zero vector in and out of a span of vectors
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Is span of the vectors $v_1, v_2, 0$ equivalent to the span of $v_1, v_2$ ?
Im struggling to think whether this statement is true or not mainly because my train of thought is:
all vectors in a span can be multiplied by $0$ to get the zero vector, so shouldn't the zero vector be in every and any span of vectors?
linear-algebra vectors
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Is span of the vectors $v_1, v_2, 0$ equivalent to the span of $v_1, v_2$ ?
Im struggling to think whether this statement is true or not mainly because my train of thought is:
all vectors in a span can be multiplied by $0$ to get the zero vector, so shouldn't the zero vector be in every and any span of vectors?
linear-algebra vectors
Yes, the zero vector is in the span of any set of vectors. But that really has very little to do with what you're trying to prove. You need to show that $span(v_1,v_2)=span(v_1,v_2,0)$; that doesn't follow from knowing that $0$ is in both spans.
– David C. Ullrich
Aug 27 at 14:52
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Is span of the vectors $v_1, v_2, 0$ equivalent to the span of $v_1, v_2$ ?
Im struggling to think whether this statement is true or not mainly because my train of thought is:
all vectors in a span can be multiplied by $0$ to get the zero vector, so shouldn't the zero vector be in every and any span of vectors?
linear-algebra vectors
Is span of the vectors $v_1, v_2, 0$ equivalent to the span of $v_1, v_2$ ?
Im struggling to think whether this statement is true or not mainly because my train of thought is:
all vectors in a span can be multiplied by $0$ to get the zero vector, so shouldn't the zero vector be in every and any span of vectors?
linear-algebra vectors
edited Aug 27 at 6:47


LDM
730314
730314
asked Aug 27 at 6:15
lohboys
617
617
Yes, the zero vector is in the span of any set of vectors. But that really has very little to do with what you're trying to prove. You need to show that $span(v_1,v_2)=span(v_1,v_2,0)$; that doesn't follow from knowing that $0$ is in both spans.
– David C. Ullrich
Aug 27 at 14:52
add a comment |Â
Yes, the zero vector is in the span of any set of vectors. But that really has very little to do with what you're trying to prove. You need to show that $span(v_1,v_2)=span(v_1,v_2,0)$; that doesn't follow from knowing that $0$ is in both spans.
– David C. Ullrich
Aug 27 at 14:52
Yes, the zero vector is in the span of any set of vectors. But that really has very little to do with what you're trying to prove. You need to show that $span(v_1,v_2)=span(v_1,v_2,0)$; that doesn't follow from knowing that $0$ is in both spans.
– David C. Ullrich
Aug 27 at 14:52
Yes, the zero vector is in the span of any set of vectors. But that really has very little to do with what you're trying to prove. You need to show that $span(v_1,v_2)=span(v_1,v_2,0)$; that doesn't follow from knowing that $0$ is in both spans.
– David C. Ullrich
Aug 27 at 14:52
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
Yes!
Span operation is monotone!
That is if $A subset B$ then $textspan(A) subset textspan(B)$
So $textspan(v_1,v_2) subset textspan(v_1,v_2,0)$
The reverse inclusion is also true, since.....?
Remembert that $textspan(A)$ means intersection of all subspaces containing $A$ and since this intersection is again a subspace, zero is in that space . So we dont worrying about including zero in span
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
The span of $v_1,v_2,0$ is the set of all linear combinations of these three vectors, and this certainly equals the set of all linear combinations of $v_1,v_2$ which is the span of $v_1,v_2$.
Perhaps you have confused this with another matter in your question: Indeed, the zero vector is in the span of any set of vectors, because by using zero coefficients for each vector we generate the zero vector. You need to distinguish between (1) the span of a set of vectors and (2) the vectors in the set used to span.
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Yes of course by definition it easy to check that the sets $v_1, v_2, 0$ and $v_1, v_2$ span the same subspace and that the zero vector is always in the span of any non empty set of vectors.
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
@lohboys You are welcome! Bye
– gimusi
Aug 27 at 6:25
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
all vectors in a span can be multiplied by 0 to get the zero vector, so shouldn't the zero vector be in every and any span of vectors?
It's not entirely clear what your thinking is. What you might be getting at is that given any $v_1,v_2...v_n$, if $v_n+1$ is in the span of $v_1,v_2...v_n$, then the span of $v_1,v_2...v_n$ and the span of $v_1,v_2...v_n,v_n+1$ are the same. The span of a set of vectors is, by definition, closed over linear combinations; adding $v_n+1$ to your list of vectors doesn't add anything new to the span, if you can get $v_n+1$ from the other vectors.
In the example you give, the span of $v_1,v_2,0$ is defined as the set of all vectors that can be written in the form $c_1v_1+c_2v_2+c_30$, for some scalars $c_1,c_2,c_3$. But if $v=c_1v_1+c_2v_2+c_30$, then clearly $v=c_1v_1+c_2v_2$, so $v$ is in the span of $v_1,v_2$
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
Yes!
Span operation is monotone!
That is if $A subset B$ then $textspan(A) subset textspan(B)$
So $textspan(v_1,v_2) subset textspan(v_1,v_2,0)$
The reverse inclusion is also true, since.....?
Remembert that $textspan(A)$ means intersection of all subspaces containing $A$ and since this intersection is again a subspace, zero is in that space . So we dont worrying about including zero in span
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
Yes!
Span operation is monotone!
That is if $A subset B$ then $textspan(A) subset textspan(B)$
So $textspan(v_1,v_2) subset textspan(v_1,v_2,0)$
The reverse inclusion is also true, since.....?
Remembert that $textspan(A)$ means intersection of all subspaces containing $A$ and since this intersection is again a subspace, zero is in that space . So we dont worrying about including zero in span
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
Yes!
Span operation is monotone!
That is if $A subset B$ then $textspan(A) subset textspan(B)$
So $textspan(v_1,v_2) subset textspan(v_1,v_2,0)$
The reverse inclusion is also true, since.....?
Remembert that $textspan(A)$ means intersection of all subspaces containing $A$ and since this intersection is again a subspace, zero is in that space . So we dont worrying about including zero in span
Yes!
Span operation is monotone!
That is if $A subset B$ then $textspan(A) subset textspan(B)$
So $textspan(v_1,v_2) subset textspan(v_1,v_2,0)$
The reverse inclusion is also true, since.....?
Remembert that $textspan(A)$ means intersection of all subspaces containing $A$ and since this intersection is again a subspace, zero is in that space . So we dont worrying about including zero in span
answered Aug 27 at 6:21


LDM
730314
730314
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
add a comment |Â
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
The span of $v_1,v_2,0$ is the set of all linear combinations of these three vectors, and this certainly equals the set of all linear combinations of $v_1,v_2$ which is the span of $v_1,v_2$.
Perhaps you have confused this with another matter in your question: Indeed, the zero vector is in the span of any set of vectors, because by using zero coefficients for each vector we generate the zero vector. You need to distinguish between (1) the span of a set of vectors and (2) the vectors in the set used to span.
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
The span of $v_1,v_2,0$ is the set of all linear combinations of these three vectors, and this certainly equals the set of all linear combinations of $v_1,v_2$ which is the span of $v_1,v_2$.
Perhaps you have confused this with another matter in your question: Indeed, the zero vector is in the span of any set of vectors, because by using zero coefficients for each vector we generate the zero vector. You need to distinguish between (1) the span of a set of vectors and (2) the vectors in the set used to span.
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
The span of $v_1,v_2,0$ is the set of all linear combinations of these three vectors, and this certainly equals the set of all linear combinations of $v_1,v_2$ which is the span of $v_1,v_2$.
Perhaps you have confused this with another matter in your question: Indeed, the zero vector is in the span of any set of vectors, because by using zero coefficients for each vector we generate the zero vector. You need to distinguish between (1) the span of a set of vectors and (2) the vectors in the set used to span.
The span of $v_1,v_2,0$ is the set of all linear combinations of these three vectors, and this certainly equals the set of all linear combinations of $v_1,v_2$ which is the span of $v_1,v_2$.
Perhaps you have confused this with another matter in your question: Indeed, the zero vector is in the span of any set of vectors, because by using zero coefficients for each vector we generate the zero vector. You need to distinguish between (1) the span of a set of vectors and (2) the vectors in the set used to span.
edited Aug 27 at 6:42
answered Aug 27 at 6:20


Jasper Loy
2806
2806
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
add a comment |Â
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Yes of course by definition it easy to check that the sets $v_1, v_2, 0$ and $v_1, v_2$ span the same subspace and that the zero vector is always in the span of any non empty set of vectors.
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
@lohboys You are welcome! Bye
– gimusi
Aug 27 at 6:25
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Yes of course by definition it easy to check that the sets $v_1, v_2, 0$ and $v_1, v_2$ span the same subspace and that the zero vector is always in the span of any non empty set of vectors.
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
@lohboys You are welcome! Bye
– gimusi
Aug 27 at 6:25
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Yes of course by definition it easy to check that the sets $v_1, v_2, 0$ and $v_1, v_2$ span the same subspace and that the zero vector is always in the span of any non empty set of vectors.
Yes of course by definition it easy to check that the sets $v_1, v_2, 0$ and $v_1, v_2$ span the same subspace and that the zero vector is always in the span of any non empty set of vectors.
edited Aug 27 at 6:26
answered Aug 27 at 6:18
gimusi
70.7k73786
70.7k73786
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
@lohboys You are welcome! Bye
– gimusi
Aug 27 at 6:25
add a comment |Â
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
@lohboys You are welcome! Bye
– gimusi
Aug 27 at 6:25
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
thanks for the prompt reply!
– lohboys
Aug 27 at 6:24
@lohboys You are welcome! Bye
– gimusi
Aug 27 at 6:25
@lohboys You are welcome! Bye
– gimusi
Aug 27 at 6:25
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
all vectors in a span can be multiplied by 0 to get the zero vector, so shouldn't the zero vector be in every and any span of vectors?
It's not entirely clear what your thinking is. What you might be getting at is that given any $v_1,v_2...v_n$, if $v_n+1$ is in the span of $v_1,v_2...v_n$, then the span of $v_1,v_2...v_n$ and the span of $v_1,v_2...v_n,v_n+1$ are the same. The span of a set of vectors is, by definition, closed over linear combinations; adding $v_n+1$ to your list of vectors doesn't add anything new to the span, if you can get $v_n+1$ from the other vectors.
In the example you give, the span of $v_1,v_2,0$ is defined as the set of all vectors that can be written in the form $c_1v_1+c_2v_2+c_30$, for some scalars $c_1,c_2,c_3$. But if $v=c_1v_1+c_2v_2+c_30$, then clearly $v=c_1v_1+c_2v_2$, so $v$ is in the span of $v_1,v_2$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
all vectors in a span can be multiplied by 0 to get the zero vector, so shouldn't the zero vector be in every and any span of vectors?
It's not entirely clear what your thinking is. What you might be getting at is that given any $v_1,v_2...v_n$, if $v_n+1$ is in the span of $v_1,v_2...v_n$, then the span of $v_1,v_2...v_n$ and the span of $v_1,v_2...v_n,v_n+1$ are the same. The span of a set of vectors is, by definition, closed over linear combinations; adding $v_n+1$ to your list of vectors doesn't add anything new to the span, if you can get $v_n+1$ from the other vectors.
In the example you give, the span of $v_1,v_2,0$ is defined as the set of all vectors that can be written in the form $c_1v_1+c_2v_2+c_30$, for some scalars $c_1,c_2,c_3$. But if $v=c_1v_1+c_2v_2+c_30$, then clearly $v=c_1v_1+c_2v_2$, so $v$ is in the span of $v_1,v_2$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
all vectors in a span can be multiplied by 0 to get the zero vector, so shouldn't the zero vector be in every and any span of vectors?
It's not entirely clear what your thinking is. What you might be getting at is that given any $v_1,v_2...v_n$, if $v_n+1$ is in the span of $v_1,v_2...v_n$, then the span of $v_1,v_2...v_n$ and the span of $v_1,v_2...v_n,v_n+1$ are the same. The span of a set of vectors is, by definition, closed over linear combinations; adding $v_n+1$ to your list of vectors doesn't add anything new to the span, if you can get $v_n+1$ from the other vectors.
In the example you give, the span of $v_1,v_2,0$ is defined as the set of all vectors that can be written in the form $c_1v_1+c_2v_2+c_30$, for some scalars $c_1,c_2,c_3$. But if $v=c_1v_1+c_2v_2+c_30$, then clearly $v=c_1v_1+c_2v_2$, so $v$ is in the span of $v_1,v_2$
all vectors in a span can be multiplied by 0 to get the zero vector, so shouldn't the zero vector be in every and any span of vectors?
It's not entirely clear what your thinking is. What you might be getting at is that given any $v_1,v_2...v_n$, if $v_n+1$ is in the span of $v_1,v_2...v_n$, then the span of $v_1,v_2...v_n$ and the span of $v_1,v_2...v_n,v_n+1$ are the same. The span of a set of vectors is, by definition, closed over linear combinations; adding $v_n+1$ to your list of vectors doesn't add anything new to the span, if you can get $v_n+1$ from the other vectors.
In the example you give, the span of $v_1,v_2,0$ is defined as the set of all vectors that can be written in the form $c_1v_1+c_2v_2+c_30$, for some scalars $c_1,c_2,c_3$. But if $v=c_1v_1+c_2v_2+c_30$, then clearly $v=c_1v_1+c_2v_2$, so $v$ is in the span of $v_1,v_2$
answered Aug 27 at 15:16
Acccumulation
5,2742515
5,2742515
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2895885%2fzero-vector-in-and-out-of-a-span-of-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Yes, the zero vector is in the span of any set of vectors. But that really has very little to do with what you're trying to prove. You need to show that $span(v_1,v_2)=span(v_1,v_2,0)$; that doesn't follow from knowing that $0$ is in both spans.
– David C. Ullrich
Aug 27 at 14:52