Mixing
![How do I know if my boss is having me do almost all of the work? [closed]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgjbpfN9tAutmK93bJRC3ZoROZzi2TJDms5n8_qJuhgE0a9b52OOHayv3NGT8igAdFL7byXNst-_1DZK5SjrIJ28_6RQPUpBROqMs5s6jo-ZsjX8kjDwfxJufIitH3TaQRXWaGSQKRQib-f/s72-c/1.jpg)
Ethical to accept job offer I may not start
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Is it ethical to accept a job offer if I may accept another position before starting?
A company extended to me a job offer; they offered median compensation for my field and area. I am also a candidate for a second position which would open new career opportunities and offer incomparably greater compensation. The search for the second position will be complete before the starting date of the offered job. If I am selected for the second position I would accept it. Is it ethical to accept the offered job even though there's a not-insignificant chance that I would retract my acceptance?
Closely related: Leaving a job very early to accept another offer
job-offer ethics job-acceptance
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:48
Community♦
1
asked May 1 '15 at 17:06
user34716
182
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Is it ethical to accept a job offer if I may accept another position before starting?
A company extended to me a job offer; they offered median compensation for my field and area. I am also a candidate for a second position which would open new career opportunities and offer incomparably greater compensation. The search for the second position will be complete before the starting date of the offered job. If I am selected for the second position I would accept it. Is it ethical to accept the offered job even though there's a not-insignificant chance that I would retract my acceptance?
Closely related: Leaving a job very early to accept another offer
job-offer ethics job-acceptance
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:48
Community♦
1
asked May 1 '15 at 17:06
user34716
182
1
If you're concerned about the ethics, tell them you're very interested but are want to hear the results of one more interview, and ask when they need you to commit by before they offer the job to the next candidate. That may let the situation resolve itself without having to decide between settling for the lesser job or breaking your word.
– keshlam
May 1 '15 at 17:38
1
@JoeStrazzere That's not an entirely appropriate analogy. We like to pretend that employers and employees are on equal footing and, as such, would be interchangeable. However, the consequences of an employee being unemployed and an employer having a vacant position are quite different.
– user34716
May 1 '15 at 22:50
1
If you make someone else's life harder to make your own life easier, ethics exist to tell us "you shouldn't do that". Is it tantamount to burglary or worse? No, certainly not. Is it often a question of degree and extent? Yeah, it usually is - if you are quitting McDonald's to join Google, I think you should apologize for the inconvenience and then sleep soundly if you can't find a nicer way to handle the situation. Everything else is a matter of degree, and you should certainly be careful of minimizing the cost to someone else to rationalize doing what is easiest and most profitable for you.
– BrianH
May 2 '15 at 3:15
1
Basic principle: if you are asking whether something is unethical, that means you already know the answer but are hoping to find an excuse.
– keshlam
May 3 '15 at 18:34
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Is it ethical to accept a job offer if I may accept another position before starting?
A company extended to me a job offer; they offered median compensation for my field and area. I am also a candidate for a second position which would open new career opportunities and offer incomparably greater compensation. The search for the second position will be complete before the starting date of the offered job. If I am selected for the second position I would accept it. Is it ethical to accept the offered job even though there's a not-insignificant chance that I would retract my acceptance?
Closely related: Leaving a job very early to accept another offer
job-offer ethics job-acceptance
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:48
Community♦
1
asked May 1 '15 at 17:06
user34716
182
Is it ethical to accept a job offer if I may accept another position before starting?
A company extended to me a job offer; they offered median compensation for my field and area. I am also a candidate for a second position which would open new career opportunities and offer incomparably greater compensation. The search for the second position will be complete before the starting date of the offered job. If I am selected for the second position I would accept it. Is it ethical to accept the offered job even though there's a not-insignificant chance that I would retract my acceptance?
Closely related: Leaving a job very early to accept another offer
job-offer ethics job-acceptance
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:48
Community♦
1
asked May 1 '15 at 17:06
user34716
182
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:48
Community♦
1
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:48
Community♦
1
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:48
Community♦
1
1
asked May 1 '15 at 17:06
user34716
182
asked May 1 '15 at 17:06
user34716
182
asked May 1 '15 at 17:06
user34716
182
182
1
If you're concerned about the ethics, tell them you're very interested but are want to hear the results of one more interview, and ask when they need you to commit by before they offer the job to the next candidate. That may let the situation resolve itself without having to decide between settling for the lesser job or breaking your word.
– keshlam
May 1 '15 at 17:38
1
@JoeStrazzere That's not an entirely appropriate analogy. We like to pretend that employers and employees are on equal footing and, as such, would be interchangeable. However, the consequences of an employee being unemployed and an employer having a vacant position are quite different.
– user34716
May 1 '15 at 22:50
1
If you make someone else's life harder to make your own life easier, ethics exist to tell us "you shouldn't do that". Is it tantamount to burglary or worse? No, certainly not. Is it often a question of degree and extent? Yeah, it usually is - if you are quitting McDonald's to join Google, I think you should apologize for the inconvenience and then sleep soundly if you can't find a nicer way to handle the situation. Everything else is a matter of degree, and you should certainly be careful of minimizing the cost to someone else to rationalize doing what is easiest and most profitable for you.
– BrianH
May 2 '15 at 3:15
1
Basic principle: if you are asking whether something is unethical, that means you already know the answer but are hoping to find an excuse.
– keshlam
May 3 '15 at 18:34
suggest improvements |Â
1
If you're concerned about the ethics, tell them you're very interested but are want to hear the results of one more interview, and ask when they need you to commit by before they offer the job to the next candidate. That may let the situation resolve itself without having to decide between settling for the lesser job or breaking your word.
– keshlam
May 1 '15 at 17:38
1
@JoeStrazzere That's not an entirely appropriate analogy. We like to pretend that employers and employees are on equal footing and, as such, would be interchangeable. However, the consequences of an employee being unemployed and an employer having a vacant position are quite different.
– user34716
May 1 '15 at 22:50
1
If you make someone else's life harder to make your own life easier, ethics exist to tell us "you shouldn't do that". Is it tantamount to burglary or worse? No, certainly not. Is it often a question of degree and extent? Yeah, it usually is - if you are quitting McDonald's to join Google, I think you should apologize for the inconvenience and then sleep soundly if you can't find a nicer way to handle the situation. Everything else is a matter of degree, and you should certainly be careful of minimizing the cost to someone else to rationalize doing what is easiest and most profitable for you.
– BrianH
May 2 '15 at 3:15
1
Basic principle: if you are asking whether something is unethical, that means you already know the answer but are hoping to find an excuse.
– keshlam
May 3 '15 at 18:34
1
1
If you're concerned about the ethics, tell them you're very interested but are want to hear the results of one more interview, and ask when they need you to commit by before they offer the job to the next candidate. That may let the situation resolve itself without having to decide between settling for the lesser job or breaking your word.
– keshlam
May 1 '15 at 17:38
If you're concerned about the ethics, tell them you're very interested but are want to hear the results of one more interview, and ask when they need you to commit by before they offer the job to the next candidate. That may let the situation resolve itself without having to decide between settling for the lesser job or breaking your word.
– keshlam
May 1 '15 at 17:38
1
1
@JoeStrazzere That's not an entirely appropriate analogy. We like to pretend that employers and employees are on equal footing and, as such, would be interchangeable. However, the consequences of an employee being unemployed and an employer having a vacant position are quite different.
– user34716
May 1 '15 at 22:50
@JoeStrazzere That's not an entirely appropriate analogy. We like to pretend that employers and employees are on equal footing and, as such, would be interchangeable. However, the consequences of an employee being unemployed and an employer having a vacant position are quite different.
– user34716
May 1 '15 at 22:50
1
1
If you make someone else's life harder to make your own life easier, ethics exist to tell us "you shouldn't do that". Is it tantamount to burglary or worse? No, certainly not. Is it often a question of degree and extent? Yeah, it usually is - if you are quitting McDonald's to join Google, I think you should apologize for the inconvenience and then sleep soundly if you can't find a nicer way to handle the situation. Everything else is a matter of degree, and you should certainly be careful of minimizing the cost to someone else to rationalize doing what is easiest and most profitable for you.
– BrianH
May 2 '15 at 3:15
If you make someone else's life harder to make your own life easier, ethics exist to tell us "you shouldn't do that". Is it tantamount to burglary or worse? No, certainly not. Is it often a question of degree and extent? Yeah, it usually is - if you are quitting McDonald's to join Google, I think you should apologize for the inconvenience and then sleep soundly if you can't find a nicer way to handle the situation. Everything else is a matter of degree, and you should certainly be careful of minimizing the cost to someone else to rationalize doing what is easiest and most profitable for you.
– BrianH
May 2 '15 at 3:15
1
1
Basic principle: if you are asking whether something is unethical, that means you already know the answer but are hoping to find an excuse.
– keshlam
May 3 '15 at 18:34
Basic principle: if you are asking whether something is unethical, that means you already know the answer but are hoping to find an excuse.
– keshlam
May 3 '15 at 18:34
suggest improvements |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
Unless the company has changed the offer, or there is a crisis in your life it is unethical to accept a job, then renege. I've know a few people that did this, and while they are all gainfully employed, I would not hire them.
You will be surprised by how small the world of jobs is in a city. Don't burn a bridge this way unless you have a REALLY good reason to.
I believe a much better course of action is to write to the first company explaining the situation, and seeing how flexible they are when you accept. Also inform the second company of your offer and they may be willing to speed the process up a bit.
answered May 1 '15 at 20:23
sevensevens
6,20321531
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
11
down vote
Personally, no, I wouldn't consider it ethical.
As someone who has been doing some hiring recently, theres a lot that goes on once a candidate accepts your offer - you start telling the second and third choices that they had failed to achieve an offer, and you start killing off adverts etc. So if you later turn around and say "actually, no, id much rather take my other offer" and we have already let other candidates down, that puts the company in a difficult position.
Its much more ethical to simply say "thank you, but I am waiting to see what the outcome of another interview is before I can accept or decline your offer". Dependent on how long the company may have to wait for an answer, they will probably be perfectly fine keeping the other candidates alive until they have your final decision.
Remember, the company probably has another choice, much as you do - you wouldn't find it ethical if the company offered the job to multiple candidates and after they have all accepted only then make an actual choice.
answered May 1 '15 at 18:22
Moo
5,91041723
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
1
down vote
What you are suggesting is accepting the offer on the contingency that you do not get this other offer, but telling the company that you accept it without reservations. In plain speak, that means you're lying. So, no, not ethical.
This differs significantly from the other question in that you are going into the situation hoping to leave within a week or so. If things pan out the way you hope, you might get paid for a week of onboarding and knowledge transfer, and then leave, with little to no benefit to the company.
If you wish to be ethical, tell them that you accept their offer contingent upon not receiving this other offer.
You can do this in a diplomatic manner, tell them you want to wait and evaluate the other offer.
This risks their withdrawing their offer, and you almost certainly won't get paid by them in the meantime, but on the upside they may increase their offer.
answered May 2 '15 at 18:44
jmoreno
7,9271840
suggest improvements |Â
StackExchange.ready(function ()
$("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function ()
var showEditor = function()
$("#show-editor-button").hide();
$("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
;
var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
if(useFancy == 'True')
var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');
$(this).loadPopup(
url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
loaded: function(popup)
var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');
pTitle.text(popupTitle);
pBody.html(popupBody);
pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
)
else
var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true)
showEditor();
);
);
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
Unless the company has changed the offer, or there is a crisis in your life it is unethical to accept a job, then renege. I've know a few people that did this, and while they are all gainfully employed, I would not hire them.
You will be surprised by how small the world of jobs is in a city. Don't burn a bridge this way unless you have a REALLY good reason to.
I believe a much better course of action is to write to the first company explaining the situation, and seeing how flexible they are when you accept. Also inform the second company of your offer and they may be willing to speed the process up a bit.
answered May 1 '15 at 20:23
sevensevens
6,20321531
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
Unless the company has changed the offer, or there is a crisis in your life it is unethical to accept a job, then renege. I've know a few people that did this, and while they are all gainfully employed, I would not hire them.
You will be surprised by how small the world of jobs is in a city. Don't burn a bridge this way unless you have a REALLY good reason to.
I believe a much better course of action is to write to the first company explaining the situation, and seeing how flexible they are when you accept. Also inform the second company of your offer and they may be willing to speed the process up a bit.
answered May 1 '15 at 20:23
sevensevens
6,20321531
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
Unless the company has changed the offer, or there is a crisis in your life it is unethical to accept a job, then renege. I've know a few people that did this, and while they are all gainfully employed, I would not hire them.
You will be surprised by how small the world of jobs is in a city. Don't burn a bridge this way unless you have a REALLY good reason to.
I believe a much better course of action is to write to the first company explaining the situation, and seeing how flexible they are when you accept. Also inform the second company of your offer and they may be willing to speed the process up a bit.
answered May 1 '15 at 20:23
sevensevens
6,20321531
Unless the company has changed the offer, or there is a crisis in your life it is unethical to accept a job, then renege. I've know a few people that did this, and while they are all gainfully employed, I would not hire them.
You will be surprised by how small the world of jobs is in a city. Don't burn a bridge this way unless you have a REALLY good reason to.
I believe a much better course of action is to write to the first company explaining the situation, and seeing how flexible they are when you accept. Also inform the second company of your offer and they may be willing to speed the process up a bit.
answered May 1 '15 at 20:23
sevensevens
6,20321531
answered May 1 '15 at 20:23
sevensevens
6,20321531
answered May 1 '15 at 20:23
sevensevens
6,20321531
answered May 1 '15 at 20:23
sevensevens
6,20321531
6,20321531
suggest improvements |Â
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
11
down vote
Personally, no, I wouldn't consider it ethical.
As someone who has been doing some hiring recently, theres a lot that goes on once a candidate accepts your offer - you start telling the second and third choices that they had failed to achieve an offer, and you start killing off adverts etc. So if you later turn around and say "actually, no, id much rather take my other offer" and we have already let other candidates down, that puts the company in a difficult position.
Its much more ethical to simply say "thank you, but I am waiting to see what the outcome of another interview is before I can accept or decline your offer". Dependent on how long the company may have to wait for an answer, they will probably be perfectly fine keeping the other candidates alive until they have your final decision.
Remember, the company probably has another choice, much as you do - you wouldn't find it ethical if the company offered the job to multiple candidates and after they have all accepted only then make an actual choice.
answered May 1 '15 at 18:22
Moo
5,91041723
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
11
down vote
Personally, no, I wouldn't consider it ethical.
As someone who has been doing some hiring recently, theres a lot that goes on once a candidate accepts your offer - you start telling the second and third choices that they had failed to achieve an offer, and you start killing off adverts etc. So if you later turn around and say "actually, no, id much rather take my other offer" and we have already let other candidates down, that puts the company in a difficult position.
Its much more ethical to simply say "thank you, but I am waiting to see what the outcome of another interview is before I can accept or decline your offer". Dependent on how long the company may have to wait for an answer, they will probably be perfectly fine keeping the other candidates alive until they have your final decision.
Remember, the company probably has another choice, much as you do - you wouldn't find it ethical if the company offered the job to multiple candidates and after they have all accepted only then make an actual choice.
answered May 1 '15 at 18:22
Moo
5,91041723
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
11
down vote
up vote
11
down vote
Personally, no, I wouldn't consider it ethical.
As someone who has been doing some hiring recently, theres a lot that goes on once a candidate accepts your offer - you start telling the second and third choices that they had failed to achieve an offer, and you start killing off adverts etc. So if you later turn around and say "actually, no, id much rather take my other offer" and we have already let other candidates down, that puts the company in a difficult position.
Its much more ethical to simply say "thank you, but I am waiting to see what the outcome of another interview is before I can accept or decline your offer". Dependent on how long the company may have to wait for an answer, they will probably be perfectly fine keeping the other candidates alive until they have your final decision.
Remember, the company probably has another choice, much as you do - you wouldn't find it ethical if the company offered the job to multiple candidates and after they have all accepted only then make an actual choice.
answered May 1 '15 at 18:22
Moo
5,91041723
Personally, no, I wouldn't consider it ethical.
As someone who has been doing some hiring recently, theres a lot that goes on once a candidate accepts your offer - you start telling the second and third choices that they had failed to achieve an offer, and you start killing off adverts etc. So if you later turn around and say "actually, no, id much rather take my other offer" and we have already let other candidates down, that puts the company in a difficult position.
Its much more ethical to simply say "thank you, but I am waiting to see what the outcome of another interview is before I can accept or decline your offer". Dependent on how long the company may have to wait for an answer, they will probably be perfectly fine keeping the other candidates alive until they have your final decision.
Remember, the company probably has another choice, much as you do - you wouldn't find it ethical if the company offered the job to multiple candidates and after they have all accepted only then make an actual choice.
answered May 1 '15 at 18:22
Moo
5,91041723
answered May 1 '15 at 18:22
Moo
5,91041723
answered May 1 '15 at 18:22
Moo
5,91041723
answered May 1 '15 at 18:22
Moo
5,91041723
5,91041723
suggest improvements |Â
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
1
down vote
What you are suggesting is accepting the offer on the contingency that you do not get this other offer, but telling the company that you accept it without reservations. In plain speak, that means you're lying. So, no, not ethical.
This differs significantly from the other question in that you are going into the situation hoping to leave within a week or so. If things pan out the way you hope, you might get paid for a week of onboarding and knowledge transfer, and then leave, with little to no benefit to the company.
If you wish to be ethical, tell them that you accept their offer contingent upon not receiving this other offer.
You can do this in a diplomatic manner, tell them you want to wait and evaluate the other offer.
This risks their withdrawing their offer, and you almost certainly won't get paid by them in the meantime, but on the upside they may increase their offer.
answered May 2 '15 at 18:44
jmoreno
7,9271840
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
1
down vote
What you are suggesting is accepting the offer on the contingency that you do not get this other offer, but telling the company that you accept it without reservations. In plain speak, that means you're lying. So, no, not ethical.
This differs significantly from the other question in that you are going into the situation hoping to leave within a week or so. If things pan out the way you hope, you might get paid for a week of onboarding and knowledge transfer, and then leave, with little to no benefit to the company.
If you wish to be ethical, tell them that you accept their offer contingent upon not receiving this other offer.
You can do this in a diplomatic manner, tell them you want to wait and evaluate the other offer.
This risks their withdrawing their offer, and you almost certainly won't get paid by them in the meantime, but on the upside they may increase their offer.
answered May 2 '15 at 18:44
jmoreno
7,9271840
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
What you are suggesting is accepting the offer on the contingency that you do not get this other offer, but telling the company that you accept it without reservations. In plain speak, that means you're lying. So, no, not ethical.
This differs significantly from the other question in that you are going into the situation hoping to leave within a week or so. If things pan out the way you hope, you might get paid for a week of onboarding and knowledge transfer, and then leave, with little to no benefit to the company.
If you wish to be ethical, tell them that you accept their offer contingent upon not receiving this other offer.
You can do this in a diplomatic manner, tell them you want to wait and evaluate the other offer.
This risks their withdrawing their offer, and you almost certainly won't get paid by them in the meantime, but on the upside they may increase their offer.
answered May 2 '15 at 18:44
jmoreno
7,9271840
What you are suggesting is accepting the offer on the contingency that you do not get this other offer, but telling the company that you accept it without reservations. In plain speak, that means you're lying. So, no, not ethical.
This differs significantly from the other question in that you are going into the situation hoping to leave within a week or so. If things pan out the way you hope, you might get paid for a week of onboarding and knowledge transfer, and then leave, with little to no benefit to the company.
If you wish to be ethical, tell them that you accept their offer contingent upon not receiving this other offer.
You can do this in a diplomatic manner, tell them you want to wait and evaluate the other offer.
This risks their withdrawing their offer, and you almost certainly won't get paid by them in the meantime, but on the upside they may increase their offer.
answered May 2 '15 at 18:44
jmoreno
7,9271840
answered May 2 '15 at 18:44
jmoreno
7,9271840
answered May 2 '15 at 18:44
jmoreno
7,9271840
answered May 2 '15 at 18:44
jmoreno
7,9271840
7,9271840
suggest improvements |Â
suggest improvements |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45056%2fethical-to-accept-job-offer-i-may-not-start%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
If you're concerned about the ethics, tell them you're very interested but are want to hear the results of one more interview, and ask when they need you to commit by before they offer the job to the next candidate. That may let the situation resolve itself without having to decide between settling for the lesser job or breaking your word.
– keshlam
May 1 '15 at 17:38
1
@JoeStrazzere That's not an entirely appropriate analogy. We like to pretend that employers and employees are on equal footing and, as such, would be interchangeable. However, the consequences of an employee being unemployed and an employer having a vacant position are quite different.
– user34716
May 1 '15 at 22:50
1
If you make someone else's life harder to make your own life easier, ethics exist to tell us "you shouldn't do that". Is it tantamount to burglary or worse? No, certainly not. Is it often a question of degree and extent? Yeah, it usually is - if you are quitting McDonald's to join Google, I think you should apologize for the inconvenience and then sleep soundly if you can't find a nicer way to handle the situation. Everything else is a matter of degree, and you should certainly be careful of minimizing the cost to someone else to rationalize doing what is easiest and most profitable for you.
– BrianH
May 2 '15 at 3:15
1
Basic principle: if you are asking whether something is unethical, that means you already know the answer but are hoping to find an excuse.
– keshlam
May 3 '15 at 18:34