Mixing
What forms are the verbs in “Omnibus rebus paratis, Caesar milites naves conscendere jussit�
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
In "Omnibus rebus paratis, Caesar milites naves conscendere jussit", what forms are the verbs "paratis" and "jussit", and why?
This sentence was taken from Gramática latina de Napoleão Mendes, from the chapter talking about the Absolute Ablative and Ablative Gerund (not sure about the names in English). Independent of the case the phrase is related to, the verbs were expected to be in participle form, which doesn't seems to be the case, seeing as the participle form ends in "-ns, -ntis."
"Paratis", as far as I know, is the 2nd person plural present for the verb paro, -are, and "jussit" is the 3rd person singular past perfect of the verb jubeo, -es, jussi, jussum, -ere.
The translation for the sentence given in the book is:
Preparadas todas as coisas, César ordenou que os soldados subissem nos navios. (Pt)
Prepared everything, Caesar ordered the soldiers to board the ship. (Partially Google translated)
verbs gerundium ablativus-absolutus
edited Aug 30 at 8:16
jwodder
28629
asked Aug 29 at 19:48
ryuichi
604
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
In "Omnibus rebus paratis, Caesar milites naves conscendere jussit", what forms are the verbs "paratis" and "jussit", and why?
This sentence was taken from Gramática latina de Napoleão Mendes, from the chapter talking about the Absolute Ablative and Ablative Gerund (not sure about the names in English). Independent of the case the phrase is related to, the verbs were expected to be in participle form, which doesn't seems to be the case, seeing as the participle form ends in "-ns, -ntis."
"Paratis", as far as I know, is the 2nd person plural present for the verb paro, -are, and "jussit" is the 3rd person singular past perfect of the verb jubeo, -es, jussi, jussum, -ere.
The translation for the sentence given in the book is:
Preparadas todas as coisas, César ordenou que os soldados subissem nos navios. (Pt)
Prepared everything, Caesar ordered the soldiers to board the ship. (Partially Google translated)
verbs gerundium ablativus-absolutus
edited Aug 30 at 8:16
jwodder
28629
asked Aug 29 at 19:48
ryuichi
604
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
In "Omnibus rebus paratis, Caesar milites naves conscendere jussit", what forms are the verbs "paratis" and "jussit", and why?
This sentence was taken from Gramática latina de Napoleão Mendes, from the chapter talking about the Absolute Ablative and Ablative Gerund (not sure about the names in English). Independent of the case the phrase is related to, the verbs were expected to be in participle form, which doesn't seems to be the case, seeing as the participle form ends in "-ns, -ntis."
"Paratis", as far as I know, is the 2nd person plural present for the verb paro, -are, and "jussit" is the 3rd person singular past perfect of the verb jubeo, -es, jussi, jussum, -ere.
The translation for the sentence given in the book is:
Preparadas todas as coisas, César ordenou que os soldados subissem nos navios. (Pt)
Prepared everything, Caesar ordered the soldiers to board the ship. (Partially Google translated)
verbs gerundium ablativus-absolutus
edited Aug 30 at 8:16
jwodder
28629
asked Aug 29 at 19:48
ryuichi
604
In "Omnibus rebus paratis, Caesar milites naves conscendere jussit", what forms are the verbs "paratis" and "jussit", and why?
This sentence was taken from Gramática latina de Napoleão Mendes, from the chapter talking about the Absolute Ablative and Ablative Gerund (not sure about the names in English). Independent of the case the phrase is related to, the verbs were expected to be in participle form, which doesn't seems to be the case, seeing as the participle form ends in "-ns, -ntis."
"Paratis", as far as I know, is the 2nd person plural present for the verb paro, -are, and "jussit" is the 3rd person singular past perfect of the verb jubeo, -es, jussi, jussum, -ere.
The translation for the sentence given in the book is:
Preparadas todas as coisas, César ordenou que os soldados subissem nos navios. (Pt)
Prepared everything, Caesar ordered the soldiers to board the ship. (Partially Google translated)
verbs gerundium ablativus-absolutus
edited Aug 30 at 8:16
jwodder
28629
asked Aug 29 at 19:48
ryuichi
604
edited Aug 30 at 8:16
jwodder
28629
edited Aug 30 at 8:16
jwodder
28629
edited Aug 30 at 8:16
jwodder
28629
28629
asked Aug 29 at 19:48
ryuichi
604
asked Aug 29 at 19:48
ryuichi
604
asked Aug 29 at 19:48
ryuichi
604
604
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
You were spot on with your parsing of iussit; it is, in fact, the third person singular perfect active indicative of iubeÃ…Â, iubēre, iussÄ«, iussum.
With regards to parÄÂtÄ«s (the macrons should give a bit of a spoiler regarding what it is), you were not quite there. It is the perfect passive participle of parÃ…Â, parÄÂre, parÄÂvÄ«, parÄÂtum, and is being used in an ablative absolute expression.
The whole phrase should be translated as such:
Omnibus rēbus parÄÂtÄ«s, Caesar mÄ«litēs navēs cÃ…Ânscendere iussit.
With all things (having been) prepared, Caesar ordered the soldiers to board the ships.
As a bit of a side note, Caesar's commentaries (to the best of my knowledge) are almost exclusively written in the third person; unless something or someone is being quoted, potentially ambiguous forms that look like personal conjugations (1st, 2nd person), like paratis (without the macrons, of course), can usually be assumed to not be personal conjugations.
answered Aug 29 at 20:36
Ethan Bierlein
897117
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
You were spot on with your parsing of iussit; it is, in fact, the third person singular perfect active indicative of iubeÃ…Â, iubēre, iussÄ«, iussum.
With regards to parÄÂtÄ«s (the macrons should give a bit of a spoiler regarding what it is), you were not quite there. It is the perfect passive participle of parÃ…Â, parÄÂre, parÄÂvÄ«, parÄÂtum, and is being used in an ablative absolute expression.
The whole phrase should be translated as such:
Omnibus rēbus parÄÂtÄ«s, Caesar mÄ«litēs navēs cÃ…Ânscendere iussit.
With all things (having been) prepared, Caesar ordered the soldiers to board the ships.
As a bit of a side note, Caesar's commentaries (to the best of my knowledge) are almost exclusively written in the third person; unless something or someone is being quoted, potentially ambiguous forms that look like personal conjugations (1st, 2nd person), like paratis (without the macrons, of course), can usually be assumed to not be personal conjugations.
answered Aug 29 at 20:36
Ethan Bierlein
897117
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
You were spot on with your parsing of iussit; it is, in fact, the third person singular perfect active indicative of iubeÃ…Â, iubēre, iussÄ«, iussum.
With regards to parÄÂtÄ«s (the macrons should give a bit of a spoiler regarding what it is), you were not quite there. It is the perfect passive participle of parÃ…Â, parÄÂre, parÄÂvÄ«, parÄÂtum, and is being used in an ablative absolute expression.
The whole phrase should be translated as such:
Omnibus rēbus parÄÂtÄ«s, Caesar mÄ«litēs navēs cÃ…Ânscendere iussit.
With all things (having been) prepared, Caesar ordered the soldiers to board the ships.
As a bit of a side note, Caesar's commentaries (to the best of my knowledge) are almost exclusively written in the third person; unless something or someone is being quoted, potentially ambiguous forms that look like personal conjugations (1st, 2nd person), like paratis (without the macrons, of course), can usually be assumed to not be personal conjugations.
answered Aug 29 at 20:36
Ethan Bierlein
897117
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
You were spot on with your parsing of iussit; it is, in fact, the third person singular perfect active indicative of iubeÃ…Â, iubēre, iussÄ«, iussum.
With regards to parÄÂtÄ«s (the macrons should give a bit of a spoiler regarding what it is), you were not quite there. It is the perfect passive participle of parÃ…Â, parÄÂre, parÄÂvÄ«, parÄÂtum, and is being used in an ablative absolute expression.
The whole phrase should be translated as such:
Omnibus rēbus parÄÂtÄ«s, Caesar mÄ«litēs navēs cÃ…Ânscendere iussit.
With all things (having been) prepared, Caesar ordered the soldiers to board the ships.
As a bit of a side note, Caesar's commentaries (to the best of my knowledge) are almost exclusively written in the third person; unless something or someone is being quoted, potentially ambiguous forms that look like personal conjugations (1st, 2nd person), like paratis (without the macrons, of course), can usually be assumed to not be personal conjugations.
answered Aug 29 at 20:36
Ethan Bierlein
897117
You were spot on with your parsing of iussit; it is, in fact, the third person singular perfect active indicative of iubeÃ…Â, iubēre, iussÄ«, iussum.
With regards to parÄÂtÄ«s (the macrons should give a bit of a spoiler regarding what it is), you were not quite there. It is the perfect passive participle of parÃ…Â, parÄÂre, parÄÂvÄ«, parÄÂtum, and is being used in an ablative absolute expression.
The whole phrase should be translated as such:
Omnibus rēbus parÄÂtÄ«s, Caesar mÄ«litēs navēs cÃ…Ânscendere iussit.
With all things (having been) prepared, Caesar ordered the soldiers to board the ships.
As a bit of a side note, Caesar's commentaries (to the best of my knowledge) are almost exclusively written in the third person; unless something or someone is being quoted, potentially ambiguous forms that look like personal conjugations (1st, 2nd person), like paratis (without the macrons, of course), can usually be assumed to not be personal conjugations.
answered Aug 29 at 20:36
Ethan Bierlein
897117
edited Aug 30 at 3:15
answered Aug 29 at 20:36
Ethan Bierlein
897117
answered Aug 29 at 20:36
Ethan Bierlein
897117
answered Aug 29 at 20:36
Ethan Bierlein
897117
897117
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f7107%2fwhat-forms-are-the-verbs-in-omnibus-rebus-paratis-caesar-milites-naves-conscen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password