What are the limitations of the 'circumstance' I can choose to trigger the Contingency spell?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
11
down vote

favorite
1












The contingency spell description states:




Instead, it takes effect when a certain circumstance occurs. You describe that circumstance when you cast the two spells.




There is nothing written that requires the circumstance is perceivable, in contrast with how you can Ready an action. It also does not limit the distance. It also does not limit the details you could come up with (since 10 minutes is pretty long time). Possible scenario on my mind:




When the King Leo XIII died. I wouldn't have known since I'm so far away, but when the Message cantrip takes effect, whispering my previous Message, now I know he is dead.




I've just realized that this spell is insanely powerful and can be abused if not properly limited. What are the limitations, anyway?







share|improve this question






















  • With the message example, would you be whispering to yourself since the contingent spell takes effect on you?
    – V2Blast
    Sep 3 at 17:12






  • 4




    @V2Blast yes. Message tells you to point on one creature, and you can point on yourself. Usually, this is pointless, because you would hear the whisper as you speak it, but in this case it will be delayed until the circumstance is met.
    – Vylix
    Sep 3 at 17:48
















up vote
11
down vote

favorite
1












The contingency spell description states:




Instead, it takes effect when a certain circumstance occurs. You describe that circumstance when you cast the two spells.




There is nothing written that requires the circumstance is perceivable, in contrast with how you can Ready an action. It also does not limit the distance. It also does not limit the details you could come up with (since 10 minutes is pretty long time). Possible scenario on my mind:




When the King Leo XIII died. I wouldn't have known since I'm so far away, but when the Message cantrip takes effect, whispering my previous Message, now I know he is dead.




I've just realized that this spell is insanely powerful and can be abused if not properly limited. What are the limitations, anyway?







share|improve this question






















  • With the message example, would you be whispering to yourself since the contingent spell takes effect on you?
    – V2Blast
    Sep 3 at 17:12






  • 4




    @V2Blast yes. Message tells you to point on one creature, and you can point on yourself. Usually, this is pointless, because you would hear the whisper as you speak it, but in this case it will be delayed until the circumstance is met.
    – Vylix
    Sep 3 at 17:48












up vote
11
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
11
down vote

favorite
1






1





The contingency spell description states:




Instead, it takes effect when a certain circumstance occurs. You describe that circumstance when you cast the two spells.




There is nothing written that requires the circumstance is perceivable, in contrast with how you can Ready an action. It also does not limit the distance. It also does not limit the details you could come up with (since 10 minutes is pretty long time). Possible scenario on my mind:




When the King Leo XIII died. I wouldn't have known since I'm so far away, but when the Message cantrip takes effect, whispering my previous Message, now I know he is dead.




I've just realized that this spell is insanely powerful and can be abused if not properly limited. What are the limitations, anyway?







share|improve this question














The contingency spell description states:




Instead, it takes effect when a certain circumstance occurs. You describe that circumstance when you cast the two spells.




There is nothing written that requires the circumstance is perceivable, in contrast with how you can Ready an action. It also does not limit the distance. It also does not limit the details you could come up with (since 10 minutes is pretty long time). Possible scenario on my mind:




When the King Leo XIII died. I wouldn't have known since I'm so far away, but when the Message cantrip takes effect, whispering my previous Message, now I know he is dead.




I've just realized that this spell is insanely powerful and can be abused if not properly limited. What are the limitations, anyway?









share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 3 at 17:09

























asked Sep 3 at 16:16









Vylix

5,76112187




5,76112187











  • With the message example, would you be whispering to yourself since the contingent spell takes effect on you?
    – V2Blast
    Sep 3 at 17:12






  • 4




    @V2Blast yes. Message tells you to point on one creature, and you can point on yourself. Usually, this is pointless, because you would hear the whisper as you speak it, but in this case it will be delayed until the circumstance is met.
    – Vylix
    Sep 3 at 17:48
















  • With the message example, would you be whispering to yourself since the contingent spell takes effect on you?
    – V2Blast
    Sep 3 at 17:12






  • 4




    @V2Blast yes. Message tells you to point on one creature, and you can point on yourself. Usually, this is pointless, because you would hear the whisper as you speak it, but in this case it will be delayed until the circumstance is met.
    – Vylix
    Sep 3 at 17:48















With the message example, would you be whispering to yourself since the contingent spell takes effect on you?
– V2Blast
Sep 3 at 17:12




With the message example, would you be whispering to yourself since the contingent spell takes effect on you?
– V2Blast
Sep 3 at 17:12




4




4




@V2Blast yes. Message tells you to point on one creature, and you can point on yourself. Usually, this is pointless, because you would hear the whisper as you speak it, but in this case it will be delayed until the circumstance is met.
– Vylix
Sep 3 at 17:48




@V2Blast yes. Message tells you to point on one creature, and you can point on yourself. Usually, this is pointless, because you would hear the whisper as you speak it, but in this case it will be delayed until the circumstance is met.
– Vylix
Sep 3 at 17:48










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
9
down vote













There are no qualifiers on the "circumstance" in the spell, and "circumstance" is an awfully broad term in plain English. It can mean literally the things around you, or metaphorically so, or it can be anything which is connected to and influences another thing.



From Merriam-Webster:




1a: a condition, fact, or event accompanying, conditioning, or determining another




In the case of the spell, the "another" is the contingent spell. So, the "circumstance" is any condition, fact, or event that you by the magic of this spell link to the activation of that other spell. (That is, you describe a condition, fact, or event which — in this case — determines the activation of other.)



This leaves the DM to determine exactly what is a reasonable trigger; it is a 6th-level spell, which is fairly powerful, but not invincible. I'd look to true seeing (also 6th level) and scrying (5th) for some bounds to reasonableness.



Of course, it's also worth consider the example given — water breathing "when you are engulfed in water or a similar liquid" — which is clearly both local and immediate. There's no clear requirement of that, though, and as a DM I'd allow it to work based on things that happen far away. Having something happen when a wizard's lab is invaded, or sure, notifies the suspicious grand vizier when the king dies seems fun for story to me. And, it's still got an expensive component (even if not consumed), along with the opportunity cost of not allowing another more immediate contingency to be active.



On the other hand, I wouldn't allow probing broad truths of the metaverse by testing if facts are, indeed, facts — not by any particular rule but just because that seems out of scope. However, there's definitely room in the spell for another DM to rule more broadly.






share|improve this answer






















  • @Vylix Good point. Hyperbole got away from me there. I'll tone it down.
    – mattdm
    Sep 4 at 3:33

















up vote
-1
down vote













By the way the effect is described, it’s limited to the situation immediately around you. That’s what “circumstance” means.




a condition, detail, part, or attribute, with respect to time, place, manner, agent, etc., that accompanies, determines, or modifies a fact or event; a modifying or influencing factor:
Do not judge his behavior without considering every circumstance.




The circumstances of the spell are the details, parts, etc. affecting where the ongoing contingency spell exists. It doesn’t include other places, events, or times. (No sensing events in the future, across a continent, or on another Earth!)






share|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "122"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131054%2fwhat-are-the-limitations-of-the-circumstance-i-can-choose-to-trigger-the-conti%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    9
    down vote













    There are no qualifiers on the "circumstance" in the spell, and "circumstance" is an awfully broad term in plain English. It can mean literally the things around you, or metaphorically so, or it can be anything which is connected to and influences another thing.



    From Merriam-Webster:




    1a: a condition, fact, or event accompanying, conditioning, or determining another




    In the case of the spell, the "another" is the contingent spell. So, the "circumstance" is any condition, fact, or event that you by the magic of this spell link to the activation of that other spell. (That is, you describe a condition, fact, or event which — in this case — determines the activation of other.)



    This leaves the DM to determine exactly what is a reasonable trigger; it is a 6th-level spell, which is fairly powerful, but not invincible. I'd look to true seeing (also 6th level) and scrying (5th) for some bounds to reasonableness.



    Of course, it's also worth consider the example given — water breathing "when you are engulfed in water or a similar liquid" — which is clearly both local and immediate. There's no clear requirement of that, though, and as a DM I'd allow it to work based on things that happen far away. Having something happen when a wizard's lab is invaded, or sure, notifies the suspicious grand vizier when the king dies seems fun for story to me. And, it's still got an expensive component (even if not consumed), along with the opportunity cost of not allowing another more immediate contingency to be active.



    On the other hand, I wouldn't allow probing broad truths of the metaverse by testing if facts are, indeed, facts — not by any particular rule but just because that seems out of scope. However, there's definitely room in the spell for another DM to rule more broadly.






    share|improve this answer






















    • @Vylix Good point. Hyperbole got away from me there. I'll tone it down.
      – mattdm
      Sep 4 at 3:33














    up vote
    9
    down vote













    There are no qualifiers on the "circumstance" in the spell, and "circumstance" is an awfully broad term in plain English. It can mean literally the things around you, or metaphorically so, or it can be anything which is connected to and influences another thing.



    From Merriam-Webster:




    1a: a condition, fact, or event accompanying, conditioning, or determining another




    In the case of the spell, the "another" is the contingent spell. So, the "circumstance" is any condition, fact, or event that you by the magic of this spell link to the activation of that other spell. (That is, you describe a condition, fact, or event which — in this case — determines the activation of other.)



    This leaves the DM to determine exactly what is a reasonable trigger; it is a 6th-level spell, which is fairly powerful, but not invincible. I'd look to true seeing (also 6th level) and scrying (5th) for some bounds to reasonableness.



    Of course, it's also worth consider the example given — water breathing "when you are engulfed in water or a similar liquid" — which is clearly both local and immediate. There's no clear requirement of that, though, and as a DM I'd allow it to work based on things that happen far away. Having something happen when a wizard's lab is invaded, or sure, notifies the suspicious grand vizier when the king dies seems fun for story to me. And, it's still got an expensive component (even if not consumed), along with the opportunity cost of not allowing another more immediate contingency to be active.



    On the other hand, I wouldn't allow probing broad truths of the metaverse by testing if facts are, indeed, facts — not by any particular rule but just because that seems out of scope. However, there's definitely room in the spell for another DM to rule more broadly.






    share|improve this answer






















    • @Vylix Good point. Hyperbole got away from me there. I'll tone it down.
      – mattdm
      Sep 4 at 3:33












    up vote
    9
    down vote










    up vote
    9
    down vote









    There are no qualifiers on the "circumstance" in the spell, and "circumstance" is an awfully broad term in plain English. It can mean literally the things around you, or metaphorically so, or it can be anything which is connected to and influences another thing.



    From Merriam-Webster:




    1a: a condition, fact, or event accompanying, conditioning, or determining another




    In the case of the spell, the "another" is the contingent spell. So, the "circumstance" is any condition, fact, or event that you by the magic of this spell link to the activation of that other spell. (That is, you describe a condition, fact, or event which — in this case — determines the activation of other.)



    This leaves the DM to determine exactly what is a reasonable trigger; it is a 6th-level spell, which is fairly powerful, but not invincible. I'd look to true seeing (also 6th level) and scrying (5th) for some bounds to reasonableness.



    Of course, it's also worth consider the example given — water breathing "when you are engulfed in water or a similar liquid" — which is clearly both local and immediate. There's no clear requirement of that, though, and as a DM I'd allow it to work based on things that happen far away. Having something happen when a wizard's lab is invaded, or sure, notifies the suspicious grand vizier when the king dies seems fun for story to me. And, it's still got an expensive component (even if not consumed), along with the opportunity cost of not allowing another more immediate contingency to be active.



    On the other hand, I wouldn't allow probing broad truths of the metaverse by testing if facts are, indeed, facts — not by any particular rule but just because that seems out of scope. However, there's definitely room in the spell for another DM to rule more broadly.






    share|improve this answer














    There are no qualifiers on the "circumstance" in the spell, and "circumstance" is an awfully broad term in plain English. It can mean literally the things around you, or metaphorically so, or it can be anything which is connected to and influences another thing.



    From Merriam-Webster:




    1a: a condition, fact, or event accompanying, conditioning, or determining another




    In the case of the spell, the "another" is the contingent spell. So, the "circumstance" is any condition, fact, or event that you by the magic of this spell link to the activation of that other spell. (That is, you describe a condition, fact, or event which — in this case — determines the activation of other.)



    This leaves the DM to determine exactly what is a reasonable trigger; it is a 6th-level spell, which is fairly powerful, but not invincible. I'd look to true seeing (also 6th level) and scrying (5th) for some bounds to reasonableness.



    Of course, it's also worth consider the example given — water breathing "when you are engulfed in water or a similar liquid" — which is clearly both local and immediate. There's no clear requirement of that, though, and as a DM I'd allow it to work based on things that happen far away. Having something happen when a wizard's lab is invaded, or sure, notifies the suspicious grand vizier when the king dies seems fun for story to me. And, it's still got an expensive component (even if not consumed), along with the opportunity cost of not allowing another more immediate contingency to be active.



    On the other hand, I wouldn't allow probing broad truths of the metaverse by testing if facts are, indeed, facts — not by any particular rule but just because that seems out of scope. However, there's definitely room in the spell for another DM to rule more broadly.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Sep 4 at 3:38

























    answered Sep 3 at 19:28









    mattdm

    14.1k765112




    14.1k765112











    • @Vylix Good point. Hyperbole got away from me there. I'll tone it down.
      – mattdm
      Sep 4 at 3:33
















    • @Vylix Good point. Hyperbole got away from me there. I'll tone it down.
      – mattdm
      Sep 4 at 3:33















    @Vylix Good point. Hyperbole got away from me there. I'll tone it down.
    – mattdm
    Sep 4 at 3:33




    @Vylix Good point. Hyperbole got away from me there. I'll tone it down.
    – mattdm
    Sep 4 at 3:33












    up vote
    -1
    down vote













    By the way the effect is described, it’s limited to the situation immediately around you. That’s what “circumstance” means.




    a condition, detail, part, or attribute, with respect to time, place, manner, agent, etc., that accompanies, determines, or modifies a fact or event; a modifying or influencing factor:
    Do not judge his behavior without considering every circumstance.




    The circumstances of the spell are the details, parts, etc. affecting where the ongoing contingency spell exists. It doesn’t include other places, events, or times. (No sensing events in the future, across a continent, or on another Earth!)






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      -1
      down vote













      By the way the effect is described, it’s limited to the situation immediately around you. That’s what “circumstance” means.




      a condition, detail, part, or attribute, with respect to time, place, manner, agent, etc., that accompanies, determines, or modifies a fact or event; a modifying or influencing factor:
      Do not judge his behavior without considering every circumstance.




      The circumstances of the spell are the details, parts, etc. affecting where the ongoing contingency spell exists. It doesn’t include other places, events, or times. (No sensing events in the future, across a continent, or on another Earth!)






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        -1
        down vote










        up vote
        -1
        down vote









        By the way the effect is described, it’s limited to the situation immediately around you. That’s what “circumstance” means.




        a condition, detail, part, or attribute, with respect to time, place, manner, agent, etc., that accompanies, determines, or modifies a fact or event; a modifying or influencing factor:
        Do not judge his behavior without considering every circumstance.




        The circumstances of the spell are the details, parts, etc. affecting where the ongoing contingency spell exists. It doesn’t include other places, events, or times. (No sensing events in the future, across a continent, or on another Earth!)






        share|improve this answer












        By the way the effect is described, it’s limited to the situation immediately around you. That’s what “circumstance” means.




        a condition, detail, part, or attribute, with respect to time, place, manner, agent, etc., that accompanies, determines, or modifies a fact or event; a modifying or influencing factor:
        Do not judge his behavior without considering every circumstance.




        The circumstances of the spell are the details, parts, etc. affecting where the ongoing contingency spell exists. It doesn’t include other places, events, or times. (No sensing events in the future, across a continent, or on another Earth!)







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Sep 3 at 16:53









        SevenSidedDie♦

        199k25631912




        199k25631912



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131054%2fwhat-are-the-limitations-of-the-circumstance-i-can-choose-to-trigger-the-conti%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What does second last employer means? [closed]

            Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

            One-line joke