34









    Steven B. Segletes

    146k9185387




    146k9185387







    • 2




      Of course the question arises whether we are talking about an operator (in TeX speak, not necessarily mathematically) here in the first place. Maybe letorigSSrenewcommandSifmmodemathsfSelseorigSfi would be more sensible.
      – moewe
      Aug 18 at 19:38










    • You should try beginpmatrixSendpmatrix.
      – egreg
      Aug 18 at 20:19










    • @egreg Interesting, though given my logo, you can understand that I am not as shocked as I should be.
      – Steven B. Segletes
      Aug 18 at 20:36












    • 2




      Of course the question arises whether we are talking about an operator (in TeX speak, not necessarily mathematically) here in the first place. Maybe letorigSSrenewcommandSifmmodemathsfSelseorigSfi would be more sensible.
      – moewe
      Aug 18 at 19:38










    • You should try beginpmatrixSendpmatrix.
      – egreg
      Aug 18 at 20:19










    • @egreg Interesting, though given my logo, you can understand that I am not as shocked as I should be.
      – Steven B. Segletes
      Aug 18 at 20:36







    2




    2




    Of course the question arises whether we are talking about an operator (in TeX speak, not necessarily mathematically) here in the first place. Maybe letorigSSrenewcommandSifmmodemathsfSelseorigSfi would be more sensible.
    – moewe
    Aug 18 at 19:38




    Of course the question arises whether we are talking about an operator (in TeX speak, not necessarily mathematically) here in the first place. Maybe letorigSSrenewcommandSifmmodemathsfSelseorigSfi would be more sensible.
    – moewe
    Aug 18 at 19:38












    You should try beginpmatrixSendpmatrix.
    – egreg
    Aug 18 at 20:19




    You should try beginpmatrixSendpmatrix.
    – egreg
    Aug 18 at 20:19












    @egreg Interesting, though given my logo, you can understand that I am not as shocked as I should be.
    – Steven B. Segletes
    Aug 18 at 20:36




    @egreg Interesting, though given my logo, you can understand that I am not as shocked as I should be.
    – Steven B. Segletes
    Aug 18 at 20:36










    up vote
    6
    down vote













    Assuming your command should be a mathop, the correct redefinition would be



    renewcommandmathsection{operatornamemathsfS


    Redefining S that way is bound to problems, as S is a “robust” command.



    If it is not an operator, renewcommandmathsectionmathsfS would suffice.



    You can see the difference in the two examples below (twocolumn used just for making a smaller picture). In (1) the symbol behaves like an operator, in (2) it's an ordinary symbol.



    documentclass[a4paper,12pt,twocolumn]article
    usepackage[utf8]inputenc
    usepackage[T1]fontenc
    usepackage[ngerman,english]babel
    usepackagecsquotes
    usepackageamssymb
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackageamsthm

    renewcommandmathsectionoperatornamemathsfS

    begindocument

    beginequationlabeleqn:decS
    S=S_0 oplusS_1 x.
    endequation

    renewcommandmathsectionmathsfS

    beginequation
    S=S_0 oplusS_1 x.
    endequation

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      6
      down vote













      Assuming your command should be a mathop, the correct redefinition would be



      renewcommandmathsection{operatornamemathsfS


      Redefining S that way is bound to problems, as S is a “robust” command.



      If it is not an operator, renewcommandmathsectionmathsfS would suffice.



      You can see the difference in the two examples below (twocolumn used just for making a smaller picture). In (1) the symbol behaves like an operator, in (2) it's an ordinary symbol.



      documentclass[a4paper,12pt,twocolumn]article
      usepackage[utf8]inputenc
      usepackage[T1]fontenc
      usepackage[ngerman,english]babel
      usepackagecsquotes
      usepackageamssymb
      usepackageamsmath
      usepackageamsthm

      renewcommandmathsectionoperatornamemathsfS

      begindocument

      beginequationlabeleqn:decS
      S=S_0 oplusS_1 x.
      endequation

      renewcommandmathsectionmathsfS

      beginequation
      S=S_0 oplusS_1 x.
      endequation

      enddocument


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        6
        down vote










        up vote
        6
        down vote









        Assuming your command should be a mathop, the correct redefinition would be



        renewcommandmathsection{operatornamemathsfS


        Redefining S that way is bound to problems, as S is a “robust” command.



        If it is not an operator, renewcommandmathsectionmathsfS would suffice.



        You can see the difference in the two examples below (twocolumn used just for making a smaller picture). In (1) the symbol behaves like an operator, in (2) it's an ordinary symbol.



        documentclass[a4paper,12pt,twocolumn]article
        usepackage[utf8]inputenc
        usepackage[T1]fontenc
        usepackage[ngerman,english]babel
        usepackagecsquotes
        usepackageamssymb
        usepackageamsmath
        usepackageamsthm

        renewcommandmathsectionoperatornamemathsfS

        begindocument

        beginequationlabeleqn:decS
        S=S_0 oplusS_1 x.
        endequation

        renewcommandmathsectionmathsfS

        beginequation
        S=S_0 oplusS_1 x.
        endequation

        enddocument


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer












        Assuming your command should be a mathop, the correct redefinition would be



        renewcommandmathsection{operatornamemathsfS


        Redefining S that way is bound to problems, as S is a “robust” command.



        If it is not an operator, renewcommandmathsectionmathsfS would suffice.



        You can see the difference in the two examples below (twocolumn used just for making a smaller picture). In (1) the symbol behaves like an operator, in (2) it's an ordinary symbol.



        documentclass[a4paper,12pt,twocolumn]article
        usepackage[utf8]inputenc
        usepackage[T1]fontenc
        usepackage[ngerman,english]babel
        usepackagecsquotes
        usepackageamssymb
        usepackageamsmath
        usepackageamsthm

        renewcommandmathsectionoperatornamemathsfS

        begindocument

        beginequationlabeleqn:decS
        S=S_0 oplusS_1 x.
        endequation

        renewcommandmathsectionmathsfS

        beginequation
        S=S_0 oplusS_1 x.
        endequation

        enddocument


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Aug 18 at 19:48









        egreg

        680k8318073051




        680k8318073051



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f446600%2fredefine-s-problem-with-indices%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest
































































            Comments

            Post a Comment

            Popular posts from this blog

            Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote 31 down vote favorite 4 I hold a PhD in mechanical engineering with a 7 year background in self-guided, self-paced research including 2 years as a graduate level course instructor and a subject matter expert for various engineering projects in a university setting in the United States. For the last 10-11 months, I am working in a research industry in France where my task is to debug C++ spaghetti code written over a period of several years by my current supervisor. It is a team of 2: just I and my supervisor. Diurnally, I am posed with a "bug of the day" to get out of this C++ code. My supervisor generally gives me about 15-30 minutes to solve it and then accosts me about whether or not the task is completed and then rinses and repeats this until the end of the day. Off-late, my supervisor has been holding 6-7 hour long "meetin
            Read more

            Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite Many fantasy worlds have multiple humanoid species (elves, orcs, humans, etc) living in the same world, in addition to that, they often have the ability to interbreed. And I can't help but question their believability... fantasy-races reproduction interspecies-relations share | improve this question edited Aug 9 at 14:46 Michael Kjörling ♦ 21.1k 10 85 161 asked Aug 9 at 13:13 Chlodio 118 6 closed as unclear what you're asking by MichaelK, Gryphon, John, Vincent, Frostfyre Aug 9 at 15:25 Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question. 3 Stack Exchange exist to
            Read more

            Confectionery

            Image
            Prepared foods made with a lot of sugar or other cabohydrates "Sweetmeat" redirects here. For the racehorse, see Sweetmeat (horse). Not to be confused with Sweetbread. This Kransekake is a traditional Scandinavian baker's confection. Confectionery is the art of making confections , which are food items that are rich in sugar and carbohydrates. Exact definitions are difficult. [1] In general, though, confectionery is divided into two broad and somewhat overlapping categories, bakers' confections and sugar confections. [2] Bakers' confectionery, also called flour confections , includes principally sweet pastries, cakes, and similar baked goods. Sugar confectionery includes candies ( sweets in British English), candied nuts, chocolates, chewing gum, bubble gum, pastillage, and other confections that are made primarily of sugar. In some cases, chocolate confections (confections made of chocolate) are treated as a separate category, as are sugar-free versions of
            Read more