Best way to address an executive who interrupts a conversation with a colleague

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
4
down vote

favorite












The situation was as follows: I was at a company event carrying a casual conversation with a colleague when I was interrupted mid-conversation by an executive. To my recollection, the executive was conferring with another executive and was curious about my professional history.



Ethically, what is the best way to continue? Would I apologize to my colleague and address the executive's question, continue with my current statement to my colleague and answer the executive's question after winding up our train-of-thought, or something completely different?







share|improve this question
















  • 7




    The simple way to know what the right thing to do in this situation is to give precedence to the person more likely to ensure you are employed tomorrow.
    – NotMe
    Apr 20 '15 at 23:20










  • +1 There used to be an Etiquette proposal on Area51, and what a beautiful addition to it would this have been.
    – rath
    Apr 21 '15 at 2:37
















up vote
4
down vote

favorite












The situation was as follows: I was at a company event carrying a casual conversation with a colleague when I was interrupted mid-conversation by an executive. To my recollection, the executive was conferring with another executive and was curious about my professional history.



Ethically, what is the best way to continue? Would I apologize to my colleague and address the executive's question, continue with my current statement to my colleague and answer the executive's question after winding up our train-of-thought, or something completely different?







share|improve this question
















  • 7




    The simple way to know what the right thing to do in this situation is to give precedence to the person more likely to ensure you are employed tomorrow.
    – NotMe
    Apr 20 '15 at 23:20










  • +1 There used to be an Etiquette proposal on Area51, and what a beautiful addition to it would this have been.
    – rath
    Apr 21 '15 at 2:37












up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











The situation was as follows: I was at a company event carrying a casual conversation with a colleague when I was interrupted mid-conversation by an executive. To my recollection, the executive was conferring with another executive and was curious about my professional history.



Ethically, what is the best way to continue? Would I apologize to my colleague and address the executive's question, continue with my current statement to my colleague and answer the executive's question after winding up our train-of-thought, or something completely different?







share|improve this question












The situation was as follows: I was at a company event carrying a casual conversation with a colleague when I was interrupted mid-conversation by an executive. To my recollection, the executive was conferring with another executive and was curious about my professional history.



Ethically, what is the best way to continue? Would I apologize to my colleague and address the executive's question, continue with my current statement to my colleague and answer the executive's question after winding up our train-of-thought, or something completely different?









share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Apr 20 '15 at 18:51









Raccoon

233




233







  • 7




    The simple way to know what the right thing to do in this situation is to give precedence to the person more likely to ensure you are employed tomorrow.
    – NotMe
    Apr 20 '15 at 23:20










  • +1 There used to be an Etiquette proposal on Area51, and what a beautiful addition to it would this have been.
    – rath
    Apr 21 '15 at 2:37












  • 7




    The simple way to know what the right thing to do in this situation is to give precedence to the person more likely to ensure you are employed tomorrow.
    – NotMe
    Apr 20 '15 at 23:20










  • +1 There used to be an Etiquette proposal on Area51, and what a beautiful addition to it would this have been.
    – rath
    Apr 21 '15 at 2:37







7




7




The simple way to know what the right thing to do in this situation is to give precedence to the person more likely to ensure you are employed tomorrow.
– NotMe
Apr 20 '15 at 23:20




The simple way to know what the right thing to do in this situation is to give precedence to the person more likely to ensure you are employed tomorrow.
– NotMe
Apr 20 '15 at 23:20












+1 There used to be an Etiquette proposal on Area51, and what a beautiful addition to it would this have been.
– rath
Apr 21 '15 at 2:37




+1 There used to be an Etiquette proposal on Area51, and what a beautiful addition to it would this have been.
– rath
Apr 21 '15 at 2:37










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
14
down vote



accepted










This is an instance where your colleague will understand - work takes precedence. The executive could have maybe been more polite by standing there waiting for you to bring him into the conversation, but I wouldn't be upset about it.



How you respond will depend on how long you think the answer will take. If it's a quick question, I would just answer it, make sure he doesn't have anything else, then go back to talking to the colleague. If it's clear that this question is really going to be an extended conversation, I would probably turn to my colleague and say something like, "I'll find you and we can finish this story later." Then I would turn to the exec and begin to answer the actual question.






share|improve this answer




















    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "423"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44429%2fbest-way-to-address-an-executive-who-interrupts-a-conversation-with-a-colleague%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    14
    down vote



    accepted










    This is an instance where your colleague will understand - work takes precedence. The executive could have maybe been more polite by standing there waiting for you to bring him into the conversation, but I wouldn't be upset about it.



    How you respond will depend on how long you think the answer will take. If it's a quick question, I would just answer it, make sure he doesn't have anything else, then go back to talking to the colleague. If it's clear that this question is really going to be an extended conversation, I would probably turn to my colleague and say something like, "I'll find you and we can finish this story later." Then I would turn to the exec and begin to answer the actual question.






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      14
      down vote



      accepted










      This is an instance where your colleague will understand - work takes precedence. The executive could have maybe been more polite by standing there waiting for you to bring him into the conversation, but I wouldn't be upset about it.



      How you respond will depend on how long you think the answer will take. If it's a quick question, I would just answer it, make sure he doesn't have anything else, then go back to talking to the colleague. If it's clear that this question is really going to be an extended conversation, I would probably turn to my colleague and say something like, "I'll find you and we can finish this story later." Then I would turn to the exec and begin to answer the actual question.






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        14
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        14
        down vote



        accepted






        This is an instance where your colleague will understand - work takes precedence. The executive could have maybe been more polite by standing there waiting for you to bring him into the conversation, but I wouldn't be upset about it.



        How you respond will depend on how long you think the answer will take. If it's a quick question, I would just answer it, make sure he doesn't have anything else, then go back to talking to the colleague. If it's clear that this question is really going to be an extended conversation, I would probably turn to my colleague and say something like, "I'll find you and we can finish this story later." Then I would turn to the exec and begin to answer the actual question.






        share|improve this answer












        This is an instance where your colleague will understand - work takes precedence. The executive could have maybe been more polite by standing there waiting for you to bring him into the conversation, but I wouldn't be upset about it.



        How you respond will depend on how long you think the answer will take. If it's a quick question, I would just answer it, make sure he doesn't have anything else, then go back to talking to the colleague. If it's clear that this question is really going to be an extended conversation, I would probably turn to my colleague and say something like, "I'll find you and we can finish this story later." Then I would turn to the exec and begin to answer the actual question.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 20 '15 at 19:08









        David K

        20.8k1075110




        20.8k1075110






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44429%2fbest-way-to-address-an-executive-who-interrupts-a-conversation-with-a-colleague%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

            Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

            Confectionery