Best practice for BibTeX entries with paper number rather than page number
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
When conference proceedings or journals are published online and papers are not given page numbers but paper numbers, what is the standard way to incorporate this information into a BibTeX entry? I often see it incorporated under the optional field pages, but many bibliography styles render this as 'p. N' which gives the impression it is a one page paper (or the author failed to clean up the references). I could of course use note=24
, which will be visually correct. I am not asking how to produce the desired visual effect, but what is the canonical approach to storing the information for optimal reuse.
Example BibTeX entry:
@inproceedingsyu2007may,
title=How May E-Learning Groups Interact?,
author=Yu, Chia-Ping and Kuo, Feng-Yang,
booktitle=AMCIS 2007 Proceedings,
pages=24,
year=2007
Recommended citation style:
Yu, Chia-Ping and Kuo, Feng-Yang, "How May E-Learning Groups Interact?" (2007). AMCIS 2007 Proceedings. 24.
Actual format of citation, using bibliography style IEEEtran:
C.-P. Yu and F.-Y. Kuo, "How may E-learning groups interact?," in AMCIS 2007 Proceedings, 2007, p. 24.
Format of the citation with note=24
instead of page=24
, in IEEEtrans:
C.-P. Yu and F.-Y. Kuo, "How may E-learning groups interact?," in AMCIS 2007 Proceedings, 2007, 24.
bibtex
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
When conference proceedings or journals are published online and papers are not given page numbers but paper numbers, what is the standard way to incorporate this information into a BibTeX entry? I often see it incorporated under the optional field pages, but many bibliography styles render this as 'p. N' which gives the impression it is a one page paper (or the author failed to clean up the references). I could of course use note=24
, which will be visually correct. I am not asking how to produce the desired visual effect, but what is the canonical approach to storing the information for optimal reuse.
Example BibTeX entry:
@inproceedingsyu2007may,
title=How May E-Learning Groups Interact?,
author=Yu, Chia-Ping and Kuo, Feng-Yang,
booktitle=AMCIS 2007 Proceedings,
pages=24,
year=2007
Recommended citation style:
Yu, Chia-Ping and Kuo, Feng-Yang, "How May E-Learning Groups Interact?" (2007). AMCIS 2007 Proceedings. 24.
Actual format of citation, using bibliography style IEEEtran:
C.-P. Yu and F.-Y. Kuo, "How may E-learning groups interact?," in AMCIS 2007 Proceedings, 2007, p. 24.
Format of the citation with note=24
instead of page=24
, in IEEEtrans:
C.-P. Yu and F.-Y. Kuo, "How may E-learning groups interact?," in AMCIS 2007 Proceedings, 2007, 24.
bibtex
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
When conference proceedings or journals are published online and papers are not given page numbers but paper numbers, what is the standard way to incorporate this information into a BibTeX entry? I often see it incorporated under the optional field pages, but many bibliography styles render this as 'p. N' which gives the impression it is a one page paper (or the author failed to clean up the references). I could of course use note=24
, which will be visually correct. I am not asking how to produce the desired visual effect, but what is the canonical approach to storing the information for optimal reuse.
Example BibTeX entry:
@inproceedingsyu2007may,
title=How May E-Learning Groups Interact?,
author=Yu, Chia-Ping and Kuo, Feng-Yang,
booktitle=AMCIS 2007 Proceedings,
pages=24,
year=2007
Recommended citation style:
Yu, Chia-Ping and Kuo, Feng-Yang, "How May E-Learning Groups Interact?" (2007). AMCIS 2007 Proceedings. 24.
Actual format of citation, using bibliography style IEEEtran:
C.-P. Yu and F.-Y. Kuo, "How may E-learning groups interact?," in AMCIS 2007 Proceedings, 2007, p. 24.
Format of the citation with note=24
instead of page=24
, in IEEEtrans:
C.-P. Yu and F.-Y. Kuo, "How may E-learning groups interact?," in AMCIS 2007 Proceedings, 2007, 24.
bibtex
When conference proceedings or journals are published online and papers are not given page numbers but paper numbers, what is the standard way to incorporate this information into a BibTeX entry? I often see it incorporated under the optional field pages, but many bibliography styles render this as 'p. N' which gives the impression it is a one page paper (or the author failed to clean up the references). I could of course use note=24
, which will be visually correct. I am not asking how to produce the desired visual effect, but what is the canonical approach to storing the information for optimal reuse.
Example BibTeX entry:
@inproceedingsyu2007may,
title=How May E-Learning Groups Interact?,
author=Yu, Chia-Ping and Kuo, Feng-Yang,
booktitle=AMCIS 2007 Proceedings,
pages=24,
year=2007
Recommended citation style:
Yu, Chia-Ping and Kuo, Feng-Yang, "How May E-Learning Groups Interact?" (2007). AMCIS 2007 Proceedings. 24.
Actual format of citation, using bibliography style IEEEtran:
C.-P. Yu and F.-Y. Kuo, "How may E-learning groups interact?," in AMCIS 2007 Proceedings, 2007, p. 24.
Format of the citation with note=24
instead of page=24
, in IEEEtrans:
C.-P. Yu and F.-Y. Kuo, "How may E-learning groups interact?," in AMCIS 2007 Proceedings, 2007, 24.
bibtex
edited Aug 13 at 14:11
asked Aug 13 at 14:04
Ann
1068
1068
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
Unfortunately, there is no canonical solution here. The base BibTeX styles were written back in the late eighties when URLs and electronic journal publishing were not really a thing and journal articles and conference proceedings mostly had page numbers, so there was no need to mark up "article numbers" or "paper numbers".
Since the core styles have no provision for this, many contributed styles also don't — and if they have something, they roll their own solution; there is no standard that would encompass more styles than that of a family or of the same author.
biblatex
knows the eid
field, but only for @article
and even there I can't promise that all styles make use of it as intended.
You will have to decide if the output looks OK on a case-by-case basis, I'm afraid.
As it so happens, you mention IEEEtran
which has a paper
field for @inproceedings
that can be used here. That field is by no means universal and I have not seen it before, but it should hopefully give the expected output here.
I was afraid that would be the answer, but I was hoping that practitioners had reached a common solution even if the format doesn't support it. I will maintain it asnote
in my master BibTeX file and tweak it as necessary per paper, although it will pain me almost as much as hardcoding author names when no appropriatecite
style is supplied.
– Ann
Aug 13 at 16:02
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
The IEEEtran style provides exactly a "paper" field for this purpose, see the documentation IEEEtran_bst_HOWTO.
@InProceedingsyu2007may,
title = How May E-Learning Groups Interact?,
author = Yu, Chia-Ping and Kuo, Feng-Yang,
booktitle = AMCIS 2007 Proceedings,
paper = 24,
year = 2007
in tmp.bib
produces
documentclassarticle
begindocument
nocite*
bibliographystyleIEEEtran
bibliographyIEEEabrv,tmp
enddocument
Thank you for this suggestion. I appreciate the tip for the IEEEtran style. However, I am not looking for a style-specific formatting technique, but advice on the best approach to maintaining clean BibTeX files.
– Ann
Aug 13 at 16:06
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
Unfortunately, there is no canonical solution here. The base BibTeX styles were written back in the late eighties when URLs and electronic journal publishing were not really a thing and journal articles and conference proceedings mostly had page numbers, so there was no need to mark up "article numbers" or "paper numbers".
Since the core styles have no provision for this, many contributed styles also don't — and if they have something, they roll their own solution; there is no standard that would encompass more styles than that of a family or of the same author.
biblatex
knows the eid
field, but only for @article
and even there I can't promise that all styles make use of it as intended.
You will have to decide if the output looks OK on a case-by-case basis, I'm afraid.
As it so happens, you mention IEEEtran
which has a paper
field for @inproceedings
that can be used here. That field is by no means universal and I have not seen it before, but it should hopefully give the expected output here.
I was afraid that would be the answer, but I was hoping that practitioners had reached a common solution even if the format doesn't support it. I will maintain it asnote
in my master BibTeX file and tweak it as necessary per paper, although it will pain me almost as much as hardcoding author names when no appropriatecite
style is supplied.
– Ann
Aug 13 at 16:02
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
Unfortunately, there is no canonical solution here. The base BibTeX styles were written back in the late eighties when URLs and electronic journal publishing were not really a thing and journal articles and conference proceedings mostly had page numbers, so there was no need to mark up "article numbers" or "paper numbers".
Since the core styles have no provision for this, many contributed styles also don't — and if they have something, they roll their own solution; there is no standard that would encompass more styles than that of a family or of the same author.
biblatex
knows the eid
field, but only for @article
and even there I can't promise that all styles make use of it as intended.
You will have to decide if the output looks OK on a case-by-case basis, I'm afraid.
As it so happens, you mention IEEEtran
which has a paper
field for @inproceedings
that can be used here. That field is by no means universal and I have not seen it before, but it should hopefully give the expected output here.
I was afraid that would be the answer, but I was hoping that practitioners had reached a common solution even if the format doesn't support it. I will maintain it asnote
in my master BibTeX file and tweak it as necessary per paper, although it will pain me almost as much as hardcoding author names when no appropriatecite
style is supplied.
– Ann
Aug 13 at 16:02
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
Unfortunately, there is no canonical solution here. The base BibTeX styles were written back in the late eighties when URLs and electronic journal publishing were not really a thing and journal articles and conference proceedings mostly had page numbers, so there was no need to mark up "article numbers" or "paper numbers".
Since the core styles have no provision for this, many contributed styles also don't — and if they have something, they roll their own solution; there is no standard that would encompass more styles than that of a family or of the same author.
biblatex
knows the eid
field, but only for @article
and even there I can't promise that all styles make use of it as intended.
You will have to decide if the output looks OK on a case-by-case basis, I'm afraid.
As it so happens, you mention IEEEtran
which has a paper
field for @inproceedings
that can be used here. That field is by no means universal and I have not seen it before, but it should hopefully give the expected output here.
Unfortunately, there is no canonical solution here. The base BibTeX styles were written back in the late eighties when URLs and electronic journal publishing were not really a thing and journal articles and conference proceedings mostly had page numbers, so there was no need to mark up "article numbers" or "paper numbers".
Since the core styles have no provision for this, many contributed styles also don't — and if they have something, they roll their own solution; there is no standard that would encompass more styles than that of a family or of the same author.
biblatex
knows the eid
field, but only for @article
and even there I can't promise that all styles make use of it as intended.
You will have to decide if the output looks OK on a case-by-case basis, I'm afraid.
As it so happens, you mention IEEEtran
which has a paper
field for @inproceedings
that can be used here. That field is by no means universal and I have not seen it before, but it should hopefully give the expected output here.
edited Aug 13 at 16:43
TRiG
18611
18611
answered Aug 13 at 14:42
moewe
74.8k797285
74.8k797285
I was afraid that would be the answer, but I was hoping that practitioners had reached a common solution even if the format doesn't support it. I will maintain it asnote
in my master BibTeX file and tweak it as necessary per paper, although it will pain me almost as much as hardcoding author names when no appropriatecite
style is supplied.
– Ann
Aug 13 at 16:02
add a comment |Â
I was afraid that would be the answer, but I was hoping that practitioners had reached a common solution even if the format doesn't support it. I will maintain it asnote
in my master BibTeX file and tweak it as necessary per paper, although it will pain me almost as much as hardcoding author names when no appropriatecite
style is supplied.
– Ann
Aug 13 at 16:02
I was afraid that would be the answer, but I was hoping that practitioners had reached a common solution even if the format doesn't support it. I will maintain it as
note
in my master BibTeX file and tweak it as necessary per paper, although it will pain me almost as much as hardcoding author names when no appropriate cite
style is supplied.– Ann
Aug 13 at 16:02
I was afraid that would be the answer, but I was hoping that practitioners had reached a common solution even if the format doesn't support it. I will maintain it as
note
in my master BibTeX file and tweak it as necessary per paper, although it will pain me almost as much as hardcoding author names when no appropriate cite
style is supplied.– Ann
Aug 13 at 16:02
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
The IEEEtran style provides exactly a "paper" field for this purpose, see the documentation IEEEtran_bst_HOWTO.
@InProceedingsyu2007may,
title = How May E-Learning Groups Interact?,
author = Yu, Chia-Ping and Kuo, Feng-Yang,
booktitle = AMCIS 2007 Proceedings,
paper = 24,
year = 2007
in tmp.bib
produces
documentclassarticle
begindocument
nocite*
bibliographystyleIEEEtran
bibliographyIEEEabrv,tmp
enddocument
Thank you for this suggestion. I appreciate the tip for the IEEEtran style. However, I am not looking for a style-specific formatting technique, but advice on the best approach to maintaining clean BibTeX files.
– Ann
Aug 13 at 16:06
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
The IEEEtran style provides exactly a "paper" field for this purpose, see the documentation IEEEtran_bst_HOWTO.
@InProceedingsyu2007may,
title = How May E-Learning Groups Interact?,
author = Yu, Chia-Ping and Kuo, Feng-Yang,
booktitle = AMCIS 2007 Proceedings,
paper = 24,
year = 2007
in tmp.bib
produces
documentclassarticle
begindocument
nocite*
bibliographystyleIEEEtran
bibliographyIEEEabrv,tmp
enddocument
Thank you for this suggestion. I appreciate the tip for the IEEEtran style. However, I am not looking for a style-specific formatting technique, but advice on the best approach to maintaining clean BibTeX files.
– Ann
Aug 13 at 16:06
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
The IEEEtran style provides exactly a "paper" field for this purpose, see the documentation IEEEtran_bst_HOWTO.
@InProceedingsyu2007may,
title = How May E-Learning Groups Interact?,
author = Yu, Chia-Ping and Kuo, Feng-Yang,
booktitle = AMCIS 2007 Proceedings,
paper = 24,
year = 2007
in tmp.bib
produces
documentclassarticle
begindocument
nocite*
bibliographystyleIEEEtran
bibliographyIEEEabrv,tmp
enddocument
The IEEEtran style provides exactly a "paper" field for this purpose, see the documentation IEEEtran_bst_HOWTO.
@InProceedingsyu2007may,
title = How May E-Learning Groups Interact?,
author = Yu, Chia-Ping and Kuo, Feng-Yang,
booktitle = AMCIS 2007 Proceedings,
paper = 24,
year = 2007
in tmp.bib
produces
documentclassarticle
begindocument
nocite*
bibliographystyleIEEEtran
bibliographyIEEEabrv,tmp
enddocument
answered Aug 13 at 14:51


Andrew Swann
74.6k9123313
74.6k9123313
Thank you for this suggestion. I appreciate the tip for the IEEEtran style. However, I am not looking for a style-specific formatting technique, but advice on the best approach to maintaining clean BibTeX files.
– Ann
Aug 13 at 16:06
add a comment |Â
Thank you for this suggestion. I appreciate the tip for the IEEEtran style. However, I am not looking for a style-specific formatting technique, but advice on the best approach to maintaining clean BibTeX files.
– Ann
Aug 13 at 16:06
Thank you for this suggestion. I appreciate the tip for the IEEEtran style. However, I am not looking for a style-specific formatting technique, but advice on the best approach to maintaining clean BibTeX files.
– Ann
Aug 13 at 16:06
Thank you for this suggestion. I appreciate the tip for the IEEEtran style. However, I am not looking for a style-specific formatting technique, but advice on the best approach to maintaining clean BibTeX files.
– Ann
Aug 13 at 16:06
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f445888%2fbest-practice-for-bibtex-entries-with-paper-number-rather-than-page-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password