Mixing
How do I explain not actively looking for a job until a year after I was laid off?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
23
down vote
favorite
I was laid off from a quality assurance job about year ago. I was never actively looking for work until recently (I was living off savings). During that time, I really just wanted to relax and catch up on movies/books/video games I've always wanted to watch/read/play but never got around to doing. I also did a bit of traveling and worked on a few small, open source programming projects. Now that I'm done with that, I want to start working again.
If an employer asks what I've been doing with my time, how do I explain myself without looking like a total bum?
resume interviewing employer-relations
asked Jul 12 '12 at 19:51
Ron
11613
add a comment |Â
up vote
23
down vote
favorite
I was laid off from a quality assurance job about year ago. I was never actively looking for work until recently (I was living off savings). During that time, I really just wanted to relax and catch up on movies/books/video games I've always wanted to watch/read/play but never got around to doing. I also did a bit of traveling and worked on a few small, open source programming projects. Now that I'm done with that, I want to start working again.
If an employer asks what I've been doing with my time, how do I explain myself without looking like a total bum?
resume interviewing employer-relations
asked Jul 12 '12 at 19:51
Ron
11613
it is not wrong to say that because of market conditions company downsized.
– EL Yusubov
Jul 13 '12 at 0:52
1
I can understand a few months but I personally feel that it is a tad irresponsible to use savings to slack for a whole year. With that being said I wouldn't hold it against you if I were hiring for a position and I felt you were qualified.
– maple_shaft
Jul 13 '12 at 12:13
add a comment |Â
up vote
23
down vote
favorite
up vote
23
down vote
favorite
I was laid off from a quality assurance job about year ago. I was never actively looking for work until recently (I was living off savings). During that time, I really just wanted to relax and catch up on movies/books/video games I've always wanted to watch/read/play but never got around to doing. I also did a bit of traveling and worked on a few small, open source programming projects. Now that I'm done with that, I want to start working again.
If an employer asks what I've been doing with my time, how do I explain myself without looking like a total bum?
resume interviewing employer-relations
asked Jul 12 '12 at 19:51
Ron
11613
I was laid off from a quality assurance job about year ago. I was never actively looking for work until recently (I was living off savings). During that time, I really just wanted to relax and catch up on movies/books/video games I've always wanted to watch/read/play but never got around to doing. I also did a bit of traveling and worked on a few small, open source programming projects. Now that I'm done with that, I want to start working again.
If an employer asks what I've been doing with my time, how do I explain myself without looking like a total bum?
resume interviewing employer-relations
asked Jul 12 '12 at 19:51
Ron
11613
asked Jul 12 '12 at 19:51
Ron
11613
asked Jul 12 '12 at 19:51
Ron
11613
asked Jul 12 '12 at 19:51
Ron
11613
11613
it is not wrong to say that because of market conditions company downsized.
– EL Yusubov
Jul 13 '12 at 0:52
1
I can understand a few months but I personally feel that it is a tad irresponsible to use savings to slack for a whole year. With that being said I wouldn't hold it against you if I were hiring for a position and I felt you were qualified.
– maple_shaft
Jul 13 '12 at 12:13
add a comment |Â
it is not wrong to say that because of market conditions company downsized.
– EL Yusubov
Jul 13 '12 at 0:52
1
I can understand a few months but I personally feel that it is a tad irresponsible to use savings to slack for a whole year. With that being said I wouldn't hold it against you if I were hiring for a position and I felt you were qualified.
– maple_shaft
Jul 13 '12 at 12:13
it is not wrong to say that because of market conditions company downsized.
– EL Yusubov
Jul 13 '12 at 0:52
it is not wrong to say that because of market conditions company downsized.
– EL Yusubov
Jul 13 '12 at 0:52
1
1
I can understand a few months but I personally feel that it is a tad irresponsible to use savings to slack for a whole year. With that being said I wouldn't hold it against you if I were hiring for a position and I felt you were qualified.
– maple_shaft
Jul 13 '12 at 12:13
I can understand a few months but I personally feel that it is a tad irresponsible to use savings to slack for a whole year. With that being said I wouldn't hold it against you if I were hiring for a position and I felt you were qualified.
– maple_shaft
Jul 13 '12 at 12:13
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
22
down vote
I would have phrased it as something positive, because I assume that it was.
When I left Company X, I had enough savings for the opportunity of a lifetime.
And then briefly portray the best parts in a good light.
I take inspiration from Tim Ferris, the author of "The 4 Hour Workweek", who briefly mentions just such circumstances.
edited Jul 13 '12 at 10:59
Spoike
1,9411520
answered Jul 12 '12 at 20:04
Letharion
95011021
2
+1 "Portray the best parts in a good light". People tend to forget the "productive" activities they did during their down time which is really a plus, e.g. in OP's case working on open source programming projects.
– Spoike
Jul 13 '12 at 10:43
@Spoike, out of curiosity, what's with the link going through so.com before going to amazon? :)
– Letharion
Jul 13 '12 at 12:12
It seems stackexchange sites converts links that go to Amazon... probably so that they can get some referrer bonus from them or something.
– Spoike
Jul 13 '12 at 12:55
Ah, so it wasn't intentional. Cool, I'll start posting a lot of amazon links to support SO then ;)
– Letharion
Jul 13 '12 at 14:19
add a comment |Â
up vote
16
down vote
Really, what's wrong with an honest answer?
You saved and spent sensibly. Spending a year out of the workplace while traveling on your own money and working on personal projects does not make you a 'bum'!
If a company won't hire you because you gave an honest answer to a personal question that's non-relevant to their requirements, then do you really want to work there in the first place?
answered Jul 12 '12 at 20:54
Jim In Texas
3,9851222
1
then do you really want to work there in the first place? - yes they are a great employer...
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 13 '12 at 12:56
3
@Chad: "Great employer" is such a loose term. Even if an employer are highly regarded by outsiders does not necessarily equate to great workplace or company culture that one would like to participate in. Potential employers who don't respond well to honest answers should be seen as a huge red flag, as in borderline exploitative, which should be considered if you're looking.
– Spoike
Jul 16 '12 at 10:53
@Spoike - My point was that just because you have to get past the troll on the bridge sometimes it is worth it to get to the other side.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 16 '12 at 12:51
1
@Chad - I understand that point. My point is that I have cynically low tolerance for trolls. If there are other bridges in the vicinity that are devoid of trolls then I'd rather burn the bridge down with the troll under it earlier than to get eaten up by it. How's that for analogy? :-D My rationale is that recruiters and HR drones have a responsibility to act appropriately, ethically and professionally on the behalf of their customer (who is the employer). This outlook may fail if all bridges have trolls on them, but in my experience that situation is a quite rare.
– Spoike
Jul 16 '12 at 14:02
1
If the OP wasn't hired because of his honest answer, it is most probable that the real reason he wasn't hired was just that the interviewer didn't like him personally and seized his year as a 'bum' as an excuse. It is impossible for me to get my head around a company that would say "Ron did well on his interview and has the qualifications we're looking for, but darn it, he was a bum for a year so we have to pass". And someone thinks that is a 'great company'!
– Jim In Texas
Jul 17 '12 at 1:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
I subscribe to Steve Jobs' philosophy about innovation: it comes from having a lot of experiences and then being able to "connect the dots." Given that you have built up a number of experiences in the past year, I would view your experiences as an asset if I were on the other side of the table. I would expect that you'd a more nimble collaborator, and somebody I'd want to work with. I would also expect that your batteries be recharged, so I wouldn't have to worry about burn-out in the near future. Bottom-line: Give an honest answer!
answered Jul 13 '12 at 16:47
jdb1a1
1,77911419
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Sounds like you are someone who worked hard enough to save a year's wages. However, if you collected unemployement when you could be working, that's a tough sell. Demonstrate what you've learned from the open source project.
Hopefully, you've learned some strategies to not get burned-out in your next job or maybe focus on project work with limited time-frames.
Why is it a tough sell if the OP collected unemployment? To me, that's just smart, since the unemployment would allow him to extend his savings and he probably had lower wages so his employer could pay the insurance/tax that funds unemployment benefits. That said, at least some places do require you to look for work while on unemployment. Is that your point?
– GreenMatt
Jan 15 '13 at 22:18
add a comment |Â
StackExchange.ready(function ()
$("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function ()
var showEditor = function()
$("#show-editor-button").hide();
$("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
;
var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
if(useFancy == 'True')
var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');
$(this).loadPopup(
url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
loaded: function(popup)
var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');
pTitle.text(popupTitle);
pBody.html(popupBody);
pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
)
else
var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true)
showEditor();
);
);
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
22
down vote
I would have phrased it as something positive, because I assume that it was.
When I left Company X, I had enough savings for the opportunity of a lifetime.
And then briefly portray the best parts in a good light.
I take inspiration from Tim Ferris, the author of "The 4 Hour Workweek", who briefly mentions just such circumstances.
edited Jul 13 '12 at 10:59
Spoike
1,9411520
answered Jul 12 '12 at 20:04
Letharion
95011021
2
+1 "Portray the best parts in a good light". People tend to forget the "productive" activities they did during their down time which is really a plus, e.g. in OP's case working on open source programming projects.
– Spoike
Jul 13 '12 at 10:43
@Spoike, out of curiosity, what's with the link going through so.com before going to amazon? :)
– Letharion
Jul 13 '12 at 12:12
It seems stackexchange sites converts links that go to Amazon... probably so that they can get some referrer bonus from them or something.
– Spoike
Jul 13 '12 at 12:55
Ah, so it wasn't intentional. Cool, I'll start posting a lot of amazon links to support SO then ;)
– Letharion
Jul 13 '12 at 14:19
add a comment |Â
up vote
22
down vote
I would have phrased it as something positive, because I assume that it was.
When I left Company X, I had enough savings for the opportunity of a lifetime.
And then briefly portray the best parts in a good light.
I take inspiration from Tim Ferris, the author of "The 4 Hour Workweek", who briefly mentions just such circumstances.
edited Jul 13 '12 at 10:59
Spoike
1,9411520
answered Jul 12 '12 at 20:04
Letharion
95011021
2
+1 "Portray the best parts in a good light". People tend to forget the "productive" activities they did during their down time which is really a plus, e.g. in OP's case working on open source programming projects.
– Spoike
Jul 13 '12 at 10:43
@Spoike, out of curiosity, what's with the link going through so.com before going to amazon? :)
– Letharion
Jul 13 '12 at 12:12
It seems stackexchange sites converts links that go to Amazon... probably so that they can get some referrer bonus from them or something.
– Spoike
Jul 13 '12 at 12:55
Ah, so it wasn't intentional. Cool, I'll start posting a lot of amazon links to support SO then ;)
– Letharion
Jul 13 '12 at 14:19
add a comment |Â
up vote
22
down vote
up vote
22
down vote
I would have phrased it as something positive, because I assume that it was.
When I left Company X, I had enough savings for the opportunity of a lifetime.
And then briefly portray the best parts in a good light.
I take inspiration from Tim Ferris, the author of "The 4 Hour Workweek", who briefly mentions just such circumstances.
edited Jul 13 '12 at 10:59
Spoike
1,9411520
answered Jul 12 '12 at 20:04
Letharion
95011021
I would have phrased it as something positive, because I assume that it was.
When I left Company X, I had enough savings for the opportunity of a lifetime.
And then briefly portray the best parts in a good light.
I take inspiration from Tim Ferris, the author of "The 4 Hour Workweek", who briefly mentions just such circumstances.
edited Jul 13 '12 at 10:59
Spoike
1,9411520
answered Jul 12 '12 at 20:04
Letharion
95011021
edited Jul 13 '12 at 10:59
Spoike
1,9411520
edited Jul 13 '12 at 10:59
Spoike
1,9411520
edited Jul 13 '12 at 10:59
Spoike
1,9411520
1,9411520
answered Jul 12 '12 at 20:04
Letharion
95011021
answered Jul 12 '12 at 20:04
Letharion
95011021
answered Jul 12 '12 at 20:04
Letharion
95011021
95011021
2
+1 "Portray the best parts in a good light". People tend to forget the "productive" activities they did during their down time which is really a plus, e.g. in OP's case working on open source programming projects.
– Spoike
Jul 13 '12 at 10:43
@Spoike, out of curiosity, what's with the link going through so.com before going to amazon? :)
– Letharion
Jul 13 '12 at 12:12
It seems stackexchange sites converts links that go to Amazon... probably so that they can get some referrer bonus from them or something.
– Spoike
Jul 13 '12 at 12:55
Ah, so it wasn't intentional. Cool, I'll start posting a lot of amazon links to support SO then ;)
– Letharion
Jul 13 '12 at 14:19
add a comment |Â
2
+1 "Portray the best parts in a good light". People tend to forget the "productive" activities they did during their down time which is really a plus, e.g. in OP's case working on open source programming projects.
– Spoike
Jul 13 '12 at 10:43
@Spoike, out of curiosity, what's with the link going through so.com before going to amazon? :)
– Letharion
Jul 13 '12 at 12:12
It seems stackexchange sites converts links that go to Amazon... probably so that they can get some referrer bonus from them or something.
– Spoike
Jul 13 '12 at 12:55
Ah, so it wasn't intentional. Cool, I'll start posting a lot of amazon links to support SO then ;)
– Letharion
Jul 13 '12 at 14:19
2
2
+1 "Portray the best parts in a good light". People tend to forget the "productive" activities they did during their down time which is really a plus, e.g. in OP's case working on open source programming projects.
– Spoike
Jul 13 '12 at 10:43
+1 "Portray the best parts in a good light". People tend to forget the "productive" activities they did during their down time which is really a plus, e.g. in OP's case working on open source programming projects.
– Spoike
Jul 13 '12 at 10:43
@Spoike, out of curiosity, what's with the link going through so.com before going to amazon? :)
– Letharion
Jul 13 '12 at 12:12
@Spoike, out of curiosity, what's with the link going through so.com before going to amazon? :)
– Letharion
Jul 13 '12 at 12:12
It seems stackexchange sites converts links that go to Amazon... probably so that they can get some referrer bonus from them or something.
– Spoike
Jul 13 '12 at 12:55
It seems stackexchange sites converts links that go to Amazon... probably so that they can get some referrer bonus from them or something.
– Spoike
Jul 13 '12 at 12:55
Ah, so it wasn't intentional. Cool, I'll start posting a lot of amazon links to support SO then ;)
– Letharion
Jul 13 '12 at 14:19
Ah, so it wasn't intentional. Cool, I'll start posting a lot of amazon links to support SO then ;)
– Letharion
Jul 13 '12 at 14:19
add a comment |Â
up vote
16
down vote
Really, what's wrong with an honest answer?
You saved and spent sensibly. Spending a year out of the workplace while traveling on your own money and working on personal projects does not make you a 'bum'!
If a company won't hire you because you gave an honest answer to a personal question that's non-relevant to their requirements, then do you really want to work there in the first place?
answered Jul 12 '12 at 20:54
Jim In Texas
3,9851222
1
then do you really want to work there in the first place? - yes they are a great employer...
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 13 '12 at 12:56
3
@Chad: "Great employer" is such a loose term. Even if an employer are highly regarded by outsiders does not necessarily equate to great workplace or company culture that one would like to participate in. Potential employers who don't respond well to honest answers should be seen as a huge red flag, as in borderline exploitative, which should be considered if you're looking.
– Spoike
Jul 16 '12 at 10:53
@Spoike - My point was that just because you have to get past the troll on the bridge sometimes it is worth it to get to the other side.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 16 '12 at 12:51
1
@Chad - I understand that point. My point is that I have cynically low tolerance for trolls. If there are other bridges in the vicinity that are devoid of trolls then I'd rather burn the bridge down with the troll under it earlier than to get eaten up by it. How's that for analogy? :-D My rationale is that recruiters and HR drones have a responsibility to act appropriately, ethically and professionally on the behalf of their customer (who is the employer). This outlook may fail if all bridges have trolls on them, but in my experience that situation is a quite rare.
– Spoike
Jul 16 '12 at 14:02
1
If the OP wasn't hired because of his honest answer, it is most probable that the real reason he wasn't hired was just that the interviewer didn't like him personally and seized his year as a 'bum' as an excuse. It is impossible for me to get my head around a company that would say "Ron did well on his interview and has the qualifications we're looking for, but darn it, he was a bum for a year so we have to pass". And someone thinks that is a 'great company'!
– Jim In Texas
Jul 17 '12 at 1:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
16
down vote
Really, what's wrong with an honest answer?
You saved and spent sensibly. Spending a year out of the workplace while traveling on your own money and working on personal projects does not make you a 'bum'!
If a company won't hire you because you gave an honest answer to a personal question that's non-relevant to their requirements, then do you really want to work there in the first place?
answered Jul 12 '12 at 20:54
Jim In Texas
3,9851222
1
then do you really want to work there in the first place? - yes they are a great employer...
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 13 '12 at 12:56
3
@Chad: "Great employer" is such a loose term. Even if an employer are highly regarded by outsiders does not necessarily equate to great workplace or company culture that one would like to participate in. Potential employers who don't respond well to honest answers should be seen as a huge red flag, as in borderline exploitative, which should be considered if you're looking.
– Spoike
Jul 16 '12 at 10:53
@Spoike - My point was that just because you have to get past the troll on the bridge sometimes it is worth it to get to the other side.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 16 '12 at 12:51
1
@Chad - I understand that point. My point is that I have cynically low tolerance for trolls. If there are other bridges in the vicinity that are devoid of trolls then I'd rather burn the bridge down with the troll under it earlier than to get eaten up by it. How's that for analogy? :-D My rationale is that recruiters and HR drones have a responsibility to act appropriately, ethically and professionally on the behalf of their customer (who is the employer). This outlook may fail if all bridges have trolls on them, but in my experience that situation is a quite rare.
– Spoike
Jul 16 '12 at 14:02
1
If the OP wasn't hired because of his honest answer, it is most probable that the real reason he wasn't hired was just that the interviewer didn't like him personally and seized his year as a 'bum' as an excuse. It is impossible for me to get my head around a company that would say "Ron did well on his interview and has the qualifications we're looking for, but darn it, he was a bum for a year so we have to pass". And someone thinks that is a 'great company'!
– Jim In Texas
Jul 17 '12 at 1:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
16
down vote
up vote
16
down vote
Really, what's wrong with an honest answer?
You saved and spent sensibly. Spending a year out of the workplace while traveling on your own money and working on personal projects does not make you a 'bum'!
If a company won't hire you because you gave an honest answer to a personal question that's non-relevant to their requirements, then do you really want to work there in the first place?
answered Jul 12 '12 at 20:54
Jim In Texas
3,9851222
Really, what's wrong with an honest answer?
You saved and spent sensibly. Spending a year out of the workplace while traveling on your own money and working on personal projects does not make you a 'bum'!
If a company won't hire you because you gave an honest answer to a personal question that's non-relevant to their requirements, then do you really want to work there in the first place?
answered Jul 12 '12 at 20:54
Jim In Texas
3,9851222
answered Jul 12 '12 at 20:54
Jim In Texas
3,9851222
answered Jul 12 '12 at 20:54
Jim In Texas
3,9851222
answered Jul 12 '12 at 20:54
Jim In Texas
3,9851222
3,9851222
1
then do you really want to work there in the first place? - yes they are a great employer...
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 13 '12 at 12:56
3
@Chad: "Great employer" is such a loose term. Even if an employer are highly regarded by outsiders does not necessarily equate to great workplace or company culture that one would like to participate in. Potential employers who don't respond well to honest answers should be seen as a huge red flag, as in borderline exploitative, which should be considered if you're looking.
– Spoike
Jul 16 '12 at 10:53
@Spoike - My point was that just because you have to get past the troll on the bridge sometimes it is worth it to get to the other side.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 16 '12 at 12:51
1
@Chad - I understand that point. My point is that I have cynically low tolerance for trolls. If there are other bridges in the vicinity that are devoid of trolls then I'd rather burn the bridge down with the troll under it earlier than to get eaten up by it. How's that for analogy? :-D My rationale is that recruiters and HR drones have a responsibility to act appropriately, ethically and professionally on the behalf of their customer (who is the employer). This outlook may fail if all bridges have trolls on them, but in my experience that situation is a quite rare.
– Spoike
Jul 16 '12 at 14:02
1
If the OP wasn't hired because of his honest answer, it is most probable that the real reason he wasn't hired was just that the interviewer didn't like him personally and seized his year as a 'bum' as an excuse. It is impossible for me to get my head around a company that would say "Ron did well on his interview and has the qualifications we're looking for, but darn it, he was a bum for a year so we have to pass". And someone thinks that is a 'great company'!
– Jim In Texas
Jul 17 '12 at 1:26
add a comment |Â
1
then do you really want to work there in the first place? - yes they are a great employer...
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 13 '12 at 12:56
3
@Chad: "Great employer" is such a loose term. Even if an employer are highly regarded by outsiders does not necessarily equate to great workplace or company culture that one would like to participate in. Potential employers who don't respond well to honest answers should be seen as a huge red flag, as in borderline exploitative, which should be considered if you're looking.
– Spoike
Jul 16 '12 at 10:53
@Spoike - My point was that just because you have to get past the troll on the bridge sometimes it is worth it to get to the other side.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 16 '12 at 12:51
1
@Chad - I understand that point. My point is that I have cynically low tolerance for trolls. If there are other bridges in the vicinity that are devoid of trolls then I'd rather burn the bridge down with the troll under it earlier than to get eaten up by it. How's that for analogy? :-D My rationale is that recruiters and HR drones have a responsibility to act appropriately, ethically and professionally on the behalf of their customer (who is the employer). This outlook may fail if all bridges have trolls on them, but in my experience that situation is a quite rare.
– Spoike
Jul 16 '12 at 14:02
1
If the OP wasn't hired because of his honest answer, it is most probable that the real reason he wasn't hired was just that the interviewer didn't like him personally and seized his year as a 'bum' as an excuse. It is impossible for me to get my head around a company that would say "Ron did well on his interview and has the qualifications we're looking for, but darn it, he was a bum for a year so we have to pass". And someone thinks that is a 'great company'!
– Jim In Texas
Jul 17 '12 at 1:26
1
1
then do you really want to work there in the first place? - yes they are a great employer...
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 13 '12 at 12:56
then do you really want to work there in the first place? - yes they are a great employer...
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 13 '12 at 12:56
3
3
@Chad: "Great employer" is such a loose term. Even if an employer are highly regarded by outsiders does not necessarily equate to great workplace or company culture that one would like to participate in. Potential employers who don't respond well to honest answers should be seen as a huge red flag, as in borderline exploitative, which should be considered if you're looking.
– Spoike
Jul 16 '12 at 10:53
@Chad: "Great employer" is such a loose term. Even if an employer are highly regarded by outsiders does not necessarily equate to great workplace or company culture that one would like to participate in. Potential employers who don't respond well to honest answers should be seen as a huge red flag, as in borderline exploitative, which should be considered if you're looking.
– Spoike
Jul 16 '12 at 10:53
@Spoike - My point was that just because you have to get past the troll on the bridge sometimes it is worth it to get to the other side.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 16 '12 at 12:51
@Spoike - My point was that just because you have to get past the troll on the bridge sometimes it is worth it to get to the other side.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 16 '12 at 12:51
1
1
@Chad - I understand that point. My point is that I have cynically low tolerance for trolls. If there are other bridges in the vicinity that are devoid of trolls then I'd rather burn the bridge down with the troll under it earlier than to get eaten up by it. How's that for analogy? :-D My rationale is that recruiters and HR drones have a responsibility to act appropriately, ethically and professionally on the behalf of their customer (who is the employer). This outlook may fail if all bridges have trolls on them, but in my experience that situation is a quite rare.
– Spoike
Jul 16 '12 at 14:02
@Chad - I understand that point. My point is that I have cynically low tolerance for trolls. If there are other bridges in the vicinity that are devoid of trolls then I'd rather burn the bridge down with the troll under it earlier than to get eaten up by it. How's that for analogy? :-D My rationale is that recruiters and HR drones have a responsibility to act appropriately, ethically and professionally on the behalf of their customer (who is the employer). This outlook may fail if all bridges have trolls on them, but in my experience that situation is a quite rare.
– Spoike
Jul 16 '12 at 14:02
1
1
If the OP wasn't hired because of his honest answer, it is most probable that the real reason he wasn't hired was just that the interviewer didn't like him personally and seized his year as a 'bum' as an excuse. It is impossible for me to get my head around a company that would say "Ron did well on his interview and has the qualifications we're looking for, but darn it, he was a bum for a year so we have to pass". And someone thinks that is a 'great company'!
– Jim In Texas
Jul 17 '12 at 1:26
If the OP wasn't hired because of his honest answer, it is most probable that the real reason he wasn't hired was just that the interviewer didn't like him personally and seized his year as a 'bum' as an excuse. It is impossible for me to get my head around a company that would say "Ron did well on his interview and has the qualifications we're looking for, but darn it, he was a bum for a year so we have to pass". And someone thinks that is a 'great company'!
– Jim In Texas
Jul 17 '12 at 1:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
I subscribe to Steve Jobs' philosophy about innovation: it comes from having a lot of experiences and then being able to "connect the dots." Given that you have built up a number of experiences in the past year, I would view your experiences as an asset if I were on the other side of the table. I would expect that you'd a more nimble collaborator, and somebody I'd want to work with. I would also expect that your batteries be recharged, so I wouldn't have to worry about burn-out in the near future. Bottom-line: Give an honest answer!
answered Jul 13 '12 at 16:47
jdb1a1
1,77911419
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
I subscribe to Steve Jobs' philosophy about innovation: it comes from having a lot of experiences and then being able to "connect the dots." Given that you have built up a number of experiences in the past year, I would view your experiences as an asset if I were on the other side of the table. I would expect that you'd a more nimble collaborator, and somebody I'd want to work with. I would also expect that your batteries be recharged, so I wouldn't have to worry about burn-out in the near future. Bottom-line: Give an honest answer!
answered Jul 13 '12 at 16:47
jdb1a1
1,77911419
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
I subscribe to Steve Jobs' philosophy about innovation: it comes from having a lot of experiences and then being able to "connect the dots." Given that you have built up a number of experiences in the past year, I would view your experiences as an asset if I were on the other side of the table. I would expect that you'd a more nimble collaborator, and somebody I'd want to work with. I would also expect that your batteries be recharged, so I wouldn't have to worry about burn-out in the near future. Bottom-line: Give an honest answer!
answered Jul 13 '12 at 16:47
jdb1a1
1,77911419
I subscribe to Steve Jobs' philosophy about innovation: it comes from having a lot of experiences and then being able to "connect the dots." Given that you have built up a number of experiences in the past year, I would view your experiences as an asset if I were on the other side of the table. I would expect that you'd a more nimble collaborator, and somebody I'd want to work with. I would also expect that your batteries be recharged, so I wouldn't have to worry about burn-out in the near future. Bottom-line: Give an honest answer!
answered Jul 13 '12 at 16:47
jdb1a1
1,77911419
answered Jul 13 '12 at 16:47
jdb1a1
1,77911419
answered Jul 13 '12 at 16:47
jdb1a1
1,77911419
answered Jul 13 '12 at 16:47
jdb1a1
1,77911419
1,77911419
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Sounds like you are someone who worked hard enough to save a year's wages. However, if you collected unemployement when you could be working, that's a tough sell. Demonstrate what you've learned from the open source project.
Hopefully, you've learned some strategies to not get burned-out in your next job or maybe focus on project work with limited time-frames.
Why is it a tough sell if the OP collected unemployment? To me, that's just smart, since the unemployment would allow him to extend his savings and he probably had lower wages so his employer could pay the insurance/tax that funds unemployment benefits. That said, at least some places do require you to look for work while on unemployment. Is that your point?
– GreenMatt
Jan 15 '13 at 22:18
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Sounds like you are someone who worked hard enough to save a year's wages. However, if you collected unemployement when you could be working, that's a tough sell. Demonstrate what you've learned from the open source project.
Hopefully, you've learned some strategies to not get burned-out in your next job or maybe focus on project work with limited time-frames.
Why is it a tough sell if the OP collected unemployment? To me, that's just smart, since the unemployment would allow him to extend his savings and he probably had lower wages so his employer could pay the insurance/tax that funds unemployment benefits. That said, at least some places do require you to look for work while on unemployment. Is that your point?
– GreenMatt
Jan 15 '13 at 22:18
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Sounds like you are someone who worked hard enough to save a year's wages. However, if you collected unemployement when you could be working, that's a tough sell. Demonstrate what you've learned from the open source project.
Hopefully, you've learned some strategies to not get burned-out in your next job or maybe focus on project work with limited time-frames.
Sounds like you are someone who worked hard enough to save a year's wages. However, if you collected unemployement when you could be working, that's a tough sell. Demonstrate what you've learned from the open source project.
Hopefully, you've learned some strategies to not get burned-out in your next job or maybe focus on project work with limited time-frames.
answered Jul 15 '12 at 1:01
user8365
Why is it a tough sell if the OP collected unemployment? To me, that's just smart, since the unemployment would allow him to extend his savings and he probably had lower wages so his employer could pay the insurance/tax that funds unemployment benefits. That said, at least some places do require you to look for work while on unemployment. Is that your point?
– GreenMatt
Jan 15 '13 at 22:18
add a comment |Â
Why is it a tough sell if the OP collected unemployment? To me, that's just smart, since the unemployment would allow him to extend his savings and he probably had lower wages so his employer could pay the insurance/tax that funds unemployment benefits. That said, at least some places do require you to look for work while on unemployment. Is that your point?
– GreenMatt
Jan 15 '13 at 22:18
Why is it a tough sell if the OP collected unemployment? To me, that's just smart, since the unemployment would allow him to extend his savings and he probably had lower wages so his employer could pay the insurance/tax that funds unemployment benefits. That said, at least some places do require you to look for work while on unemployment. Is that your point?
– GreenMatt
Jan 15 '13 at 22:18
Why is it a tough sell if the OP collected unemployment? To me, that's just smart, since the unemployment would allow him to extend his savings and he probably had lower wages so his employer could pay the insurance/tax that funds unemployment benefits. That said, at least some places do require you to look for work while on unemployment. Is that your point?
– GreenMatt
Jan 15 '13 at 22:18
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2466%2fhow-do-i-explain-not-actively-looking-for-a-job-until-a-year-after-i-was-laid-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
it is not wrong to say that because of market conditions company downsized.
– EL Yusubov
Jul 13 '12 at 0:52
1
I can understand a few months but I personally feel that it is a tad irresponsible to use savings to slack for a whole year. With that being said I wouldn't hold it against you if I were hiring for a position and I felt you were qualified.
– maple_shaft
Jul 13 '12 at 12:13