Limit of sum of sequences at infinity

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite













Given two sequences $$a_n=int_0^1 (1-x^2)^n dx$$ and $$b_n=int_0^1 (1-x^3)^n dx$$ ,($nin N$) then find the value of $$L=lim_nto infty (10 sqrt [n]a_n +5sqrt [n]b_n)$$





My try:



$$a_n=int_0^1 (1-x^2)^n dx= frac 12 Bleft( n+1, 1/2right)=frac 12cdot frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/2)Gammaleft(n +frac 32right)$$



Similarly $$b_n=frac 13cdot frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/3)Gammaleft(n +frac 43right)$$



Now let's consider $$J=lim_nto infty (b_n)^1/n =lim_nto infty left(frac 13right)^1/ncdot left(frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/3)Gammaleft(n +frac 43right)right) ^1/n$$ $$=lim_ntoinfty left(frac 13right)^1/ncdot left(lim_nto infty left(frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/3)Gammaleft(n +frac 43right)right) ^1/nright)$$ $$=1cdot lim_nto infty left(frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/3)Gammaleft(n +frac 43right)right) ^1/n$$ $$=exp left( lim_ntoinfty frac ln(Gamma(n+1)) +ln(Gamma(1/3))-ln(Gamma(n +4/3))nright)$$



Now by L'Hospital we have $$exp left( lim_nto infty frac ln(Gamma(n+1)) +ln(Gamma(1/3))-ln(Gamma(n +4/3))nright) =expleft( lim_nto infty left[psi(n+1) -psi(n+ 4/3)right] right)$$



But for large $x$, $psi(x)sim ln (x)$ Hence $$exp left( lim_nto infty left[psi(n+1) -psi(n+ 4/3)right]right)=exp left( lim_nto infty left[ln(n+1) -ln(n+ 4/3)right]right)=1$$



Similarly $$lim_nto infty (a_n)^1/n= 1$$



Hence giving me the answer as $15$.



I want to know whether I am correct or not. And if I am correct I want to know if there is any other simple and elementary method to solve the question.




Edit:



By some other method I dont mean that just converting the Gamma function to factorial representation and then using Stirling's approximation







share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite













    Given two sequences $$a_n=int_0^1 (1-x^2)^n dx$$ and $$b_n=int_0^1 (1-x^3)^n dx$$ ,($nin N$) then find the value of $$L=lim_nto infty (10 sqrt [n]a_n +5sqrt [n]b_n)$$





    My try:



    $$a_n=int_0^1 (1-x^2)^n dx= frac 12 Bleft( n+1, 1/2right)=frac 12cdot frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/2)Gammaleft(n +frac 32right)$$



    Similarly $$b_n=frac 13cdot frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/3)Gammaleft(n +frac 43right)$$



    Now let's consider $$J=lim_nto infty (b_n)^1/n =lim_nto infty left(frac 13right)^1/ncdot left(frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/3)Gammaleft(n +frac 43right)right) ^1/n$$ $$=lim_ntoinfty left(frac 13right)^1/ncdot left(lim_nto infty left(frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/3)Gammaleft(n +frac 43right)right) ^1/nright)$$ $$=1cdot lim_nto infty left(frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/3)Gammaleft(n +frac 43right)right) ^1/n$$ $$=exp left( lim_ntoinfty frac ln(Gamma(n+1)) +ln(Gamma(1/3))-ln(Gamma(n +4/3))nright)$$



    Now by L'Hospital we have $$exp left( lim_nto infty frac ln(Gamma(n+1)) +ln(Gamma(1/3))-ln(Gamma(n +4/3))nright) =expleft( lim_nto infty left[psi(n+1) -psi(n+ 4/3)right] right)$$



    But for large $x$, $psi(x)sim ln (x)$ Hence $$exp left( lim_nto infty left[psi(n+1) -psi(n+ 4/3)right]right)=exp left( lim_nto infty left[ln(n+1) -ln(n+ 4/3)right]right)=1$$



    Similarly $$lim_nto infty (a_n)^1/n= 1$$



    Hence giving me the answer as $15$.



    I want to know whether I am correct or not. And if I am correct I want to know if there is any other simple and elementary method to solve the question.




    Edit:



    By some other method I dont mean that just converting the Gamma function to factorial representation and then using Stirling's approximation







    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite












      Given two sequences $$a_n=int_0^1 (1-x^2)^n dx$$ and $$b_n=int_0^1 (1-x^3)^n dx$$ ,($nin N$) then find the value of $$L=lim_nto infty (10 sqrt [n]a_n +5sqrt [n]b_n)$$





      My try:



      $$a_n=int_0^1 (1-x^2)^n dx= frac 12 Bleft( n+1, 1/2right)=frac 12cdot frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/2)Gammaleft(n +frac 32right)$$



      Similarly $$b_n=frac 13cdot frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/3)Gammaleft(n +frac 43right)$$



      Now let's consider $$J=lim_nto infty (b_n)^1/n =lim_nto infty left(frac 13right)^1/ncdot left(frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/3)Gammaleft(n +frac 43right)right) ^1/n$$ $$=lim_ntoinfty left(frac 13right)^1/ncdot left(lim_nto infty left(frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/3)Gammaleft(n +frac 43right)right) ^1/nright)$$ $$=1cdot lim_nto infty left(frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/3)Gammaleft(n +frac 43right)right) ^1/n$$ $$=exp left( lim_ntoinfty frac ln(Gamma(n+1)) +ln(Gamma(1/3))-ln(Gamma(n +4/3))nright)$$



      Now by L'Hospital we have $$exp left( lim_nto infty frac ln(Gamma(n+1)) +ln(Gamma(1/3))-ln(Gamma(n +4/3))nright) =expleft( lim_nto infty left[psi(n+1) -psi(n+ 4/3)right] right)$$



      But for large $x$, $psi(x)sim ln (x)$ Hence $$exp left( lim_nto infty left[psi(n+1) -psi(n+ 4/3)right]right)=exp left( lim_nto infty left[ln(n+1) -ln(n+ 4/3)right]right)=1$$



      Similarly $$lim_nto infty (a_n)^1/n= 1$$



      Hence giving me the answer as $15$.



      I want to know whether I am correct or not. And if I am correct I want to know if there is any other simple and elementary method to solve the question.




      Edit:



      By some other method I dont mean that just converting the Gamma function to factorial representation and then using Stirling's approximation







      share|cite|improve this question















      Given two sequences $$a_n=int_0^1 (1-x^2)^n dx$$ and $$b_n=int_0^1 (1-x^3)^n dx$$ ,($nin N$) then find the value of $$L=lim_nto infty (10 sqrt [n]a_n +5sqrt [n]b_n)$$





      My try:



      $$a_n=int_0^1 (1-x^2)^n dx= frac 12 Bleft( n+1, 1/2right)=frac 12cdot frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/2)Gammaleft(n +frac 32right)$$



      Similarly $$b_n=frac 13cdot frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/3)Gammaleft(n +frac 43right)$$



      Now let's consider $$J=lim_nto infty (b_n)^1/n =lim_nto infty left(frac 13right)^1/ncdot left(frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/3)Gammaleft(n +frac 43right)right) ^1/n$$ $$=lim_ntoinfty left(frac 13right)^1/ncdot left(lim_nto infty left(frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/3)Gammaleft(n +frac 43right)right) ^1/nright)$$ $$=1cdot lim_nto infty left(frac Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1/3)Gammaleft(n +frac 43right)right) ^1/n$$ $$=exp left( lim_ntoinfty frac ln(Gamma(n+1)) +ln(Gamma(1/3))-ln(Gamma(n +4/3))nright)$$



      Now by L'Hospital we have $$exp left( lim_nto infty frac ln(Gamma(n+1)) +ln(Gamma(1/3))-ln(Gamma(n +4/3))nright) =expleft( lim_nto infty left[psi(n+1) -psi(n+ 4/3)right] right)$$



      But for large $x$, $psi(x)sim ln (x)$ Hence $$exp left( lim_nto infty left[psi(n+1) -psi(n+ 4/3)right]right)=exp left( lim_nto infty left[ln(n+1) -ln(n+ 4/3)right]right)=1$$



      Similarly $$lim_nto infty (a_n)^1/n= 1$$



      Hence giving me the answer as $15$.



      I want to know whether I am correct or not. And if I am correct I want to know if there is any other simple and elementary method to solve the question.




      Edit:



      By some other method I dont mean that just converting the Gamma function to factorial representation and then using Stirling's approximation









      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Sep 8 at 13:43

























      asked Sep 7 at 6:05









      Manthanein

      6,3831439




      6,3831439




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          7
          down vote



          accepted










          A much simpler approach. Let $k$ be a positive integer. Then for $xin [0,1]$,
          $$1-xleq 1-x^kleq 1$$
          and therefore
          $$frac1n+1=int_0^1 (1-x)^n dxleq a_n(k):=int_0^1 (1-x^k)^n dxleq 1.$$
          Hence, as $ntoinfty$,
          $$1leftarrowfrac1sqrt[n]n+1lesqrt[n]a_n(k)leq sqrt[n]1=1$$
          and by the Squeeze Theorem it follows that $sqrt[n]a_n(k)rightarrow 1$. In your case, we need the limit for $k=2$ and $k=3$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





























            up vote
            4
            down vote













            There is a very simple method of evaluating $L$. Fort any bounded measurable function $f$ on $[0,1]$ we have $lim (int_0^1 |f|^p)^1/p to |f|_infty$ as $ p to infty$. Hence $a_n^1/n to max (1-x^2): 0leq x leq 1=1$. Similarly $b_n^1/n to 1$. So $L=10+5=15$. Actually, th result I have quoted is easy to prove in this case. Note that $int_0^1 (1-x^2)^n leq 1$. Also $int_0^1 (1-x^2)^n geq int_0^t (1-x^2)^n geq t(1-t^2)^n$ for each $t$. Take n-th root and conclude that $lim inf a_n^1/n geq 1-t^2$ for anty $t>0$. Let $t to 0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer






















            • Where does this result come from? Any references might help me a bit
              – Manthanein
              Sep 7 at 6:27










            • This is a 'popular' exercise from Rudin's book and you can get it easily from MSE.
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              Sep 7 at 6:28










            • Some MSE links please?????
              – Manthanein
              Sep 7 at 6:29










            • @Manthanein I have included a proof now.
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              Sep 7 at 6:36










            • Does this result have it's origin in the space theory or measure theory or something related. If yes then I am really sorry sir because I don't have quite an idea about those chapters. I am just in the 12th standard as of now. But I will try to understand the proofs so that I could use this result in near future.
              – Manthanein
              Sep 7 at 6:45











            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2908317%2flimit-of-sum-of-sequences-at-infinity%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            7
            down vote



            accepted










            A much simpler approach. Let $k$ be a positive integer. Then for $xin [0,1]$,
            $$1-xleq 1-x^kleq 1$$
            and therefore
            $$frac1n+1=int_0^1 (1-x)^n dxleq a_n(k):=int_0^1 (1-x^k)^n dxleq 1.$$
            Hence, as $ntoinfty$,
            $$1leftarrowfrac1sqrt[n]n+1lesqrt[n]a_n(k)leq sqrt[n]1=1$$
            and by the Squeeze Theorem it follows that $sqrt[n]a_n(k)rightarrow 1$. In your case, we need the limit for $k=2$ and $k=3$.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              up vote
              7
              down vote



              accepted










              A much simpler approach. Let $k$ be a positive integer. Then for $xin [0,1]$,
              $$1-xleq 1-x^kleq 1$$
              and therefore
              $$frac1n+1=int_0^1 (1-x)^n dxleq a_n(k):=int_0^1 (1-x^k)^n dxleq 1.$$
              Hence, as $ntoinfty$,
              $$1leftarrowfrac1sqrt[n]n+1lesqrt[n]a_n(k)leq sqrt[n]1=1$$
              and by the Squeeze Theorem it follows that $sqrt[n]a_n(k)rightarrow 1$. In your case, we need the limit for $k=2$ and $k=3$.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                7
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                7
                down vote



                accepted






                A much simpler approach. Let $k$ be a positive integer. Then for $xin [0,1]$,
                $$1-xleq 1-x^kleq 1$$
                and therefore
                $$frac1n+1=int_0^1 (1-x)^n dxleq a_n(k):=int_0^1 (1-x^k)^n dxleq 1.$$
                Hence, as $ntoinfty$,
                $$1leftarrowfrac1sqrt[n]n+1lesqrt[n]a_n(k)leq sqrt[n]1=1$$
                and by the Squeeze Theorem it follows that $sqrt[n]a_n(k)rightarrow 1$. In your case, we need the limit for $k=2$ and $k=3$.






                share|cite|improve this answer














                A much simpler approach. Let $k$ be a positive integer. Then for $xin [0,1]$,
                $$1-xleq 1-x^kleq 1$$
                and therefore
                $$frac1n+1=int_0^1 (1-x)^n dxleq a_n(k):=int_0^1 (1-x^k)^n dxleq 1.$$
                Hence, as $ntoinfty$,
                $$1leftarrowfrac1sqrt[n]n+1lesqrt[n]a_n(k)leq sqrt[n]1=1$$
                and by the Squeeze Theorem it follows that $sqrt[n]a_n(k)rightarrow 1$. In your case, we need the limit for $k=2$ and $k=3$.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Sep 7 at 7:33









                amsmath

                2,406114




                2,406114










                answered Sep 7 at 6:23









                Robert Z

                85.5k1055123




                85.5k1055123




















                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote













                    There is a very simple method of evaluating $L$. Fort any bounded measurable function $f$ on $[0,1]$ we have $lim (int_0^1 |f|^p)^1/p to |f|_infty$ as $ p to infty$. Hence $a_n^1/n to max (1-x^2): 0leq x leq 1=1$. Similarly $b_n^1/n to 1$. So $L=10+5=15$. Actually, th result I have quoted is easy to prove in this case. Note that $int_0^1 (1-x^2)^n leq 1$. Also $int_0^1 (1-x^2)^n geq int_0^t (1-x^2)^n geq t(1-t^2)^n$ for each $t$. Take n-th root and conclude that $lim inf a_n^1/n geq 1-t^2$ for anty $t>0$. Let $t to 0$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer






















                    • Where does this result come from? Any references might help me a bit
                      – Manthanein
                      Sep 7 at 6:27










                    • This is a 'popular' exercise from Rudin's book and you can get it easily from MSE.
                      – Kavi Rama Murthy
                      Sep 7 at 6:28










                    • Some MSE links please?????
                      – Manthanein
                      Sep 7 at 6:29










                    • @Manthanein I have included a proof now.
                      – Kavi Rama Murthy
                      Sep 7 at 6:36










                    • Does this result have it's origin in the space theory or measure theory or something related. If yes then I am really sorry sir because I don't have quite an idea about those chapters. I am just in the 12th standard as of now. But I will try to understand the proofs so that I could use this result in near future.
                      – Manthanein
                      Sep 7 at 6:45















                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote













                    There is a very simple method of evaluating $L$. Fort any bounded measurable function $f$ on $[0,1]$ we have $lim (int_0^1 |f|^p)^1/p to |f|_infty$ as $ p to infty$. Hence $a_n^1/n to max (1-x^2): 0leq x leq 1=1$. Similarly $b_n^1/n to 1$. So $L=10+5=15$. Actually, th result I have quoted is easy to prove in this case. Note that $int_0^1 (1-x^2)^n leq 1$. Also $int_0^1 (1-x^2)^n geq int_0^t (1-x^2)^n geq t(1-t^2)^n$ for each $t$. Take n-th root and conclude that $lim inf a_n^1/n geq 1-t^2$ for anty $t>0$. Let $t to 0$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer






















                    • Where does this result come from? Any references might help me a bit
                      – Manthanein
                      Sep 7 at 6:27










                    • This is a 'popular' exercise from Rudin's book and you can get it easily from MSE.
                      – Kavi Rama Murthy
                      Sep 7 at 6:28










                    • Some MSE links please?????
                      – Manthanein
                      Sep 7 at 6:29










                    • @Manthanein I have included a proof now.
                      – Kavi Rama Murthy
                      Sep 7 at 6:36










                    • Does this result have it's origin in the space theory or measure theory or something related. If yes then I am really sorry sir because I don't have quite an idea about those chapters. I am just in the 12th standard as of now. But I will try to understand the proofs so that I could use this result in near future.
                      – Manthanein
                      Sep 7 at 6:45













                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote









                    There is a very simple method of evaluating $L$. Fort any bounded measurable function $f$ on $[0,1]$ we have $lim (int_0^1 |f|^p)^1/p to |f|_infty$ as $ p to infty$. Hence $a_n^1/n to max (1-x^2): 0leq x leq 1=1$. Similarly $b_n^1/n to 1$. So $L=10+5=15$. Actually, th result I have quoted is easy to prove in this case. Note that $int_0^1 (1-x^2)^n leq 1$. Also $int_0^1 (1-x^2)^n geq int_0^t (1-x^2)^n geq t(1-t^2)^n$ for each $t$. Take n-th root and conclude that $lim inf a_n^1/n geq 1-t^2$ for anty $t>0$. Let $t to 0$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    There is a very simple method of evaluating $L$. Fort any bounded measurable function $f$ on $[0,1]$ we have $lim (int_0^1 |f|^p)^1/p to |f|_infty$ as $ p to infty$. Hence $a_n^1/n to max (1-x^2): 0leq x leq 1=1$. Similarly $b_n^1/n to 1$. So $L=10+5=15$. Actually, th result I have quoted is easy to prove in this case. Note that $int_0^1 (1-x^2)^n leq 1$. Also $int_0^1 (1-x^2)^n geq int_0^t (1-x^2)^n geq t(1-t^2)^n$ for each $t$. Take n-th root and conclude that $lim inf a_n^1/n geq 1-t^2$ for anty $t>0$. Let $t to 0$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Sep 7 at 7:29

























                    answered Sep 7 at 6:25









                    Kavi Rama Murthy

                    25.2k31335




                    25.2k31335











                    • Where does this result come from? Any references might help me a bit
                      – Manthanein
                      Sep 7 at 6:27










                    • This is a 'popular' exercise from Rudin's book and you can get it easily from MSE.
                      – Kavi Rama Murthy
                      Sep 7 at 6:28










                    • Some MSE links please?????
                      – Manthanein
                      Sep 7 at 6:29










                    • @Manthanein I have included a proof now.
                      – Kavi Rama Murthy
                      Sep 7 at 6:36










                    • Does this result have it's origin in the space theory or measure theory or something related. If yes then I am really sorry sir because I don't have quite an idea about those chapters. I am just in the 12th standard as of now. But I will try to understand the proofs so that I could use this result in near future.
                      – Manthanein
                      Sep 7 at 6:45

















                    • Where does this result come from? Any references might help me a bit
                      – Manthanein
                      Sep 7 at 6:27










                    • This is a 'popular' exercise from Rudin's book and you can get it easily from MSE.
                      – Kavi Rama Murthy
                      Sep 7 at 6:28










                    • Some MSE links please?????
                      – Manthanein
                      Sep 7 at 6:29










                    • @Manthanein I have included a proof now.
                      – Kavi Rama Murthy
                      Sep 7 at 6:36










                    • Does this result have it's origin in the space theory or measure theory or something related. If yes then I am really sorry sir because I don't have quite an idea about those chapters. I am just in the 12th standard as of now. But I will try to understand the proofs so that I could use this result in near future.
                      – Manthanein
                      Sep 7 at 6:45
















                    Where does this result come from? Any references might help me a bit
                    – Manthanein
                    Sep 7 at 6:27




                    Where does this result come from? Any references might help me a bit
                    – Manthanein
                    Sep 7 at 6:27












                    This is a 'popular' exercise from Rudin's book and you can get it easily from MSE.
                    – Kavi Rama Murthy
                    Sep 7 at 6:28




                    This is a 'popular' exercise from Rudin's book and you can get it easily from MSE.
                    – Kavi Rama Murthy
                    Sep 7 at 6:28












                    Some MSE links please?????
                    – Manthanein
                    Sep 7 at 6:29




                    Some MSE links please?????
                    – Manthanein
                    Sep 7 at 6:29












                    @Manthanein I have included a proof now.
                    – Kavi Rama Murthy
                    Sep 7 at 6:36




                    @Manthanein I have included a proof now.
                    – Kavi Rama Murthy
                    Sep 7 at 6:36












                    Does this result have it's origin in the space theory or measure theory or something related. If yes then I am really sorry sir because I don't have quite an idea about those chapters. I am just in the 12th standard as of now. But I will try to understand the proofs so that I could use this result in near future.
                    – Manthanein
                    Sep 7 at 6:45





                    Does this result have it's origin in the space theory or measure theory or something related. If yes then I am really sorry sir because I don't have quite an idea about those chapters. I am just in the 12th standard as of now. But I will try to understand the proofs so that I could use this result in near future.
                    – Manthanein
                    Sep 7 at 6:45


















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2908317%2flimit-of-sum-of-sequences-at-infinity%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What does second last employer means? [closed]

                    List of Gilmore Girls characters

                    Confectionery