I need to modify a script but it's full of gibberish

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
6
down vote

favorite












I need to modify a script which is part of a programme I downloaded. However, when I try to view the script with vim, it is full of symbols, numbers and letters placed randomly. Is there anything I can do to read this script? This is part of the script:



ELF > @ @ J @ 8 @ @ @ @ @ @ À À @ @ @ @ TB TB XB XBa XBa ˜† €B €Ba €Ba à à @ @ Påtd „( „(A „(A ´ ´ Qåtd /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 GNU % 8 ) # 7 $ . ' " , 1 * 6 5 3 / 2 % - 0 

! ( + 4 & ± A ! ® * 9 × ñ « P z â ó ³ í
a ¥
3 ¢ Æ ? s Š X ð é ö # N t 9 Ü M ) Š £ z [ - : S B Ô 3 e Ô P t : € ‘ È ò – É ² ï Û h : û ¦ A ÀFa ) E [ ­ † Á H â d & ÈFa ä û Ð þ ‹ – libgfortran.so.3 _gfortran_st_write_done __gmon_start__ _Jv_RegisterClasses _gfortran_transfer_integer _gfortran_st_read _gfortran_st_inquire _gfortran_set_args _gfortran_iargc _gfortran_st_rewind _ITM_deregisterTMCloneTable _gfortran_pow_i4_i4 _ITM_registerTMCloneTable _gfortran_st_write _gfortran_st_read_done _gfortran_transfer_integer_write _gfortran_compare_string _gfortran_set_options _gfortran_st_close _gfortran_getarg_i4 _gfortran_transfer_character_write _gfortran_transfer_real_write _gfortran_transfer_logical_write _gfortran_stop_string _gfortran_transfer_real _gfortran_st_open _gfortran_transfer_character libm.so.6 truncf cosf sinf sqrtf powf log10f libgcc_s.so.1 __powisf2 libquadmath.so.0 libc.so.6 fflush exit sprintf _IO_putc fopen strncmp strncpy signal getpid calloc strlen memset stdout fputs memcpy fclose stderr fprintf memmove _IO_getc __libc_start_main free /cm/shared/apps/mpich2/3.2/gcc/lib:/cm/shared/apps/fftw/gcc/64/3.3.4/lib/ GLIBC_2.2.5 GCC_4.0.0 GFORTRAN_1.0 GFORTRAN_1.4 p ui  `Z' Î Æ ui  €eù Ø „eù å `Da ÀFa . ÈFa 4 €Da ˆDa Da ˜Da  Da ¨Da °Da ¸Da
ÀDa ÈDa ÐDa
ØDa àDa èDa ðDa øDa Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea (Ea 0Ea 8Ea @Ea HEa PEa XEa `Ea ! hEa " pEa # xEa $ €Ea % ˆEa & Ea ' ˜Ea (  Ea ) ¨Ea * °Ea + ¸Ea , ÀEa - ÈEa / ÐEa 0 ØEa 1 àEa 2 èEa 3 ðEa 5 øEa 6 Fa 7 Hƒìè[ èZ èõ HƒÄÃÿ5z1! ÿ%|1! @ ÿ%z1! h éàÿÿÿÿ%r1! h éÐÿÿÿÿ%j1! h éÀÿÿÿÿ%b1! h é°ÿÿÿÿ%Z1! h é ÿÿÿÿ%R1! h éÿÿÿÿ%J1! h é€ÿÿÿÿ%B1! h épÿÿÿÿ%:1! h é`ÿÿÿÿ%21! h éPÿÿÿÿ%*1! h
é@ÿÿÿÿ%"1! h é0ÿÿÿÿ%1! h é ÿÿÿÿ%1! h
éÿÿÿÿ%
1! h é ÿÿÿÿ%1! h éðþÿÿÿ%ú0! h éàþÿÿÿ%ò0! h éÐþÿÿÿ%ê0! h éÀþÿÿÿ%â0! h é°þÿÿÿ%Ú0! h é þÿÿÿ%Ò0! h éþÿÿÿ%Ê0! h é€þÿÿÿ%Â0! h épþÿÿÿ%º0! h é`þÿÿÿ%²0! h éPþÿÿÿ%ª0! h é@þÿÿÿ%¢0! h é0þÿÿÿ%š0! h é þÿÿÿ%’0! h éþÿÿÿ%Š0! h é þÿÿÿ%‚0! h éðýÿÿÿ%z0! h éàýÿÿÿ%r0! h! éÐýÿÿÿ%j0! h" éÀýÿÿÿ%b0! h# é°ýÿÿÿ%Z0! h$ é ýÿÿÿ%R0! h% éýÿÿÿ%J0! h& é€ýÿÿÿ%B0! h' épýÿÿÿ%:0! h( é`ýÿÿÿ%20! h) éPýÿÿÿ%*0! h* é@ýÿÿÿ%"0! h+ é0ýÿÿÿ%0! h, é ýÿÿÿ%0! h- éýÿÿÿ%
0! h. é ýÿÿÿ%0! h/ éðüÿÿÿ%ú/! h0 éàüÿÿ1íI‰Ñ^H‰âHƒäðPTIÇÀ@A HÇÁPA HÇÇA°@ èWýÿÿôHƒìH‹.! H…ÀtÿÐHƒÄø¿Fa UH-¸Fa HƒøH‰åw]ø H…Àtô]¿¸Fa ÿà€ ¸¸Fa UH-¸Fa HÁøH‰åH‰ÂHÁê?HÐHÑøu]ú H…Òtô]H‰Æ¿¸Fa ÿ†€=ù/! u_UH‰åS»pBa HëhBa HƒìH‹ã/! HÁûHƒëH9Øs$fD HƒÀH‰Å/! ÿÅhBa H‹·/! H9Ørâè5ÿÿÿÆž/! HƒÄÀ Hƒ=0+! t¸ H…ÀtU¿xBa H‰åÿÐ]é+ÿÿÿ é#ÿÿÿUH‰åH‰}è‰uä‹MäHcÉH‰Èº ‹Eä‰EøÇEô ‹Eø‰Eüƒ}ü ~.‹Eü‰EôH‹Uè‹EüƒèH˜¶< uƒ}ü”À¶Àƒmü…ÀuëÒ‹Eô]ÃUH‰åHƒì`H‰}ØH‰uÐH‰UÈH‰MÀL‰E¸D‰M´‹E´H˜I‰ÂA» ‹U´H‹EȉÖH‰Çè ‰EøH‹EØ‹ ‰EôH‹EØó‹Eøó*ÀH‹EÀóóYÂóXÁóEðH‹EÐóH‹EÀóóà óYÂóÈ(ÁóEìH‹EÐóH‹EÀó óXÁóEè¿@A ¸ èTš HMèHUðHuìHEôHÇD$DA HÇ$DA A¹@A A¸@A H‰Ç¸ èZ³ H‹E¸H‰Ç¸ è š ‹Eø…À~4‹T ‰EüLMøLEüH‹MÈH‹UÀH‹uÐH‹EØ‹}´‰<$H‰Ç¸ èV« ÉÃUH‰åH‰}è‰uä‹MäHcÉH‰Èº ‹Eä‰Eø‹Eø‰Eüƒ}ü ~3‹Eü‰EôH‹Uè‹EüƒèH˜¶< t‹Eôëƒ}ü”À¶Àƒmü…ÀuëÍ‹Eô]ÃUH‰åHƒìpH‰}ÈH‰uÀH‰U¸H‰M°L‰E¨L‰M H‹E@Ç H‹E ‹ ‰EàH‹E(‹ ‰EØH‹E0‹ ‰EÜH‹E8‹ ‰EÔL‹MÀL‹E¸H‹MÈH‹U°HuØHEàH}èH‰<$H‰Çèy L‹MÀL‹E¸H‹MÈH‹U°HuÔHEÜH}äH‰<$H‰ÇèQ óEàóMÜ.Áz.Át%óEÔóMØóÁóMÜóUàóÊó^ÁóEøóEØóMÔ.Áz.Át%óEÜóMàóÁóMÔóUØóÊó^ÁóEô‹Eè…Àu‹Eä…À„œ ‹Eè™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu‹Eä™ÁêЃà)Ѓø„° ‹Eè‰ÂÁêÐÑø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu‹Eä‰ÂÁêÐÑø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøtx‹EèP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu‹EäP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøt<‹EèP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu#‹EäP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøuéì ‹Uè‹Eä9ÂuéÝ ‹Eè…Àu‹Eä‰Eüë‹Eè‰Eü‹Eü™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu-H‹EÈó óMàóÁóYEøóMØóXÁóEìH‹EÈ‹ ‰Eð‹Eü‰ÂÁêÐÑø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu-H‹EÀó óMàóÁóYEøóMØóXÁóEìH‹EÀ‹ ‰Eð‹EüP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu-H‹E°ó óMØóÁóYEôóMàóXÁóEðH‹E°‹ ‰Eì‹EüP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu-H‹E¸ó óMØóÁóYEôóMàóXÁóEðH‹E¸‹ ‰Eì‹Eè9Eüu9‹Eð‰Eà‹Eì‰EØL‹MÀL‹E¸H‹MÈH‹U°HuØHEàH}èH‰<$H‰Çèo é‹ýÿÿ‹Eð‰EÜ‹Eì‰EÔL‹MÀL‹E¸H‹MÈH‹U°HuÔHEÜH}äH‰<$H‰Çè6 éRýÿÿ‹EàH‹U¨‰‹EÜH‹U‰‹EØH‹U ‰‹EÔH‹U‰H‹E@Ç ÉÃUH‰åH‰}øH‰uðH‰UèH‰MàL‰EØL‰MÐH‹EÇ H‹EøóH‹Eàó .ÁvH‹EÇ ëH‹Eøó H‹EÐó.Áv
H‹EÇ H‹EðóH‹EØó .ÁvH‹E‹ PH‹E‰ë&H‹Eðó H‹Eèó.ÁwëH‹E‹ PH‹E‰]ÃUH‰åAUATSHìˆ H‰½øþÿÿH‰µðþÿÿH‰•èþÿÿH‰àþÿÿL‰…ØþÿÿL‰Ðþÿÿ‹EpH˜I‰ÄA½ ‹ExH˜I‰ÂA» H‹E






share|improve this question


















  • 21




    welcome to U&L, this is not a script but a binary (as seen by ELF string). to modify it, you need to edit sources, and recompile it.
    – Archemar
    Sep 1 at 9:28






  • 4




    fortran, looks like.
    – mikeserv
    Sep 1 at 9:48






  • 2




    @mikeserv How can you tell?
    – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
    Sep 1 at 12:59






  • 7




    @ThorbjørnRavnAndersen If you scroll to the right there’s some strings like libgfortran.so.3 and _gfortran_transfer_integer.
    – NobodyNada
    Sep 1 at 14:26






  • 12




    I'm curious, why did you think this was a script?
    – pipe
    Sep 1 at 21:50














up vote
6
down vote

favorite












I need to modify a script which is part of a programme I downloaded. However, when I try to view the script with vim, it is full of symbols, numbers and letters placed randomly. Is there anything I can do to read this script? This is part of the script:



ELF > @ @ J @ 8 @ @ @ @ @ @ À À @ @ @ @ TB TB XB XBa XBa ˜† €B €Ba €Ba à à @ @ Påtd „( „(A „(A ´ ´ Qåtd /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 GNU % 8 ) # 7 $ . ' " , 1 * 6 5 3 / 2 % - 0 

! ( + 4 & ± A ! ® * 9 × ñ « P z â ó ³ í
a ¥
3 ¢ Æ ? s Š X ð é ö # N t 9 Ü M ) Š £ z [ - : S B Ô 3 e Ô P t : € ‘ È ò – É ² ï Û h : û ¦ A ÀFa ) E [ ­ † Á H â d & ÈFa ä û Ð þ ‹ – libgfortran.so.3 _gfortran_st_write_done __gmon_start__ _Jv_RegisterClasses _gfortran_transfer_integer _gfortran_st_read _gfortran_st_inquire _gfortran_set_args _gfortran_iargc _gfortran_st_rewind _ITM_deregisterTMCloneTable _gfortran_pow_i4_i4 _ITM_registerTMCloneTable _gfortran_st_write _gfortran_st_read_done _gfortran_transfer_integer_write _gfortran_compare_string _gfortran_set_options _gfortran_st_close _gfortran_getarg_i4 _gfortran_transfer_character_write _gfortran_transfer_real_write _gfortran_transfer_logical_write _gfortran_stop_string _gfortran_transfer_real _gfortran_st_open _gfortran_transfer_character libm.so.6 truncf cosf sinf sqrtf powf log10f libgcc_s.so.1 __powisf2 libquadmath.so.0 libc.so.6 fflush exit sprintf _IO_putc fopen strncmp strncpy signal getpid calloc strlen memset stdout fputs memcpy fclose stderr fprintf memmove _IO_getc __libc_start_main free /cm/shared/apps/mpich2/3.2/gcc/lib:/cm/shared/apps/fftw/gcc/64/3.3.4/lib/ GLIBC_2.2.5 GCC_4.0.0 GFORTRAN_1.0 GFORTRAN_1.4 p ui  `Z' Î Æ ui  €eù Ø „eù å `Da ÀFa . ÈFa 4 €Da ˆDa Da ˜Da  Da ¨Da °Da ¸Da
ÀDa ÈDa ÐDa
ØDa àDa èDa ðDa øDa Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea (Ea 0Ea 8Ea @Ea HEa PEa XEa `Ea ! hEa " pEa # xEa $ €Ea % ˆEa & Ea ' ˜Ea (  Ea ) ¨Ea * °Ea + ¸Ea , ÀEa - ÈEa / ÐEa 0 ØEa 1 àEa 2 èEa 3 ðEa 5 øEa 6 Fa 7 Hƒìè[ èZ èõ HƒÄÃÿ5z1! ÿ%|1! @ ÿ%z1! h éàÿÿÿÿ%r1! h éÐÿÿÿÿ%j1! h éÀÿÿÿÿ%b1! h é°ÿÿÿÿ%Z1! h é ÿÿÿÿ%R1! h éÿÿÿÿ%J1! h é€ÿÿÿÿ%B1! h épÿÿÿÿ%:1! h é`ÿÿÿÿ%21! h éPÿÿÿÿ%*1! h
é@ÿÿÿÿ%"1! h é0ÿÿÿÿ%1! h é ÿÿÿÿ%1! h
éÿÿÿÿ%
1! h é ÿÿÿÿ%1! h éðþÿÿÿ%ú0! h éàþÿÿÿ%ò0! h éÐþÿÿÿ%ê0! h éÀþÿÿÿ%â0! h é°þÿÿÿ%Ú0! h é þÿÿÿ%Ò0! h éþÿÿÿ%Ê0! h é€þÿÿÿ%Â0! h épþÿÿÿ%º0! h é`þÿÿÿ%²0! h éPþÿÿÿ%ª0! h é@þÿÿÿ%¢0! h é0þÿÿÿ%š0! h é þÿÿÿ%’0! h éþÿÿÿ%Š0! h é þÿÿÿ%‚0! h éðýÿÿÿ%z0! h éàýÿÿÿ%r0! h! éÐýÿÿÿ%j0! h" éÀýÿÿÿ%b0! h# é°ýÿÿÿ%Z0! h$ é ýÿÿÿ%R0! h% éýÿÿÿ%J0! h& é€ýÿÿÿ%B0! h' épýÿÿÿ%:0! h( é`ýÿÿÿ%20! h) éPýÿÿÿ%*0! h* é@ýÿÿÿ%"0! h+ é0ýÿÿÿ%0! h, é ýÿÿÿ%0! h- éýÿÿÿ%
0! h. é ýÿÿÿ%0! h/ éðüÿÿÿ%ú/! h0 éàüÿÿ1íI‰Ñ^H‰âHƒäðPTIÇÀ@A HÇÁPA HÇÇA°@ èWýÿÿôHƒìH‹.! H…ÀtÿÐHƒÄø¿Fa UH-¸Fa HƒøH‰åw]ø H…Àtô]¿¸Fa ÿà€ ¸¸Fa UH-¸Fa HÁøH‰åH‰ÂHÁê?HÐHÑøu]ú H…Òtô]H‰Æ¿¸Fa ÿ†€=ù/! u_UH‰åS»pBa HëhBa HƒìH‹ã/! HÁûHƒëH9Øs$fD HƒÀH‰Å/! ÿÅhBa H‹·/! H9Ørâè5ÿÿÿÆž/! HƒÄÀ Hƒ=0+! t¸ H…ÀtU¿xBa H‰åÿÐ]é+ÿÿÿ é#ÿÿÿUH‰åH‰}è‰uä‹MäHcÉH‰Èº ‹Eä‰EøÇEô ‹Eø‰Eüƒ}ü ~.‹Eü‰EôH‹Uè‹EüƒèH˜¶< uƒ}ü”À¶Àƒmü…ÀuëÒ‹Eô]ÃUH‰åHƒì`H‰}ØH‰uÐH‰UÈH‰MÀL‰E¸D‰M´‹E´H˜I‰ÂA» ‹U´H‹EȉÖH‰Çè ‰EøH‹EØ‹ ‰EôH‹EØó‹Eøó*ÀH‹EÀóóYÂóXÁóEðH‹EÐóH‹EÀóóà óYÂóÈ(ÁóEìH‹EÐóH‹EÀó óXÁóEè¿@A ¸ èTš HMèHUðHuìHEôHÇD$DA HÇ$DA A¹@A A¸@A H‰Ç¸ èZ³ H‹E¸H‰Ç¸ è š ‹Eø…À~4‹T ‰EüLMøLEüH‹MÈH‹UÀH‹uÐH‹EØ‹}´‰<$H‰Ç¸ èV« ÉÃUH‰åH‰}è‰uä‹MäHcÉH‰Èº ‹Eä‰Eø‹Eø‰Eüƒ}ü ~3‹Eü‰EôH‹Uè‹EüƒèH˜¶< t‹Eôëƒ}ü”À¶Àƒmü…ÀuëÍ‹Eô]ÃUH‰åHƒìpH‰}ÈH‰uÀH‰U¸H‰M°L‰E¨L‰M H‹E@Ç H‹E ‹ ‰EàH‹E(‹ ‰EØH‹E0‹ ‰EÜH‹E8‹ ‰EÔL‹MÀL‹E¸H‹MÈH‹U°HuØHEàH}èH‰<$H‰Çèy L‹MÀL‹E¸H‹MÈH‹U°HuÔHEÜH}äH‰<$H‰ÇèQ óEàóMÜ.Áz.Át%óEÔóMØóÁóMÜóUàóÊó^ÁóEøóEØóMÔ.Áz.Át%óEÜóMàóÁóMÔóUØóÊó^ÁóEô‹Eè…Àu‹Eä…À„œ ‹Eè™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu‹Eä™ÁêЃà)Ѓø„° ‹Eè‰ÂÁêÐÑø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu‹Eä‰ÂÁêÐÑø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøtx‹EèP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu‹EäP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøt<‹EèP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu#‹EäP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøuéì ‹Uè‹Eä9ÂuéÝ ‹Eè…Àu‹Eä‰Eüë‹Eè‰Eü‹Eü™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu-H‹EÈó óMàóÁóYEøóMØóXÁóEìH‹EÈ‹ ‰Eð‹Eü‰ÂÁêÐÑø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu-H‹EÀó óMàóÁóYEøóMØóXÁóEìH‹EÀ‹ ‰Eð‹EüP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu-H‹E°ó óMØóÁóYEôóMàóXÁóEðH‹E°‹ ‰Eì‹EüP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu-H‹E¸ó óMØóÁóYEôóMàóXÁóEðH‹E¸‹ ‰Eì‹Eè9Eüu9‹Eð‰Eà‹Eì‰EØL‹MÀL‹E¸H‹MÈH‹U°HuØHEàH}èH‰<$H‰Çèo é‹ýÿÿ‹Eð‰EÜ‹Eì‰EÔL‹MÀL‹E¸H‹MÈH‹U°HuÔHEÜH}äH‰<$H‰Çè6 éRýÿÿ‹EàH‹U¨‰‹EÜH‹U‰‹EØH‹U ‰‹EÔH‹U‰H‹E@Ç ÉÃUH‰åH‰}øH‰uðH‰UèH‰MàL‰EØL‰MÐH‹EÇ H‹EøóH‹Eàó .ÁvH‹EÇ ëH‹Eøó H‹EÐó.Áv
H‹EÇ H‹EðóH‹EØó .ÁvH‹E‹ PH‹E‰ë&H‹Eðó H‹Eèó.ÁwëH‹E‹ PH‹E‰]ÃUH‰åAUATSHìˆ H‰½øþÿÿH‰µðþÿÿH‰•èþÿÿH‰àþÿÿL‰…ØþÿÿL‰Ðþÿÿ‹EpH˜I‰ÄA½ ‹ExH˜I‰ÂA» H‹E






share|improve this question


















  • 21




    welcome to U&L, this is not a script but a binary (as seen by ELF string). to modify it, you need to edit sources, and recompile it.
    – Archemar
    Sep 1 at 9:28






  • 4




    fortran, looks like.
    – mikeserv
    Sep 1 at 9:48






  • 2




    @mikeserv How can you tell?
    – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
    Sep 1 at 12:59






  • 7




    @ThorbjørnRavnAndersen If you scroll to the right there’s some strings like libgfortran.so.3 and _gfortran_transfer_integer.
    – NobodyNada
    Sep 1 at 14:26






  • 12




    I'm curious, why did you think this was a script?
    – pipe
    Sep 1 at 21:50












up vote
6
down vote

favorite









up vote
6
down vote

favorite











I need to modify a script which is part of a programme I downloaded. However, when I try to view the script with vim, it is full of symbols, numbers and letters placed randomly. Is there anything I can do to read this script? This is part of the script:



ELF > @ @ J @ 8 @ @ @ @ @ @ À À @ @ @ @ TB TB XB XBa XBa ˜† €B €Ba €Ba à à @ @ Påtd „( „(A „(A ´ ´ Qåtd /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 GNU % 8 ) # 7 $ . ' " , 1 * 6 5 3 / 2 % - 0 

! ( + 4 & ± A ! ® * 9 × ñ « P z â ó ³ í
a ¥
3 ¢ Æ ? s Š X ð é ö # N t 9 Ü M ) Š £ z [ - : S B Ô 3 e Ô P t : € ‘ È ò – É ² ï Û h : û ¦ A ÀFa ) E [ ­ † Á H â d & ÈFa ä û Ð þ ‹ – libgfortran.so.3 _gfortran_st_write_done __gmon_start__ _Jv_RegisterClasses _gfortran_transfer_integer _gfortran_st_read _gfortran_st_inquire _gfortran_set_args _gfortran_iargc _gfortran_st_rewind _ITM_deregisterTMCloneTable _gfortran_pow_i4_i4 _ITM_registerTMCloneTable _gfortran_st_write _gfortran_st_read_done _gfortran_transfer_integer_write _gfortran_compare_string _gfortran_set_options _gfortran_st_close _gfortran_getarg_i4 _gfortran_transfer_character_write _gfortran_transfer_real_write _gfortran_transfer_logical_write _gfortran_stop_string _gfortran_transfer_real _gfortran_st_open _gfortran_transfer_character libm.so.6 truncf cosf sinf sqrtf powf log10f libgcc_s.so.1 __powisf2 libquadmath.so.0 libc.so.6 fflush exit sprintf _IO_putc fopen strncmp strncpy signal getpid calloc strlen memset stdout fputs memcpy fclose stderr fprintf memmove _IO_getc __libc_start_main free /cm/shared/apps/mpich2/3.2/gcc/lib:/cm/shared/apps/fftw/gcc/64/3.3.4/lib/ GLIBC_2.2.5 GCC_4.0.0 GFORTRAN_1.0 GFORTRAN_1.4 p ui  `Z' Î Æ ui  €eù Ø „eù å `Da ÀFa . ÈFa 4 €Da ˆDa Da ˜Da  Da ¨Da °Da ¸Da
ÀDa ÈDa ÐDa
ØDa àDa èDa ðDa øDa Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea (Ea 0Ea 8Ea @Ea HEa PEa XEa `Ea ! hEa " pEa # xEa $ €Ea % ˆEa & Ea ' ˜Ea (  Ea ) ¨Ea * °Ea + ¸Ea , ÀEa - ÈEa / ÐEa 0 ØEa 1 àEa 2 èEa 3 ðEa 5 øEa 6 Fa 7 Hƒìè[ èZ èõ HƒÄÃÿ5z1! ÿ%|1! @ ÿ%z1! h éàÿÿÿÿ%r1! h éÐÿÿÿÿ%j1! h éÀÿÿÿÿ%b1! h é°ÿÿÿÿ%Z1! h é ÿÿÿÿ%R1! h éÿÿÿÿ%J1! h é€ÿÿÿÿ%B1! h épÿÿÿÿ%:1! h é`ÿÿÿÿ%21! h éPÿÿÿÿ%*1! h
é@ÿÿÿÿ%"1! h é0ÿÿÿÿ%1! h é ÿÿÿÿ%1! h
éÿÿÿÿ%
1! h é ÿÿÿÿ%1! h éðþÿÿÿ%ú0! h éàþÿÿÿ%ò0! h éÐþÿÿÿ%ê0! h éÀþÿÿÿ%â0! h é°þÿÿÿ%Ú0! h é þÿÿÿ%Ò0! h éþÿÿÿ%Ê0! h é€þÿÿÿ%Â0! h épþÿÿÿ%º0! h é`þÿÿÿ%²0! h éPþÿÿÿ%ª0! h é@þÿÿÿ%¢0! h é0þÿÿÿ%š0! h é þÿÿÿ%’0! h éþÿÿÿ%Š0! h é þÿÿÿ%‚0! h éðýÿÿÿ%z0! h éàýÿÿÿ%r0! h! éÐýÿÿÿ%j0! h" éÀýÿÿÿ%b0! h# é°ýÿÿÿ%Z0! h$ é ýÿÿÿ%R0! h% éýÿÿÿ%J0! h& é€ýÿÿÿ%B0! h' épýÿÿÿ%:0! h( é`ýÿÿÿ%20! h) éPýÿÿÿ%*0! h* é@ýÿÿÿ%"0! h+ é0ýÿÿÿ%0! h, é ýÿÿÿ%0! h- éýÿÿÿ%
0! h. é ýÿÿÿ%0! h/ éðüÿÿÿ%ú/! h0 éàüÿÿ1íI‰Ñ^H‰âHƒäðPTIÇÀ@A HÇÁPA HÇÇA°@ èWýÿÿôHƒìH‹.! H…ÀtÿÐHƒÄø¿Fa UH-¸Fa HƒøH‰åw]ø H…Àtô]¿¸Fa ÿà€ ¸¸Fa UH-¸Fa HÁøH‰åH‰ÂHÁê?HÐHÑøu]ú H…Òtô]H‰Æ¿¸Fa ÿ†€=ù/! u_UH‰åS»pBa HëhBa HƒìH‹ã/! HÁûHƒëH9Øs$fD HƒÀH‰Å/! ÿÅhBa H‹·/! H9Ørâè5ÿÿÿÆž/! HƒÄÀ Hƒ=0+! t¸ H…ÀtU¿xBa H‰åÿÐ]é+ÿÿÿ é#ÿÿÿUH‰åH‰}è‰uä‹MäHcÉH‰Èº ‹Eä‰EøÇEô ‹Eø‰Eüƒ}ü ~.‹Eü‰EôH‹Uè‹EüƒèH˜¶< uƒ}ü”À¶Àƒmü…ÀuëÒ‹Eô]ÃUH‰åHƒì`H‰}ØH‰uÐH‰UÈH‰MÀL‰E¸D‰M´‹E´H˜I‰ÂA» ‹U´H‹EȉÖH‰Çè ‰EøH‹EØ‹ ‰EôH‹EØó‹Eøó*ÀH‹EÀóóYÂóXÁóEðH‹EÐóH‹EÀóóà óYÂóÈ(ÁóEìH‹EÐóH‹EÀó óXÁóEè¿@A ¸ èTš HMèHUðHuìHEôHÇD$DA HÇ$DA A¹@A A¸@A H‰Ç¸ èZ³ H‹E¸H‰Ç¸ è š ‹Eø…À~4‹T ‰EüLMøLEüH‹MÈH‹UÀH‹uÐH‹EØ‹}´‰<$H‰Ç¸ èV« ÉÃUH‰åH‰}è‰uä‹MäHcÉH‰Èº ‹Eä‰Eø‹Eø‰Eüƒ}ü ~3‹Eü‰EôH‹Uè‹EüƒèH˜¶< t‹Eôëƒ}ü”À¶Àƒmü…ÀuëÍ‹Eô]ÃUH‰åHƒìpH‰}ÈH‰uÀH‰U¸H‰M°L‰E¨L‰M H‹E@Ç H‹E ‹ ‰EàH‹E(‹ ‰EØH‹E0‹ ‰EÜH‹E8‹ ‰EÔL‹MÀL‹E¸H‹MÈH‹U°HuØHEàH}èH‰<$H‰Çèy L‹MÀL‹E¸H‹MÈH‹U°HuÔHEÜH}äH‰<$H‰ÇèQ óEàóMÜ.Áz.Át%óEÔóMØóÁóMÜóUàóÊó^ÁóEøóEØóMÔ.Áz.Át%óEÜóMàóÁóMÔóUØóÊó^ÁóEô‹Eè…Àu‹Eä…À„œ ‹Eè™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu‹Eä™ÁêЃà)Ѓø„° ‹Eè‰ÂÁêÐÑø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu‹Eä‰ÂÁêÐÑø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøtx‹EèP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu‹EäP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøt<‹EèP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu#‹EäP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøuéì ‹Uè‹Eä9ÂuéÝ ‹Eè…Àu‹Eä‰Eüë‹Eè‰Eü‹Eü™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu-H‹EÈó óMàóÁóYEøóMØóXÁóEìH‹EÈ‹ ‰Eð‹Eü‰ÂÁêÐÑø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu-H‹EÀó óMàóÁóYEøóMØóXÁóEìH‹EÀ‹ ‰Eð‹EüP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu-H‹E°ó óMØóÁóYEôóMàóXÁóEðH‹E°‹ ‰Eì‹EüP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu-H‹E¸ó óMØóÁóYEôóMàóXÁóEðH‹E¸‹ ‰Eì‹Eè9Eüu9‹Eð‰Eà‹Eì‰EØL‹MÀL‹E¸H‹MÈH‹U°HuØHEàH}èH‰<$H‰Çèo é‹ýÿÿ‹Eð‰EÜ‹Eì‰EÔL‹MÀL‹E¸H‹MÈH‹U°HuÔHEÜH}äH‰<$H‰Çè6 éRýÿÿ‹EàH‹U¨‰‹EÜH‹U‰‹EØH‹U ‰‹EÔH‹U‰H‹E@Ç ÉÃUH‰åH‰}øH‰uðH‰UèH‰MàL‰EØL‰MÐH‹EÇ H‹EøóH‹Eàó .ÁvH‹EÇ ëH‹Eøó H‹EÐó.Áv
H‹EÇ H‹EðóH‹EØó .ÁvH‹E‹ PH‹E‰ë&H‹Eðó H‹Eèó.ÁwëH‹E‹ PH‹E‰]ÃUH‰åAUATSHìˆ H‰½øþÿÿH‰µðþÿÿH‰•èþÿÿH‰àþÿÿL‰…ØþÿÿL‰Ðþÿÿ‹EpH˜I‰ÄA½ ‹ExH˜I‰ÂA» H‹E






share|improve this question














I need to modify a script which is part of a programme I downloaded. However, when I try to view the script with vim, it is full of symbols, numbers and letters placed randomly. Is there anything I can do to read this script? This is part of the script:



ELF > @ @ J @ 8 @ @ @ @ @ @ À À @ @ @ @ TB TB XB XBa XBa ˜† €B €Ba €Ba à à @ @ Påtd „( „(A „(A ´ ´ Qåtd /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 GNU % 8 ) # 7 $ . ' " , 1 * 6 5 3 / 2 % - 0 

! ( + 4 & ± A ! ® * 9 × ñ « P z â ó ³ í
a ¥
3 ¢ Æ ? s Š X ð é ö # N t 9 Ü M ) Š £ z [ - : S B Ô 3 e Ô P t : € ‘ È ò – É ² ï Û h : û ¦ A ÀFa ) E [ ­ † Á H â d & ÈFa ä û Ð þ ‹ – libgfortran.so.3 _gfortran_st_write_done __gmon_start__ _Jv_RegisterClasses _gfortran_transfer_integer _gfortran_st_read _gfortran_st_inquire _gfortran_set_args _gfortran_iargc _gfortran_st_rewind _ITM_deregisterTMCloneTable _gfortran_pow_i4_i4 _ITM_registerTMCloneTable _gfortran_st_write _gfortran_st_read_done _gfortran_transfer_integer_write _gfortran_compare_string _gfortran_set_options _gfortran_st_close _gfortran_getarg_i4 _gfortran_transfer_character_write _gfortran_transfer_real_write _gfortran_transfer_logical_write _gfortran_stop_string _gfortran_transfer_real _gfortran_st_open _gfortran_transfer_character libm.so.6 truncf cosf sinf sqrtf powf log10f libgcc_s.so.1 __powisf2 libquadmath.so.0 libc.so.6 fflush exit sprintf _IO_putc fopen strncmp strncpy signal getpid calloc strlen memset stdout fputs memcpy fclose stderr fprintf memmove _IO_getc __libc_start_main free /cm/shared/apps/mpich2/3.2/gcc/lib:/cm/shared/apps/fftw/gcc/64/3.3.4/lib/ GLIBC_2.2.5 GCC_4.0.0 GFORTRAN_1.0 GFORTRAN_1.4 p ui  `Z' Î Æ ui  €eù Ø „eù å `Da ÀFa . ÈFa 4 €Da ˆDa Da ˜Da  Da ¨Da °Da ¸Da
ÀDa ÈDa ÐDa
ØDa àDa èDa ðDa øDa Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea (Ea 0Ea 8Ea @Ea HEa PEa XEa `Ea ! hEa " pEa # xEa $ €Ea % ˆEa & Ea ' ˜Ea (  Ea ) ¨Ea * °Ea + ¸Ea , ÀEa - ÈEa / ÐEa 0 ØEa 1 àEa 2 èEa 3 ðEa 5 øEa 6 Fa 7 Hƒìè[ èZ èõ HƒÄÃÿ5z1! ÿ%|1! @ ÿ%z1! h éàÿÿÿÿ%r1! h éÐÿÿÿÿ%j1! h éÀÿÿÿÿ%b1! h é°ÿÿÿÿ%Z1! h é ÿÿÿÿ%R1! h éÿÿÿÿ%J1! h é€ÿÿÿÿ%B1! h épÿÿÿÿ%:1! h é`ÿÿÿÿ%21! h éPÿÿÿÿ%*1! h
é@ÿÿÿÿ%"1! h é0ÿÿÿÿ%1! h é ÿÿÿÿ%1! h
éÿÿÿÿ%
1! h é ÿÿÿÿ%1! h éðþÿÿÿ%ú0! h éàþÿÿÿ%ò0! h éÐþÿÿÿ%ê0! h éÀþÿÿÿ%â0! h é°þÿÿÿ%Ú0! h é þÿÿÿ%Ò0! h éþÿÿÿ%Ê0! h é€þÿÿÿ%Â0! h épþÿÿÿ%º0! h é`þÿÿÿ%²0! h éPþÿÿÿ%ª0! h é@þÿÿÿ%¢0! h é0þÿÿÿ%š0! h é þÿÿÿ%’0! h éþÿÿÿ%Š0! h é þÿÿÿ%‚0! h éðýÿÿÿ%z0! h éàýÿÿÿ%r0! h! éÐýÿÿÿ%j0! h" éÀýÿÿÿ%b0! h# é°ýÿÿÿ%Z0! h$ é ýÿÿÿ%R0! h% éýÿÿÿ%J0! h& é€ýÿÿÿ%B0! h' épýÿÿÿ%:0! h( é`ýÿÿÿ%20! h) éPýÿÿÿ%*0! h* é@ýÿÿÿ%"0! h+ é0ýÿÿÿ%0! h, é ýÿÿÿ%0! h- éýÿÿÿ%
0! h. é ýÿÿÿ%0! h/ éðüÿÿÿ%ú/! h0 éàüÿÿ1íI‰Ñ^H‰âHƒäðPTIÇÀ@A HÇÁPA HÇÇA°@ èWýÿÿôHƒìH‹.! H…ÀtÿÐHƒÄø¿Fa UH-¸Fa HƒøH‰åw]ø H…Àtô]¿¸Fa ÿà€ ¸¸Fa UH-¸Fa HÁøH‰åH‰ÂHÁê?HÐHÑøu]ú H…Òtô]H‰Æ¿¸Fa ÿ†€=ù/! u_UH‰åS»pBa HëhBa HƒìH‹ã/! HÁûHƒëH9Øs$fD HƒÀH‰Å/! ÿÅhBa H‹·/! H9Ørâè5ÿÿÿÆž/! HƒÄÀ Hƒ=0+! t¸ H…ÀtU¿xBa H‰åÿÐ]é+ÿÿÿ é#ÿÿÿUH‰åH‰}è‰uä‹MäHcÉH‰Èº ‹Eä‰EøÇEô ‹Eø‰Eüƒ}ü ~.‹Eü‰EôH‹Uè‹EüƒèH˜¶< uƒ}ü”À¶Àƒmü…ÀuëÒ‹Eô]ÃUH‰åHƒì`H‰}ØH‰uÐH‰UÈH‰MÀL‰E¸D‰M´‹E´H˜I‰ÂA» ‹U´H‹EȉÖH‰Çè ‰EøH‹EØ‹ ‰EôH‹EØó‹Eøó*ÀH‹EÀóóYÂóXÁóEðH‹EÐóH‹EÀóóà óYÂóÈ(ÁóEìH‹EÐóH‹EÀó óXÁóEè¿@A ¸ èTš HMèHUðHuìHEôHÇD$DA HÇ$DA A¹@A A¸@A H‰Ç¸ èZ³ H‹E¸H‰Ç¸ è š ‹Eø…À~4‹T ‰EüLMøLEüH‹MÈH‹UÀH‹uÐH‹EØ‹}´‰<$H‰Ç¸ èV« ÉÃUH‰åH‰}è‰uä‹MäHcÉH‰Èº ‹Eä‰Eø‹Eø‰Eüƒ}ü ~3‹Eü‰EôH‹Uè‹EüƒèH˜¶< t‹Eôëƒ}ü”À¶Àƒmü…ÀuëÍ‹Eô]ÃUH‰åHƒìpH‰}ÈH‰uÀH‰U¸H‰M°L‰E¨L‰M H‹E@Ç H‹E ‹ ‰EàH‹E(‹ ‰EØH‹E0‹ ‰EÜH‹E8‹ ‰EÔL‹MÀL‹E¸H‹MÈH‹U°HuØHEàH}èH‰<$H‰Çèy L‹MÀL‹E¸H‹MÈH‹U°HuÔHEÜH}äH‰<$H‰ÇèQ óEàóMÜ.Áz.Át%óEÔóMØóÁóMÜóUàóÊó^ÁóEøóEØóMÔ.Áz.Át%óEÜóMàóÁóMÔóUØóÊó^ÁóEô‹Eè…Àu‹Eä…À„œ ‹Eè™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu‹Eä™ÁêЃà)Ѓø„° ‹Eè‰ÂÁêÐÑø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu‹Eä‰ÂÁêÐÑø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøtx‹EèP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu‹EäP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøt<‹EèP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu#‹EäP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøuéì ‹Uè‹Eä9ÂuéÝ ‹Eè…Àu‹Eä‰Eüë‹Eè‰Eü‹Eü™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu-H‹EÈó óMàóÁóYEøóMØóXÁóEìH‹EÈ‹ ‰Eð‹Eü‰ÂÁêÐÑø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu-H‹EÀó óMàóÁóYEøóMØóXÁóEìH‹EÀ‹ ‰Eð‹EüP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu-H‹E°ó óMØóÁóYEôóMàóXÁóEðH‹E°‹ ‰Eì‹EüP…ÀHÂÁø™ÁêЃà)Ѓøu-H‹E¸ó óMØóÁóYEôóMàóXÁóEðH‹E¸‹ ‰Eì‹Eè9Eüu9‹Eð‰Eà‹Eì‰EØL‹MÀL‹E¸H‹MÈH‹U°HuØHEàH}èH‰<$H‰Çèo é‹ýÿÿ‹Eð‰EÜ‹Eì‰EÔL‹MÀL‹E¸H‹MÈH‹U°HuÔHEÜH}äH‰<$H‰Çè6 éRýÿÿ‹EàH‹U¨‰‹EÜH‹U‰‹EØH‹U ‰‹EÔH‹U‰H‹E@Ç ÉÃUH‰åH‰}øH‰uðH‰UèH‰MàL‰EØL‰MÐH‹EÇ H‹EøóH‹Eàó .ÁvH‹EÇ ëH‹Eøó H‹EÐó.Áv
H‹EÇ H‹EðóH‹EØó .ÁvH‹E‹ PH‹E‰ë&H‹Eðó H‹Eèó.ÁwëH‹E‹ PH‹E‰]ÃUH‰åAUATSHìˆ H‰½øþÿÿH‰µðþÿÿH‰•èþÿÿH‰àþÿÿL‰…ØþÿÿL‰Ðþÿÿ‹EpH˜I‰ÄA½ ‹ExH˜I‰ÂA» H‹E








share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 1 at 11:49









GAD3R

22.7k154895




22.7k154895










asked Sep 1 at 9:25









Chantelle Dimech

433




433







  • 21




    welcome to U&L, this is not a script but a binary (as seen by ELF string). to modify it, you need to edit sources, and recompile it.
    – Archemar
    Sep 1 at 9:28






  • 4




    fortran, looks like.
    – mikeserv
    Sep 1 at 9:48






  • 2




    @mikeserv How can you tell?
    – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
    Sep 1 at 12:59






  • 7




    @ThorbjørnRavnAndersen If you scroll to the right there’s some strings like libgfortran.so.3 and _gfortran_transfer_integer.
    – NobodyNada
    Sep 1 at 14:26






  • 12




    I'm curious, why did you think this was a script?
    – pipe
    Sep 1 at 21:50












  • 21




    welcome to U&L, this is not a script but a binary (as seen by ELF string). to modify it, you need to edit sources, and recompile it.
    – Archemar
    Sep 1 at 9:28






  • 4




    fortran, looks like.
    – mikeserv
    Sep 1 at 9:48






  • 2




    @mikeserv How can you tell?
    – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
    Sep 1 at 12:59






  • 7




    @ThorbjørnRavnAndersen If you scroll to the right there’s some strings like libgfortran.so.3 and _gfortran_transfer_integer.
    – NobodyNada
    Sep 1 at 14:26






  • 12




    I'm curious, why did you think this was a script?
    – pipe
    Sep 1 at 21:50







21




21




welcome to U&L, this is not a script but a binary (as seen by ELF string). to modify it, you need to edit sources, and recompile it.
– Archemar
Sep 1 at 9:28




welcome to U&L, this is not a script but a binary (as seen by ELF string). to modify it, you need to edit sources, and recompile it.
– Archemar
Sep 1 at 9:28




4




4




fortran, looks like.
– mikeserv
Sep 1 at 9:48




fortran, looks like.
– mikeserv
Sep 1 at 9:48




2




2




@mikeserv How can you tell?
– Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Sep 1 at 12:59




@mikeserv How can you tell?
– Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Sep 1 at 12:59




7




7




@ThorbjørnRavnAndersen If you scroll to the right there’s some strings like libgfortran.so.3 and _gfortran_transfer_integer.
– NobodyNada
Sep 1 at 14:26




@ThorbjørnRavnAndersen If you scroll to the right there’s some strings like libgfortran.so.3 and _gfortran_transfer_integer.
– NobodyNada
Sep 1 at 14:26




12




12




I'm curious, why did you think this was a script?
– pipe
Sep 1 at 21:50




I'm curious, why did you think this was a script?
– pipe
Sep 1 at 21:50










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
41
down vote













The "script" is not actually a script at all, but a compiled executable binary file. This is evident from the fact that it's not a text file and that it contains an ELF header.



This means that to change it, you would have to locate its source code (which may not be available on your machine, and in some cases it may not available publicly at all), change it, and recompile the binary executable.



How you do this depends on where you got the program from, what programming language its source is written in (probably Fortran using MPI judging from the library names and paths present in the binary output), and what build system it uses to build.



This may require installing one or several additional pieces of software on your system for rebuilding the executable, along with any dependencies (libraries and headers) that the source may be using.






share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    3
    down vote













    If you don't have the original source code and you are desperate, you can also decompile (reverse engineer) the executable file. It will give you something like assembler or c-code, maybe even fortran.



    But you won't get the original source code from it, just some basic code with simple instructions, which compiles into the same binary as the original code.



    Might need lots of research to understand it and fix what you want to change. With a lot of refactoring, renaming and extracting functions, you could even get a usuable source code for future development or porting to another platform.



    convert executable back to C source code






    share|improve this answer




















    • Decompiling and reverse engineering are two very different techniques. To begin with, if Wikipedia can be taken at face value, the former is an automated process, whereas the latter is a manual process. This agrees well with the ways I've seen the terms used in practice.
      – Michael Kjörling
      Sep 2 at 15:53










    • @MichaelKjörling feel fre to edit the answer, I know almost nothing about it. I only knew that it is possible, other people having the same question might not, so I added that information.
      – John Mc G.
      Sep 2 at 23:08










    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466209%2fi-need-to-modify-a-script-but-its-full-of-gibberish%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    41
    down vote













    The "script" is not actually a script at all, but a compiled executable binary file. This is evident from the fact that it's not a text file and that it contains an ELF header.



    This means that to change it, you would have to locate its source code (which may not be available on your machine, and in some cases it may not available publicly at all), change it, and recompile the binary executable.



    How you do this depends on where you got the program from, what programming language its source is written in (probably Fortran using MPI judging from the library names and paths present in the binary output), and what build system it uses to build.



    This may require installing one or several additional pieces of software on your system for rebuilding the executable, along with any dependencies (libraries and headers) that the source may be using.






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      41
      down vote













      The "script" is not actually a script at all, but a compiled executable binary file. This is evident from the fact that it's not a text file and that it contains an ELF header.



      This means that to change it, you would have to locate its source code (which may not be available on your machine, and in some cases it may not available publicly at all), change it, and recompile the binary executable.



      How you do this depends on where you got the program from, what programming language its source is written in (probably Fortran using MPI judging from the library names and paths present in the binary output), and what build system it uses to build.



      This may require installing one or several additional pieces of software on your system for rebuilding the executable, along with any dependencies (libraries and headers) that the source may be using.






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        41
        down vote










        up vote
        41
        down vote









        The "script" is not actually a script at all, but a compiled executable binary file. This is evident from the fact that it's not a text file and that it contains an ELF header.



        This means that to change it, you would have to locate its source code (which may not be available on your machine, and in some cases it may not available publicly at all), change it, and recompile the binary executable.



        How you do this depends on where you got the program from, what programming language its source is written in (probably Fortran using MPI judging from the library names and paths present in the binary output), and what build system it uses to build.



        This may require installing one or several additional pieces of software on your system for rebuilding the executable, along with any dependencies (libraries and headers) that the source may be using.






        share|improve this answer














        The "script" is not actually a script at all, but a compiled executable binary file. This is evident from the fact that it's not a text file and that it contains an ELF header.



        This means that to change it, you would have to locate its source code (which may not be available on your machine, and in some cases it may not available publicly at all), change it, and recompile the binary executable.



        How you do this depends on where you got the program from, what programming language its source is written in (probably Fortran using MPI judging from the library names and paths present in the binary output), and what build system it uses to build.



        This may require installing one or several additional pieces of software on your system for rebuilding the executable, along with any dependencies (libraries and headers) that the source may be using.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Sep 2 at 8:44

























        answered Sep 1 at 9:41









        Kusalananda

        105k14209326




        105k14209326






















            up vote
            3
            down vote













            If you don't have the original source code and you are desperate, you can also decompile (reverse engineer) the executable file. It will give you something like assembler or c-code, maybe even fortran.



            But you won't get the original source code from it, just some basic code with simple instructions, which compiles into the same binary as the original code.



            Might need lots of research to understand it and fix what you want to change. With a lot of refactoring, renaming and extracting functions, you could even get a usuable source code for future development or porting to another platform.



            convert executable back to C source code






            share|improve this answer




















            • Decompiling and reverse engineering are two very different techniques. To begin with, if Wikipedia can be taken at face value, the former is an automated process, whereas the latter is a manual process. This agrees well with the ways I've seen the terms used in practice.
              – Michael Kjörling
              Sep 2 at 15:53










            • @MichaelKjörling feel fre to edit the answer, I know almost nothing about it. I only knew that it is possible, other people having the same question might not, so I added that information.
              – John Mc G.
              Sep 2 at 23:08














            up vote
            3
            down vote













            If you don't have the original source code and you are desperate, you can also decompile (reverse engineer) the executable file. It will give you something like assembler or c-code, maybe even fortran.



            But you won't get the original source code from it, just some basic code with simple instructions, which compiles into the same binary as the original code.



            Might need lots of research to understand it and fix what you want to change. With a lot of refactoring, renaming and extracting functions, you could even get a usuable source code for future development or porting to another platform.



            convert executable back to C source code






            share|improve this answer




















            • Decompiling and reverse engineering are two very different techniques. To begin with, if Wikipedia can be taken at face value, the former is an automated process, whereas the latter is a manual process. This agrees well with the ways I've seen the terms used in practice.
              – Michael Kjörling
              Sep 2 at 15:53










            • @MichaelKjörling feel fre to edit the answer, I know almost nothing about it. I only knew that it is possible, other people having the same question might not, so I added that information.
              – John Mc G.
              Sep 2 at 23:08












            up vote
            3
            down vote










            up vote
            3
            down vote









            If you don't have the original source code and you are desperate, you can also decompile (reverse engineer) the executable file. It will give you something like assembler or c-code, maybe even fortran.



            But you won't get the original source code from it, just some basic code with simple instructions, which compiles into the same binary as the original code.



            Might need lots of research to understand it and fix what you want to change. With a lot of refactoring, renaming and extracting functions, you could even get a usuable source code for future development or porting to another platform.



            convert executable back to C source code






            share|improve this answer












            If you don't have the original source code and you are desperate, you can also decompile (reverse engineer) the executable file. It will give you something like assembler or c-code, maybe even fortran.



            But you won't get the original source code from it, just some basic code with simple instructions, which compiles into the same binary as the original code.



            Might need lots of research to understand it and fix what you want to change. With a lot of refactoring, renaming and extracting functions, you could even get a usuable source code for future development or porting to another platform.



            convert executable back to C source code







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Sep 2 at 0:28









            John Mc G.

            311




            311











            • Decompiling and reverse engineering are two very different techniques. To begin with, if Wikipedia can be taken at face value, the former is an automated process, whereas the latter is a manual process. This agrees well with the ways I've seen the terms used in practice.
              – Michael Kjörling
              Sep 2 at 15:53










            • @MichaelKjörling feel fre to edit the answer, I know almost nothing about it. I only knew that it is possible, other people having the same question might not, so I added that information.
              – John Mc G.
              Sep 2 at 23:08
















            • Decompiling and reverse engineering are two very different techniques. To begin with, if Wikipedia can be taken at face value, the former is an automated process, whereas the latter is a manual process. This agrees well with the ways I've seen the terms used in practice.
              – Michael Kjörling
              Sep 2 at 15:53










            • @MichaelKjörling feel fre to edit the answer, I know almost nothing about it. I only knew that it is possible, other people having the same question might not, so I added that information.
              – John Mc G.
              Sep 2 at 23:08















            Decompiling and reverse engineering are two very different techniques. To begin with, if Wikipedia can be taken at face value, the former is an automated process, whereas the latter is a manual process. This agrees well with the ways I've seen the terms used in practice.
            – Michael Kjörling
            Sep 2 at 15:53




            Decompiling and reverse engineering are two very different techniques. To begin with, if Wikipedia can be taken at face value, the former is an automated process, whereas the latter is a manual process. This agrees well with the ways I've seen the terms used in practice.
            – Michael Kjörling
            Sep 2 at 15:53












            @MichaelKjörling feel fre to edit the answer, I know almost nothing about it. I only knew that it is possible, other people having the same question might not, so I added that information.
            – John Mc G.
            Sep 2 at 23:08




            @MichaelKjörling feel fre to edit the answer, I know almost nothing about it. I only knew that it is possible, other people having the same question might not, so I added that information.
            – John Mc G.
            Sep 2 at 23:08

















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466209%2fi-need-to-modify-a-script-but-its-full-of-gibberish%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What does second last employer means? [closed]

            List of Gilmore Girls characters

            Confectionery