Choosing a email format for workplace [duplicate]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
-1
down vote

favorite













This question already has an answer here:



  • What should a professional email address look like?

    5 answers



I am an admin at an institute and I need to create the staff email addresses. I am confused over which format to give. Some people use first and last name, and others use first name initial like johndoe@example.com or jdoe@example.com.



How do we decide on which format to use? What bases are email format decided on, and which appeal more in professionalism?







share|improve this question














marked as duplicate by CMW, Rhys, Jan Doggen, Jim G., AakashM Feb 5 '14 at 9:37


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 1




    I wouldn't lock things in too much. I once had a doctor who ended up with the unfortunate e-mail address of kum@<institution> this way. (First name, last initial.)
    – Loren Pechtel
    Feb 6 '14 at 19:02
















up vote
-1
down vote

favorite













This question already has an answer here:



  • What should a professional email address look like?

    5 answers



I am an admin at an institute and I need to create the staff email addresses. I am confused over which format to give. Some people use first and last name, and others use first name initial like johndoe@example.com or jdoe@example.com.



How do we decide on which format to use? What bases are email format decided on, and which appeal more in professionalism?







share|improve this question














marked as duplicate by CMW, Rhys, Jan Doggen, Jim G., AakashM Feb 5 '14 at 9:37


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 1




    I wouldn't lock things in too much. I once had a doctor who ended up with the unfortunate e-mail address of kum@<institution> this way. (First name, last initial.)
    – Loren Pechtel
    Feb 6 '14 at 19:02












up vote
-1
down vote

favorite









up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












This question already has an answer here:



  • What should a professional email address look like?

    5 answers



I am an admin at an institute and I need to create the staff email addresses. I am confused over which format to give. Some people use first and last name, and others use first name initial like johndoe@example.com or jdoe@example.com.



How do we decide on which format to use? What bases are email format decided on, and which appeal more in professionalism?







share|improve this question















This question already has an answer here:



  • What should a professional email address look like?

    5 answers



I am an admin at an institute and I need to create the staff email addresses. I am confused over which format to give. Some people use first and last name, and others use first name initial like johndoe@example.com or jdoe@example.com.



How do we decide on which format to use? What bases are email format decided on, and which appeal more in professionalism?





This question already has an answer here:



  • What should a professional email address look like?

    5 answers









share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 5 '14 at 8:14









Philipp

20.3k34885




20.3k34885










asked Feb 5 '14 at 7:47









cookieMonster

2,23662035




2,23662035




marked as duplicate by CMW, Rhys, Jan Doggen, Jim G., AakashM Feb 5 '14 at 9:37


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by CMW, Rhys, Jan Doggen, Jim G., AakashM Feb 5 '14 at 9:37


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









  • 1




    I wouldn't lock things in too much. I once had a doctor who ended up with the unfortunate e-mail address of kum@<institution> this way. (First name, last initial.)
    – Loren Pechtel
    Feb 6 '14 at 19:02












  • 1




    I wouldn't lock things in too much. I once had a doctor who ended up with the unfortunate e-mail address of kum@<institution> this way. (First name, last initial.)
    – Loren Pechtel
    Feb 6 '14 at 19:02







1




1




I wouldn't lock things in too much. I once had a doctor who ended up with the unfortunate e-mail address of kum@<institution> this way. (First name, last initial.)
– Loren Pechtel
Feb 6 '14 at 19:02




I wouldn't lock things in too much. I once had a doctor who ended up with the unfortunate e-mail address of kum@<institution> this way. (First name, last initial.)
– Loren Pechtel
Feb 6 '14 at 19:02










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










The shorter the email addresses, the easier they are to remember and the less likely do typos become. So you should keep them as short as possible.



But on the other hand, short names lead to collisions. When you have a Jack Smith and a Jacqueline Smith at your company, only one of them can be jsmith@example.com. And whoever gets that address will get mail intended for the other person from time to time, because your business partners will assume that all of your mail addresses use the same schema.



In the end it depends on the size of your organization. The smaller the company, the shorter the names you can get away with without having too many collisions.






share|improve this answer






















  • +1, exactly what I was going to say. Make the judgement between compactness and uniqueness based on the size of your organization.
    – Carson63000
    Feb 5 '14 at 22:20

















up vote
0
down vote













The email address should be straightforward, meaning, it should contain the name of the employee.



If my name is Lester P. Nubla, here are the sample formats:



  • lester.nubla@abc.com

  • lpnubla@abc.com

  • lnubla@abc.com

  • l.nubla@abc.com

  • Or the other way around (last name first before the given name)

You might want to consider the fact that there could be similar names, so you might want to include the middle initial.






share|improve this answer



























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    The shorter the email addresses, the easier they are to remember and the less likely do typos become. So you should keep them as short as possible.



    But on the other hand, short names lead to collisions. When you have a Jack Smith and a Jacqueline Smith at your company, only one of them can be jsmith@example.com. And whoever gets that address will get mail intended for the other person from time to time, because your business partners will assume that all of your mail addresses use the same schema.



    In the end it depends on the size of your organization. The smaller the company, the shorter the names you can get away with without having too many collisions.






    share|improve this answer






















    • +1, exactly what I was going to say. Make the judgement between compactness and uniqueness based on the size of your organization.
      – Carson63000
      Feb 5 '14 at 22:20














    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    The shorter the email addresses, the easier they are to remember and the less likely do typos become. So you should keep them as short as possible.



    But on the other hand, short names lead to collisions. When you have a Jack Smith and a Jacqueline Smith at your company, only one of them can be jsmith@example.com. And whoever gets that address will get mail intended for the other person from time to time, because your business partners will assume that all of your mail addresses use the same schema.



    In the end it depends on the size of your organization. The smaller the company, the shorter the names you can get away with without having too many collisions.






    share|improve this answer






















    • +1, exactly what I was going to say. Make the judgement between compactness and uniqueness based on the size of your organization.
      – Carson63000
      Feb 5 '14 at 22:20












    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted






    The shorter the email addresses, the easier they are to remember and the less likely do typos become. So you should keep them as short as possible.



    But on the other hand, short names lead to collisions. When you have a Jack Smith and a Jacqueline Smith at your company, only one of them can be jsmith@example.com. And whoever gets that address will get mail intended for the other person from time to time, because your business partners will assume that all of your mail addresses use the same schema.



    In the end it depends on the size of your organization. The smaller the company, the shorter the names you can get away with without having too many collisions.






    share|improve this answer














    The shorter the email addresses, the easier they are to remember and the less likely do typos become. So you should keep them as short as possible.



    But on the other hand, short names lead to collisions. When you have a Jack Smith and a Jacqueline Smith at your company, only one of them can be jsmith@example.com. And whoever gets that address will get mail intended for the other person from time to time, because your business partners will assume that all of your mail addresses use the same schema.



    In the end it depends on the size of your organization. The smaller the company, the shorter the names you can get away with without having too many collisions.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Feb 5 '14 at 22:52

























    answered Feb 5 '14 at 8:13









    Philipp

    20.3k34885




    20.3k34885











    • +1, exactly what I was going to say. Make the judgement between compactness and uniqueness based on the size of your organization.
      – Carson63000
      Feb 5 '14 at 22:20
















    • +1, exactly what I was going to say. Make the judgement between compactness and uniqueness based on the size of your organization.
      – Carson63000
      Feb 5 '14 at 22:20















    +1, exactly what I was going to say. Make the judgement between compactness and uniqueness based on the size of your organization.
    – Carson63000
    Feb 5 '14 at 22:20




    +1, exactly what I was going to say. Make the judgement between compactness and uniqueness based on the size of your organization.
    – Carson63000
    Feb 5 '14 at 22:20












    up vote
    0
    down vote













    The email address should be straightforward, meaning, it should contain the name of the employee.



    If my name is Lester P. Nubla, here are the sample formats:



    • lester.nubla@abc.com

    • lpnubla@abc.com

    • lnubla@abc.com

    • l.nubla@abc.com

    • Or the other way around (last name first before the given name)

    You might want to consider the fact that there could be similar names, so you might want to include the middle initial.






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      The email address should be straightforward, meaning, it should contain the name of the employee.



      If my name is Lester P. Nubla, here are the sample formats:



      • lester.nubla@abc.com

      • lpnubla@abc.com

      • lnubla@abc.com

      • l.nubla@abc.com

      • Or the other way around (last name first before the given name)

      You might want to consider the fact that there could be similar names, so you might want to include the middle initial.






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        The email address should be straightforward, meaning, it should contain the name of the employee.



        If my name is Lester P. Nubla, here are the sample formats:



        • lester.nubla@abc.com

        • lpnubla@abc.com

        • lnubla@abc.com

        • l.nubla@abc.com

        • Or the other way around (last name first before the given name)

        You might want to consider the fact that there could be similar names, so you might want to include the middle initial.






        share|improve this answer












        The email address should be straightforward, meaning, it should contain the name of the employee.



        If my name is Lester P. Nubla, here are the sample formats:



        • lester.nubla@abc.com

        • lpnubla@abc.com

        • lnubla@abc.com

        • l.nubla@abc.com

        • Or the other way around (last name first before the given name)

        You might want to consider the fact that there could be similar names, so you might want to include the middle initial.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Feb 5 '14 at 8:11









        Lester Nubla

        585511




        585511












            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What does second last employer means? [closed]

            List of Gilmore Girls characters

            Confectionery