How to cleverly complain in one's appraisal that new hires get more compensations than current ones [duplicate]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
-1
down vote

favorite













This question already has an answer here:



  • How should I properly approach my boss if I'm feeling underpaid?

    8 answers



  • How do I politely decline contributing to boss's Christmas present?

    4 answers



I work with a small company.



2 new 'software developer' hires get more compensation than the currently employed ones, based on their experience (years) in technology which has around 15% contribution in the software.



Whereas current hires who have mastered all of the technologies and also the product get less compensation.



How would you explain this to your manager in your appraisal?







share|improve this question














marked as duplicate by gnat, yochannah, IDrinkandIKnowThings, Jim G., Michael Grubey Nov 25 '14 at 3:24


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 1




    Prior to engaging in any discussion on this topic you might want to review company policy on employees discussing their compensation with other employees. Some companies consider this a firing offense.
    – NotMe
    Nov 21 '14 at 15:10






  • 1




    Unfortunately, where you started often determines where you are
    – Adel
    Nov 21 '14 at 16:23










  • workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/1717/…
    – HLGEM
    Nov 21 '14 at 20:10










  • Mastery of technologies is only a teeny tiny portion of why people get higher salaries. It is, by far, not the most critical thing in getting more money. Things I can think of whitout even trying are politics, negotiating skill, market rates at the time of hire, value of theh position to the business, performance of the individual, realtionship of the individual to the person setting the salary. It is so far down the list that it is basically not considered at all.
    – HLGEM
    Nov 21 '14 at 20:14






  • 1




    You could do it in binary, or with encryption. No! A riddle. That is how you cleverly complain. Use a riddle.
    – bharal
    Nov 22 '14 at 15:27
















up vote
-1
down vote

favorite













This question already has an answer here:



  • How should I properly approach my boss if I'm feeling underpaid?

    8 answers



  • How do I politely decline contributing to boss's Christmas present?

    4 answers



I work with a small company.



2 new 'software developer' hires get more compensation than the currently employed ones, based on their experience (years) in technology which has around 15% contribution in the software.



Whereas current hires who have mastered all of the technologies and also the product get less compensation.



How would you explain this to your manager in your appraisal?







share|improve this question














marked as duplicate by gnat, yochannah, IDrinkandIKnowThings, Jim G., Michael Grubey Nov 25 '14 at 3:24


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 1




    Prior to engaging in any discussion on this topic you might want to review company policy on employees discussing their compensation with other employees. Some companies consider this a firing offense.
    – NotMe
    Nov 21 '14 at 15:10






  • 1




    Unfortunately, where you started often determines where you are
    – Adel
    Nov 21 '14 at 16:23










  • workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/1717/…
    – HLGEM
    Nov 21 '14 at 20:10










  • Mastery of technologies is only a teeny tiny portion of why people get higher salaries. It is, by far, not the most critical thing in getting more money. Things I can think of whitout even trying are politics, negotiating skill, market rates at the time of hire, value of theh position to the business, performance of the individual, realtionship of the individual to the person setting the salary. It is so far down the list that it is basically not considered at all.
    – HLGEM
    Nov 21 '14 at 20:14






  • 1




    You could do it in binary, or with encryption. No! A riddle. That is how you cleverly complain. Use a riddle.
    – bharal
    Nov 22 '14 at 15:27












up vote
-1
down vote

favorite









up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












This question already has an answer here:



  • How should I properly approach my boss if I'm feeling underpaid?

    8 answers



  • How do I politely decline contributing to boss's Christmas present?

    4 answers



I work with a small company.



2 new 'software developer' hires get more compensation than the currently employed ones, based on their experience (years) in technology which has around 15% contribution in the software.



Whereas current hires who have mastered all of the technologies and also the product get less compensation.



How would you explain this to your manager in your appraisal?







share|improve this question















This question already has an answer here:



  • How should I properly approach my boss if I'm feeling underpaid?

    8 answers



  • How do I politely decline contributing to boss's Christmas present?

    4 answers



I work with a small company.



2 new 'software developer' hires get more compensation than the currently employed ones, based on their experience (years) in technology which has around 15% contribution in the software.



Whereas current hires who have mastered all of the technologies and also the product get less compensation.



How would you explain this to your manager in your appraisal?





This question already has an answer here:



  • How should I properly approach my boss if I'm feeling underpaid?

    8 answers



  • How do I politely decline contributing to boss's Christmas present?

    4 answers









share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 21 '14 at 19:51









jmorc

775818




775818










asked Nov 21 '14 at 9:45









NULL

2,65331125




2,65331125




marked as duplicate by gnat, yochannah, IDrinkandIKnowThings, Jim G., Michael Grubey Nov 25 '14 at 3:24


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by gnat, yochannah, IDrinkandIKnowThings, Jim G., Michael Grubey Nov 25 '14 at 3:24


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









  • 1




    Prior to engaging in any discussion on this topic you might want to review company policy on employees discussing their compensation with other employees. Some companies consider this a firing offense.
    – NotMe
    Nov 21 '14 at 15:10






  • 1




    Unfortunately, where you started often determines where you are
    – Adel
    Nov 21 '14 at 16:23










  • workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/1717/…
    – HLGEM
    Nov 21 '14 at 20:10










  • Mastery of technologies is only a teeny tiny portion of why people get higher salaries. It is, by far, not the most critical thing in getting more money. Things I can think of whitout even trying are politics, negotiating skill, market rates at the time of hire, value of theh position to the business, performance of the individual, realtionship of the individual to the person setting the salary. It is so far down the list that it is basically not considered at all.
    – HLGEM
    Nov 21 '14 at 20:14






  • 1




    You could do it in binary, or with encryption. No! A riddle. That is how you cleverly complain. Use a riddle.
    – bharal
    Nov 22 '14 at 15:27












  • 1




    Prior to engaging in any discussion on this topic you might want to review company policy on employees discussing their compensation with other employees. Some companies consider this a firing offense.
    – NotMe
    Nov 21 '14 at 15:10






  • 1




    Unfortunately, where you started often determines where you are
    – Adel
    Nov 21 '14 at 16:23










  • workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/1717/…
    – HLGEM
    Nov 21 '14 at 20:10










  • Mastery of technologies is only a teeny tiny portion of why people get higher salaries. It is, by far, not the most critical thing in getting more money. Things I can think of whitout even trying are politics, negotiating skill, market rates at the time of hire, value of theh position to the business, performance of the individual, realtionship of the individual to the person setting the salary. It is so far down the list that it is basically not considered at all.
    – HLGEM
    Nov 21 '14 at 20:14






  • 1




    You could do it in binary, or with encryption. No! A riddle. That is how you cleverly complain. Use a riddle.
    – bharal
    Nov 22 '14 at 15:27







1




1




Prior to engaging in any discussion on this topic you might want to review company policy on employees discussing their compensation with other employees. Some companies consider this a firing offense.
– NotMe
Nov 21 '14 at 15:10




Prior to engaging in any discussion on this topic you might want to review company policy on employees discussing their compensation with other employees. Some companies consider this a firing offense.
– NotMe
Nov 21 '14 at 15:10




1




1




Unfortunately, where you started often determines where you are
– Adel
Nov 21 '14 at 16:23




Unfortunately, where you started often determines where you are
– Adel
Nov 21 '14 at 16:23












workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/1717/…
– HLGEM
Nov 21 '14 at 20:10




workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/1717/…
– HLGEM
Nov 21 '14 at 20:10












Mastery of technologies is only a teeny tiny portion of why people get higher salaries. It is, by far, not the most critical thing in getting more money. Things I can think of whitout even trying are politics, negotiating skill, market rates at the time of hire, value of theh position to the business, performance of the individual, realtionship of the individual to the person setting the salary. It is so far down the list that it is basically not considered at all.
– HLGEM
Nov 21 '14 at 20:14




Mastery of technologies is only a teeny tiny portion of why people get higher salaries. It is, by far, not the most critical thing in getting more money. Things I can think of whitout even trying are politics, negotiating skill, market rates at the time of hire, value of theh position to the business, performance of the individual, realtionship of the individual to the person setting the salary. It is so far down the list that it is basically not considered at all.
– HLGEM
Nov 21 '14 at 20:14




1




1




You could do it in binary, or with encryption. No! A riddle. That is how you cleverly complain. Use a riddle.
– bharal
Nov 22 '14 at 15:27




You could do it in binary, or with encryption. No! A riddle. That is how you cleverly complain. Use a riddle.
– bharal
Nov 22 '14 at 15:27










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
13
down vote



accepted










Don't try to be clever, just be direct. Arrange a private meeting with your boss, explain your grievance clearly and ask what the rationale is.



My guess is that they offered what they needed to get more experienced staff, and perhaps thought that anyone who had a problem with it would raise it.



Pay in private enterprise is rarely done on the basis of fairness, but based on what you need to pay someone to get them to stay. If you're fed up, get an offer at another company; then you have a choice and your current employer knows they have to compete. In negotiation this is called a 'viable alternative'.



Bosses have to balance 2 things: a desire to reduce costs (of which pay is a large one) and desire to retain good staff. Being clear and open is the best way to deal with the issue.






share|improve this answer




















  • Do not expect to get a raise if you raise the issue this way.
    – HLGEM
    Nov 21 '14 at 20:05

















up vote
12
down vote













Never ever under any circumstances ask for a pay raise based on what someone else gets. People with less experience than you may make far more money and people with more may make less. It depends on what the market will bear and the negotiating skills of the person when they were hired. There it would be a rare company that will pay you more becasue they pay somone else more.



By all means discuss salary at the review (although I would bring up the subject before the review, at teh review itself, the amount is often set in stone because it was a result of weeks or even months of negotiations between managers to fit all pay raises into the budget.) but do it iterms of what you are contributing and how much more valuable you are now than when your current salary was set. If you write a self-appraisal, themn make sure you document your accomplishments well. That helps your boss sell gving a higher raise to you to the people with the money.






share|improve this answer
















  • 4




    Absolutely. Use the appraisal to give your boss the ammunition with which to argue that you're a top performer and should get performance bonuses/performance raises/promotions... but make your request to your boss OUTSIDE that document. It's often safer and more effective to put it as "It's been a while since I've seen a raise; what would I have to improve on to get one?" That puts it in terms of your trying to be an even more valued employee, rather than your being a disgruntled one, and tends to have more productive results.
    – keshlam
    Nov 21 '14 at 14:35

















up vote
5
down vote













Any pay rise in an appraisal is about the value YOU bring to a company. It is likely to have been agreed in advance of your appraisal, and your manager is unlikely to have room to maneuver.



You can't really compare to newer hires, unless your company has a fixed grade/salary structure (usually public sector).



For all that people say, it is not about negitiation (or holding your company hostage with another offer), the market dominates.



You were probably recruited within the last five years, the credit crunch meant there were many vying for your role and you were likely the best, but the glut of choice for the employer meant they could offer low in salary. Now the market is pretty hot, people getting roles more easily so even mediocre to poor candidates need good deals to secure.



Does this mean the employer should match across the board? Most couldn't do this, and it would mean not taking on new staff, so making your life harder.



The simple truth is you need to have a unique selling point, or take another offer if you want more, being good at you job isn't enough on its own (and hostage taking will get you pushed out as soon as you are no longer vital).






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    You need to hide the fact that you know what others are making. Disclosing this during the review could be a very bad move and won't help you in negotiation.



    You have to show that you are pulling your own weight or possibly more. Then you should ask for more money than that the others make. Your boss may or may not counter-offer. Hopefully you will learn what his reasoning is in determining your salary.



    He may say the company doesn't have more money to pay you. If a counter-offer is still under their salary but he claims he can't pay you more than anyone else, now you know how to tell when he's lying.






    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      This question puts the cart before the horse.



      Employers don't pay to make you feel better. And employers certainly don't want to reward people for complaining about their level of pay. Employers pay to keep you. Employers pay for people who have demonstrable value. So unless you have a better opportunity and you're prepared to walk, and mean it, talking about pay AT ALL is usually a losing proposition. Makes no difference whether its in the appraisal or not.



      Until you have a better opportunity, you have little to negotiate with. Many employers will call your bluff right up until what you thought was the last second - and then call your bluff well past that time too. Remember, discussions about pay almost never endear you to management. Those discussions create some uncertainty and mistrust no matter what the outcome. That's bad for business - which is about profit and risk reduction.



      Pay discussions are also more challenging than more routine situations to handle professionally. So make sure you have a really good reason (i.e. substantially higher offer/better opportunity) before embarking down that path.






      share|improve this answer



























        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes








        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        13
        down vote



        accepted










        Don't try to be clever, just be direct. Arrange a private meeting with your boss, explain your grievance clearly and ask what the rationale is.



        My guess is that they offered what they needed to get more experienced staff, and perhaps thought that anyone who had a problem with it would raise it.



        Pay in private enterprise is rarely done on the basis of fairness, but based on what you need to pay someone to get them to stay. If you're fed up, get an offer at another company; then you have a choice and your current employer knows they have to compete. In negotiation this is called a 'viable alternative'.



        Bosses have to balance 2 things: a desire to reduce costs (of which pay is a large one) and desire to retain good staff. Being clear and open is the best way to deal with the issue.






        share|improve this answer




















        • Do not expect to get a raise if you raise the issue this way.
          – HLGEM
          Nov 21 '14 at 20:05














        up vote
        13
        down vote



        accepted










        Don't try to be clever, just be direct. Arrange a private meeting with your boss, explain your grievance clearly and ask what the rationale is.



        My guess is that they offered what they needed to get more experienced staff, and perhaps thought that anyone who had a problem with it would raise it.



        Pay in private enterprise is rarely done on the basis of fairness, but based on what you need to pay someone to get them to stay. If you're fed up, get an offer at another company; then you have a choice and your current employer knows they have to compete. In negotiation this is called a 'viable alternative'.



        Bosses have to balance 2 things: a desire to reduce costs (of which pay is a large one) and desire to retain good staff. Being clear and open is the best way to deal with the issue.






        share|improve this answer




















        • Do not expect to get a raise if you raise the issue this way.
          – HLGEM
          Nov 21 '14 at 20:05












        up vote
        13
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        13
        down vote



        accepted






        Don't try to be clever, just be direct. Arrange a private meeting with your boss, explain your grievance clearly and ask what the rationale is.



        My guess is that they offered what they needed to get more experienced staff, and perhaps thought that anyone who had a problem with it would raise it.



        Pay in private enterprise is rarely done on the basis of fairness, but based on what you need to pay someone to get them to stay. If you're fed up, get an offer at another company; then you have a choice and your current employer knows they have to compete. In negotiation this is called a 'viable alternative'.



        Bosses have to balance 2 things: a desire to reduce costs (of which pay is a large one) and desire to retain good staff. Being clear and open is the best way to deal with the issue.






        share|improve this answer












        Don't try to be clever, just be direct. Arrange a private meeting with your boss, explain your grievance clearly and ask what the rationale is.



        My guess is that they offered what they needed to get more experienced staff, and perhaps thought that anyone who had a problem with it would raise it.



        Pay in private enterprise is rarely done on the basis of fairness, but based on what you need to pay someone to get them to stay. If you're fed up, get an offer at another company; then you have a choice and your current employer knows they have to compete. In negotiation this is called a 'viable alternative'.



        Bosses have to balance 2 things: a desire to reduce costs (of which pay is a large one) and desire to retain good staff. Being clear and open is the best way to deal with the issue.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 21 '14 at 10:09









        Phil H

        1,010712




        1,010712











        • Do not expect to get a raise if you raise the issue this way.
          – HLGEM
          Nov 21 '14 at 20:05
















        • Do not expect to get a raise if you raise the issue this way.
          – HLGEM
          Nov 21 '14 at 20:05















        Do not expect to get a raise if you raise the issue this way.
        – HLGEM
        Nov 21 '14 at 20:05




        Do not expect to get a raise if you raise the issue this way.
        – HLGEM
        Nov 21 '14 at 20:05












        up vote
        12
        down vote













        Never ever under any circumstances ask for a pay raise based on what someone else gets. People with less experience than you may make far more money and people with more may make less. It depends on what the market will bear and the negotiating skills of the person when they were hired. There it would be a rare company that will pay you more becasue they pay somone else more.



        By all means discuss salary at the review (although I would bring up the subject before the review, at teh review itself, the amount is often set in stone because it was a result of weeks or even months of negotiations between managers to fit all pay raises into the budget.) but do it iterms of what you are contributing and how much more valuable you are now than when your current salary was set. If you write a self-appraisal, themn make sure you document your accomplishments well. That helps your boss sell gving a higher raise to you to the people with the money.






        share|improve this answer
















        • 4




          Absolutely. Use the appraisal to give your boss the ammunition with which to argue that you're a top performer and should get performance bonuses/performance raises/promotions... but make your request to your boss OUTSIDE that document. It's often safer and more effective to put it as "It's been a while since I've seen a raise; what would I have to improve on to get one?" That puts it in terms of your trying to be an even more valued employee, rather than your being a disgruntled one, and tends to have more productive results.
          – keshlam
          Nov 21 '14 at 14:35














        up vote
        12
        down vote













        Never ever under any circumstances ask for a pay raise based on what someone else gets. People with less experience than you may make far more money and people with more may make less. It depends on what the market will bear and the negotiating skills of the person when they were hired. There it would be a rare company that will pay you more becasue they pay somone else more.



        By all means discuss salary at the review (although I would bring up the subject before the review, at teh review itself, the amount is often set in stone because it was a result of weeks or even months of negotiations between managers to fit all pay raises into the budget.) but do it iterms of what you are contributing and how much more valuable you are now than when your current salary was set. If you write a self-appraisal, themn make sure you document your accomplishments well. That helps your boss sell gving a higher raise to you to the people with the money.






        share|improve this answer
















        • 4




          Absolutely. Use the appraisal to give your boss the ammunition with which to argue that you're a top performer and should get performance bonuses/performance raises/promotions... but make your request to your boss OUTSIDE that document. It's often safer and more effective to put it as "It's been a while since I've seen a raise; what would I have to improve on to get one?" That puts it in terms of your trying to be an even more valued employee, rather than your being a disgruntled one, and tends to have more productive results.
          – keshlam
          Nov 21 '14 at 14:35












        up vote
        12
        down vote










        up vote
        12
        down vote









        Never ever under any circumstances ask for a pay raise based on what someone else gets. People with less experience than you may make far more money and people with more may make less. It depends on what the market will bear and the negotiating skills of the person when they were hired. There it would be a rare company that will pay you more becasue they pay somone else more.



        By all means discuss salary at the review (although I would bring up the subject before the review, at teh review itself, the amount is often set in stone because it was a result of weeks or even months of negotiations between managers to fit all pay raises into the budget.) but do it iterms of what you are contributing and how much more valuable you are now than when your current salary was set. If you write a self-appraisal, themn make sure you document your accomplishments well. That helps your boss sell gving a higher raise to you to the people with the money.






        share|improve this answer












        Never ever under any circumstances ask for a pay raise based on what someone else gets. People with less experience than you may make far more money and people with more may make less. It depends on what the market will bear and the negotiating skills of the person when they were hired. There it would be a rare company that will pay you more becasue they pay somone else more.



        By all means discuss salary at the review (although I would bring up the subject before the review, at teh review itself, the amount is often set in stone because it was a result of weeks or even months of negotiations between managers to fit all pay raises into the budget.) but do it iterms of what you are contributing and how much more valuable you are now than when your current salary was set. If you write a self-appraisal, themn make sure you document your accomplishments well. That helps your boss sell gving a higher raise to you to the people with the money.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 21 '14 at 13:54









        HLGEM

        133k25226489




        133k25226489







        • 4




          Absolutely. Use the appraisal to give your boss the ammunition with which to argue that you're a top performer and should get performance bonuses/performance raises/promotions... but make your request to your boss OUTSIDE that document. It's often safer and more effective to put it as "It's been a while since I've seen a raise; what would I have to improve on to get one?" That puts it in terms of your trying to be an even more valued employee, rather than your being a disgruntled one, and tends to have more productive results.
          – keshlam
          Nov 21 '14 at 14:35












        • 4




          Absolutely. Use the appraisal to give your boss the ammunition with which to argue that you're a top performer and should get performance bonuses/performance raises/promotions... but make your request to your boss OUTSIDE that document. It's often safer and more effective to put it as "It's been a while since I've seen a raise; what would I have to improve on to get one?" That puts it in terms of your trying to be an even more valued employee, rather than your being a disgruntled one, and tends to have more productive results.
          – keshlam
          Nov 21 '14 at 14:35







        4




        4




        Absolutely. Use the appraisal to give your boss the ammunition with which to argue that you're a top performer and should get performance bonuses/performance raises/promotions... but make your request to your boss OUTSIDE that document. It's often safer and more effective to put it as "It's been a while since I've seen a raise; what would I have to improve on to get one?" That puts it in terms of your trying to be an even more valued employee, rather than your being a disgruntled one, and tends to have more productive results.
        – keshlam
        Nov 21 '14 at 14:35




        Absolutely. Use the appraisal to give your boss the ammunition with which to argue that you're a top performer and should get performance bonuses/performance raises/promotions... but make your request to your boss OUTSIDE that document. It's often safer and more effective to put it as "It's been a while since I've seen a raise; what would I have to improve on to get one?" That puts it in terms of your trying to be an even more valued employee, rather than your being a disgruntled one, and tends to have more productive results.
        – keshlam
        Nov 21 '14 at 14:35










        up vote
        5
        down vote













        Any pay rise in an appraisal is about the value YOU bring to a company. It is likely to have been agreed in advance of your appraisal, and your manager is unlikely to have room to maneuver.



        You can't really compare to newer hires, unless your company has a fixed grade/salary structure (usually public sector).



        For all that people say, it is not about negitiation (or holding your company hostage with another offer), the market dominates.



        You were probably recruited within the last five years, the credit crunch meant there were many vying for your role and you were likely the best, but the glut of choice for the employer meant they could offer low in salary. Now the market is pretty hot, people getting roles more easily so even mediocre to poor candidates need good deals to secure.



        Does this mean the employer should match across the board? Most couldn't do this, and it would mean not taking on new staff, so making your life harder.



        The simple truth is you need to have a unique selling point, or take another offer if you want more, being good at you job isn't enough on its own (and hostage taking will get you pushed out as soon as you are no longer vital).






        share|improve this answer
























          up vote
          5
          down vote













          Any pay rise in an appraisal is about the value YOU bring to a company. It is likely to have been agreed in advance of your appraisal, and your manager is unlikely to have room to maneuver.



          You can't really compare to newer hires, unless your company has a fixed grade/salary structure (usually public sector).



          For all that people say, it is not about negitiation (or holding your company hostage with another offer), the market dominates.



          You were probably recruited within the last five years, the credit crunch meant there were many vying for your role and you were likely the best, but the glut of choice for the employer meant they could offer low in salary. Now the market is pretty hot, people getting roles more easily so even mediocre to poor candidates need good deals to secure.



          Does this mean the employer should match across the board? Most couldn't do this, and it would mean not taking on new staff, so making your life harder.



          The simple truth is you need to have a unique selling point, or take another offer if you want more, being good at you job isn't enough on its own (and hostage taking will get you pushed out as soon as you are no longer vital).






          share|improve this answer






















            up vote
            5
            down vote










            up vote
            5
            down vote









            Any pay rise in an appraisal is about the value YOU bring to a company. It is likely to have been agreed in advance of your appraisal, and your manager is unlikely to have room to maneuver.



            You can't really compare to newer hires, unless your company has a fixed grade/salary structure (usually public sector).



            For all that people say, it is not about negitiation (or holding your company hostage with another offer), the market dominates.



            You were probably recruited within the last five years, the credit crunch meant there were many vying for your role and you were likely the best, but the glut of choice for the employer meant they could offer low in salary. Now the market is pretty hot, people getting roles more easily so even mediocre to poor candidates need good deals to secure.



            Does this mean the employer should match across the board? Most couldn't do this, and it would mean not taking on new staff, so making your life harder.



            The simple truth is you need to have a unique selling point, or take another offer if you want more, being good at you job isn't enough on its own (and hostage taking will get you pushed out as soon as you are no longer vital).






            share|improve this answer












            Any pay rise in an appraisal is about the value YOU bring to a company. It is likely to have been agreed in advance of your appraisal, and your manager is unlikely to have room to maneuver.



            You can't really compare to newer hires, unless your company has a fixed grade/salary structure (usually public sector).



            For all that people say, it is not about negitiation (or holding your company hostage with another offer), the market dominates.



            You were probably recruited within the last five years, the credit crunch meant there were many vying for your role and you were likely the best, but the glut of choice for the employer meant they could offer low in salary. Now the market is pretty hot, people getting roles more easily so even mediocre to poor candidates need good deals to secure.



            Does this mean the employer should match across the board? Most couldn't do this, and it would mean not taking on new staff, so making your life harder.



            The simple truth is you need to have a unique selling point, or take another offer if you want more, being good at you job isn't enough on its own (and hostage taking will get you pushed out as soon as you are no longer vital).







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Nov 21 '14 at 14:22









            The Wandering Dev Manager

            29.8k956107




            29.8k956107




















                up vote
                0
                down vote













                You need to hide the fact that you know what others are making. Disclosing this during the review could be a very bad move and won't help you in negotiation.



                You have to show that you are pulling your own weight or possibly more. Then you should ask for more money than that the others make. Your boss may or may not counter-offer. Hopefully you will learn what his reasoning is in determining your salary.



                He may say the company doesn't have more money to pay you. If a counter-offer is still under their salary but he claims he can't pay you more than anyone else, now you know how to tell when he's lying.






                share|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote













                  You need to hide the fact that you know what others are making. Disclosing this during the review could be a very bad move and won't help you in negotiation.



                  You have to show that you are pulling your own weight or possibly more. Then you should ask for more money than that the others make. Your boss may or may not counter-offer. Hopefully you will learn what his reasoning is in determining your salary.



                  He may say the company doesn't have more money to pay you. If a counter-offer is still under their salary but he claims he can't pay you more than anyone else, now you know how to tell when he's lying.






                  share|improve this answer






















                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote









                    You need to hide the fact that you know what others are making. Disclosing this during the review could be a very bad move and won't help you in negotiation.



                    You have to show that you are pulling your own weight or possibly more. Then you should ask for more money than that the others make. Your boss may or may not counter-offer. Hopefully you will learn what his reasoning is in determining your salary.



                    He may say the company doesn't have more money to pay you. If a counter-offer is still under their salary but he claims he can't pay you more than anyone else, now you know how to tell when he's lying.






                    share|improve this answer












                    You need to hide the fact that you know what others are making. Disclosing this during the review could be a very bad move and won't help you in negotiation.



                    You have to show that you are pulling your own weight or possibly more. Then you should ask for more money than that the others make. Your boss may or may not counter-offer. Hopefully you will learn what his reasoning is in determining your salary.



                    He may say the company doesn't have more money to pay you. If a counter-offer is still under their salary but he claims he can't pay you more than anyone else, now you know how to tell when he's lying.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Nov 21 '14 at 18:39







                    user8365



























                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        This question puts the cart before the horse.



                        Employers don't pay to make you feel better. And employers certainly don't want to reward people for complaining about their level of pay. Employers pay to keep you. Employers pay for people who have demonstrable value. So unless you have a better opportunity and you're prepared to walk, and mean it, talking about pay AT ALL is usually a losing proposition. Makes no difference whether its in the appraisal or not.



                        Until you have a better opportunity, you have little to negotiate with. Many employers will call your bluff right up until what you thought was the last second - and then call your bluff well past that time too. Remember, discussions about pay almost never endear you to management. Those discussions create some uncertainty and mistrust no matter what the outcome. That's bad for business - which is about profit and risk reduction.



                        Pay discussions are also more challenging than more routine situations to handle professionally. So make sure you have a really good reason (i.e. substantially higher offer/better opportunity) before embarking down that path.






                        share|improve this answer
























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote













                          This question puts the cart before the horse.



                          Employers don't pay to make you feel better. And employers certainly don't want to reward people for complaining about their level of pay. Employers pay to keep you. Employers pay for people who have demonstrable value. So unless you have a better opportunity and you're prepared to walk, and mean it, talking about pay AT ALL is usually a losing proposition. Makes no difference whether its in the appraisal or not.



                          Until you have a better opportunity, you have little to negotiate with. Many employers will call your bluff right up until what you thought was the last second - and then call your bluff well past that time too. Remember, discussions about pay almost never endear you to management. Those discussions create some uncertainty and mistrust no matter what the outcome. That's bad for business - which is about profit and risk reduction.



                          Pay discussions are also more challenging than more routine situations to handle professionally. So make sure you have a really good reason (i.e. substantially higher offer/better opportunity) before embarking down that path.






                          share|improve this answer






















                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote









                            This question puts the cart before the horse.



                            Employers don't pay to make you feel better. And employers certainly don't want to reward people for complaining about their level of pay. Employers pay to keep you. Employers pay for people who have demonstrable value. So unless you have a better opportunity and you're prepared to walk, and mean it, talking about pay AT ALL is usually a losing proposition. Makes no difference whether its in the appraisal or not.



                            Until you have a better opportunity, you have little to negotiate with. Many employers will call your bluff right up until what you thought was the last second - and then call your bluff well past that time too. Remember, discussions about pay almost never endear you to management. Those discussions create some uncertainty and mistrust no matter what the outcome. That's bad for business - which is about profit and risk reduction.



                            Pay discussions are also more challenging than more routine situations to handle professionally. So make sure you have a really good reason (i.e. substantially higher offer/better opportunity) before embarking down that path.






                            share|improve this answer












                            This question puts the cart before the horse.



                            Employers don't pay to make you feel better. And employers certainly don't want to reward people for complaining about their level of pay. Employers pay to keep you. Employers pay for people who have demonstrable value. So unless you have a better opportunity and you're prepared to walk, and mean it, talking about pay AT ALL is usually a losing proposition. Makes no difference whether its in the appraisal or not.



                            Until you have a better opportunity, you have little to negotiate with. Many employers will call your bluff right up until what you thought was the last second - and then call your bluff well past that time too. Remember, discussions about pay almost never endear you to management. Those discussions create some uncertainty and mistrust no matter what the outcome. That's bad for business - which is about profit and risk reduction.



                            Pay discussions are also more challenging than more routine situations to handle professionally. So make sure you have a really good reason (i.e. substantially higher offer/better opportunity) before embarking down that path.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Nov 22 '14 at 2:45









                            Brad Thomas

                            2,744820




                            2,744820












                                Comments

                                Popular posts from this blog

                                What does second last employer means? [closed]

                                List of Gilmore Girls characters

                                Confectionery