Can Wish create multiple effects at half value?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
The wish spell has these two specific effects in question..
You grant up to ten creatures that you can see Resistance to a damage type you choose.
You grant up to ten creatures you can see immunity to a single spell or other magical effect for 8 hours. For instance, you could make yourself and all your companions immune to a lich's life drain Attack.
If I'm part of a party of 5 players, could I have both of these effects on each of us after 1 casting, since that's below the maximum amount of creatures described. For instance
"I wish for me and my party to be immune to fire damage and resistant to cold damage."
or
"I wish for me an my party to be immune to necrotic damage for the next eight hours and then be resistance to necrotic damage from that point onwards."
or, rewording the books example (also I can't find "life drain" anywhere in the Monster Manual for 5th edition)
"I wish for me and my party to be immune to a lich's finger of death Attack and then be resistance to necrotic damage from then on
Would any of these wishes come true?
dnd-5e spells wish
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
The wish spell has these two specific effects in question..
You grant up to ten creatures that you can see Resistance to a damage type you choose.
You grant up to ten creatures you can see immunity to a single spell or other magical effect for 8 hours. For instance, you could make yourself and all your companions immune to a lich's life drain Attack.
If I'm part of a party of 5 players, could I have both of these effects on each of us after 1 casting, since that's below the maximum amount of creatures described. For instance
"I wish for me and my party to be immune to fire damage and resistant to cold damage."
or
"I wish for me an my party to be immune to necrotic damage for the next eight hours and then be resistance to necrotic damage from that point onwards."
or, rewording the books example (also I can't find "life drain" anywhere in the Monster Manual for 5th edition)
"I wish for me and my party to be immune to a lich's finger of death Attack and then be resistance to necrotic damage from then on
Would any of these wishes come true?
dnd-5e spells wish
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
The wish spell has these two specific effects in question..
You grant up to ten creatures that you can see Resistance to a damage type you choose.
You grant up to ten creatures you can see immunity to a single spell or other magical effect for 8 hours. For instance, you could make yourself and all your companions immune to a lich's life drain Attack.
If I'm part of a party of 5 players, could I have both of these effects on each of us after 1 casting, since that's below the maximum amount of creatures described. For instance
"I wish for me and my party to be immune to fire damage and resistant to cold damage."
or
"I wish for me an my party to be immune to necrotic damage for the next eight hours and then be resistance to necrotic damage from that point onwards."
or, rewording the books example (also I can't find "life drain" anywhere in the Monster Manual for 5th edition)
"I wish for me and my party to be immune to a lich's finger of death Attack and then be resistance to necrotic damage from then on
Would any of these wishes come true?
dnd-5e spells wish
The wish spell has these two specific effects in question..
You grant up to ten creatures that you can see Resistance to a damage type you choose.
You grant up to ten creatures you can see immunity to a single spell or other magical effect for 8 hours. For instance, you could make yourself and all your companions immune to a lich's life drain Attack.
If I'm part of a party of 5 players, could I have both of these effects on each of us after 1 casting, since that's below the maximum amount of creatures described. For instance
"I wish for me and my party to be immune to fire damage and resistant to cold damage."
or
"I wish for me an my party to be immune to necrotic damage for the next eight hours and then be resistance to necrotic damage from that point onwards."
or, rewording the books example (also I can't find "life drain" anywhere in the Monster Manual for 5th edition)
"I wish for me and my party to be immune to a lich's finger of death Attack and then be resistance to necrotic damage from then on
Would any of these wishes come true?
dnd-5e spells wish
dnd-5e spells wish
edited 1 hour ago
Vylix
6,42412290
6,42412290
asked 2 hours ago
Youjay
2,0292940
2,0292940
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
This can't be done with a single Wish.
Wish states:
Alternatively, you can create one of the following effects of your choice...
Granting creatures resistance or immunity are two, separate effects and would require two castings of Wish.
Mentioning that the wish might actually come true as a "greater" wish would make this answer complete.
– Szega
21 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
As worded that is probably 2 wishes
Stringing the sentence together with 'and' doesn't make it a single wish. The spell is capable of giving the effects you asked for on an individual basis, but probably not together regardless of numbers (Most parties are only 4, so it is likely that if what you wanted was an option it would be worded as 'can do x and y for a party of 4, or just x for a group of up to 10').
That said..
Wish is extremely DM dependent, so only your particular DM can actually provide an answer to that question.
@illustro You have a whole answer post where you can write the answer you think is most correct. Please put your reasoning there instead of arguing with the other answers.
– SevenSidedDie♦
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Possibly, but it definitely falls into the realm of DM discretion
Wish contains the text:
You might be able to achieve something beyond the scope of the above examples. State your wish to the DM as precisely as possible. The DM has great latitude in ruling what occurs in such an instance; the greater the wish, the greater the likelihood that something goes wrong. This spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence as a result of how you worded the wish.
As a DM in that situation I would probably allow chaining of standard effects, while keeping the total creatures affected by each effect under the total for a single effect, like you describe. Ask your DM.
It would be nice to know what the defect with my answer is so I can correct it.
– illustro
1 hour ago
It isn't 'defective' specifically, but I disagree with your premise that it is possible outside of very generous DM fiat.
– SeriousBri
16 mins ago
@SeriousBri Considering what things Wish's unrestricted mode is usually used for, it doesn't seem particularly generous to me to allow splitting the unrestricted Wish (along with its penalties, including possibly losing Wish forever) between two restricted powers. Care to elaborate?
– kviiri
2 mins ago
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
This can't be done with a single Wish.
Wish states:
Alternatively, you can create one of the following effects of your choice...
Granting creatures resistance or immunity are two, separate effects and would require two castings of Wish.
Mentioning that the wish might actually come true as a "greater" wish would make this answer complete.
– Szega
21 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
This can't be done with a single Wish.
Wish states:
Alternatively, you can create one of the following effects of your choice...
Granting creatures resistance or immunity are two, separate effects and would require two castings of Wish.
Mentioning that the wish might actually come true as a "greater" wish would make this answer complete.
– Szega
21 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
This can't be done with a single Wish.
Wish states:
Alternatively, you can create one of the following effects of your choice...
Granting creatures resistance or immunity are two, separate effects and would require two castings of Wish.
This can't be done with a single Wish.
Wish states:
Alternatively, you can create one of the following effects of your choice...
Granting creatures resistance or immunity are two, separate effects and would require two castings of Wish.
answered 2 hours ago


Purple Monkey
35.3k7140218
35.3k7140218
Mentioning that the wish might actually come true as a "greater" wish would make this answer complete.
– Szega
21 mins ago
add a comment |Â
Mentioning that the wish might actually come true as a "greater" wish would make this answer complete.
– Szega
21 mins ago
Mentioning that the wish might actually come true as a "greater" wish would make this answer complete.
– Szega
21 mins ago
Mentioning that the wish might actually come true as a "greater" wish would make this answer complete.
– Szega
21 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
As worded that is probably 2 wishes
Stringing the sentence together with 'and' doesn't make it a single wish. The spell is capable of giving the effects you asked for on an individual basis, but probably not together regardless of numbers (Most parties are only 4, so it is likely that if what you wanted was an option it would be worded as 'can do x and y for a party of 4, or just x for a group of up to 10').
That said..
Wish is extremely DM dependent, so only your particular DM can actually provide an answer to that question.
@illustro You have a whole answer post where you can write the answer you think is most correct. Please put your reasoning there instead of arguing with the other answers.
– SevenSidedDie♦
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
As worded that is probably 2 wishes
Stringing the sentence together with 'and' doesn't make it a single wish. The spell is capable of giving the effects you asked for on an individual basis, but probably not together regardless of numbers (Most parties are only 4, so it is likely that if what you wanted was an option it would be worded as 'can do x and y for a party of 4, or just x for a group of up to 10').
That said..
Wish is extremely DM dependent, so only your particular DM can actually provide an answer to that question.
@illustro You have a whole answer post where you can write the answer you think is most correct. Please put your reasoning there instead of arguing with the other answers.
– SevenSidedDie♦
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
As worded that is probably 2 wishes
Stringing the sentence together with 'and' doesn't make it a single wish. The spell is capable of giving the effects you asked for on an individual basis, but probably not together regardless of numbers (Most parties are only 4, so it is likely that if what you wanted was an option it would be worded as 'can do x and y for a party of 4, or just x for a group of up to 10').
That said..
Wish is extremely DM dependent, so only your particular DM can actually provide an answer to that question.
As worded that is probably 2 wishes
Stringing the sentence together with 'and' doesn't make it a single wish. The spell is capable of giving the effects you asked for on an individual basis, but probably not together regardless of numbers (Most parties are only 4, so it is likely that if what you wanted was an option it would be worded as 'can do x and y for a party of 4, or just x for a group of up to 10').
That said..
Wish is extremely DM dependent, so only your particular DM can actually provide an answer to that question.
answered 2 hours ago
SeriousBri
4,10911038
4,10911038
@illustro You have a whole answer post where you can write the answer you think is most correct. Please put your reasoning there instead of arguing with the other answers.
– SevenSidedDie♦
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
@illustro You have a whole answer post where you can write the answer you think is most correct. Please put your reasoning there instead of arguing with the other answers.
– SevenSidedDie♦
1 hour ago
@illustro You have a whole answer post where you can write the answer you think is most correct. Please put your reasoning there instead of arguing with the other answers.
– SevenSidedDie♦
1 hour ago
@illustro You have a whole answer post where you can write the answer you think is most correct. Please put your reasoning there instead of arguing with the other answers.
– SevenSidedDie♦
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Possibly, but it definitely falls into the realm of DM discretion
Wish contains the text:
You might be able to achieve something beyond the scope of the above examples. State your wish to the DM as precisely as possible. The DM has great latitude in ruling what occurs in such an instance; the greater the wish, the greater the likelihood that something goes wrong. This spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence as a result of how you worded the wish.
As a DM in that situation I would probably allow chaining of standard effects, while keeping the total creatures affected by each effect under the total for a single effect, like you describe. Ask your DM.
It would be nice to know what the defect with my answer is so I can correct it.
– illustro
1 hour ago
It isn't 'defective' specifically, but I disagree with your premise that it is possible outside of very generous DM fiat.
– SeriousBri
16 mins ago
@SeriousBri Considering what things Wish's unrestricted mode is usually used for, it doesn't seem particularly generous to me to allow splitting the unrestricted Wish (along with its penalties, including possibly losing Wish forever) between two restricted powers. Care to elaborate?
– kviiri
2 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Possibly, but it definitely falls into the realm of DM discretion
Wish contains the text:
You might be able to achieve something beyond the scope of the above examples. State your wish to the DM as precisely as possible. The DM has great latitude in ruling what occurs in such an instance; the greater the wish, the greater the likelihood that something goes wrong. This spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence as a result of how you worded the wish.
As a DM in that situation I would probably allow chaining of standard effects, while keeping the total creatures affected by each effect under the total for a single effect, like you describe. Ask your DM.
It would be nice to know what the defect with my answer is so I can correct it.
– illustro
1 hour ago
It isn't 'defective' specifically, but I disagree with your premise that it is possible outside of very generous DM fiat.
– SeriousBri
16 mins ago
@SeriousBri Considering what things Wish's unrestricted mode is usually used for, it doesn't seem particularly generous to me to allow splitting the unrestricted Wish (along with its penalties, including possibly losing Wish forever) between two restricted powers. Care to elaborate?
– kviiri
2 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Possibly, but it definitely falls into the realm of DM discretion
Wish contains the text:
You might be able to achieve something beyond the scope of the above examples. State your wish to the DM as precisely as possible. The DM has great latitude in ruling what occurs in such an instance; the greater the wish, the greater the likelihood that something goes wrong. This spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence as a result of how you worded the wish.
As a DM in that situation I would probably allow chaining of standard effects, while keeping the total creatures affected by each effect under the total for a single effect, like you describe. Ask your DM.
Possibly, but it definitely falls into the realm of DM discretion
Wish contains the text:
You might be able to achieve something beyond the scope of the above examples. State your wish to the DM as precisely as possible. The DM has great latitude in ruling what occurs in such an instance; the greater the wish, the greater the likelihood that something goes wrong. This spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence as a result of how you worded the wish.
As a DM in that situation I would probably allow chaining of standard effects, while keeping the total creatures affected by each effect under the total for a single effect, like you describe. Ask your DM.
edited 2 hours ago
answered 2 hours ago
illustro
4,23211235
4,23211235
It would be nice to know what the defect with my answer is so I can correct it.
– illustro
1 hour ago
It isn't 'defective' specifically, but I disagree with your premise that it is possible outside of very generous DM fiat.
– SeriousBri
16 mins ago
@SeriousBri Considering what things Wish's unrestricted mode is usually used for, it doesn't seem particularly generous to me to allow splitting the unrestricted Wish (along with its penalties, including possibly losing Wish forever) between two restricted powers. Care to elaborate?
– kviiri
2 mins ago
add a comment |Â
It would be nice to know what the defect with my answer is so I can correct it.
– illustro
1 hour ago
It isn't 'defective' specifically, but I disagree with your premise that it is possible outside of very generous DM fiat.
– SeriousBri
16 mins ago
@SeriousBri Considering what things Wish's unrestricted mode is usually used for, it doesn't seem particularly generous to me to allow splitting the unrestricted Wish (along with its penalties, including possibly losing Wish forever) between two restricted powers. Care to elaborate?
– kviiri
2 mins ago
It would be nice to know what the defect with my answer is so I can correct it.
– illustro
1 hour ago
It would be nice to know what the defect with my answer is so I can correct it.
– illustro
1 hour ago
It isn't 'defective' specifically, but I disagree with your premise that it is possible outside of very generous DM fiat.
– SeriousBri
16 mins ago
It isn't 'defective' specifically, but I disagree with your premise that it is possible outside of very generous DM fiat.
– SeriousBri
16 mins ago
@SeriousBri Considering what things Wish's unrestricted mode is usually used for, it doesn't seem particularly generous to me to allow splitting the unrestricted Wish (along with its penalties, including possibly losing Wish forever) between two restricted powers. Care to elaborate?
– kviiri
2 mins ago
@SeriousBri Considering what things Wish's unrestricted mode is usually used for, it doesn't seem particularly generous to me to allow splitting the unrestricted Wish (along with its penalties, including possibly losing Wish forever) between two restricted powers. Care to elaborate?
– kviiri
2 mins ago
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f132579%2fcan-wish-create-multiple-effects-at-half-value%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password