Is this an employee confidentiality breach?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












This is from a friend:




Unbeknownst to me, I was granted stock options back in January by my
company but the VP gave the RSU letter to my coworker (not clear on
why) and she's had it for 3 months. I don't go in the office much
(work remotely) but that doesn't seem like a valid excuse for her to
hold onto it and I've seen her multiple times since January. No one
told me about the stock options...not my boss, the coworker, HR, etc.
and I was unaware of the letter until my coworker randomly mentioned
it, also that she read it. Not everyone in the company gets stock so
it's not as if this is some generic form letter. I am really pissed
off but not sure if this is a breach of confidentiality or just plain unprofessional




How should they proceed in this case? contacting HR?







share|improve this question
















  • 2




    Tell your "friend" to talk to the VP and make sure future paperwork is mailed or otherwise held until your friend is in the office.
    – Garrison Neely
    Apr 29 '14 at 18:51










  • How should they proceed in this case? That depends on what they think the outcome should be.
    – Rob Moir
    Apr 29 '14 at 20:09











  • You are asking about an assessment of an action for an evaluation about the application of legal concept and for the next action which could have legal consequences. that makes this off topic
    – IDrinkandIKnowThings
    Apr 29 '14 at 20:13







  • 7




    Because this is part of your compensation, the letter should have been in a sealed envelope (minimum) and marked private.
    – mkennedy
    Apr 29 '14 at 20:48
















up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












This is from a friend:




Unbeknownst to me, I was granted stock options back in January by my
company but the VP gave the RSU letter to my coworker (not clear on
why) and she's had it for 3 months. I don't go in the office much
(work remotely) but that doesn't seem like a valid excuse for her to
hold onto it and I've seen her multiple times since January. No one
told me about the stock options...not my boss, the coworker, HR, etc.
and I was unaware of the letter until my coworker randomly mentioned
it, also that she read it. Not everyone in the company gets stock so
it's not as if this is some generic form letter. I am really pissed
off but not sure if this is a breach of confidentiality or just plain unprofessional




How should they proceed in this case? contacting HR?







share|improve this question
















  • 2




    Tell your "friend" to talk to the VP and make sure future paperwork is mailed or otherwise held until your friend is in the office.
    – Garrison Neely
    Apr 29 '14 at 18:51










  • How should they proceed in this case? That depends on what they think the outcome should be.
    – Rob Moir
    Apr 29 '14 at 20:09











  • You are asking about an assessment of an action for an evaluation about the application of legal concept and for the next action which could have legal consequences. that makes this off topic
    – IDrinkandIKnowThings
    Apr 29 '14 at 20:13







  • 7




    Because this is part of your compensation, the letter should have been in a sealed envelope (minimum) and marked private.
    – mkennedy
    Apr 29 '14 at 20:48












up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1






1





This is from a friend:




Unbeknownst to me, I was granted stock options back in January by my
company but the VP gave the RSU letter to my coworker (not clear on
why) and she's had it for 3 months. I don't go in the office much
(work remotely) but that doesn't seem like a valid excuse for her to
hold onto it and I've seen her multiple times since January. No one
told me about the stock options...not my boss, the coworker, HR, etc.
and I was unaware of the letter until my coworker randomly mentioned
it, also that she read it. Not everyone in the company gets stock so
it's not as if this is some generic form letter. I am really pissed
off but not sure if this is a breach of confidentiality or just plain unprofessional




How should they proceed in this case? contacting HR?







share|improve this question












This is from a friend:




Unbeknownst to me, I was granted stock options back in January by my
company but the VP gave the RSU letter to my coworker (not clear on
why) and she's had it for 3 months. I don't go in the office much
(work remotely) but that doesn't seem like a valid excuse for her to
hold onto it and I've seen her multiple times since January. No one
told me about the stock options...not my boss, the coworker, HR, etc.
and I was unaware of the letter until my coworker randomly mentioned
it, also that she read it. Not everyone in the company gets stock so
it's not as if this is some generic form letter. I am really pissed
off but not sure if this is a breach of confidentiality or just plain unprofessional




How should they proceed in this case? contacting HR?









share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Apr 29 '14 at 18:29









kevzettler

1275




1275







  • 2




    Tell your "friend" to talk to the VP and make sure future paperwork is mailed or otherwise held until your friend is in the office.
    – Garrison Neely
    Apr 29 '14 at 18:51










  • How should they proceed in this case? That depends on what they think the outcome should be.
    – Rob Moir
    Apr 29 '14 at 20:09











  • You are asking about an assessment of an action for an evaluation about the application of legal concept and for the next action which could have legal consequences. that makes this off topic
    – IDrinkandIKnowThings
    Apr 29 '14 at 20:13







  • 7




    Because this is part of your compensation, the letter should have been in a sealed envelope (minimum) and marked private.
    – mkennedy
    Apr 29 '14 at 20:48












  • 2




    Tell your "friend" to talk to the VP and make sure future paperwork is mailed or otherwise held until your friend is in the office.
    – Garrison Neely
    Apr 29 '14 at 18:51










  • How should they proceed in this case? That depends on what they think the outcome should be.
    – Rob Moir
    Apr 29 '14 at 20:09











  • You are asking about an assessment of an action for an evaluation about the application of legal concept and for the next action which could have legal consequences. that makes this off topic
    – IDrinkandIKnowThings
    Apr 29 '14 at 20:13







  • 7




    Because this is part of your compensation, the letter should have been in a sealed envelope (minimum) and marked private.
    – mkennedy
    Apr 29 '14 at 20:48







2




2




Tell your "friend" to talk to the VP and make sure future paperwork is mailed or otherwise held until your friend is in the office.
– Garrison Neely
Apr 29 '14 at 18:51




Tell your "friend" to talk to the VP and make sure future paperwork is mailed or otherwise held until your friend is in the office.
– Garrison Neely
Apr 29 '14 at 18:51












How should they proceed in this case? That depends on what they think the outcome should be.
– Rob Moir
Apr 29 '14 at 20:09





How should they proceed in this case? That depends on what they think the outcome should be.
– Rob Moir
Apr 29 '14 at 20:09













You are asking about an assessment of an action for an evaluation about the application of legal concept and for the next action which could have legal consequences. that makes this off topic
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Apr 29 '14 at 20:13





You are asking about an assessment of an action for an evaluation about the application of legal concept and for the next action which could have legal consequences. that makes this off topic
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Apr 29 '14 at 20:13





7




7




Because this is part of your compensation, the letter should have been in a sealed envelope (minimum) and marked private.
– mkennedy
Apr 29 '14 at 20:48




Because this is part of your compensation, the letter should have been in a sealed envelope (minimum) and marked private.
– mkennedy
Apr 29 '14 at 20:48










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
12
down vote



accepted










This is very strange. I've both granted and received stock options. In every case where I granted them, I considered it vital to have a conversation with the recipient about shared goals, and about shared hopes for the company's success.



In one case where I received options the letter came in an interoffice mail envelope. That company later got bought for four cents on the dollar, after being looted by its executives. Other cases were more successful, and they had conversations.



These letters usually have some place where the recipient signs off on receiving the letter.



I've concluded that the way option grants are issued says a lot about the strength of the executive team of the company. Your friend's company is coming up short in this area.



If I were your friend, I'd take the letter to the VP, thank her for the grant, and ask her what she thinks needs to be done to make the options worth a fortune. In other words, I think your friend should initiate the motivational conversation that the VP should have initiated.



I'd also let the VP know that the letter didn't get to your friend right away.



Two slogans come to mind:



  1. Never assume malevolence where incompetence explains the behavior.

  2. "The entire purpose of ze doomsday maschine is lost if you keep it a secret!" (Dr. Strangelove).





share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    This falls into the "Just plain unprofessional". I am guessing this is a smaller company as communication of options grants are often communicated late and without sufficient commentary. Your friend should definitely provide feedback to HR and/or their manager that communication was lacking and it was a bit weird to have the paperwork given to a co-worker as an intermediary rather than direct.






    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Clearly giving you share options and not telling you about them is quite pointless - the share options are meant as an inspiration to do better work, so the company would want to tell you about them! So this is weird.



      On the other hand, not being told about these share options for three months didn't actually hurt you (unless you acted in some way because you were annoyed about not getting promised share options). Share options take time to vest, so they will turn into money probably in a few years time - doesn't matter when you were told.



      So I'd tell the right people about what happened, but without making a big fuss of it.






      share|improve this answer




















        Your Answer







        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "423"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: false,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        noCode: true, onDemand: false,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );








         

        draft saved


        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f23342%2fis-this-an-employee-confidentiality-breach%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest

























        StackExchange.ready(function ()
        $("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function ()
        var showEditor = function()
        $("#show-editor-button").hide();
        $("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
        StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
        ;

        var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
        if(useFancy == 'True')
        var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
        var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
        var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');

        $(this).loadPopup(
        url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
        loaded: function(popup)
        var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
        var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
        var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');

        pTitle.text(popupTitle);
        pBody.html(popupBody);
        pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);

        )
        else
        var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
        if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true)
        showEditor();


        );
        );






        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        12
        down vote



        accepted










        This is very strange. I've both granted and received stock options. In every case where I granted them, I considered it vital to have a conversation with the recipient about shared goals, and about shared hopes for the company's success.



        In one case where I received options the letter came in an interoffice mail envelope. That company later got bought for four cents on the dollar, after being looted by its executives. Other cases were more successful, and they had conversations.



        These letters usually have some place where the recipient signs off on receiving the letter.



        I've concluded that the way option grants are issued says a lot about the strength of the executive team of the company. Your friend's company is coming up short in this area.



        If I were your friend, I'd take the letter to the VP, thank her for the grant, and ask her what she thinks needs to be done to make the options worth a fortune. In other words, I think your friend should initiate the motivational conversation that the VP should have initiated.



        I'd also let the VP know that the letter didn't get to your friend right away.



        Two slogans come to mind:



        1. Never assume malevolence where incompetence explains the behavior.

        2. "The entire purpose of ze doomsday maschine is lost if you keep it a secret!" (Dr. Strangelove).





        share|improve this answer
























          up vote
          12
          down vote



          accepted










          This is very strange. I've both granted and received stock options. In every case where I granted them, I considered it vital to have a conversation with the recipient about shared goals, and about shared hopes for the company's success.



          In one case where I received options the letter came in an interoffice mail envelope. That company later got bought for four cents on the dollar, after being looted by its executives. Other cases were more successful, and they had conversations.



          These letters usually have some place where the recipient signs off on receiving the letter.



          I've concluded that the way option grants are issued says a lot about the strength of the executive team of the company. Your friend's company is coming up short in this area.



          If I were your friend, I'd take the letter to the VP, thank her for the grant, and ask her what she thinks needs to be done to make the options worth a fortune. In other words, I think your friend should initiate the motivational conversation that the VP should have initiated.



          I'd also let the VP know that the letter didn't get to your friend right away.



          Two slogans come to mind:



          1. Never assume malevolence where incompetence explains the behavior.

          2. "The entire purpose of ze doomsday maschine is lost if you keep it a secret!" (Dr. Strangelove).





          share|improve this answer






















            up vote
            12
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            12
            down vote



            accepted






            This is very strange. I've both granted and received stock options. In every case where I granted them, I considered it vital to have a conversation with the recipient about shared goals, and about shared hopes for the company's success.



            In one case where I received options the letter came in an interoffice mail envelope. That company later got bought for four cents on the dollar, after being looted by its executives. Other cases were more successful, and they had conversations.



            These letters usually have some place where the recipient signs off on receiving the letter.



            I've concluded that the way option grants are issued says a lot about the strength of the executive team of the company. Your friend's company is coming up short in this area.



            If I were your friend, I'd take the letter to the VP, thank her for the grant, and ask her what she thinks needs to be done to make the options worth a fortune. In other words, I think your friend should initiate the motivational conversation that the VP should have initiated.



            I'd also let the VP know that the letter didn't get to your friend right away.



            Two slogans come to mind:



            1. Never assume malevolence where incompetence explains the behavior.

            2. "The entire purpose of ze doomsday maschine is lost if you keep it a secret!" (Dr. Strangelove).





            share|improve this answer












            This is very strange. I've both granted and received stock options. In every case where I granted them, I considered it vital to have a conversation with the recipient about shared goals, and about shared hopes for the company's success.



            In one case where I received options the letter came in an interoffice mail envelope. That company later got bought for four cents on the dollar, after being looted by its executives. Other cases were more successful, and they had conversations.



            These letters usually have some place where the recipient signs off on receiving the letter.



            I've concluded that the way option grants are issued says a lot about the strength of the executive team of the company. Your friend's company is coming up short in this area.



            If I were your friend, I'd take the letter to the VP, thank her for the grant, and ask her what she thinks needs to be done to make the options worth a fortune. In other words, I think your friend should initiate the motivational conversation that the VP should have initiated.



            I'd also let the VP know that the letter didn't get to your friend right away.



            Two slogans come to mind:



            1. Never assume malevolence where incompetence explains the behavior.

            2. "The entire purpose of ze doomsday maschine is lost if you keep it a secret!" (Dr. Strangelove).






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Apr 29 '14 at 21:16









            O. Jones

            13.6k24070




            13.6k24070






















                up vote
                2
                down vote













                This falls into the "Just plain unprofessional". I am guessing this is a smaller company as communication of options grants are often communicated late and without sufficient commentary. Your friend should definitely provide feedback to HR and/or their manager that communication was lacking and it was a bit weird to have the paperwork given to a co-worker as an intermediary rather than direct.






                share|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote













                  This falls into the "Just plain unprofessional". I am guessing this is a smaller company as communication of options grants are often communicated late and without sufficient commentary. Your friend should definitely provide feedback to HR and/or their manager that communication was lacking and it was a bit weird to have the paperwork given to a co-worker as an intermediary rather than direct.






                  share|improve this answer






















                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote









                    This falls into the "Just plain unprofessional". I am guessing this is a smaller company as communication of options grants are often communicated late and without sufficient commentary. Your friend should definitely provide feedback to HR and/or their manager that communication was lacking and it was a bit weird to have the paperwork given to a co-worker as an intermediary rather than direct.






                    share|improve this answer












                    This falls into the "Just plain unprofessional". I am guessing this is a smaller company as communication of options grants are often communicated late and without sufficient commentary. Your friend should definitely provide feedback to HR and/or their manager that communication was lacking and it was a bit weird to have the paperwork given to a co-worker as an intermediary rather than direct.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Apr 29 '14 at 19:57









                    Jack Sinclair

                    781410




                    781410




















                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        Clearly giving you share options and not telling you about them is quite pointless - the share options are meant as an inspiration to do better work, so the company would want to tell you about them! So this is weird.



                        On the other hand, not being told about these share options for three months didn't actually hurt you (unless you acted in some way because you were annoyed about not getting promised share options). Share options take time to vest, so they will turn into money probably in a few years time - doesn't matter when you were told.



                        So I'd tell the right people about what happened, but without making a big fuss of it.






                        share|improve this answer
























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          Clearly giving you share options and not telling you about them is quite pointless - the share options are meant as an inspiration to do better work, so the company would want to tell you about them! So this is weird.



                          On the other hand, not being told about these share options for three months didn't actually hurt you (unless you acted in some way because you were annoyed about not getting promised share options). Share options take time to vest, so they will turn into money probably in a few years time - doesn't matter when you were told.



                          So I'd tell the right people about what happened, but without making a big fuss of it.






                          share|improve this answer






















                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote









                            Clearly giving you share options and not telling you about them is quite pointless - the share options are meant as an inspiration to do better work, so the company would want to tell you about them! So this is weird.



                            On the other hand, not being told about these share options for three months didn't actually hurt you (unless you acted in some way because you were annoyed about not getting promised share options). Share options take time to vest, so they will turn into money probably in a few years time - doesn't matter when you were told.



                            So I'd tell the right people about what happened, but without making a big fuss of it.






                            share|improve this answer












                            Clearly giving you share options and not telling you about them is quite pointless - the share options are meant as an inspiration to do better work, so the company would want to tell you about them! So this is weird.



                            On the other hand, not being told about these share options for three months didn't actually hurt you (unless you acted in some way because you were annoyed about not getting promised share options). Share options take time to vest, so they will turn into money probably in a few years time - doesn't matter when you were told.



                            So I'd tell the right people about what happened, but without making a big fuss of it.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Dec 4 '15 at 22:18









                            gnasher729

                            71.5k31131224




                            71.5k31131224






















                                 

                                draft saved


                                draft discarded


























                                 


                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f23342%2fis-this-an-employee-confidentiality-breach%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest

















































































                                Comments

                                Popular posts from this blog

                                List of Gilmore Girls characters

                                What does second last employer means? [closed]

                                One-line joke