Mixing
Third party employment : Good or Bad [closed]
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
-4
down vote
favorite
I have been working on payrolls of an IT giant. But my growth has been stalled here. I have got offer for a job via third party. Though they are paying me more but I am sceptical about third party payrolls. I asked that consultant(third party) and he said there is no problem regarding job security. Any views about the following will be helpful.
Is it ok to get employed via third party when your last two employments were on permanent company payrolls
Are people recruited via third party paid less?
salary new-job consultants
asked Aug 11 '14 at 15:32
cbinder
11615
closed as primarily opinion-based by gnat, Garrison Neely, IDrinkandIKnowThings, alroc, jcmeloni Aug 11 '14 at 20:56
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
-4
down vote
favorite
I have been working on payrolls of an IT giant. But my growth has been stalled here. I have got offer for a job via third party. Though they are paying me more but I am sceptical about third party payrolls. I asked that consultant(third party) and he said there is no problem regarding job security. Any views about the following will be helpful.
Is it ok to get employed via third party when your last two employments were on permanent company payrolls
Are people recruited via third party paid less?
salary new-job consultants
asked Aug 11 '14 at 15:32
cbinder
11615
closed as primarily opinion-based by gnat, Garrison Neely, IDrinkandIKnowThings, alroc, jcmeloni Aug 11 '14 at 20:56
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
If you want to be employeed by a third-party ( not sure what you mean by this ) then you should do it. You decide what is "ok" and "not ok" just understand any obligations that your decision creates. People are paid less for a varity of reasons all unique to the indivual getting paid less.
– Ramhound
Aug 11 '14 at 15:45
It means pay will be processed by a third party .
– cbinder
Aug 11 '14 at 16:08
This question appears to be off-topic because it is about a poll on workplaces which is off topic per help center
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 11 '14 at 16:17
Hi cbinder. Welcome to The Workplace. Speculative questions aren't really what we do here; instead, we try to focus on questions that can be answered more objectively. Check out help center as well as How to Ask for further guidance. If you can edit this (or any of your other closed questions) to meet those guidelines, they'll get bumped into our reopen review queue. If you're new to our site, you might also take the tour. Hope this helps.
– jmort253♦
Aug 13 '14 at 4:05
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
-4
down vote
favorite
up vote
-4
down vote
favorite
I have been working on payrolls of an IT giant. But my growth has been stalled here. I have got offer for a job via third party. Though they are paying me more but I am sceptical about third party payrolls. I asked that consultant(third party) and he said there is no problem regarding job security. Any views about the following will be helpful.
Is it ok to get employed via third party when your last two employments were on permanent company payrolls
Are people recruited via third party paid less?
salary new-job consultants
asked Aug 11 '14 at 15:32
cbinder
11615
I have been working on payrolls of an IT giant. But my growth has been stalled here. I have got offer for a job via third party. Though they are paying me more but I am sceptical about third party payrolls. I asked that consultant(third party) and he said there is no problem regarding job security. Any views about the following will be helpful.
Is it ok to get employed via third party when your last two employments were on permanent company payrolls
Are people recruited via third party paid less?
salary new-job consultants
asked Aug 11 '14 at 15:32
cbinder
11615
asked Aug 11 '14 at 15:32
cbinder
11615
asked Aug 11 '14 at 15:32
cbinder
11615
asked Aug 11 '14 at 15:32
cbinder
11615
11615
closed as primarily opinion-based by gnat, Garrison Neely, IDrinkandIKnowThings, alroc, jcmeloni Aug 11 '14 at 20:56
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as primarily opinion-based by gnat, Garrison Neely, IDrinkandIKnowThings, alroc, jcmeloni Aug 11 '14 at 20:56
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
If you want to be employeed by a third-party ( not sure what you mean by this ) then you should do it. You decide what is "ok" and "not ok" just understand any obligations that your decision creates. People are paid less for a varity of reasons all unique to the indivual getting paid less.
– Ramhound
Aug 11 '14 at 15:45
It means pay will be processed by a third party .
– cbinder
Aug 11 '14 at 16:08
This question appears to be off-topic because it is about a poll on workplaces which is off topic per help center
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 11 '14 at 16:17
Hi cbinder. Welcome to The Workplace. Speculative questions aren't really what we do here; instead, we try to focus on questions that can be answered more objectively. Check out help center as well as How to Ask for further guidance. If you can edit this (or any of your other closed questions) to meet those guidelines, they'll get bumped into our reopen review queue. If you're new to our site, you might also take the tour. Hope this helps.
– jmort253♦
Aug 13 '14 at 4:05
suggest improvements |Â
If you want to be employeed by a third-party ( not sure what you mean by this ) then you should do it. You decide what is "ok" and "not ok" just understand any obligations that your decision creates. People are paid less for a varity of reasons all unique to the indivual getting paid less.
– Ramhound
Aug 11 '14 at 15:45
It means pay will be processed by a third party .
– cbinder
Aug 11 '14 at 16:08
This question appears to be off-topic because it is about a poll on workplaces which is off topic per help center
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 11 '14 at 16:17
Hi cbinder. Welcome to The Workplace. Speculative questions aren't really what we do here; instead, we try to focus on questions that can be answered more objectively. Check out help center as well as How to Ask for further guidance. If you can edit this (or any of your other closed questions) to meet those guidelines, they'll get bumped into our reopen review queue. If you're new to our site, you might also take the tour. Hope this helps.
– jmort253♦
Aug 13 '14 at 4:05
If you want to be employeed by a third-party ( not sure what you mean by this ) then you should do it. You decide what is "ok" and "not ok" just understand any obligations that your decision creates. People are paid less for a varity of reasons all unique to the indivual getting paid less.
– Ramhound
Aug 11 '14 at 15:45
If you want to be employeed by a third-party ( not sure what you mean by this ) then you should do it. You decide what is "ok" and "not ok" just understand any obligations that your decision creates. People are paid less for a varity of reasons all unique to the indivual getting paid less.
– Ramhound
Aug 11 '14 at 15:45
It means pay will be processed by a third party .
– cbinder
Aug 11 '14 at 16:08
It means pay will be processed by a third party .
– cbinder
Aug 11 '14 at 16:08
This question appears to be off-topic because it is about a poll on workplaces which is off topic per help center
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 11 '14 at 16:17
This question appears to be off-topic because it is about a poll on workplaces which is off topic per help center
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 11 '14 at 16:17
Hi cbinder. Welcome to The Workplace. Speculative questions aren't really what we do here; instead, we try to focus on questions that can be answered more objectively. Check out help center as well as How to Ask for further guidance. If you can edit this (or any of your other closed questions) to meet those guidelines, they'll get bumped into our reopen review queue. If you're new to our site, you might also take the tour. Hope this helps.
– jmort253♦
Aug 13 '14 at 4:05
Hi cbinder. Welcome to The Workplace. Speculative questions aren't really what we do here; instead, we try to focus on questions that can be answered more objectively. Check out help center as well as How to Ask for further guidance. If you can edit this (or any of your other closed questions) to meet those guidelines, they'll get bumped into our reopen review queue. If you're new to our site, you might also take the tour. Hope this helps.
– jmort253♦
Aug 13 '14 at 4:05
suggest improvements |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
-1
down vote
accepted
Is it ok to get employed via third party when your last two
employments were on permanent company payrolls
Certainly, it's okay.
I assume here that you mean "will it look bad for future employers if I am now paid by a third party?" It's unlikely future employers will care one way or another.
Are people recruited via third party paid less?
No. People are paid what they negotiate for - without regard to who is signing the check.
answered Aug 11 '14 at 16:37
Joe Strazzere
223k106657926
suggest improvements |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
-1
down vote
accepted
Is it ok to get employed via third party when your last two
employments were on permanent company payrolls
Certainly, it's okay.
I assume here that you mean "will it look bad for future employers if I am now paid by a third party?" It's unlikely future employers will care one way or another.
Are people recruited via third party paid less?
No. People are paid what they negotiate for - without regard to who is signing the check.
answered Aug 11 '14 at 16:37
Joe Strazzere
223k106657926
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
accepted
Is it ok to get employed via third party when your last two
employments were on permanent company payrolls
Certainly, it's okay.
I assume here that you mean "will it look bad for future employers if I am now paid by a third party?" It's unlikely future employers will care one way or another.
Are people recruited via third party paid less?
No. People are paid what they negotiate for - without regard to who is signing the check.
answered Aug 11 '14 at 16:37
Joe Strazzere
223k106657926
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
accepted
up vote
-1
down vote
accepted
Is it ok to get employed via third party when your last two
employments were on permanent company payrolls
Certainly, it's okay.
I assume here that you mean "will it look bad for future employers if I am now paid by a third party?" It's unlikely future employers will care one way or another.
Are people recruited via third party paid less?
No. People are paid what they negotiate for - without regard to who is signing the check.
answered Aug 11 '14 at 16:37
Joe Strazzere
223k106657926
Is it ok to get employed via third party when your last two
employments were on permanent company payrolls
Certainly, it's okay.
I assume here that you mean "will it look bad for future employers if I am now paid by a third party?" It's unlikely future employers will care one way or another.
Are people recruited via third party paid less?
No. People are paid what they negotiate for - without regard to who is signing the check.
answered Aug 11 '14 at 16:37
Joe Strazzere
223k106657926
answered Aug 11 '14 at 16:37
Joe Strazzere
223k106657926
answered Aug 11 '14 at 16:37
Joe Strazzere
223k106657926
answered Aug 11 '14 at 16:37
Joe Strazzere
223k106657926
223k106657926
suggest improvements |Â
suggest improvements |Â
If you want to be employeed by a third-party ( not sure what you mean by this ) then you should do it. You decide what is "ok" and "not ok" just understand any obligations that your decision creates. People are paid less for a varity of reasons all unique to the indivual getting paid less.
– Ramhound
Aug 11 '14 at 15:45
It means pay will be processed by a third party .
– cbinder
Aug 11 '14 at 16:08
This question appears to be off-topic because it is about a poll on workplaces which is off topic per help center
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Aug 11 '14 at 16:17
Hi cbinder. Welcome to The Workplace. Speculative questions aren't really what we do here; instead, we try to focus on questions that can be answered more objectively. Check out help center as well as How to Ask for further guidance. If you can edit this (or any of your other closed questions) to meet those guidelines, they'll get bumped into our reopen review queue. If you're new to our site, you might also take the tour. Hope this helps.
– jmort253♦
Aug 13 '14 at 4:05