How to implement work-to-rule in software development [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
-3
down vote

favorite












I'm looking for ways how to implement work-to-rule to make software developer work as inefficient as it can be but still follow the permanent job contract rules.



The question is how to do strike but do not lose your job.







share|improve this question














closed as unclear what you're asking by Jan Doggen, Dawny33, Lilienthal♦, panoptical, gnat Nov 2 '15 at 15:34


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 3




    What is your goal by doing this? I mean what result are you trying to get from your employer?
    – Brandin
    Nov 2 '15 at 14:40






  • 1




    Try missing a few key deliverable deadlines. What's that? Software Development you say? Never mind - nobody would notice :) Disclaimer - long time software developer
    – Laconic Droid
    Nov 2 '15 at 14:43






  • 3




    Sounds like a typical X-Y problem. Voting to close as 'unclear what you're asking'
    – Jan Doggen
    Nov 2 '15 at 14:55










  • Asking questions on Stackexchange sites is a good start.
    – user8365
    Nov 2 '15 at 15:23






  • 1




    The whole point of work-to-rule is that a large number of participants (normally organised by a union) simultaneously go slow - because it's impractical for the employer to fire everyone and get replacements without incurring greater costs than simply acceeding to their demands. Industries which employ small numbers of high-value individuals, where reputation counts, have a very different dynamic. And doing it alone is painting a target on your head.
    – Julia Hayward
    Nov 2 '15 at 16:33
















up vote
-3
down vote

favorite












I'm looking for ways how to implement work-to-rule to make software developer work as inefficient as it can be but still follow the permanent job contract rules.



The question is how to do strike but do not lose your job.







share|improve this question














closed as unclear what you're asking by Jan Doggen, Dawny33, Lilienthal♦, panoptical, gnat Nov 2 '15 at 15:34


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 3




    What is your goal by doing this? I mean what result are you trying to get from your employer?
    – Brandin
    Nov 2 '15 at 14:40






  • 1




    Try missing a few key deliverable deadlines. What's that? Software Development you say? Never mind - nobody would notice :) Disclaimer - long time software developer
    – Laconic Droid
    Nov 2 '15 at 14:43






  • 3




    Sounds like a typical X-Y problem. Voting to close as 'unclear what you're asking'
    – Jan Doggen
    Nov 2 '15 at 14:55










  • Asking questions on Stackexchange sites is a good start.
    – user8365
    Nov 2 '15 at 15:23






  • 1




    The whole point of work-to-rule is that a large number of participants (normally organised by a union) simultaneously go slow - because it's impractical for the employer to fire everyone and get replacements without incurring greater costs than simply acceeding to their demands. Industries which employ small numbers of high-value individuals, where reputation counts, have a very different dynamic. And doing it alone is painting a target on your head.
    – Julia Hayward
    Nov 2 '15 at 16:33












up vote
-3
down vote

favorite









up vote
-3
down vote

favorite











I'm looking for ways how to implement work-to-rule to make software developer work as inefficient as it can be but still follow the permanent job contract rules.



The question is how to do strike but do not lose your job.







share|improve this question














I'm looking for ways how to implement work-to-rule to make software developer work as inefficient as it can be but still follow the permanent job contract rules.



The question is how to do strike but do not lose your job.









share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 2 '15 at 15:05









Joe Strazzere

223k104652918




223k104652918










asked Nov 2 '15 at 14:34









Marian Paździoch

9193813




9193813




closed as unclear what you're asking by Jan Doggen, Dawny33, Lilienthal♦, panoptical, gnat Nov 2 '15 at 15:34


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






closed as unclear what you're asking by Jan Doggen, Dawny33, Lilienthal♦, panoptical, gnat Nov 2 '15 at 15:34


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 3




    What is your goal by doing this? I mean what result are you trying to get from your employer?
    – Brandin
    Nov 2 '15 at 14:40






  • 1




    Try missing a few key deliverable deadlines. What's that? Software Development you say? Never mind - nobody would notice :) Disclaimer - long time software developer
    – Laconic Droid
    Nov 2 '15 at 14:43






  • 3




    Sounds like a typical X-Y problem. Voting to close as 'unclear what you're asking'
    – Jan Doggen
    Nov 2 '15 at 14:55










  • Asking questions on Stackexchange sites is a good start.
    – user8365
    Nov 2 '15 at 15:23






  • 1




    The whole point of work-to-rule is that a large number of participants (normally organised by a union) simultaneously go slow - because it's impractical for the employer to fire everyone and get replacements without incurring greater costs than simply acceeding to their demands. Industries which employ small numbers of high-value individuals, where reputation counts, have a very different dynamic. And doing it alone is painting a target on your head.
    – Julia Hayward
    Nov 2 '15 at 16:33












  • 3




    What is your goal by doing this? I mean what result are you trying to get from your employer?
    – Brandin
    Nov 2 '15 at 14:40






  • 1




    Try missing a few key deliverable deadlines. What's that? Software Development you say? Never mind - nobody would notice :) Disclaimer - long time software developer
    – Laconic Droid
    Nov 2 '15 at 14:43






  • 3




    Sounds like a typical X-Y problem. Voting to close as 'unclear what you're asking'
    – Jan Doggen
    Nov 2 '15 at 14:55










  • Asking questions on Stackexchange sites is a good start.
    – user8365
    Nov 2 '15 at 15:23






  • 1




    The whole point of work-to-rule is that a large number of participants (normally organised by a union) simultaneously go slow - because it's impractical for the employer to fire everyone and get replacements without incurring greater costs than simply acceeding to their demands. Industries which employ small numbers of high-value individuals, where reputation counts, have a very different dynamic. And doing it alone is painting a target on your head.
    – Julia Hayward
    Nov 2 '15 at 16:33







3




3




What is your goal by doing this? I mean what result are you trying to get from your employer?
– Brandin
Nov 2 '15 at 14:40




What is your goal by doing this? I mean what result are you trying to get from your employer?
– Brandin
Nov 2 '15 at 14:40




1




1




Try missing a few key deliverable deadlines. What's that? Software Development you say? Never mind - nobody would notice :) Disclaimer - long time software developer
– Laconic Droid
Nov 2 '15 at 14:43




Try missing a few key deliverable deadlines. What's that? Software Development you say? Never mind - nobody would notice :) Disclaimer - long time software developer
– Laconic Droid
Nov 2 '15 at 14:43




3




3




Sounds like a typical X-Y problem. Voting to close as 'unclear what you're asking'
– Jan Doggen
Nov 2 '15 at 14:55




Sounds like a typical X-Y problem. Voting to close as 'unclear what you're asking'
– Jan Doggen
Nov 2 '15 at 14:55












Asking questions on Stackexchange sites is a good start.
– user8365
Nov 2 '15 at 15:23




Asking questions on Stackexchange sites is a good start.
– user8365
Nov 2 '15 at 15:23




1




1




The whole point of work-to-rule is that a large number of participants (normally organised by a union) simultaneously go slow - because it's impractical for the employer to fire everyone and get replacements without incurring greater costs than simply acceeding to their demands. Industries which employ small numbers of high-value individuals, where reputation counts, have a very different dynamic. And doing it alone is painting a target on your head.
– Julia Hayward
Nov 2 '15 at 16:33




The whole point of work-to-rule is that a large number of participants (normally organised by a union) simultaneously go slow - because it's impractical for the employer to fire everyone and get replacements without incurring greater costs than simply acceeding to their demands. Industries which employ small numbers of high-value individuals, where reputation counts, have a very different dynamic. And doing it alone is painting a target on your head.
– Julia Hayward
Nov 2 '15 at 16:33










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote














I'm looking for ways how to implement work-to-rule to make software
developer work as inefficient as it can be but still follow the
permanent job contract rules.




  • If you are in a union, make sure you discuss this with your union rep and get union approval beforehand

  • Know and fully understand the specifics of your contract

  • Know and fully understand the specifics of work rules in your locale

  • Make sure everyone in your workgroup sticks together and follows the same plan

  • Be prepared in the event you are fired

  • Be prepared to fight actions against you in a court of law

  • Don't do anything at all that isn't required by your contract

  • Don't ever come in early or stay late if it isn't required by contract

  • Take all the breaks you are entitled to by contract, without exception

This is not something I would ever advise someone to do in my locale (the US).



Where I live you will almost certainly lose your non-union job, and you will very likely lose your professional reputation. Perhaps in your locale and your contract this won't be the case, or perhaps you don't care.






share|improve this answer






















  • "Where I live you will almost certainly lose your job" this is exactly what work-to-rule is NOT about. The question is how to do strike but do not lose your job.
    – Marian Paździoch
    Nov 2 '15 at 14:54






  • 5




    @MarianPaździoch In the US very few IT people are unionized; and without the backing a union gives would be promptly sacked and replaced for trying it.
    – Dan Neely
    Nov 2 '15 at 15:07

















up vote
0
down vote













At least in the US, you can be fired for a slowdown as easily as for a strike. More easily, maybe, because you're making it trivial for them to demonstrate that you're incompetent. This sounds like an extremely bad idea.






share|improve this answer






















  • You can be fired easily for a slowdown, but in many places (the OP seems to be European) getting fired this way is actually quite profitable for the employee and therefore something companies don't like to do.
    – Peter
    Nov 2 '15 at 15:30











  • Valid points, folks. I can see doing a slowdown as psrt of a union action, but without that kind of support I'm surprised that being fired for incompetence, real or deliberate, is ever good for anyone. Even where governments are union-friendly.
    – keshlam
    Nov 2 '15 at 15:56

















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote














I'm looking for ways how to implement work-to-rule to make software
developer work as inefficient as it can be but still follow the
permanent job contract rules.




  • If you are in a union, make sure you discuss this with your union rep and get union approval beforehand

  • Know and fully understand the specifics of your contract

  • Know and fully understand the specifics of work rules in your locale

  • Make sure everyone in your workgroup sticks together and follows the same plan

  • Be prepared in the event you are fired

  • Be prepared to fight actions against you in a court of law

  • Don't do anything at all that isn't required by your contract

  • Don't ever come in early or stay late if it isn't required by contract

  • Take all the breaks you are entitled to by contract, without exception

This is not something I would ever advise someone to do in my locale (the US).



Where I live you will almost certainly lose your non-union job, and you will very likely lose your professional reputation. Perhaps in your locale and your contract this won't be the case, or perhaps you don't care.






share|improve this answer






















  • "Where I live you will almost certainly lose your job" this is exactly what work-to-rule is NOT about. The question is how to do strike but do not lose your job.
    – Marian Paździoch
    Nov 2 '15 at 14:54






  • 5




    @MarianPaździoch In the US very few IT people are unionized; and without the backing a union gives would be promptly sacked and replaced for trying it.
    – Dan Neely
    Nov 2 '15 at 15:07














up vote
3
down vote














I'm looking for ways how to implement work-to-rule to make software
developer work as inefficient as it can be but still follow the
permanent job contract rules.




  • If you are in a union, make sure you discuss this with your union rep and get union approval beforehand

  • Know and fully understand the specifics of your contract

  • Know and fully understand the specifics of work rules in your locale

  • Make sure everyone in your workgroup sticks together and follows the same plan

  • Be prepared in the event you are fired

  • Be prepared to fight actions against you in a court of law

  • Don't do anything at all that isn't required by your contract

  • Don't ever come in early or stay late if it isn't required by contract

  • Take all the breaks you are entitled to by contract, without exception

This is not something I would ever advise someone to do in my locale (the US).



Where I live you will almost certainly lose your non-union job, and you will very likely lose your professional reputation. Perhaps in your locale and your contract this won't be the case, or perhaps you don't care.






share|improve this answer






















  • "Where I live you will almost certainly lose your job" this is exactly what work-to-rule is NOT about. The question is how to do strike but do not lose your job.
    – Marian Paździoch
    Nov 2 '15 at 14:54






  • 5




    @MarianPaździoch In the US very few IT people are unionized; and without the backing a union gives would be promptly sacked and replaced for trying it.
    – Dan Neely
    Nov 2 '15 at 15:07












up vote
3
down vote










up vote
3
down vote










I'm looking for ways how to implement work-to-rule to make software
developer work as inefficient as it can be but still follow the
permanent job contract rules.




  • If you are in a union, make sure you discuss this with your union rep and get union approval beforehand

  • Know and fully understand the specifics of your contract

  • Know and fully understand the specifics of work rules in your locale

  • Make sure everyone in your workgroup sticks together and follows the same plan

  • Be prepared in the event you are fired

  • Be prepared to fight actions against you in a court of law

  • Don't do anything at all that isn't required by your contract

  • Don't ever come in early or stay late if it isn't required by contract

  • Take all the breaks you are entitled to by contract, without exception

This is not something I would ever advise someone to do in my locale (the US).



Where I live you will almost certainly lose your non-union job, and you will very likely lose your professional reputation. Perhaps in your locale and your contract this won't be the case, or perhaps you don't care.






share|improve this answer















I'm looking for ways how to implement work-to-rule to make software
developer work as inefficient as it can be but still follow the
permanent job contract rules.




  • If you are in a union, make sure you discuss this with your union rep and get union approval beforehand

  • Know and fully understand the specifics of your contract

  • Know and fully understand the specifics of work rules in your locale

  • Make sure everyone in your workgroup sticks together and follows the same plan

  • Be prepared in the event you are fired

  • Be prepared to fight actions against you in a court of law

  • Don't do anything at all that isn't required by your contract

  • Don't ever come in early or stay late if it isn't required by contract

  • Take all the breaks you are entitled to by contract, without exception

This is not something I would ever advise someone to do in my locale (the US).



Where I live you will almost certainly lose your non-union job, and you will very likely lose your professional reputation. Perhaps in your locale and your contract this won't be the case, or perhaps you don't care.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 2 '15 at 15:07

























answered Nov 2 '15 at 14:52









Joe Strazzere

223k104652918




223k104652918











  • "Where I live you will almost certainly lose your job" this is exactly what work-to-rule is NOT about. The question is how to do strike but do not lose your job.
    – Marian Paździoch
    Nov 2 '15 at 14:54






  • 5




    @MarianPaździoch In the US very few IT people are unionized; and without the backing a union gives would be promptly sacked and replaced for trying it.
    – Dan Neely
    Nov 2 '15 at 15:07
















  • "Where I live you will almost certainly lose your job" this is exactly what work-to-rule is NOT about. The question is how to do strike but do not lose your job.
    – Marian Paździoch
    Nov 2 '15 at 14:54






  • 5




    @MarianPaździoch In the US very few IT people are unionized; and without the backing a union gives would be promptly sacked and replaced for trying it.
    – Dan Neely
    Nov 2 '15 at 15:07















"Where I live you will almost certainly lose your job" this is exactly what work-to-rule is NOT about. The question is how to do strike but do not lose your job.
– Marian Paździoch
Nov 2 '15 at 14:54




"Where I live you will almost certainly lose your job" this is exactly what work-to-rule is NOT about. The question is how to do strike but do not lose your job.
– Marian Paździoch
Nov 2 '15 at 14:54




5




5




@MarianPaździoch In the US very few IT people are unionized; and without the backing a union gives would be promptly sacked and replaced for trying it.
– Dan Neely
Nov 2 '15 at 15:07




@MarianPaździoch In the US very few IT people are unionized; and without the backing a union gives would be promptly sacked and replaced for trying it.
– Dan Neely
Nov 2 '15 at 15:07












up vote
0
down vote













At least in the US, you can be fired for a slowdown as easily as for a strike. More easily, maybe, because you're making it trivial for them to demonstrate that you're incompetent. This sounds like an extremely bad idea.






share|improve this answer






















  • You can be fired easily for a slowdown, but in many places (the OP seems to be European) getting fired this way is actually quite profitable for the employee and therefore something companies don't like to do.
    – Peter
    Nov 2 '15 at 15:30











  • Valid points, folks. I can see doing a slowdown as psrt of a union action, but without that kind of support I'm surprised that being fired for incompetence, real or deliberate, is ever good for anyone. Even where governments are union-friendly.
    – keshlam
    Nov 2 '15 at 15:56














up vote
0
down vote













At least in the US, you can be fired for a slowdown as easily as for a strike. More easily, maybe, because you're making it trivial for them to demonstrate that you're incompetent. This sounds like an extremely bad idea.






share|improve this answer






















  • You can be fired easily for a slowdown, but in many places (the OP seems to be European) getting fired this way is actually quite profitable for the employee and therefore something companies don't like to do.
    – Peter
    Nov 2 '15 at 15:30











  • Valid points, folks. I can see doing a slowdown as psrt of a union action, but without that kind of support I'm surprised that being fired for incompetence, real or deliberate, is ever good for anyone. Even where governments are union-friendly.
    – keshlam
    Nov 2 '15 at 15:56












up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









At least in the US, you can be fired for a slowdown as easily as for a strike. More easily, maybe, because you're making it trivial for them to demonstrate that you're incompetent. This sounds like an extremely bad idea.






share|improve this answer














At least in the US, you can be fired for a slowdown as easily as for a strike. More easily, maybe, because you're making it trivial for them to demonstrate that you're incompetent. This sounds like an extremely bad idea.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 2 '15 at 15:56

























answered Nov 2 '15 at 15:01









keshlam

41.5k1267144




41.5k1267144











  • You can be fired easily for a slowdown, but in many places (the OP seems to be European) getting fired this way is actually quite profitable for the employee and therefore something companies don't like to do.
    – Peter
    Nov 2 '15 at 15:30











  • Valid points, folks. I can see doing a slowdown as psrt of a union action, but without that kind of support I'm surprised that being fired for incompetence, real or deliberate, is ever good for anyone. Even where governments are union-friendly.
    – keshlam
    Nov 2 '15 at 15:56
















  • You can be fired easily for a slowdown, but in many places (the OP seems to be European) getting fired this way is actually quite profitable for the employee and therefore something companies don't like to do.
    – Peter
    Nov 2 '15 at 15:30











  • Valid points, folks. I can see doing a slowdown as psrt of a union action, but without that kind of support I'm surprised that being fired for incompetence, real or deliberate, is ever good for anyone. Even where governments are union-friendly.
    – keshlam
    Nov 2 '15 at 15:56















You can be fired easily for a slowdown, but in many places (the OP seems to be European) getting fired this way is actually quite profitable for the employee and therefore something companies don't like to do.
– Peter
Nov 2 '15 at 15:30





You can be fired easily for a slowdown, but in many places (the OP seems to be European) getting fired this way is actually quite profitable for the employee and therefore something companies don't like to do.
– Peter
Nov 2 '15 at 15:30













Valid points, folks. I can see doing a slowdown as psrt of a union action, but without that kind of support I'm surprised that being fired for incompetence, real or deliberate, is ever good for anyone. Even where governments are union-friendly.
– keshlam
Nov 2 '15 at 15:56




Valid points, folks. I can see doing a slowdown as psrt of a union action, but without that kind of support I'm surprised that being fired for incompetence, real or deliberate, is ever good for anyone. Even where governments are union-friendly.
– keshlam
Nov 2 '15 at 15:56


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What does second last employer means? [closed]

List of Gilmore Girls characters

Confectionery