Mixing
Does Right to Represent mean if the person clears interview , he is bound to the staffing company?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
Does "Right to Represent" mean if the person clears interview, he is bound to the staffing company? Or is it only for representation to the interview and not related to whether or not the person is offered the job in future?
interviewing
edited Aug 14 at 6:55
Ben Mz
3,0731522
asked Aug 14 at 5:15
H H J
11
 |Â
show 3 more comments
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
Does "Right to Represent" mean if the person clears interview, he is bound to the staffing company? Or is it only for representation to the interview and not related to whether or not the person is offered the job in future?
interviewing
edited Aug 14 at 6:55
Ben Mz
3,0731522
asked Aug 14 at 5:15
H H J
11
3
Which country? And did you sign anything?
– solarflare
Aug 14 at 5:22
2
It sounds like you are thinking of using a recruiter to land you an interview and then skipping out on them. Is that the case? Doe sit sound like a decent thing to do?
– Mawg
Aug 14 at 8:42
2
@Mawg It could also be about someone who is worried that a recruiter's terms may be overly restrictive in what they can do ... I don't think there's enough detail to decide.
– TripeHound
Aug 14 at 11:18
It could well be. And, yes, the OP hasn't said (+1). Maybe he should read How to Ask. If that is the case, I would give up both the recruiter and the job, and look elsewhere
– Mawg
Aug 14 at 11:42
@Mawg I don't understand what it is about this question that makes you think the OP has malicious intent. It sounds like they want to know which entity they'll actually work for if they get the job, which seems reasonable, though a) they should make that clearer and b) seems like they should ask the staffing company.
– BSMP
Aug 14 at 13:41
 |Â
show 3 more comments
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
Does "Right to Represent" mean if the person clears interview, he is bound to the staffing company? Or is it only for representation to the interview and not related to whether or not the person is offered the job in future?
interviewing
edited Aug 14 at 6:55
Ben Mz
3,0731522
asked Aug 14 at 5:15
H H J
11
Does "Right to Represent" mean if the person clears interview, he is bound to the staffing company? Or is it only for representation to the interview and not related to whether or not the person is offered the job in future?
interviewing
edited Aug 14 at 6:55
Ben Mz
3,0731522
asked Aug 14 at 5:15
H H J
11
edited Aug 14 at 6:55
Ben Mz
3,0731522
edited Aug 14 at 6:55
Ben Mz
3,0731522
edited Aug 14 at 6:55
Ben Mz
3,0731522
3,0731522
asked Aug 14 at 5:15
H H J
11
asked Aug 14 at 5:15
H H J
11
asked Aug 14 at 5:15
H H J
11
11
3
Which country? And did you sign anything?
– solarflare
Aug 14 at 5:22
2
It sounds like you are thinking of using a recruiter to land you an interview and then skipping out on them. Is that the case? Doe sit sound like a decent thing to do?
– Mawg
Aug 14 at 8:42
2
@Mawg It could also be about someone who is worried that a recruiter's terms may be overly restrictive in what they can do ... I don't think there's enough detail to decide.
– TripeHound
Aug 14 at 11:18
It could well be. And, yes, the OP hasn't said (+1). Maybe he should read How to Ask. If that is the case, I would give up both the recruiter and the job, and look elsewhere
– Mawg
Aug 14 at 11:42
@Mawg I don't understand what it is about this question that makes you think the OP has malicious intent. It sounds like they want to know which entity they'll actually work for if they get the job, which seems reasonable, though a) they should make that clearer and b) seems like they should ask the staffing company.
– BSMP
Aug 14 at 13:41
 |Â
show 3 more comments
3
Which country? And did you sign anything?
– solarflare
Aug 14 at 5:22
2
It sounds like you are thinking of using a recruiter to land you an interview and then skipping out on them. Is that the case? Doe sit sound like a decent thing to do?
– Mawg
Aug 14 at 8:42
2
@Mawg It could also be about someone who is worried that a recruiter's terms may be overly restrictive in what they can do ... I don't think there's enough detail to decide.
– TripeHound
Aug 14 at 11:18
It could well be. And, yes, the OP hasn't said (+1). Maybe he should read How to Ask. If that is the case, I would give up both the recruiter and the job, and look elsewhere
– Mawg
Aug 14 at 11:42
@Mawg I don't understand what it is about this question that makes you think the OP has malicious intent. It sounds like they want to know which entity they'll actually work for if they get the job, which seems reasonable, though a) they should make that clearer and b) seems like they should ask the staffing company.
– BSMP
Aug 14 at 13:41
3
3
Which country? And did you sign anything?
– solarflare
Aug 14 at 5:22
Which country? And did you sign anything?
– solarflare
Aug 14 at 5:22
2
2
It sounds like you are thinking of using a recruiter to land you an interview and then skipping out on them. Is that the case? Doe sit sound like a decent thing to do?
– Mawg
Aug 14 at 8:42
It sounds like you are thinking of using a recruiter to land you an interview and then skipping out on them. Is that the case? Doe sit sound like a decent thing to do?
– Mawg
Aug 14 at 8:42
2
2
@Mawg It could also be about someone who is worried that a recruiter's terms may be overly restrictive in what they can do ... I don't think there's enough detail to decide.
– TripeHound
Aug 14 at 11:18
@Mawg It could also be about someone who is worried that a recruiter's terms may be overly restrictive in what they can do ... I don't think there's enough detail to decide.
– TripeHound
Aug 14 at 11:18
It could well be. And, yes, the OP hasn't said (+1). Maybe he should read How to Ask. If that is the case, I would give up both the recruiter and the job, and look elsewhere
– Mawg
Aug 14 at 11:42
It could well be. And, yes, the OP hasn't said (+1). Maybe he should read How to Ask. If that is the case, I would give up both the recruiter and the job, and look elsewhere
– Mawg
Aug 14 at 11:42
@Mawg I don't understand what it is about this question that makes you think the OP has malicious intent. It sounds like they want to know which entity they'll actually work for if they get the job, which seems reasonable, though a) they should make that clearer and b) seems like they should ask the staffing company.
– BSMP
Aug 14 at 13:41
@Mawg I don't understand what it is about this question that makes you think the OP has malicious intent. It sounds like they want to know which entity they'll actually work for if they get the job, which seems reasonable, though a) they should make that clearer and b) seems like they should ask the staffing company.
– BSMP
Aug 14 at 13:41
 |Â
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
Does "Right to Represent" mean if the person clears interview, he is
bound to the staffing company? Or is it only for representation to the
interview and not related to whether or not the person is offered the
job in future?
The "Right to Represent" gives the recruiter the exclusive right to represent you to this company for this job and for the duration agreed to in the document.
The representation goes through the interview to the job offer and acceptance.
You should not attempt to skip out on your commitment given by signing this document. Doing so would certainly ruin your relationship with the recruiter and recruiting company, but could also ruin your relationship with the potential employer. Going back on your word is seldom a good career move.
If you have any hesitation about signing a Right to Represent document, you should not sign it and should move on to another job opportunity/recruiter.
answered Aug 14 at 11:26
Joe Strazzere
224k107662931
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
Does "Right to Represent" mean if the person clears interview, he is
bound to the staffing company? Or is it only for representation to the
interview and not related to whether or not the person is offered the
job in future?
The "Right to Represent" gives the recruiter the exclusive right to represent you to this company for this job and for the duration agreed to in the document.
The representation goes through the interview to the job offer and acceptance.
You should not attempt to skip out on your commitment given by signing this document. Doing so would certainly ruin your relationship with the recruiter and recruiting company, but could also ruin your relationship with the potential employer. Going back on your word is seldom a good career move.
If you have any hesitation about signing a Right to Represent document, you should not sign it and should move on to another job opportunity/recruiter.
answered Aug 14 at 11:26
Joe Strazzere
224k107662931
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
Does "Right to Represent" mean if the person clears interview, he is
bound to the staffing company? Or is it only for representation to the
interview and not related to whether or not the person is offered the
job in future?
The "Right to Represent" gives the recruiter the exclusive right to represent you to this company for this job and for the duration agreed to in the document.
The representation goes through the interview to the job offer and acceptance.
You should not attempt to skip out on your commitment given by signing this document. Doing so would certainly ruin your relationship with the recruiter and recruiting company, but could also ruin your relationship with the potential employer. Going back on your word is seldom a good career move.
If you have any hesitation about signing a Right to Represent document, you should not sign it and should move on to another job opportunity/recruiter.
answered Aug 14 at 11:26
Joe Strazzere
224k107662931
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
Does "Right to Represent" mean if the person clears interview, he is
bound to the staffing company? Or is it only for representation to the
interview and not related to whether or not the person is offered the
job in future?
The "Right to Represent" gives the recruiter the exclusive right to represent you to this company for this job and for the duration agreed to in the document.
The representation goes through the interview to the job offer and acceptance.
You should not attempt to skip out on your commitment given by signing this document. Doing so would certainly ruin your relationship with the recruiter and recruiting company, but could also ruin your relationship with the potential employer. Going back on your word is seldom a good career move.
If you have any hesitation about signing a Right to Represent document, you should not sign it and should move on to another job opportunity/recruiter.
answered Aug 14 at 11:26
Joe Strazzere
224k107662931
Does "Right to Represent" mean if the person clears interview, he is
bound to the staffing company? Or is it only for representation to the
interview and not related to whether or not the person is offered the
job in future?
The "Right to Represent" gives the recruiter the exclusive right to represent you to this company for this job and for the duration agreed to in the document.
The representation goes through the interview to the job offer and acceptance.
You should not attempt to skip out on your commitment given by signing this document. Doing so would certainly ruin your relationship with the recruiter and recruiting company, but could also ruin your relationship with the potential employer. Going back on your word is seldom a good career move.
If you have any hesitation about signing a Right to Represent document, you should not sign it and should move on to another job opportunity/recruiter.
answered Aug 14 at 11:26
Joe Strazzere
224k107662931
edited Aug 14 at 11:31
answered Aug 14 at 11:26
Joe Strazzere
224k107662931
answered Aug 14 at 11:26
Joe Strazzere
224k107662931
answered Aug 14 at 11:26
Joe Strazzere
224k107662931
224k107662931
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117556%2fdoes-right-to-represent-mean-if-the-person-clears-interview-he-is-bound-to-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
3
Which country? And did you sign anything?
– solarflare
Aug 14 at 5:22
2
It sounds like you are thinking of using a recruiter to land you an interview and then skipping out on them. Is that the case? Doe sit sound like a decent thing to do?
– Mawg
Aug 14 at 8:42
2
@Mawg It could also be about someone who is worried that a recruiter's terms may be overly restrictive in what they can do ... I don't think there's enough detail to decide.
– TripeHound
Aug 14 at 11:18
It could well be. And, yes, the OP hasn't said (+1). Maybe he should read How to Ask. If that is the case, I would give up both the recruiter and the job, and look elsewhere
– Mawg
Aug 14 at 11:42
@Mawg I don't understand what it is about this question that makes you think the OP has malicious intent. It sounds like they want to know which entity they'll actually work for if they get the job, which seems reasonable, though a) they should make that clearer and b) seems like they should ask the staffing company.
– BSMP
Aug 14 at 13:41