Motivate people in team in a non work environment [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
-2
down vote

favorite












I have a small group working on a project together. I'm a team leader, but not the boss. The project is not for money, it's our thesis. We have around 6 months to finish this project.



This is the 2nd month, and the progress is not good. Each of us has our own responsibility, like design, coding, etc. I usually work 6-8 hours a day, so the progress of my responsibility is good, but progress made by the others is not so good.



My goal is to motivate my team members to work like me, or at least to work harder without micro managing them. This means I don't want to tell them what to do on daily basis, to the smallest work detail. I prefer agile development, where they manage themselves.



What is the best way to do this?



How to talk to them so they wont get angry (because we are friends)?



Perhaps my number one problem is because they are my friends, and I don't want to hurt their feelings. I want to believe them, but the schedule is getting tight and the progress is bad.



Thanks for your time.







share|improve this question














closed as too broad by Jim G., gnat, Garrison Neely, IDrinkandIKnowThings, Joe Strazzere Oct 15 '14 at 19:40


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • To clarify: you're working 6-8 hours a day with no pay and no manager for 6 months? And you expect others to do this too?
    – raptortech97
    Oct 9 '14 at 1:18










  • @raptortech97 yes, its for our thesis. I will update my question. Thanks
    – Blaze Tama
    Oct 9 '14 at 1:19











  • Why is the progress not good? What's holding things up? Is the situation remediable? If so, what actions must be taken to remedy the situation? Would cracking the whip make any difference? Would offering your support make any difference? I can't begin to count those instances where team work meant I did all the work when I was at NYU and CCNY. Fortunately, Columbia was a much better situation.
    – Vietnhi Phuvan
    Oct 9 '14 at 2:41






  • 2




    possible duplicate of How do I motivate my colleagues?
    – IDrinkandIKnowThings
    Oct 9 '14 at 15:35










  • " where they manage themselves" that's the issue.
    – lambdapool
    May 10 '16 at 16:03
















up vote
-2
down vote

favorite












I have a small group working on a project together. I'm a team leader, but not the boss. The project is not for money, it's our thesis. We have around 6 months to finish this project.



This is the 2nd month, and the progress is not good. Each of us has our own responsibility, like design, coding, etc. I usually work 6-8 hours a day, so the progress of my responsibility is good, but progress made by the others is not so good.



My goal is to motivate my team members to work like me, or at least to work harder without micro managing them. This means I don't want to tell them what to do on daily basis, to the smallest work detail. I prefer agile development, where they manage themselves.



What is the best way to do this?



How to talk to them so they wont get angry (because we are friends)?



Perhaps my number one problem is because they are my friends, and I don't want to hurt their feelings. I want to believe them, but the schedule is getting tight and the progress is bad.



Thanks for your time.







share|improve this question














closed as too broad by Jim G., gnat, Garrison Neely, IDrinkandIKnowThings, Joe Strazzere Oct 15 '14 at 19:40


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • To clarify: you're working 6-8 hours a day with no pay and no manager for 6 months? And you expect others to do this too?
    – raptortech97
    Oct 9 '14 at 1:18










  • @raptortech97 yes, its for our thesis. I will update my question. Thanks
    – Blaze Tama
    Oct 9 '14 at 1:19











  • Why is the progress not good? What's holding things up? Is the situation remediable? If so, what actions must be taken to remedy the situation? Would cracking the whip make any difference? Would offering your support make any difference? I can't begin to count those instances where team work meant I did all the work when I was at NYU and CCNY. Fortunately, Columbia was a much better situation.
    – Vietnhi Phuvan
    Oct 9 '14 at 2:41






  • 2




    possible duplicate of How do I motivate my colleagues?
    – IDrinkandIKnowThings
    Oct 9 '14 at 15:35










  • " where they manage themselves" that's the issue.
    – lambdapool
    May 10 '16 at 16:03












up vote
-2
down vote

favorite









up vote
-2
down vote

favorite











I have a small group working on a project together. I'm a team leader, but not the boss. The project is not for money, it's our thesis. We have around 6 months to finish this project.



This is the 2nd month, and the progress is not good. Each of us has our own responsibility, like design, coding, etc. I usually work 6-8 hours a day, so the progress of my responsibility is good, but progress made by the others is not so good.



My goal is to motivate my team members to work like me, or at least to work harder without micro managing them. This means I don't want to tell them what to do on daily basis, to the smallest work detail. I prefer agile development, where they manage themselves.



What is the best way to do this?



How to talk to them so they wont get angry (because we are friends)?



Perhaps my number one problem is because they are my friends, and I don't want to hurt their feelings. I want to believe them, but the schedule is getting tight and the progress is bad.



Thanks for your time.







share|improve this question














I have a small group working on a project together. I'm a team leader, but not the boss. The project is not for money, it's our thesis. We have around 6 months to finish this project.



This is the 2nd month, and the progress is not good. Each of us has our own responsibility, like design, coding, etc. I usually work 6-8 hours a day, so the progress of my responsibility is good, but progress made by the others is not so good.



My goal is to motivate my team members to work like me, or at least to work harder without micro managing them. This means I don't want to tell them what to do on daily basis, to the smallest work detail. I prefer agile development, where they manage themselves.



What is the best way to do this?



How to talk to them so they wont get angry (because we are friends)?



Perhaps my number one problem is because they are my friends, and I don't want to hurt their feelings. I want to believe them, but the schedule is getting tight and the progress is bad.



Thanks for your time.









share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Oct 14 '14 at 3:11









Pepone

1,508815




1,508815










asked Oct 9 '14 at 0:38









Blaze Tama

994




994




closed as too broad by Jim G., gnat, Garrison Neely, IDrinkandIKnowThings, Joe Strazzere Oct 15 '14 at 19:40


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






closed as too broad by Jim G., gnat, Garrison Neely, IDrinkandIKnowThings, Joe Strazzere Oct 15 '14 at 19:40


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • To clarify: you're working 6-8 hours a day with no pay and no manager for 6 months? And you expect others to do this too?
    – raptortech97
    Oct 9 '14 at 1:18










  • @raptortech97 yes, its for our thesis. I will update my question. Thanks
    – Blaze Tama
    Oct 9 '14 at 1:19











  • Why is the progress not good? What's holding things up? Is the situation remediable? If so, what actions must be taken to remedy the situation? Would cracking the whip make any difference? Would offering your support make any difference? I can't begin to count those instances where team work meant I did all the work when I was at NYU and CCNY. Fortunately, Columbia was a much better situation.
    – Vietnhi Phuvan
    Oct 9 '14 at 2:41






  • 2




    possible duplicate of How do I motivate my colleagues?
    – IDrinkandIKnowThings
    Oct 9 '14 at 15:35










  • " where they manage themselves" that's the issue.
    – lambdapool
    May 10 '16 at 16:03
















  • To clarify: you're working 6-8 hours a day with no pay and no manager for 6 months? And you expect others to do this too?
    – raptortech97
    Oct 9 '14 at 1:18










  • @raptortech97 yes, its for our thesis. I will update my question. Thanks
    – Blaze Tama
    Oct 9 '14 at 1:19











  • Why is the progress not good? What's holding things up? Is the situation remediable? If so, what actions must be taken to remedy the situation? Would cracking the whip make any difference? Would offering your support make any difference? I can't begin to count those instances where team work meant I did all the work when I was at NYU and CCNY. Fortunately, Columbia was a much better situation.
    – Vietnhi Phuvan
    Oct 9 '14 at 2:41






  • 2




    possible duplicate of How do I motivate my colleagues?
    – IDrinkandIKnowThings
    Oct 9 '14 at 15:35










  • " where they manage themselves" that's the issue.
    – lambdapool
    May 10 '16 at 16:03















To clarify: you're working 6-8 hours a day with no pay and no manager for 6 months? And you expect others to do this too?
– raptortech97
Oct 9 '14 at 1:18




To clarify: you're working 6-8 hours a day with no pay and no manager for 6 months? And you expect others to do this too?
– raptortech97
Oct 9 '14 at 1:18












@raptortech97 yes, its for our thesis. I will update my question. Thanks
– Blaze Tama
Oct 9 '14 at 1:19





@raptortech97 yes, its for our thesis. I will update my question. Thanks
– Blaze Tama
Oct 9 '14 at 1:19













Why is the progress not good? What's holding things up? Is the situation remediable? If so, what actions must be taken to remedy the situation? Would cracking the whip make any difference? Would offering your support make any difference? I can't begin to count those instances where team work meant I did all the work when I was at NYU and CCNY. Fortunately, Columbia was a much better situation.
– Vietnhi Phuvan
Oct 9 '14 at 2:41




Why is the progress not good? What's holding things up? Is the situation remediable? If so, what actions must be taken to remedy the situation? Would cracking the whip make any difference? Would offering your support make any difference? I can't begin to count those instances where team work meant I did all the work when I was at NYU and CCNY. Fortunately, Columbia was a much better situation.
– Vietnhi Phuvan
Oct 9 '14 at 2:41




2




2




possible duplicate of How do I motivate my colleagues?
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Oct 9 '14 at 15:35




possible duplicate of How do I motivate my colleagues?
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Oct 9 '14 at 15:35












" where they manage themselves" that's the issue.
– lambdapool
May 10 '16 at 16:03




" where they manage themselves" that's the issue.
– lambdapool
May 10 '16 at 16:03










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote



accepted










"Agile" does not mean everybody manages himself. It means that the team manages the team. You need meetings where the team decides what needs to be done, you need time for the team to do it and you need meetings where the results will be presented.



Make sure people estimate their own work and present this estimation. This way, they will feel honour-bound to actually get it done. A manager can tell you he needs it by friday. That's his problem. But if you said it's done by friday, it's your problem. That's a huge difference in motivation. Don't underestimate the will to not look incompetent in front of the group, even for lazy students.



Managing is not easy, but from my experience, every group needs management. Because management will solve problems. As soon as people realize that your actions solve problems, you will have no problems managing the group, whether you are officially appointed or not. If your actions create problems (stereotypical would be adding work to create a status update for the manager. This solves no problems, except the managers problems) then you will not be accepted, or only accepted because external forces say so.



Summary: you need management. Agile might be just right. But make it Agile. Agile is a method like any other, it's not chaos or "everybody does what he likes". Follow the methology and it might work great. Or use another. But you need management. And you need to show your group the consequences of their actions. In Agile for example, you'd have a burndown chart that would clearly read "FAIL" right now. That's something to work with.






share|improve this answer




















  • +1 for the first two sentences. I really wish more people understood this.
    – Jenny D
    Oct 9 '14 at 6:30






  • 2




    And in many agile processes, daily progress meetings are part of the process. That is how you know who is stuck on what and what progress everyone has made.
    – HLGEM
    Oct 9 '14 at 15:15










  • Thanks a lot, i will try to manage them as soft as possible
    – Blaze Tama
    Oct 16 '14 at 5:51

















up vote
1
down vote













It sounds that you are a talented person, with a broad view of the mission, and you don't only care for your own job but also for the job of other people. This sounds like you are made of a good "management material".You should consider the possibility that they lack the tools, knowledge, and even talent, to preform on the level you expect them. So, try to show them, without condescending them, new tools, and resources that they may lack to fulfill their job. Keep in mind not to patronize them,and not to do their job instead.






share|improve this answer




















  • "Keep in mind not to patronize them,and not to do their job instead." Thanks.
    – Blaze Tama
    Oct 16 '14 at 5:52

















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
5
down vote



accepted










"Agile" does not mean everybody manages himself. It means that the team manages the team. You need meetings where the team decides what needs to be done, you need time for the team to do it and you need meetings where the results will be presented.



Make sure people estimate their own work and present this estimation. This way, they will feel honour-bound to actually get it done. A manager can tell you he needs it by friday. That's his problem. But if you said it's done by friday, it's your problem. That's a huge difference in motivation. Don't underestimate the will to not look incompetent in front of the group, even for lazy students.



Managing is not easy, but from my experience, every group needs management. Because management will solve problems. As soon as people realize that your actions solve problems, you will have no problems managing the group, whether you are officially appointed or not. If your actions create problems (stereotypical would be adding work to create a status update for the manager. This solves no problems, except the managers problems) then you will not be accepted, or only accepted because external forces say so.



Summary: you need management. Agile might be just right. But make it Agile. Agile is a method like any other, it's not chaos or "everybody does what he likes". Follow the methology and it might work great. Or use another. But you need management. And you need to show your group the consequences of their actions. In Agile for example, you'd have a burndown chart that would clearly read "FAIL" right now. That's something to work with.






share|improve this answer




















  • +1 for the first two sentences. I really wish more people understood this.
    – Jenny D
    Oct 9 '14 at 6:30






  • 2




    And in many agile processes, daily progress meetings are part of the process. That is how you know who is stuck on what and what progress everyone has made.
    – HLGEM
    Oct 9 '14 at 15:15










  • Thanks a lot, i will try to manage them as soft as possible
    – Blaze Tama
    Oct 16 '14 at 5:51














up vote
5
down vote



accepted










"Agile" does not mean everybody manages himself. It means that the team manages the team. You need meetings where the team decides what needs to be done, you need time for the team to do it and you need meetings where the results will be presented.



Make sure people estimate their own work and present this estimation. This way, they will feel honour-bound to actually get it done. A manager can tell you he needs it by friday. That's his problem. But if you said it's done by friday, it's your problem. That's a huge difference in motivation. Don't underestimate the will to not look incompetent in front of the group, even for lazy students.



Managing is not easy, but from my experience, every group needs management. Because management will solve problems. As soon as people realize that your actions solve problems, you will have no problems managing the group, whether you are officially appointed or not. If your actions create problems (stereotypical would be adding work to create a status update for the manager. This solves no problems, except the managers problems) then you will not be accepted, or only accepted because external forces say so.



Summary: you need management. Agile might be just right. But make it Agile. Agile is a method like any other, it's not chaos or "everybody does what he likes". Follow the methology and it might work great. Or use another. But you need management. And you need to show your group the consequences of their actions. In Agile for example, you'd have a burndown chart that would clearly read "FAIL" right now. That's something to work with.






share|improve this answer




















  • +1 for the first two sentences. I really wish more people understood this.
    – Jenny D
    Oct 9 '14 at 6:30






  • 2




    And in many agile processes, daily progress meetings are part of the process. That is how you know who is stuck on what and what progress everyone has made.
    – HLGEM
    Oct 9 '14 at 15:15










  • Thanks a lot, i will try to manage them as soft as possible
    – Blaze Tama
    Oct 16 '14 at 5:51












up vote
5
down vote



accepted







up vote
5
down vote



accepted






"Agile" does not mean everybody manages himself. It means that the team manages the team. You need meetings where the team decides what needs to be done, you need time for the team to do it and you need meetings where the results will be presented.



Make sure people estimate their own work and present this estimation. This way, they will feel honour-bound to actually get it done. A manager can tell you he needs it by friday. That's his problem. But if you said it's done by friday, it's your problem. That's a huge difference in motivation. Don't underestimate the will to not look incompetent in front of the group, even for lazy students.



Managing is not easy, but from my experience, every group needs management. Because management will solve problems. As soon as people realize that your actions solve problems, you will have no problems managing the group, whether you are officially appointed or not. If your actions create problems (stereotypical would be adding work to create a status update for the manager. This solves no problems, except the managers problems) then you will not be accepted, or only accepted because external forces say so.



Summary: you need management. Agile might be just right. But make it Agile. Agile is a method like any other, it's not chaos or "everybody does what he likes". Follow the methology and it might work great. Or use another. But you need management. And you need to show your group the consequences of their actions. In Agile for example, you'd have a burndown chart that would clearly read "FAIL" right now. That's something to work with.






share|improve this answer












"Agile" does not mean everybody manages himself. It means that the team manages the team. You need meetings where the team decides what needs to be done, you need time for the team to do it and you need meetings where the results will be presented.



Make sure people estimate their own work and present this estimation. This way, they will feel honour-bound to actually get it done. A manager can tell you he needs it by friday. That's his problem. But if you said it's done by friday, it's your problem. That's a huge difference in motivation. Don't underestimate the will to not look incompetent in front of the group, even for lazy students.



Managing is not easy, but from my experience, every group needs management. Because management will solve problems. As soon as people realize that your actions solve problems, you will have no problems managing the group, whether you are officially appointed or not. If your actions create problems (stereotypical would be adding work to create a status update for the manager. This solves no problems, except the managers problems) then you will not be accepted, or only accepted because external forces say so.



Summary: you need management. Agile might be just right. But make it Agile. Agile is a method like any other, it's not chaos or "everybody does what he likes". Follow the methology and it might work great. Or use another. But you need management. And you need to show your group the consequences of their actions. In Agile for example, you'd have a burndown chart that would clearly read "FAIL" right now. That's something to work with.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Oct 9 '14 at 6:16









nvoigt

42.6k18105147




42.6k18105147











  • +1 for the first two sentences. I really wish more people understood this.
    – Jenny D
    Oct 9 '14 at 6:30






  • 2




    And in many agile processes, daily progress meetings are part of the process. That is how you know who is stuck on what and what progress everyone has made.
    – HLGEM
    Oct 9 '14 at 15:15










  • Thanks a lot, i will try to manage them as soft as possible
    – Blaze Tama
    Oct 16 '14 at 5:51
















  • +1 for the first two sentences. I really wish more people understood this.
    – Jenny D
    Oct 9 '14 at 6:30






  • 2




    And in many agile processes, daily progress meetings are part of the process. That is how you know who is stuck on what and what progress everyone has made.
    – HLGEM
    Oct 9 '14 at 15:15










  • Thanks a lot, i will try to manage them as soft as possible
    – Blaze Tama
    Oct 16 '14 at 5:51















+1 for the first two sentences. I really wish more people understood this.
– Jenny D
Oct 9 '14 at 6:30




+1 for the first two sentences. I really wish more people understood this.
– Jenny D
Oct 9 '14 at 6:30




2




2




And in many agile processes, daily progress meetings are part of the process. That is how you know who is stuck on what and what progress everyone has made.
– HLGEM
Oct 9 '14 at 15:15




And in many agile processes, daily progress meetings are part of the process. That is how you know who is stuck on what and what progress everyone has made.
– HLGEM
Oct 9 '14 at 15:15












Thanks a lot, i will try to manage them as soft as possible
– Blaze Tama
Oct 16 '14 at 5:51




Thanks a lot, i will try to manage them as soft as possible
– Blaze Tama
Oct 16 '14 at 5:51












up vote
1
down vote













It sounds that you are a talented person, with a broad view of the mission, and you don't only care for your own job but also for the job of other people. This sounds like you are made of a good "management material".You should consider the possibility that they lack the tools, knowledge, and even talent, to preform on the level you expect them. So, try to show them, without condescending them, new tools, and resources that they may lack to fulfill their job. Keep in mind not to patronize them,and not to do their job instead.






share|improve this answer




















  • "Keep in mind not to patronize them,and not to do their job instead." Thanks.
    – Blaze Tama
    Oct 16 '14 at 5:52














up vote
1
down vote













It sounds that you are a talented person, with a broad view of the mission, and you don't only care for your own job but also for the job of other people. This sounds like you are made of a good "management material".You should consider the possibility that they lack the tools, knowledge, and even talent, to preform on the level you expect them. So, try to show them, without condescending them, new tools, and resources that they may lack to fulfill their job. Keep in mind not to patronize them,and not to do their job instead.






share|improve this answer




















  • "Keep in mind not to patronize them,and not to do their job instead." Thanks.
    – Blaze Tama
    Oct 16 '14 at 5:52












up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









It sounds that you are a talented person, with a broad view of the mission, and you don't only care for your own job but also for the job of other people. This sounds like you are made of a good "management material".You should consider the possibility that they lack the tools, knowledge, and even talent, to preform on the level you expect them. So, try to show them, without condescending them, new tools, and resources that they may lack to fulfill their job. Keep in mind not to patronize them,and not to do their job instead.






share|improve this answer












It sounds that you are a talented person, with a broad view of the mission, and you don't only care for your own job but also for the job of other people. This sounds like you are made of a good "management material".You should consider the possibility that they lack the tools, knowledge, and even talent, to preform on the level you expect them. So, try to show them, without condescending them, new tools, and resources that they may lack to fulfill their job. Keep in mind not to patronize them,and not to do their job instead.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Oct 15 '14 at 18:11







user28759


















  • "Keep in mind not to patronize them,and not to do their job instead." Thanks.
    – Blaze Tama
    Oct 16 '14 at 5:52
















  • "Keep in mind not to patronize them,and not to do their job instead." Thanks.
    – Blaze Tama
    Oct 16 '14 at 5:52















"Keep in mind not to patronize them,and not to do their job instead." Thanks.
– Blaze Tama
Oct 16 '14 at 5:52




"Keep in mind not to patronize them,and not to do their job instead." Thanks.
– Blaze Tama
Oct 16 '14 at 5:52


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What does second last employer means? [closed]

List of Gilmore Girls characters

Confectionery