Mixing
Does Arxiv count as publication? [duplicate]
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
Can something published on arXiv or optimization-online.org be mentioned in my CV?
3 answers
I am an undergraduate student graduating next month. I wrote a research paper done by myself, but it's been rejected by two journals sofar so I haven't been able to publish it.
I am applying for scholarships and having a published paper would improve my chances.
If i upload my paper in arxiv, is it considered as published paper? can i write it in my cv as published paper and what is the most suitable way to write it *in my cv?
Thank you!
publications cv research-undergraduate arxiv
edited Aug 25 at 13:17
scaaahu
11.8k84094
asked Aug 25 at 12:55
Ab Rohi
333
marked as duplicate by scaaahu, Jukka Suomela, Scientist, Buzz, Richard Erickson Aug 25 at 15:17
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
Can something published on arXiv or optimization-online.org be mentioned in my CV?
3 answers
I am an undergraduate student graduating next month. I wrote a research paper done by myself, but it's been rejected by two journals sofar so I haven't been able to publish it.
I am applying for scholarships and having a published paper would improve my chances.
If i upload my paper in arxiv, is it considered as published paper? can i write it in my cv as published paper and what is the most suitable way to write it *in my cv?
Thank you!
publications cv research-undergraduate arxiv
edited Aug 25 at 13:17
scaaahu
11.8k84094
asked Aug 25 at 12:55
Ab Rohi
333
marked as duplicate by scaaahu, Jukka Suomela, Scientist, Buzz, Richard Erickson Aug 25 at 15:17
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
3
Someone already gave an answer, but let me mention something. When you put something on arXiv, they will never remove it (unless in some exceptional circumstances such as copyright infringement, or if you upload something which is a not a research paper at all). If your paper has such issues that it has been rejected twice, you may want to be careful before making it public.
– Najib Idrissi
Aug 25 at 13:42
@NajibIdrissi then should i just let it and take it to bookshelf for ever? Is there any place to put "a rejected paper" or a place to collect a bunch of rejected paper?
– Ab Rohi
Aug 25 at 14:08
1
Not an answer to your question, but if the paper has been rejected twice you need to know why before you decide if you want to make it part of a permanent public archive. If you have not gotten useful feedback from the journals then you probably want to find your own reviewer—a person with solid domain knowledge who and experience in writing published papers but not affiliated with the work who would be willing to read it and give you an honest enumeration of it's weaknesses.
– dmckee
Aug 25 at 15:36
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
Can something published on arXiv or optimization-online.org be mentioned in my CV?
3 answers
I am an undergraduate student graduating next month. I wrote a research paper done by myself, but it's been rejected by two journals sofar so I haven't been able to publish it.
I am applying for scholarships and having a published paper would improve my chances.
If i upload my paper in arxiv, is it considered as published paper? can i write it in my cv as published paper and what is the most suitable way to write it *in my cv?
Thank you!
publications cv research-undergraduate arxiv
edited Aug 25 at 13:17
scaaahu
11.8k84094
asked Aug 25 at 12:55
Ab Rohi
333
This question already has an answer here:
Can something published on arXiv or optimization-online.org be mentioned in my CV?
3 answers
I am an undergraduate student graduating next month. I wrote a research paper done by myself, but it's been rejected by two journals sofar so I haven't been able to publish it.
I am applying for scholarships and having a published paper would improve my chances.
If i upload my paper in arxiv, is it considered as published paper? can i write it in my cv as published paper and what is the most suitable way to write it *in my cv?
Thank you!
This question already has an answer here:
Can something published on arXiv or optimization-online.org be mentioned in my CV?
3 answers
publications cv research-undergraduate arxiv
edited Aug 25 at 13:17
scaaahu
11.8k84094
asked Aug 25 at 12:55
Ab Rohi
333
edited Aug 25 at 13:17
scaaahu
11.8k84094
edited Aug 25 at 13:17
scaaahu
11.8k84094
edited Aug 25 at 13:17
scaaahu
11.8k84094
11.8k84094
asked Aug 25 at 12:55
Ab Rohi
333
asked Aug 25 at 12:55
Ab Rohi
333
asked Aug 25 at 12:55
Ab Rohi
333
333
marked as duplicate by scaaahu, Jukka Suomela, Scientist, Buzz, Richard Erickson Aug 25 at 15:17
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by scaaahu, Jukka Suomela, Scientist, Buzz, Richard Erickson Aug 25 at 15:17
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
3
Someone already gave an answer, but let me mention something. When you put something on arXiv, they will never remove it (unless in some exceptional circumstances such as copyright infringement, or if you upload something which is a not a research paper at all). If your paper has such issues that it has been rejected twice, you may want to be careful before making it public.
– Najib Idrissi
Aug 25 at 13:42
@NajibIdrissi then should i just let it and take it to bookshelf for ever? Is there any place to put "a rejected paper" or a place to collect a bunch of rejected paper?
– Ab Rohi
Aug 25 at 14:08
1
Not an answer to your question, but if the paper has been rejected twice you need to know why before you decide if you want to make it part of a permanent public archive. If you have not gotten useful feedback from the journals then you probably want to find your own reviewer—a person with solid domain knowledge who and experience in writing published papers but not affiliated with the work who would be willing to read it and give you an honest enumeration of it's weaknesses.
– dmckee
Aug 25 at 15:36
add a comment |Â
3
Someone already gave an answer, but let me mention something. When you put something on arXiv, they will never remove it (unless in some exceptional circumstances such as copyright infringement, or if you upload something which is a not a research paper at all). If your paper has such issues that it has been rejected twice, you may want to be careful before making it public.
– Najib Idrissi
Aug 25 at 13:42
@NajibIdrissi then should i just let it and take it to bookshelf for ever? Is there any place to put "a rejected paper" or a place to collect a bunch of rejected paper?
– Ab Rohi
Aug 25 at 14:08
1
Not an answer to your question, but if the paper has been rejected twice you need to know why before you decide if you want to make it part of a permanent public archive. If you have not gotten useful feedback from the journals then you probably want to find your own reviewer—a person with solid domain knowledge who and experience in writing published papers but not affiliated with the work who would be willing to read it and give you an honest enumeration of it's weaknesses.
– dmckee
Aug 25 at 15:36
3
3
Someone already gave an answer, but let me mention something. When you put something on arXiv, they will never remove it (unless in some exceptional circumstances such as copyright infringement, or if you upload something which is a not a research paper at all). If your paper has such issues that it has been rejected twice, you may want to be careful before making it public.
– Najib Idrissi
Aug 25 at 13:42
Someone already gave an answer, but let me mention something. When you put something on arXiv, they will never remove it (unless in some exceptional circumstances such as copyright infringement, or if you upload something which is a not a research paper at all). If your paper has such issues that it has been rejected twice, you may want to be careful before making it public.
– Najib Idrissi
Aug 25 at 13:42
@NajibIdrissi then should i just let it and take it to bookshelf for ever? Is there any place to put "a rejected paper" or a place to collect a bunch of rejected paper?
– Ab Rohi
Aug 25 at 14:08
@NajibIdrissi then should i just let it and take it to bookshelf for ever? Is there any place to put "a rejected paper" or a place to collect a bunch of rejected paper?
– Ab Rohi
Aug 25 at 14:08
1
1
Not an answer to your question, but if the paper has been rejected twice you need to know why before you decide if you want to make it part of a permanent public archive. If you have not gotten useful feedback from the journals then you probably want to find your own reviewer—a person with solid domain knowledge who and experience in writing published papers but not affiliated with the work who would be willing to read it and give you an honest enumeration of it's weaknesses.
– dmckee
Aug 25 at 15:36
Not an answer to your question, but if the paper has been rejected twice you need to know why before you decide if you want to make it part of a permanent public archive. If you have not gotten useful feedback from the journals then you probably want to find your own reviewer—a person with solid domain knowledge who and experience in writing published papers but not affiliated with the work who would be willing to read it and give you an honest enumeration of it's weaknesses.
– dmckee
Aug 25 at 15:36
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
No, it's not considered a published paper in the usual sense of peer-reviewed publications. ArXiv is meant as a preprint server where you upload preprint versions (essentially polished draft versions) to quickly disseminate your research, before submitting it to a scholarly journal where the paper undergoes peer review. Only after the paper has been peer-reviewed and published by the journal do you have a "real" publication. (Depending on your agreement with the journal, it's then possible to update the arXiv listing to reflect revisions made to the manuscript during the publication process.)
It's still appropriate to list such preprints on your CV - especially early on in a career, when you might have few peer-reviewed publications. This is fine as long as it's made clear that these are preprints, or manuscripts under review or similar.
answered Aug 25 at 13:23
Anyon
2,66011626
2
This. It goes on you "List of Publications", but you don't refer to the paper as "published".
– dmckee
Aug 25 at 15:33
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
I would say it does count as a publication if you need to reference it in your own work/papers. So if you publish a result you can reference this ArXiV paper.
However, it does not count as a peer-review publication in the sense that it does not "add" points/credit to your cv.
answered Aug 25 at 14:54
Dilworth
3,6351219
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
No, it's not considered a published paper in the usual sense of peer-reviewed publications. ArXiv is meant as a preprint server where you upload preprint versions (essentially polished draft versions) to quickly disseminate your research, before submitting it to a scholarly journal where the paper undergoes peer review. Only after the paper has been peer-reviewed and published by the journal do you have a "real" publication. (Depending on your agreement with the journal, it's then possible to update the arXiv listing to reflect revisions made to the manuscript during the publication process.)
It's still appropriate to list such preprints on your CV - especially early on in a career, when you might have few peer-reviewed publications. This is fine as long as it's made clear that these are preprints, or manuscripts under review or similar.
answered Aug 25 at 13:23
Anyon
2,66011626
2
This. It goes on you "List of Publications", but you don't refer to the paper as "published".
– dmckee
Aug 25 at 15:33
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
No, it's not considered a published paper in the usual sense of peer-reviewed publications. ArXiv is meant as a preprint server where you upload preprint versions (essentially polished draft versions) to quickly disseminate your research, before submitting it to a scholarly journal where the paper undergoes peer review. Only after the paper has been peer-reviewed and published by the journal do you have a "real" publication. (Depending on your agreement with the journal, it's then possible to update the arXiv listing to reflect revisions made to the manuscript during the publication process.)
It's still appropriate to list such preprints on your CV - especially early on in a career, when you might have few peer-reviewed publications. This is fine as long as it's made clear that these are preprints, or manuscripts under review or similar.
answered Aug 25 at 13:23
Anyon
2,66011626
2
This. It goes on you "List of Publications", but you don't refer to the paper as "published".
– dmckee
Aug 25 at 15:33
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
No, it's not considered a published paper in the usual sense of peer-reviewed publications. ArXiv is meant as a preprint server where you upload preprint versions (essentially polished draft versions) to quickly disseminate your research, before submitting it to a scholarly journal where the paper undergoes peer review. Only after the paper has been peer-reviewed and published by the journal do you have a "real" publication. (Depending on your agreement with the journal, it's then possible to update the arXiv listing to reflect revisions made to the manuscript during the publication process.)
It's still appropriate to list such preprints on your CV - especially early on in a career, when you might have few peer-reviewed publications. This is fine as long as it's made clear that these are preprints, or manuscripts under review or similar.
answered Aug 25 at 13:23
Anyon
2,66011626
No, it's not considered a published paper in the usual sense of peer-reviewed publications. ArXiv is meant as a preprint server where you upload preprint versions (essentially polished draft versions) to quickly disseminate your research, before submitting it to a scholarly journal where the paper undergoes peer review. Only after the paper has been peer-reviewed and published by the journal do you have a "real" publication. (Depending on your agreement with the journal, it's then possible to update the arXiv listing to reflect revisions made to the manuscript during the publication process.)
It's still appropriate to list such preprints on your CV - especially early on in a career, when you might have few peer-reviewed publications. This is fine as long as it's made clear that these are preprints, or manuscripts under review or similar.
answered Aug 25 at 13:23
Anyon
2,66011626
answered Aug 25 at 13:23
Anyon
2,66011626
answered Aug 25 at 13:23
Anyon
2,66011626
answered Aug 25 at 13:23
Anyon
2,66011626
2,66011626
2
This. It goes on you "List of Publications", but you don't refer to the paper as "published".
– dmckee
Aug 25 at 15:33
add a comment |Â
2
This. It goes on you "List of Publications", but you don't refer to the paper as "published".
– dmckee
Aug 25 at 15:33
2
2
This. It goes on you "List of Publications", but you don't refer to the paper as "published".
– dmckee
Aug 25 at 15:33
This. It goes on you "List of Publications", but you don't refer to the paper as "published".
– dmckee
Aug 25 at 15:33
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
I would say it does count as a publication if you need to reference it in your own work/papers. So if you publish a result you can reference this ArXiV paper.
However, it does not count as a peer-review publication in the sense that it does not "add" points/credit to your cv.
answered Aug 25 at 14:54
Dilworth
3,6351219
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
I would say it does count as a publication if you need to reference it in your own work/papers. So if you publish a result you can reference this ArXiV paper.
However, it does not count as a peer-review publication in the sense that it does not "add" points/credit to your cv.
answered Aug 25 at 14:54
Dilworth
3,6351219
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
I would say it does count as a publication if you need to reference it in your own work/papers. So if you publish a result you can reference this ArXiV paper.
However, it does not count as a peer-review publication in the sense that it does not "add" points/credit to your cv.
answered Aug 25 at 14:54
Dilworth
3,6351219
I would say it does count as a publication if you need to reference it in your own work/papers. So if you publish a result you can reference this ArXiV paper.
However, it does not count as a peer-review publication in the sense that it does not "add" points/credit to your cv.
answered Aug 25 at 14:54
Dilworth
3,6351219
answered Aug 25 at 14:54
Dilworth
3,6351219
answered Aug 25 at 14:54
Dilworth
3,6351219
answered Aug 25 at 14:54
Dilworth
3,6351219
3,6351219
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
3
Someone already gave an answer, but let me mention something. When you put something on arXiv, they will never remove it (unless in some exceptional circumstances such as copyright infringement, or if you upload something which is a not a research paper at all). If your paper has such issues that it has been rejected twice, you may want to be careful before making it public.
– Najib Idrissi
Aug 25 at 13:42
@NajibIdrissi then should i just let it and take it to bookshelf for ever? Is there any place to put "a rejected paper" or a place to collect a bunch of rejected paper?
– Ab Rohi
Aug 25 at 14:08
1
Not an answer to your question, but if the paper has been rejected twice you need to know why before you decide if you want to make it part of a permanent public archive. If you have not gotten useful feedback from the journals then you probably want to find your own reviewer—a person with solid domain knowledge who and experience in writing published papers but not affiliated with the work who would be willing to read it and give you an honest enumeration of it's weaknesses.
– dmckee
Aug 25 at 15:36