Is it appropriate not to complete a re-assigned task so that your colleague who did not do the work cannot claim credit in his or her resume [closed]
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
-5
down vote
favorite
This colleague that I mention in my scenario (How to handle being assigned a colleague's work when the colleague does not complete it) have decided to leave the company because he/she have manage to find greener grass out there.
So, would it be right that I not complete the task that was re-assigned by my boss and persuade my boss to agree with my action. (so that the colleague will not use the work that is performed by you and list inside his / her resume.)
resume management colleagues stress
closed as primarily opinion-based by Jim G., jcmeloni, Jan Doggen, CincinnatiProgrammer, CMW Jan 14 '14 at 12:47
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
-5
down vote
favorite
This colleague that I mention in my scenario (How to handle being assigned a colleague's work when the colleague does not complete it) have decided to leave the company because he/she have manage to find greener grass out there.
So, would it be right that I not complete the task that was re-assigned by my boss and persuade my boss to agree with my action. (so that the colleague will not use the work that is performed by you and list inside his / her resume.)
resume management colleagues stress
closed as primarily opinion-based by Jim G., jcmeloni, Jan Doggen, CincinnatiProgrammer, CMW Jan 14 '14 at 12:47
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
2
Why do you even care about this?
– Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Jan 14 '14 at 9:49
4
As Ross Drew answered, not just it's inappropriate, but it can be seen as a huge red flag for your boss. You're worrying more about not something that could benefit your ex-colleague than the task that needs to be done by your company. Suppose that this tasks involves finishing a feature for a product that a big client requested. Just because this hapenned, does not mean the feature can be simply cancelled. If you like your job, I highly suggest thinking about it too.
– Hugo Rocha
Jan 14 '14 at 11:58
1
Well personally, I'd fire you if you did that. It is highly unprofessional. You have been assigned the work, just do it.
– HLGEM
Jan 14 '14 at 14:07
4
How on earth would you not finishing the task prevent him from saying whatever he wants to in his resume?
– HLGEM
Jan 14 '14 at 16:24
4
If I was your boss, and you decided not to complete tasks I assigned you because you were afraid your ex-colleague would take credit for them, you'd be following him out the door - although I would be generous enough to express my fervent hope that it did not hit you on the ass on your way out.
– Carson63000
Jan 15 '14 at 2:01
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
-5
down vote
favorite
up vote
-5
down vote
favorite
This colleague that I mention in my scenario (How to handle being assigned a colleague's work when the colleague does not complete it) have decided to leave the company because he/she have manage to find greener grass out there.
So, would it be right that I not complete the task that was re-assigned by my boss and persuade my boss to agree with my action. (so that the colleague will not use the work that is performed by you and list inside his / her resume.)
resume management colleagues stress
This colleague that I mention in my scenario (How to handle being assigned a colleague's work when the colleague does not complete it) have decided to leave the company because he/she have manage to find greener grass out there.
So, would it be right that I not complete the task that was re-assigned by my boss and persuade my boss to agree with my action. (so that the colleague will not use the work that is performed by you and list inside his / her resume.)
resume management colleagues stress
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:48
Community♦
1
1
asked Jan 14 '14 at 9:11
user275517
10715
10715
closed as primarily opinion-based by Jim G., jcmeloni, Jan Doggen, CincinnatiProgrammer, CMW Jan 14 '14 at 12:47
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as primarily opinion-based by Jim G., jcmeloni, Jan Doggen, CincinnatiProgrammer, CMW Jan 14 '14 at 12:47
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
2
Why do you even care about this?
– Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Jan 14 '14 at 9:49
4
As Ross Drew answered, not just it's inappropriate, but it can be seen as a huge red flag for your boss. You're worrying more about not something that could benefit your ex-colleague than the task that needs to be done by your company. Suppose that this tasks involves finishing a feature for a product that a big client requested. Just because this hapenned, does not mean the feature can be simply cancelled. If you like your job, I highly suggest thinking about it too.
– Hugo Rocha
Jan 14 '14 at 11:58
1
Well personally, I'd fire you if you did that. It is highly unprofessional. You have been assigned the work, just do it.
– HLGEM
Jan 14 '14 at 14:07
4
How on earth would you not finishing the task prevent him from saying whatever he wants to in his resume?
– HLGEM
Jan 14 '14 at 16:24
4
If I was your boss, and you decided not to complete tasks I assigned you because you were afraid your ex-colleague would take credit for them, you'd be following him out the door - although I would be generous enough to express my fervent hope that it did not hit you on the ass on your way out.
– Carson63000
Jan 15 '14 at 2:01
 |Â
show 2 more comments
2
Why do you even care about this?
– Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Jan 14 '14 at 9:49
4
As Ross Drew answered, not just it's inappropriate, but it can be seen as a huge red flag for your boss. You're worrying more about not something that could benefit your ex-colleague than the task that needs to be done by your company. Suppose that this tasks involves finishing a feature for a product that a big client requested. Just because this hapenned, does not mean the feature can be simply cancelled. If you like your job, I highly suggest thinking about it too.
– Hugo Rocha
Jan 14 '14 at 11:58
1
Well personally, I'd fire you if you did that. It is highly unprofessional. You have been assigned the work, just do it.
– HLGEM
Jan 14 '14 at 14:07
4
How on earth would you not finishing the task prevent him from saying whatever he wants to in his resume?
– HLGEM
Jan 14 '14 at 16:24
4
If I was your boss, and you decided not to complete tasks I assigned you because you were afraid your ex-colleague would take credit for them, you'd be following him out the door - although I would be generous enough to express my fervent hope that it did not hit you on the ass on your way out.
– Carson63000
Jan 15 '14 at 2:01
2
2
Why do you even care about this?
– Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Jan 14 '14 at 9:49
Why do you even care about this?
– Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Jan 14 '14 at 9:49
4
4
As Ross Drew answered, not just it's inappropriate, but it can be seen as a huge red flag for your boss. You're worrying more about not something that could benefit your ex-colleague than the task that needs to be done by your company. Suppose that this tasks involves finishing a feature for a product that a big client requested. Just because this hapenned, does not mean the feature can be simply cancelled. If you like your job, I highly suggest thinking about it too.
– Hugo Rocha
Jan 14 '14 at 11:58
As Ross Drew answered, not just it's inappropriate, but it can be seen as a huge red flag for your boss. You're worrying more about not something that could benefit your ex-colleague than the task that needs to be done by your company. Suppose that this tasks involves finishing a feature for a product that a big client requested. Just because this hapenned, does not mean the feature can be simply cancelled. If you like your job, I highly suggest thinking about it too.
– Hugo Rocha
Jan 14 '14 at 11:58
1
1
Well personally, I'd fire you if you did that. It is highly unprofessional. You have been assigned the work, just do it.
– HLGEM
Jan 14 '14 at 14:07
Well personally, I'd fire you if you did that. It is highly unprofessional. You have been assigned the work, just do it.
– HLGEM
Jan 14 '14 at 14:07
4
4
How on earth would you not finishing the task prevent him from saying whatever he wants to in his resume?
– HLGEM
Jan 14 '14 at 16:24
How on earth would you not finishing the task prevent him from saying whatever he wants to in his resume?
– HLGEM
Jan 14 '14 at 16:24
4
4
If I was your boss, and you decided not to complete tasks I assigned you because you were afraid your ex-colleague would take credit for them, you'd be following him out the door - although I would be generous enough to express my fervent hope that it did not hit you on the ass on your way out.
– Carson63000
Jan 15 '14 at 2:01
If I was your boss, and you decided not to complete tasks I assigned you because you were afraid your ex-colleague would take credit for them, you'd be following him out the door - although I would be generous enough to express my fervent hope that it did not hit you on the ass on your way out.
– Carson63000
Jan 15 '14 at 2:01
 |Â
show 2 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
10
down vote
I don't see why someone falsely taking credit for your work is any reason for you not to do the work you are paid for. What difference would it make to you or your company if they did take credit? What's to stop him/her taking credit for anything, even things he had nothing to do with? Does it stop you taking credit later? Also, how would you be benefiting you or your company by refusing to do the work?
Playing political games (including handling colleagues when you don't need to, going over your bosses head because you don't like how they handle people and rebelling against work you are given) for rewards based on pride is not going to work in your favor, you're going to be in trouble because you are not doing what you are being paid to do.
So no, I don't think it's appropriate.
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
Your boss couldn't settle with your colleague's poor work and decided to reassign the task to you. That implies that the task is important to your boss - maybe even to the entire company. refusing to complete it would be sacrificing the interest of the employer for the sake of revenge on the colleague - something I doubt your boss would like.
No - it is not appropriate.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
A new employer has no guarantee that anything in a resume is 100% true, embellished, or a downright lie. It may appear unjust that your colleague appears to have got a new job based on falsely claiming credit, but it's up to the new company to verify facts and if they don't, more fool them. Refusing to do your company's work because you're peeved about the situation is petulant - you should be glad that you're rid of the colleague, and you have a chance to prove how much more valuable you are than he was.
And if he doesn't deliver the goods at this new company he will in due course be found out. It's not a trick you can pull repeatedly.
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
10
down vote
I don't see why someone falsely taking credit for your work is any reason for you not to do the work you are paid for. What difference would it make to you or your company if they did take credit? What's to stop him/her taking credit for anything, even things he had nothing to do with? Does it stop you taking credit later? Also, how would you be benefiting you or your company by refusing to do the work?
Playing political games (including handling colleagues when you don't need to, going over your bosses head because you don't like how they handle people and rebelling against work you are given) for rewards based on pride is not going to work in your favor, you're going to be in trouble because you are not doing what you are being paid to do.
So no, I don't think it's appropriate.
add a comment |Â
up vote
10
down vote
I don't see why someone falsely taking credit for your work is any reason for you not to do the work you are paid for. What difference would it make to you or your company if they did take credit? What's to stop him/her taking credit for anything, even things he had nothing to do with? Does it stop you taking credit later? Also, how would you be benefiting you or your company by refusing to do the work?
Playing political games (including handling colleagues when you don't need to, going over your bosses head because you don't like how they handle people and rebelling against work you are given) for rewards based on pride is not going to work in your favor, you're going to be in trouble because you are not doing what you are being paid to do.
So no, I don't think it's appropriate.
add a comment |Â
up vote
10
down vote
up vote
10
down vote
I don't see why someone falsely taking credit for your work is any reason for you not to do the work you are paid for. What difference would it make to you or your company if they did take credit? What's to stop him/her taking credit for anything, even things he had nothing to do with? Does it stop you taking credit later? Also, how would you be benefiting you or your company by refusing to do the work?
Playing political games (including handling colleagues when you don't need to, going over your bosses head because you don't like how they handle people and rebelling against work you are given) for rewards based on pride is not going to work in your favor, you're going to be in trouble because you are not doing what you are being paid to do.
So no, I don't think it's appropriate.
I don't see why someone falsely taking credit for your work is any reason for you not to do the work you are paid for. What difference would it make to you or your company if they did take credit? What's to stop him/her taking credit for anything, even things he had nothing to do with? Does it stop you taking credit later? Also, how would you be benefiting you or your company by refusing to do the work?
Playing political games (including handling colleagues when you don't need to, going over your bosses head because you don't like how they handle people and rebelling against work you are given) for rewards based on pride is not going to work in your favor, you're going to be in trouble because you are not doing what you are being paid to do.
So no, I don't think it's appropriate.
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:48
Community♦
1
1
answered Jan 14 '14 at 9:29
Ross Drew
2,523930
2,523930
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
Your boss couldn't settle with your colleague's poor work and decided to reassign the task to you. That implies that the task is important to your boss - maybe even to the entire company. refusing to complete it would be sacrificing the interest of the employer for the sake of revenge on the colleague - something I doubt your boss would like.
No - it is not appropriate.
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
Your boss couldn't settle with your colleague's poor work and decided to reassign the task to you. That implies that the task is important to your boss - maybe even to the entire company. refusing to complete it would be sacrificing the interest of the employer for the sake of revenge on the colleague - something I doubt your boss would like.
No - it is not appropriate.
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
Your boss couldn't settle with your colleague's poor work and decided to reassign the task to you. That implies that the task is important to your boss - maybe even to the entire company. refusing to complete it would be sacrificing the interest of the employer for the sake of revenge on the colleague - something I doubt your boss would like.
No - it is not appropriate.
Your boss couldn't settle with your colleague's poor work and decided to reassign the task to you. That implies that the task is important to your boss - maybe even to the entire company. refusing to complete it would be sacrificing the interest of the employer for the sake of revenge on the colleague - something I doubt your boss would like.
No - it is not appropriate.
answered Jan 14 '14 at 10:04


Idan Arye
24612
24612
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
A new employer has no guarantee that anything in a resume is 100% true, embellished, or a downright lie. It may appear unjust that your colleague appears to have got a new job based on falsely claiming credit, but it's up to the new company to verify facts and if they don't, more fool them. Refusing to do your company's work because you're peeved about the situation is petulant - you should be glad that you're rid of the colleague, and you have a chance to prove how much more valuable you are than he was.
And if he doesn't deliver the goods at this new company he will in due course be found out. It's not a trick you can pull repeatedly.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
A new employer has no guarantee that anything in a resume is 100% true, embellished, or a downright lie. It may appear unjust that your colleague appears to have got a new job based on falsely claiming credit, but it's up to the new company to verify facts and if they don't, more fool them. Refusing to do your company's work because you're peeved about the situation is petulant - you should be glad that you're rid of the colleague, and you have a chance to prove how much more valuable you are than he was.
And if he doesn't deliver the goods at this new company he will in due course be found out. It's not a trick you can pull repeatedly.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
A new employer has no guarantee that anything in a resume is 100% true, embellished, or a downright lie. It may appear unjust that your colleague appears to have got a new job based on falsely claiming credit, but it's up to the new company to verify facts and if they don't, more fool them. Refusing to do your company's work because you're peeved about the situation is petulant - you should be glad that you're rid of the colleague, and you have a chance to prove how much more valuable you are than he was.
And if he doesn't deliver the goods at this new company he will in due course be found out. It's not a trick you can pull repeatedly.
A new employer has no guarantee that anything in a resume is 100% true, embellished, or a downright lie. It may appear unjust that your colleague appears to have got a new job based on falsely claiming credit, but it's up to the new company to verify facts and if they don't, more fool them. Refusing to do your company's work because you're peeved about the situation is petulant - you should be glad that you're rid of the colleague, and you have a chance to prove how much more valuable you are than he was.
And if he doesn't deliver the goods at this new company he will in due course be found out. It's not a trick you can pull repeatedly.
answered Jan 14 '14 at 9:48
Julia Hayward
12k53438
12k53438
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
2
Why do you even care about this?
– Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Jan 14 '14 at 9:49
4
As Ross Drew answered, not just it's inappropriate, but it can be seen as a huge red flag for your boss. You're worrying more about not something that could benefit your ex-colleague than the task that needs to be done by your company. Suppose that this tasks involves finishing a feature for a product that a big client requested. Just because this hapenned, does not mean the feature can be simply cancelled. If you like your job, I highly suggest thinking about it too.
– Hugo Rocha
Jan 14 '14 at 11:58
1
Well personally, I'd fire you if you did that. It is highly unprofessional. You have been assigned the work, just do it.
– HLGEM
Jan 14 '14 at 14:07
4
How on earth would you not finishing the task prevent him from saying whatever he wants to in his resume?
– HLGEM
Jan 14 '14 at 16:24
4
If I was your boss, and you decided not to complete tasks I assigned you because you were afraid your ex-colleague would take credit for them, you'd be following him out the door - although I would be generous enough to express my fervent hope that it did not hit you on the ass on your way out.
– Carson63000
Jan 15 '14 at 2:01