How can I show my manager and my director that different teams require desktops/laptops with different characteristics [duplicate]
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
How to push back on a management decision I know is wrong [duplicate]
5 answers
I'm wondering what's the best argument to prove to manager and my director that different teams require desktops/laptops with different characteristics?
I work for a medium sized company (+-350 employees) and the people responsible for choosing the hardware we use, insist that everyone must have hardware with the same characteristics...
So we have teams of consultants, QA, designers, programmers over a mainframe and web programmers. And for some reason everyone has a i5 4210, with 8 GB of RAM and a 750 HDD, except the designers that have iMac's, at least there they didn't force them to be like everyone else ( Thankfully :) ).
How can I prove to them that if the web programmer team (Java/JSP running all in local servers) would improve dramatically if they had a SSD and more RAM?
professionalism management productivity
marked as duplicate by gnat, yochannah, Garrison Neely, scaaahu, IDrinkandIKnowThings Jan 17 '15 at 4:02
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
How to push back on a management decision I know is wrong [duplicate]
5 answers
I'm wondering what's the best argument to prove to manager and my director that different teams require desktops/laptops with different characteristics?
I work for a medium sized company (+-350 employees) and the people responsible for choosing the hardware we use, insist that everyone must have hardware with the same characteristics...
So we have teams of consultants, QA, designers, programmers over a mainframe and web programmers. And for some reason everyone has a i5 4210, with 8 GB of RAM and a 750 HDD, except the designers that have iMac's, at least there they didn't force them to be like everyone else ( Thankfully :) ).
How can I prove to them that if the web programmer team (Java/JSP running all in local servers) would improve dramatically if they had a SSD and more RAM?
professionalism management productivity
marked as duplicate by gnat, yochannah, Garrison Neely, scaaahu, IDrinkandIKnowThings Jan 17 '15 at 4:02
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
How to push back on a management decision I know is wrong [duplicate]
5 answers
I'm wondering what's the best argument to prove to manager and my director that different teams require desktops/laptops with different characteristics?
I work for a medium sized company (+-350 employees) and the people responsible for choosing the hardware we use, insist that everyone must have hardware with the same characteristics...
So we have teams of consultants, QA, designers, programmers over a mainframe and web programmers. And for some reason everyone has a i5 4210, with 8 GB of RAM and a 750 HDD, except the designers that have iMac's, at least there they didn't force them to be like everyone else ( Thankfully :) ).
How can I prove to them that if the web programmer team (Java/JSP running all in local servers) would improve dramatically if they had a SSD and more RAM?
professionalism management productivity
This question already has an answer here:
How to push back on a management decision I know is wrong [duplicate]
5 answers
I'm wondering what's the best argument to prove to manager and my director that different teams require desktops/laptops with different characteristics?
I work for a medium sized company (+-350 employees) and the people responsible for choosing the hardware we use, insist that everyone must have hardware with the same characteristics...
So we have teams of consultants, QA, designers, programmers over a mainframe and web programmers. And for some reason everyone has a i5 4210, with 8 GB of RAM and a 750 HDD, except the designers that have iMac's, at least there they didn't force them to be like everyone else ( Thankfully :) ).
How can I prove to them that if the web programmer team (Java/JSP running all in local servers) would improve dramatically if they had a SSD and more RAM?
This question already has an answer here:
How to push back on a management decision I know is wrong [duplicate]
5 answers
professionalism management productivity
asked Jan 15 '15 at 12:09


Gonçalo Cardoso
1033
1033
marked as duplicate by gnat, yochannah, Garrison Neely, scaaahu, IDrinkandIKnowThings Jan 17 '15 at 4:02
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by gnat, yochannah, Garrison Neely, scaaahu, IDrinkandIKnowThings Jan 17 '15 at 4:02
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
suggest improvements |Â
suggest improvements |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Pick a large program, do a build on a company machine and the same one on a fast machine with better CPU and SSD (and maybe 16 GB, 8 GB is not bad), calculate the time difference. Multiply with the number of programmers and the number of builds per unit of time.
FWIW My colleague sitting next to me works in Visual Studio + Xamarin Android. When he builds to the Android emulator that takes >1 minute on a decent machine - with every build.
And maybe this helps:
Does giving a developer a slower development machine result in faster/more efficient code?
The Programmer's Bill of Rights
Are long compiles a thing of the past?
Here's an answer from the first link that really drives it home:
I like long compile times. It gives me more time to work on my resume.
From XKCD:
suggest improvements |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Pick a large program, do a build on a company machine and the same one on a fast machine with better CPU and SSD (and maybe 16 GB, 8 GB is not bad), calculate the time difference. Multiply with the number of programmers and the number of builds per unit of time.
FWIW My colleague sitting next to me works in Visual Studio + Xamarin Android. When he builds to the Android emulator that takes >1 minute on a decent machine - with every build.
And maybe this helps:
Does giving a developer a slower development machine result in faster/more efficient code?
The Programmer's Bill of Rights
Are long compiles a thing of the past?
Here's an answer from the first link that really drives it home:
I like long compile times. It gives me more time to work on my resume.
From XKCD:
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Pick a large program, do a build on a company machine and the same one on a fast machine with better CPU and SSD (and maybe 16 GB, 8 GB is not bad), calculate the time difference. Multiply with the number of programmers and the number of builds per unit of time.
FWIW My colleague sitting next to me works in Visual Studio + Xamarin Android. When he builds to the Android emulator that takes >1 minute on a decent machine - with every build.
And maybe this helps:
Does giving a developer a slower development machine result in faster/more efficient code?
The Programmer's Bill of Rights
Are long compiles a thing of the past?
Here's an answer from the first link that really drives it home:
I like long compile times. It gives me more time to work on my resume.
From XKCD:
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Pick a large program, do a build on a company machine and the same one on a fast machine with better CPU and SSD (and maybe 16 GB, 8 GB is not bad), calculate the time difference. Multiply with the number of programmers and the number of builds per unit of time.
FWIW My colleague sitting next to me works in Visual Studio + Xamarin Android. When he builds to the Android emulator that takes >1 minute on a decent machine - with every build.
And maybe this helps:
Does giving a developer a slower development machine result in faster/more efficient code?
The Programmer's Bill of Rights
Are long compiles a thing of the past?
Here's an answer from the first link that really drives it home:
I like long compile times. It gives me more time to work on my resume.
From XKCD:
Pick a large program, do a build on a company machine and the same one on a fast machine with better CPU and SSD (and maybe 16 GB, 8 GB is not bad), calculate the time difference. Multiply with the number of programmers and the number of builds per unit of time.
FWIW My colleague sitting next to me works in Visual Studio + Xamarin Android. When he builds to the Android emulator that takes >1 minute on a decent machine - with every build.
And maybe this helps:
Does giving a developer a slower development machine result in faster/more efficient code?
The Programmer's Bill of Rights
Are long compiles a thing of the past?
Here's an answer from the first link that really drives it home:
I like long compile times. It gives me more time to work on my resume.
From XKCD:
edited Apr 12 '17 at 7:31
Community♦
1
1
answered Jan 15 '15 at 12:18


Jan Doggen
11.5k145066
11.5k145066
suggest improvements |Â
suggest improvements |Â