Mixing
Why non-governmental organizations tend to publish non peer-reviewed “grey†literature?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is there any reason why most non-governmental organizations (NGOs) tend to publish non-peer reviewed literature? I have seen some NGO scientists as co-authors, even in some important papers, but most of their production is reports which are not peer-reviewed. While it is true that most NGOs do not do basic research but some of their reports could be easily converted in reviews, some of their projects in applied research.
Do they want to avoid peer review for political reasons to be able to convey the message they want? In my view their message would be much stronger if it came from a peer-reviewed article. Is it also a matter of time as peer-reviewed articles take a long time to get published?
peer-review grey-literature ngo
asked 3 hours ago
Herman Toothrot
5,93773465
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is there any reason why most non-governmental organizations (NGOs) tend to publish non-peer reviewed literature? I have seen some NGO scientists as co-authors, even in some important papers, but most of their production is reports which are not peer-reviewed. While it is true that most NGOs do not do basic research but some of their reports could be easily converted in reviews, some of their projects in applied research.
Do they want to avoid peer review for political reasons to be able to convey the message they want? In my view their message would be much stronger if it came from a peer-reviewed article. Is it also a matter of time as peer-reviewed articles take a long time to get published?
peer-review grey-literature ngo
asked 3 hours ago
Herman Toothrot
5,93773465
What is NGO here?
– Dmitry Savostyanov
3 hours ago
@DmitrySavostyanov thanks, fixed!
– Herman Toothrot
3 hours ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is there any reason why most non-governmental organizations (NGOs) tend to publish non-peer reviewed literature? I have seen some NGO scientists as co-authors, even in some important papers, but most of their production is reports which are not peer-reviewed. While it is true that most NGOs do not do basic research but some of their reports could be easily converted in reviews, some of their projects in applied research.
Do they want to avoid peer review for political reasons to be able to convey the message they want? In my view their message would be much stronger if it came from a peer-reviewed article. Is it also a matter of time as peer-reviewed articles take a long time to get published?
peer-review grey-literature ngo
asked 3 hours ago
Herman Toothrot
5,93773465
Is there any reason why most non-governmental organizations (NGOs) tend to publish non-peer reviewed literature? I have seen some NGO scientists as co-authors, even in some important papers, but most of their production is reports which are not peer-reviewed. While it is true that most NGOs do not do basic research but some of their reports could be easily converted in reviews, some of their projects in applied research.
Do they want to avoid peer review for political reasons to be able to convey the message they want? In my view their message would be much stronger if it came from a peer-reviewed article. Is it also a matter of time as peer-reviewed articles take a long time to get published?
peer-review grey-literature ngo
peer-review grey-literature ngo
asked 3 hours ago
Herman Toothrot
5,93773465
asked 3 hours ago
Herman Toothrot
5,93773465
edited 3 hours ago
asked 3 hours ago
Herman Toothrot
5,93773465
asked 3 hours ago
Herman Toothrot
5,93773465
asked 3 hours ago
Herman Toothrot
5,93773465
5,93773465
What is NGO here?
– Dmitry Savostyanov
3 hours ago
@DmitrySavostyanov thanks, fixed!
– Herman Toothrot
3 hours ago
add a comment |Â
What is NGO here?
– Dmitry Savostyanov
3 hours ago
@DmitrySavostyanov thanks, fixed!
– Herman Toothrot
3 hours ago
What is NGO here?
– Dmitry Savostyanov
3 hours ago
What is NGO here?
– Dmitry Savostyanov
3 hours ago
@DmitrySavostyanov thanks, fixed!
– Herman Toothrot
3 hours ago
@DmitrySavostyanov thanks, fixed!
– Herman Toothrot
3 hours ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
I can think of a couple of reasons:
- Peer review is slow. NGOs want their paper to influence policy now, not in one or two years from now.
- Peer review journals have a different audience than grey literature. NGOs typically want to communicate with people like policy makers or journalists, and these are less likely to read peer reviewed journals.
- Related to point 2: in order to effectively communicate with their intended audience they need a different style of writing and presenting their arguments than what is common and acceptable in peer reviewed journals.
answered 3 hours ago
Maarten Buis
20.2k24566
3
There may also be a fourth, slightly more nefarious, reason. NGOs are political players, some of their findings may not withstand a careful examination of their methods. That is, I don't question the good intentions of a vast majority of NGOs, but they inherently have an agenda.
– xLeitix
2 hours ago
I agree with these points but not completely with point number 2, if you publish a peer-reviewed article there is nothing stopping you to create a separate document or report that presents the same results in a more accessible way.
– Herman Toothrot
2 hours ago
@HermanToothrot Sure, but writing a peer-reviewed paper costs time and money (both not things that most NGOs have excessive amounts of). If it does not help them, why do it?
– xLeitix
2 hours ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
I can think of a couple of reasons:
- Peer review is slow. NGOs want their paper to influence policy now, not in one or two years from now.
- Peer review journals have a different audience than grey literature. NGOs typically want to communicate with people like policy makers or journalists, and these are less likely to read peer reviewed journals.
- Related to point 2: in order to effectively communicate with their intended audience they need a different style of writing and presenting their arguments than what is common and acceptable in peer reviewed journals.
answered 3 hours ago
Maarten Buis
20.2k24566
3
There may also be a fourth, slightly more nefarious, reason. NGOs are political players, some of their findings may not withstand a careful examination of their methods. That is, I don't question the good intentions of a vast majority of NGOs, but they inherently have an agenda.
– xLeitix
2 hours ago
I agree with these points but not completely with point number 2, if you publish a peer-reviewed article there is nothing stopping you to create a separate document or report that presents the same results in a more accessible way.
– Herman Toothrot
2 hours ago
@HermanToothrot Sure, but writing a peer-reviewed paper costs time and money (both not things that most NGOs have excessive amounts of). If it does not help them, why do it?
– xLeitix
2 hours ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
I can think of a couple of reasons:
- Peer review is slow. NGOs want their paper to influence policy now, not in one or two years from now.
- Peer review journals have a different audience than grey literature. NGOs typically want to communicate with people like policy makers or journalists, and these are less likely to read peer reviewed journals.
- Related to point 2: in order to effectively communicate with their intended audience they need a different style of writing and presenting their arguments than what is common and acceptable in peer reviewed journals.
answered 3 hours ago
Maarten Buis
20.2k24566
3
There may also be a fourth, slightly more nefarious, reason. NGOs are political players, some of their findings may not withstand a careful examination of their methods. That is, I don't question the good intentions of a vast majority of NGOs, but they inherently have an agenda.
– xLeitix
2 hours ago
I agree with these points but not completely with point number 2, if you publish a peer-reviewed article there is nothing stopping you to create a separate document or report that presents the same results in a more accessible way.
– Herman Toothrot
2 hours ago
@HermanToothrot Sure, but writing a peer-reviewed paper costs time and money (both not things that most NGOs have excessive amounts of). If it does not help them, why do it?
– xLeitix
2 hours ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
I can think of a couple of reasons:
- Peer review is slow. NGOs want their paper to influence policy now, not in one or two years from now.
- Peer review journals have a different audience than grey literature. NGOs typically want to communicate with people like policy makers or journalists, and these are less likely to read peer reviewed journals.
- Related to point 2: in order to effectively communicate with their intended audience they need a different style of writing and presenting their arguments than what is common and acceptable in peer reviewed journals.
answered 3 hours ago
Maarten Buis
20.2k24566
I can think of a couple of reasons:
- Peer review is slow. NGOs want their paper to influence policy now, not in one or two years from now.
- Peer review journals have a different audience than grey literature. NGOs typically want to communicate with people like policy makers or journalists, and these are less likely to read peer reviewed journals.
- Related to point 2: in order to effectively communicate with their intended audience they need a different style of writing and presenting their arguments than what is common and acceptable in peer reviewed journals.
answered 3 hours ago
Maarten Buis
20.2k24566
answered 3 hours ago
Maarten Buis
20.2k24566
answered 3 hours ago
Maarten Buis
20.2k24566
answered 3 hours ago
Maarten Buis
20.2k24566
20.2k24566
3
There may also be a fourth, slightly more nefarious, reason. NGOs are political players, some of their findings may not withstand a careful examination of their methods. That is, I don't question the good intentions of a vast majority of NGOs, but they inherently have an agenda.
– xLeitix
2 hours ago
I agree with these points but not completely with point number 2, if you publish a peer-reviewed article there is nothing stopping you to create a separate document or report that presents the same results in a more accessible way.
– Herman Toothrot
2 hours ago
@HermanToothrot Sure, but writing a peer-reviewed paper costs time and money (both not things that most NGOs have excessive amounts of). If it does not help them, why do it?
– xLeitix
2 hours ago
add a comment |Â
3
There may also be a fourth, slightly more nefarious, reason. NGOs are political players, some of their findings may not withstand a careful examination of their methods. That is, I don't question the good intentions of a vast majority of NGOs, but they inherently have an agenda.
– xLeitix
2 hours ago
I agree with these points but not completely with point number 2, if you publish a peer-reviewed article there is nothing stopping you to create a separate document or report that presents the same results in a more accessible way.
– Herman Toothrot
2 hours ago
@HermanToothrot Sure, but writing a peer-reviewed paper costs time and money (both not things that most NGOs have excessive amounts of). If it does not help them, why do it?
– xLeitix
2 hours ago
3
3
There may also be a fourth, slightly more nefarious, reason. NGOs are political players, some of their findings may not withstand a careful examination of their methods. That is, I don't question the good intentions of a vast majority of NGOs, but they inherently have an agenda.
– xLeitix
2 hours ago
There may also be a fourth, slightly more nefarious, reason. NGOs are political players, some of their findings may not withstand a careful examination of their methods. That is, I don't question the good intentions of a vast majority of NGOs, but they inherently have an agenda.
– xLeitix
2 hours ago
I agree with these points but not completely with point number 2, if you publish a peer-reviewed article there is nothing stopping you to create a separate document or report that presents the same results in a more accessible way.
– Herman Toothrot
2 hours ago
I agree with these points but not completely with point number 2, if you publish a peer-reviewed article there is nothing stopping you to create a separate document or report that presents the same results in a more accessible way.
– Herman Toothrot
2 hours ago
@HermanToothrot Sure, but writing a peer-reviewed paper costs time and money (both not things that most NGOs have excessive amounts of). If it does not help them, why do it?
– xLeitix
2 hours ago
@HermanToothrot Sure, but writing a peer-reviewed paper costs time and money (both not things that most NGOs have excessive amounts of). If it does not help them, why do it?
– xLeitix
2 hours ago
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117550%2fwhy-non-governmental-organizations-tend-to-publish-non-peer-reviewed-grey-lite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
What is NGO here?
– Dmitry Savostyanov
3 hours ago
@DmitrySavostyanov thanks, fixed!
– Herman Toothrot
3 hours ago