How can I deal with senior colleagues constantly getting my name wrong?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
34
down vote
favorite
I work in the UK and I have a fairly normal "British" name. Having worked in my company for three years with my name plastered all around my desk, my person and my email, some senior colleagues still don't get my name right. This has led to serious problems when, for example, a group email gets sent around with actions for "Jill Bloggs" when my name is actually "Jane Doe", or worse, for "JB".
Mostly I just shrug it off and ignore it, maybe quietly changing my name to be the correct one where I can, however the most recent occurrance has led to a client being upset that (as far as they could see) a different resource was working for them than had been promised.
How should I gently remind people what my name is? When should I do it; immediately or quietly at a later date? I don't get much face to face contact with the majority of my colleagues so it's difficult to physically pull them aside.
professionalism intervention
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
 |Â
show 6 more comments
up vote
34
down vote
favorite
I work in the UK and I have a fairly normal "British" name. Having worked in my company for three years with my name plastered all around my desk, my person and my email, some senior colleagues still don't get my name right. This has led to serious problems when, for example, a group email gets sent around with actions for "Jill Bloggs" when my name is actually "Jane Doe", or worse, for "JB".
Mostly I just shrug it off and ignore it, maybe quietly changing my name to be the correct one where I can, however the most recent occurrance has led to a client being upset that (as far as they could see) a different resource was working for them than had been promised.
How should I gently remind people what my name is? When should I do it; immediately or quietly at a later date? I don't get much face to face contact with the majority of my colleagues so it's difficult to physically pull them aside.
professionalism intervention
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
5
Was the responsible person aware of the problem it had caused to the client?? what was the reaction on that front
â Brandin
Aug 21 '14 at 14:42
1
@Brandin When it happened there was a bit of eye-rolling and a general air of "Silly client, can't he see that Jill Bloggs is similar to Jane Doe? It's obvious!!" Obviously the more sensible people involved just apologised to the client and explained there'd been a mix up but no other actions were actually taken.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:57
@GrahamBorland If it helps, over the last couple of years I have been called Amanda, Ruth, Julia, Rebecca, Elizabeth and Sarah (none of which are my first name), with a mix of my actual surname and other common british names like Baker, Brown, etc. This isn't just mixing up something like Jo/Joanna/Joanne (also not my name).
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 10:24
3
Are you the only person this issue happens to or is it a more general problem?
â Martin Smith
Aug 23 '14 at 12:27
@Ilythya â At this point, have you considered officially changing your name to "Jill Bloggs" ?
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:12
 |Â
show 6 more comments
up vote
34
down vote
favorite
up vote
34
down vote
favorite
I work in the UK and I have a fairly normal "British" name. Having worked in my company for three years with my name plastered all around my desk, my person and my email, some senior colleagues still don't get my name right. This has led to serious problems when, for example, a group email gets sent around with actions for "Jill Bloggs" when my name is actually "Jane Doe", or worse, for "JB".
Mostly I just shrug it off and ignore it, maybe quietly changing my name to be the correct one where I can, however the most recent occurrance has led to a client being upset that (as far as they could see) a different resource was working for them than had been promised.
How should I gently remind people what my name is? When should I do it; immediately or quietly at a later date? I don't get much face to face contact with the majority of my colleagues so it's difficult to physically pull them aside.
professionalism intervention
I work in the UK and I have a fairly normal "British" name. Having worked in my company for three years with my name plastered all around my desk, my person and my email, some senior colleagues still don't get my name right. This has led to serious problems when, for example, a group email gets sent around with actions for "Jill Bloggs" when my name is actually "Jane Doe", or worse, for "JB".
Mostly I just shrug it off and ignore it, maybe quietly changing my name to be the correct one where I can, however the most recent occurrance has led to a client being upset that (as far as they could see) a different resource was working for them than had been promised.
How should I gently remind people what my name is? When should I do it; immediately or quietly at a later date? I don't get much face to face contact with the majority of my colleagues so it's difficult to physically pull them aside.
professionalism intervention
edited Aug 21 '14 at 13:58
asked Aug 21 '14 at 13:29
Ilythya
93721014
93721014
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
5
Was the responsible person aware of the problem it had caused to the client?? what was the reaction on that front
â Brandin
Aug 21 '14 at 14:42
1
@Brandin When it happened there was a bit of eye-rolling and a general air of "Silly client, can't he see that Jill Bloggs is similar to Jane Doe? It's obvious!!" Obviously the more sensible people involved just apologised to the client and explained there'd been a mix up but no other actions were actually taken.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:57
@GrahamBorland If it helps, over the last couple of years I have been called Amanda, Ruth, Julia, Rebecca, Elizabeth and Sarah (none of which are my first name), with a mix of my actual surname and other common british names like Baker, Brown, etc. This isn't just mixing up something like Jo/Joanna/Joanne (also not my name).
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 10:24
3
Are you the only person this issue happens to or is it a more general problem?
â Martin Smith
Aug 23 '14 at 12:27
@Ilythya â At this point, have you considered officially changing your name to "Jill Bloggs" ?
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:12
 |Â
show 6 more comments
5
Was the responsible person aware of the problem it had caused to the client?? what was the reaction on that front
â Brandin
Aug 21 '14 at 14:42
1
@Brandin When it happened there was a bit of eye-rolling and a general air of "Silly client, can't he see that Jill Bloggs is similar to Jane Doe? It's obvious!!" Obviously the more sensible people involved just apologised to the client and explained there'd been a mix up but no other actions were actually taken.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:57
@GrahamBorland If it helps, over the last couple of years I have been called Amanda, Ruth, Julia, Rebecca, Elizabeth and Sarah (none of which are my first name), with a mix of my actual surname and other common british names like Baker, Brown, etc. This isn't just mixing up something like Jo/Joanna/Joanne (also not my name).
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 10:24
3
Are you the only person this issue happens to or is it a more general problem?
â Martin Smith
Aug 23 '14 at 12:27
@Ilythya â At this point, have you considered officially changing your name to "Jill Bloggs" ?
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:12
5
5
Was the responsible person aware of the problem it had caused to the client?? what was the reaction on that front
â Brandin
Aug 21 '14 at 14:42
Was the responsible person aware of the problem it had caused to the client?? what was the reaction on that front
â Brandin
Aug 21 '14 at 14:42
1
1
@Brandin When it happened there was a bit of eye-rolling and a general air of "Silly client, can't he see that Jill Bloggs is similar to Jane Doe? It's obvious!!" Obviously the more sensible people involved just apologised to the client and explained there'd been a mix up but no other actions were actually taken.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:57
@Brandin When it happened there was a bit of eye-rolling and a general air of "Silly client, can't he see that Jill Bloggs is similar to Jane Doe? It's obvious!!" Obviously the more sensible people involved just apologised to the client and explained there'd been a mix up but no other actions were actually taken.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:57
@GrahamBorland If it helps, over the last couple of years I have been called Amanda, Ruth, Julia, Rebecca, Elizabeth and Sarah (none of which are my first name), with a mix of my actual surname and other common british names like Baker, Brown, etc. This isn't just mixing up something like Jo/Joanna/Joanne (also not my name).
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 10:24
@GrahamBorland If it helps, over the last couple of years I have been called Amanda, Ruth, Julia, Rebecca, Elizabeth and Sarah (none of which are my first name), with a mix of my actual surname and other common british names like Baker, Brown, etc. This isn't just mixing up something like Jo/Joanna/Joanne (also not my name).
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 10:24
3
3
Are you the only person this issue happens to or is it a more general problem?
â Martin Smith
Aug 23 '14 at 12:27
Are you the only person this issue happens to or is it a more general problem?
â Martin Smith
Aug 23 '14 at 12:27
@Ilythya â At this point, have you considered officially changing your name to "Jill Bloggs" ?
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:12
@Ilythya â At this point, have you considered officially changing your name to "Jill Bloggs" ?
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:12
 |Â
show 6 more comments
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
up vote
65
down vote
accepted
This carelessness about your name has gone from affecting just you to affecting your firm's business. So it has gone from just rude to entirely unacceptable.
When someone gets your name wrong, you should immediately intervene, using the medium in which the error was made, saying:
With respect, my name is Jane Doe, not Jill Bloggs.
If the error is made over email, you should do it, with a reply-all, like this:
On Tuesday, Joe Mgr wrote:
We are assigning Ian Smith and Jill Bloggs to the TPS account.
Joe:
With respect, my name is Jane Doe, not Jill Bloggs. You may recall that the
people at Acme Rocket Sleds were annoyed by this confusion over my name.
I would appreciate your use of my correct name.
If the error is made in person, speak up right away.
You might even go for the over-the-top humorous approach, and wear a large tag for a few days saying "Hello, my name is Jane Doe."
In any case it's wise, and by no means offensive, for you to be assertive about correcting this. What's at stake? Your good name!
2
Just want to add that you need to do it with the correct tone and attitude, you are just clarifying in polite manner.
â BlueTrin
Aug 22 '14 at 9:50
7
I agree with the answer, but would like to point out one point. I wouldn't answer to all. If I understood your answer correctly there are only a small number of people "mixing-up" the names. By answering to all you publicly humiliate your superior with no obvious upside. By giving him the possibility that this was a mistake you let him keep his face. By quoting the serious incident you remind him however that this behavior is not acceptable for you.
â magu_
Aug 22 '14 at 15:10
1
@magu I would say as this problem has been a constant. reply-all is still inappropriate, but after a few one-on-one attempts to correct it fail. It's fair to respond in this manner with whomever their supervisor is. (As far as the project goes... if it's actual assignments then it is fair to reply to all and say "The task is assigned to Jane Doo, there is no Jull Bloggs here"
â RualStorge
Aug 22 '14 at 18:19
This is a sensible answer. Except that I would send the e-mail reply to the sender rather than to all.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 18:54
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
12
down vote
I think a lot of the other answers sound too aggressive for my tastes, especially if this has been going on for a couple years and just now you stir up a big fuss about it.
I would just casually notify everyone of the issue with the client and ask that everyone call you by your specific name so that there aren't any more issues like that. I'd imagine that most people would find the situation humorous, and that would help them remember.
1
I think the problem is that if it had been every week I would have already done something about it. The fact it crops up maybe once every couple of months means that I tend to just shrug it off as somebody having a busy day and getting mixed up. It's then all good for another couple of months at which point it happens again.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:59
5
Bringing up the issue in front of the client is NOT a good way to handle it - your company needs to be on the same page prior to bringing in a client - you don't want to person to say "Oh really? THAT'S your name?" in front of a client, so don't give them the opportunity - plan it out as best you can internally first. Surprising a senior person in front of a client is a very aggressive move, and one that will almost always backfire.
â user2813274
Aug 21 '14 at 15:03
4
@user2813274 I am not suggesting to bring it up in front of the client, just to remind everyone what happened with the client...
â Kik
Aug 21 '14 at 15:04
1
@user2813274 I'm not sure that was what was being suggested to be honest.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 15:05
1
Humour's definitely a good way to go: good natured embarrassment is memorable without harming relationships. How about a "Jill Jar" (like a "swear jar") where anybody who says your wrong name has to put in, say, £2, which goes towards a team social fund or charity?
â user568458
Aug 21 '14 at 16:01
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
10
down vote
I would remind the sender of such an e-mail immediately after I recognize their error. You could for example write back:
"I would like to kindly remind you that my name is Jane Doe, and not Jill Bloggs, as you have written. Please do your best to get my name right from now on. Spelling my name wrong has already led to misunderstandigs with a client once. Please help to avoid this."
If you have the opportunity, talk directly to this person, instead of or in addition to the e-mail.
You could consider "accidently " misspelling" or pronouncing the persons that has done this name in an internal meeting to make a point
â Pepone
Aug 21 '14 at 14:06
13
@Pepone I think that would very much depend on your relationship with the person involved. I would be uncomfortable coming across as too aggressive or rude with somebody senior than me.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:07
@Ilythya: professionalism is a word that gets thrown around a lot, but fundamentally it means 'doing your job'. if clients are affected by this and you don't take action because you are worried about being offensive then you are being unprofessional by neglecting your duties for personal reasons. likewise for someone senior to take offense and do anything about it is unprofessional of them for the same reason... or in short: if everyone just does their job at the most basic level this shouldn't even be a concern.
â jheriko
Aug 21 '14 at 22:04
@Ilythya You don't have to be aggressive or offensive to correct somebody's mistake. I know you mostly shrug it off and that's great. But remember that if anyone has the right to be offended, it's you.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:52
1
@jheriko As far as the client was concerned I hadn't noticed (not having been part of any discussions) until I showed up on the day to see their confused and slightly upset faces. Obviously when I got back to the office I raised it, although by that time the damage was done.
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 10:27
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
2
down vote
I would forward the client's e-mail that requests Jill Bloggs to the person who sent it originally, and ask them who this Jill Bloggs person is.
This is a misunderstanding that was created by the senior colleague, and thus should be resolved by them. You have done your part by bringing it up to them - you could even suggest hiring in the next person named "Jill Bloggs" to do the job and keep the customer happy.
3
@Ilythya asked about "gently reminding people what her name is". Your answer does not really answer her question, does it? And it's not a very gentle approach.
â prockel
Aug 21 '14 at 14:54
2
@prockel - an internal e-mail is just about the gentlest way possible - the thing is that this has been an ongoing issue, and anything less is likely to be ignored and ineffective. Physical interactions were mentioned as difficult to pull off, and an e-mail to the client is necessary, but not from the OP.
â user2813274
Aug 21 '14 at 15:00
This is not constructive. Jane Doe knows full well that the name "Jill Bloggs" is being used to refer to her so she should just correct the mistake. Playing dumb about it just causes confusion.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:45
@DavidRicherby only alternatives is to say nothing and just let them get on with calling you that, or to ignore anything addressed to that name and probably lose your job over it.
â jwenting
Aug 22 '14 at 9:58
@DavidRicherby I didn't realise that I was being called Jill Bloggs until I turned up at the client's office. Given the vast array of different names I've been assigned, it's often impossible to tell that one is supposed to refer to me until it's too late.
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 12:16
 |Â
show 3 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
I am incredibly terrible at remembering names, mostly with new people I am working with on a team. I had a similar situation where I went to a customer and indicated that John Smith would be working on a customers project, when in fact it was George Doe.
Of course this also affected the customer, and as a result George Doe was upset etc. He contacted me via email and indicated that I had forgotten his name and had incorrectly introduced him to a customer, cc-ing my manager. Of course this was not intentional on my part, however i now make a mental note to always make a proper note of the new guys name.
Perhaps its would be best to take a similar approach, if you have a team meeting, bring it up in the meeting and indicate that it is affecting clients. Also ensure that managers are aware that it has become an issue. Once clients are affected it should be regarded as serious.
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
0
down vote
I'd suggest taking a humorous tact. Make a "My Name Is" card with your photo (a funny one would likely be best), and the name you'd like to be known by. Print this out on something sturdy that can be placed on a desk, and hand them to everyone with whom you work regularly that gets your name wrong.
Hand this out in person, you can explain it as "Some clients have been really confused due to people messing up my name - here is something to help you remember."
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
Most answers here are way too aggressive. You should correct the error but in a calm and easy going manner. Just reply-all with:
Jill Bloggs?
Be sure that your email signature has your full name in it and you are done.
2
Playing dumb doesn't help. The manager is incorrect. Playing dumb results in the manager being incorrect and confused, making the situation worse, not better. Correcting somebody's mistake is not an inherently aggressive act.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:49
2
Because passive aggressive is better than just straight aggressive?
â IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 22 '14 at 16:43
This is a clever answer.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:16
1
@ReallyTiredOfThisGame â I see nothing aggressive in this answer.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:17
@NicolasBarbulesco - This answer is in the a form that would be considered passive aggressive, by pretending not to know that a slight has been given instead pretending to think they are talking about someone else.
â IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 23 '14 at 23:09
suggest improvements |Â
protected by Elysian Fields⦠Aug 22 '14 at 15:13
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
65
down vote
accepted
This carelessness about your name has gone from affecting just you to affecting your firm's business. So it has gone from just rude to entirely unacceptable.
When someone gets your name wrong, you should immediately intervene, using the medium in which the error was made, saying:
With respect, my name is Jane Doe, not Jill Bloggs.
If the error is made over email, you should do it, with a reply-all, like this:
On Tuesday, Joe Mgr wrote:
We are assigning Ian Smith and Jill Bloggs to the TPS account.
Joe:
With respect, my name is Jane Doe, not Jill Bloggs. You may recall that the
people at Acme Rocket Sleds were annoyed by this confusion over my name.
I would appreciate your use of my correct name.
If the error is made in person, speak up right away.
You might even go for the over-the-top humorous approach, and wear a large tag for a few days saying "Hello, my name is Jane Doe."
In any case it's wise, and by no means offensive, for you to be assertive about correcting this. What's at stake? Your good name!
2
Just want to add that you need to do it with the correct tone and attitude, you are just clarifying in polite manner.
â BlueTrin
Aug 22 '14 at 9:50
7
I agree with the answer, but would like to point out one point. I wouldn't answer to all. If I understood your answer correctly there are only a small number of people "mixing-up" the names. By answering to all you publicly humiliate your superior with no obvious upside. By giving him the possibility that this was a mistake you let him keep his face. By quoting the serious incident you remind him however that this behavior is not acceptable for you.
â magu_
Aug 22 '14 at 15:10
1
@magu I would say as this problem has been a constant. reply-all is still inappropriate, but after a few one-on-one attempts to correct it fail. It's fair to respond in this manner with whomever their supervisor is. (As far as the project goes... if it's actual assignments then it is fair to reply to all and say "The task is assigned to Jane Doo, there is no Jull Bloggs here"
â RualStorge
Aug 22 '14 at 18:19
This is a sensible answer. Except that I would send the e-mail reply to the sender rather than to all.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 18:54
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
65
down vote
accepted
This carelessness about your name has gone from affecting just you to affecting your firm's business. So it has gone from just rude to entirely unacceptable.
When someone gets your name wrong, you should immediately intervene, using the medium in which the error was made, saying:
With respect, my name is Jane Doe, not Jill Bloggs.
If the error is made over email, you should do it, with a reply-all, like this:
On Tuesday, Joe Mgr wrote:
We are assigning Ian Smith and Jill Bloggs to the TPS account.
Joe:
With respect, my name is Jane Doe, not Jill Bloggs. You may recall that the
people at Acme Rocket Sleds were annoyed by this confusion over my name.
I would appreciate your use of my correct name.
If the error is made in person, speak up right away.
You might even go for the over-the-top humorous approach, and wear a large tag for a few days saying "Hello, my name is Jane Doe."
In any case it's wise, and by no means offensive, for you to be assertive about correcting this. What's at stake? Your good name!
2
Just want to add that you need to do it with the correct tone and attitude, you are just clarifying in polite manner.
â BlueTrin
Aug 22 '14 at 9:50
7
I agree with the answer, but would like to point out one point. I wouldn't answer to all. If I understood your answer correctly there are only a small number of people "mixing-up" the names. By answering to all you publicly humiliate your superior with no obvious upside. By giving him the possibility that this was a mistake you let him keep his face. By quoting the serious incident you remind him however that this behavior is not acceptable for you.
â magu_
Aug 22 '14 at 15:10
1
@magu I would say as this problem has been a constant. reply-all is still inappropriate, but after a few one-on-one attempts to correct it fail. It's fair to respond in this manner with whomever their supervisor is. (As far as the project goes... if it's actual assignments then it is fair to reply to all and say "The task is assigned to Jane Doo, there is no Jull Bloggs here"
â RualStorge
Aug 22 '14 at 18:19
This is a sensible answer. Except that I would send the e-mail reply to the sender rather than to all.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 18:54
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
65
down vote
accepted
up vote
65
down vote
accepted
This carelessness about your name has gone from affecting just you to affecting your firm's business. So it has gone from just rude to entirely unacceptable.
When someone gets your name wrong, you should immediately intervene, using the medium in which the error was made, saying:
With respect, my name is Jane Doe, not Jill Bloggs.
If the error is made over email, you should do it, with a reply-all, like this:
On Tuesday, Joe Mgr wrote:
We are assigning Ian Smith and Jill Bloggs to the TPS account.
Joe:
With respect, my name is Jane Doe, not Jill Bloggs. You may recall that the
people at Acme Rocket Sleds were annoyed by this confusion over my name.
I would appreciate your use of my correct name.
If the error is made in person, speak up right away.
You might even go for the over-the-top humorous approach, and wear a large tag for a few days saying "Hello, my name is Jane Doe."
In any case it's wise, and by no means offensive, for you to be assertive about correcting this. What's at stake? Your good name!
This carelessness about your name has gone from affecting just you to affecting your firm's business. So it has gone from just rude to entirely unacceptable.
When someone gets your name wrong, you should immediately intervene, using the medium in which the error was made, saying:
With respect, my name is Jane Doe, not Jill Bloggs.
If the error is made over email, you should do it, with a reply-all, like this:
On Tuesday, Joe Mgr wrote:
We are assigning Ian Smith and Jill Bloggs to the TPS account.
Joe:
With respect, my name is Jane Doe, not Jill Bloggs. You may recall that the
people at Acme Rocket Sleds were annoyed by this confusion over my name.
I would appreciate your use of my correct name.
If the error is made in person, speak up right away.
You might even go for the over-the-top humorous approach, and wear a large tag for a few days saying "Hello, my name is Jane Doe."
In any case it's wise, and by no means offensive, for you to be assertive about correcting this. What's at stake? Your good name!
answered Aug 21 '14 at 13:46
O. Jones
13.6k24070
13.6k24070
2
Just want to add that you need to do it with the correct tone and attitude, you are just clarifying in polite manner.
â BlueTrin
Aug 22 '14 at 9:50
7
I agree with the answer, but would like to point out one point. I wouldn't answer to all. If I understood your answer correctly there are only a small number of people "mixing-up" the names. By answering to all you publicly humiliate your superior with no obvious upside. By giving him the possibility that this was a mistake you let him keep his face. By quoting the serious incident you remind him however that this behavior is not acceptable for you.
â magu_
Aug 22 '14 at 15:10
1
@magu I would say as this problem has been a constant. reply-all is still inappropriate, but after a few one-on-one attempts to correct it fail. It's fair to respond in this manner with whomever their supervisor is. (As far as the project goes... if it's actual assignments then it is fair to reply to all and say "The task is assigned to Jane Doo, there is no Jull Bloggs here"
â RualStorge
Aug 22 '14 at 18:19
This is a sensible answer. Except that I would send the e-mail reply to the sender rather than to all.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 18:54
suggest improvements |Â
2
Just want to add that you need to do it with the correct tone and attitude, you are just clarifying in polite manner.
â BlueTrin
Aug 22 '14 at 9:50
7
I agree with the answer, but would like to point out one point. I wouldn't answer to all. If I understood your answer correctly there are only a small number of people "mixing-up" the names. By answering to all you publicly humiliate your superior with no obvious upside. By giving him the possibility that this was a mistake you let him keep his face. By quoting the serious incident you remind him however that this behavior is not acceptable for you.
â magu_
Aug 22 '14 at 15:10
1
@magu I would say as this problem has been a constant. reply-all is still inappropriate, but after a few one-on-one attempts to correct it fail. It's fair to respond in this manner with whomever their supervisor is. (As far as the project goes... if it's actual assignments then it is fair to reply to all and say "The task is assigned to Jane Doo, there is no Jull Bloggs here"
â RualStorge
Aug 22 '14 at 18:19
This is a sensible answer. Except that I would send the e-mail reply to the sender rather than to all.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 18:54
2
2
Just want to add that you need to do it with the correct tone and attitude, you are just clarifying in polite manner.
â BlueTrin
Aug 22 '14 at 9:50
Just want to add that you need to do it with the correct tone and attitude, you are just clarifying in polite manner.
â BlueTrin
Aug 22 '14 at 9:50
7
7
I agree with the answer, but would like to point out one point. I wouldn't answer to all. If I understood your answer correctly there are only a small number of people "mixing-up" the names. By answering to all you publicly humiliate your superior with no obvious upside. By giving him the possibility that this was a mistake you let him keep his face. By quoting the serious incident you remind him however that this behavior is not acceptable for you.
â magu_
Aug 22 '14 at 15:10
I agree with the answer, but would like to point out one point. I wouldn't answer to all. If I understood your answer correctly there are only a small number of people "mixing-up" the names. By answering to all you publicly humiliate your superior with no obvious upside. By giving him the possibility that this was a mistake you let him keep his face. By quoting the serious incident you remind him however that this behavior is not acceptable for you.
â magu_
Aug 22 '14 at 15:10
1
1
@magu I would say as this problem has been a constant. reply-all is still inappropriate, but after a few one-on-one attempts to correct it fail. It's fair to respond in this manner with whomever their supervisor is. (As far as the project goes... if it's actual assignments then it is fair to reply to all and say "The task is assigned to Jane Doo, there is no Jull Bloggs here"
â RualStorge
Aug 22 '14 at 18:19
@magu I would say as this problem has been a constant. reply-all is still inappropriate, but after a few one-on-one attempts to correct it fail. It's fair to respond in this manner with whomever their supervisor is. (As far as the project goes... if it's actual assignments then it is fair to reply to all and say "The task is assigned to Jane Doo, there is no Jull Bloggs here"
â RualStorge
Aug 22 '14 at 18:19
This is a sensible answer. Except that I would send the e-mail reply to the sender rather than to all.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 18:54
This is a sensible answer. Except that I would send the e-mail reply to the sender rather than to all.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 18:54
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
12
down vote
I think a lot of the other answers sound too aggressive for my tastes, especially if this has been going on for a couple years and just now you stir up a big fuss about it.
I would just casually notify everyone of the issue with the client and ask that everyone call you by your specific name so that there aren't any more issues like that. I'd imagine that most people would find the situation humorous, and that would help them remember.
1
I think the problem is that if it had been every week I would have already done something about it. The fact it crops up maybe once every couple of months means that I tend to just shrug it off as somebody having a busy day and getting mixed up. It's then all good for another couple of months at which point it happens again.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:59
5
Bringing up the issue in front of the client is NOT a good way to handle it - your company needs to be on the same page prior to bringing in a client - you don't want to person to say "Oh really? THAT'S your name?" in front of a client, so don't give them the opportunity - plan it out as best you can internally first. Surprising a senior person in front of a client is a very aggressive move, and one that will almost always backfire.
â user2813274
Aug 21 '14 at 15:03
4
@user2813274 I am not suggesting to bring it up in front of the client, just to remind everyone what happened with the client...
â Kik
Aug 21 '14 at 15:04
1
@user2813274 I'm not sure that was what was being suggested to be honest.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 15:05
1
Humour's definitely a good way to go: good natured embarrassment is memorable without harming relationships. How about a "Jill Jar" (like a "swear jar") where anybody who says your wrong name has to put in, say, £2, which goes towards a team social fund or charity?
â user568458
Aug 21 '14 at 16:01
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
12
down vote
I think a lot of the other answers sound too aggressive for my tastes, especially if this has been going on for a couple years and just now you stir up a big fuss about it.
I would just casually notify everyone of the issue with the client and ask that everyone call you by your specific name so that there aren't any more issues like that. I'd imagine that most people would find the situation humorous, and that would help them remember.
1
I think the problem is that if it had been every week I would have already done something about it. The fact it crops up maybe once every couple of months means that I tend to just shrug it off as somebody having a busy day and getting mixed up. It's then all good for another couple of months at which point it happens again.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:59
5
Bringing up the issue in front of the client is NOT a good way to handle it - your company needs to be on the same page prior to bringing in a client - you don't want to person to say "Oh really? THAT'S your name?" in front of a client, so don't give them the opportunity - plan it out as best you can internally first. Surprising a senior person in front of a client is a very aggressive move, and one that will almost always backfire.
â user2813274
Aug 21 '14 at 15:03
4
@user2813274 I am not suggesting to bring it up in front of the client, just to remind everyone what happened with the client...
â Kik
Aug 21 '14 at 15:04
1
@user2813274 I'm not sure that was what was being suggested to be honest.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 15:05
1
Humour's definitely a good way to go: good natured embarrassment is memorable without harming relationships. How about a "Jill Jar" (like a "swear jar") where anybody who says your wrong name has to put in, say, £2, which goes towards a team social fund or charity?
â user568458
Aug 21 '14 at 16:01
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
12
down vote
up vote
12
down vote
I think a lot of the other answers sound too aggressive for my tastes, especially if this has been going on for a couple years and just now you stir up a big fuss about it.
I would just casually notify everyone of the issue with the client and ask that everyone call you by your specific name so that there aren't any more issues like that. I'd imagine that most people would find the situation humorous, and that would help them remember.
I think a lot of the other answers sound too aggressive for my tastes, especially if this has been going on for a couple years and just now you stir up a big fuss about it.
I would just casually notify everyone of the issue with the client and ask that everyone call you by your specific name so that there aren't any more issues like that. I'd imagine that most people would find the situation humorous, and that would help them remember.
answered Aug 21 '14 at 14:53
Kik
32037
32037
1
I think the problem is that if it had been every week I would have already done something about it. The fact it crops up maybe once every couple of months means that I tend to just shrug it off as somebody having a busy day and getting mixed up. It's then all good for another couple of months at which point it happens again.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:59
5
Bringing up the issue in front of the client is NOT a good way to handle it - your company needs to be on the same page prior to bringing in a client - you don't want to person to say "Oh really? THAT'S your name?" in front of a client, so don't give them the opportunity - plan it out as best you can internally first. Surprising a senior person in front of a client is a very aggressive move, and one that will almost always backfire.
â user2813274
Aug 21 '14 at 15:03
4
@user2813274 I am not suggesting to bring it up in front of the client, just to remind everyone what happened with the client...
â Kik
Aug 21 '14 at 15:04
1
@user2813274 I'm not sure that was what was being suggested to be honest.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 15:05
1
Humour's definitely a good way to go: good natured embarrassment is memorable without harming relationships. How about a "Jill Jar" (like a "swear jar") where anybody who says your wrong name has to put in, say, £2, which goes towards a team social fund or charity?
â user568458
Aug 21 '14 at 16:01
 |Â
show 2 more comments
1
I think the problem is that if it had been every week I would have already done something about it. The fact it crops up maybe once every couple of months means that I tend to just shrug it off as somebody having a busy day and getting mixed up. It's then all good for another couple of months at which point it happens again.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:59
5
Bringing up the issue in front of the client is NOT a good way to handle it - your company needs to be on the same page prior to bringing in a client - you don't want to person to say "Oh really? THAT'S your name?" in front of a client, so don't give them the opportunity - plan it out as best you can internally first. Surprising a senior person in front of a client is a very aggressive move, and one that will almost always backfire.
â user2813274
Aug 21 '14 at 15:03
4
@user2813274 I am not suggesting to bring it up in front of the client, just to remind everyone what happened with the client...
â Kik
Aug 21 '14 at 15:04
1
@user2813274 I'm not sure that was what was being suggested to be honest.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 15:05
1
Humour's definitely a good way to go: good natured embarrassment is memorable without harming relationships. How about a "Jill Jar" (like a "swear jar") where anybody who says your wrong name has to put in, say, £2, which goes towards a team social fund or charity?
â user568458
Aug 21 '14 at 16:01
1
1
I think the problem is that if it had been every week I would have already done something about it. The fact it crops up maybe once every couple of months means that I tend to just shrug it off as somebody having a busy day and getting mixed up. It's then all good for another couple of months at which point it happens again.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:59
I think the problem is that if it had been every week I would have already done something about it. The fact it crops up maybe once every couple of months means that I tend to just shrug it off as somebody having a busy day and getting mixed up. It's then all good for another couple of months at which point it happens again.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:59
5
5
Bringing up the issue in front of the client is NOT a good way to handle it - your company needs to be on the same page prior to bringing in a client - you don't want to person to say "Oh really? THAT'S your name?" in front of a client, so don't give them the opportunity - plan it out as best you can internally first. Surprising a senior person in front of a client is a very aggressive move, and one that will almost always backfire.
â user2813274
Aug 21 '14 at 15:03
Bringing up the issue in front of the client is NOT a good way to handle it - your company needs to be on the same page prior to bringing in a client - you don't want to person to say "Oh really? THAT'S your name?" in front of a client, so don't give them the opportunity - plan it out as best you can internally first. Surprising a senior person in front of a client is a very aggressive move, and one that will almost always backfire.
â user2813274
Aug 21 '14 at 15:03
4
4
@user2813274 I am not suggesting to bring it up in front of the client, just to remind everyone what happened with the client...
â Kik
Aug 21 '14 at 15:04
@user2813274 I am not suggesting to bring it up in front of the client, just to remind everyone what happened with the client...
â Kik
Aug 21 '14 at 15:04
1
1
@user2813274 I'm not sure that was what was being suggested to be honest.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 15:05
@user2813274 I'm not sure that was what was being suggested to be honest.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 15:05
1
1
Humour's definitely a good way to go: good natured embarrassment is memorable without harming relationships. How about a "Jill Jar" (like a "swear jar") where anybody who says your wrong name has to put in, say, £2, which goes towards a team social fund or charity?
â user568458
Aug 21 '14 at 16:01
Humour's definitely a good way to go: good natured embarrassment is memorable without harming relationships. How about a "Jill Jar" (like a "swear jar") where anybody who says your wrong name has to put in, say, £2, which goes towards a team social fund or charity?
â user568458
Aug 21 '14 at 16:01
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
10
down vote
I would remind the sender of such an e-mail immediately after I recognize their error. You could for example write back:
"I would like to kindly remind you that my name is Jane Doe, and not Jill Bloggs, as you have written. Please do your best to get my name right from now on. Spelling my name wrong has already led to misunderstandigs with a client once. Please help to avoid this."
If you have the opportunity, talk directly to this person, instead of or in addition to the e-mail.
You could consider "accidently " misspelling" or pronouncing the persons that has done this name in an internal meeting to make a point
â Pepone
Aug 21 '14 at 14:06
13
@Pepone I think that would very much depend on your relationship with the person involved. I would be uncomfortable coming across as too aggressive or rude with somebody senior than me.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:07
@Ilythya: professionalism is a word that gets thrown around a lot, but fundamentally it means 'doing your job'. if clients are affected by this and you don't take action because you are worried about being offensive then you are being unprofessional by neglecting your duties for personal reasons. likewise for someone senior to take offense and do anything about it is unprofessional of them for the same reason... or in short: if everyone just does their job at the most basic level this shouldn't even be a concern.
â jheriko
Aug 21 '14 at 22:04
@Ilythya You don't have to be aggressive or offensive to correct somebody's mistake. I know you mostly shrug it off and that's great. But remember that if anyone has the right to be offended, it's you.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:52
1
@jheriko As far as the client was concerned I hadn't noticed (not having been part of any discussions) until I showed up on the day to see their confused and slightly upset faces. Obviously when I got back to the office I raised it, although by that time the damage was done.
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 10:27
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
10
down vote
I would remind the sender of such an e-mail immediately after I recognize their error. You could for example write back:
"I would like to kindly remind you that my name is Jane Doe, and not Jill Bloggs, as you have written. Please do your best to get my name right from now on. Spelling my name wrong has already led to misunderstandigs with a client once. Please help to avoid this."
If you have the opportunity, talk directly to this person, instead of or in addition to the e-mail.
You could consider "accidently " misspelling" or pronouncing the persons that has done this name in an internal meeting to make a point
â Pepone
Aug 21 '14 at 14:06
13
@Pepone I think that would very much depend on your relationship with the person involved. I would be uncomfortable coming across as too aggressive or rude with somebody senior than me.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:07
@Ilythya: professionalism is a word that gets thrown around a lot, but fundamentally it means 'doing your job'. if clients are affected by this and you don't take action because you are worried about being offensive then you are being unprofessional by neglecting your duties for personal reasons. likewise for someone senior to take offense and do anything about it is unprofessional of them for the same reason... or in short: if everyone just does their job at the most basic level this shouldn't even be a concern.
â jheriko
Aug 21 '14 at 22:04
@Ilythya You don't have to be aggressive or offensive to correct somebody's mistake. I know you mostly shrug it off and that's great. But remember that if anyone has the right to be offended, it's you.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:52
1
@jheriko As far as the client was concerned I hadn't noticed (not having been part of any discussions) until I showed up on the day to see their confused and slightly upset faces. Obviously when I got back to the office I raised it, although by that time the damage was done.
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 10:27
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
10
down vote
up vote
10
down vote
I would remind the sender of such an e-mail immediately after I recognize their error. You could for example write back:
"I would like to kindly remind you that my name is Jane Doe, and not Jill Bloggs, as you have written. Please do your best to get my name right from now on. Spelling my name wrong has already led to misunderstandigs with a client once. Please help to avoid this."
If you have the opportunity, talk directly to this person, instead of or in addition to the e-mail.
I would remind the sender of such an e-mail immediately after I recognize their error. You could for example write back:
"I would like to kindly remind you that my name is Jane Doe, and not Jill Bloggs, as you have written. Please do your best to get my name right from now on. Spelling my name wrong has already led to misunderstandigs with a client once. Please help to avoid this."
If you have the opportunity, talk directly to this person, instead of or in addition to the e-mail.
answered Aug 21 '14 at 13:43
prockel
1,075613
1,075613
You could consider "accidently " misspelling" or pronouncing the persons that has done this name in an internal meeting to make a point
â Pepone
Aug 21 '14 at 14:06
13
@Pepone I think that would very much depend on your relationship with the person involved. I would be uncomfortable coming across as too aggressive or rude with somebody senior than me.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:07
@Ilythya: professionalism is a word that gets thrown around a lot, but fundamentally it means 'doing your job'. if clients are affected by this and you don't take action because you are worried about being offensive then you are being unprofessional by neglecting your duties for personal reasons. likewise for someone senior to take offense and do anything about it is unprofessional of them for the same reason... or in short: if everyone just does their job at the most basic level this shouldn't even be a concern.
â jheriko
Aug 21 '14 at 22:04
@Ilythya You don't have to be aggressive or offensive to correct somebody's mistake. I know you mostly shrug it off and that's great. But remember that if anyone has the right to be offended, it's you.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:52
1
@jheriko As far as the client was concerned I hadn't noticed (not having been part of any discussions) until I showed up on the day to see their confused and slightly upset faces. Obviously when I got back to the office I raised it, although by that time the damage was done.
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 10:27
suggest improvements |Â
You could consider "accidently " misspelling" or pronouncing the persons that has done this name in an internal meeting to make a point
â Pepone
Aug 21 '14 at 14:06
13
@Pepone I think that would very much depend on your relationship with the person involved. I would be uncomfortable coming across as too aggressive or rude with somebody senior than me.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:07
@Ilythya: professionalism is a word that gets thrown around a lot, but fundamentally it means 'doing your job'. if clients are affected by this and you don't take action because you are worried about being offensive then you are being unprofessional by neglecting your duties for personal reasons. likewise for someone senior to take offense and do anything about it is unprofessional of them for the same reason... or in short: if everyone just does their job at the most basic level this shouldn't even be a concern.
â jheriko
Aug 21 '14 at 22:04
@Ilythya You don't have to be aggressive or offensive to correct somebody's mistake. I know you mostly shrug it off and that's great. But remember that if anyone has the right to be offended, it's you.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:52
1
@jheriko As far as the client was concerned I hadn't noticed (not having been part of any discussions) until I showed up on the day to see their confused and slightly upset faces. Obviously when I got back to the office I raised it, although by that time the damage was done.
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 10:27
You could consider "accidently " misspelling" or pronouncing the persons that has done this name in an internal meeting to make a point
â Pepone
Aug 21 '14 at 14:06
You could consider "accidently " misspelling" or pronouncing the persons that has done this name in an internal meeting to make a point
â Pepone
Aug 21 '14 at 14:06
13
13
@Pepone I think that would very much depend on your relationship with the person involved. I would be uncomfortable coming across as too aggressive or rude with somebody senior than me.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:07
@Pepone I think that would very much depend on your relationship with the person involved. I would be uncomfortable coming across as too aggressive or rude with somebody senior than me.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:07
@Ilythya: professionalism is a word that gets thrown around a lot, but fundamentally it means 'doing your job'. if clients are affected by this and you don't take action because you are worried about being offensive then you are being unprofessional by neglecting your duties for personal reasons. likewise for someone senior to take offense and do anything about it is unprofessional of them for the same reason... or in short: if everyone just does their job at the most basic level this shouldn't even be a concern.
â jheriko
Aug 21 '14 at 22:04
@Ilythya: professionalism is a word that gets thrown around a lot, but fundamentally it means 'doing your job'. if clients are affected by this and you don't take action because you are worried about being offensive then you are being unprofessional by neglecting your duties for personal reasons. likewise for someone senior to take offense and do anything about it is unprofessional of them for the same reason... or in short: if everyone just does their job at the most basic level this shouldn't even be a concern.
â jheriko
Aug 21 '14 at 22:04
@Ilythya You don't have to be aggressive or offensive to correct somebody's mistake. I know you mostly shrug it off and that's great. But remember that if anyone has the right to be offended, it's you.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:52
@Ilythya You don't have to be aggressive or offensive to correct somebody's mistake. I know you mostly shrug it off and that's great. But remember that if anyone has the right to be offended, it's you.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:52
1
1
@jheriko As far as the client was concerned I hadn't noticed (not having been part of any discussions) until I showed up on the day to see their confused and slightly upset faces. Obviously when I got back to the office I raised it, although by that time the damage was done.
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 10:27
@jheriko As far as the client was concerned I hadn't noticed (not having been part of any discussions) until I showed up on the day to see their confused and slightly upset faces. Obviously when I got back to the office I raised it, although by that time the damage was done.
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 10:27
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
2
down vote
I would forward the client's e-mail that requests Jill Bloggs to the person who sent it originally, and ask them who this Jill Bloggs person is.
This is a misunderstanding that was created by the senior colleague, and thus should be resolved by them. You have done your part by bringing it up to them - you could even suggest hiring in the next person named "Jill Bloggs" to do the job and keep the customer happy.
3
@Ilythya asked about "gently reminding people what her name is". Your answer does not really answer her question, does it? And it's not a very gentle approach.
â prockel
Aug 21 '14 at 14:54
2
@prockel - an internal e-mail is just about the gentlest way possible - the thing is that this has been an ongoing issue, and anything less is likely to be ignored and ineffective. Physical interactions were mentioned as difficult to pull off, and an e-mail to the client is necessary, but not from the OP.
â user2813274
Aug 21 '14 at 15:00
This is not constructive. Jane Doe knows full well that the name "Jill Bloggs" is being used to refer to her so she should just correct the mistake. Playing dumb about it just causes confusion.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:45
@DavidRicherby only alternatives is to say nothing and just let them get on with calling you that, or to ignore anything addressed to that name and probably lose your job over it.
â jwenting
Aug 22 '14 at 9:58
@DavidRicherby I didn't realise that I was being called Jill Bloggs until I turned up at the client's office. Given the vast array of different names I've been assigned, it's often impossible to tell that one is supposed to refer to me until it's too late.
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 12:16
 |Â
show 3 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
I would forward the client's e-mail that requests Jill Bloggs to the person who sent it originally, and ask them who this Jill Bloggs person is.
This is a misunderstanding that was created by the senior colleague, and thus should be resolved by them. You have done your part by bringing it up to them - you could even suggest hiring in the next person named "Jill Bloggs" to do the job and keep the customer happy.
3
@Ilythya asked about "gently reminding people what her name is". Your answer does not really answer her question, does it? And it's not a very gentle approach.
â prockel
Aug 21 '14 at 14:54
2
@prockel - an internal e-mail is just about the gentlest way possible - the thing is that this has been an ongoing issue, and anything less is likely to be ignored and ineffective. Physical interactions were mentioned as difficult to pull off, and an e-mail to the client is necessary, but not from the OP.
â user2813274
Aug 21 '14 at 15:00
This is not constructive. Jane Doe knows full well that the name "Jill Bloggs" is being used to refer to her so she should just correct the mistake. Playing dumb about it just causes confusion.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:45
@DavidRicherby only alternatives is to say nothing and just let them get on with calling you that, or to ignore anything addressed to that name and probably lose your job over it.
â jwenting
Aug 22 '14 at 9:58
@DavidRicherby I didn't realise that I was being called Jill Bloggs until I turned up at the client's office. Given the vast array of different names I've been assigned, it's often impossible to tell that one is supposed to refer to me until it's too late.
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 12:16
 |Â
show 3 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
I would forward the client's e-mail that requests Jill Bloggs to the person who sent it originally, and ask them who this Jill Bloggs person is.
This is a misunderstanding that was created by the senior colleague, and thus should be resolved by them. You have done your part by bringing it up to them - you could even suggest hiring in the next person named "Jill Bloggs" to do the job and keep the customer happy.
I would forward the client's e-mail that requests Jill Bloggs to the person who sent it originally, and ask them who this Jill Bloggs person is.
This is a misunderstanding that was created by the senior colleague, and thus should be resolved by them. You have done your part by bringing it up to them - you could even suggest hiring in the next person named "Jill Bloggs" to do the job and keep the customer happy.
answered Aug 21 '14 at 13:57
user2813274
1,01021022
1,01021022
3
@Ilythya asked about "gently reminding people what her name is". Your answer does not really answer her question, does it? And it's not a very gentle approach.
â prockel
Aug 21 '14 at 14:54
2
@prockel - an internal e-mail is just about the gentlest way possible - the thing is that this has been an ongoing issue, and anything less is likely to be ignored and ineffective. Physical interactions were mentioned as difficult to pull off, and an e-mail to the client is necessary, but not from the OP.
â user2813274
Aug 21 '14 at 15:00
This is not constructive. Jane Doe knows full well that the name "Jill Bloggs" is being used to refer to her so she should just correct the mistake. Playing dumb about it just causes confusion.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:45
@DavidRicherby only alternatives is to say nothing and just let them get on with calling you that, or to ignore anything addressed to that name and probably lose your job over it.
â jwenting
Aug 22 '14 at 9:58
@DavidRicherby I didn't realise that I was being called Jill Bloggs until I turned up at the client's office. Given the vast array of different names I've been assigned, it's often impossible to tell that one is supposed to refer to me until it's too late.
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 12:16
 |Â
show 3 more comments
3
@Ilythya asked about "gently reminding people what her name is". Your answer does not really answer her question, does it? And it's not a very gentle approach.
â prockel
Aug 21 '14 at 14:54
2
@prockel - an internal e-mail is just about the gentlest way possible - the thing is that this has been an ongoing issue, and anything less is likely to be ignored and ineffective. Physical interactions were mentioned as difficult to pull off, and an e-mail to the client is necessary, but not from the OP.
â user2813274
Aug 21 '14 at 15:00
This is not constructive. Jane Doe knows full well that the name "Jill Bloggs" is being used to refer to her so she should just correct the mistake. Playing dumb about it just causes confusion.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:45
@DavidRicherby only alternatives is to say nothing and just let them get on with calling you that, or to ignore anything addressed to that name and probably lose your job over it.
â jwenting
Aug 22 '14 at 9:58
@DavidRicherby I didn't realise that I was being called Jill Bloggs until I turned up at the client's office. Given the vast array of different names I've been assigned, it's often impossible to tell that one is supposed to refer to me until it's too late.
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 12:16
3
3
@Ilythya asked about "gently reminding people what her name is". Your answer does not really answer her question, does it? And it's not a very gentle approach.
â prockel
Aug 21 '14 at 14:54
@Ilythya asked about "gently reminding people what her name is". Your answer does not really answer her question, does it? And it's not a very gentle approach.
â prockel
Aug 21 '14 at 14:54
2
2
@prockel - an internal e-mail is just about the gentlest way possible - the thing is that this has been an ongoing issue, and anything less is likely to be ignored and ineffective. Physical interactions were mentioned as difficult to pull off, and an e-mail to the client is necessary, but not from the OP.
â user2813274
Aug 21 '14 at 15:00
@prockel - an internal e-mail is just about the gentlest way possible - the thing is that this has been an ongoing issue, and anything less is likely to be ignored and ineffective. Physical interactions were mentioned as difficult to pull off, and an e-mail to the client is necessary, but not from the OP.
â user2813274
Aug 21 '14 at 15:00
This is not constructive. Jane Doe knows full well that the name "Jill Bloggs" is being used to refer to her so she should just correct the mistake. Playing dumb about it just causes confusion.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:45
This is not constructive. Jane Doe knows full well that the name "Jill Bloggs" is being used to refer to her so she should just correct the mistake. Playing dumb about it just causes confusion.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:45
@DavidRicherby only alternatives is to say nothing and just let them get on with calling you that, or to ignore anything addressed to that name and probably lose your job over it.
â jwenting
Aug 22 '14 at 9:58
@DavidRicherby only alternatives is to say nothing and just let them get on with calling you that, or to ignore anything addressed to that name and probably lose your job over it.
â jwenting
Aug 22 '14 at 9:58
@DavidRicherby I didn't realise that I was being called Jill Bloggs until I turned up at the client's office. Given the vast array of different names I've been assigned, it's often impossible to tell that one is supposed to refer to me until it's too late.
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 12:16
@DavidRicherby I didn't realise that I was being called Jill Bloggs until I turned up at the client's office. Given the vast array of different names I've been assigned, it's often impossible to tell that one is supposed to refer to me until it's too late.
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 12:16
 |Â
show 3 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
I am incredibly terrible at remembering names, mostly with new people I am working with on a team. I had a similar situation where I went to a customer and indicated that John Smith would be working on a customers project, when in fact it was George Doe.
Of course this also affected the customer, and as a result George Doe was upset etc. He contacted me via email and indicated that I had forgotten his name and had incorrectly introduced him to a customer, cc-ing my manager. Of course this was not intentional on my part, however i now make a mental note to always make a proper note of the new guys name.
Perhaps its would be best to take a similar approach, if you have a team meeting, bring it up in the meeting and indicate that it is affecting clients. Also ensure that managers are aware that it has become an issue. Once clients are affected it should be regarded as serious.
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
1
down vote
I am incredibly terrible at remembering names, mostly with new people I am working with on a team. I had a similar situation where I went to a customer and indicated that John Smith would be working on a customers project, when in fact it was George Doe.
Of course this also affected the customer, and as a result George Doe was upset etc. He contacted me via email and indicated that I had forgotten his name and had incorrectly introduced him to a customer, cc-ing my manager. Of course this was not intentional on my part, however i now make a mental note to always make a proper note of the new guys name.
Perhaps its would be best to take a similar approach, if you have a team meeting, bring it up in the meeting and indicate that it is affecting clients. Also ensure that managers are aware that it has become an issue. Once clients are affected it should be regarded as serious.
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
I am incredibly terrible at remembering names, mostly with new people I am working with on a team. I had a similar situation where I went to a customer and indicated that John Smith would be working on a customers project, when in fact it was George Doe.
Of course this also affected the customer, and as a result George Doe was upset etc. He contacted me via email and indicated that I had forgotten his name and had incorrectly introduced him to a customer, cc-ing my manager. Of course this was not intentional on my part, however i now make a mental note to always make a proper note of the new guys name.
Perhaps its would be best to take a similar approach, if you have a team meeting, bring it up in the meeting and indicate that it is affecting clients. Also ensure that managers are aware that it has become an issue. Once clients are affected it should be regarded as serious.
I am incredibly terrible at remembering names, mostly with new people I am working with on a team. I had a similar situation where I went to a customer and indicated that John Smith would be working on a customers project, when in fact it was George Doe.
Of course this also affected the customer, and as a result George Doe was upset etc. He contacted me via email and indicated that I had forgotten his name and had incorrectly introduced him to a customer, cc-ing my manager. Of course this was not intentional on my part, however i now make a mental note to always make a proper note of the new guys name.
Perhaps its would be best to take a similar approach, if you have a team meeting, bring it up in the meeting and indicate that it is affecting clients. Also ensure that managers are aware that it has become an issue. Once clients are affected it should be regarded as serious.
answered Aug 22 '14 at 11:31
NightshadowZA
393
393
suggest improvements |Â
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
0
down vote
I'd suggest taking a humorous tact. Make a "My Name Is" card with your photo (a funny one would likely be best), and the name you'd like to be known by. Print this out on something sturdy that can be placed on a desk, and hand them to everyone with whom you work regularly that gets your name wrong.
Hand this out in person, you can explain it as "Some clients have been really confused due to people messing up my name - here is something to help you remember."
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
0
down vote
I'd suggest taking a humorous tact. Make a "My Name Is" card with your photo (a funny one would likely be best), and the name you'd like to be known by. Print this out on something sturdy that can be placed on a desk, and hand them to everyone with whom you work regularly that gets your name wrong.
Hand this out in person, you can explain it as "Some clients have been really confused due to people messing up my name - here is something to help you remember."
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I'd suggest taking a humorous tact. Make a "My Name Is" card with your photo (a funny one would likely be best), and the name you'd like to be known by. Print this out on something sturdy that can be placed on a desk, and hand them to everyone with whom you work regularly that gets your name wrong.
Hand this out in person, you can explain it as "Some clients have been really confused due to people messing up my name - here is something to help you remember."
I'd suggest taking a humorous tact. Make a "My Name Is" card with your photo (a funny one would likely be best), and the name you'd like to be known by. Print this out on something sturdy that can be placed on a desk, and hand them to everyone with whom you work regularly that gets your name wrong.
Hand this out in person, you can explain it as "Some clients have been really confused due to people messing up my name - here is something to help you remember."
edited Aug 21 '14 at 17:46
answered Aug 21 '14 at 15:48
sevensevens
6,20321531
6,20321531
suggest improvements |Â
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
Most answers here are way too aggressive. You should correct the error but in a calm and easy going manner. Just reply-all with:
Jill Bloggs?
Be sure that your email signature has your full name in it and you are done.
2
Playing dumb doesn't help. The manager is incorrect. Playing dumb results in the manager being incorrect and confused, making the situation worse, not better. Correcting somebody's mistake is not an inherently aggressive act.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:49
2
Because passive aggressive is better than just straight aggressive?
â IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 22 '14 at 16:43
This is a clever answer.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:16
1
@ReallyTiredOfThisGame â I see nothing aggressive in this answer.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:17
@NicolasBarbulesco - This answer is in the a form that would be considered passive aggressive, by pretending not to know that a slight has been given instead pretending to think they are talking about someone else.
â IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 23 '14 at 23:09
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
Most answers here are way too aggressive. You should correct the error but in a calm and easy going manner. Just reply-all with:
Jill Bloggs?
Be sure that your email signature has your full name in it and you are done.
2
Playing dumb doesn't help. The manager is incorrect. Playing dumb results in the manager being incorrect and confused, making the situation worse, not better. Correcting somebody's mistake is not an inherently aggressive act.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:49
2
Because passive aggressive is better than just straight aggressive?
â IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 22 '14 at 16:43
This is a clever answer.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:16
1
@ReallyTiredOfThisGame â I see nothing aggressive in this answer.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:17
@NicolasBarbulesco - This answer is in the a form that would be considered passive aggressive, by pretending not to know that a slight has been given instead pretending to think they are talking about someone else.
â IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 23 '14 at 23:09
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
up vote
-1
down vote
Most answers here are way too aggressive. You should correct the error but in a calm and easy going manner. Just reply-all with:
Jill Bloggs?
Be sure that your email signature has your full name in it and you are done.
Most answers here are way too aggressive. You should correct the error but in a calm and easy going manner. Just reply-all with:
Jill Bloggs?
Be sure that your email signature has your full name in it and you are done.
answered Aug 21 '14 at 20:46
simbo
712
712
2
Playing dumb doesn't help. The manager is incorrect. Playing dumb results in the manager being incorrect and confused, making the situation worse, not better. Correcting somebody's mistake is not an inherently aggressive act.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:49
2
Because passive aggressive is better than just straight aggressive?
â IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 22 '14 at 16:43
This is a clever answer.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:16
1
@ReallyTiredOfThisGame â I see nothing aggressive in this answer.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:17
@NicolasBarbulesco - This answer is in the a form that would be considered passive aggressive, by pretending not to know that a slight has been given instead pretending to think they are talking about someone else.
â IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 23 '14 at 23:09
suggest improvements |Â
2
Playing dumb doesn't help. The manager is incorrect. Playing dumb results in the manager being incorrect and confused, making the situation worse, not better. Correcting somebody's mistake is not an inherently aggressive act.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:49
2
Because passive aggressive is better than just straight aggressive?
â IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 22 '14 at 16:43
This is a clever answer.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:16
1
@ReallyTiredOfThisGame â I see nothing aggressive in this answer.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:17
@NicolasBarbulesco - This answer is in the a form that would be considered passive aggressive, by pretending not to know that a slight has been given instead pretending to think they are talking about someone else.
â IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 23 '14 at 23:09
2
2
Playing dumb doesn't help. The manager is incorrect. Playing dumb results in the manager being incorrect and confused, making the situation worse, not better. Correcting somebody's mistake is not an inherently aggressive act.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:49
Playing dumb doesn't help. The manager is incorrect. Playing dumb results in the manager being incorrect and confused, making the situation worse, not better. Correcting somebody's mistake is not an inherently aggressive act.
â David Richerby
Aug 22 '14 at 8:49
2
2
Because passive aggressive is better than just straight aggressive?
â IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 22 '14 at 16:43
Because passive aggressive is better than just straight aggressive?
â IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 22 '14 at 16:43
This is a clever answer.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:16
This is a clever answer.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:16
1
1
@ReallyTiredOfThisGame â I see nothing aggressive in this answer.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:17
@ReallyTiredOfThisGame â I see nothing aggressive in this answer.
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:17
@NicolasBarbulesco - This answer is in the a form that would be considered passive aggressive, by pretending not to know that a slight has been given instead pretending to think they are talking about someone else.
â IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 23 '14 at 23:09
@NicolasBarbulesco - This answer is in the a form that would be considered passive aggressive, by pretending not to know that a slight has been given instead pretending to think they are talking about someone else.
â IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 23 '14 at 23:09
suggest improvements |Â
protected by Elysian Fields⦠Aug 22 '14 at 15:13
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
5
Was the responsible person aware of the problem it had caused to the client?? what was the reaction on that front
â Brandin
Aug 21 '14 at 14:42
1
@Brandin When it happened there was a bit of eye-rolling and a general air of "Silly client, can't he see that Jill Bloggs is similar to Jane Doe? It's obvious!!" Obviously the more sensible people involved just apologised to the client and explained there'd been a mix up but no other actions were actually taken.
â Ilythya
Aug 21 '14 at 14:57
@GrahamBorland If it helps, over the last couple of years I have been called Amanda, Ruth, Julia, Rebecca, Elizabeth and Sarah (none of which are my first name), with a mix of my actual surname and other common british names like Baker, Brown, etc. This isn't just mixing up something like Jo/Joanna/Joanne (also not my name).
â Ilythya
Aug 22 '14 at 10:24
3
Are you the only person this issue happens to or is it a more general problem?
â Martin Smith
Aug 23 '14 at 12:27
@Ilythya â At this point, have you considered officially changing your name to "Jill Bloggs" ?
â Nicolas Barbulesco
Aug 23 '14 at 19:12