Name of effect on a company when the head changes [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I understand when a large company changes the head boss, it creates a ripple effect of changes through the entire company.



This is due to, the people directly under the new head boss will change how they work to meet different expectations compared to the previous boss.



This would have an effect on the expectations of those under them, and those under them, and so on.



What is this effect called? Or does it even have a name?







share|improve this question














closed as off-topic by Rhys, Monica Cellio♦, CMW, jcmeloni, Elysian Fields♦ Apr 3 '14 at 19:42



  • This question does not appear to be about the workplace within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 2




    I think it's called "change."
    – Blrfl
    Mar 20 '14 at 12:48










  • @Blrfl I'd have called it "restructuring" - even if there are no firings/hirings.. The work and expectations are being restructured.
    – Ahrotahntee
    Mar 20 '14 at 13:11







  • 1




    This question might be better suited for the English SE. They do lots of "What's the word for..." questions.
    – David K
    Mar 20 '14 at 14:21






  • 2




    A recent management change at our company has often been described as a "Sh!t storm" however I believe restructuring may be a more politically correct way of referring to it.
    – Dopeybob435
    Mar 27 '14 at 18:08






  • 3




    This question appears to be off-topic because it is a language question not specific to the workplace. Consider migrating to EL&U.
    – Monica Cellio♦
    Apr 2 '14 at 16:28
















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I understand when a large company changes the head boss, it creates a ripple effect of changes through the entire company.



This is due to, the people directly under the new head boss will change how they work to meet different expectations compared to the previous boss.



This would have an effect on the expectations of those under them, and those under them, and so on.



What is this effect called? Or does it even have a name?







share|improve this question














closed as off-topic by Rhys, Monica Cellio♦, CMW, jcmeloni, Elysian Fields♦ Apr 3 '14 at 19:42



  • This question does not appear to be about the workplace within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 2




    I think it's called "change."
    – Blrfl
    Mar 20 '14 at 12:48










  • @Blrfl I'd have called it "restructuring" - even if there are no firings/hirings.. The work and expectations are being restructured.
    – Ahrotahntee
    Mar 20 '14 at 13:11







  • 1




    This question might be better suited for the English SE. They do lots of "What's the word for..." questions.
    – David K
    Mar 20 '14 at 14:21






  • 2




    A recent management change at our company has often been described as a "Sh!t storm" however I believe restructuring may be a more politically correct way of referring to it.
    – Dopeybob435
    Mar 27 '14 at 18:08






  • 3




    This question appears to be off-topic because it is a language question not specific to the workplace. Consider migrating to EL&U.
    – Monica Cellio♦
    Apr 2 '14 at 16:28












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I understand when a large company changes the head boss, it creates a ripple effect of changes through the entire company.



This is due to, the people directly under the new head boss will change how they work to meet different expectations compared to the previous boss.



This would have an effect on the expectations of those under them, and those under them, and so on.



What is this effect called? Or does it even have a name?







share|improve this question














I understand when a large company changes the head boss, it creates a ripple effect of changes through the entire company.



This is due to, the people directly under the new head boss will change how they work to meet different expectations compared to the previous boss.



This would have an effect on the expectations of those under them, and those under them, and so on.



What is this effect called? Or does it even have a name?









share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 5 '14 at 21:08









Rhys

5,73623558




5,73623558










asked Mar 20 '14 at 12:29









AaronParkes

7727




7727




closed as off-topic by Rhys, Monica Cellio♦, CMW, jcmeloni, Elysian Fields♦ Apr 3 '14 at 19:42



  • This question does not appear to be about the workplace within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by Rhys, Monica Cellio♦, CMW, jcmeloni, Elysian Fields♦ Apr 3 '14 at 19:42



  • This question does not appear to be about the workplace within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







  • 2




    I think it's called "change."
    – Blrfl
    Mar 20 '14 at 12:48










  • @Blrfl I'd have called it "restructuring" - even if there are no firings/hirings.. The work and expectations are being restructured.
    – Ahrotahntee
    Mar 20 '14 at 13:11







  • 1




    This question might be better suited for the English SE. They do lots of "What's the word for..." questions.
    – David K
    Mar 20 '14 at 14:21






  • 2




    A recent management change at our company has often been described as a "Sh!t storm" however I believe restructuring may be a more politically correct way of referring to it.
    – Dopeybob435
    Mar 27 '14 at 18:08






  • 3




    This question appears to be off-topic because it is a language question not specific to the workplace. Consider migrating to EL&U.
    – Monica Cellio♦
    Apr 2 '14 at 16:28












  • 2




    I think it's called "change."
    – Blrfl
    Mar 20 '14 at 12:48










  • @Blrfl I'd have called it "restructuring" - even if there are no firings/hirings.. The work and expectations are being restructured.
    – Ahrotahntee
    Mar 20 '14 at 13:11







  • 1




    This question might be better suited for the English SE. They do lots of "What's the word for..." questions.
    – David K
    Mar 20 '14 at 14:21






  • 2




    A recent management change at our company has often been described as a "Sh!t storm" however I believe restructuring may be a more politically correct way of referring to it.
    – Dopeybob435
    Mar 27 '14 at 18:08






  • 3




    This question appears to be off-topic because it is a language question not specific to the workplace. Consider migrating to EL&U.
    – Monica Cellio♦
    Apr 2 '14 at 16:28







2




2




I think it's called "change."
– Blrfl
Mar 20 '14 at 12:48




I think it's called "change."
– Blrfl
Mar 20 '14 at 12:48












@Blrfl I'd have called it "restructuring" - even if there are no firings/hirings.. The work and expectations are being restructured.
– Ahrotahntee
Mar 20 '14 at 13:11





@Blrfl I'd have called it "restructuring" - even if there are no firings/hirings.. The work and expectations are being restructured.
– Ahrotahntee
Mar 20 '14 at 13:11





1




1




This question might be better suited for the English SE. They do lots of "What's the word for..." questions.
– David K
Mar 20 '14 at 14:21




This question might be better suited for the English SE. They do lots of "What's the word for..." questions.
– David K
Mar 20 '14 at 14:21




2




2




A recent management change at our company has often been described as a "Sh!t storm" however I believe restructuring may be a more politically correct way of referring to it.
– Dopeybob435
Mar 27 '14 at 18:08




A recent management change at our company has often been described as a "Sh!t storm" however I believe restructuring may be a more politically correct way of referring to it.
– Dopeybob435
Mar 27 '14 at 18:08




3




3




This question appears to be off-topic because it is a language question not specific to the workplace. Consider migrating to EL&U.
– Monica Cellio♦
Apr 2 '14 at 16:28




This question appears to be off-topic because it is a language question not specific to the workplace. Consider migrating to EL&U.
– Monica Cellio♦
Apr 2 '14 at 16:28










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













Leadership turnover is a nifty phrase. Probably the one I'd use to describe the event.



There's also relationship with authority (what the team has with the boss), and culture shift (what happens if the boss ends up being a big factor for change).



From a planning perspective, doing this with some plan in mind is "succession planning".






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    It's just a matter of corporate leadership turnover. There isn't any one word or phrase for it, but you could call it change in company strategy or goals.



    It's also worth noting that this doesn't always happen when someone new arrives in the C-suite; many times that person's predecessor will handpick them because they know that they will, for the most part, agree with and help manage the same corporate strategy as before.






    share|improve this answer



























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Leadership turnover is a nifty phrase. Probably the one I'd use to describe the event.



      There's also relationship with authority (what the team has with the boss), and culture shift (what happens if the boss ends up being a big factor for change).



      From a planning perspective, doing this with some plan in mind is "succession planning".






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        1
        down vote













        Leadership turnover is a nifty phrase. Probably the one I'd use to describe the event.



        There's also relationship with authority (what the team has with the boss), and culture shift (what happens if the boss ends up being a big factor for change).



        From a planning perspective, doing this with some plan in mind is "succession planning".






        share|improve this answer






















          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          Leadership turnover is a nifty phrase. Probably the one I'd use to describe the event.



          There's also relationship with authority (what the team has with the boss), and culture shift (what happens if the boss ends up being a big factor for change).



          From a planning perspective, doing this with some plan in mind is "succession planning".






          share|improve this answer












          Leadership turnover is a nifty phrase. Probably the one I'd use to describe the event.



          There's also relationship with authority (what the team has with the boss), and culture shift (what happens if the boss ends up being a big factor for change).



          From a planning perspective, doing this with some plan in mind is "succession planning".







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 2 '14 at 4:04









          bethlakshmi

          70.3k4136277




          70.3k4136277






















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              It's just a matter of corporate leadership turnover. There isn't any one word or phrase for it, but you could call it change in company strategy or goals.



              It's also worth noting that this doesn't always happen when someone new arrives in the C-suite; many times that person's predecessor will handpick them because they know that they will, for the most part, agree with and help manage the same corporate strategy as before.






              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                It's just a matter of corporate leadership turnover. There isn't any one word or phrase for it, but you could call it change in company strategy or goals.



                It's also worth noting that this doesn't always happen when someone new arrives in the C-suite; many times that person's predecessor will handpick them because they know that they will, for the most part, agree with and help manage the same corporate strategy as before.






                share|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  It's just a matter of corporate leadership turnover. There isn't any one word or phrase for it, but you could call it change in company strategy or goals.



                  It's also worth noting that this doesn't always happen when someone new arrives in the C-suite; many times that person's predecessor will handpick them because they know that they will, for the most part, agree with and help manage the same corporate strategy as before.






                  share|improve this answer












                  It's just a matter of corporate leadership turnover. There isn't any one word or phrase for it, but you could call it change in company strategy or goals.



                  It's also worth noting that this doesn't always happen when someone new arrives in the C-suite; many times that person's predecessor will handpick them because they know that they will, for the most part, agree with and help manage the same corporate strategy as before.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 20 '14 at 13:06









                  panoptical

                  3,5761538




                  3,5761538












                      Comments

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                      Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

                      Confectionery